DOCSLIB.ORG

ASIAS Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASIAS Overview Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) ASIAS Overview Gerardo Hueto May 2013 Accidents Have Become Less Frequent and Less Severe 32 Accidents 11 Accidents 1,023 Fatalities 518 Fatalities 2011 US Part 121 Fatal Accidents Number of Fatalities Sources: NTSB & FSF 1 50 100 150 200 265 2 But… We Need to do Better! What is ASIAS…. A collaborative Government-Industry initiative on data sharing & analysis to proactively discover safety concerns before accidents or incidents occur, leading to timely mitigation and prevention ASIAS Data Sources • Aviation Safety Action Proprietary Program (ASAP) ATC • Traffic Management • Flight Operations Quality Reroutes and Delays Data Assurance (FOQA) Information • Airport Configuration • Air Traffic Safety Action and Operations Program (ATSAP) • Sector and Route Structure • Manufacturers data • Procedures • Avionics data • Surveillance Data for En Route, Terminal and Airport • NOTAMs Safety Data • Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) • Runway Incursion • Surface Incident • Bureau of Transportation • Operational Errors/ Other Statistics Operational Deviation Information • Weather / Winds • Pilot Deviation Terrain and Obstacle • Vehicle or Pedestrian • Data • FAA Accident/Incident Deviation Data System • National Transportation • FAA Service Difficulty Safety Board Reports • ICAO safety reports 4 ASIAS Members 44 Airlines Air Wisconsin Airlines *Evergreen International Polar Air Cargo Alaska Airlines Airlines PSA Airlines Aloha Air Cargo ExpressJet Republic Airlines American Airlines FedEx Express Shuttle America American Eagle Airlines Frontier Airlines SkyWest Airlines Atlas Air GoJet Airlines Silver Airways Cape Air Hawaiian Airlines Southwest Airlines Chautauqua Airlines JetBlue Airways Spirit Airlines CitationAir Mesa Airlines Sun Country Airlines Colgan Air Mesaba Airlines Trans States Airlines Comair Miami Air International United Airlines CommutAir North American Airlines United Parcel Service Compass Airlines Omni Air International US Airways Delta Air Lines Piedmont Airlines USA 3000 Airlines Empire Airlines Pinnacle Airlines World Airways Government Industry FAA, NASA, Naval Air Force Atlantic, AIA, ALPA, APA, A4A, Boeing, USAF Safety Center NATCA *Newest Member As of 19 April 2012 ASIAS Functional Benefits With ASIAS, the aviation community is able to . • Identify Systemic Risks – Establish safety baselines of current operations – Identify known and newly emerging system vulnerabilities – Monitor safety trends • Evaluate Identified Risks – Estimate their probabilities – Assess their severities – Uncover event precursors – Diagnose event causation • Formulate Interventions – Assess the probable effects of safety enhancements through simulation studies • Monitor Intervention Effects – Assess the effectiveness of interventions (SEs) in accordance with metrics established by the CAST ASIAS Produces New Insights into Known and Emerging Risks Understanding Contributing Factors through Data Fusion ASIAS aggregates data across multiple Traffic Tracks operators and Source: FAA National analyzes it at the Offload Program national level Minimum Vectoring Altitudes Source: Air Traffic Control ASIAS fuses data from various sources Airport & Airspace Safety Event Locations Procedures Source: Digital Flight Data, Source: Air Traffic Control Safety Reports Weather Source: FAA & NOAA ASIAS leverages available tools and builds new Terrain Source: National Elevation Data tools 8 ASIAS Produces New Insights into Known and Emerging Risks Identifying TCAS Resolution Advisory Hotspots and Contributing Factors In-depth analysis of known Departures safety issues to highlight underlying causes and characterize impacts Sensitive long-term monitoring to detect changes in known Helicopter Traffic risks or safety enhancement effectiveness Arrivals Vulnerability discovery to highlight new safety issues for in-depth analysis and mitigation 9 Summary of ASIAS Benefits ASIAS provides for: – A national aggregation and analysis of individual airline safety data – Integration with other available data for improved contextual picture – Achieving a predictive and prognostic ability to identify risks and issues before accidents and incidents occur Benefits all sectors of the aviation community 10 ASIAS Participants and Responsibilities De-identified ASIAS Commercial National-Level ASIAS Approved Findings Executive Study Issue Queries Aviation Approval Airline Safety Metrics Board Analysis De-Identified Participants Data Team (CAST) Definitions Team Responsibilities: Recommendations Identification . Develop policy Firewall Mitigation Mitigation Responsibilities: Issue . Prioritize and approve . Perform De-identified Data studies detailed FAA National- analysis . Review and Level Findings . Track disseminate findings effectiveness Joint . Uncover Implementation vulnerabilities Data Analysis Data Other Team (JIMDAT InteractionInteraction on on Metrics Metrics and andMitigation Mitigation ) Sources Responsibilities: . Assess risk . Conduct root cause analysis . Identify risk mitigations 11 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • Air Line Pilots Page 5 Association, International Our Skies
    March 2015 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE: » Landing Your » Known Crewmember » Sleep Apnea Air Dream Job page 20 page 29 Update page 28 Line PilOt Safeguarding Official Journal of the Air Line Pilots page 5 Association, International Our Skies Follow us on Twitter PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. @wearealpa Sponsored Airline- Career Track ATP offers the airline pilot career training solution with a career track from zero time to 1500 hours sponsored by ATP’s airline alliances. Airline Career month FAST TRACK Demand for airline pilots and ATP graduates is soaring, Pilot Program with the “1500 hour rule” and retirements at the majors. AIRLINES Airlines have selected ATP as a preferred training provider to build their pilot pipelines Private, Instrument, Commercial Multi Also available with... & Certified Flight Instructor (Single, Multi 100 Hours Multi-Engine Experience with the best training in the fastest & Instrument) time frame possible. 225 Hours Flight Time / 100 Multi 230 Hours Flight Time / 40 Multi In the Airline Career Pilot Program, your airline Gain Access to More Corporate, Guaranteed Flight Instructor Job Charter, & Multi-Engine Instructor interview takes place during the commercial phase Job Opportunities of training. Successful applicants will receive a Airline conditional offer of employment at commercial phase of training, based on building Fly Farther & Faster with Multi- conditional offer of employment from one or more of flight experience to 1500 hours in your guaranteed Engine Crew Cross-Country ATP’s airline alliances, plus a guaranteed instructor CFI job. See website for participating airlines, Experience job with ATP or a designated flight school to build admissions, eligibility, and performance requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport Industry Analysis Report
    Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2016 Final Report March 2017 European Commission Annual Analyses related to the EU Air Transport Market 2016 328131 ITD ITA 1 F Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 Final Report March 2015 Annual Analyses of the EU Air Transport Market 2013 MarchFinal Report 201 7 European Commission European Commission Disclaimer and copyright: This report has been carried out for the Directorate General for Mobility and Transport in the European Commission and expresses the opinion of the organisation undertaking the contract MOVE/E1/5-2010/SI2.579402. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Commission's or the Mobility and Transport DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the information given in the report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. Copyright in this report is held by the European Communities. Persons wishing to use the contents of this report (in whole or in part) for purposes other than their personal use are invited to submit a written request to the following address: European Commission - DG MOVE - Library (DM28, 0/36) - B-1049 Brussels e-mail (http://ec.europa.eu/transport/contact/index_en.htm) Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 8774 2000 F +44 (0)20 8681 5706 W www.mottmac.com Issue and revision record StandardSta Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description ndard A 28.03.17 Various K.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractional Charter
    Under a joint venture with the People’s Global charter market experiences rebound Republic of China, NetJets China plans to manage and charter aircraft, such oming off its long slump following the onset of the 2008 reces- as these Challengers, that are wholly sion, air charter has enjoyed a generally good year around the owned by customers, rather than C introducing fractional ownership. globe, and there are indications that the demand will continue to pick up as the world economy finally rights itself, and charter continues to adapt to the needs of travelers around the world. Here’s a look at the SPECIAL REPORT current state of charter markets in North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East. & by James Wynbrandt North America hourly rates for light, midsize and large- FRACTIONAL CHARTER Following two slack years, North cabin aircraft over the past six months American air charter flights increased has shown fluctuations from 10 percent almost 9 percent (8.9%) from August above to 3 percent below the previous 2012 to July 2013 over the same period year’s pricing, and domestic operators Challenger 300 for travelers flying to and Whatever the discrepancies in data, a year before, according to aviation complain that aggressive pricing by com- from designated zones. Sentient, which several major Europe-based providers MARKET research and services firm Argus Inter- petitors keeps rates depressed. claims more than 4,000 active customers, report strong growth over the past year, 21 Global charter market experiences rebound part 1 national. Charter flight activity for all Sales of jet cards, whose flight time is saw strong demand in the charter market due as much to business model adjust- 24 Big four national frax list dwindles to two cabin categories was up for the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Aviation Holdings: the KERP Is Back
    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 860 Broadway, 6th Floor | New York, NY 10003 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected] Global Aviation Holdings: The KERP Is Back Law360, New York (August 06, 2012, 1:11 PM ET) -- In a recent decision[1] involving Global Aviation Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors (collectively, the “debtors”), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York granted the debtors' motion for approval of a key employee retention plan (the “KERP motion”) pursuant to Sections 363(b) and 503(c)(3) of Title 11 of the United States Code over the objections of both the United States Trustee for Region 2 (the “UST”) and the official committee of unsecured creditors (the “committee”). In the objections, the committee and the UST argued the debtors were seeking to pay bonuses to insiders without satisfying the requirements set forth in Section 503(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code. The committee and the UST also argued, that to the extent the key employee retention plan recipients turned out to be non-insiders, the debtors did not establish whether the proposed key employee retention plan payments were “justified by the facts and circumstances of the case” as required by Section 503(c)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code. The debtors operate two airlines: North American Airlines Inc. and World Airways Inc. From the outset of their bankruptcy cases, the debtors planned to move North American’s headquarters from JFK International Airport in Jamaica, N.Y., to World’s headquarters in Peachtree City, Ga., in order to consolidate operations.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Airlines Take Off by Alan Wise, Ketil Gjerstad, Marguerite Fitzgerald, and Jason Guggenheim
    The 2017 Consumer Value Creators Series NorTh AmeriCAN AirliNeS TAke off By Alan Wise, Ketil Gjerstad, Marguerite Fitzgerald, and Jason Guggenheim he airline industry is dominating The Top Ten Tthe travel and tourism sector—out- Of the top ten performers on this year’s pacing hotels, cruise lines, and others in travel and tourism list, nine are in the air- the sector in terms of value creation. North line industry and seven are based in North American carriers in particular have bene- America. (See the exhibit.) That includes fited from restructuring, scale efficiencies, five US carriers: and consolidation over the past decade, giving them a strong position and lower • Hawaiian Holdings, parent company of costs in a robust market. Hawaiian Airlines (which finished first) In 2017, The Boston Consulting Group con- • Delta Air Lines (fourth) ducted its annual study of the total share- holder return (TSR) of more than 2,300 • Southwest Airlines (fifth) publicly traded companies in 33 industry sectors, including 80 companies in travel • Alaska Air Group (sixth) and tourism. (See “How Top Value Creators Outpace the Market—for Decades,” BCG • JetBlue Airways (tenth) article, July 2017.) It’s tempting to cite lower fuel costs as the From 2012 through 2016, the global travel reason for this collective strength, but and tourism sector delivered an average that’s likely a subordinate factor at best. annual return of 19%. It ranked ninth Lower fuel prices affect all carriers world- among the 33 sectors we analyzed and sec- wide, not only those in the US. ond among the five consumer segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Reporting Programs
    Federal Aviation Voluntary Administration Reporting Programs Presented to: KOCA By: Anthony Ferrante Date: April 30, 2014 Strategy for Overseeing a Large Organization • Exploit all resources – The people performing the service have valuable insights • Technology will not take you everywhere you need to go – Some mandatory reports could be automatically captured by software • Encourage a safety culture – Voluntary safety reporting programs are part of a positive, vibrant, safety culture Federal Aviation Administration Philosophy for Voluntary Reporting Programs • Value mistakes • Learn from mistakes • Make safety improvements 誤解の価値を理解する事 • from mistakes 誤解から学ぶ事 Federal Aviation Administration Components of a Voluntary Reporting Program REGULATOR Employee Reports EVENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE Federal Aviation Administration Voluntary Reporting Programs • An oversight authority is a critical component of a voluntary reporting program • These programs use employee input to identify: – significant safety concerns and issues, – operational deficiencies, – non-compliance with regulations, – deviations from policies and procedures, and – unusual safety events Federal Aviation Administration Acceptable Reports • Must be inadvertent • Must not involve gross negligence (that is, the individual did not intentionally introduce risk) • Must not appear to involve criminal activity • Must not appear to involve substance abuse, controlled substances, or alcohol • Must not appear to involve intentional falsification Federal Aviation Administration FAA Voluntary Reporting Programs • Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) • Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP)- Industry employees • Air Traffic Safety Action Program (ATSAP)- Air Traffic Control employees • ATO Safety and Technical Training Program (T-SAP) Technical Operations Services employees Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) ASIAS Overview Federal Aviation Administration What is ASIAS….
    [Show full text]
  • World Air Transport Statistics, Media Kit Edition 2021
    Since 1949 + WATSWorld Air Transport Statistics 2021 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/ or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Associ- ation shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Fur- thermore, the International Air Transport Asso- ciation expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. Opinions expressed in advertisements ap- pearing in this publication are the advertiser’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of IATA. The mention of specific companies or products in advertisement does not im- ply that they are endorsed or recommended by IATA in preference to others of a similar na- ture which are not mentioned or advertised. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Deputy Director General International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland World Air Transport Statistics, Plus Edition 2021 ISBN 978-92-9264-350-8 © 2021 International Air Transport Association.
    [Show full text]
  • CONNECT 2014 DA Solutions and Value
    Flight Operations Today John Kinsman Director, Jeppesen Sales and Service Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Reduce Optimize Increase Leverage Minimize Improve fuel crew airplane real-time disruption operator consumption utilization availability information impact efficiency Delivering Operational Efficiency Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Reduce fuel Consumption ENROUTE DEPARTURE DESCENT PRE-FLIGHT POST- FLIGHT Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Challenge: In 5 years, Fuel costs projected to increase 100% (hedge wind-down) Requested Boeing to identify fuel efficiency opportunities Majority savings in flight planning and flight operations: APU Policy Single engine taxi Airplane weight Arrival Fuels Cost Index Airplane loading CASE STUDY: Flight Planning – Airplanes Mixed (3 types) 100+airplanes Fuel Efficiency Assessment–Flight Planning Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. CASE STUDY: Flight Planning – Airplanes Mixed (3 types) 100+airplanes Fuel Efficiency Assessment–Flight Planning Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Challenge: Internal fuel conservation effort Request to identify additional savings Solution: Found weight savings Modified pilot procedures & flight planning QANTAS CASE STUDY Fuel Efficiency Assessment Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. QANTAS CASE STUDY Fuel Efficiency Assessment Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Current Fuel Dashboard Results Current Customer Results (August 2014) 7.0% Max Identified 4.5% Average Savings 3.5% to 5.5% with Potential 95% confidence (% of Fuel) 2.8% Min Customer Results • 11 airlines • ~600 aircraft • ~485,000 flights Fleet Size • ~$7.7B fuel spend Significant potential identified; Customers typically achieve 1% to 3% Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen. All rights reserved. Savings Identified: CASE STUDY: Fleet size: Extra Large– Region: EMEA Wind Updates Copyright © 2014 Jeppesen.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers
    Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 11,518 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 0 AERO CALIFORNIA 1 AERODYNAMICS, INC. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 0 AEROMEXICO 1 AEROPOSTAL ALAS DE VENEZUEL 3 AEROSVIT UKRANIAN AIRLINES 0 AIR ATLANTA EUROPE 16 AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC 0 AIR CANADA 248 AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 AIR CHINA 1 AIR COMET S.A. 0 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS 0 AIR FRANCE 30 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 1 AIR JAPAN, CO 0 AIR LUXOR 0 AIR NEW ZEALAND 3 AIR PACIFIC, LTD. 0 AIR TAHITI NUI 1 AIR TRANSAT 17 AIR WISCONSIN 132 AIR-INDIA 4 AIRTRAN 87 ALASKA AIRLINES 215 ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIA 10 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO. 0 ALLEGIANT 5 ALOHA AIRLINES 7 AMERICA WEST 536 AMERICAN AIRLINES 2061 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 171 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 3 ATA 94 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES 191 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 27 AVIACSA AIRLINES 3 AVIATION CONCEPTS 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDING LIMITED 5 BOSTON-MAINE AIRWAYS 8 BRITANNIA AIRWAYS LTD. 147 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 165 BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD 16 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS 1 CASINO EXPRESS 1 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD 8 CHAMPION AIR 7 CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC 67 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD 3 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 0 COMAIR 301 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACI 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA (COPA) 3 CONDOR FLUGDIENST 0 CONTINENTAL 398 CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA 3 CZECH AIRLINES 2 DELTA AIR LINES 1326 EGYPTAIR 0 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 66 EMIRATES AIRLINE 4 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 0 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES 11 FALCON AIR EXPRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Hartford Brainard Airport Business Plan
    AIRPORT BUSINESS PLAN Hartford-Brainard Airport Prepared for: Business Plan Executive Summary Prepared by: May 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ES1 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Business Plan Process .................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Airport Profile .............................................................................................................. 3 2.0 EXISTING AIRPORT CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................ 5 2.1 Physical Characteristics ............................................................................................... 5 2.2 Existing Airport Tenants .............................................................................................. 6 2.3 Management Structure ............................................................................................... 9 2.4 Historical Airport Data ............................................................................................... 10 2.5 Baseline Financial Data .............................................................................................. 11 3.0 AIRPORT MARKET AREA .............................................................................................. 13 4.0 SWOT ANALYSIS FOR HARTFORD-BRAINARD AIRPORT
    [Show full text]
  • Air Travel Consumer Report
    U.S. Department of Transportation Air Travel Consumer Report A Product Of The OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS Aviation Consumer Protection Division Issued: February 2006 1 Flight Delays December 2005 12 Months Ending December 2005 1 Mishandled Baggage December 2005 January-December 2005 1 Oversales 4th Quarter 2005 January-December 2005 2 Consumer Complaints December 2005 (Includes Disability and January-December 2005 Discrimination Complaints) Customer Service Reports to the Dept. of Homeland Security3 December 2005 Airline Animal Incident Reports4 December 2005 1 Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Website: http://www.bts.gov/ 2 Data compiled by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division. Website: http://airconsumer.ost.dot.gov/ 3 Data provided by the Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration 4 Data collected by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section Page Introduction ......................…2 Flight Delays Mishandled Baggage Explanation ......................…3 Explanation ....................…..28 Table 1 ......................…4 Ranking--Month ....................…..29 Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Ranking--YTD ..................…....30 Operations Arriving On Time, by Carrier Table 1A ......................…5 Oversales Overall Percentage of Reported Flight Explanation ....................…..31 Operations Arriving On Time and Carrier Rank, Ranking--Quarter ..................…....32 by Month, Quarter, and Data Base to Date Ranking--YTD ..................…....33 Table 2 ......................…6 Number of Reported Flight Arrivals and Percentage Consumer Complaints Arriving On Time, by Carrier and Airport Explanation ....................…..34 Table 3 ....................…10 Percentage of All Carriers' Reported Flight Operations Complaint Tables 1-5 …….......……...35 Arriving On Time, by Airport and Time of Day Summary, Complaint Categories, U.S. Airlines, Incident Date, and Companies Other Than Table 4 ....................…12 U.S.
    [Show full text]