Park Ave Noise Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Park Ave Noise Assessment Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant for the Lexington Avenue Subway Line between the 33rd Street/Park Avenue South Station and the Grand Central Station/42nd Street Station July 2017 MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line This page intentionally blank. MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line COVER SHEET Document: Final Environmental Impact Statement Project Title: Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant for the Lexington Avenue Subway Line between 33rd Street/Park Avenue South Station and the Grand Central Terminal/42nd Street Station Location: The Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant would be located in the streetbed of Park Avenue between East 36th Street and East 39th Street, New York City, New York County, New York Lead Agency: Metropolitan Transportation Authority New York City Transit (MTA NYCT), 2 Broadway, New York, NY 10004 Lead Agency Contact: Mr. Emil F. Dul P.E., Principal Environmental Engineer, New York City Transit, phone 646-252-2405 Prepared by: Michael Tumulty, Vice President STV Group; Steven P. Scalici, STV Group; Patrick J. O’Mara, STV Group; Douglas S. Swan, STV Group; Niek Veraart, Vice President, Louis Berger; G. Douglas Pierson, Louis Berger; Leo Tidd, Louis Berger; Jonathan Carey, Louis Berger; Steve Bedford, Louis Berger; Allison Fahey, Louis Berger; Cece Saunders, President, Historical Perspectives, Inc.; Faline Schneiderman, Historical Perspectives, Inc. Date of Lead Agency Acceptance: July 5, 2017 MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line This page intentionally blank. MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line FOREWORD A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) has been completed by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) New York City Transit (NYCT) for the Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant for the Lexington Avenue Subway Line tunnel segment between the 33rd Street/Park Avenue South Station and the Grand Central Terminal/42nd Street Station. This FEIS was prepared pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review (SEQR), Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL §§ 8-0101 et seq.) and its implementing regulations, Title 6 NYCRR §617. This FEIS addresses the comments received during the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) comment period, including written and oral testimony received at the DEIS Public Hearing. The FEIS identifies the comments received, and provides responses in Appendix A: Response to Comments. In addition, several chapters of the DEIS have been revised, where appropriate, in response to the comments received. Updates, revisions, and additions to the document since the publication of the DEIS are double- underlined in this FEIS. This FEIS identifies a Preferred Alternative in Chapter 3: Alternatives. MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line This page intentionally blank. MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ ix LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. xi LIST OF ACRONYMS ......................................................................................................................... xiii SUMMARY OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT ..................................................... xv 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Identification of the Proposed Action ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Problem Identification ............................................................................................................. 1-2 System Deficiencies ................................................................................................... 1-4 National Fire Protection Association Conformance .................................................. 1-4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Project Goals ............................................................................................................................ 1-6 2.0 PROCEDURAL AND ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK .........................................................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Alternative 11 ............................................................................................................ 2-1 Alternative 11A .......................................................................................................... 2-3 Alternative 12 ............................................................................................................ 2-3 Alternative 12A .......................................................................................................... 2-6 2.2 Required Approvals and Agency Coordination ........................................................................ 2-6 2.3 Environmental Review Process ................................................................................................ 2-8 Establishing a Lead Agency ........................................................................................ 2-8 Determination of Significance ................................................................................... 2-8 Scoping ...................................................................................................................... 2-9 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) ......................................................... 2-9 Public Review .......................................................................................................... 2-10 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) ......................................................... 2-10 Statement of Findings ............................................................................................. 2-10 2.4 Framework for Environmental Analysis ................................................................................. 2-11 Scope of Environmental Analysis ............................................................................ 2-11 Periods of Analysis................................................................................................... 2-11 Definition of Study Areas ........................................................................................ 2-12 Definition of Baseline Conditions and the No Action Alternative ........................... 2-12 Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 2-12 Cumulative Effects Assessment ............................................................................... 2-13 Construction Environmental Protection Plan/ISO 14000 Standards/State Smart Growth Public Infrastructure Policy Act ....................................................... 2-13 2.5 Operational and Emergency Level Analyses and Analyses Not Included .............................. 2-15 2.6 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................... 2-16 3.0 ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Public Input to Development of Project Alternatives .............................................................. 3-2 Final Environmental Impact Statement i MTA New York City Transit Proposed Emergency Ventilation Plant Lexington Avenue Subway Line 3.3 Project Alternatives Considered .............................................................................................. 3-2 Preliminary Alternatives Screening ........................................................................... 3-3 Preliminary Alternatives Feasibility Evaluation ......................................................... 3-5 Engineering Evaluation of Potential Alternatives ...................................................... 3-9 Environmental Evaluation of Potential Alternatives ............................................... 3-11 Economic Evaluation of Potential Alternatives ....................................................... 3-12 Integrated Engineering/Environmental/Economic Comparative Analysis .............. 3-13 3.4 Alternatives Identified after Issuance of the Final Scoping Document.................................. 3-14 3.5 Description of Alternatives for Detailed Analysis in the FEIS................................................
Recommended publications
  • Programs of Study/Course Descriptions
    Yeshiva University Undergraduate Catalog for Women 2016-2018 Programs of Study & Course Descriptions Programs of Study & Course Descriptions 1 ACCOUNTING (ACC) 3 AMERICAN STUDIES (AMST) 4 ART (ARTS) 5 BIBLE (BIBL) 12 BIOLOGY (BIOL) 18 BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (BUS) 21 BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND MARKETING ANALYTICS (BIMA) 22 BUSINESS LAW (BLW) 22 CHEMISTRY (CHEM) and BIOCHEMISTRY (BC) 23 COMPUTER SCIENCE (COMP) 25 ECONOMICS (ECON) 27 EDUCATION (EDUC) 31 ENGLISH (ENGL) 37 FINANCE (FIN) 45 FRENCH (FREN) 47 HEBREW (HEBR) 48 HEBRAIC STUDIES (HEST) 49 HISTORY (HIST) 50 INFORMATION AND DECISION SCIENCES (IDS) 57 JEWISH EDUCATION (JEDU) 61 JEWISH STUDIES (JST) 62 JEWISH HISTORY (JHIS) 63 JEWISH PHILOSOPHY (JPHI) 66 JUDAIC STUDIES (JUDS) 69 MANAGEMENT (MAN) 74 MARKETING (MAR) 80 MATHEMATICS (MATH) 85 MUSIC (MUSI) 88 OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY 91 PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) 92 PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND ATHLETICS (PEDU) 94 PHYSICAL SCIENCES (PHSC) 95 PHYSICS (PHYS) 95 POLITICAL SCIENCE (POLI) 98 PRE-ENGINEERING 107 PSYCHOLOGY (PSYC) 108 SEMITIC LANGUAGES (SEMI) 114 SHAPED MAJOR 115 SOCIOLOGY (SOCI) 115 SPANISH (SPAN) 119 SPEECH PATHOLOGY/ AUDIOLOGY (SPAU) 119 Page 1 Yeshiva University Undergraduate Catalog for Women 2016-2018 SPEECH AND DRAMA (SPEE) 121 STATISTICS (STAT) 122 TAX (TAX) 122 WRITING (WRIT) 122 WOMEN’S STUDIES (WMNS) 122 Page 2 Yeshiva University Undergraduate Catalog for Women 2016-2018 ACCOUNTING (ACC) MAJOR: Sy Syms School of Business CPA TRACK: ACC 1101, 1102, 2403, 3201, 3601; BLW 2112; TAX 6124, 6125; and any one Sy Syms elective. NON-CPA TRACK: ACC 1101, 1102, 2403, 3201, 3601; one additional ACC/TAX courses and any three additional Sy Syms electives. MINOR: For Sy Syms School of Business students ACC 1101, 1102, and 2403 MINOR: For Stern College Students ACC 1001, 1002, FIN 1001, ACC 1101, 1102, and any other Sy Syms course.
    [Show full text]
  • Rochester Blue Book 1928
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories V,ZP7. ROCHESTER V^SZ 30GIC Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories NASH-GATES CO. NASH DISTRIBUTORS TWO RETAIL STORES 336 EAST AVENUE 775( CULVER ROAD Phones: Stone 804-805 Phones: Culver 2600-2601 32 (Thestnut Street-' M.D.JEFFREYS -^VOCuC^tCt*;TX.TJ. L. M. WEINER THE SPIRIT OF GOOD SERVICE AND UNEQUALED FACILITIES FOR ITS ACCOMPLISHMENT 2 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories 0 UNION ROCHESTER'S best families for over a quarter of a TRUST century have profitably em­ ployed tlie service of this COMPANY fifty-million dollar, five-branch, financial institution. Attractive separate depart­ ments for women. OFFICES Union Trust Building Main St eet at South Avenue Main Street at East Avenue OF Clifford and Joseph Avenues ROCHESTER 4424 Lake Avenue j^+*4^********4-+***+****+*4-+++++*++44'*+****++**-fc*4.*^ (dlfntrp 3Unuimf, 1 ROCHESTER, N,Y Bworattottfl. ijpahttB, Jforttn ani Jfflmuering flanta «S*THpTT,T*,f"f"Wwww**^************^*********^****** * 3 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories |imaiiyMMMMMiu«MM^ Phones: Main 1737-1738 Joseph A. Schantz Co. Furniture, Fire-Proof Storage and Packing of Household Goods AUTO VANS FOR OUT OF TOWN MOVING Office and Salesroom 253 St. Paul, cor. Central Avenue Central Crust Company ROCHESTER, N. Y. The "Friendly" Bank Capital, Surplus and Undivided Profits $1,500,000 Interest Paid on Special Deposits Safe Deposit Boxes for Rent Main Office Brighton Branch 25 MAIN STREET, EAST 1806 EAST AVENUE 4 Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Miscellaneous Directories B.FORMAN CD WOMEN'S, GIRLS' and INFANTS' APPAREL AND ALL ACCESSORIES Clinton Avenue South Rochester, N.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem.
    [Show full text]
  • X SUSAN DULING
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x SUSAN DULING, MARGARET ANDERSON, and LAKEYA SEWER on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, -v- No. 06 Civ. 10197 (LTS)(HBP) GRISTEDE'S OPERATING CORP., et al., Defendants. -------------------------------------------------------x OPINION AND ORDER APPEARANCES: OUTTEN & GOLDEN,LLP MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP By: Adam T. Klein, Esq. By: Michael J. Puma, Esq. Justin M. Swartz, Esq. Amber L. Kagan, Esq. Cara E. Greene, Esq. 101 Park Avenue 3 Park Avenue, 29th Floor New York, New York 10178 New York, New York 10016 FINKEL GOLDSTEIN ROSENBLOOM & NASH LLP By: Kevin J. Nash, Esq. 26 Broadway, Suite 711 New York, NY 10004 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Defendants LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge GRISTEDES CLASS CERT.WPD VERSION 3/8/10 1 Plaintiffs Susan Duling, Margaret Anderson, and Lakeya Sewer (collectively “Plaintiffs”) bring this action on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, asserting intentional discrimination and disparate impact claims for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. L. § 296 et seq. (“NYSHRL”), and the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-101 et seq. (“NYCHRL”), by defendants Gristede’s Operating Corp., Red Apple Group, Inc., d/b/a Gristede’s, Gristede’s Foods, Inc., Gristede’s Delivery Service, Inc., Gristede’s Foods NY, Inc., Gristede’s NY, LLC, Namdor, Inc., and John Catsimatidis (collectively “Gristede’s” or “Defendants”). Sewer also asserts individual claims for interference with her restoration rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, Aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36Th Street, Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission December 15, 1998, Designation List 300 LP-2027 GORHAM BUILDING, 390 Fifth Avenue, aka 386-390 Fifth Avenue and 2-6 West 36th Street, Manhattan. Built 1904-1906; architect Stanford White of McKim, Mead and White. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 837, Lot 48. On September 15, 1998, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Gorham Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Seven witnesses representing Manhattan Community Board 5, the Murray Hill Association, the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Beaux Arts Alliance, the Society for the Architecture of the City, the Municipal Art Society, and the Historic Districts Council spoke in favor of designation. The owner of the building submitted a letter asking that the hearing be adjourned to another date. The hearing was closed with the proviso that it could be reopened at a later date if the owner wished to testify. The owner subsequently declined to do so. There were no speakers in opposition to this designation. The Commission also has received a letter in support of the designation from a local resident. Summary This elegant commercial building, constructed in 1904-05 for the Gorham Manufacturing Company, contained its wholesale and retail showrooms, offices, and workshops. Designed by Stanford White of the prominent architectural firm of McKim, Mead & White, the eight-story building is an adaptation of an early Florentine Renaissance sty le palazzo incorporating a two-story arcade, a four-story mid-section, and a two-story loggia.
    [Show full text]
  • General Info.Indd
    General Information • Landmarks Beyond the obvious crowd-pleasers, New York City landmarks Guggenheim (Map 17) is one of New York’s most unique are super-subjective. One person’s favorite cobblestoned and distinctive buildings (apparently there’s some art alley is some developer’s idea of prime real estate. Bits of old inside, too). The Cathedral of St. John the Divine (Map New York disappear to differing amounts of fanfare and 18) has a very medieval vibe and is the world’s largest make room for whatever it is we’ll be romanticizing in the unfinished cathedral—a much cooler destination than the future. Ain’t that the circle of life? The landmarks discussed eternally crowded St. Patrick’s Cathedral (Map 12). are highly idiosyncratic choices, and this list is by no means complete or even logical, but we’ve included an array of places, from world famous to little known, all worth visiting. Great Public Buildings Once upon a time, the city felt that public buildings should inspire civic pride through great architecture. Coolest Skyscrapers Head downtown to view City Hall (Map 3) (1812), Most visitors to New York go to the top of the Empire State Tweed Courthouse (Map 3) (1881), Jefferson Market Building (Map 9), but it’s far more familiar to New Yorkers Courthouse (Map 5) (1877—now a library), the Municipal from afar—as a directional guide, or as a tip-off to obscure Building (Map 3) (1914), and a host of other court- holidays (orange & white means it’s time to celebrate houses built in the early 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Murray Hill Walking Tour
    AN ARCHITECTURAL WALKING TOUR OF MURRAY HILL HE TOUR BEGINS on the south side of the intersection of an iron fence on the 35th Street side. The 1864 brownstone struc- 23. 149 East 36th Street. A distinctive Georgian style house with TPark Avenue and 37th Street. See #1 on map to begin tour. ture is distinguished by the high arched bays and arched entrance circular-headed multi-paned windows on the parlor floor. An asterisk ( ) next to the number indicates that the building is a porch. The spire was added in 1896. The church interior features 24. 131 East 36th Street. A brownstone converted into a Parisian New York City* Landmark; the year of designation is also included. stained-glass windows by William Morris, Edward Burne-Jones, townhouse by the famous owner/architect William Adams Delano. 1. “Belmont,” Robert Murray House Site. The two-story stone Louis Comfort Tiffany and John La Farge; the oak communion It is characterized by the tall French doors on the second floor and house stood until a fire in 1835, facing east on the present intersec- rail was carved by Daniel Chester the rusticated faux stone at the ground floor. French. tion of Park Avenue and 37th Street. Verandas ran around three 25. 125 East 36th Street. This well preserved narrow brownstone 11. sides of the Georgian-style building and from a roof deck one could * The Collectors Club, 22 East was the first home of newlyweds Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt, see a magnificent view of Manhattan. The grounds were sur- 35th Street (New York City who moved in following their European honeymoon in 1905.
    [Show full text]
  • 193R Application Spreadsheet
    193R Application Spreadsheet GROUP TOTAL ELIGIBLE NUMBER ORIGINAL PRODUCER OR EXPERIENCE INSURANCE STREET AUTO (A) or RATE EFFECTIVE TYPE NUMBER NUMBER OF CURRENT PLAN PRODUCER OR MARKETING REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED COMPANY GROUP NAME ADDRESS CITY/TOWN STATE ZIP CODE HOME (H) DEV. (0.0%) DATE (CU, E, M, U) IN GROUP IN GROUP INSUREDS DATE MARKETING REPRESENTATIVE CONTACT INFORMATION YES OR NO Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 360 Federal Credit Union dba Hamilton Sundstrand FCU 191 Ella Grasso Turnpike Windsor Locks CT 06096 A 5.00% 1/1/2013 CU 17,100 3,596 122 12/1/1998 Cristina Sayre (888)538-2146 or call a Liberty Mutual Sales Office. www.libertymutual.com NO Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 3balls.com, Inc. 220 Nahatan St West Bridgewater MA 02379 A 5.00% 1/1/2013 E 75 75 4 10/17/2011 Shannon Krappe (888)538-2146 or call a Liberty Mutual Sales Office. www.libertymutual.com NO Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 3M Inc. 3M Center St. Paul MN 55144 A 5.00% 1/1/2013 E 55,001 668 51 9/30/2009 Kimberly Knecht (888)538-2146 or call a Liberty Mutual Sales Office. www.libertymutual.com NO Liberty Mutual Insurance Company A123 Systems, Inc. 20 West Street Waltham MA 02451 A 5.00% 1/1/2013 E 1,100 350 1 10/10/2012 Cheryl Mix (888)538-2146 or call a Liberty Mutual Sales Office. www.libertymutual.com NO Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Abbott Laboratories Inc. 4611 N. Ravenswood Ave Chicago IL 60064-6223 A 5.00% 1/1/2013 E 10,000 70 59 5/1/2008 Gail Butler (888)538-2146 or call a Liberty Mutual Sales Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage IA Archaeological Assessment for the 37Th Street Ventilation Facility, East Side Access
    September 2007 Prepared for: MTACC Stage IA Archaeological Assessment for the 37th Street Ventilation Facility, East Side Access New York City, New York Prepared by: Burlington, New Jersey Stage IA Archaeological Assessment for the 37th Street Ventilation Facility, East Side Access New York City, New York Prepared for: MTACC 2Broadway NewYork,NewYork Prepared by: Ingrid Wuebber and Edward Morin, RPA URS Corporation 437 High Street Burlington, New Jersey 08016 609-386-5444 September 2007 STAGE IA ASSESSMENT FOR THE 37TH STREET VENTILATION FACILITY,EAST SIDE ACCESS Abstract URS Corporation conducted a Stage IA archaeological assessment in support of the construction of a proposed 37th Street Ventilation Facility as part of the East Side Access Project, located in the borough of Manhattan. Two options have been proposed for the ventilation facility location. The first option would locate it within the sidewalk on both the northwest and southwest corners, at the intersection of 37th Street and Park Avenue. The second option would locate the facility within the sidewalk on the southwest corner, at the intersection of 37th Street and Park Avenue. The goal of the study was to provide information on the potential for the two project areas to contain intact and original soil surfaces. This information was needed in order to determine if proposed construction activities would extend to a depth that would encounter intact prehistoric and/or historic surfaces that may contain archaeological resources. Background research indicated that pre-European sites on Manhattan are not common, as subsequent development has obliterated them. This appears to be the case in the project area.
    [Show full text]
  • CAREW TOWER-NETHERLAND PLAZA HOTEL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 CAREW TOWER-NETHERLAND PLAZA HOTEL Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: CAREW TOWER-NETHERLAND PLAZA HOTEL Other Name/Site Number: Starrett-Netherland Hotel 2. LOCATION Street & Number: TOWER: West Fifth Street and Fountain Square Not for publication:___ HOTEL: 35 West Fifth Street City/Town: Cincinnati Vicinity:___ State: Ohio County: Hamilton Code: 061 Zip Code: 45202 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): X Public-Local:___ District:___ Public-State:___ Site:___ Public-Federal:___ Structure:___ Object:___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 _____ buildings _____ _____ sites _____ _____ structures _____ _____ objects 1 0 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 CAREW TOWER-NETHERLAND PLAZA HOTEL Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Taxable OMB No
    EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2020 Return of Private Foundation OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury 2019 Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990PF for instructions and the latest information. Open to Public Inspection For calendar year 2019 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number NEWMAN'S OWN FOUNDATION 06-1606588 Number and street (or P.O. box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number ONE MORNINGSIDE DRIVE NORTH 203-222-0136 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here ~ | WESTPORT, CT 06880 G Check all that apply: Initial return Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ~~ | Final return Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name change check here and attach computation ~~~~ | H Check type of organization: X Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here ~ | I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: Cash X Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part II, col. (c), line 16) Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here ~ | | $ 228,783,632.
    [Show full text]
  • Leisure Pass Group
    Explorer Guidebook Empire State Building Attraction status as of Sep 18, 2020: Open Advanced reservations are required. You will not be able to enter the Observatory without a timed reservation. Please visit the Empire State Building's website to book a date and time. You will need to have your pass number to hand when making your reservation. Getting in: please arrive with both your Reservation Confirmation and your pass. To gain access to the building, you will be asked to present your Empire State Building reservation confirmation. Your reservation confirmation is not your admission ticket. To gain entry to the Observatory after entering the building, you will need to present your pass for scanning. Please note: In light of COVID-19, we recommend you read the Empire State Building's safety guidelines ahead of your visit. Good to knows: Free high-speed Wi-Fi Eight in-building dining options Signage available in nine languages - English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Japanese, Korean, and Mandarin Hours of Operation From August: Daily - 11AM-11PM Closings & Holidays Open 365 days a year. Getting There Address 20 West 34th Street (between 5th & 6th Avenue) New York, NY 10118 US Closest Subway Stop 6 train to 33rd Street; R, N, Q, B, D, M, F trains to 34th Street/Herald Square; 1, 2, or 3 trains to 34th Street/Penn Station. The Empire State Building is walking distance from Penn Station, Herald Square, Grand Central Station, and Times Square, less than one block from 34th St subway stop. Top of the Rock Observatory Attraction status as of Sep 18, 2020: Open Getting In: Use the Rockefeller Plaza entrance on 50th Street (between 5th and 6th Avenues).
    [Show full text]