Investigative Reporting and the Meat Industry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Teaching of a Basic Meats Course
173 fZACHlNG A BASIC NEATS COURSZ BY OEWORSTRATlOW TECHNIQUES 0 A, We HULLINS .*...--..-*.-..*.*...*...........-.*-...UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI I find myself in a very awkward situation. In the first place I am following a very noted person, Mr. Ken Warner on the program, who is an authority on teaching methods, and secondly, I am talking to a group of very competent teachers with much more experience in the teaching profession than I have had. However, I would like to present to you our method of teaching a basic meats course at Missouri. Later, we would welcome any comments or questions in the way of constructive criticism or otherwise that any of you might have. First, I would libe to give you an idea of the amount of class hours involved in our basic course and the objectives we have outlined. Our basic meat classes meet 3-2 hour periods per week. These periods are arranged for either a laboratory period or a lecture period, Bowever, in the past it has evolved around one lecture period and two laboratory periods. Our ob- jectives in the course are to familiarize the student with the livestock and meat industry relationships, i.e. live animal carcass comparison, slaughter- ing, cutting, curing and smoking? identification, selection, processing, dis- tribution, utilization of meat and meat products. As more and more subJect material became available in these areas, we found we did not have time to present the students with the subject matter and still do the amount of slaughtering and processing that had been done in the past. -
CANADA Province of Quebec District of Québec Division
C A N A D A S U P E R I O R C O U R T Province of Quebec (Commercial Division) District of Québec Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Division No.: 01-Montréal Court No.: 500-11-055629-188 Estate No.: 41-2449058 IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL OF: 2964-3277 QUEBEC INC. (DBA CARPET ART DECO) legal person duly incorporated under the laws of Canada, having its registered office at 480 Lafleur, Montreal QC H8R 3H9 Petitioner / Debtor -and- RICHTER ADVISORY GROUP INC. Proposal Trustee FIRST REPORT OF THE TRUSTEE ON THE STATE OF PETITIONER’S BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS Richter Advisory Group Inc. (“Richter” or the “Proposal Trustee”), in its capacity as trustee with respect to the Notice of Intention to Make a Proposal (“NOI”) filed by 2964-3277 Quebec Inc., doing business as Carpet Art Deco (the “Debtor” or the “Company”), an insolvent person, does hereby report to the Court the following: INTRODUCTION 1. On November 29, 2018, the Debtor filed the NOI in accordance with Section 50.4(1) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S. C. 1985, c. B.-3, as amended (the “BIA”), and Richter was appointed as Proposal Trustee under the NOI. A copy of the Certificate of Filing issued by the Superintendent of Bankruptcy is annexed hereto as Exhibit “A”. 2. On December 5, 2018, documents were sent by regular mail to all creditors of the Debtor, as identified by it, which included a copy of the Debtor’s NOI, as annexed hereto as Exhibit “B”. -
Plant-Based Meat Mind Maps
PLANT-BASED MEAT MIND MAPS: AN EXPLORATION OF OPTIONS, IDEAS, AND INDUSTRY Christie Lagally Senior Scientist, The Good Food Institute Erin Rees Clayton, Ph.D. Scientifc Foundations Liaison, The Good Food Institute Liz Specht, Ph.D. Senior Scientist, The Good Food Institute SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 GFI is a 501(c)(3) nonproft working to create a healthy, humane, and sustainable food supply. GFI is committed to democratizing scientifc information that will help move our food system away from factory farming and toward better alternatives. I. AN INTRODUCTION TO MIND MAPS: CONCEPTUALIZING GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES A mind map provides a visual representation of critical technologies in an emerging industry to identify gaps in research and development as well as opportunities for strategic industry partnerships. This paper presents established, emerging, and speculative opportunities for plant-based meat sourcing, creation, processing, and distribution through two schematics: the plant-based meat product mind map, which surveys the types of meat analogues that have the potential to replace meat; and the plant-based meat technology mind map, which outlines areas of research and innovation that will accelerate the sector’s ability to compete for market share of the meat industry. The end goal of producing more and better plant-based meat products is to decrease consumption of animal meat products at all levels of quality and price, from steaks to processed meat. Therefore, some of the opportunities and recommendations presented here may apply to only certain types of products or manufacturing methods. For replacement to be successful, in addition to the scientifc and technological opportunities discussed below, we must consider the nutritional profles of various types of plant-based meat and their comparability to the animal products they are designed to replace. -
The New U.S. Meat Industry
Barkema/Drabenstott.qxd 6/21/01 1:37 PM Page 33 The New U.S. Meat Industry By Alan Barkema, Mark Drabenstott, and Nancy Novack new meat industry is rapidly emerging in the United States, as food retailers, meat processors, and farms and ranches coalesce Ainto fewer and larger businesses. The industry’s rapid consolida- tion in recent years has triggered alarms that the industry’s new giants in retailing and processing could drive up food prices for consumers and drive down livestock prices for producers. How should public policy respond to the industry’s consolidation? And how can all participants in the industry—producers, processors, retailers, and consumers—benefit from its new structure? This article studies the striking changes in the meat industry in three steps. First it describes how the industry is changing. Then it examines the forces driving the industry’s consolidation. Finally, it con- siders how consumers and industry participants are affected. While cur- rent evidence is scant that market power has hurt either consumers or producers, the industry’s rapid consolidation nevertheless warrants vigi- lance. At the same time, public policy might also play a role in ensuring that all participants in the market benefit from its new structure. All three authors are members of the bank’s Center for the Study of Rural America. Alan Barkema is vice president and economist, Mark Drabenstott is vice president and director, and Nancy Novack is a research associate. Kate Sheaff, a research associate in the Center, helped prepare the article. The article is on the bank’s web site at www.kc.frb.org. -
Insights of Innovation and Competitiveness in Meat Supply Chains
OPEN ACCESS International Food and Agribusiness Management Review Please citeVolume this article 19 Issue as 'in 4, press'; 2016; DOI: 10.22434/IFAMR2018.0031 Received: 24 February 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 Insights of innovation and competitiveness in meat supply chains REVIEW ARTICLE Alice Munz Fernandes a, Odilene de Souza Teixeirab, Heitor Vieira Riosa, Maria Eugênia Andrighetto Canozzic, Glauco Schultzd and Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellose a Researcher, Center of Agribusiness Studies – CEPAN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (UFRGS), Avenue Bento Gonçalves 7712, CEP 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil b Researcher, Department of Animal Science (Zootecnia), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Avenue Bento Gonçalves 7712, CEP 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil c Researcher, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA). Programa Producción de Carne y Lana. Estación Experimental INIA La Estanzuela. Ruta 50 km 11, 39173, Colonia, Uruguay d Professor, Department of Economic Science and Center of Agribusinnes Studies – CEPAN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (UFRGS), Avenue João Pessoa 52, CEP 90040-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil e Professor, Department of Animal Science (Zootecnia) and Center of Agribusinnes Studies – CEPAN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Avenue Bento Gonçalves 7712, CEP 91540-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil Abstract The world demand for food in parallel with environmental concerns is a paradigm for the competitiveness of agro-industrial production chains. The present study intended to propose insights on the contribution of innovation and competitiveness in meat production chains. A systematic review of the literature was carried out, considering manuscripts published in the Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct databases. -
Industrial Agriculture, Livestock Farming and Climate Change
Industrial Agriculture, Livestock Farming and Climate Change Global Social, Cultural, Ecological, and Ethical Impacts of an Unsustainable Industry Prepared by Brighter Green and the Global Forest Coalition (GFC) with inputs from Biofuelwatch Photo: Brighter Green 1. Modern Livestock Production: Factory Farming and Climate Change For many, the image of a farmer tending his or her crops and cattle, with a backdrop of rolling fields and a weathered but sturdy barn in the distance, is still what comes to mind when considering a question that is not asked nearly as often as it should be: Where does our food come from? However, this picture can no longer be relied upon to depict the modern, industrial food system, which has already dominated food production in the Global North, and is expanding in the Global South as well. Due to the corporate take-over of food production, the small farmer running a family farm is rapidly giving way to the large-scale, factory farm model. This is particularly prevalent in the livestock industry, where thousands, sometimes millions, of animals are raised in inhumane, unsanitary conditions. These operations, along with the resources needed to grow the grain and oil meals (principally soybeans and 1 corn) to feed these animals place intense pressure on the environment. This is affecting some of the world’s most vulnerable ecosystems and human communities. The burdens created by the spread of industrialized animal agriculture are wide and varied—crossing ecological, social, and ethical spheres. These are compounded by a lack of public awareness and policy makers’ resistance to seek sustainable solutions, particularly given the influence of the global corporations that are steadily exerting greater control over the world’s food systems and what ends up on people’s plates. -
Membership Directory Is Designed to Help Connect You with AMI Staff and with Others in the Industry Who Have Also Chosen to Invest in the Institute
SPRING 2010 Membership D i r e c t o r y AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE J. Patrick Boyle President and CEO Dear AMI Member, For more than a century, the American Meat Institute (AMI) has strived to provide effective representation in Washington before Congress and the regulatory agencies. We also speak on behalf of the industry to the media, professional organizations and in other public forums. Our experts manage a comprehensive research agenda, advocate for free and open trade, and organize a host of educational and networking opportunities. While many things have changed in the 104 years since our founding, there are some constants too, like our commitment to represent this great industry of ours honestly and effectively in Washington DC. We are proud that the Institute is the industry’s oldest and largest trade association. Our longevity and our size can be attributed to the diversity amongst our member companies. While we are fortunate to represent many large, multi-national companies, our greatest strength and political credibility comes from our many small and medium sized companies who call AMI their association. In fact, 80 percent of our members are actually small and medium sized companies. We believe the industry benefits when diverse companies with unique ideas and expertise collaborate to make our industry better and our Institute stronger. This AMI membership directory is designed to help connect you with AMI staff and with others in the industry who have also chosen to invest in the Institute. We believe that we succeed when you succeed. Please let us know how we may be of service to you. -
Red Meat Processing Sector
Work, skills and training in the Australian red meat processing sector WORKPLACE RESEARCH CENTRE, UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY Kent Norton Mike Rafferty A NATIONAL VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING RESEARCH AND EVALUATION PROGRAM REPORT NCVER Work, skills and training in the Australian red meat processing sector Kent Norton Mike Rafferty Workplace Research Centre, University of Sydney The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the author/project team and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australian Government, state and territory governments or NCVER Any interpretation of data is the responsibility of the author/project team Publisher’s note To find other material of interest, search VOCED (the UNESCO/NCVER international database <http://www.voced.edu.au>) using the following keywords: industry restucturing; skill development; workforce development; workplace change. © Commonwealth of Australia, 2010 This work has been produced by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) under the National Vocational Education and Training Research and Evaluation (NVETRE) Program, which is coordinated and managed by NCVER on behalf of the Australian Government and state and territory governments. Funding is provided through the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Requests should be made to NCVER. The NVETRE program is based upon priorities approved by ministers with responsibility for vocational education and training (VET). This research aims to improve policy and practice in the VET sector. For further information about the program go to the NCVER website <http://www. -
The Integration of Blockchain Technology to the Beef Industry – a Comparative Analysis
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Social Impact Research Experience (SIRE) Wharton Undergraduate Research 10-31-2019 The Integration of Blockchain Technology to the Beef Industry – A Comparative Analysis Cole N. Hancock University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/sire Part of the Agribusiness Commons, Agricultural Economics Commons, Beef Science Commons, E- Commerce Commons, Food Processing Commons, Food Security Commons, Food Studies Commons, Meat Science Commons, Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Hancock, Cole N., "The Integration of Blockchain Technology to the Beef Industry – A Comparative Analysis" (2019). Social Impact Research Experience (SIRE). 71. https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/71 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/sire/71 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Integration of Blockchain Technology to the Beef Industry – A Comparative Analysis Abstract This paper seeks to explore the different plausible and implemented applications of blockchain technology in the beef industry in two representative markets: The United States and Kenya. Previous papers discuss implementation of blockchain to the beef industry, without a focus on the variations between beef industries and supply chains in various countries, a gap this paper aims to address. The main method of research has been primary, traveling to these countries and engaging in conversations with various stakeholders about their industry’s supply chain and the problems and opportunities therein. Overall this paper finds that the integration of blockchain to the beef industry is broadly advisable, but that the most pragmatic and achievable uses and means of blockchain integration vary widely based on the stage of development and regulatory environment of different country’s beef industries. -
The Importance of Global Meat Demand
Drivers of Global Meat Demand Kevin Grier Senior Market Analyst George Morris Centre Economic Research into the Canadian Agriculture and Food Industry Independent • Financially • Structurally • Research Perspective Areas of Activity • Contract Research • Market Analysis • Education 3 What does Market Analyst Do? • Information gathering • Analysis • Statistical relationships • Trends • Weighting factors • Projections and Forecasts • Competitive Intelligence (Action) Technology Practices: doing it better through science Products: using new and better tools, equipment Genetics: improving plants and animals that we grow Science and Technology…in the supply chain Retailers Producers Packers and Food Consumers Services Animal and Meat Science Much more than an Integral, pervasive industry and leading role supplier: within the livestock and meat industry Purpose… Illustrate the drivers of global meat markets and the demonstrate the central role of science and technology. Outline… Resources • Canadian advantages Demand Technology • Market forces • Importance and challenges Canadian Meat Industry Determinants of demand Quality Quantity Demand (Need) Main Drivers of Food Demand Population growth •Food QUANTITY is Income growth more important •Food QUALITY becomes more important Population is growing • World population is expected to reach 9.1 B by year 2050 Source: United Nations World Population Prospects Database Each year… …there is additional 75 million people to feed About 2 About 75 Canada(s) Saskatchewan(s) Source: United Nations after Potash -
Innovation Versus Imitation Choices Amid Technological Turbulence and Intense Competition: Evidence from a Canadian Historical Case
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 8 [Special Issue – July 2013] Innovation versus Imitation Choices amid Technological Turbulence and Intense Competition: Evidence from a Canadian Historical Case Patrice Gélinas, PhD Associate Professorof Accounting School of Administrative Studies York University Lisa Baillargeon, PhD Associate Professor of Management Accounting Accounting Department - ESG University of Quebec at Montreal Abstract This paper investigates two determinants of managerial choices between product innovation and product imitation in the case of Quebec’s cast iron stove industry at the beginning of the 20th century.Analyses rely on three main sources of data focused on stoves advertised in the province: newspaper and magazine advertisements published by foundries and merchants, catalogues and secondary sources. Results suggest that product imitation strategies outpaced product innovation strategies due to high technological turbulence and high competitive intensity. Implications are that further research frameworks on innovation versus imitation choices should include those two constructs. Key Words: Innovation, imitation, Canada, Quebec, business history, foundries, strategy Introduction This paper investigates two determinants of managerial choices between product innovation and product imitation in the empirical context of the eastern Canadian cast iron stove industry at the beginning of the 20th century. More specifically, we examine how the technological context and the competitive environment may have shaped production decisions of foundries producing and marketing cast iron stoves in the province of Quebec at the time. Stove model imitation at the beginning of the 20th century in Canada is a phenomenon that has been known for a long time (Arthur & Ritchie, 1982; Baillargeon, 2006; Lessard, 1994). -
Top 100 Processors Rank
TOP 100 PROCESSORS OPERATIONS NAME OF COMPANY Location net sales No. of Number of RANK Chief Officer, Title (millions) plants employees Beef Slaughter Boxed Beef Beef Further Processing Ground Beef Pork Slaughter Fresh Pork Fresh Sausage Cured Sausage Ham Deli Meat Bacon Poultry Slaughter Poultry Further Processing Veal Lamb Game Seafood Prepared Foods Portion Control Case-Ready Private Labeling Export Natural/Organic Tyson Foods Inc. Springdale, Ark. 40,600 100 113,000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 Donnie Smith, President/CEO 2015 : 1 JBS USA Holdings Inc. 33,680 Greeley, Colo. 44 73,000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 Andre Nogueira, President/CEO (EFR) 2015 : 2 Cargill Meat Solutions Corp. Wichita, Kan 23,000 30 26,800 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jody Horner, President 2015 : 3 Smithfield Foods Inc. Smithfield, Va. 14,000 54 50,236 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 C. Larry Pope, President/CEO 2015 : 5 Hormel Foods Corp. Austin, Minn. 9,300 43 20,700 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 Jeffrey M. Ettinger, Chairman/CEO 2015 : 6 National Beef Packing Co. LLC Kansas City, Mo. 7,400 5 8,000 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 6 Tim Klein, CEO 2015 : 7 ConAgra Foods Inc. (Consumer Foods) 7,304 Omaha, Neb.