DOCSLIB.ORG

Monsanto Survey of Glyphosate and Ampa in Groundwaters and Surface Waters in Europe Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MONSANTO SURVEY OF GLYPHOSATE AND AMPA IN GROUNDWATERS AND SURFACE WATERS IN EUROPE FINAL REPORT WRc Ref: UC8073.02 NOVEMBER 2009 SURVEY OF GLYPHOSATE AND AMPA IN GROUNDWATERS AND SURFACE WATERS IN EUROPE Report No.: UC8073.02 Date: November 2009 Authors: Helene Horth and Karen Blackmore Contract Manager: Karen Blackmore Contract No.: 15276-0 RESTRICTION: This report has the following limited distribution: External: 3 copies Internal: 3 copies Any enquiries relating to this report should be referred to the authors at the following address: WRc Swindon, Frankland Road, Blagrove, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN5 8YF. Telephone: + 44 (0) 1793 865000 Fax: + 44 (0) 1793 865001 Website: www.wrcplc.co.uk The contents of this document are subject to copyright and all rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. This document has been produced by WRc plc. CONTENTS SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Acknowledgements 7 2. AUSTRIA 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Surface Water 8 2.3 Groundwater 9 2.4 Summary 10 3. BELGIUM 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 Surface Water 11 3.3 Groundwater 15 3.4 Summary 18 4. BULGARIA 19 4.1 Summary 19 5. CYPRUS 20 5.1 Summary 20 6. CZECH REPUBLIC 21 6.1 Summary 21 7. DENMARK 22 7.1 Introduction 22 7.2 Surface Water 22 7.3 Groundwater 22 7.4 Summary 26 8. ESTONIA 27 8.1 Summary 27 9. FINLAND 28 9.1 Introduction 28 9.2 Surface Water 28 9.3 Groundwater 29 9.4 Summary 30 10. FRANCE 31 10.1 Introduction 31 10.2 Surface Water 31 10.3 Groundwater 34 10.4 Summary 36 11. GERMANY 37 11.1 Introduction 37 11.2 Surface Water 37 11.3 Groundwater 47 11.4 Summary 49 12. GREECE 50 12.1 Summary 50 13. HUNGARY 51 13.1 Summary 51 14. IRELAND 52 14.1 Introduction 52 14.2 Surface Water 52 14.3 Groundwater 54 14.4 Summary 54 15. ITALY 55 15.1 Introduction 55 15.2 Surface Water 55 15.3 Groundwater 56 15.4 Summary 56 16. LATVIA 57 16.1 Introduction 57 16.2 Surface Water 57 16.3 Groundwater 57 16.4 Summary 57 17. LITHUANIA 58 17.1 Summary 58 18. LUXEMBOURG 59 18.1 Summary 59 19. MALTA 60 19.1 Introduction 60 19.2 Groundwater 60 19.3 Summary 60 20. NORWAY 61 20.1 Introduction 61 20.2 Surface Water 61 20.3 Groundwater 63 20.4 Summary 64 21. POLAND 65 21.1 Summary 65 22. PORTUGAL 66 22.1 Summary 66 23. ROMANIA 67 23.1 Summary 67 24. SLOVAK REPUBLIC 68 24.1 Introduction 68 24.2 Surface Water 68 24.3 Groundwater 69 24.4 Summary 69 25. SLOVENIA 70 25.1 Summary 70 26. SPAIN 71 26.1 Introduction 71 26.2 Surface Water 71 26.3 Groundwater 72 26.4 Summary 72 27. SWEDEN 73 27.1 Introduction 73 27.2 Surface Water 73 27.3 Groundwater 76 27.4 Summary 79 28. SWITZERLAND 80 28.1 Introduction 80 28.2 Surface water 80 28.3 Groundwater 81 28.4 Summary 83 29. THE NETHERLANDS 84 29.1 Introduction 84 29.2 Surface Water 84 29.3 Groundwater 91 29.4 Summary 92 30. UNITED KINGDOM 94 30.1 Introduction 94 30.2 Surface Water 94 30.3 Groundwater 96 30.4 Summary 98 31. CONCLUSION 99 REFERENCES 101 APPENDICES APPENDIX A PROFESSIONALS / ORGANISATIONS CONTACTED 111 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of glyphosate and AMPA data in surface water in Europe 3 Table 2 Summary of glyphosate and AMPA data in surface water in Europe 4 Table 2.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater in Austria, 2004 (source: UBA, 2006) 10 Table 3.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface waters in Flanders, 2000-2006 (source: MIRA, 2007) 11 Table 3.2 Glyphosate results for Escaut RBD, 2001-2006 (source: Denis Godeaux, Direction Eaux de Surface, Wallonie) 13 Table 3.3 Glyphosate results for the Meuse RBD, 2001-2006 (source: Denis Godeaux, Direction Eaux de Surface, Wallonie) 14 Table 3.4 Glyphosate results for the Rhine (Moselle) RBD, 2003-2004 (source: Denis Godeaux, Direction Eaux de Surface, Wallonie) 15 Table 3.5 Percentage detection of AMPA and glyphosate at groundwater monitoring sites in Flanders, spring 2006 (source: MIRA, 2007 and details from www.milieurapport.be) 16 Table 7.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in the main groundwater surveys in Denmark, 1993 – 20071) (source: GEUS, 2009) 24 Table 7.2 Glyphosate and AMPA in the main groundwater surveys in Denmark, 1993 – 2002 (source: GEUS, 2003) 24 Table 7.3 Glyphosate and AMPA in agricultural watersheds (shallow groundwater) and ‘other observation boreholes’ (mainly small private water supplies) in Denmark, 1993 – 2002, and 1993 – 2007 (source: GEUS, 2003 and 2009) 25 Table 9.1 Surface water monitoring in two rivers in Finland, 2007 to 2009 (source: Mira Grönroos, Finnish Environment Institute SKYE, personal communication, 2009) 29 Table 9.2 Groundwater monitoring in Finland, 2002 to 2008 (source: Tapini Säynätkari, Finnish Environment Institute SKYE, personal communication, 2009) 30 Table 10.1 Glyphosate in French surface waters, 1997 – 2006 (source: extracted from the Ifen database, provided via Monsanto, Annick Geeraerts, personal communication, 2009) 32 Table 10.2 AMPA in French surface waters, 1998 – 2006 (source: extracted from the Ifen database, provided via Monsanto, Annick Geeraerts, personal communication, 2009) 32 Table 10.3 Glyphosate and AMPA detections in the Ile de France region in 2005-06 and 2006-07 (source: DIREN, 2006; DIREN, 2008) 33 Table 10.4 Glyphosate in French groundwater, 1999 – 2006 (source: extracted from the Ifen database, provided via Monsanto, Annick Geeraerts, personal communication, 2009) 35 Table 10.5 AMPA in French groundwater, 1999 – 2006 (source: extracted from the Ifen database, provided via Monsanto, Annick Geeraerts, personal communication, 2009) 35 Table 11.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface water in the State of Baden Württemberg, 2006 - 2008 (source: Claudia Früh, LUBW, personal communication, 2009) 38 Table 11.2 Glyphosate and AMPA in the river Main, State of Hessen, 2007-2008 (source: Dr. Peter Seel, Hessisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie, Wiesbaden, personal communication, 2009) 39 Table 11.3 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface waters in Nordrhein-Westfalen, 2006-2008 (Source: NRW FlussWinIMS database, 2009, http://www.elwasims.nrw.de/ims/FlussWinIMS/start.htm) 40 Table 11.4 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface waters in the State of Rheinland- Pfalz, 2004-2007 (source: LUWG, 2009) 41 Table 11.5 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface water in Sachsen-Anhalt, 01.01.2009-04.09.2009 (source: Beate Zedler, LAWA - Representative, Ministry of Environment, Hessen, personal communication, 2009) 44 Table 11.6 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface waters in Thüringen, 1997-2008 (source: data provided by Beate Zedler, LAWA - Representative, Ministry of Environment, Hessen, personal communication, 2009) 45 Table 11.7 Glyphosate and AMPA at water intakes on the Rhine, 1999-2004 (in g l-1) (source: Brauch et al., 2002 and 2003; ARW 2004) 46 Table 11.8 Glyphosate and AMPA on the river Rhine, monthly analyses in 2004 (in g l-1) (source: ARW, 2004) 47 Table 11.9 Glyphosate and AMPA in raw water intakes at Styrom-Ost and Hengsen waterworks (river Ruhr) in 2005 (source: Schlett et al., 2005) 47 Table 11.10 Glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater in Germany, 1996-2008 (source: Dr Wolter, UBA, personal communication, 2009) 48 Table 14.1 Glyphosate monitoring in surface waters in Ireland, 2007 to 2009 (source: provided to Monsanto by Dr.Ciaran O'Donnell, personal communication, 2009) 52 Table 14.2 Glyphosate results from the SE River Basin District, Ireland, 2005 - 2006 (source: TNO, 2007 and TNO, 2008) 53 Table 15.1 Results of glyphosate monitoring in surface waters of the Lombardy Region of Italy, 2005-2007 (source: data provided to Monsanto by Giuseppina Veraldi, Arpa Lombardia) 55 Table 15.2 Results of glyphosate groundwater monitoring in the Lombardy Region of Italy, 2005-2007 (source: provided to Monsanto by Giuseppina Veraldi, Arpa Lombardia) 56 Table 20.1 Glyphosate application in agricultural areas and glyphosate and AMPA detected in streams and rivers in Norway, 1997-2006 (source: Ludvigsen and Lode, 2008) 62 Table 20.2 Glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater in agricultural areas in Norway (source: Ludvigsen and Lode, 2008) 63 Table 24.1 Glyphosate in surface waters in Slovak Republic 2006 – 2008 (source: Lea Mrafkova, Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, personal communication, 2009) 68 Table 26.1 Glyphosate data from two river basin districts in Spain with water quality issues (Javier Cachón de Mesa, Head of Environmental Information, Ministry of Environment, personal communication, 2009) 71 Table 27.1 Glyphosate in Swedish surface water, 2000 - 2008 (source: SLU Pesticides Database, 2008, http://pesticid.slu.se) 74 Table 27.2 AMPA in Swedish surface water, 2000 - 2008 (source: SLU Pesticides Database, 2008, http://pesticid.slu.se) 75 Table 27.3 Glyphosate in Swedish groundwater, 2000 - 2008 (source: SLU Pesticides Database, 2008, http://pesticid.slu.se) 77 Table 27.4 Glyphosate detection in groundwater in Regions M, C, O and S, 2000 – 2008 * (source: SLU Pesticides Database, 2008, http://pesticid.slu.se) 78 Table 27.5 AMPA in Swedish groundwater, 2000 - 2008 (source: SLU Pesticides Database, 2008, http://pesticid.slu.se) 79 Table 28.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface water in Switzerland (source: Hanke et al., 2008) 81 Table 28.2 Glyphosate and AMPA in groundwater in Switzerland (BAFU, 2009) 82 Table 29.1 Glyphosate and AMPA in surface water in the Netherlands in 2006 (source: Pesticides Atlas, 2008, last updated 13 Dec.
Recommended publications
  • Castles Along the Rhine & Moselle, 5 Days

    Castles Along the Rhine & Moselle, 5 Days

    CASTLES ALONG THE RHINE & MOSELLE Private Escorted Tour April 1 - October 20, 2021 - Departure any day 5 days / 4 nights: 1 night in Frankfurt, Liebenstein Castle, Ehrenburg Castle, Trier, Heidelberg Accommodation Meals Tours Transportation Transfer Not included 4* hotels in each city Breakfast daily in Tours throughout as Car or minival during entire tour. Arrival and City taxes in hotels each city. per itinerary. departure transfers to be paid on site English speaking guide during Admissions to entire tour. castles included Wine tasting Rates 2021 US$ per Person Day by Day Itinerary Day 1: The tour begins in Frankfurt and follows the Rhine to Rudesheim. Enjoy a sightseeing Hotel Class & Dates Twin Single tour of Rudesheim’s old historic center. Next we embark on a cruise and sail along the Rhine River, the Lorelei Valley. Disembark at Kamp-Bornhofen and ascend to Liebenstein 4* Hotel Castle, which towers high above the village and offers a beautiful view of the Rhine. April 1 - October 20 $3,569 $3,924 Accommodation in this 13th century castle. The rooms have been beautifully restored in medieval style. *Based on minimum 2 people traveling Day 2: After breakfast, travel to the ancient Roman city of Koblenz, one of the oldest cities in together. Germany. Then continue to the “Deutsches Eck” or German Corner, where the Moselle meets the Rhine. Cross the river in a panoramic cable car for a spectacular view. Visit the Liebenstein ← Frankfurt Ehrenbreitstein Fort, the second largest fort in Europe. Then continue along the Moselle ← river and the Ehrbachtal Valley. Ascend to Ehrenburg Castle for the Night.
  • EMS INFORMATION BULLETIN Nr 144

    EMS INFORMATION BULLETIN Nr 144

    16/07/2021 EMSR517 – Flood in Western Germany EMSR518 – Flood in Belgium EMSR519 – Flood in Switzerland EMSR520 – Flood in The Netherlands EMS INFORMATION BULLETIN Nr 144 THE COPERNICUS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICE The Copernicus Emergency Management Service forecasts, notifies, and monitors devastating floods in Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland CEMS flood forecasting and notifying in Germany On 9 and 10 July, flood forecasts by the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS) of the Copernicus Emergency Management Service indicated a high probability of flooding for the Rhine River basin, affecting Switzerland and Germany. Subsequent forecasts also indicated a high risk of flooding for the Meuse River basin, affecting Belgium. The magnitude of the floods forecasted for the Rhine River basin increased significantly in this period. The first EFAS notifications were sent to the relevant national authorities starting on 10 July and, with the continuously updated forecasts, more than 25 notifications were sent for specific regions of the Rhine and Meuse River basins in the following days until 14 July. Figure: EFAS flood forecast from 12.07.2021 00:00 UTC Providing early and current maps of flooded areas On 13 July, the CEMS Rapid Mapping component was activated to map the ongoing floods in parts of Western Germany (EMSR517 Mapping Website , EMSR517 Activation Viewer). As a flood peak was foreseen on 16 July for segments of other rivers, CEMS preemptively acquired satellite images of the vulnerable area through Pre-Tasking on 14 July. These early images informed ensuing activations by the CEMS Rapid Mapping component based on the EFAS forecasts for areas in Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and France.
  • Supplement of a High-Resolution Dataset of Water Fluxes and States for Germany Accounting for Parametric Uncertainty

    Supplement of a High-Resolution Dataset of Water Fluxes and States for Germany Accounting for Parametric Uncertainty

    Supplement of Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1769–1790, 2017 http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/1769/2017/ doi:10.5194/hess-21-1769-2017-supplement © Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of A high-resolution dataset of water fluxes and states for Germany accounting for parametric uncertainty Matthias Zink et al. Correspondence to: Luis Samaniego ([email protected]) and Matthias Zink ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence. Table S1. Time and location invariant global parameters of mHM v4.3 which are purpose to an automated calibration. Category Number Paraeter Name Unit Minimum Maximum Interception 1 canopyInterceptionFactor [1] 0.1 0.3 2 snowTreshholdTemperature [◦C] -2 2 3 degreeDayFactor_forest [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 0.0001 4 4 degreeDayFactor_impervious [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 0.5 4 5 degreeDayFactor_pervious [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 0.5 6 Snow 6 increaseDegreeDayFactorByPrecip [d−1 mm−1] 0.1 7 7 maxDegreeDayFactor_forest [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 3 8 8 maxDegreeDayFactor_impervious [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 3 8 9 maxDegreeDayFactor_pervious [mm d−1 ◦C−1] 3 8 10 orgMatterContent_forest [%] 4 7 11 orgMatterContent_impervious [%] 0 0.1 12 orgMatterContent_pervious [%] 1.5 3 13 PTF_lower66_5_constant [-] 0.7 0.8 Soil moisture - 14 PTF_lower66_5_clay [-] 0.0005 0.0015 storage 15 PTF_lower66_5_Db [-] -0.27 -0.25 16 PTF_higher66_5_constant [-] 0.8 0.9 17 PTF_higher66_5_clay [-] -0.0015 -0.0005 18 PTF_higher66_5_Db [-] -0.35 -0.3 19 infiltrationShapeFactor [-] 0.5 4 20 Permanent Wilting Point [-]
  • Gemeinde Und Verbandsgemeinde Arbeiten Zukunftsweisend „Örtliches Hochwasser- Und Starkregenvorsorgekonzept Der VG Göllheim“ Wurde Erstellt

    Gemeinde Und Verbandsgemeinde Arbeiten Zukunftsweisend „Örtliches Hochwasser- Und Starkregenvorsorgekonzept Der VG Göllheim“ Wurde Erstellt

    Nr. 1/2020 Seite 1 im Februar 2021 Gemeinde und Verbandsgemeinde arbeiten zukunftsweisend „Örtliches Hochwasser- und Starkregenvorsorgekonzept der VG Göllheim“ wurde erstellt Die ältesten bekannten Fotos von Überschwemmun- Der Hammerhof von der Kleinmühle aus gesehen im gen stammen wahrscheinlich aus dem Jahr 1940. Jahr 1962. Hier die ehemalige Schafsbrücke. Albisheim ist sowohl von Überflu- Die Gemeinde Albisheim ist auf tungen aus der Pfrimm und vom Leisels- Grund ihrer Lage im Tal an zwei Bach- bach, als auch zunehmend von Sturzflu- läufen schon immer von Hochwasserer- ten aus Starkregen betroffen. Ziel des ört- eignissen betroffen. lichen Hochwasser- und Starkregenvor- Das älteste bekannte Hochwasser, von sorgekonzeptes ist die Erarbeitung von dem berichtet wurde, war am 27. Novem- Maßnahmen aus verschiedenen Hand- ber 1882. Es war besonders verheerend, lungsbereichen der Hochwasservorsorge, da alle Mühlen entlang der Pfrimm aus- die geeignet sind, Schäden zu reduzie- fielen, weil sie im Wasser standen, und ren und neue nicht entstehen zu lassen. sich die Felder auf weiter Strecke in eine Das Konzept soll für die Ortsgemeinde, Seenlandschaft verwandelten. Auch 1892 die Verbandsgemeinde, die Verbandsge- lung der Gewässer im Zuge der Gewäs- und 1902 wurden weitere Überschwem- meindewerke, die Feuerwehr und jeden serunterhaltung. mungen registriert. Auf einem Foto der Einzelnen Handlungsoptionen aufzeigen, Zu den Daueraufgaben der Gewässe- Schafsbrücke vom Hochwasser 1940 ist um sich besser auf solche Ereignisse vor- runterhaltspflichtigen gehören regelmä- an Markierungen zu sehen, dass 1920 und bereiten zu können. ßige Kontrollen der Pfrimm sowie Lei- 1930 das Wasser an der Brücke höher ge- Besonderer Schwerpunkt hat dabei selsbach und Fixierung oder Entnahme standen war. Vor dem Hochwasser 1962, auch die Hochwasservorsorge in der von gefährlichem Totholz im Zuge der von dem viele Fotos existieren, wurde Bauleitplanung.
  • Results of Recent Terrace Research in the Middle Rhine Valley

    Results of Recent Terrace Research in the Middle Rhine Valley

    Results of Recent Terrace Research in the Middle Rhine Valley A lot of questions concerning the sequence of terraces in the Middle Rhine Valley as well as their genetic dependence on geological, geomorphological and climatic processes remain insufficiently answered. So far, three issues in particular have required further examination: -The phenomenon of the horizontal consistency ("Horizontalkonstanz") of the main terraces cannot be explained coherently. -Studies from adjoining valleys of the Nahe and Lahn rivers, have identified larger numbers of terraces within the upper terrace group (ANDRES & SEWERING 1983; GÖRG 1984; SEWERING 1993). -Unsolved problems concerning the positions and ages of the older (äHT) and younger (jHT) main terraces. Given these problems, we started re-mapping the terraces of the Upper Middle Rhine Valley by conducting numerous borehole drillings. Our results, which we combined with the findings presented in previous studies, demonstrate the existence of a total of 28 alluvial sediment bodies in the valleys of the rivers Nahe and Rhine between Bad Kreuznach, Bingen and Boppard (GÖRG 1984; PREUSS 1983; ANDRES & PREUSS 1983; PREUSS, BURGER & SIEGLER 2015). For the Lower Middle Rhine Valley we mainly used the publications of BIBUS (1980), HOSELMANN (1994) AND BOENIGK & HOSELMANN (2003). For the Moselle and Lahn CORDIER et al. (2006, 2014) and SEWERING (1993) provided helpful insights. Further information was obtained from FUCHS et al. (1983), BIBUS & SEMMEL (1977)AND SEMMEL (2009). .The Downstream Correlation Diagram (DCD) of river terraces in the Lower Nahe and Upper Middle Rhine Valley (see Fig. 1) contains 28 alluvial sediment bodies. They were identified at key locations with more than 720 borehole drillings, many of them in clusters, which in most cases reached the rockbed of the river terraces.
  • No Frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine River Basin

    No Frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine River Basin

    IKSR CIPR No frontiers for the Rhine ICBR Inventory 2004 in the Rhine river basin Co-ordinating Committee RHINE INVENTORY ALONG THE RHINE CHANCES OFFERED BY AN EU DIRECTIVE the European Union aim at water Reduce pollution protection at a high level, no matter, whether groundwater, The status of waters may not dete- rivers, lakes or coastal waters are riorate under any circumstances. concerned. The EU Member States must take appropriate measures to improve waters which are expected to The target probably not meet the environ- is the good status mental objectives by 2015. All uses must be taken into account By 2015, rivers, lakes, coastal which directly or indirectly affect waters and groundwater are to the state of waters, no matter Photo: Stanko Petek, www.luftbild.com The Falls of the Rhine at Schaffhausen have reached a good status. The whether industry, navigation, the reference is the natural state of use of hydroelectric power or water bodies with their variety of agriculture is concerned. A central In 2004, a large scale inventory of plants and animals, an unaltered task in the Rhine river basin will be form and water regime and the to reduce polluting agents and to the Rhine and the waters in its natural quality of surface waters keep dangerous substances away catchment was concluded. Nine and groundwater. Distinctions are from waters. Apart from that the states were involved in this work made between: to which the European Water - the good ecological and chemical status for surface Framework Directive had given waters (rivers, lakes, transitional rise. This directive modernises and and coastal waters).
  • Annales Scientifiques Wissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 2011

    Annales Scientifiques Wissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 2011

    2011 2012 SOMMAIRE TOME / BAND 16 – 2011-2012 • Première observation en France de l’Ecrevisse calicot, Orconnectes immunis (Hagen, 1870) - COLLAS M.,BEINSTEINER D., FRITSCH S., MORELLE S. & L’HOSPITALIER M. ............................................................ 18-36 • Die Forsthäuser in und um Speyerbrunn Baukulturelles Erbe und Symbol für die Kulturlandschaft Pfälzerwald - FINKBEINER J. .................. 38-73 • Flusskrebse im Einzugsgebiet von Saarbach und Eppenbrunner Bach - Er- fassung und grenzüberschreitender Schutz autochthoner Flusskrebsarten im Biosphärenreservat „Pfälzerwald – Vosges du Nord“ - IDELBERGER S., SCHLEICH S., OTT J. & WAGNER M. ....................................... 74-98 • Wooge auf die Agenda des Biosphärenreservats ? Bedeutung, Bewertung und zukünftige Bewirtschaftung der prägenden Gewässer im Pfälzerwald - KOEHLER G., FREY W., HAUPTLORENZ H. & SCHINDLER H. ..... 100-117 • Der Biosphärenturm - ein innovatives Alleinstellungsmerkmal zur Baum- kronenforschung - LAKATOS M., WIRTH R., SPITZLEY P., LEDERER F. & BÜDEL B. ............................................................................... 118-129 • Suivi de la mortalité routière de la faune le long de la route départementale reliant Bitche à Sarreguemines - MORELLE S. & GENOT J.-C. ....... 130-143 Annales • La conservation des arbres d’intérêt biologique dans le Parc naturel régional des Vosges du Nord. Un premier bilan - PASCAL B. .................... 144-153 scientifiques • La réactualisation des ZNIEFF dans le Parc naturel régional des Vosges
  • Zur Schiffbarkeit Der Oberen Donau in Römischer Zeit

    Zur Schiffbarkeit Der Oberen Donau in Römischer Zeit

    www.ssoar.info Zur Schiffbarkeit der oberen Donau in römischer Zeit Höckmann, Olaf Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Höckmann, O. (2003). Zur Schiffbarkeit der oberen Donau in römischer Zeit. Deutsches Schiffahrtsarchiv, 26, 23-40. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-52550-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an. BINNENSCHIFFAHRT ̈ OLAF HÖCKMANN Zur Schiffbarkeit der oberen Donau in römischer Zeit Prof.
  • Verbandsordnung Gewässerzweckverband Isenach

    Verbandsordnung Gewässerzweckverband Isenach

    Verbandsordnung Gewässerzweckverband Verbandsordnung des Gewässerzweckverbandes Isenach-Eckbach K.d.ö.R. Die Verbandsversammlung beschließt am 19.03.2013 die 2. Änderung der Verbandord- nung vom 27.04.2008 (Neufassung) zuletzt geändert durch die 1. Änderung vom 21.01.2010. I. Teil Mitglieder, Name, Sitz, Verbandsgebiet, Aufgaben und Unternehmen § 1 Mitglieder Nachstehende Städte, Verbandsgemeinden, Gemeinden und Landkreise bilden einen Gewässerunterhaltungsverband nach §§ 2 - 11 des Zweckverbandsgesetzes: A) Städte und Gemeinden 1. Bad Dürkheim 2. Bobenheim-Roxheim 3. Böhl-Iggelheim 4. Frankenthal/Pfalz 5. Grünstadt 6. Lambsheim 7. Ludwigshafen a. Rh. 8. Mutterstadt 9. Worms B) Verbandsgemeinden 1. Dannstadt-Schauernheim (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet) 2. Deidesheim (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet) 3. Freinsheim (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet) 4. Grünstadt-Land (für die Gebiete der Ortsgemeinden Bissersheim, Dirmstein, Gerolsheim, Großkarlbach, Kirchheim a.d.Wstr., Kleinkarlbach, Laumersheim, Neuleiningen und Obersülzen 5. Heßheim (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet) 6. Maxdorf (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet) 7. Wachenheim a.d.Wstr. (für das gesamte Verbandsgemeindegebiet ) C) Landkreise Rhein-Pfalz-Kreis Stand: 01.07.2013 Verbandsordnung Gewässerzweckverband § 2 Name, Sitz und Verbandsgebiet (1) Der Verband führt den Namen "Gewässerzweckverband Isenach-Eckbach". Er hat seinen Sitz in Lambsheim. (2) Der Gewässerbestand (Verbandsgebiet) ergibt sich aus der Gewässerbestandsliste des Kostenverteilers.
  • The German Rivers Rhine, Moselle, Neckar and Main and Their Castles

    The German Rivers Rhine, Moselle, Neckar and Main and Their Castles

    River Castles Tour The German Rivers Rhine, Moselle, Neckar and Main and their Castles For hundreds of years the Rhine has ranked as one of the most popular travel destinations in Europe. This region, truly one of the most beautiful in Germany, was recognized as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 2002. Spend plenty of time discovering the river, its castles and ruins, tales and legends and also those of its tributaries Moselle, Neckar and Main. The days are planned to offer you many highlights but they are leisurely paced with time for you to explore on your own. Enjoy, relax and let us take care of the details for you. Map Itinerary Day 1 - DEPARTURE Board your flight from your home destination to Frankfurt, Germany. This itinerary assumes this to be an overnight flight. Air fare independently arranged. River Castles - The German Rivers Rhine, Moselle, Neckar and Main and their Castles 2 Day 2 - WELCOME TO THE RHINE Arrival in Frankfurt, Germany. Your flight should arrive at the Frankfurt Airport by 11:15 a.m. at the latest for the complimentary transfer at noon. When the group is complete we drive directly to the RHINE for lunch in one of the charming villages on the River. Transfer to the four-star Bellevue Rheinhotel in Boppard, one of the best hotels in the Rhine area. This Art Nouveau style hotel is situated directly on the river, with a dock at its front door, and has welcomed guests since 1877. We will spend the next five nights here. You can spend some relaxing moments at the on-site swimming pool and sauna.
  • Themenliste GN Isenach-Eckbach

    Themenliste GN Isenach-Eckbach

    Themenliste GN Isenach-Eckbach GN Jahr Ort Schwerpunktthema Referat 1 Referat 2 Referat 3 Referat 4 Referat 5 Exkursion 2019 Das neue Naturnahe Bäche in Ortslagen sowie Die Renaturierung des Der neue Landesnaturschutzgesetz Neurungen zum Ökologische Mindestanforderungen Besichtigung der GN Rehbach/Speyerbach, GN Neustadt an der Speyerbachs im „Grünzug Böbig“ Gewässerentwicklungsplan für Rheinland-Pfalz (LNatSchG) – 2018 Landesnaturschutzgesetz an die Gewässerentwicklung und Speyerbachrenaturierung in Stadtgebiet Isenach/Eckbach Weinstraße in Neustadt/W. – Planung und den Rehbach in der Germarkung Auswirkungen auf die (LNatSchG RLP) und Auswirkungen –unterhaltung in Ortslagen von Neustadt/Weinstraße Umsetzung Neustadt und Haßloch Wasserwirtschaft und erste auf die Wasserwirtschaft Erfahrungen Vorstellung des "alla hopp"- Gewässerentwicklung in der Verwendung von Besichtigung der Alla hopp Anlage am Gewässerentwicklung am rojektes am Triefenbach in Gebeitsfremde Pflanzen GN Rehbach/Speyerbach, GN Verbandsgemeinde Edenkoben – gebietseigenem Wildsaatgut – Triefenbach und andere Maßnahmen im 2017 Edenkoben Triefenbach, Edenkoben - Planungsprämissen (Neophyten) an Fliegwässern – Isenach/Eckbach Erfahrungen, Planungen und Chancen für den Gebiet der Verbandsgemeinde Wildsaatgut und Neophyten und Erfahrungen bei der Planung Wie gehen wir damit um? Perspektiven Grünlandartenschutz Edenkoben und Umsetzung Vorstellung des NABU- Projektes: Wiederbelebung Die lineare Durchgängigkeit des Herstellung der linearen Herstellung der Durchgängigkeit ehemaliger
  • A Comparison of Urban River Restoration Practices in France and Germany

    A Comparison of Urban River Restoration Practices in France and Germany

    Article Societal Drivers of European Water Governance: A Comparison of Urban River Restoration Practices in France and Germany Aude Zingraff-Hamed 1,2,3,*, Sabine Greulich 2, Karl Matthias Wantzen 2,3 and Stephan Pauleit 1,* 1 Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Center of Life and Food Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 6, 85354 Freising, Germany 2 Interdisciplinary Research Center for Cities, Territories, Environment and Society (UMR CNRS 7324 CITERES), Université François Rabelais, 33 allée Ferdinand de Lesseps, 37000 Tours, France; [email protected] (S.G.); [email protected] (K.M.W.) 3 Applied Aquatic Ecology and UNESCO “River Culture-Fleuves et Patrimoine”, Université François Rabelais, 33 allée Ferdinand de Lesseps, 37000 Tours, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.Z.-H.); [email protected] (S.P.); Tel.: +49-152-2873-1583 (A.Z.-H.); 49-816-171-4781 (S.P.) Academic Editor: Y. Jun Xu Received: 28 November 2016; Accepted: 14 February 2017; Published: 10 March 2017 Abstract: The European water governance took a decisive turn with the formulation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD), which demands the restoration of all water bodies that did not achieve sufficient ecological status. Urban rivers are particularly impaired by human activities and their restorations are motivated by multiple ecological and societal drivers, such as requirements of laws and legislation, and citizen needs for a better quality of life. In this study we investigated the relative influence of socio-political and socio-cultural drivers on urban river restorations by comparing projects of different policy contexts and cultural norms to cross-fertilize knowledge.