DOCSLIB.ORG

Countryside Properties PLC Annual Report 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ANNUAL REPORT 2017 REPORT ANNUAL COUNTRYSIDE PROPERTIES PLC / ANNUAL REPORT 2017 COUNTRYSIDE’S DIFFERENTIATED BUSINESS MODEL “Countryside is a leading UK homebuilder specialising in placemaking and urban regeneration. Our balanced business model delivers this regeneration from our Partnerships division, together with larger scale communities from our strategic land-led Housebuilding division.” Ian Sutcliffe Group Chief Executive Strategic report Governance Financial statements 2 Group at a glance 40 Chairman’s introduction 78 Independent auditor’s report to governance 4 2017 performance 84 Consolidated statement and highlights 42 Board of Directors of comprehensive income 5 Chairman’s statement 44 Executive Committee 85 Consolidated statement 6 Group Chief Executive’s review 46 Corporate governance report of financial position 8 Our markets 52 Report of the Audit 86 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 10 Our business model Committee 87 Consolidated cash 12 Our strategy 56 Report of the Nomination Committee flow statement 14 Key performance indicators 57 Directors’ remuneration 88 Notes to the consolidated 18 Operational review report financial statements 18 Partnerships 59 Remuneration policy report Parent company 22 Housebuilding 67 Annual report on financial statements 26 Group Chief Financial remuneration 119 Parent company statement of Officer’s review 74 Directors’ report financial position 30 Our people 77 Statement of Directors’ 120 Parent company statement of 32 Sustainability report responsibilities changes in equity 36 Risk management 121 Notes to the parent company financial statements IBC Shareholder information Countryside Properties PLC // Annual report 2017 All text and images to be supplied 1 Strategic report PARTNERSHIPS Our Partnerships division Governance specialises in urban regeneration of public sector land, delivering private and affordable homes in partnership with local authorities and housing associations. It operates in outer London, the West Midlands and North West England. Read more on pages 18 to 21 Financial statements HOUSEBUILDING Our Housebuilding division develops private and affordable homes on land owned or controlled by the Group, located in outer London and the Home Counties. It operates under the Countryside and Millgate brands. Read more on pages 22 to 25 Countryside Properties PLC // Annual report 2017 Group at a glance 2 CREATING PLACES PEOPLE LOVE Our mixed-tenure approach to creating communities in both divisions, has delivered strong growth in completions across the Group in 2017. Private Rental Sector Private 21% 49% 3,389 homes Affordable 30% Private Rental Sector 33% Private Affordable Private 38% 30% 70% 2,192 1,197 homes homes Affordable 29% PARTNERSHIPS HOUSEBUILDING Continued Partnerships growth in our existing markets Strong growth in private homes has driven total of London and the North West of England has been completions to record levels. The Housebuilding supplemented by delivery of 180 homes in our new division has gained greater scale in each of our regions West Midlands region. around London. Read more Read more on pages 18 to 21 on pages 22 to 25 Countryside Properties PLC // Annual report 2017 3 9 Strategic report years’ visibility in our Partnerships division 83% of our Housebuilding land bank Governance is strategically sourced Financial statements PARTNERSHIPS HOUSEBUILDING OUR INVESTMENT CASE • Impressive track record of winning new business • Increasing scale with established platform for growth Countryside has a strong track record of placemaking and benefits from long-term relationships in both • Low-capital Partnerships model the Partnerships and Housebuilding divisions. • Strong balance sheet with capacity for growth • Balanced business model with two complementary divisions • Long-established supply chain • Excellent visibility through Partnerships pipeline and Housebuilding land bank Countryside Properties PLC // Annual report 2017 2017 performance and highlights 4 Adjusted revenue1 £m Adjusted operating profit2,3 £m Adjusted operating margin3 % £1,028.8m £164.1m 16.0% +32% +34% +20bps 17 476.7 552.1 1,028.8 17 79.4 91.5 164.1 17 16.7 16.6 16.0 16 349.9 427.1 777.0 16 56.8 68.1 122.5 16 16.2 15.9 15.8 15 285.1 330.7 615.8 15 39.6 51.6 91.2 15 13.9 15.6 14.8 Return on capital employed4 % Tangible net asset value5 £m Land bank # plots 30.5% £627.0m 34,581 +370bps +17% +27% 17 77.5 21.0 30.5 17 116.0 511.0 627.0 17 14,755 19,826 34,581 16 72.1 18.0 26.8 16 105.6 431.8 537.4 16 7,881 19,322 27,204 15 69.4 16.6 24.7 15 45.9 283.1 329.0 15 7,803 18,410 26,213 • Completions up 28 per cent to 3,389 homes • Reported revenue up 26 per cent to £845.8m (2016: 2,657 homes) (2016: £671.3m) • Private average selling price (“ASP”) down 8 per cent • Reported operating profit up 48 per cent to £128.9m to £430,000 (2016: £465,000) (2016: £87.3m) • Net reservation rates increased to 0.84 (2016: 0.78) • Net cash of £77.4m (2016: £12.0m) • Open sales outlets up 9 per cent at 47 (2016: 43) • Basic earnings per share of 26.0 pence (2016: 13.6 pence) • Private forward order book up 8 per cent to £242.4m • Accident Incident Rate (“AIR”) of 220 (2016: 305) (2016: £225.4m) • NHBC Recommend a Friend score of 88.6 per cent • Total land bank increased to 34,581 (2016: 27,204) (2016: 84.8 per cent) • Adjusted earnings per share of 27.8 pence (2016: 16.3 pence) Read more on our KPIs on pages 14 to 17 Key 1. Adjusted revenue includes the Group’s share of revenue from associate and joint ventures of £183.0m (2016: £105.7m; 2015: £68.3m). 2. Adjusted operating profit includes the Group’s share of operating profit from associate and joint Group ventures of £33.6m (2016: £25.3m; 2015: £16.7m) and excludes non-underlying items of £1.6m (2016: £9.9m; 2015: £6.6m). Partnerships 3. Divisional adjusted operating profit excludes Group items of £6.8m (2016: £2.4m; 2015: £1.2m), comprising share-based payment expense of £5.1m (2016: £1.1m; 2015: £Nil) and brand Housebuilding amortisation of £1.7m (2016: £1.3m; 2015: £1.2m). 4. Return on capital employed (“ROCE”) is calculated as adjusted operating profit divided by average tangible net operating assets value (“TNOAV”). TNOAV is calculated as tangible net asset value excluding net cash. 5. Divisional tangible net asset value (“TNAV”) is calculated as divisional TNOAV plus net cash allocated pro rata based on divisional TNOAV. Countryside Properties PLC // Annual report 2017 Chairman’s statement 5 A YEAR OF Strategic report SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS As we enter 2018, our key areas of focus Governance continue to be to support implementation of the Group’s business strategy, to deepen the succession planning for the Board and Executive Committee and to ensure that corporate governance and risk management mitigation plans are embedded across the business. There were two Board changes during the course of the year. On 26 May 2017, we announced that Oaktree had completed a sale of shares in Countryside, reducing its remaining shareholding to approximately 23 per cent of the Company’s issued share capital. As a consequence, James Financial statements Van Steenkiste stepped down from the Board on 5 June 2017 as per the Relationship Agreement between Oaktree and the Company. Additionally, on 2 October 2017, Richard Adam announced his intention to step down as a Non-Executive Director of the Company, with his last day of service being 31 December 2017. Countryside has delivered another Our position going into the next financial year is strong. Our year-end private forward order On behalf of the Board, I would like to thank year of significant progress completing book is at a record level at £242.4m, which, both James and Richard for their significant 3,389 homes while maintaining a combined with a strong pipeline in both contributions to the Board and its Committees divisions, positions us well to achieve our since joining Countryside. The whole Board strong balance sheet and with ambitious growth plans. wishes them both well for the future. A search excellent visibility over our future for Richard’s successor is well under way and growth ambitions. Returns to shareholders an announcement of the appointment will be Our share price performed well over the course made in due course. Well positioned for growth of the financial year, reflecting the performance of the business along with continued investor Our people During 2017 the business continued to perform education. In the year to 30 September 2017, We recognise that our people are the well, delivering on the key targets set out at we delivered a total shareholder return of most important factor in delivering on our our initial public offering (“IPO”) in February 46.6 per cent compared to 13.5 per cent for ambitious growth plans and we continue to 2016. Political support for the housebuilding the FTSE 250 (excluding Investment Trusts). invest in developing them at all levels. As at industry remains strong and we welcome the 30 September 2017 we had over 1,200 employees, With the growth in earnings, our proposed dividend Government’s commitment to housing with 12 per cent more than a year ago. We are per share has also increased by 147 per cent the white paper “Fixing our broken housing recruiting more apprentices, graduates and with a recommended final dividend per share market” and subsequently announced increased trainees than ever before. In addition, we have of 5.0 pence. Subject to approval at the AGM funding for both affordable housing and the placed great focus on succession planning at all on 25 January 2018, the dividend will be paid Help to Buy scheme.
Recommended publications
  • COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update

    COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update

    COVID-19 Proxy Governance Update 2020 AGM mid-season review FROM EQUINITI 01 Looking back and planning ahead It is incredible to note that it has been over 12 weeks since the official announcement on 23 March of the UK Government’s Stay at Home Measures, and nearly seven months since the severity of the pandemic became apparent in China. Over the said period, PLC boards, company secretaries and investor relations officers have kept their corporate calendars going thanks to rapid adoption of modified regulatory guidelines and inventive modes of engagement with investors. With annual general meetings being an obvious highlight in the corporate calendar, we take stock of the progress made so far over the 2020 AGM season, as well as using what we learned to plan ahead. Now that we are over the first ‘hump’ with the busy period of May AGMs out of the way, we are readying for the second ‘peak’ of June and July AGMs, and then an ‘easing’ until the second ‘mini’ season in the early autumn. As such, in this update, we look at: • 2020 AGM season statistics…so far • Proxy adviser engagement and ISS recommendations review • High-level assumptions for Q3 and Q4 • Relevant updates from the regulators, industry bodies and proxy advisers • Communications in the COVID-19 world – special commentary by leading financial PR firm,Camarco • How has COVID-19 impacted activism – special commentary by international law firm,White & Case 02 2020 AGM Season Statistics…so far Scope of data To assess progress and forecast what is to come, we look at the key statistics for the UK AGM season 2020 thus far.
  • Taylor Woodrow Plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our Aim Is to Be the Homebuilder of Choice

    Taylor Woodrow Plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our Aim Is to Be the Homebuilder of Choice

    Taylor Woodrow plc Report and Accounts 2006 Our aim is to be the homebuilder of choice. Our primary business is the development of sustainable communities of high-quality homes in selected markets in the UK, North America, Spain and Gibraltar. We seek to add shareholder value through the achievement of profitable growth and effective capital management. Contents 01 Group Financial Highlights 54 Consolidated Cash Flow 02 Chairman’s Statement Statement 05 Chief Executive’s Review 55 Notes to the Consolidated 28 Board of Directors Financial Statements 30 Report of the Directors 79 Independent Auditors’ Report 33 Corporate Governance Statement 80 Accounting Policies 37 Directors’ Remuneration Report 81 Company Balance Sheet 46 Directors’ Responsibilities 82 Notes to the Company Financial Statement Statements 47 Independent Auditors’ Report 87 Particulars of Principal Subsidiary 48 Accounting Policies Undertakings 51 Consolidated Income Statement 88 Five Year Review 52 Consolidated Statement of 90 Shareholder Facilities Recognised Income and Expense 92 Principal Taylor Woodrow Offices 53 Consolidated Balance Sheet Group Financial Highlights • Group revenues £3.68bn (2005: £3.56bn) • Housing profit from operations* £469m (2005: £456m) • Profit before tax £406m (2005: £411m) • Basic earnings per share 50.5 pence (2005: 50.6 pence) • Full year dividend 14.75 pence (2005: 13.4 pence) • Net gearing 18.6 per cent (2005: 23.7 per cent) • Equity shareholders’ funds per share 364.7 pence (2005: 338.4 pence) Profit before tax £m 2006 405.6 2005 411.0 2004 403.9 Full year dividend pence (Represents interim dividends declared and paid and final dividend for the year as declared by the Board) 2006 14.75 2005 13.4 2004 11.1 Equity shareholders’ funds per share pence 2006 364.7 2005 338.4 2004 303.8 * Profit from operations is before joint ventures’ interest and tax (see Note 3, page 56).
  • City-REDI Policy Briefing Series

    City-REDI Policy Briefing Series

    City-REDI Policy Briefing Series March Image Image 2018 Part B Carillion’s Collapse: Consequences Dr Amir Qamar & Professor Simon Collinson Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, were proud of their commitment to support regional growth and small-scale suppliers. As part of this commitment they directed 60% of project expenditure to local economies. Following the collapse of the firm, this positive multiplier effect became a significant, negative multiplier effect, particularly damaging to small-scale suppliers in the construction industry. The aim of this policy brief is to examine the consequences of Carillion’s demise, many of which are only now surfacing. One of the fundamental lessons that we can learn from Carillion’s collapse is about these ‘contagion’ effects. As we saw in the 2008 financial crisis, the businesses that underpin the economic health of the country are connected and strongly co-dependent. When a large flagship firm falls it brings down others. This does not mean we need more state intervention. But it does mean we need more intelligent state intervention. One of the fundamental lessons that the Government can learn from the Carillion episode is that it has a significant responsibility as a key customer, using public sector funds for public sector projects, to monitor the health of firms and assess the risks prior to issuing PPI and other contracts. 1 Introduction The collapse of Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, has had a significant, negative knock-on effect, particularly on small-scale suppliers in the industry. In total, Carillion was comprised of 326 subsidiaries, of which 199 were in the UK.
  • Consultation Statement

    Consultation Statement

    Maidstone Borough Council Affordable and Local Needs Housing Supplementary Planning Document Consultation Statement 21st August 2019 1 Maidstone Borough Council - Consultation Statement 1.1 Maidstone Borough Council (MBC) has recently adopted its Local Plan (October 2017) and this includes a commitment to produce an Affordable and Local Needs Housing Supplementary Planning Document (the SPD). 1.2 Adams Integra have been instructed to compile an SPD which is intended to facilitate negotiations and provide certainty for landowners, lenders, housebuilders and Registered Providers regarding MBC’s expectations for affordable and local needs housing provision in specific schemes. 1.3 The purpose of this Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) is to provide advice on how the Council’s Local Plan housing policies are to be implemented. 1.4 In order to facilitate the preparation of the SPD we (Adams Integra) consulted with the following persons and organisations: David Banfield Redrow Homes Barry Chamberlain Wealden Homes Tim Daniels Millwood Designer Homes Paul Dawson Fernham Homes Rosa Etherington Countryside Properties PLC Chris Lilley Redrow Homes Chris Loughead Crest Nicholson Iain McPherson Countryside Properties PLC Stuart Mitchell Chartway Group Chris Moore Bellway Guy Osborne Country House Developments Kathy Putnam Chartway Group James Stevens Home Builders Federation Julian Wilkinson BDW Homes Kerry Kyriacou Optivo Adetokunbo Adeyeloja Golding Homes Sarah Paxton Maidstone Housing Trust Joe Scullion Gravesend Churches Housing Association Gareth Crawford Homes Group Mike Finch Hyde HA Russell Drury Moat HA Keiran O'Leary Orbit HA Chris Cheesman Clarion Housing Micheal Neeh Sanctuary HA Colin Lissenden Town and Country West Kent HA Guy Osbourne Country House Homes Katherine Putnam Chartway Group Annabel McKie Golding Homes Councillors at Maidstone Maidstone Borough Council Borough Council 2 Maidstone Borough Council - Consultation Statement 1.5 We sent out separate questionnaires to Housing Associations and Developers which have been appended to this statement.
  • Parker Review

    Parker Review

    Ethnic Diversity Enriching Business Leadership An update report from The Parker Review Sir John Parker The Parker Review Committee 5 February 2020 Principal Sponsor Members of the Steering Committee Chair: Sir John Parker GBE, FREng Co-Chair: David Tyler Contents Members: Dr Doyin Atewologun Sanjay Bhandari Helen Mahy CBE Foreword by Sir John Parker 2 Sir Kenneth Olisa OBE Foreword by the Secretary of State 6 Trevor Phillips OBE Message from EY 8 Tom Shropshire Vision and Mission Statement 10 Yvonne Thompson CBE Professor Susan Vinnicombe CBE Current Profile of FTSE 350 Boards 14 Matthew Percival FRC/Cranfield Research on Ethnic Diversity Reporting 36 Arun Batra OBE Parker Review Recommendations 58 Bilal Raja Kirstie Wright Company Success Stories 62 Closing Word from Sir Jon Thompson 65 Observers Biographies 66 Sanu de Lima, Itiola Durojaiye, Katie Leinweber Appendix — The Directors’ Resource Toolkit 72 Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Thanks to our contributors during the year and to this report Oliver Cover Alex Diggins Neil Golborne Orla Pettigrew Sonam Patel Zaheer Ahmad MBE Rachel Sadka Simon Feeke Key advisors and contributors to this report: Simon Manterfield Dr Manjari Prashar Dr Fatima Tresh Latika Shah ® At the heart of our success lies the performance 2. Recognising the changes and growing talent of our many great companies, many of them listed pool of ethnically diverse candidates in our in the FTSE 100 and FTSE 250. There is no doubt home and overseas markets which will influence that one reason we have been able to punch recruitment patterns for years to come above our weight as a medium-sized country is the talent and inventiveness of our business leaders Whilst we have made great strides in bringing and our skilled people.
  • Crr 412/2002

    Crr 412/2002

    HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management Prepared by Risk Solutions for the Health and Safety Executive CONTRACT RESEARCH REPORT 412/2002 HSE Health & Safety Executive A survey of UK approaches to sharing good practice in health and safety risk management E Baker Risk Solutions 1st floor, Central House 14 Upper Woburn Place London, WC1H 0JN United Kingdom The concept of good practice is central to HSE’s approach to regulation of health and safety management. There must therefore be a common understanding of what good practice is and where it can be found. A survey was conducted to explore how industry actually identifies good practice in health and safety management, decides how to adopt it, and how this is communicated with others. The findings are based primarily on a segmentation of the survey results by organisation size, due to homogeneity of the returns along other axes of analysis. A key finding is that there is no common understanding of the term good practice or how this is distinguished from best practice. Regulatory interpretation of good practice is perceived to be inconsistent. Three models were identified: A) Large organisations, primarily in privatised industries, have effective Trade Associations where good practice is developed and guidance disseminated industry-wide. B) Large and medium-sized organisations in competitive industries have ineffective trade associations. They develop good practices in-house and may only share these with their competitors when forced to do so. C) Small organisations have little contact with their competitors.
  • Annual Report 2015 Report Annual Plc Lakehouse

    Annual Report 2015 Report Annual Plc Lakehouse

    Lakehouse plc Annual Report 2015 Annual Report 2015 The Lakehouse Way Who Lakehouse is an asset and energy support we are services group, focused on customers and their communities. We make a difference to people’s lives by constructing, improving, maintaining and providing services to homes, schools, public and commercial buildings. Lakehouse was founded in 1988 and we have grown consistently since, achieving revenue of £340.2m in 2014/15. With our headquarters in Romford, Essex, we employ more than 2,400 people through 35 offices across the UK. Lakehouse listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange in March 2015. Strategic Report Governance Overview 43 Executive Chairman’s introduction IFC Who we are to Corporate Governance Why invest in Lakehouse? 44 Board of Directors About Lakehouse 46 Corporate Governance Report 01 Our manifesto 56 Directors’ Remuneration Report 01 Financial highlights 69 Directors’ Report 02 The Lakehouse Way 71 Directors’ responsibilities Strategic review Financial statements E 12 xecutive Chairman’s Statement 72 Independent Auditor’s Report to I 14 nterview with Sean Birrane, CEO the members of Lakehouse plc 17 Company snapshot 77 Consolidated statement of M 18 arket overview comprehensive income B 20 usiness model 78 Consolidated statement of O 22 ur strategy financial position K 24 ey performance indicators 79 Consolidated statement of changes C 26 hief Executive Officers’ in equity Divisional review 80 Consolidated statement of cash flows 30 Principal risks and uncertainties 81 Notes to the consolidated
  • Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted

    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in Planning up to Detailed Plans Submitted

    Contract Leads Powered by EARLY PLANNING Projects in planning up to detailed plans submitted. PLANS APPROVED Projects where the detailed plans have been approved but are still at pre-tender stage. TENDERS Projects that are at the tender stage CONTRACTS Approved projects at main contract awarded stage. NORTHAMPTON £3.7M CHESTERFIELD £1M Detail Plans Granted for 2 luxury houses The Coppice Primary School, 50 County Council Agent: A A Design Ltd, GRIMSBY £1M Studios, Trafalgar Street, Newcastle-Upon- Land Off, Alibone Close Moulton Recreation Ground, North Side New Client: Michael Howard Homes Developer: Shawhurst Lane Hollywood £1.7m Aizlewood Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, Grimsby Leisure Centre, Cromwell Road Tyne, Tyne & Wear, NE1 2LA Tel: 0191 2611258 MIDLANDS/ Planning authority: Daventry Job: Outline Tupton Bullworthy Shallish LLP, 3 Quayside Place, Planning authority: Bromsgrove Job: Detail S8 0YX Contractor: William Davis Ltd, Forest Planning authority: North East Lincolnshire Plans Granted for 16 elderly person Planning authority: North East Derbyshire Quayside, Woodbridge, Suffolk, IP12 1FA Tel: Plans Granted for school (extension) Client: Field, Forest Road, Loughborough, Job: Detailed Plans Submitted for leisure Plans Approved EAST ANGLIA bungalows Client: Gayton Retirement Fund Job: Detail Plans Granted for 4 changing 01394 384 736 The Coppice Primary School Agent: PR Leicestershire, LE11 3NS Tel: 01509 231181 centre Client: North East Lincolnshire BILLINGHAM £0.57M & Beechwood Trusteeship & Administration rooms pavilion
  • Building Excellence

    Building Excellence

    Barratt Developments PLC Building excellence Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Annual Report and Accounts 2017 Inside this report 1 45 113 175 Strategic Report Governance Financial Statements Other Information 1 Key highlights 46 The Board 114 Independent Auditor’s Report 175 KPI definitions and why we measure 2 A snapshot of our business 48 Corporate governance report 119 Consolidated Income Statement 176 Glossary 4 Our performance and financial highlights 60 Nomination Committee report 119 Statement of Comprehensive Income 177 Other Information 6 How we create and preserve value 65 Audit Committee report 120 Statement of Changes in 8 Chairman’s statement 74 Safety, Health and Environment Shareholders’ Equity – Group 10 Key aspects of our market Committee report 121 Statement of Changes in 76 Remuneration report Shareholders’ Equity – Company 12 Chief Executive’s statement Notice regarding limitations on Directors’ liability under 106 Other statutory disclosures 122 Balance Sheets English law 17 Our Strategic priorities Under the Companies Act 2006, a safe harbour limits the 112 Statement of Directors’ 123 Cash Flow Statements liability of Directors in respect of statements in, and omissions from, the Strategic Report contained on pages 1 to 44 and the Our principles Responsibilities 124 Notes to the Financial Statements Directors’ Report contained on pages 45 to 112. Under English Law the Directors would be liable to the Company (but not to 34 Keeping people safe any third party) if the Strategic Report and/or the Directors’ Report contains errors as a result of recklessness or knowing 35 Being a trusted partner misstatement or dishonest concealment of a material fact, 36 Building strong but would not otherwise be liable.
  • Organisations/Groups on the Consultation Database Planning

    Organisations/Groups on the Consultation Database Planning

    Appendix B Organisations/Groups on the Consultation Database Planning Agents/Professional Representatives 3Fox International Limited Acorn, Land & Strategic Property Division Acorus Admiral Homes Affinity Sutton Homes Alliance Planning AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Annington Developments Ltd Appledore Developments Ltd Artesian Asprey Homes Axes Lane Banner Homes Barton Willmore Planning Partnership Batcheller Monkhouse Baxter Phillips Bell Cornwell Bellway Homes Ltd Bellway Homes Ltd, Thames Gateway South Division Berkeley Homes (South East London) Berwood Homes Bidwells LLP Bioscan (UK) Ltd BNP Paribas Real Estate Boyer Planning Limited bptw Partnership BRE Brian Barber Associates British Land Company PLC Broadlands Planning Broadway Malyan Planning Burnett Planning & Development Limited Cala Homes Calfordseaden LLP Capita Symonds Castlefort Properties Ltd Cathedral Group CBRE Ltd CgMs Consulting Chart Plan (2004) Limited Chase & Partners Clifford Rance Associates Cluttons LLP Colliers International Conrad Phoenix Properties Ltd Correct as of 21/07/2016 Conrad Ritblat Erdman Co-Operative Group Ltd., Countryside Strategic Projects plc Cranbrook Home Extensions Crest Nicholson Eastern Crest Strategic Projectsl Ltd Croudace D & M Planning Daniel Watney LLP Deloitte Real Estate DHA Planning Direct Build Services Limited DLA Town Planning Ltd dp9 DPDS Consulting Group Drivers Jonas Deloitte Dron & Wright DTZ Edwards Covell Architecture & Planning Fairclough Homes Fairview Estates (Housing) Ltd Firstplan FirstPlus Planning Limited
  • 49 P51 AO1 Hot Noms.Qxp 04/12/2007 17:23 Page 51

    49 P51 AO1 Hot Noms.Qxp 04/12/2007 17:23 Page 51

    49 p51 AO1 Hot noms.qxp 04/12/2007 17:23 Page 51 www.propertyweek.com Analysis + opinion – Hot 100 51 07.12.07 ROLL OF HONOUR The following 527 rising stars were all nominated by readers, but did not receive enough votes to make it on to the Hot 100 list. However, we have decided to publish all of their names to recognise and reward their individual achievements Ab Shome, RBS Caroline McDade, Drivers Jonas Douglas Higgins Ian Webster, Colliers CRE Adam Buchler, Buchler Barnett Celine Donnet, Cohen & Steers Duncan Walker, Helical Bar Ian Webster, Savills Adam Oliver, Coleman Bennett Charles Archer, Colliers CRE Edward Offenbach, DTZ James Abrahms, Allsop Adam Poyner, Colliers CRE Charles Bull, DTZ Corporate Finance Edward Siddall-Jones, Nattrass Giles James Ackroyd, Colliers CRE Adam Robson, Drivers Jonas Charles Ferguson Davie, Moorfield Group Edward Towers James Bain, Mollison Adam Varley, Lambert Smith Hampton Charles Kearney, Gerry O’Connor Elizabeth Higgins, Drivers Jonas James Baker, Nice Investments Adam Winton, Kaupthing Estate Agents Elliot Robertson, Manorlane James Cobbold, Colliers CRE Agnes Peters, Drivers Jonas Charlie Archer, Colliers CRE Emilia Keladitis, DTZ Corporate Finance James Ebel, Harper Dennis Hobbs Akhtar Alibhai, Colliers CRE Charlie Barke, Cushman & Wakefield Emma Crowley, Jones Lang LaSalle James Feilden, GVA Grimley Alan Gardener, Jones Lang LaSalle Charlie Bezzant, Reed Smith Richards Butler Emma Wilson, Urban Splash James Goymour, Edward Symmons Alan Hegarty, Bennett Property Charlote Fourmont, Drivers Jonas
  • Yorbuild2 East Area Framework – List of Unsuccessful Candidates at ITT Lot 1 0-£250K

    Yorbuild2 East Area Framework – List of Unsuccessful Candidates at ITT Lot 1 0-£250K

    YORbuild2 East Area Framework – list of unsuccessful candidates at ITT Lot 1 0-£250k Applicant T H Michaels (Construction) Ltd Evora Construction Limited Britcon Limited George Hurst & Sons Ltd FMe Property Solutions Ltd The Soper Group Ltd Transcore Limited J C Services & Son Ltd Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd Stubbs Brothers Building Services Limited Unico Construction Limited Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 2 over £250k-£1m Applicant S Voase Builders Limited F Parkinson Ltd Britcon Limited RN Wooler & Co Ltd Illingworth & Gregory Ltd George Hurst & Sons Ltd T H Michaels (Construction) Ltd Transcore Limited PBS Construction Elliott Group Northern Construction Solutions Ltd Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 3 over £1m-£4m Applicant Wildgoose Construction ltd Esh Construction Limited Morgan Sindall George Hurst & Sons Ltd Britcon Limited Hall Construction Group Caddick Construction Limited Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd F Parkinson Ltd Gentoo Tolent GMI Construction Group PLC United Living Lot 4 over £4m-£10m Applicant Conlon Construction Limited Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd Keepmoat Regeneration Limited Henry Boot Construction Limited Morgan Sindall Hobson and Porter Ltd Robertson Construction Group Ltd Eric Wright Group VINCI Construction UK Limited G F Tomlinson Group Limited Sewell Group Britcon Limited Lot 5 over £10m Applicant Henry Boot Construction Limited Bowmer & Kirkland Ltd John Graham Construction Ltd Morgan Sindall McLaughlin & Harvey (formally Barr Construction Ltd) Eric Wright Group VINCI Construction UK Limited Robertson Construction Group Ltd Caddick Construction Limited J F Finnegan Limited Shepherd Construction Lot 6 New housing up to 10 units Applicant GEDA Construction Lindum Group Limited Woodhouse-Barry (Construction) Ltd Lot 7 New housing over 10 units Applicant Gentoo Tolent Herbert T Forrest Ltd Lindum Group Limited Termrim Construction Strategic Team Maintenance Co Ltd GEDA Construction .