DOCSLIB.ORG

Thermal Physics Interactions and Implications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thermal Physics Interactions and Implications Northeastern Illinois University Thermal Physics Interactions and Implications Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Spring 2020 c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 1 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Overview University Temperature Paramagnetism Thermal Equilibrium & Temperature Pressure The Thermodynamic Identity Diffusive Equilibrium c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 2 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Statistical Mechanics University Fundamental assumption of statistical mechanics: All accessible microstates of a system are equally likely. Thus, the probability of finding the system in a macrostate q: P ∝ Ω(q) Any large state in thermal equilibrium will be found in the macrostate q of greatest multiplicity Ω(q). Given Boltzmann’s definition of entropy: S ≡ k lnΩ (entropy) The entropy of an isolated system always increases: Thermal Equilibrium: The spontaneous flow of energy stops when a system is at or near its most likely macrostate. c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 3 / 47 Northeastern Illinois University Statistical Mechanics Temperature Entropy ES Entropy Plot (NA = 150, NB = 150, q = 12) Multiplicities of Einstein Solids Temperature from Entropy Temperature Entropy and Heat Paramagnetism Thermal Equilibrium & Temperature Pressure The Thermodynamic Identity Diffusive Equilibrium c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 4 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy Plot (NA = 200, NB = 100, q = 12) University S = k lnΩ. In equilib.: ∂S = ∂S = 0. ∂SA = ∂SB = 1 . ∂qA ∂UA ∂UA ∂UB T 60 S 50 k 40 30 B T = A 20 T SA SB Entropy10 in Units of TA <TB TA >TB 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 qA c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 5 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy Plot (NA = 150, NB = 150, q = 12) University S = k lnΩ. In equilib.: ∂S = ∂S = 0. ∂SA = ∂SB = 1 . ∂qA ∂UA ∂UA ∂UB T 60 S 50 k B 40 T = A 30 T 20 SA SB Entropy in Units of 10 TA <TB TA >TB 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9101112 qA c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 6 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Multiplicities of Einstein Solids University qA ΩA SA/k qB ΩB SB/k Ω S/k 0 1 0 100 2.8 × 1081 187.5 2.8 × 1081 187.5 1 300 5.7 99 9.3 × 1080 186.4 2.8 × 1083 192.1 2 45150 10.7 98 3.1 × 1080 185.3 1.4 × 1085 196.0 . 11 5.3 × 1019 45.4 89 1.1 × 1076 175.1 5.9 × 1095 220.5 12 1.4 × 1021 48.7 88 3.4 × 1075 173.9 4.7 × 1096 222.6 13 3.3 × 1022 51.9 87 1.0 × 1075 172.7 3.5 × 1097 224.6 . 59 2.2 × 1068 157.4 41 3.1 × 1046 107.0 6.7 × 10114 264.4 60 1.3 × 1069 159.1 40 5.3 × 1045 105.3 6.9 × 10114 264.4 61 7.7 × 1069 160.9 39 8.8 × 1044 103.5 6.8 × 10114 264.4 . 100 1.7 × 1096 221.6 0 1 0 1.7 × 1096 221.6 Table 1: Macrostates, multiplicities, and entropies of a system of two Einstein solids, one with 300 oscillators and the other with 200, sharing a total of 100 units of energy. c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 7 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Temperature from Entropy University A theoretical definition of temperature: ∂S −1 1 ∂S T ≡ or ≡ ∂U T ∂U N,V Example: Einstein solid at large temperature U = ǫq: ∼ N S/k = lnΩ ∼ (q + N)ln q +(q + N) q − N ln N − q ln q ∼ N ln q/N + N + O(N 2/q) ∼ qe ∼ N ln N ∼ Ue e ∼ N ln Nǫ = N ln U + N ln Nǫ Active Learning: Show that U = NkT c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 8 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy and Heat University At constant V , N: dU d¯Q dT dS = = = C T T V T The increase in entropy: Tf Tf dT Tf ∆S = dS = C ∼ C ln V T V T ZTi ZTi i c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 9 / 47 Northeastern Illinois University Statistical Mechanics Temperature Paramagnetism Paramagnetism Two State Paramagnet Two State Paramagnet (s = 1/2) Entropy: Two Paramagnetism State Paramagnet Temperature of a Paramagnet Plot: S(U) Negative Temperature Plot: S(T ) Plot: U(T ) Plot: CB (T ) Plot: M(T ) Plot: M(T ) II Plot: S(U) Negative Temperature Plot: S(T ) Plot: U(T ) Plot: CB (T ) Curie’s c 2004-2020 Law G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 10 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Paramagnetism University Paramagnet: a material in which constituent particles behave like tiny compass needles which line up parallel to an externally applied magnetic field. c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 11 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Two State Paramagnet University Consider N, identical spin-1/2 dipoles, e.g. electrons: Electron Spin: ↓ ↑ ↑ N↑ = spin up, N↓ = spin down ↑ ↑ ↓ N electrons: ↑ ↓ ↑ N = N↑ + N↓ The total energy of the system is a function of N↑. Multiplicity of states: N N! N! Ω= = = N N !(N − N )! N !N ! ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 12 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Two State Paramagnet (s =1/2) University +µB B ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↑··· U −µB N = N↑ + N↓ Total Energy| {z } U = µB (N↓ − N↑)= µB (N − 2N↑)= −M · B Magnetization, M: U M = µ (N − N )= − ↑ ↓ B Multiplicity N N! N! Ω= = = N N !(N − N )! N !N ! ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 13 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy: Two State Paramagnet University Multiplicity N N! N! Ω(N )= = = ↑ N N !(N − N )! N !N ! ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ Using Stirling’s approximation and S = k lnΩ: S ≈ N ln N − N↑ ln N↑ − (N − N↑)ln(N − N↑) − N + N↑ + N↓ ≈ N ln N − N↑ ln N↑ − (N − N↑)ln(N − N↑) c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 14 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy: Two State Paramagnet University Using Stirling’s approximation and S = k lnΩ: S ≈ N ln N − N↑ ln N↑ − (N − N↑)ln(N − N↑) − N + N↑ + N↓ ≈ N ln N − N↑ ln N↑ − (N − N↑)ln(N − N↑) The energy of a two state paramagnet is: U = µB (N↓ − N↑)= µB (N − 2N↑) From which we can write: 1 U 1 U N = N − , N = N + ↑ 2 µB ↓ 2 µB Entropy in terms of U: 2N U N − (U/µB) S/k ≈ N ln + ln 2 − 2 2µB N +(U/µB) N (U/µB) ! c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 14 / 47 p Northeastern Illinois Entropy: Two State Paramagnet University Entropy in terms of U: 2N U N − (U/µB) S/k ≈ N ln + ln 2 − 2 2µB N +(U/µB) N (U/µB) ! From the definitionp of temperature: ∂S k N − U/µB T −1 = = ln ∂U 2µB N + U/µB V,N c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 14 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy: Two State Paramagnet University From the definition of temperature: ∂S k N − U/µB T −1 = = ln ∂U 2µB N + U/µB V,N Starting with the previous expression 1 1 N − U/µB = ln kT 2µB N + U/µB Multiply by 2µB and exponentiate to find N − U/µB e2µB/kT = N + U/µB Solving for U 1 − e2µB/kT µB U = NµB = −NµB tanh 1+ e2µB/kT kT c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 14 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Temperature of a Paramagnet University Entropy S ≈ N ln N − N↑ ln N↑ − (N − N↑)ln(N − N↑) Temperature 1 ∂S ∂N ∂S 1 ∂S ≈ = ↑ = − T ∂U ∂U ∂N 2µB ∂N N,B ↑ ↑ In terms of U 1 k N − U/µB = ln T 2µB N + U/µB Solving for U µB U = −NµB tanh kT c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 15 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy of a Paramagnet S(U) University T −1 = ∂S/∂U S/k ∂U/∂S = T −N 0 N U/µB 2N U N − (U/µB) S/k ∼ N ln + ln 2 − 2 2µB N +(U/µB) N (U/µB) ! c 2004-2020 G. Anderson p Thermal Physics – slide 16 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Negative Temperature University Negative temperature requires: • Thermal equilibrium • Requires a finite upper bound on energy spectrum. e.g., nuclear paramagnets. • System must be energetically isolated from pos. temp. states. Understanding negative temperature • From Inverted population e.g. N↓ >N↑. • Negative temps. correspond to higher energies. They are “hotter” than positive temperatures. Entropy is more fundamental than temperature. c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 17 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Entropy of a Paramagnet S(T ) University 1 S Nk 0 0 1 2 3 4 x = µB/kT S/(Nk) = ln2(cosh x) − x tanh x c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 18 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Energy of a Paramagnet U(T ) University µB U = −NµB tanh kT 1 0 U NµB -1 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 τ = kT/µB c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 19 / 47 Northeastern Illinois Heat capacity of a spin-1/2 paramagnet University Heat capacity at constant magnetic field: ∂U ∂NµB tanh(µB/kT ) (µB/kT )2 CB = = − = Nk ∂T ∂T cosh2(µB/kT ) B B 0.4 Schottky anomaly 0.3 CB 0.2 0.1 0 01234567 τ = kT/µB c 2004-2020 G. Anderson Thermal Physics – slide 20 / 47 Northeastern µB Illinois Magnetization M = Nµ tanh University kT 1 ) M/Nµ 0 Curie’s Law (T ≫ µB/k) ∼ µB M ∼ Nµ kT Magnetization ( -1 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 x = µB/kT c 2004-2020 G.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Temperature Dependence of Breakdown and Avalanche Multiplication in In0.53Ga0.47As Diodes and Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors
    This is a repository copy of Temperature dependence of breakdown and avalanche multiplication in In0.53Ga0.47As diodes and heterojunction bipolar transistors . White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/896/ Article: Yee, M., Ng, W.K., David, J.P.R. et al. (3 more authors) (2003) Temperature dependence of breakdown and avalanche multiplication in In0.53Ga0.47As diodes and heterojunction bipolar transistors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 50 (10). pp. 2021-2026. ISSN 0018-9383 https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2003.816553 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, VOL. 50, NO. 10, OCTOBER 2003 2021 Temperature Dependence of Breakdown and Avalanche Multiplication in InHXSQGaHXRUAs Diodes and Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors M.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYS 596 Team 1
    Braun, S., Ronzheimer, J., Schreiber, M., Hodgman, S., Rom, T., Bloch, I. and Schneider, U. (2013). Negative Absolute Temperature for Motional Degrees of Freedom. Science, 339(6115), pp.52-55. PHYS 596 Team 1 Shreya, Nina, Nathan, Faisal What is negative absolute temperature? • An ensemble of particles is said to have negative absolute temperature if higher energy states are more likely to be occupied than lower energy states. −퐸푖/푘푇 푃푖 ∝ 푒 • If high energy states are more populated than low energy states, entropy decreases with energy. 1 휕푆 ≡ 푇 휕퐸 Negative absolute temperature Previous work on negative temperature • The first experiment to measure negative temperature was performed at Harvard by Purcell and Pound in 1951. • By quickly reversing the magnetic field acting on a nuclear spin crystal, they produced a sample where the higher energy states were more occupied. • Since then negative temperature ensembles in spin systems have been produced in other ways. Oja and Lounasmaa (1997) gives a comprehensive review. Negative temperature for motional degrees of freedom • For the probability distribution of a negative temperature ensemble to be normalizable, we need an upper bound in energy. • Since localized spin systems have a finite number of energy states there is a natural upper bound in energy. • This is hard to achieve in systems with motional degrees of freedom since kinetic energy is usually not bounded from above. • Braun et al (2013) achieves exactly this with bosonic cold atoms in an optical lattice. What is the point? • At thermal equilibrium, negative temperature implies negative pressure. • This is relevant to models of dark energy and cosmology based on Bose-Einstein condensation.
    [Show full text]
  • Consistent Thermostatistics Forbids Negative Absolute Temperatures
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 8 DECEMBER 2013 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS2815 Consistent thermostatistics forbids negative absolute temperatures Jörn Dunkel1* and Stefan Hilbert2 Over the past 60 years, a considerable number of theories and experiments have claimed the existence of negative absolute temperature in spin systems and ultracold quantum gases. This has led to speculation that ultracold gases may be dark-energy analogues and also suggests the feasibility of heat engines with efficiencies larger than one. Here, we prove that all previous negative temperature claims and their implications are invalid as they arise from the use of an entropy definition that is inconsistent both mathematically and thermodynamically. We show that the underlying conceptual deficiencies can be overcome if one adopts a microcanonical entropy functional originally derived by Gibbs. The resulting thermodynamic framework is self-consistent and implies that absolute temperature remains positive even for systems with a bounded spectrum. In addition, we propose a minimal quantum thermometer that can be implemented with available experimental techniques. ositivity of absolute temperature T, a key postulate of Gibbs formalism yields strictly non-negative absolute temperatures thermodynamics1, has repeatedly been challenged both even for quantum systems with a bounded spectrum, thereby Ptheoretically2–4 and experimentally5–7. If indeed realizable, invalidating all previous negative temperature claims. negative temperature systems promise profound practical and conceptual
    [Show full text]
  • Two Level System & Negative Temperature
    PHYS4006: Thermal and Statistical Physics Lecture Notes Part - 4 (Unit - IV) Two Level System & Negative Temperature Dr. Neelabh Srivastava (Assistant Professor) Department of Physics Programme: M.Sc. Physics Mahatma Gandhi Central University Semester: 2nd Motihari-845401, Bihar E-mail: [email protected] Two level energy system • Consider a system having two non-degenerate microstates with energies ε1 and ε2. The energy difference between the levels is ε= ε - ε 2 1 ε2 Let us assume that the system is in ε= ε - ε thermal equilibrium at temperature T. 2 1 So, the partition function of the system is – ε1 Z exp 1 exp 2 ........(1) kT kT The probability of occupancy of these states is given by - exp 1 exp 1 kT kT 1 P 1 Z exp 1 exp 2 1 exp 2 1 kT kT kT 2 exp 2 exp 2 exp 2 1 kT kT kT P 2 Z exp 1 exp 2 1 exp 2 1 kT kT kT or, 1 and exp P1 ......(2) T P ........(3) 1 exp 2 T 1 exp T where 2 1 k From (2) and (3), we can see that P1 and P2 depends on T. Thus, if T=0, P1=1 and P2=0 (System is in ground state) When T<<θ, i.e. kT<<ε then P2 is negligible and it begins to increase when temperature is increased. 3 • Consider a paramagnetic substance having N magnetic atoms per unit volume placed in an external magnetic field B. Assume that each atoms has spin ½ and an intrinsic magnetic moment μB.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Gases at Negative Kinetic Temperature
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 95, 040403 (2005) 22 JULY 2005 Atomic Gases at Negative Kinetic Temperature A. P. Mosk Department of Science & Technology, and MESA+ Research Institute, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands and Laboratoire Kastler-Brossel, Ecole Normale Supe´rieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris CEDEX 05, France (Received 26 January 2005; published 21 July 2005) We show that thermalization of the motion of atoms at negative temperature is possible in an optical lattice, for conditions that are feasible in current experiments. We present a method for reversibly inverting the temperature of a trapped gas. Moreover, a negative-temperature ensemble can be cooled (reducing jTj) by evaporation of the lowest-energy particles. This enables the attainment of the Bose- Einstein condensation phase transition at negative temperature. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.040403 PACS numbers: 03.75.Hh, 03.75.Lm, 05.70.2a Amplification of a macroscopic degree of freedom, such ized in the vicinity of a band gap in a three-dimensional as a laser or maser field, or the motion of an object, is a (3D) optical lattice. The band gap is an energy range inside phenomenon of enormous technological and scientific im- which no single-particle eigenstates exist. If the atoms are portance. In classical thermodynamics, amplification is not constrained to energies just below the band gap the effec- possible in thermal equilibrium at positive temperature. In tive mass will be negative in all directions and the entropy contrast, due to the fluctuation-dissipation theorems [1,2], of the ensemble will decrease with energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Query on Negative Temperature, Internal Interactions and Decrease
    Query on Negative Temperature, Internal Interactions and Decrease of Entropy Yi-Fang Chang Department of Physics, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: After negative temperature is restated, we find that it will derive necessarily decrease of entropy. Negative temperature is based on the Kelvin scale and the condition dU>0 and dS<0. Conversely, there is also negative temperature for dU<0 and dS>0. But, negative temperature is contradiction with usual meaning of temperature and with some basic concepts of physics and mathematics. It is a question in nonequilibrium thermodynamics. We proposed a possibility of decrease of entropy due to fluctuation magnified and internal interactions in some isolated systems. From this we discuss some possible examples and theories. Keywords: entropy; negative temperature; nonequilibrium. PACS: 05.70.-a, 05.20.-y 1.Restatement of Negative Temperature In thermodynamics negative temperature is a well-known idea proposed and expounded by Ramsey [1] and Landau [2], et al. Ramsey discussed the thermodynamics and statistical mechanics of negative absolute temperatures in a detailed and fundamental manner [1]. He proved that if the entropy of a thermodynamic system is not a monotonically increasing function of its internal energy, it possesses a negative temperature whenever ( S / U ) X is negative. Negative temperatures are hotter than positive temperature. He pointed out: from a thermodynamic point of view the only requirement for the existence of a negative temperature is that the entropy S should not be restricted to a monotonically increasing function of the internal energy U. In the thermodynamic equation relating TdS and dU, a temperature is 1 T ( S / U) X .
    [Show full text]
  • NIKOLAI G. BASOV the High Sensitivity of Quantum Amplifiers, and There Was Investigated the Possibility of the Creation of Various Types of Lasers
    N IKOLAI G . B A S O V Semiconductor lasers Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1964 In modern physics, and perhaps this was true earlier, there are two different trends. One group of physicists has the aim of investigating new regularities and solving existing contradictions. They believe the result of their work to be a theory; in particular, the creation of the mathematical apparatus of modern physics. As a by-product there appear new principles for constructing devices, physical devices. The other group, on the contrary, seeks to create physical devices using new physical principles. They try to avoid the inevitable difficulties and con- tradictions on the way to achieving that purpose. This group considers various hypotheses and theories to be the by-product of their activity. Both groups have made outstanding achievements. Each group creates a nutrient medium for the other and therefore they are unable to exist without one another; although, their attitude towards each other is often rather critical. The first group calls the second « inventors », while the second group accuses the first of abstractness or sometimes of aimlessness. One may think at first sight that we are speaking about experimentors and theoreticians. However, this is not so, because both groups include these two kinds of physicists. At present this division into two groups has become so pronounced that one may easily attribute whole branches of science to the first or to the second group, although there are some fields of physics where both groups work together. Included in the first group are most research workers in such fields as quan- tum electrodynamics, the theory of elementary particles, many branches of nuclear physics, gravitation, cosmology, and solid-state physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Thermodynamics: the Three-Level Laser As an Endoreversible Heat Engine
    Light and thermodynamics: The three-level laser as an endoreversible heat engine Peter Muys Laser Power Optics, Ter Rivierenlaan 1 P.O. box 4, 2100 Antwerpen Belgium [email protected] +32 477 451916 Abstract: In the past, a number of heat engine models have been devised to apply the principles of thermodynamics to a laser. The best one known is the model using a negative temperature to describe population inversion. In this paper, we present a new temperature scale not based on reservoir temperatures. This is realized by revealing a formal mathematical similarity between the expressions for the optimum power generated by an endoreversible heat engine and the optimum output-coupled power from a three-level laser resonator. As a consequence, the theory of endoreversibility can be applied to enable a new efficiency analysis of the cooling of high- power lasers. We extend the endoreversibility concept also to the four-level laser model. 1. Introduction It was found very early in the history of the laser that a three-level optical amplifier could be considered as a heat engine [1] . The justification was based on a quantum model of the lasing element, and hence was named a “quantum heat engine”. The engine is working between two reservoirs, the hot and the cold one, at respective (absolute) temperatures TH and TC. In the ideal case of reversible operation, this engine follows the Carnot law: its efficiency with which heat (pump power) is converted to work (laser power) is limited by TC =1 − (1) TH A number of conceptual difficulties were pointed out later [2] , such as the debatable assignment of negative temperatures to the different atomic transitions, since these are out of equilibrium, and hence not suited to the concept of temperature which presupposes thermal equilibrium.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesoscopy and Thermodynamics
    EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Mesoscopy and thermodynamics L. G. Moretto, J. B. Elliott, and L. Phair Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720 Received: date / Revised version: date Abstract. The interplay of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics is discussed with special attention to mesoscopic systems and phase transitions. PACS. 25.70.Pq – 05.70.Jk – 24.60.Ky – 64.60.Ak 1 Introduction course of theoretical speculation is wisely trimmed by the correctness of thermodynamical empiricism. Thermodynamics is an empirical science devoted to the The “recent” extension of experimental [1–3] and the- description of macroscopic systems. It follows formally oretical research to systems that are neither wholly mi- from its three principles and stands firmly independent croscopic nor macroscopic, thus aptly named mesoscopic, of any microscopic description. Statistical mechanics, on should be enlightened by the same wisdom. While names the other hand, is founded on the general principles of and functions (temperature, entropy, free energy...) were mechanics, and attempts to bridge the gap from the mi- borrowed from thermodynamics, the urge to label the field croscopic description of a system to its macroscopic ther- as “novel” led to rash statements such as the primacy of modynamical properties. This attempt has met with un- one ensemble (microcanonical) over the others, or even deniable success through the introduction of ensembles to the affirmation of a “new” thermodynamics or to the such as microcanonical, canonical, grand canonical, etc., “failure” of the “old” thermodynamics and its principles. whereby microstates, constrained to satisfy some specific These rash statements have often been accompanied macroscopic conditions are used to obtain average values by a cavalier disregard for the physical definitions and of macroscopic variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Physics
    Part II | Statistical Physics Based on lectures by H. S. Reall Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 2017 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after lectures. They are nowhere near accurate representations of what was actually lectured, and in particular, all errors are almost surely mine. Part IB Quantum Mechanics and \Multiparticle Systems" from Part II Principles of Quantum Mechanics are essential Fundamentals of statistical mechanics Microcanonical ensemble. Entropy, temperature and pressure. Laws of thermody- namics. Example of paramagnetism. Boltzmann distribution and canonical ensemble. Partition function. Free energy. Specific heats. Chemical Potential. Grand Canonical Ensemble. [5] Classical gases Density of states and the classical limit. Ideal gas. Maxwell distribution. Equipartition of energy. Diatomic gas. Interacting gases. Virial expansion. Van der Waal's equation of state. Basic kinetic theory. [3] Quantum gases Density of states. Planck distribution and black body radiation. Debye model of phonons in solids. Bose{Einstein distribution. Ideal Bose gas and Bose{Einstein condensation. Fermi-Dirac distribution. Ideal Fermi gas. Pauli paramagnetism. [8] Thermodynamics Thermodynamic temperature scale. Heat and work. Carnot cycle. Applications of laws of thermodynamics. Thermodynamic potentials. Maxwell relations. [4] Phase transitions Liquid-gas transitions. Critical point and critical exponents. Ising model. Mean field theory. First and second order phase transitions. Symmetries and order parameters. [4] 1 Contents II Statistical Physics Contents 0 Introduction 3 1 Fundamentals of statistical mechanics 4 1.1 Microcanonical ensemble . .4 1.2 Pressure, volume and the first law of thermodynamics . 12 1.3 The canonical ensemble . 15 1.4 Helmholtz free energy .
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 MC-CE Negative Temperature II
    Negative temperature II Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: November 29, 2018) Fig. (a) Subsystem 1 has an upper limit to energy it can have, whereas subsystem 2 is a normal thermodynamic system, which has no upper limit to the energy it can have and is always T at a positive absolute temperature ( 2 0 ). In the initial state, with the adiabatic partition T in place, subsystem 1 starts at a negative absolute temperature ( 1 0 ). (b) The adiabatic partition is replaced by a diathermic partition. In the approach to thermal equilibrium, heat is transferred, on average, from subsystem 1, which is initially at a negative absolute temperature, to subsystem 2 which is always at a positive absolute temperature. 1 S 1 S 1 , 2 T U T U 1 1 V N 2 2 V N 1, 1 2, 2 As the closed composite system as shown in the above figure, approaches thermal equilibrium on average, S S dS dS1 dU 2 dU 0 12U 1 U 2 1VN 2 VN 11, 22 , U U Since 1 2 constant, we get dU dU 2 1 Hence we have S S dSdS[1 2 ] dU 1 2 U U 2 1VN 2 VN 11, 22 , 1 1 ( ) dU T T 2 2 1 T T 1 2 dU 0 TT 2 1 2 where 1 S 1 S 1 , 2 T U T U 1 1 V N 2 2 V N 1, 1 2, 2 T T T T dU Suppose that 1 and 2 are positive temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physics of Negative Absolute Temperatures
    The Physics of Negative Absolute Temperatures Eitan Abraham∗ Institute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics, and Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK Oliver Penrosey Department of Mathematics and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Colin Maclaurin Building, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK (Dated: November 25, 2016) Negative absolute temperatures were introduced into experimental physics by Purcell and Pound, who successfully applied this concept to nuclear spins; nevertheless the concept has proved con- troversial : a recent article aroused considerable interest by its claim, based on a classical entropy formula (the `volume entropy') due to Gibbs, that negative temperatures violated basic princi- ples of statistical thermodynamics. Here we give a thermodynamic analysis which confirms the negative-temperature interpretation of the Purcell-Pound experiments. We also examine the princi- pal arguments that have been advanced against the negative temperature concept; we find that these arguments are not logically compelling and moreover that the underlying `volume' entropy formula leads to predictions inconsistent with existing experimental results on nuclear spins. We conclude that, despite the counter-arguments, negative absolute temperatures make good theoretical sense and did occur in the experiments designed to produce them. PACS numbers: 05.70.-a, 05.30.d Keywords: Negative absolute temperatures, nuclear spin systems, entropy definitions I. INTRODUCTION amine, in section IV, the statistical mechanics argument which has been held to rule out negative temperatures; The concept of negative absolute temperature, first we find that this argument is not logically compelling mooted by Onsager[1, 2] in the context of two- and moreover (subsection IV D) that it leads to predic- dimensional turbulence, fits consistently into the descrip- tions inconsistent with known experimental results.
    [Show full text]