DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessing and Managing Mammal Bites Animal Bites Can Carry a Serious Risk of Broken Bones, Neurovascular Damage, Infection, and Psychological Harm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessing and Managing Mammal Bites Animal Bites Can Carry a Serious Risk of Broken Bones, Neurovascular Damage, Infection, and Psychological Harm URGENT CARE Special Section Assessing and Managing Mammal Bites Animal bites can carry a serious risk of broken bones, neurovascular damage, infection, and psychological harm. Here’s how to size up the situation. Urgent Care Section umans interact with including wound care, infection other mammals ev- prophylaxis, and follow-up. H ery day: pets, farm livestock, service animals, zoo CASE #1: DOG BITE and laboratory animals, and A 5-year-old boy is bitten by a wild animals, both indigenous large neighborhood dog. The and nonindigenous. Add to that child’s parents, who witnessed Lisa D. Mills, MD Associate Professor the growing prevalence of non- the event, report that the dog Section of Emergency Medicine traditional companion animals held the boy’s arm and shook it Director, Emergency Ultrasound (NCAs), such as prairie dogs, violently. The dog is known to John Lilley, MD monkeys, and lemurs, and the have an up-to-date vaccination Resident Physician lifetime risk of being bitten by a profile. The child is tearful and Section of Emergency Medicine mammal rises to 50%. appears to be in pain. On exami- This article explores pertinent nation, you note that the forearm Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center aspects of managing mammal is bruised but the skin is intact, New Orleans, Louisiana bites in the urgent care setting, and there is reduced mobility in left) Inc (lower Researchers, © 2009 Photo right) © 2009 Phototake (upper left, www.emedmag.com JANUARY 2009 | EMERGENCY MEDICINE 35 MAMMAL BITES the shoulder. The rest of the exam is normal. The dogs, followed by cats. Bite wounds from mam- child has no medical problems and his immuni- mals that are not household pets or from NCA zations are up to date. Does this child need any mammals make up a minority of reported bites. further evaluation? What referrals should you However, they will be discussed in this article be- provide? cause, without proper care, these bites can cause significant morbidity and mortality. CASE #2: MONKEY BITE More than two-thirds of bite injuries occur in A 23-year-old woman reports that her pet green children younger than 10 years old—boys more monkey bit her on the chest earlier today. The often than girls. Children most commonly pre- patient recently had a tetanus immunization. On sent with bite wounds to the face, neck, and head. exam, you note a bruised area on the chest with Adults more commonly present with bites to the an associated superficial abrasion. Is any treat- extremities. ment indicated? HISTORY AND PHYSICAL EXAM TIPS CASE #3: CAT BITE Patients usually seek medical care after bites for A 45-year-old man presents with a bite wound on repair of the wound or because the wound has the forearm from his own cat. The cat is appropri- become infected. A thorough history of the event ately vaccinated. The wound is a small puncture includes asking about the timing of the injury, the without active bleeding. The arm is neurovascu- kind of animal involved, its health history (includ- larly intact. The man requests a tetanus shot. Is ing vaccination status and current health), and any further evaluation or treatment indicated? its behavior. Other important information about the animal includes whether it can be observed COMMON BUT OFTEN UNREPORTED or captured. About 1% of emergency department and urgent Thoroughly examine patients with bites. Bear care visits each year are for mammal bite injuries in mind that the most painful or obvious injury or their complications. Ten to 20 people die each may distract the patient from additional injuries, year from mammal bites. In 2006, 310,710 inju- so check areas adjacent to the bite as well. In ries from dog bites alone were reported to the particular, if the patient is a young child or has Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The been mauled by an animal, check the entire body Urgent Care Section actual number of bite wounds from all mammals to identify additional injuries. is estimated to be around 2 million each year, Examine the wound itself meticulously. Many but that figure underestimates the true incidence aspects of mammal bites are not apparent on because most animal bites are unreported. cursory evaluation. Tears, punctures, and crush Animal bite injuries include lacerations, punc- wounds can have extensive subcutaneous in- tures, crush injuries, tears, rips, avulsions, frac- volvement. Flaps and avulsions may hide wound tures, hemorrhage, and contusions. The type contaminants and foreign bodies, such as teeth. and severity of injury depend on the location of Be alert for injuries to the vasculature, nerves, the bite, the species of animal, and size of the tendons, bones, and joints. Examine tendons patient. For instance, animals with large, strong along their full range of motion. A neurovascular jaws, especially large dogs, assessment of pulses, motor function, and sensa- >>FAST TRACK<< inflict crush, avulsion, and tion distal to wounds should precede and follow Many aspects of mammal tearing wounds. Dog bite all exploration and management. Neurovascular bites are not apparent on injuries are divided about structures and tendons can be exposed and in- cursory evaluation. equally among lacerations, jured in avulsions, large lacerations, punctures, puncture wounds, and su- and crush injuries. perficial abrasions. Feline and large rodent bites Bites from large mammals can damage and are more often deep puncture wounds as op- even fracture bone. Large dogs can produce bite posed to lacerations or tears. pressures in excess of 450 psi. The direct force The most common bite injuries are from of a bite can fracture delicate bones of the hand, 36 EMERGENCY MEDICINE | JANUARY 2009 www.emedmag.com MAMMALMAMMAL BITESBITES foot, and face. The crushing aspect of a large animal bite can fracture long bones. A detailed Animal Bites With a High Risk physical examination is needed to discover subtle for Infection fractures. Plain radiographs should be viewed af- ter the exam. Large mammals who bite and shake can dis- • crush injuries locate joints. Have patients perform active range- • hand wounds of-motion with joints that are near bite wounds. • puncture wounds Evaluate the joint for disruption of the capsule (open joint). Joint injection with methylene blue • wounds with extensive devitalized tissue is the most effective nonoperative assessment • heavily contaminated wounds technique for subtle capsule disruption. Maintain • prolonged time from injury to treatment: a low threshold for injecting joints. Missed open 6–12 hours on the body joints can lead to significant morbidity. 12–24 hours on the face Use plain radiography to assess for retained foreign bodies and skeletal injuries. Computed to- mography and magnetic resonance imaging have increased sensitivity for foreign bodies and subtle early suture removal. Inform patients that wound fractures. In cases of high suspicion and nega- infections may occur in spite of the appropriate tive plain films, use these imaging techniques. care. Advise all patients at discharge to look for Urgent Care Section Identifying foreign bodies requires careful exami- signs of infection, such as redness, increasing nation with ample light in a bloodless field. Plain pain, and purulent drainage. films of the affected area complement, but do not Some bite wounds have a higher risk of infection replace, exploration for foreign bodies. (see box). Puncture wounds, for instance, whether closed or left open, become infected more often REDUCING THE RISK OF INFECTION than other wounds. (Wounds that extend more Standard principles of wound care apply to mam- deeply than their length are considered puncture mal bites. (Routine cultures are not indicated and wounds, regardless of the size of the entry wound.) are poor predictors of infection.) Copiously irri- Crush wounds, even when debrided properly, also gate all bites; irrigation reduces the incidence of have an increased risk of infection. viral and bacterial infections. Debride the wound Location plays a significant role in determin- generously: Devitalized tissue does not function ing the management of bite wounds. The over- as a “biological dressing.” It acts as a nidus for all infection rate of head and neck wounds that infection and should not be retained. are primarily closed is low (1.4% to 6%). Despite Bites are tetanus-prone wounds. Patients who the risk of infection, primary closure may be have not had tetanus immunization within the necessary because most wounds to the face are last five years should receive appropriate tetanus in cosmetically sensitive areas. Bite wounds to prophylaxis. For patients without the primary se- the hands have a higher potential for infection ries of tetanus immunizations, refer to the CDC and significant morbidity guidelines. as a result of infection. >>FAST TRACK<< The practice pattern is to close the majority Although hand wounds of wounds primarily. When deciding to close the are still commonly closed, Maintain a low threshold wound, assess its location and size, degree of consider leaving high-risk for injecting joints. Missed contamination, functional impairment, cosmetic wounds open. open joints can lead to outcome, and time from injury. Uncomplicated Older wounds are also significant morbidity. wounds greater than 1.5 cm in cosmetically sensi- at higher risk for infec- tive areas can be primarily closed with minimal tion. As a guideline, a wound 6 to 12 hours from risk of infection. It’s expected that a small percent- the time of injury is considered old on the body. age of wounds will become infected and require Face wounds 12 to 24 hours after the incident are www.emedmag.com JANUARY 2009 | EMERGENCY MEDICINE 37 MAMMAL BITES Infectious Bacteria from Animal Bites considered old. These times are arbitrary, not absolute, and should be considered as only one Animal Bacteria factor in deciding whether to close the wound.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 3 Bites and Stings
    First Aid in Common and Environmental Emergencies UNIT 3 BITES AND STINGS Structure 3.0 Introduction 3.1 Objectives 3.2 Bites and Stings 3.2.1 Definition, Causes, Types and Recognition of Bites and Stings 3.2.2 Assessment of the Victim and General First Aid 3.3 Various Bites/Stings 3.3.1 Scorpion Bite and Spider Bite 3.3.2 Snake Bite 3.3.3 Insect Bite 3.3.4 Animal Bites (Dog Bite/Monkey Bites) 3.3.5 Human Bites 3.4 Let Us Sum Up 3.5 Keywords 3.6 Answers to Check Your Progress 3.7 References and Further Readings 3.0 INTRODUCTION Bites and stings are commonly seen in the rural and remote areas. Nowadays, however, they can occur in urban areas also. Lakhs of people every year are bitten or stung by someone or something. These emergencies include bites and stings due to various reasons. These bites or stings need to be identified and treated early as they affect some part or the whole of the body which can cause mild, moderate or severe reaction and can even be life-threatening. Most are not medical emergencies but however, treatment is usually required if there is bleeding, wounds or infection. All bites and stings are not same. Different First Aid treatment and care is needed depending on the type of insect or animal that has caused the bite. Some species are more dangerous and cause more harm compared to others. Hence, in this unit we shall discuss the different types of bites and stings, causes, recognition and first aid in these situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Table I. Genodermatoses with Known Gene Defects 92 Pulkkinen
    92 Pulkkinen, Ringpfeil, and Uitto JAM ACAD DERMATOL JULY 2002 Table I. Genodermatoses with known gene defects Reference Disease Mutated gene* Affected protein/function No.† Epidermal fragility disorders DEB COL7A1 Type VII collagen 6 Junctional EB LAMA3, LAMB3, ␣3, ␤3, and ␥2 chains of laminin 5, 6 LAMC2, COL17A1 type XVII collagen EB with pyloric atresia ITGA6, ITGB4 ␣6␤4 Integrin 6 EB with muscular dystrophy PLEC1 Plectin 6 EB simplex KRT5, KRT14 Keratins 5 and 14 46 Ectodermal dysplasia with skin fragility PKP1 Plakophilin 1 47 Hailey-Hailey disease ATP2C1 ATP-dependent calcium transporter 13 Keratinization disorders Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis KRT1, KRT10 Keratins 1 and 10 46 Ichthyosis hystrix KRT1 Keratin 1 48 Epidermolytic PPK KRT9 Keratin 9 46 Nonepidermolytic PPK KRT1, KRT16 Keratins 1 and 16 46 Ichthyosis bullosa of Siemens KRT2e Keratin 2e 46 Pachyonychia congenita, types 1 and 2 KRT6a, KRT6b, KRT16, Keratins 6a, 6b, 16, and 17 46 KRT17 White sponge naevus KRT4, KRT13 Keratins 4 and 13 46 X-linked recessive ichthyosis STS Steroid sulfatase 49 Lamellar ichthyosis TGM1 Transglutaminase 1 50 Mutilating keratoderma with ichthyosis LOR Loricrin 10 Vohwinkel’s syndrome GJB2 Connexin 26 12 PPK with deafness GJB2 Connexin 26 12 Erythrokeratodermia variabilis GJB3, GJB4 Connexins 31 and 30.3 12 Darier disease ATP2A2 ATP-dependent calcium 14 transporter Striate PPK DSP, DSG1 Desmoplakin, desmoglein 1 51, 52 Conradi-Hu¨nermann-Happle syndrome EBP Delta 8-delta 7 sterol isomerase 53 (emopamil binding protein) Mal de Meleda ARS SLURP-1
    [Show full text]
  • Monkey Bites - Herpes B Virus Monkeys Carry Many Diseases That Infect Humans
    Monkey Bites - Herpes B Virus Monkeys carry many diseases that infect humans. Exposure to monkey bites and scratches puts one at risk for herpes B virus and rabies. Rabies prophylaxis – Monkey bite victims usually need rabies post-exposure prophylaxis. Please refer to rabies chapter in this manual for more information. Herpes B virus is a dangerous infection that occurs in Macaque monkeys. There are reports of fatal cases in humans of myelitis and hemorrhagic encephalitis caused by herpes B virus transmitted from Macaque monkeys. Persons at greatest risk for B virus infection are travelers, veterinarians, laboratory workers, and others who have close contact with Old World macaques or monkey cell cultures. Infection is typically caused by animal bites or scratches, exposure to the tissues or secretions of macaques, or mucosal contact (contact with the eyes, nose or mouth with infected body fluid or tissue). Human infection can also result from indirect contact via needlestick injury from a contaminated needle. Macaques housed in primate facilities usually become B virus positive by the time they reach adulthood. B virus establishes latent infection in macaques and can only be transmitted during active viral shedding into mucosal surfaces. Although rare viral shedding occurs after reactivation from the latent state, most commonly in animals that have been stressed or immunosuppressed. In nature, Old World macaques are found in Central and Southeast Asia along with Barbary macaques in North Africa and Gibraltar. Identification of the species of primate that bit a person should be made from geographic location and description of the animal, including any pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • 86A1bedb377096cf412d7e5f593
    Contents Gray..................................................................................... Section: Introduction and Diagnosis 1 Introduction to Skin Biology ̈ 1 2 Dermatologic Diagnosis ̈ 16 3 Other Diagnostic Methods ̈ 39 .....................................................................................Blue Section: Dermatologic Diseases 4 Viral Diseases ̈ 53 5 Bacterial Diseases ̈ 73 6 Fungal Diseases ̈ 106 7 Other Infectious Diseases ̈ 122 8 Sexually Transmitted Diseases ̈ 134 9 HIV Infection and AIDS ̈ 155 10 Allergic Diseases ̈ 166 11 Drug Reactions ̈ 179 12 Dermatitis ̈ 190 13 Collagen–Vascular Disorders ̈ 203 14 Autoimmune Bullous Diseases ̈ 229 15 Purpura and Vasculitis ̈ 245 16 Papulosquamous Disorders ̈ 262 17 Granulomatous and Necrobiotic Disorders ̈ 290 18 Dermatoses Caused by Physical and Chemical Agents ̈ 295 19 Metabolic Diseases ̈ 310 20 Pruritus and Prurigo ̈ 328 21 Genodermatoses ̈ 332 22 Disorders of Pigmentation ̈ 371 23 Melanocytic Tumors ̈ 384 24 Cysts and Epidermal Tumors ̈ 407 25 Adnexal Tumors ̈ 424 26 Soft Tissue Tumors ̈ 438 27 Other Cutaneous Tumors ̈ 465 28 Cutaneous Lymphomas and Leukemia ̈ 471 29 Paraneoplastic Disorders ̈ 485 30 Diseases of the Lips and Oral Mucosa ̈ 489 31 Diseases of the Hairs and Scalp ̈ 495 32 Diseases of the Nails ̈ 518 33 Disorders of Sweat Glands ̈ 528 34 Diseases of Sebaceous Glands ̈ 530 35 Diseases of Subcutaneous Fat ̈ 538 36 Anogenital Diseases ̈ 543 37 Phlebology ̈ 552 38 Occupational Dermatoses ̈ 565 39 Skin Diseases in Different Age Groups ̈ 569 40 Psychodermatology
    [Show full text]
  • September 1995
    Nonprofit Organization U.S. Postage ELLOWSTONE Paid Y ANIMAL PEOPLE, The steam isn't all from geysers Inc. YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK––Filmed in Grand Teton National Park, just south of Yellowstone, the 1952 POB 205, SHUSHAN, NY 12873 western classic S h a n e depicted stubborn men who thought them- [ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED.] selves reasonable in a tragic clash over limited range. Alan Ladd, in the title role, won the big showdown, then rode away pledging there would be no more guns in the valley. But more than a century after the S h a n e era, the Yellowstone range wars not only smoulder on, but have heated up. To the north, in rural Montana, at least three times this year armed wise-users have holed up for months, standing off bored cordons of sheriff’s deputies, who wait beyond bullet range to arrest them for not paying taxes and taking the law into their own hands. One of the besieged, Gordon Sellner, 57, was wounded in an alleged shootout and arrested on July 19 near Condon. Sellner, In February, U.S. Fish and Wildlife agents reportedly who said he hadn’t filed a tax return in 20 years, was wanted for backed away from searching an Idaho ranch for evidence in a poach- attempted murder, having allegedly shot a sheriff’s deputy in 1992. ing case, after the proprietor threatened to call a militia. A similar siege goes on at Roundup, where Rodney Skurdahl and But the Yellowstone region battles are waged with political four others are wanted for allegedly issuing a “citizen’s declaration clout more often than guns, and the showdowns usually come in leg- of war” against the state and federal governments and posting boun- islative offices.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Bite & Scratch Care Instructions for Employee's Handling
    Development of Bite, Scratch & Splash Care Instructions for Employees Handling Macaques The adequacy and timeliness of wound decontamination procedures are the most important factors determining the risk of infection after exposure to B virus (Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1, CHV-1). Thorough cleaning within five minutes of injury or exposure is the only means of preventing B virus contamination of a wound from progressing to actual infection. Establishment of clear and concise standard operating procedure (SOP) for the handling of bites, scratches and splashes of body fluids from macaque monkeys (i.e. rhesus, cynomolgus, pigail/pig-tailed) or other injuries from equipment contaminated with body fluids, is critical for the protection of investigative and facility personnel working with these animals. It is the responsibility of the Animal Program Director for each program to ensure that a macaque bite and scratch program is in place for each animal facility or animal program area (e.g. surgery, pathology, necropsy, etc.) using macaques or unfixed tissues (10% neutral phosphate-buffered formalin is generally recommended as the best fixative for routine use) from macaques. In collaboration with their Occupational Safety and Health Specialist, all animal programs utilizing macaques or their unfixed tissues at the NIH must develop a written SOP for the handling of macaque and/or unfixed tissue related injuries at all Government owned or leased facilities. The SOP must delineate the individuals responsible for maintaining the requirements of the SOP, as well as the individual(s) responsible for training personnel and maintaining training records. It is the intent of this document to establish the minimum requirements that must be addressed in all SOPs designed to prevent or treat macaque related injuries and B virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Animal Bite Management & Frequently Asked Questions
    NATIONAL RABIES CONTROL PROGRAMME GUIDELINE FOR ANIMAL BITE MANAGEMENT & FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS PH & CD BRANCH DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH SERVICES GOVT. OF WEST BENGAL October, 2019 ANIMAL BITE MANAGEMENT AND POST EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS OF RABIES Decision to treat: Rabies is endemic in India; so management of animal bites is essential Suspect all animal bites, even scratches Treat as per merit of the bite Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) should be started as soon as possible after the bite. Start treatment and observe the animal for 10 days (applicable only for dog and cat) If the animal (dog and cat) remains healthy throughout the observation then modify the Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) to Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP). Guide forPost-Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) Category Type of contact Recommended Post Exposure Prophylaxis I Touching or feeding animals None, if reliable case history is available. Licks on intact skin II Nibbling of uncovered skin 1. Wound management 2. Administer anti-rabies vaccine immediately Minor scratches or abrasions 3. Convert Post Exposure Prophylaxis to Pre without bleeding Exposure Prophylaxis if dog/cat remains healthy throughout the observation period of 10 days or if it is killed humanely and found to be negative for Rabies by appropriate laboratory techniques. III Single or multiple transdermal 1. Wound Management bites or scratches. 2. Administer rabies immunoglobulin Contamination of mucous 3. Administer anti-rabies vaccine immediately membrane with saliva(i.e. licks) Stop treatment if dog/cat remains healthy throughout an observation period of 10 days or if Licks on broken skin it is killed humanely and found to be negative for rabies by appropriate laboratory techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Bites: Management and Prevention
    FACT SHEET Mammal Bites: Management and Prevention This WorkCare Fact Sheet describes work-related mammal bite risks, symptoms, treatment and prevention. People in many types of occupations are at risk of exposure to bacterial infections and zoonotic diseases spread by mammal bites. Sources of work-related mammal bites include people, dogs, cats, bats, rodents, monkeys and livestock. Mammal bites can cause bacterial infections and serious illness if they are not appropriately treated. Exposure Risks Bites most commonly occur on the hands, face or extremities. When a mammal bite penetrates the skin, a person can become infected by bacteria and exposed to viruses such as rabies, hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Veterinarians, animal handlers, laboratory technicians, workers in outdoor and delivery occupations, and U.S. travelers visiting other countries are among those at risk of occupational exposure. Signs and Symptoms Common signs of infection from animal bites include redness, pain, swelling and inflammation. Less common, and potentially serious, symptoms include: • Pus or fluid oozing from the wound • Swollen lymph nodes • Tenderness in areas near the bite • Fever, chills or night sweats • Loss of sensation around the bite • Fatigue • Limited use of the affected area • Breathing difficulties • Red streaks near the bite • Muscle weakness or tremors Human Bites First responders, law enforcement personnel, teachers, childcare and medical providers are among people with elevated human bite exposure risk. The human mouth contains many types of bacteria, and about 20 percent of human bites cause an infection. Signs of infection from a human bite include swelling, bleeding, intense pain and red marks.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicon 60 (2012) 95–248
    Toxicon 60 (2012) 95–248 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Toxicon journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/toxicon 17th World Congress of the International Society on Toxinology & Venom Week 2012 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 8–13, 2012 Abstract Editors: Steven A. Seifert, MD and Carl-Wilhelm Vogel, MD, PhD 0041-0101/$ – see front matter 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.04.354 96 Abstracts Toxins 2012 / Toxicon 60 (2012) 95–248 Abstracts Toxins 2012 Contents A. Biotoxins as Bioweapons. ...............................................................................97 B. Drug Discovery & Development..........................................................................100 C. Evolution of Toxins & Venom Glands . .....................................................................119 D. Hemostasis. ......................................................................................128 E. History of Toxinology . ..............................................................................137 F. Insects . ...........................................................................................141 G. Marine . ...........................................................................................144 H. Microbial Toxins. ..................................................................................157 I. Miscellaneous . ......................................................................................164 J. Pharmacology . ......................................................................................165 K. Physiology
    [Show full text]
  • A Geosentinel Analysis
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author J Travel Manuscript Author Med. Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2021 November 09. Published in final edited form as: J Travel Med. 2020 November 09; 27(7): . doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa010. Traveller exposures to animals: a GeoSentinel analysis Michael P. Muehlenbein1,*, Kristina M. Angelo2, Patricia Schlagenhauf3, Lin Chen4, Martin P. Grobusch5, Philippe Gautret6, Alexandre Duvignaud7, François Chappuis8, Kevin C. Kain9, Emmanuel Bottieau10, Loïc Epelboin11, Marc Shaw12, Noreen Hynes13, Davidson H. Hamer14, GeoSentinel Surveillance Network† 1Department of Anthropology, Baylor University, 1214 S 4th St, Waco, TX 76706, USA, 2Division of Global Migration and Quarantine, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30333, USA, 3WHO Collaborating Centre for Travellers’ Health University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Department of Public and Global Health Hirschengraben 84, 8001 Zürich, Switzerland, 4Department of Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, 330 Mount Auburn Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138, USA, 5Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal MEdicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, Netherlands 1100DD, 6Méditerranée Infection Foundation, 19-21 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France, 7Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Division
    [Show full text]
  • Eyelid Avulsion from Monkey Bite Stephanie Ming Young* Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore
    perim Ex en l & ta a l ic O p in l h t C h f Journal of Clinical & Experimental a Young, J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol 2012, S:2 o l m l a o n l DOI: 10.4172/2155-9570.S2-003 r o g u y o J Ophthalmology ISSN: 2155-9570 ResearchCase Report Article OpenOpen Access Access Eyelid Avulsion from Monkey Bite Stephanie Ming Young* Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore Abstract A 19-day-old infant was bitten by a macaque monkey in western Singapore, resulting in a full thickness laceration of his upper eyelid, which was successfully repaired with good structural, functional and aesthetic outcome. Periorbital injuries of children are of concern in view of the risk of visual impairment. In addition, monkey bite inoculations carry the risk of transmitting multiple bacterial, Rabies and Herpes B viral infections. The acute management and surgical repair, as well as learning points on management of Simian injuries are discussed. Keywords: Monkeys bites; Eyelid laceration; Eyelid avulsion; with a tonopen was 14 (5%) on the affected eye. He also had a 4 cm long Bacterial infection; Prophylaxis against animal bites laceration over the left parietal area and a jagged-edge 1.5cm laceration at the zygomatic-temporal region. The right eye and the adnexa were Introduction within normal limits. Monkey bites are relatively uncommon, with no previous case reports documenting such lesions of the face or eyelid. Much of how we manage such injuries are learned from reports of other mammalian bites including human, dog and cat bites ,which have been much more well documented [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Burden of Bites and Stings Management: Experience of an Academic Hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ⇑ Anas Khan A, Waad H
    Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 28 (2020) 1049–1054 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal journal homepage: www.sciencedirect.com Original article The burden of bites and stings management: Experience of an academic hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ⇑ Anas Khan a, Waad H. Al-Kathiri c, Bander Balkhi d,e, , Osama Samrkandi f, Mohammed S. Al-Khalifa g, Yousef Asiri d a Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia c Department of Clinical Pharmacy Services, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia d Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia e Pharmacoeconomic Research Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia f Department, Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for EMS, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia g Zoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia article info abstract Article history: Purpose: The main aim of this study is to estimate the economic burden and prevalence of bites and Received 19 April 2020 stings injuries in Saudi Arabia. Accepted 3 July 2020 Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at King Saud University Medical City Available online 9 July 2020 (KSUMC) for all bites and stings cases presented to the Emergency Department (ED) between the period June 2015 and May 2019. Keywords: Results: A total of 1328 bites and stings cases were treated in the ED at KSUMC. There were 886 insect Bites and stings bites and stings cases, 376 animal bites, 22 human bites, 34 scorpion stings, and ten snakebites.
    [Show full text]