History of Psychology: Lecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

History of Psychology: Lecture 1 Intro to psych Psychology Insert definition here: Generally agreed upon to be the study of mind and behavior. Ancient Greek is a language from which many of our words – especially scientific words come Psyche = mind logos = study Let’s find out what it is by what it is not! Michelangelo Dare for an A – name one thing that is not connected to psychology? OK so it is the study of the mind…What is the mind? Mind vs. Brain What comes first? Neural activity or thoughts? Why should it be studied? Who should study it? 2 Intro to psych Psychology is increasingly reliant on the study of the brain. But that leads us back to some interesting questions – does our brain make us do things? - fMRI professional vs. novice pianists - Elliot a middle-aged husband who had a brain tumor. - After it was removed, Elliot started to be unable to make good decisions: • got divorced, remarried, lost his money, got divorced again • Was any of that his fault? Turns out what was removed was the part that allowed him to feel emotions. Thus, psychology includes the study of brains and emotions Psychology has generally been a study of what goes wrong with the mind, brain, behavior and emotions. – see how broad it is. 3 Intro to psych History • Psychology began as philosophy • Plato believed in nativism – some knowledge is innate Example: the ability to learn language • Aristotle believed in tabula rasa = blank slate – humans are born knowing nothing and that they learn everything -This gives rise to the nature vs. nurture debate • A “sense of humor” from the 4 humors = 4 liquids Hippocrates - If you take blood from a vein and let it sit in a glass, it separates into a blackish clot at the bottom, than a layer of yellow fluid, and finally a thin layer of white on top. This fact was the basis of the early belief that personality comes from what is in your blood: • If you have too much “black bile” (darkish material at the bottom) flowing through your “tubes” inside, it makes you depressed and sad. This term was called melancholy. • If you have too much “yellow bile”, you are bitter, angry, and hot-tempered. • If you have too much “Phlegm” flowing, you are dull and sluggish. • Blood: • The Greeks thought personality could be changed by “bloodletting” using leeches or a knife to pierce the skin in order to allow evil spirits to escape. 4 Intro to psych • “Bloodletting” was popular as a treatment for many years to follow. Ex. George Washington in the late 1700’s suffered from bouts of depression unless he stayed active, so he often had blood removed, and he claimed it made him feel better (Flexner, 1974) The French Connection Rene Descartes (1600’s) argued that the mind and the brain are two different things = DUALISM Cool theory but how do the mind and brain interact? Cogito ergo sum = Paul Broca (mid 1800’s)identified Broca’s area based on his patient “Tan” Monsieur Leborgne we’ll study him in the brain chapter English Ideas Thomas Hobbes = political philosopher thought the mind is what the brain does Monism you’ve studied him in politics = opposite of John Locke Franz Joseph Gall also thought the mind and brain were linked, but by size Phrenology – study of the brain by feeling bumps of the skull and scalp The German explosion of psychology Hermann von Helmholtz measured people’s reaction time, precise calculations, and the scientific method and study the difference between a pin prick at the foot and at the thigh Wilhem Wundt notice how big the font is – important name!! *1879 Liepzig Germany = first psychology lab *Wundt wrote a book in 1867 called ‘Principles of Physiological Psychology’ in an attempt to make psychology a ‘hard science’ like biology, chem., physics *Wundt thought psychology should focus on consciousness. **Chemistry was studied by breaking things into elements *Wundt wanted to do the same thing with the mind Structuralism – what things are the mind made of? An anger part? A memory part? A sleep part? 5 Intro to psych Possible homework: draw, sculpt or make a model of your mind Introspection – looking inside your mind to examine your consciousness *Wundt trained his grad students in specific ways to think *He tried to objectively and scientifically measure thoughts American Developments Edward Titchener studied under Wundt set up a lab at Cornell 1890’s In his book he outline 44,000 elemental qualities of consciousness William James notice how big the font is – important name!! Gave rise to I/O *came up with a new approach in 1890’s Functionalism psych and edu (Ferrari) psych *wrote the first psychology book ‘the principles of psychology – what can the mind do? What should the mind do? How fast, how much? – American education *asked how can psychology be used? What is it good for? *disagreed with breaking down consciousness into elements *thought consciousness was a stream that was constantly flowing *was influenced by Charles Darwin’s natural selection theory *mental abilities must have evolved and serve a function *Wundt disagreed with James’s lack of scientific inquiry in a lab and thought James’s thoughts were merely theory *Still James’s ideas became very popular *G. Stanley Hall set up the first American Psychology lab at Johns Hopkins 1881 *believed children develop similarly to our species * We’ll study G. Stanley Hall in the development Chapters Margaret Floy Washburn • 1st women to get a PhD in psychology. • Experimented with animal sensations and what animals can know. 6 Intro to psych Mary Calkins • 1st woman president of A.P.A • Studied paired associations of words and color to scientifically explore memory Gestalt (geshtalt)Psychology – “the whole is more than the sum of its parts” (Frankenstein) Max Wertheimer realized that we do not perceive the world in pieces or think in parts. We think and perceive in groups of things. Herman Ebbinghaus – phi phenomenon Illusion is an error that is made by the brain by following rules that usually work. 7 MODERN PARADIGMS a paradigm is 20 cents Psychology is a broad science and there are a lot of ways of looking and the mind and behavior Etiology – study of causes – each paradigm is a search for a cause – what makes people do things Development of Different schools of psychology *Everything we talked about studied psychology academically *No one used it to help people who were suffering *Mid 1800’s there was the idea of hysteria *Hysteria = loss of physiological functions based on upsetting experiences - not running and screaming *People became blind, couldn’t speak, etc. *it was like a part of the mind was disagreeing with another part 7 Intro to psych Evolutionary – CHARLES DARWIN Premise: A. all behavior is a result of instincts that helped our species survive fixed action pattern B. mental life and personality are programmed by genes Some people are geniuses Some people see the world differently • males act a certain way because that is what nature has programmed them to be • females act a certain way because that is what nature has programmed them to be • Illness: 1.people acting differently then what nature intends 2.People have bad genes • Treatment: there is no treatment, an abnormal person is a mutation who may or may not pass on his genes. • Advantage: can’t be disproven, flexible theory that makes a lot of sense. • Disadvantage: not provable • Psychologists look at 1. Anthropology 2. Anatomical and biological mechanisms that make it possible 3. Environmental conditions which encourage or discourage it • key words : Heritability – the degree to which behavior is because of genetics Genotype – all of the genetic instructions Phenotype – visible genetic instructions Maturationism – children grow according to genetic instructions and environment plays a secondary role 8 Intro to psych 2. Psychodynamic – premise: all behavior and thoughts are a result of unconscious struggles Sigmund Freud notice how big the font is!!! Important!! 1890’s-1930’s - was trained as a medical doctor not a psychologist - didn’t do any research – everything was theory driven - had several students that split off from him - was addicted to cocaine – may or may not have been obsessed with sex - but we’d have to define sex - developed psychoanalysis – way of treating the unconscious • Illness: fundamental animal needs, sex, food, tenderness aggression are in conflict with imposed societal restrictions * very dark idea human nature • different parts of the mind • treatment is to resolve conflicts in a healthy way • advantages: fun, cool theory that can’t be proven wrong • Disadvantages: totally hypothesized and can’t be proven right 9 Intro to psych 3. Behavioral – premise: ALL behavior is learned …the mind is impossible to study it is not empirical so… we should focus on behaviors. We can see behaviors! *Do animals have a mind? *Margaret Floy Washburn thought so. “The Animal Mind” *first women to get a PhD in psychology – Cornell University from Titchener *John Watson & Rosalie Rayner strongly disagreed and worked with the idea of behaviorism • Watson was heavily influence by Ivan Pavlov *Pavlov was a Russian doctor studying digestion in dogs *Found that dogs associated a bell with the smell of food and would drool at the sound of a bell = response **John Watson applied Pavlov’s techniques to human infants **Controversial experiment on Little Albert *Taught the boy who used to like rats to be afraid of them **Believed that the environment was critically important **Had an affair with his assistant - At the time is was Scandalous! – was fired from Johns Hopkins **Ended up working for an advertising firm in NY and applied psychological principles to business.
Recommended publications
  • 'Introspectionism' and the Mythical Origins of Scientific Psychology
    Consciousness and Cognition Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 634–654 www.elsevier.com/locate/concog ‘Introspectionism’ and the mythical origins of scientific psychology Alan Costall Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO1 2DY, UK Received 1 May 2006 Abstract According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of ‘‘behaviour,’’ that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Introspection; Introspectionism; Behaviourism; Dualism; Watson; Wundt 1. Introduction Probably the most immediate result of the acceptance of the behaviorist’s view will be the elimination of self-observation and of the introspective reports resulting from such a method. (Watson, 1913b, p. 428). The problem of consciousness occupies an analogous position for cognitive psychology as the prob- lem of language behavior does for behaviorism, namely, an unsolved anomaly within the domain of an approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing Women in the History of Psychology the First American Women Psychologists
    Placing Women in the History of Psychology The First American Women Psychologists Laurel Furumoto Wellesley College Elizabeth Scarborough State University of New York College at Fredonia ABSTRACT." This article presents an account of the first Traditional history has been written and interpreted by men in American women psychologists. The article provides data an androcentric frame of reference; it might quite properly be on the origins, education, marital status, and careers of described as the history of men. The very term "Women's His- the 22 women who identified themselves as psychologists tory" calls attention to the fact that something is missing from in the first edition of American Men of Science. Further, historical scholarship. (p. xiv) it explores how gender shaped their experience in relation Beyond calling attention to what is missing from the to educational and employment opportunities, responsi- history of psychology, this article begins to fill the gap by bilities to family, and the marriage versus career dilemma. sketching an overview of the lives and experiences of those Illustrations are drawn from the lives of Mary Whiton women who participated in the development of the dis- Calkins, Christine Ladd-Franklin, Margaret Floy Wash- cipline in the United States around the turn of the century. burn, and Ethel Puffer Howes. Sources used include ar- First, we identify early women psychologists. Second, we chival materials (manuscripts, correspondence, and insti- describe the women and note some comparisons between tutional records) as well as published literature. The article them and men psychologists. And last, we discuss wom- calls attention to the necessity of integrating women into en's experiences, focusing on how gender influenced their the history of the discipline if it is to provide an adequate careers.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERT REPORT of PHILIP G. ZIMBARDO, Ph.D
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ) ABDULLAH AL SHIMARI et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 08-cv-0827 GBL-JFA ) CACI INTERNATIONAL, INC., et. al., ) ) Defendants ) ) EXPERT REPORT OF PHILIP G. ZIMBARDO, Ph.D. jO qspgfttjpobm cbdlhspvoe boe rvbmjgjdbujpot j M M j M M O j q t v M j RZWYM q b v O j q OeO q M RZVZM z v M nOtOM RZVVM z v bOcO I J i q M t b M RZVUM c d O j x v M w M s v o k m v M t O j x q g q b q b j q q b O j d i e t M o q t d d b s f t n t O j z v IRZVXNRZWQJM o z v IRZWQN RZWXJM d v IRZWXNRZWYJ t v IRZWYNSQQTJO j v m M c M j m M t v x M q O j UQQ VQ O j N M q m RZ M N q [ d d M X O u [ C u O d s O It oO RVM p SVM RZXRJO i t oO TM d k M i s M o Nt d M g t d M q jjM qM q s q ô s [ d O x M ed[ vOtO h q p O { M qO hO IRZXRJO C t
    [Show full text]
  • North American Journal of Psychology, 1999. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 346P.; Published Semi-Annually
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 449 388 CG 029 765 AUTHOR McCutcheon, Lynn E., Ed. TITLE North American Journal of Psychology, 1999. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 346p.; Published semi-annually. AVAILABLE FROM NAJP, 240 Harbor Dr., Winter Garden, FL 34787 ($35 per annual subscription). Tel: 407-877-8364. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT North American Journal of Psychology; vl n1-2 1999 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC14 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Psychology; *Research Tools; *Scholarly Journals; *Social Science Research ABSTRACT "North American Journal of Psychology" publishes scientific papers of general interest to psychologists and other social scientists. Articles included in volume 1 issue 1 (June 1999) are: "Generalist Looks at His Career in Teaching: Interview with Dr. Phil Zimbardo"; "Affective Information in Videos"; "Infant Communication"; "Defining Projective Techniques"; "Date Selection Choices in College Students"; "Study of the Personality of Violent Children"; "Behavioral and Institutional Theories of Human Resource Practices"; "Self-Estimates of Intelligence:"; "When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going"; "Behaviorism and Cognitivism in Learning Theory"; "On the Distinction between Behavioral Contagion, Conversion Conformity, and Compliance Conformity"; "Promoting Altruism in Troubled Youth"; The Influence of insecurity on Exchange and Communal Intimates"; "Height as Power in Women"; "Moderator Effects of Managerial Activity Inhibition on the Relation between Power versus Affiliation Motive Dominance and Econdmic Efficiency";
    [Show full text]
  • Pathology of Imprisonment
    Pathology of Imprisonment PHILIP G. ZIMBARDO Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues were interested in studying the effects of imprisonment on human behavior—in particular, the psychological impact of imprisonment. They opened a mock prison and peopled it with carefully screened college students who were “mature, emotionally stable, normal, intelligent,” and “from middle-class homes throughout the United States and Canada.” Then they observed what happened. The results of the experiment proved so shocking that the researchers aborted it after just six days. In this essay, Zimbardo reports on these results. He then comments on why prisons breed pathological behavior and what we might do to prevent what happened during the experiment. was recently released from solitary confinement after being held therein Ifor 37 months [months!]. A silent system was imposed upon me and to even whisper to the man in the next cell resulted in being beaten by guards, sprayed with chemical mace, blackjacked, stomped and thrown into a strip- cell naked to sleep on a concrete floor without bedding, covering, wash basin or even a toilet. The floor served as toilet and bed, and even there the silent system was enforced. To let a moan escape your lips because of the pain and discomfort . resulted in another beating. I spent not days, but months there during my 37 months in solitary. I have filed every writ possible against the administrative acts of brutality. The state courts have all denied the petitions. Because of my refusal to let the things die down and forget all that happened during my 37 months in solitary .
    [Show full text]
  • ICS18 - Study Questions
    ICS18 - study questions January 23, 2019 1. What is the broad and what is the narrow notion of cognition? 2. What is representation? Enumenrate examples of representations considerd within different disciplines (cog. psy- chology, neuroscience, AI) and show that they fulfill the definitional requirements 3. Enumerate and characterize briefly key cognitive disciplines 4. Key theses and principles of associationism 5. How to explain a mind: pure vs mixed associationism 6. A mind according to behaviorists 7. Why is behaviorism considered “the scientific psychology”? 8. Why behaviorism (as a theory of mind) was rejected? 9. Find the elements of behaviorism within contemporary cognitive theory of mind (either symbolic or connectionist) 10. Describe Turing Machine as a computational device 11. What is computation? (remember the roll of toilet paper...) 12. The idea of a mind as a “logic machine” (McCulloch, Pitts) 13. What features does a McCulloch-Pitts neuron have? 14. What is the main difference between a McC-P neuron and a perceptron? 15. What is a model? (cf. Kenneth Craik&Minsky) 16. What are the assumptions of phrenology? 17. Localizationist view on a brain (Gall, Spurzheim) 18. Holistic approaches to human brain 19. What does it mean that some part of our body has a “topographic representation” in the brain? 20. The consequences of Broca’s and Wernicke’s discoveries for a cognitive view on a brain 21. What is Brodmann famous for? 22. What did Golgi invent? What consequences had his discovery? 23. Describe Cajal’s discoveries and their influence on neuroscience 24. The key aassumptions of the “neuron doctrine” (Cajal) 25.
    [Show full text]
  • August 12, 2013 President Barack Obama the White House 1600
    August 12, 2013 President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President: We are health care professionals, members of human rights organizations, and others deeply concerned about the delays in closing the Guantánamo Bay detention camp and the appalling treatment of the detainees on hunger strike. The hunger strike has now passed its sixth month and up to 106 detainees have joined, with as many as 46 of them subjected to force-feeding. The President of the American Medical Association (AMA) has written to Defense Secretary Hagel that force-feeding mentally competent adults is a violation of medical ethics. The American Nursing Association (ANA) position statement, consistent with the Code of Ethics for Nurses, asserts that “acceptance or refusal of food and fluids, whether delivered by normal or artificial means must be respected.” The Guantánamo Command maintains that force-feeding the prisoners is necessary to save lives and that the procedures conform to acceptable practice. We strongly disagree. There is alarming evidence in news reports and in the new Guantánamo Standard Operating Procedures: Medical Management of Detainees on Hunger Strike (SOP) that the Guantánamo method is exceptionally brutal. When a detainee resists, he is forcefully extracted from his cell by several soldiers and strapped into a 6-point restraint chair. A mask is placed over his mouth to keep him from biting or spitting at medical personnel. He may stay strapped down for two hours while personnel make sure he does not vomit the liquid feeding. Men weakened by significant weight loss are particularly at risk for serious injury during this regimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Varieties of Fame in Psychology Research-Article6624572016
    PPSXXX10.1177/1745691616662457RoedigerVarieties of Fame in Psychology 662457research-article2016 Perspectives on Psychological Science 2016, Vol. 11(6) 882 –887 Varieties of Fame in Psychology © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1745691616662457 pps.sagepub.com Henry L. Roediger, III Washington University in St. Louis Abstract Fame in psychology, as in all arenas, is a local phenomenon. Psychologists (and probably academics in all fields) often first become well known for studying a subfield of an area (say, the study of attention in cognitive psychology, or even certain tasks used to study attention). Later, the researcher may become famous within cognitive psychology. In a few cases, researchers break out of a discipline to become famous across psychology and (more rarely still) even outside the confines of academe. The progression is slow and uneven. Fame is also temporally constricted. The most famous psychologists today will be forgotten in less than a century, just as the greats from the era of World War I are rarely read or remembered today. Freud and a few others represent exceptions to the rule, but generally fame is fleeting and each generation seems to dispense with the lessons learned by previous ones to claim their place in the sun. Keywords fame in psychology, scientific eminence, history of psychology, forgetting First, please take a quiz. Below is a list of eight names. done. (Hilgard’s, 1987, history text was better known Please look at each name and answer the following three than his scientific work that propelled him to eminence.) questions: (a) Do you recognize this name as belonging Perhaps some of you recognized another name or two to a famous psychologist? (b) If so, what area of study without much knowing why or what they did.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Conceptual Maps in Introductory Psychology
    Using Conceptual Maps in Introductory Psychology •Identify 10-15 key concepts or topics in the course –Classical vs. operant conditioning –Genetics and environmental interactions –Types of forgetting –Theoretical Perspectives –Cognitive, Social and Moral development –Descriptive, Correlational and Experimental Methods –Neuronal vs. synaptic transmission –Processes in human memory –Altered states of consciousness –Theories of dreaming –Schedules of reinforcement –Brain structures and functions Pick 5 to review Write the concept or topic at the top of a piece of blank paper In your own words, write an explanation or definition for each concept Do not use your text or notes Draw a web, or use a chart where possible Include names where important Compare your response to your text or notes and edit Sequence and number each page from 1=most important to 5=least important in terms of your study time Do the whole process again for the next group of concepts Integrate the numbering to guide you in scheduling what to work on first Example of a Conceptual Map Development Prenatal Infancy and Childhood Genetics Environment Attachment XX=girl teratogen biology sets limits XY=boy FAS enviro influences from sperm bio & env interact Cognitive Moral Psychosocial Piaget Vygotsky Kohlberg Erikson Piaget Vygotsky Stages: Continual, gradual process 1. Sensorimotor •Birth to 2 yrs Zone of proximal development •Object perm. -Experience can change 2. Preoper’tl development within limits of •2-7 years biological maturation •Centration 3. Concrete Theory of Mind Operational -understanding other people’s •7-12 years thinking •Conservation -similar to egocentrism 4. Formal operational •>12 years abstract thought Erikson Kohlberg Stages: Stages: 1.Trust/mistrust <1 year Preconventional •1.punishment/obey 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory
    IFM LAB TUTORIAL SERIES # 6, COPYRIGHT c IFM LAB Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory Jiawei Zhang [email protected] Founder and Director Information Fusion and Mining Laboratory (First Version: May 2019; Revision: May 2019.) Abstract This is a follow-up tutorial article of [17] and [16], in this paper, we will introduce several important cognitive functions of the brain. Brain cognitive functions are the mental processes that allow us to receive, select, store, transform, develop, and recover information that we've received from external stimuli. This process allows us to understand and to relate to the world more effectively. Cognitive functions are brain-based skills we need to carry out any task from the simplest to the most complex. They are related with the mechanisms of how we learn, remember, problem-solve, and pay attention, etc. To be more specific, in this paper, we will talk about the perception, attention and memory functions of the human brain. Several other brain cognitive functions, e.g., arousal, decision making, natural language, motor coordination, planning, problem solving and thinking, will be added to this paper in the later versions, respectively. Many of the materials used in this paper are from wikipedia and several other neuroscience introductory articles, which will be properly cited in this paper. This is the last of the three tutorial articles about the brain. The readers are suggested to read this paper after the previous two tutorial articles on brain structure and functions [17] as well as the brain basic neural units [16]. Keywords: The Brain; Cognitive Function; Consciousness; Attention; Learning; Memory Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Perception 3 2.1 Detailed Process of Perception .
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology 230 History, Systems, & Theories
    1 Psychology 230 History, Systems, & Theories Fall 2015 Class meets on Monday and Wednesday from 11:45am to 12:55pm in PPHAC 235 Overview: Historical origins of contemporary psychology, including structuralism, associationism, functionalism, behaviorism, Gestalt, and psychoanalysis, as well as recent developments in the field. Prerequisite: Psychology 120. Dana S. Dunn, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Hurd Academic Complex Room 231 Office phone: (610) 861-1562 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Fall 2015 Office hours: Monday By appointment Tuesday 1:30 – 3pm Wednesday By appointment Thursday 1:30 – 3 pm Friday 8:30 – 10:30am Course Goals: 1. To introduce you to the historical development of the scientific study of psychology. 2. To show you where psychology fits in the history of ideas in Western thought. 3. To understand key issues, themes, and controversies that shaped (and continue to shape) the contemporary discipline. Required Books: Freud, S. (1989). On dreams. New York: Norton. Leahey, T. H. (2013). A history of psychology: From antiquity to modernity (7th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson. Skinner, B. F. (1976). Walden Two. New York: Macmillan. Course Requirements 1. Class participation and attendance. This course requires constant attendance, active participation and critical discussion of the readings. I expect that you will attend each and every class, and that you will come prepared to talk about—and question—what you read. Class participation is worth 15% of your final course grade. Please note that I will be taking role, thus your absence from class will affect your participation grade (i.e., if you are not in class, you cannot contribute to discussion).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Getting Familiar with Matlab
    THE PREHISTORY OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE THE REACTION AGAINST BEHAVIORISM IN PSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIORISM?? (BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOLOGY) All behaviors are acquired through conditioning. Everything from speech to emotional responses were simply patterns of stimulus and learned response. Only observable behavior should be considered (cognitions, emotions, and moods are too subjective – ignore them all!) John B. Watson “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It” 1913 "Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I'll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select—doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief and, yes, even beggar-man and thief, regardless of his talents, penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors." BEHAVIORISM?? (BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOLOGY) Two types of conditioning: Classical conditioning: association between US and CS, CS results in conditioned behavioral response Operant conditioning: learning that occurs through reinforcement and punishment, association between a behavior and a consequence for that behavior CLASSICAL CONDITIONING LITTLE ALBERT EXPERIMENT (PHOBIAS) Watson and Rayner (1920) OPERANT CONDITIONING SKINNER BOX REINFORCEMENT THEORY CLASSICAL CONDITIONING VS. OPERANT CONDITIONING THREE LANDMARK PAPERS 1. Tolman and Honzik (1930): Latent Learning 2. Tolman et al. (1946): Sequential learning? Vs. Cognitive spatial map? 3. Lashley (1951): Importance of planning and organization 1. LATENT LEARNING LATENT LEARNING ▪ Learning in Behaviorism ▪ All learning is the result of conditioning ▪ Conditioning depends upon processes of association and reinforcement ➢ So learning is either reinforcement learning or simpler associative learning RAT MAZE LATENT LEARNING 1. First group: get rewarded every time 2. Second group: never get rewarded 3.
    [Show full text]