Screening Environmental Pseudomonads for Characteristics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Screening Environmental Pseudomonads for Characteristics Suitable for a Bio-engineered Oil Remediation Agent By Mohammed Ibrahim Umar B Eng., MSc A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in the School of Science, Engineering and Technology, Abertay University Dundee, United Kingdom April, 2016 DEDICATION This dissertation work is dedicated to my loving and caring children for given me joy when am bored writing and resuscitating me back on track; Ummu-salma (Mami), Umar-Farouk (Amir), Halimatu-sadiya, Abubakar-sadiq (Bappa/Sarki), Sumayya, Ibrahim (Mallam), Fatimatu-zahra’u, and Muhammad Page ii AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I, Ibrahim Umar Mohammed hereby wilfully declare that the following thesis is based on the results of research wholly conducted by myself, and that it is of my own composition. This thesis has not, in whole or in part, been previously presented for a higher degree or qualification. All works used in the course of this work are evidently referenced as appropriate. …………………………….... Date: 27-04-2016 School of Science, Engineering & Technology (SET), Abertay University Dundee DD1 1HG, United Kingdom Page iii CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that Ibrahim Umar Mohammed, a PhD candidate has undertaken all the work described herein and is based on the original work done at the Abertay University, Dundee in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Bioremediation. This has not previously formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, assistanceship, fellowship or any similar title and represents an independent work on the part of the candidate. Signature of the Principal Supervisor…………………………….... Dr. Andrew Spiers, School of Science, Engineering & Technology (SET), Abertay University Dundee DD1 1HG, United Kingdom Page iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to thank my PhD supervisors, Dr Andrew Spiers and Dr Yusuf Deeni, for supporting me during these past four years. Andrew has refined my research capabilities through patience, understanding through his immense knowledge. His guidance helped me in all the time of research and writing of this thesis. I hope that I could be as active, enthusiastic and robust as Andrew and to someday be able to use my wealth of knowledge and experience to sway an audience as well as he can. Good supervisor who always encouraged and expected the research group working in the laboratory to think more independently about their experiments and results. Yusuf has been supportive and has given me constructive advice and insightful discussions in all the stages of this work. My appreciation goes to members of the SIMBIOS group, and the entire PhD students of School of Science, Engineering and Technology, who were not part of the group but helped me in one way or the other. I would like to thank my family and parents, dad-late Alh Muhammadu Umaru, mum-Hajiya Salamatu and Hajiya Jummai Umaru for giving birth to me in the first place and supporting me spiritually throughout my life. My brothers and sisters Engr. Muhammad Kabir Umar, Maryam Mamman and Habibu Umar and others too many to mention here for the role you all played. I am indebted to Dr Labaran Lawal & family for their kindness, care and supportive role throughout my stay in Dundee. Page v Thanks also go out to Dr. Simona M. Hapca who provided me with statistical analysis and advice at times of critical need. My friends and colleagues at home, Dr Idris M. Jega, Engr Sirajo Muhammad, Abu Sabo (Small Z) Mu’azu Guraguri, Abdulwahab Garba, Aminu Ja’afar, Engr Ayuba Ndahi, Jamil Hayatu, Hassan Salisu Ahmed, Dr Martin O. Eduvie and others too many to list here but you know who you are, for providing support and friendship that I needed. Bilal Tijjani Kumalia, Sen. Muhammad Ali Ndume for the crucial role you played. Last but not the least; I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Zuzana Spiers for water sample collection and for making my stay in Dundee a memorable one on so many occasions. In conclusion, I recognize that this research would not have been possible without the full sponsorship from The Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), Nigeria and therefore, my unreserved gratitude and sincere appreciation goes to my beloved country Nigeria. LONG LIVE PTDF AND LONG LIVE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA. Page vi AUD - PERMISSION TO COPY In submitting this thesis to the Abertay Unversity, Dundee, I understand that I am giving the permission for the research to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subjected to any copy right vested in the work not being affected thereby. Ibrahim Umar Mohammed (Author) (signed) Date: 27- 04 - 2016 Page vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS A – Absorbance AD – Anderson-darling statistics AD* – Adjustted Anderson-darling statistics A–L – Air-liquid interface ANOVA – Analysis of variance Ai – Aqueous index Ei – Emulsion index EPS – Extracellular polymeric substances HCA – Hierarchical cluster analysis IDI – Individual distribution identification LSTRA – Low surface tenstion reducing activity OD – Optical density Oi – Oil index P – Predicted value r – Correlation coefficient SE– Standard error SUDS – Sustainable urban drainage systems TK-HSD – Tukey Kramer Honest Significant Difference ULO – Used lubricating oil γMin – Minimum surface tension Page viii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION..................................................................................................................ii AUTHOR’S DECLARATION...………………………………………………………………iii CERTIFICATION............…………………………………………………………………......iv ACKOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………………..v-vi UAD – PERMISSION TO COPY…………………………………………………...............vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS....…………………………………...viii TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………..ix-xv LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………..........xvi-xvii LIST OF TABLES...……………………………………………………………………xviii-xix ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………xx CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………1 1.1 An introduction to this thesis……………………………………………………………...1 1.2 The origins of environmental pollution…………………………………………………..3 1.3 Bioremediation of hydrocarbon of hydrocarbon contaminated soils and other environments……………………………………………………………………………………4 1.4 The Involvement of bacteria in bioremediation ………………………………………...9 1.4.1 A brief introduction to bacteria for non-microbiologist……………………………...9 1.4.2 Bacterial biofilms……………………………………………………………………...11 1.4.3 The Pseudomonads………………………………………………………………….13 1.5 Bacterial surfactants……………………………………………………………………..16 1.5.1 A brief introduction to surfactants and biosurfactants for the non-chemist…….16 1.5.2 Types of biosurfactants produced by microorganisms and their uses ………...18 Page ix 1.5.3 Prediction of minimum surface tension achieved by bacteria ………………….22 1.5.4 Biosurfactant-oil behaviour…………………………………………………………23 1.6 Aims of this thesis………………………………………………………………………...25 1.6.1 Study rationale………………………………………………………………………..25 1.6.2 Research objectives for this work…………………………………………………..26 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS……………………………………………...29 2.1 General Microbiology…………………………………………………………………….29 2.1.1 Media and culturing conditions…………………………………………................29 2.1.2 Growth and other measurements by spectrophotometry………………………..30 2.1.3 Bacterial strains used in this work………………………………………………….31 2.2 Sample collection…………………………………………………………………………31 2.2.1 Wastewater…………………………………………………………………………...31 2.2.2 Soil…………………………………………………………………………………….32 2.3 Isolation of pseudomonads……………………………………………………………...32 2.4 Phenotypic characterisation……………………………………………………………..33 2.4.1 Acid production in the presence of maltose……………………………………….33 2.4.2 Catalyse test………………………………………………………………………….34 2.4.3 Drop collapse assay………………………………………………………...............34 2.4.4 Gelatinase activity…………………………………………………………..............34 2.4.5 Kanamycin resistance……………………………………………………………….35 2.4.6 KB culture acidity…………………………………………………………………….35 2.4.7 Lipase activity…………………………………………………………….................35 2.4.8 Mercury resistance…………………………………………………………………..36 Page x 2.4.9 Oxidase test…………………………………………………………………………..36 2.4.10 Protease secretion………………………………………………………………….36 2.4.11 Sodium chloride tolerance………………………………………………..............37 2.4.12 Swarming motility…………………………………………………………………..37 2.4.13 Sugar utilisation…………………………………………………………………….37 2.4.14 Swimming motility…………………………………………………………………..38 2.4.15 Tetracycline resistance…………………………………………………………….38 2.4.16 Twitching motility……………………………………………………………………38 2.5 Biofilm formation………………………………………………………………………….39 2.5.1 Qualitative assessment of biofilm-formation in static microcosms….................39 2.5.2 Quantitative assessment of biofilm-formation in static microcosms…...............39 2.5.3 Glass bead column biofilms………………………………………………………...40 2.6 Measurement and prediction of liquid surface tension……………………………….40 2.6.1 Measurement of liquid surface tension…………………………………………….40 2.6.2 Prediction of the minimum surface tension (Min)………………………...............41 2.7 Cellulose expression……………………………………………………………………..41 2.8 Microbial attachment to hydrocarbons (MATHS assay)……………………. ……….42 2.9 Emulsion assay…………………………………………………………………………...42 2.10 Oil-displacement assay………………………………………………………………...42 2.11 Bacterial foaming assay………………………………………………………………..43 2.12 Statistics………………………………………………………………………………….43 CHAPTER 3 ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF PSEUDOMONAS SPP. BACTERIA…………………………………………………………………………………….45