SACO Participants' Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SACO Participants' Manual SACO Participants' Manual Adam L. Schiff University of Washington Libraries for the Program for Cooperative Cataloging Library of Congress, Cataloging Distribution Service Washington, D.C. 2001 Table of Contents Acknowledgments iv Introduction 1 Why Participate in SACO? 3 SACO Documentation 5 Practicalities 6 Subject Headings 9 When to Make a SACO Proposal 10 Authority Research for Subjects 12 Subject Authority Proposal Form 14 Guidelines for Formulating LC Subject Heading Proposals 16 Examples of Decisions Involved in Making New Subject Proposals 19 Example A: Log-periodic antennas 19 Example B: Systems librarians 20 Example C: Cataloging of cartographic materials 21 Example D: Chinese mitten crab 23 Example E: Kane, Alex (Fictitious character) 25 Example F: Historical fiction, Chilean 26 Example G: Madhupur Jungle (Bangladesh) 27 Example H: Heading with non-free-floating subdivision Wetlands -- Interpretive programs 29 Example I: Establishing a free-floating subdivision under a pattern heading Fishes -- Predators of 30 Summary of LC Subject Heading Editorial Process 32 Sample Pages from Tentative Weekly List 34 Sample Pages from Approved Weekly List 37 MARC Authority Format for Subjects 40 Fixed Fields 41 008/06: Direct or Indirect Geographic Subdivision 41 008/09: Kind of Record 42 008/11: Subject Heading System/Thesaurus 44 008/29: Reference Evaluation 45 008/33: Level of Establishment 46 008/39: Cataloging Source 47 Variable Fields 48 010: Library of Congress Control Number 48 040: Cataloging Source 49 053: LC Classification Number 50 1XX: Headings 51 100: Personal Name 52 110: Corporate Name 53 111: Meeting Name 54 130: Uniform Title 55 150: Topical Term 56 151: Geographic Name 63 i 260: General See Reference 66 360: General See Also Reference 67 4XX: See From Tracings (Used For Cross-References) 68 5XX: See Also From Tracings (See Also Cross-References) 70 667: Nonpublic General Note 72 670: Source Data Found 73 675: Source Data Not Found 81 680: General Public Notes (Scope Notes) 82 681: Subject Example Tracing Note 84 682: Deleted Heading Note 86 781: Subdivision Heading Linking Entry--Geographic Subdivision 87 952: Local Notes 88 953: Cataloger Code 90 Subject Heading Change Proposals 91 When to Make a Change Proposal 92 LC Subject Heading Change Proposal Form 94 LC Subject Heading Change Guidelines 96 Examples of Subject Heading Change Proposals 98 Examples A-C: Adding cross-references (used for references) 98 Example D: Adding a see also reference 102 Example E: Adding a broader term reference 103 Examples F-G: Changing the authorized form of heading 105 Examples H-I: Revising an 053 Field 108 Example J: Revision of references 111 Classification 113 Why Submit Classification Proposals? 114 LC Classification Proposal Form 115 Classification Proposals 116 Examples of Classification Proposals 119 Example A: New Cutter number; new classification schedule style 119 Example B: New Cutter number; old classification schedule style 122 Example C: New Cutter number plus see reference from one entry to another 124 Example D: New Cutter number in a table; pattern cited 126 Example E: New Cutter number; hierarchical Cutters 129 Example F: New whole number; anchor point above 131 Example G: New whole number; anchor point below 133 Example H: New decimal number; anchor point above 136 Example I: New decimal number; pattern cited 138 Example J: New decimal number; anchor point below 141 Example K: New decimal number; caption including explanatory note 143 Example L: Whole and decimal numbers; pattern cited 146 Example M: Multiple decimal numbers; pattern cited 149 Example N: Changing a caption 152 Example O: Changing (adding to) a caption and adding a see reference 154 Example P: Changing (adding to) a caption and adding a see reference across a range of numbers 156 ii Example Q: Creating a new number and changing the indention of a range of numbers beneath it 158 Example R: Splitting one number into multiple numbers 160 Example S: Extensive revisions 164 Example T: Canceling (invalidating) a number 167 Glossary of Terms, Abbreviations, and Acronyms 170 Appendix A: Additional Examples of SACO Proposals for New LCSH 176 100 (Personal Name) 176 110 (Corporate Name) 178 130 (Uniform Title) 180 150 (Topical Term) 181 151 (Geographic Name) 195 Appendix B: MARC Organization Codes Used in Examples 200 Index to New Subject Proposal Examples 201 Index to Change Proposal Examples 203 Index to Classification Proposal Examples 204 Index 205 iii Acknowledgments Numerous people deserve thanks for their encouragement and help with this project. The University of Washington Libraries supported my work on this book and served as a testing laboratory for some of its parts. Carolyn Aamot, Lili Angel, Kathleen Forsythe, Gloria Jeffcott, Allen Maberry, and Barbara Petite of the Monographic Services Division all provided invaluable technical support. Several people reviewed an early draft of the manual and provided important feedback: Linda Gabel and Susan Westberg at OCLC; Bruce Trumble of Harvard University; Cecilia Botero, University of Florida. Helpful comments and criticisms of a later draft were provided by Lori Robare and Carol Hixson of the University of Oregon. Carol, in her role as chair of the PCC Standing Committee on Training, encouraged me to take my time and do things right, which I hope she and others will agree I have done. This work would not be what it is were it not for the support and guidance of colleagues at the Library of Congress. Ruta Penkiunas, Ana Cristán, and John Mitchell of the Cooperative Cataloging Team all provided feedback and helped in innumerable ways. In particular, much of what I've learned about SACO and how to create good proposals has come from John Mitchell, who has been my SACO liaison at LC for many years. I've learned much from John's wise and thoughtful counsel. The staff in LC's Cataloging Policy and Support Office have been an enormous help in making this manual as useful and accurate as I hope it is. Detailed comments, corrections, and suggestions were received from Larry Buzard, Lynn El-Hoshy, Ron Goudreau, Mary Kay Pietris, and Millie Wewerka. In particular, Lynn El-Hoshy went over the manuscript with a fine-tooth comb, catching typos, errors, and misunderstandings large and small, and educating me about LC policy and practice in the process. Lynn's extensive suggestions have made the manual much better than it would otherwise have been. Lynn has long been an important mentor to me, always willing to take time to engage in discussions and explanations of LC subject cataloging policy in person and over email. Any errors of omission or commission are mine, and I would appreciate learning of them so that they can be corrected in a future edition. Adam L. Schiff Principal Cataloger University of Washington Libraries Monographic Services Division Box 352900 Seattle, WA 98195-2900 USA Phone: (206) 543-8409 Fax: (206) 685-8782 Email: [email protected] iv Introduction Introduction The Library of Congress (LC) is involved with a number of different cooperative cataloging enterprises. The Subject Authority Cooperative Program (SACO) is one of these projects. SACO is one of the four constituents of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), the others being NACO (Name Authority Cooperative Project), CONSER (Cooperative Online Serials Program), and BIBCO (bibliographic component). SACO was established to provide a means for libraries to propose new Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and LC Classification (LCC) numbers. It also allows libraries to submit change proposals for existing subject headings and classification. Proposals are submitted through the Regional and Cooperative Cataloging Division at LC and are reviewed weekly by the Cataloging Policy and Support Office. Approved subject headings are distributed as subject authority records by the Cataloging Distribution Service (CDS) to bibliographic utilities and other subscribers and are included in the printed Library of Congress Subject Headings that is published annually. Approved classification proposals are incorporated into the LC Classification schedules. This manual is intended as an overview of SACO policies and procedures and as a guide to creating SACO proposals. It is not intended to replace essential existing documentation such as the Subject Cataloging Manual. Although information from the Subject Cataloging Manual is included throughout, this manual frequently refers the user to the more detailed information and explanations found there, expecting that catalogers will consult it as necessary. Almost all examples included within this manual are taken from actual headings and classification numbers proposed or modified by SACO participants. There are no formal training requirements for participation in SACO. However, libraries making proposals are expected to have access to and familiarity with the key documentation containing the policies and practices used by LC in subject heading and classification assignment and in the creation of new subject headings and classification numbers. Any library may submit just one or many proposals. The library must have a MARC organization code (formerly called NUC symbol or USMARC code) assigned to it by the Library of Congress, or for Canadian libraries, by the National Library of Canada. A complete list of MARC organization codes is available at http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/organizations/ along with information on how to request a new code. Instructions for requesting a code from the National Library of Canada may be found at http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/pubs/ill/eillse_3.htm#3.2.2. LC staff provide free general and specialized SACO training at workshops held during conferences of the American Library Association and other organizations. While these workshops are not required in order to participate in the SACO program, catalogers interested in further training are encouraged to register for them. Announcements of workshops are made on electronic discussion lists such as AUTOCAT and on the SACO home page. 1 Introduction There is an electronic discussion list for SACO, called appropriately enough, SACOLIST.
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas Mikel R
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 31 1977 Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas Mikel R. Shinn Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Geomorphology Commons, and the Stratigraphy Commons Recommended Citation Shinn, Mikel R. (1977) "Geologic Mapping from Aerial Photography in the Boston Mountains, Northwestern Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 31. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/31 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 31 Geologic Mapping from AerialPhotography in The Boston Mountains, Northwest Arkansas MIKELR.SHINN Department of Geology, University ofArkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 ABSTRACT Aerial photography has been employed to map stratigraphic and structural features in the Boston Mountains of Washington and Crawford Counties, Arkansas. Exposures of resis- tant stratigraphic units within the lower Atoka Formation were delineated on a series of large scale aerial photographs over an area of about 150 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, Aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36Th Street, Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission December 15, 1998, Designation List 300 LP-2027 GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36th Street, Manhattan. Built 1904-1906; architect Stanford White of McKim, Mead and White. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 837, Lot 48. On September 15, 1998, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Gorham Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Seven witnesses representing Manhattan Community Board 5, the Murray Hill Association, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Beaux Arts Alliance, the Society for the Architecture of the City, the Municipal Art Society, and the Historic Districts Council spoke in favor of designation. The owner of the building submitted a letter asking that the hearing be adjourned to another date. The hearing was closed with the proviso that it could be reopened at a later date if the owner wished to testify. The owner subsequently declined to do so. There were no speakers in opposition to this designation. The Commission also has received a letter in support of the designation from a local resident. Summary This elegant commercial building, constructed in 1904-05 for the Gorham Manufacturing Company, contained its wholesale and retail showrooms, offices, and workshops. Designed by Stanford White of the prominent architectural firm of McKim, Mead & White, the eight-story building is an adaptation of an early Florentine Renaissance sty le palazzo incorporating a two-story arcade, a four-story mid-section, and a two-story loggia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bimt Seminar Handout
    Bringing the Bible to LifeSeminar Physical Settings of the Bible Seminar Topics Session I: Introduction - “Physical Settings of the Bible” Session II: “Connecting the Dots” - Geography of Israel Session III: Archaeology & the Bible Session IV: Life & Ministry of Jesus Session V: Jerusalem in the Old Testament Session VI: Jerusalem in the Days of Jesus Session VII: Manners & Customs of the Bible Goals & Objectives • To gain a new and exciting “3-D” perspective of the land of the Bible. • To begin understanding the “playing board” of the Bible. • To pursue the adventure of “connecting the dots” between the ancient world of the Bible and Scripture. • To appreciate the context of the stories of the Bible, including the life and ministry of Jesus. • To grow in our walk of faith with the God of redemptive history. 2 Bringing the Bible to Life Seminar About Biblical Israel Ministries & Tours Biblical Israel Ministries & Tours (BIMT) was created 25 years ago (originally called Biblical Israel Tours) out of a passion for leading people to a personalized study tour experience of Israel, the land of the Bible. The ministry expanded in 2016. BIMT is now a support-based evangelical support-based non-profit 501c3 tax-exempt ministry dedicated to helping people “connect the dots” between the context of the ancient world of the Bible and Scripture. The two-fold purpose of BIMT is: 1. Leading highly biblical study-discipleship tours to Israel and other lands of the Bible, and 2. Providing “Physical Settings of the Bible” teaching and discipleship training for churches and schools. It is our prayer that BIMT helps people to not only grow in a deeper understanding (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Herod's Temple Mount in Jerusalem
    Reconstructing Herod’s Temple Mount in Jerusalem By Kathleen RitmeyerLeen Ritmeyer Herod the Great—master builder! Despite his crimes and excesses, no one can doubt his prowess as a builder. One of his most imposing achievements was in Jerusalem. To feed his passion for grandeur, to immortalize his name and to attempt to win the loyalty of his sometimes restive Jewish subjects, Herod rebuilt the Temple (1 on the reconstruction drawing) in lavish fashion. But first he extended the existing platform—the Temple Mount—on which it was built, doubling its size. Herod ruled from 37 to 4 B.C. Scarcely a generation after the completion of this unparalleled building project,a the Romans ploughed the Temple Mount and built a temple to Jupiter on the site. Not a trace of Herod’s Temple was left. The mighty retaining walls of the Temple Mount, however, were deliberately left lying in ruins throughout the Roman (70–324 A.D.) and Byzantine (324–640 A.D.) periods—testimony to the destruction of the Jewish state. The Islamic period (640–1099) brought further eradication of Herod’s glory. Although the Omayyad caliphs (whose dynasty lasted from 633 to 750) repaired a large breach in the southern wall of the Temple Mount, the entire area of the Mount and its immediate surroundings was covered by an extensive new religio-political complex, built in part from Herodian ashlars that the Romans had toppled. Still later, the Crusaders (1099–1291) erected a city wall in the south that required blocking up the southern gates to the Temple Mount.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Ave Noise Assessment
    Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant for the Lexington Avenue Subway Line between the 33rd Street/Park Avenue South Station and the Grand Central Station/42nd Street Station July 2017 MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line This page intentionally blank. MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line COVER SHEET Document: Final Environmental Impact Statement Project Title: Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant for the Lexington Avenue Subway Line between 33rd Street/Park Avenue South Station and the Grand Central Terminal/42nd Street Station Location: The Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant would be located in the streetbed of Park Avenue between East 36th Street and East 39th Street, New York City, New York County, New York Lead Agency: Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City Transit (MTA NYCT), 2 Broadway, New York, NY 10004 Lead Agency Contact: Mr. Emil F. Dul P.E., Principal Environmental Engineer, New York City Transit, phone 646-252-2405 Prepared by: Michael Tumulty, Vice President STV Group; Steven P. Scalici, STV Group; Patrick J. O’Mara, STV Group; Douglas S. Swan, STV Group; Niek Veraart, Vice President, Louis Berger; G. Douglas Pierson, Louis Berger; Leo Tidd, Louis Berger; Jonathan Carey, Louis Berger; Steve Bedford, Louis Berger; Allison Fahey, Louis Berger; Cece Saunders, President, Historical Perspectives, Inc.; Faline Schneiderman, Historical Perspectives, Inc. Date of
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of New England Forested Land Cover, Nutrient-Poor Frigid and Cryic Soils (Mostly Spodosols), and Numerous High-Gradient Streams and Glacial Lakes
    58. Northeastern Highlands The Northeastern Highlands ecoregion covers most of the northern and mountainous parts of New England as well as the Adirondacks in New York. It is a relatively sparsely populated region compared to adjacent regions, and is characterized by hills and mountains, a mostly Ecoregions of New England forested land cover, nutrient-poor frigid and cryic soils (mostly Spodosols), and numerous high-gradient streams and glacial lakes. Forest vegetation is somewhat transitional between the boreal regions to the north in Canada and the broadleaf deciduous forests to the south. Typical forest types include northern hardwoods (maple-beech-birch), northern hardwoods/spruce, and northeastern spruce-fir forests. Recreation, tourism, and forestry are primary land uses. Farm-to-forest conversion began in the 19th century and continues today. In spite of this trend, Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and 5 level III ecoregions and 40 level IV ecoregions in the New England states and many Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. alluvial valleys, glacial lake basins, and areas of limestone-derived soils are still farmed for dairy products, forage crops, apples, and potatoes. In addition to the timber industry, recreational homes and associated lodging and services sustain the forested regions economically, but quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states or provinces. they also create development pressure that threatens to change the pastoral character of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of Cyberterrorism: an Argument for Anticipating Cyber-Attacks
    IN DEFENSE OF CYBERTERRORISM: AN ARGUMENT FOR ANTICIPATING CYBER-ATTACKS Susan W. Brenner Marc D. Goodman The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States brought the notion of terrorism as a clear and present danger into the consciousness of the American people. In order to predict what might follow these shocking attacks, it is necessary to examine the ideologies and motives of their perpetrators, and the methodologies that terrorists utilize. The focus of this article is on how Al-Qa'ida and other Islamic fundamentalist groups can use cyberspace and technology to continue to wage war againstthe United States, its allies and its foreign interests. Contending that cyberspace will become an increasingly essential terrorist tool, the author examines four key issues surrounding cyberterrorism. The first is a survey of conventional methods of "physical" terrorism, and their inherent shortcomings. Next, a discussion of cyberspace reveals its potential advantages as a secure, borderless, anonymous, and structured delivery method for terrorism. Third, the author offers several cyberterrorism scenarios. Relating several examples of both actual and potential syntactic and semantic attacks, instigated individually or in combination, the author conveys their damagingpolitical and economic impact. Finally, the author addresses the inevitable inquiry into why cyberspace has not been used to its full potential by would-be terrorists. Separately considering foreign and domestic terrorists, it becomes evident that the aims of terrorists must shift from the gross infliction of panic, death and destruction to the crippling of key information systems before cyberattacks will take precedence over physical attacks. However, given that terrorist groups such as Al Qa'ida are highly intelligent, well-funded, and globally coordinated, the possibility of attacks via cyberspace should make America increasingly vigilant.
    [Show full text]
  • ARKANSAS-BOSTON MOUNTAINS CHAPTER the Missouri & Louisiana Railroad
    Volume 31, No. 5 January 2018 Official Monthly Publication of the ARKANSAS-BOSTON MOUNTAINS CHAPTER NATIONAL RAILWAY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Chapter No. 188 founded in 1987 2018 DIRECTORY OF OFFICERS President Bob Stark Vice President Al Kaeppel Secretary Malcolm Cleaveland Treasurer Tom Duggan Nominations Bill Merrifield National Director Ken Eddy Board Director Gary McCullah Editor Mike Sypult The Missouri & Louisiana Railroad - 1902-1914 M&L Mogul #114 builder photo at Baldwin Locomotive Works in August 1912. – John Dill collection Page 1 - THE ARKANSAS SCRAMBLER January 2018 The Missouri & Louisiana Railroad Arkansas well, a well-known Kansas City Banker. Stilwell was Branch already in the railroad business by this date and his By John Dill railroads all needed a reliable, relatively inexpensive supply of coal. Stilwell and his associates were then How do you write about a virtually unknown railroad in the process of assembling what would become the that does not fit well into any category that would nor- Kansas City, Pittsburg & Gulf Railroad, the predeces- mally be used to classify a railroad? The Missouri sor of the Kansas City Southern. Within only a few and Louisiana Railroad is the railroad in question. years, Central was heavily involved in the regional Have you ever heard of it? Few have. This article is coal business, mostly in Kansas and Missouri. Lum- as much an appeal to readers for information as a re- ber operations began near Texarkana in southern Ar- cital of the painfully limited knowledge of the author. kansas in January of 1894. A large amount of this Don’t get me wrong, the Missouri and Louisiana was lumber business soon became the production of rail- a very interesting, small but semi-important railroad in road ties and bridge timbers.
    [Show full text]
  • BROWN GELDING 1 (Branded Nr Sh
    Barn D Stable 55 On Account of CHEVAL THOROUGHBREDS, Tooradin Lot 1 BROWN GELDING 1 (Branded nr sh. off sh. Foaled 15th October 2015) 5 Perugino (USA) ...............by Danzig ..................... Testa Rossa .................... SIRE Bo Dapper ................. by Sir Dapper .............. UNENCUMBERED ..... More Than Ready (USA) by Southern Halo ......... Blizzardly ....................... Concise ...................... by Marscay .................. Alannon ...................... by Noalcoholic (Fr) ........ DAM Falvelon .......................... Devil's Zephyr ............ by Zephyr Zing (NZ) .... QUEEN FALVELON ..... Leo Castelli ................ by Sovereign Dancer .... 2004 Queen Castelli (USA) ...... Queen Alexandra ........ by Determined King ..... UNENCUMBERED (AUS) (Bay or Brown 2011-Stud 2014). 5 wins at 2, A$1,908,850, BRC BJ McLachlan S., Gr.3, GCTC Magic Millions 2YO Classic, RL, Wyong Magic Millions 2YO Classic, RL, ATC Ascend Sale Trophies 2YO P., Sharp 2YO P., 2d ATC Todman S., Gr.2. Out of SW Blizzardly (AJC Keith Mackay H., L). Related to SW Rembetica (NSW Tatt's RC Tramway H., Gr.3) and SW Sober Dancer. His oldest progeny are 2YOs. 1st Dam QUEEN FALVELON, by Falvelon. 2 wins at 2 at 1113, 1200m, MRC Holmesglen 2YO H., 3d MRC Canonise 2YO H. This is her fifth foal. Her fourth foal is an unraced 3YO. Dam of 1 foal to race, 1 winner- Young Farrelly (g by Estambul (ARG)). 3 wins at 1008m. 2nd Dam Queen Castelli (USA), by Leo Castelli. 3 wins at 6f, 8¼f, 3d Meadowlands Bloomfield College S., L. Dam of 6 named foals, all raced, 4 winners- Gabrieli. Winner at 1000m, MRC Brava Jeannie H. Dam of 4 winners- Tariana (f Anabaa (USA)). 6 wins 1100 to 1209m, $287,220, MVRC LF Signs H., MRC Hayman Island H., Ken Sturt H., John Moule H., 2d TRC Bow Mistress Trophy, Gr 3, MRC Ricoh H., 3d TTC Vamos S., L.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossroads 360 Virtual Tour Script Edited
    Crossroads of Civilization Virtual Tour Script Note: Highlighted text signifies content that is only accessible on the 360 Tour. Welcome to Crossroads of Civilization. We divided this exhibit not by time or culture, but rather by traits that are shared by all civilizations. Watch this video to learn more about the making of Crossroads and its themes. Entrance Crossroads of Civilization: Ancient Worlds of the Near East and Mediterranean Crossroads of Civilization looks at the world's earliest major societies. Beginning more than 5,000 years ago in Egypt and the Near East, the exhibit traces their developments, offshoots, and spread over nearly four millennia. Interactive timelines and a large-scale digital map highlight the ebb and flow of ancient cultures, from Egypt and the earliest Mesopotamian kingdoms of the Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians, to the vast Persian, Hellenistic, and finally Roman empires, the latter eventually encompassing the entire Mediterranean region. Against this backdrop of momentous historical change, items from the Museum's collections are showcased within broad themes. Popular elements from classic exhibits of former years, such as our Greek hoplite warrior and Egyptian temple model, stand alongside newly created life-size figures, including a recreation of King Tut in his chariot. The latest research on our two Egyptian mummies features forensic reconstructions of the individuals in life. This truly was a "crossroads" of cultural interaction, where Asian, African, and European peoples came together in a massive blending of ideas and technologies. Special thanks to the following for their expertise: ● Dr. Jonathan Elias - Historical and maps research, CT interpretation ● Dr.
    [Show full text]