The Political Philosophy of Franciscus Zabarella As Seen in His Public Addresses and Other Works

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Political Philosophy of Franciscus Zabarella As Seen in His Public Addresses and Other Works Chapter 2 The Political Philosophy of Franciscus Zabarella as Seen in His Public Addresses and Other Works Thomas E. Morrissey Franciscus Zabarella had a distinguished career as a professor of canon law first in Florence (1385–90), and then for the most part in Padua (1390–1410). 1 He then went on to exert a major influence in bringing about the summoning and assembling of the Council of Constance.2 Once at Constance he was a dominant presence in all the events at the council until his death on Septem- ber 26, 1417, which came only a few weeks before the council was able to end the Great Western Schism by electing one person as pope to be accepted by all, thus bringing about the unity in the Latin Western church for which Zabarella had struggled for many years.3 The process by which this unity was achieved revealed what we might describe as the political philosophy of Zabarella, 1 A detailed look at Zabarella’s career has been amply provided in Dieter Girgensohn, “Fran- ciscus Zabarella aus Padua: Gelehrsamkeit und politisches Wirken eines Rechtsprofessors während des grossen abendländischen Schismas,” Zeitschrift der Savigny- Stiftung für Rechts- geschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung 79 (1993), 232– 77; and Thomas E. Morrissey, “Ein unruhig- es Leben: Franciscus Zabarella an der Universität von Padua (1390–1410), Die Welt Nikolaus von Kues vorfand,” Mitteilungen und Forschungsbeiträge der Cusanus Gesellschaft 24 (1998), 5– 40. The latter article has been republished in Morrissey, Conciliarism and Church Law in the Fifteenth Century: Studies on Franciscus Zabarella and the Council of Constance (Variorum Collected Studies Series) cs 1043 (Farnham: 2014), henceforth, Morrissey, Conciliarism and Church Law. Still useful are two earlier studies, Gasparo Zonta, Francesco Zabarella (1360– 1417) (Padua: 1915), and August Kneer, Kardinal Zabarella (Franciscus de Zabarellis, Cardinalis Florentinus 1360– 1417): Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des grossen abendländischen Schismas, vol. 1, PhD dissertation, Münster, 1891. 2 Thomas E. Morrissey, “Cardinal Franciscus Zabarella (1360– 1417) as a Canonist and the Crisis of his Age: Schism and the Council of Constance,” Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 96 (1985), 196– 208, now also in Morrissey, Conciliarism and Church Law, viii, and idem, “The Crisis of Authority at the End of the Fourteenth Century: A Canonist’s Response,” Mediaevalia 9 (1983), 251– 67. 3 Thomas E. Morrissey, “Emperor- Elect Sigismund, Cardinal Zabarella and the Council of Con- stance,” Catholic Historical Review 69 (1983), 353– 70; idem, “The Call for Unity at the Coun- cil of Constance: Sermons and Addresses of Cardinal Zabarella,” Church History 53 (1984), 307– 18; and idem, “ ‘More Easily and More Securely’: Legal Procedure and Due Process at the Council of Constance,” in Popes, Teachers and Canon Law in the Middle Ages: Festschrift for Brian Tierney, eds. James R. Sweeney and Stanley Chodorow (Ithaca, N.Y.: 1989), pp. 234– 47. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2019 | DOI:10.1163/ 9789004382411_ 003 16 Morrissey which he shared with a good number, but not all, of his contemporaries and participants at the council. His ideas on government and the relations between a leader or ruler and the body which he governed were articulated on a num- ber of occasions before the Council of Constance, as well as during its proceed- ings. Since Zabarella had in his studies achieved a doctorate in both laws (civil and canon) and was often responding to questions and situations in either the civil or the ecclesiastical sphere, it is clear that he freely moved back and forth between the two areas and often transferred ideas and principles from govern- ment in civil society to the comparable function in the Church, and vice versa.4 He clearly had a strong idea of what a good leader should be like and how he should act, as well as what the community should be like, what the duties of each part were, and the limitations on the exercise of power and authority by the entity on the top and by the subjects within that body. Less- known sources of Zabarella’s thinking can be found in the number of addresses and writings he composed during his busy life as a teacher and advisor and in which he expressed his thoughts on officers and their duties.5 Besides these there is an interesting statement by Zabarella which we might find quaint, since his ob- servation says as much by what it does not say as it does by what it asserts. In his commentary on the Clementinae, Zabarella took up the role of the emperor as advocatus ecclesiae.6 He stated that it was the duty of the emperor to defend All three of these are now in Morrissey, Conciliarism and Church Law, vi, vii, and ix, respec- tively. 4 One instance of this was when Zabarella was asked about the legality of the deposition of Wenzel as King of the Romans by the imperial electors in 1400 on the grounds of his failure to fulfill the duties of his office. Zabarella supported and defended their action in a consilium which Heinrich Finke cited over a century ago, “Ein Gutachten Zabarellas über die Abset- zung des römischen Königs Wenzel,” Mitteilungen des Instituts für österreichische Geschichts- forschung 11 (1890), 631– 33. 5 The four most prominent of these are: Zeitz Stiftsbibliothek, folio 48; Stift St Paul in Lavanttal (Austria), paper 31/ 4; Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, cod. lat. 5513; and Pom- mersfelden, Graf von Schönborn Schlossbibliothek, 168. They will henceforth be referred to as Zeitz, St Paul, Wien, and Pommersfelden in the notes. 6 The attribution of this title advocatus ecclesiae to the Holy Roman Emperor had a long his- tory in canonistic circles and is found often in their writings. It therefore appears often in Zabarella’s legal animadversions, and it was the basis for his working with Emperor- Elect Sigismund to make the Council of Constance happen. But at the Council of Constance in 1417, when disputes and controversies reached a high point on exactly what this position entailed, Zabarella broke with the emperor and denounced what he saw as an abuse of his power and an attempt not to guide and protect the Church, but rather to dominate the pro- ceedings at the council and force it to conform to his plans and desires. On this denouement of their relationship see Morrissey, “Emperor- Elect Sigismund,” pp. 355–61, 365–70, and now also Ansgar Frenken, “Römische König und Kurfürsten auf den spätmittelalterlichen Gener- alkonzilien: Stellung, Einflussnahme und Bedeutung der führenden politischen Kräfte des .
Recommended publications
  • Pope John the Twenty-Third and Master John Hus of Bohemia
    POPE JOHN THE TWENTY-THIRD AND MASTER JOHN HUS OF BOHEMIA POPE JOHN THE TWENTY-THIRD AND MASTER JOHN HUS OF BOHEMIA BY EUSTACE J. KITTS A. UTHOR OF 'IN THE DAYS OF THE COUNCILS' ILLUSTRATED LONDON CONSTABLE AND COMPANY LIMITED 10 ORANGE STREET LEICESTER SQUARE 1910 INTRODUCTION IN this book I have endeavoured to narrate the five years' history of three men and a movement; the men are Pope John the Twenty-third, John Hus, the patriot reformer of Bohemia, and Sigismund, King of the Romans; and the movement is the conciliar movement up to the middle of the year 1415. I have already, in my book entitled In the Days ef the Councils, given the history of Baldassare Cossa, who became Pope John the Twenty-third, up to the death of Pope Alexander the Fifth. Baldassare Cossa was in no sense a hero; there were indeed very few heroes in those days. One thing which makes history so much more interesting than fiction is that the characters have their human frailties as well as their human virtues. 'Il n'y a pas,' says M. Boissier, 'de gens parfaits que dans les romans.' Baldassare Cossa was simply a strong man placed in a position for which he had striven hut for which he was eminently unfit, struggling with adversity. It is in the struggle that the interest of his story lies. Up till the battle of Rocca Secca all went well with him; after that, Fate was consistentlv against him. He had the misfortune to have for an enemy one of the foremost literary men of his time; and literary men then said all that they knew was true, all that they thought was true, and much that they hoped was true.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Hus in Medieval Czech Hagiography
    Jan Hus in Medieval Czech Hagiography Thomas A. Fudge (Armidale, Australia) The Relatio of Petr of Mladoňovice quickly became the textus receptus of accounts of Jan Hus’s life, and especially his death, among Hus’s followers in the Czech lands.1 Petr’s narrative has been subjected to considerable schol- arly investigation and has played an enormous role in the construction of the memory of Hus. The importance of the Relatio noted, there are several other fifteenth-century “lives” which merit careful consideration for the way in which they present Hus, the role they play in the formation of his memory, and their value in terms of understanding the religious world of late medieval Bohemia. This essay examines two of these “lives” in an effort to learn more about Hus’s evolution into a saint and also to rescue these sources from con- tinued obscurity.2 Two Hagiographies The term “lives” in this context refers not to biographies in the modern sense, but to narratives which explore, assess, and create memory. With reference to Jan Hus, this memory was of an ideal Christian man and a popular saint. Of course, there was no single form of sanctity or sainthood in the Latin Middle Ages. One might come to the status of a saint in many different ways. Jan Hus represents one of those pathways. Because hagiography has proven to be an important source for social history and, by extension, the history of medieval popular religion and mentalities,3 an examination of how saints were created reveals much about the communities that came to venerate them and the 1 Petr of Mladoňovice, Relatio de Mag.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Concilio Di Costanza Come Centro Di Produzione Manoscritta Degli Umanisti
    Il Concilio di Costanza come centro di produzione manoscritta degli umanisti VON CONCETTA BIANCA (Florenz) Il 18 maggio 1416 Bartolomeo Capra1), arcivescovo di Milano, scriveva da Costanza a Uberto Decembrio affinché gli procurasse un codice di Cesare (omnia gesta Caii Iulii Caesaris), in quanto l’imperatore Sigismondo ne desiderava una copia: la richiesta, che era consona agli interessi di un sovrano, e che del resto rispecchiava la rinnovata attenzione per i testi cesariani2), non poteva però essere immediatamente esaudita in quanto, dopo la dipartita della curia, Bartolomeo Capra poteva solo constatare »l’incredibile assenza di libri«3). Evidentemente Capra intendeva la curia di Gregorio Xii, il pontefice che il 4 luglio 1415 a Costanza aveva rinunciato alla tiara, divenendo poi legato della Marca Anconitana4): 1) Dieter Girgensohn, Capra, Bartolomeo della, in: Dizionario biografico degli Italiani, vol. 19, Roma 1976, pp. 108–113; Johannes Helmrath, Diffusion des Humanismus und Antikerezeption auf den Kon- zilien von Konstanz, Basel und Ferrara-Florenz, in: Die Präsenz der Antike im Übergang vom Mittelalter zur Frühen Neuzeit, a cura di Ludger Grenzmann/Klaus Grubmüller, Göttingen 2004, pp. 9–54; Ale- xander Patschovsky, Der italienische Humanismus auf dem Konstanzer Konzil (1414–1418) (Konstanzer Universitätsreden 198), Konstanz 1999; Brigide Schwarz, Kurienuniversität und stadtrömische Universität von ca. 1300 bis 1471 (Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance 46), Leiden 2013. 2) Virginia Brown, Caesar Gaius Iulius, in: Catalogus translationum et commentariorum. Medieval and Renaissance Latin Translations and Commentaries, vol. 3, a cura di Ferdinand Edward Cranz, Washington D. C. 1976, pp. 88–139; Ead., Portraits of Julius Caesar in Latin Manuscripts of the Commentaries, in: Viator 12 (1981), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Library of Congress Classification
    KB RELIGIOUS LAW IN GENERAL. COMPARATIVE RELIGIOUS LAW. KB JURISPRUDENCE Religious law in general. Comparative religious law. Jurisprudence Class here comparative studies on different religious legal systems, as well as intra-denominational comparisons (e.g. different Christian religious legal systems) Further, class here comparative studies on religious legal systems with other legal systems, including ancient law For comparison of a religious legal system with the law of two or more jurisdictions, see the religious system (e.g. Islamic law compared to Egyptian and Malaysian law, see KBP) Comparisons include both systematic-theoretical elaborations as well as parallel presentations of different systems For influences of a religious legal system on the law of a particuar jurisdiction, see the jurisdiction For works on law and religion see BL65.L33 Bibliography For personal bibliography or bibliography relating to a particular religious system or subject, see the appropriate KB subclass 2 Bibliography of bibliography. Bibliographical concordances 4 Indexes for periodical literature, society publications, collections, etc. Periodicals For KB8-KB68, the book number, derived from the main entry, is determined by the letters following the letter for which the class number stands, e.g. KB11.I54, Dine Yisrael 7 General Jewish 8 A - Archiu 8.3 Archiv - Archivz e.g. 8.3.R37 Archives d'histoire du droit oriental 9 Archiw - Az 9.3 B e.g. 9.3.U43 Bulletin/International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists 10 C 11 D e.g. 11.I54 Dine Yisrael: shanaton le-mishpat ʻIvri ule-mishpahah be-Yiʼsrael 12 E - Etuder 12.3 Etudes - Ez 13 F 14 G 15 H 16 I e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSIC in the RENAISSANCE Western Music in Context: a Norton History Walter Frisch Series Editor
    MUSIC IN THE RENAISSANCE Western Music in Context: A Norton History Walter Frisch series editor Music in the Medieval West, by Margot Fassler Music in the Renaissance, by Richard Freedman Music in the Baroque, by Wendy Heller Music in the Eighteenth Century, by John Rice Music in the Nineteenth Century, by Walter Frisch Music in the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries, by Joseph Auner MUSIC IN THE RENAISSANCE Richard Freedman Haverford College n W. W. NORTON AND COMPANY Ƌ ƋĐƋ W. W. Norton & Company has been independent since its founding in 1923, when William Warder Norton and Mary D. Herter Norton first published lectures delivered at the People’s Institute, the adult education division of New York City’s Cooper Union. The firm soon expanded its program beyond the Institute, publishing books by celebrated academics from America and abroad. By midcentury, the two major pillars of Norton’s publishing program—trade books and college texts— were firmly established. In the 1950s, the Norton family transferred control of the company to its employees, and today—with a staff of four hundred and a comparable number of trade, college, and professional titles published each year—W. W. Norton & Company stands as the largest and oldest publishing house owned wholly by its employees. Copyright © 2013 by W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Editor: Maribeth Payne Associate Editor: Justin Hoffman Assistant Editor: Ariella Foss Developmental Editor: Harry Haskell Manuscript Editor: Bonnie Blackburn Project Editor: Jack Borrebach Electronic Media Editor: Steve Hoge Marketing Manager, Music: Amy Parkin Production Manager: Ashley Horna Photo Editor: Stephanie Romeo Permissions Manager: Megan Jackson Text Design: Jillian Burr Composition: CM Preparé Manufacturing: Quad/Graphics-Fairfield, PA A catalogue record is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 978-0-393-92916-4 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Viator Ducens Ad Celestia: Eucharistic Piety, Papal Politics, and an Early Fifteenth-Century Motet
    Viator ducens ad celestia: Eucharistic Piety, Papal Politics, and an Early Fifteenth-Century Motet BENJAMIN BRAND I On the morning of 26 March 1409 the Col- lege of Cardinals, along with over one hundred abbots, bishops, arch- bishops, and ambassadors from throughout Europe, gathered in the cathedral of Pisa to inaugurate an unprecedented event: a church 250 council intended to oust not one, but two popes. According to the council acts, the first session featured a sermon delivered by the Fran- ciscan friar and cardinal of Milan, Pietro Filargo of Candia (henceforth referred to as Peter of Candia).1 Sitting in the bishop’s throne, clothed in his pluvial and white mitre, Peter provided a masterful defense of I wish to thank Margot Fassler, Anne Walters Robertson, Ellen Rosand, Pamela Starr, and Craig Wright for carefully reading earlier versions of this article, and Stephen Rodgers for his assis- tance with the musical example. In addition, Margaret Bent and an anonymous reader provided valuable suggestions regarding the final draft. A condensed version was presented at the meeting of the New England Chapter of the American Musicological Society in April 2003 and at the Medieval and Renaissance Music Conference in Jena, Germany in July 2003. Research was conducted with the support of the Jerry Knoll Traveling Summer Fellowship for Third-Year Undergraduates at the University of Chicago. Unless otherwise noted, all translations are my own. 1 For a description of the ceremony, see Giovanni Domenico Mansi, Sacrorum Concil- iorum, Nova, et Amplissima Collectio (Florence: Expensis Antonii Zatta, 1759–1927), vol. 26, col.
    [Show full text]
  • Orazio Condorelli Curriculum Dell'attività Scientifica E Didattica
    Orazio Condorelli Curriculum dell’attività scientifica e didattica Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza Università degli Studi di Catania tel.: 095-230417 (università) e-mail: [email protected] Orazio Condorelli (1966) è professore ordinario di Diritto Canonico e Diritto Ecclesiastico (settore scientifico disciplinare IUS/11: Diritto canonico e diritto ecclesiastico) presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell’Università degli Studi di Catania dal 30-12-2006. Laurea in Giurisprudenza (28 luglio 1990) con il massimo dei voti e la lode con tesi in Storia del diritto italiano, relatore il Prof. Manlio Bellomo. Nel 1994 ha conseguito il titolo di Dottore di Ricerca in “Storia del Diritto Italiano con particolare riferimento alla Storia del Diritto Medievale e al Diritto Comune”. Dal 1996 al 1997 è stato titolare, presso l’Università degli Studi di Catania, di una borsa di studio per attività di ricerca post-dottorato nel settore “Storia del Diritto Italiano con particolare riferimento alla Storia del Diritto Medievale e al Diritto Comune”. Ricercatore di Storia del Diritto Italiano dal 1996 al 2002. Professore associato di Diritto Canonico e Diritto Ecclesiastico dal 2002 al 2003. Professore straordinario di Diritto Canonico e Diritto Ecclesiastico dal 31 dicembre 2003 al 2006. Professore ordinario di Diritto Canonico e Diritto Ecclesiastico dal 2006 a oggi. Dall’anno accademico 2002/2003 al 2010/2011 ha tenuto il corso di Storia del Diritto Canonico presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza di Catania. Dall’anno accademico 2005/2006 al 2010/2011 ha tenuto il corso di Diritto Ecclesiastico presso la Facoltà di Giurisprudenza di Catania, Corso di Laurea con sede a Ragusa.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law
    BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW NEW SERIES 2018 VOLUME 35 AN ANNUAL REVIEW PUBLISHED BY THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW BULLETIN OF MEDIEVAL CANON LAW NEW SERIES 2018 VOLUME 35 AN ANNUAL REVIEW PUBLISHED BY THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA PRESS Founded by Stephan G. Kuttner and Published Annually Editorial correspondence and manuscripts in electronic format should be sent to: PETER LANDAU AND KENNETH PENNINGTON, Editors The School of Canon Law The Catholic University of America Washington, D.C. 20064 [email protected] MELODIE H. EICHBAUER, Reviews and Bibliography Editor Florida Gulf Coast University Department of Social Sciences 10501 FGCU Blvd, South Fort Myers, Florida 33965 [email protected] Advisory Board PÉTER CARDINAL ERDŐ CHRISTOF ROLKER Archbishop of Esztergom Universität Bamberg Budapest FRANCK ROUMY ORAZIO CONDORELLI Université Panthéon-Assas Università degli Studi Paris II di Catania DANICA SUMMERLIN ANTONIA FIORI University of Sheffield La Sapienza, Rome JOSÉ MIGUEL VIÉJO-XIMÉNEZ PETER LINEHAN Universidad de Las Palmas de St. John’s College Gran Canaria Cambridge University Inquiries concerning subscriptions or notifications of change of address should be sent to the Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law Subscriptions, PO Box 19966, Baltimore, MD 21211-0966. Notifications can also be sent by email to [email protected] telephone 410-516-6987 or 1-800-548-1784 or fax 410-516-3866. Subscription prices: United States $90 institutions; $40 individuals. Single copies $95 institutions, $50 individuals. The articles in the Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law are abstracted in Canon Law Abstracts, Catholic Periodical and Literature Index ISSN: 0146-2989 Typeset annually and printed at 450 Fame Avenue, Hanover, PA 17331 by The Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Competenze Canonistiche Di Un Civilista Usura, Questione Ebraica E Conflitti Di Giurisdizione Nei Consilia Di Paolo Da Castro
    Università degli Studi di Milano – Bicocca Dottorato in Scienze Giuridiche Curriculum in Storia del diritto medievale e moderno Le competenze canonistiche di un civilista Usura, questione ebraica e conflitti di giurisdizione nei consilia di Paolo da Castro Bernardo Pieri Matr. 775150 XXVIII Ciclo – a. a. 2014/2015 INDICE INTRODUZIONE 1. «Qui fu Castro». Vita Pauli per verba magistri p. 5 2. Sui consilia . L’occhio della storiografia 21 3. Giustificazione del lavoro e modus operandi 26 CAPITOLO I Duæ potestates, duæ iurisdictiones, duo fora sunt – una aequitas 0. Agli albori dell’ utrumque ius 45 1. La sistemazione bartoliana 50 2. La posizione di Baldo: tra implicite conferme e stravaganze 53 3. Per alteram viam . I diversi interessi di due grandi politologi del Trecento: Oldrado da Ponte e Lorenzo Ridolfi 58 4. Paolo da Castro tra enunciazione di principio e mobilità della prassi 63 5. Un contenuto etico nella solutio dei responsi? 70 6. Il foro ecclesiastico come estrema risorsa a tutela delle miserabiles personae 76 7. Altri intrecci, nuovi contrasti: il caso spinoso delle legittimazioni e una prospettiva rovesciata 82 1 CAPITOLO II L’usura, oʃʃ ia economia e morale son due cognate 1. Storia di una polemica secolare 93 2. L’intervento del legislatore ecclesiastico: l’usura da peccato di cupidigia a peccatum secundum se 104 3. Prima eccezione al divieto: la liceità dell’interesse 109 4. L’idea di ‘capitale’ secondo l’ œconomia francescana 113 5. I primi, impacciati interventi della dottrina civilistica 121 6. Bartolo da Sassoferrato: tra velleità e reticenze 125 7. Intermedio I . L’usura tra gli ebrei, fra divieti ed esercizio 133 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 21 —,M— E-Mail: [email protected] 2001 Telephone: +39-055-603-251 / Fax: +39-055-603-383
    The Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies Villa I Tatti Via di Vincigliata 26, 50135 Florence, Italy Volume 21 —,m— E-mail: [email protected] 2001 Telephone: +39-055-603-251 / Fax: +39-055-603-383 his year’s “Letter from Florence” tural plans for this have long since been Tcomes, in fact, not from Florence Letter From Florence drawn, and a considerable part of the at all. Unexpectedly, I am writing it P money has been raised, yet until yester- from Manhattan, on a steamy August day we have been stymied by the morning in a room high over refractory Fiesolan bureau- the East River. As I look in cracy. It has been ten years the direction of Montauk, Italy now since we first applied for is an indiscernible speck on an permits to replace the indeterminable horizon, hid- unsightly row of shabby den by the curvature of the garages at the back of the earth. Yet uncannily, I Tatti parking lot with a handsome itself is very much present in new building, essentially the this room. I’ve been spending same size and in the same every morning in e-mail com- footprint, which will provide munication with members of an office for each Fellow and a the staff, working on acade- room for small lectures or mic, budgetary, and other seminars. What should have matters, and I’ve been confer- been a simple matter was ring regularly with Charles transformed into a Kafkaesque Brickbauer, our devoted archi- labyrinth by interminable tect, about current and future Walter Kaiser and Allen Grieco delays, tergiversations, equivo- building renovations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Michael De Causis in the Prosecution of Jan Hus
    The Role of Michael de Causis in the Prosecution of Jan Hus Thomas A. Fudge (Armidale, NSW) Introduction Michael de Causis can reasonably be characterised as unscrupulous, unethi- cal, ruthless, malevolent, and dishonest; hardly a compelling resumé. His name is known to all those familiar with the last five years in the life of Jan Hus. Investigating the broad range of sources from the Hus affair reveals that Michael de Causis exerted influence on the former Prague inquisitor Mařík Rvačka, the canon lawyer Jiří Bor, the conciliar ideologue Dietrich Niem, and Pope John XXIII, among others. We find him working hallways and court- rooms at the curia, enmeshed in politics and power -brokering and wielding influence over legal proceedings. It is Michael de Causis who formulates ar- ticles of accusation against Hus. We find him among the movers and shakers at the Council of Constance, where he is not only a blunt force against Hus, but also incited action against the Prague preacher’s friends. De Causis can be seen posting inflammatory public notices about town attacking Hus. He is discovered badgering witnesses, suggesting the virtues of perjury or care- less testimony. We find him lurking near Hus’ prison on many occasions. He is found submitting personal testimony against Hus. On one or two occa- sions, de Causis is behind specific lobbying to the court. Beyond this, we find him engaged in overt harassment of the prisoner by interfering with mail, in restricting people from visiting Hus, and in boasts to prison guards that he intends to see the accused burned at the stake.
    [Show full text]
  • Et Poetis Ipsis Necessarium Argentum / Humanistische Selbstdarstellungsstrategien Auf Dem Konzil Von Konstanz
    Et poetis ipsis necessarium argentum / Humanistische Selbstdarstellungsstrategien auf dem Konzil von Konstanz Dissertation zur Erlangung des philosophischen Doktorgrades an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen vorgelegt von Zsuzsanna Kiséry aus Debrecen Göttingen 2009 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Haye 2. 3. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Johannes Helmrath Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 24. 11. 2010 Inhaltsverzeichnis I. EINLEITUNG ......................................................................................................................... 5 1. Humanismus: ein proteisches Phänomen ....................................................................................................... 5 2. Mode ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 3. Die Rhetorik des Bruches und ihre Rolle in den Selbstdarstellungsstrategien ............................................. 13 4. Kontextbezogenheit ...................................................................................................................................... 19 5. Wahrnehmung: Ein Spaziergang von den Humanisten bis zu den Hirnforschern und wieder zurück ......... 20 6. Gruppenbildung, Nationendiskurs ................................................................................................................ 25 7. Meine Beispiele ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]