DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX 6B Figures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX 6B Figures ROVER PIPELINE PROJECT Resource Report 6 – Geological Resources APPENDIX 6B Figures February 2015 Lawrence Stark Butler Columbiana Armstrong Beaver Carroll Pna Hancock Indiana Jefferson Qal 50 Allegheny ! Pnc OH 0 Tuscarawas ! Westmoreland 0 ! ! 0 PA Pnm Washington Pnc Pd Qal Ohio Guernsey Belmont ! Fayette Noble Pnm Dch, Chemung Group, siltstone Greene Somerset 0 Marshall ! Dhs, Hampshire Formation, shale Pd 0 50 ! ! Mg, Greenbrier Group, limestone Mg Qal Pd Monroe Pnm Mmc, Mauch ChunkPna Group, shalePnc Mmc Qal Mp MonongaliaMp, Pocono Group, sandstone Wetzel Pnpv Mmc PAa, Allegheny Formation, sandstone Marion Pnc Preston Dch Qal Pd WV PAc, ConemaughPna Group, shale Mp Tyler Pnc Pnm Pnm Mg Harrison Pna PAm, Monongahela Group, sandstone Pleasants Qal Pnm Dhs Pnpv Mmc TaylorPApv, Pottsville Group, sandstone Pnc 0 ! Qal Pnc Garrett Pnm! 0 Pd NA Mp Pd Pd, Dunkard Group, sandstone Pnpv Doddridge Barbour Pnpv Grant Pnm Ritchie Pnc Pnc Pna Qal, QuaternaryDhs Alluvium,Tucker alluviumPna Pna Dch Pnm Mg Wirt Lewis water, water, water Mmc Gilmer Pnc Pd Pnm Pd Upshur Qal Pnpv Mp ! Mile Posts Mainline B Berne Lateral Majorsville Lateral Burgettstown Lateral Seneca Lateral Ü Rover Pipeline Project CGT Lateral Sherwood Lateral 010205 Figure 6B-1 Cadiz Lateral Supply Connector A Miles Geologic Materials in the Project Area Clarington Lateral Supply Connector B SOURCE: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/ Mainline A geology/state/state.php?state=WV Sheet 1 of 4 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\RR6_WV_6B-1.mxd Path: Document Pcc Pcg Pcc Pm Pcg Pcg Pm Pcc Pm Pcc Pcg PPw 0 ! Pm Pm PPw Pg PPw Pw Pw Pm Pm Pcc Pcc Pcc Pw PPw Pm Pw Pg PPw OH Pw PPw Pg Pg Pm Pw PA Pg Pm Pw PPw Pw PPw Pg Pg Pw WV Pw Pm Pw Pw 0 ! PPw Pg Pm Pg PAcc, Casselman Formation, shale Pg Pm PPw PAcg, Glenshaw Formation, shale PAm, Monongahela Group, limestone Pg PPAw, Waynesburg Formation, sandstone Pg Pg, Greene Formation, sandstone Pw Pw, Washington Formation, sandstone PPw Pm Pw Pw ! Mile Posts Burgettstown Lateral Ü Rover Pipeline Project 048 Majorsville Lateral Miles Figure 6B-1 http://mrdata.usgs.gov/ Geologic Materials in the Project Area geology/state/state.php? state=PA Sheet 2 of 4 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\RR6_PA_6B-1.mxd Path: Document Canada MI 50 ! Lake Erie Water Mc MDsd Stg Dts Ddr Mlc Da 0 Dd ! 200 Dbb ! Dpl Dbb Ddu Sl Dp IPap Do ! Do Ss Dol Ms 100 ! Stg Mlc ! 50 Dc Dbb IPap Ddc Ss ! Do 50 Dd OH IPm Sl Ss ! ! Da.Antrim Shale.shale Oc.Cincinnati Group as used by Wickstrom (1990).shale SccDbb.Berea Sandstone and Bedford Shale, Undivided.sandstone Odl.Drakes, Whitewater and Liberty Formations, Undivided.shale Ms Dc.Columbus Limestone.limestone Ogm.Grant Lake and Fairview Formations, Miamitown Shale, Undivided.limestone IPc Dd.Delaware Limestone.limestone Ok.Kope Formation.shale Smb Ddc.Detroit River Group and Columbus Limestone, Undivided.dolostone (dolomite) Owa.Waynesville and Arnheim Formations, Undivided.shale Ddr.Detroit River Group.dolostoneSce (dolomite) PAap.Allegheny and Pottsville Groups, Undivided.shale ! Mlc ! 0 Ddu.Dundee Limestone.limestone Stg PAc.Conemaugh Group.siltstone ! ! Oc PIPd Do.Ohio Shale.black shale Dc PAm.MonongahelaMcb Group.shale Dol.OlentangyOdl Shale.shale PPAd.Dunkard Group.mudstone Dp.Prout Limestone.limestone Scc.Clinton and Cataract Groups, Undivided.shale IPm Dpl.Plum Brook Shale.shale Scl Do Sce.Cedarville, Springfield, and Euphemia Dolomites, Undivided.dolostone (dolomite) Dts.Traverse Group.dolostone (dolomite) Scl.Cedarville, Springfield, Euphemia, and Laurel Dolomites; Massie Shale, Undivided.dolostone (dolomite) Sdb MDsb.Sunbury Shale, Berea Sandstone, and Bedford Shale,Ss Undivided.shale Sdb.Dayton and Brassfield Limestones.limestone IPc MDsd.Sunbury and Bedford Formations, Undivided.shale MDsbSe.Estill Shale.shale Spb 0 ! Ogm WV ! 0 MDu.Mississippian and Devonian Undifferentiated.sandstone Sl.Lockport Dolomite.dolostone (dolomite)IPc Owa Mlc Mc.Coldwater Shale.shale Smb.Massie and Osgood Shales; Dayton and Brassfield Limestones; Laurel Dolomite; Undivided .limestone Mcb.Black Hand Sandstone Member of Cuyahoga Formation.sandstone Ss.Salina Group.dolostone (dolomite) IPap Ok Sd Mlc.Maxville Limestone; Rushville, Logan, and CuyhogaMDu Formations, Undivided.shale Stg.Tymochtee and Greenfield Formations, Undivided.dolostone (dolomite) Ms.SunburyOgl Shale.black shaleOda Se water.water.water PIPd Op ! Mile Posts Mainline B Berne Lateral Majorsville Lateral Burgettstown Lateral Market Segment Ü Rover Pipeline Project CGT Lateral Seneca Lateral 0204010 Figure 6B-1 Cadiz Lateral Sherwood Lateral Miles Geologic Materials in the Project Area Clarington Lateral Supply Connector A SOURCE: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology Mainline A Supply Connector B /state/state.php?state=OH Sheet 3 of 4 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\RR6_OH_6B-1.mxd Path: Document Jr Ps Db Ps Jr Ps DMs Pg Ps Mc Mc Jr Pg Mmi DMs Db Pg Mm Db Jr Mmi Mm Pg DMs Pg Jr Pg Mmi Db Jr DMs Pg Jr DMs Pg Mb Jr Pg Pg DMs Db Dbd 100 ! Db water Mc Da Mmi Mc MI Da water Mc Da Mmi Mb DMs, black shale, Mm Dt Mb Da, black shale, limestone Ps Dt Ddr Ddr Db, sandstone, siltstone Dbd Dd Ddr Dbd, shale, sandstone Dd, limestone, dolostone (dolomite) Db Dd Mm Ddr Ddr Ddr, dolostone (dolomite), limestone Dg, dolostone (dolomite), limestone Mc DMs Ds, sandstone, dolostone (dolomite) 50 Dd ! Ds Dt, limestone, shale Dd Ds Dg Mc Jr, shale, Dd Mb, limestone, dolostone (dolomite) Mc, shale, limestone Sb Ds Mm, sandstone, siltstone Ddr Da Ss Mmi, shale, black shale Ds Ss Ss PAg, sandstone, shale PAs, sandstone, shale Sb, dolostone (dolomite), shale OH Ss, evaporite, shale water, water, ! Mile Posts Market Segment Ü Rover Pipeline Project 010205 Miles Figure 6B-1 Geologic Materials in the Project Area SOURCE: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geology/ state/state.php?state=MI Sheet 4 of 4 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\RR6_MI_6B-1.mxd Path: Document Lapeer Genesee Shiawassee St. Clair Canada 100 Oakland Macomb ! Livingston MICHIGAN Washtenaw ! 50 Lake Lenawee Erie Fulton ! Defiance 0 200 Wood ! Henry 150 ! Seneca Hancock 100 Crawford ! Ashland Wayne Stark Richland ! 50 Carroll Hancock 50 ! Jefferson 0 OHIO Tuscarawas ! Harrison 0 !! 0 Washington EXPLANATION Belmont Peak acceleration, expressed as ! a fraction of standard gravity (g) 0 0 ! 30-20 ! 50 Marshall Noble ! ! 0 0 Monroe 20-14 Wetzel 14-10 Tyler 10-6 6-4 0 WEST ! 0 4-2 VIRGINIA 1 in = 34 miles 2-0 0204010 Miles ! Mile Posts Mainline B Counties Majorsville Lateral Berne Lateral Market Segment Burgettstown Lateral Seneca Lateral Ü Rover Pipeline Project CGT Lateral Sherwood Lateral Seismic Hazard Map Cadiz Lateral Supply Connector A of the Project Area- SOURCE: http://earthquake.usgs.gov 2% Probability of Exceedance in 50 years Clarington Lateral Supply Connector B /hazards/products/conterminous Mainline A /2014/2014_pga2pct50yrs.pdf Figure 6B-2 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Seismic_6B-2.mxd R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Path: Document Lapeer Genesee Shiawassee St. Clair Canada 100 Oakland Macomb ! Livingston MICHIGAN Washtenaw ! 50 Lake Lenawee Erie Fulton ! Defiance 0 200 Wood ! Henry 150 ! Seneca Hancock 100 Crawford ! Ashland Wayne Stark Richland ! 50 Carroll Hancock 50 ! Jefferson 0 OHIO Tuscarawas ! Harrison 0 !! 0 Washington Belmont ! 0 0 ! ! 50 Marshall Noble ! ! 0 0 Monroe Wetzel EXPLANATION Tyler Peak acceleration, expressed as a fraction of standard gravity (g) 0 WEST ! 2-3 VIRGINIA 0 3-4 1 in = 34 miles 0204010 Miles ! Mile Posts Mainline B Counties Majorsville Lateral Berne Lateral Market Segment Burgettstown Lateral Seneca Lateral Ü Rover Pipeline Project CGT Lateral Sherwood Lateral Seismic Hazard Map of the Project Area Cadiz Lateral Supply Connector A SOURCE: http://earthquake.usgs.gov 10% Probability of Exceedance in 50 years Clarington Lateral Supply Connector B /hazards/products/conterminous/2008 Mainline A /2014/maps/ceus/pga.ceus.10pc50.gif Figure 6B-3 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Seismic_6B-3.mxd R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Path: Document Lapeer Genesee Shiawassee MICHIGAN St. 51 Clair Canada 100 Oakland Macomb ! Livingston Washtenaw 15 15 50 ! 15 Lake 15 Lenawee 15 Erie 15 1515 15 15 1515 1515 151515 15 15 15 1515 15 15 Fulton 15 15 15 1515 0 ! 200 Wood 15 Defiance ! Henry 15 15 150 Seneca ! Hancock 100 Crawford ! Ashland Wayne Stark 15 15 ! 50 Hancock 15 Richland Carroll 15 15 50 15 ! Jefferson 0 OHIO Tuscarawas ! 15 Harrison 0 15 !! 0 Washington Belmont ! 0 0 0 ! Marshall ! 50 Noble ! ! 0 Monroe 15 15 Wetzel Tyler 0 ! 0 15 WEST 1 inDoddridge = 35 miles 0204010 VIRGINIA Miles 15 Historic Earthquake < 2.5 Magnitude Mainline A ! Mile Posts Mainline B Counties Majorsville Lateral Berne Lateral Market Segment Ü Rover Pipeline Project Burgettstown Lateral Seneca Lateral Historical Earthquake Map Sherwood Lateral CGT Lateral SOURCE: In Project Area Cadiz Lateral Supply Connector A ANSS- http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ Clarington Lateral Supply Connector B earthquakes/search/ Figure 6B-4 February 2015 Document Path: R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Earthquake_6B-5.mxd R:\Projects\GIS_2014\219149_ETC_Rover\mxd\Figures\ETRover_RR6 Path: Document * * * * * * * * * * * * MP 175 * MP 174 MP 173 MP 172 MP 171 * MP 170 MP 169 Wood* MP 168 * * MP 167
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    Hydrogeologic Framework of Mississippian Rocks in the Central Lower Peninsula of Michigan By D.B. WESTJOHN and T.L. WEAVER U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4246 Lansing, Michigan 1996 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm name in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 Open-File Reports Section Lansing, Ml 48911 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................... 1 Geology .......................................................... 3 Coldwater Shale ................................................ 3 Marshall Sandstone .............................................. 6 Michigan Formation .............................................. 7 Hydrogeologic framework of Mississippian rocks ................................ 8 Relations of stratigraphic units to aquifer and confining units .................... 8 Delineation of aquifer- and confining-unit boundaries ......................... 9 Description of confining units and the Marshall aquifer ........................ 9 Michigan confining
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States
    BEST PRACTICES for: Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States First Edition Disclaimer This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed therein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. Cover Photos—Credits for images shown on the cover are noted with the corresponding figures within this document. Geologic Storage Formation Classification: Understanding Its Importance and Impacts on CCS Opportunities in the United States September 2010 National Energy Technology Laboratory www.netl.doe.gov DOE/NETL-2010/1420 Table of Contents Table of Contents 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary ____________________________________________________________________________ 10 1.0 Introduction and Background
    [Show full text]
  • PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS Cience for a Changing World AVAILABILITY of BOOKS and MAPS of the U.S
    PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1418 USGS cience for a changing world AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current- year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tions released prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may be no longer available. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices given below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey Earth of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single Science Information Centers (ESIC's), all of which are authorized copies of Preliminary Determination of Epicenters, and some mis­ agents of the Superintendent of Documents: cellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are ANCHORAGE, Alaska Rm. 101,4230 University Dr. obtainable by mail from LAKEWOOD, Colorado Federal Center, Bldg. 810 U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services MENLO PARK, California Bldg. 3, Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paleoecology and Biogeography of Ordovician Edrioasteroids
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2011 The Paleoecology and Biogeography of Ordovician Edrioasteroids Rene Anne Lewis University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Lewis, Rene Anne, "The Paleoecology and Biogeography of Ordovician Edrioasteroids. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1094 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Rene Anne Lewis entitled "The Paleoecology and Biogeography of Ordovician Edrioasteroids." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Geology. Michael L. McKinney, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Colin D. Sumrall, Linda C. Kah, Arthur C. Echternacht Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) THE PALEOECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY OF ORDOVICIAN EDRIOASTEROIDS A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville René Anne Lewis August 2011 Copyright © 2011 by René Anne Lewis All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the New Chairman
    Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter No. 21 April, 2005 MESSAGE FROM THE NEW CHAIRMAN Dear SDS Members: This new Newsletter gives me the pleasant opportunity to thank you for your confidence which should allow me to lead our Devonian Subcommission successfully through the next four years until the next International Geological Congress in Norway. Ahmed El Hassani, as Vice-Chairman, and John Marshall, as our new Secretary, will assist and help me. As it has been our habit in the past, our outgoing chairman, Pierre Bultynck, has continued his duties until the end of the calendar year, and in the name of all the Subcommission, I like to express our warmest thanks to him for all his efforts, his enthusi- asm for our tasks, his patience with the often too slow progress of research, and for the humorous, well organized and skil- ful handling of our affairs, including our annual meetings. At the same time I like to thank all our outgoing Titular Members for their partly long-time service and I express my hope that they will continue their SDS work with the same interest and energy as Corresponding Members. The new ICS rules require a rather constant change of voting members and the change from TM to CM status should not necessarily be taken as an excuse to adopt the lifestyle of a “Devonian pensioner”. I see no reason why constantly active SDS members shouldn´t become TM again, at a later stage. On the other side, the rather strong exchange of voting members should bring in some fresh ideas and some shift towards modern stratigraphical tech- niques.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B-13
    Attachment B-13 Hydrogeology for Underground Injection Control · n Michigan: Part 1 Department of Geology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Underground Injection Control Program 1981 Acknowledgements ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF DENNIS L. CURRAN LINDA J. MILLER DONALD N. LESKE Project Coordinator Cartographer Regional Coordinator PROJECT DIRECTORS RICHARD N. PASSERO W. Thomas Straw Lloyd J. Schmaltz Ph .D., Professor of Geology Ph.D., Professor of Geology Chatrman, Department of Geology Department of Geology, Western Michigan University RESEARCH STAFF CYNTHIA BATHRICK WILLIAM GIERKE CRYSTAL KEMTER JEFFREY PFOST PAUL CIARAMITARO PAUL GOODREAULT STEVEN KIMM NICK POGONCHEFF PATRICIA DALIAN DAVID HALL KEVIN KINCARE KIFF SAMUELSON DOUGLAS DANIELS EVELYN HALL MICHAEL KLEIN JEFFREY SPRUIT DARCEY DAVENPORT THOMAS HANNA BARBARA LEONARD GARY STEFANIAK JEFFREY DEYOUNG ROBERT HORNTVEDT THOMAS LUBY JOSEPH VANDERMEULEN GEORGE DUBA JON HERMANN HALLY MAHAN LISA VARGA SHARON EAST WILLIAM JOHNSTON JAMES McLAUGHLIN KATHERINE WILSON JAMES FARNSWORTH PHILLIP KEAVEY DEANNA PALLADINO MICHAEL WIREMAN LINDA FENNER DONALD PENNEMAN CARTOGRAPHIC STAFF LINDA J. MILLER Chief Cartographer SARAH CUNNINGHAM CAROL BUCHANAN ARLENE D. SHUB DAVID MOORE KENNETH BATTS CHRISTOPHER H. JANSEN NORMAN AMES ANDREW DAVIS ANN CASTEL PATRICK HUDSON MARK LUTZ JOAN HENDRICKSEN MAPPING CONSULTANT THOMAS W. HODLER Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Geography Department of Geography Western Michigan University CLERICAL PERSONNEL KARN KIK JANET NIEWOONDER
    [Show full text]
  • Terran Cornoration Environmental Services
    Page 11 Terran Cornoration Environmental Services Mr. James Yskamp, Esq. February 1, 2018 Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services 159 South Main Street, Suite 1030 Akron, Ohio 44308 RE: Technical Report Review: "Evaluation of Groundwater Impacts, Dewatering of Proposed Enon Quarry, Clark County, Ohio " Dear Mr. Y skamp, I, Brent E. Huntsman, CPG, President and Principal Hydrogeologist ofTerran Corporation (Terran) was retained by Fair Shake Environmental Legal Services to review and comment upon the hydrogeologic characterization and predicted dewatering effects to the water resources of Mad River Township, Clark County, OH as described in a groundwater model report prepared for a mining permit modification. This report review was to include an evaluation of the aquifer response and hydraulic performance predicted by the model simulations of the groundwater system; the magnitude and extent of a cone of depression resulting from dewatering various limestone quarry pits. The purpose of my review is to provide a letter report summarizing my expert opinions regarding the adequacy of the groundwater model to appropriately simulate dewatering effects upon the local groundwater regime. All opinions in this report are based upon my review of existing information (developed through the litigation process in this case or in the public record) together with my 43-years of experience in applied hydrogeology, specifically aquifer characterization and water resources development. My current curriculum vita is included with this letter report as Attachment 2. These opinions are expressed to a reasonable degree of scientific and professional certainty. I reserve the right to supplement this report and opinions as additional material becomes available through the litigation process or continued review of public literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Information Maxville Lime.Stone
    .·-~ . f GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF OHIO WILBER STOUT, State Geologist Fourth Series Information Circular No. 3 RECENT INFORMATION ON THE MAXVILLE LIME.STONE by RAYMONDE. LAMBORN COLUMBUS 1945 Reprinted 1961 HOOK I\(..• OHIO GEOL. SURVEY. LAKE ERIE SECTION LIBRARY CARD NO. ·7 STATE CF OHIO Michael V. DiSalle Governor DEPARTMENT CF NATURAL RESOURCES Herbert B. Eagon Director NATURAL RESOURCES CCMMISSION C. D. Blubaugh Joseph E. Hunt Herbert B. Eagon Roy M. Kottman Byron Frederick DemClB L. Sean Forrest G. Hl1ll Myron T. Sturgeon Willian• Hoyne DIVISION OF GEQ.OGICAL SURVEY Ralph j. Bernhagen Chief COLUMBUS 1945 Reprinted 1961 Heer ptg. Co., Cols., O. INTRODUCTION The Maxville has been an important source of limestone for more than 100 years in southern and east central Ohio where it was first utilized for mortar and for furnace flux. Probably for this rea~on outcrops of a limestone later shown to be Maxville in age were described by Briggs in 1838 who noted occurrences near Maxville, Perry County; on Three Mile Run near Logan in Hocking County; near Reeds Mills near Wellston, Jackson County; and at the Canter Quarry in Hamilton Township, Jack- son County.1 Further obser.vations of this limestone were made by E. B. Andrews of the Second Geological Survey of Ohio and his report was published in the Report of Progress in 1869. Andrews named the lime- stone the Maxville for its occurrence near Maxville, Hocking County, noted its patchy distribution on the outcrop, described its stratigraphic position as immediately overlying the Logan sandstones ana shales, and declared the limestone to be of sub-Carboniferous (Mississippian) age.
    [Show full text]
  • Kope Formation Disturbed
    Types and Examples of Slides Glossary – Clay-rich deposits prone to failure, – Fine-grained laminated deposits of Landslides and board Backwater deposits Lake bed clays they are best developed south of the Ohio River. They occur clay and silt laid down in lakes dammed by ice during fences tilted, monuments tilted pulled apart in terraces at the mouths of tributaries to a larger stream the Pleistocene Epoch (Ice Age). They are exceptionally Your Property colluvium - soil where glacial outwash caused a temporary lake to form. unstable, even on gentle slopes. OH tension Bedrock – Term used by engineers and geologists when Lamination – A texture in soil or rock that is made up of Study curved tree Area trunks cracks, tilted referring to the Ordovician limestones and shales that very thin (a few millimeters to a centimeter) parallel layers IN pavement underlie soil everywhere in the area. The bedrock itself (see fig. 21). The layers may reflect an annual pattern of seldom fails, and so determining the depth to bedrock is a sedimentation. KY Kope Formation tilted guard key part of any site investigation. rails and Ordovician System – The set of rock formations that utility poles Bridging – Large rock fragments that interfere with proper make up the local bedrock. It consists of limestone and trace of compaction of finer fill material. shale that was deposited in an ancient ocean between 444 scarp and 488 million years ago. Colluvium – A clay-rich deposit derived from weathering of bedrock that has moved downslope by gravity from its – Sand and gravel deposits left from the flowing CREEP Outwash place of origin.
    [Show full text]