Costs Product.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Costs Product.Indd BC BC LEGAL B R I N G I N G C L A R I T Y BC LEGAL DISEASE COSTS MARCH 2016 BC LEGAL COSTS REPUDIATION RATE A SNAPSHOT UP TO 94% PRE LITIGATION 60-70% IN LITIGATION CLAIMANT BUDGET REDUCTIONS DATA COLLECTING 30-40% AND PROFILING PART 36 OFFERS COSTS APP ONCE AND ONCE ONLY! AVERAGE SAVING 44% PER BILL OF COSTS If you have any questions about the BC Legal Cost Team and Services please contact Gary Brankin on DD: 0113 323 0462 or [email protected]. 6 OPPORTUNITIES TO OUR ETHOS LOWER CLIENT’S INDEMNITY SPEND x Repudiation rates in Occupational Disease 1. Increase your repudiation rate. claims are typically higher than for other types of personal injury claims. Ours are 2. Cost Budgets- Reduce Claimants’ cost between 60-70% in litigation and up to 94% entitlement at the first opportunity. pre-litigation. 3. Create risk to agree damages and costs x If high repudiation rates can be maintained together. and Claimant solicitors’ costs limited, there is 4. Reduce the amount paid in costs. no business model for these claims. 5. Reduce unnecessary leakage into litigation. x High repudiation rates mean Claimant 6. Pay appropriate claims at the appropriate solicitors have to ‘over recover’ on those settlements at the earliest stage. claims in which they do receive payment. x Our BCL Costs Product aims to robustly attack the costs claimed by Claimant solicitors and Repudiation rate reduce the sums payable with limited risk to the insurer. x Our pre-litigation repudiation rate across varying disease types for one major client is x Under QOCS, costs cannot be recovered from the Claimant if the claim is won in based on significant volumes and litigation. However costs can be recovered 94% from a Claimant where Part 36 offers are not mature 3 year data. beaten. x Our litigated repudiation rate varies between x We aim to get our Part 36 offer right, and help your own claims teams get their offers 60-70% depending on the profile right, ensure payment to the Claimant’s of the individual clients. solicitor early to limit the exposure to interest and encourage the Judiciary to fully scrutinise Claimant’s certified bills of costs. Create risk to agree damages and x Never has there been so much pressure on costs together the Judiciary to limit Claimant costs. We aim to take advantage of this beneficial climate. x Where our disease team cannot win the case they have sufficient specialism to create risk x Our costs product is disease focused but is that we can control damages and costs and also designed to specifically tackle costs in have the litigation risk reflected in the overall volume NIHL claims. settlement. x Costs proceedings will be handled by an experienced occupational disease Cost Budgets- Reduce Claimants’ solicitor/costs draftsman who is able to demonstrate to the Court how straightforward costs entitlement at first opportunity issues such as apportionment and limitation can be-often to a Judge who may never x BC Legal sees this as a major opportunity to have undertaken costs assessment in an reduce client spend. Occupational Disease claim before. x This is an opportunity we get on every file and we have developed our cost team to allow us to target Claimants’ budgets and increase reductions at the initial Costs Hearing. x Our costs team work closely with our disease handlers and advocates to ensure all costs points are made in detailed submissions and market leading reductions are achieved. Page 3 x BC Legal has been approved by the Bar x We use data and market intelligence to take Standards Council to offer pupillages and we technical points on miscertification of Bill, are developing a team of disease and cost challenge ATE premiums and assess the best specific advocates to target Cost Budgets. offer to make an individual firm. x Once the Budget is Court approved, the x These technical points will be taken with the Claimant is limited to incurring those sums at security of cost protective Part 36 offers in each phase of the litigation. place. x Cost Budget reductions allow us not only to better reserve for Claimant costs, but also to New Procedure make an earlier Part 36 offer on costs when damages are concluded. Bill of Costs served x If we settle at Witness Evidence Stage we know the approved amounts up to that phase, we apply appropriate hourly rates Short POD’s filed together and likely discounts on time incurred prior to with an open offer Cost Budgeting and we can formulate our offer. Replies to Points of Dispute (if any) x Currently our average budget reduction is served between 1.5 hour paper Assessment by Distrct 30-40%. Judge. No Advocates x Our savings on Provisional Assessment in percentage terms will fall, as there is less of Either side can request an oral hear- the Bill to attack on conclusion of the claim. ing but must achieve a 20% swing in However our average spend on Claimant costs overall will lower. x No longer can you rely on an Advocate at a hearing to rescue poor Points of Dispute. PART 8 x You need to get an early Part 36 offer right. COSTS LITIGATION Two reasons why an early Part 36 offer is the right strategy? Interest Our approach x Interest on costs accrues at 8% per annum. x BC Legal see costs law as a true specialism Sum Interest at 8% over a 12 month and have recruited Association of Costs Recovered period when no interim paid Lawyers, experienced Legal Executives with a £15,000 £1,200 costs specialism and work closely with external Costs Counsel to develop our £20,000 £1,600 offering in this area. £25,000 £2,000 x We do not believe in “drip feeding” offers or £30,000 £2,400 interim payments. £35,000 £2,800 x Our aim is to make an early Part 36 offer £40,000 £3,200 which offers costs protection so we can take a position of control in costs proceedings. £45,000 £3,600 x We aim to make an early Part 36 offer, £50,000 £4,000 tender that sum to the Claimants’ Solicitors and if not accepted robustly defend to x With NIHL repudiation rates at 70-80%, such Provisional Assessment/ Oral Hearing or easy money for Claimants allows them to Detailed Assessment. continue to take NIHL work. Page 4 x Early payment allows them to recover the BC Legal Costs App-In right sum, not the right sum, plus some additional free cash that they have not Development earned. x We are developing the BC Legal Costs App x Costs Lawyer fees accessed Online via our Knowledge Centre to skill your Claims Team to pitch your Part 36 x On pre-QOCS cases Costs Lawyers can offers correctly. recover hourly rates plus 62.5/100% success fee. x Without a strong Part 36 offer there is no risk on the Claimant to allow us to control these costs. x Without a strong Part 36 offer, Costs Lawyers are free to work at £294 p/h and each 3.5 hours of work adds £1,000 to the insurer’s Bill. Why do we get our Part 36 offers right? x Consistent with our intention to be the best in the market place with lowest market cost, we only want to work with genuine costs experts. x Select the appropriate Grade Fee earner x Each Part 8 case we take we will make a Part and Court Banding from our drop down 36 offer in line with Margaret McDonald’s options, linked to SCCO Guidelines for advice. This advice is provided at low fixed Summary Assessment. cost and our Points of Dispute will correspond x Complete the data fields for the time to her calculations. claimed by the Claimants’ Solicitors. x Reduce the number of letters and disbursements to a level you feel appropriate. x Estimate the likely % saving on document time. x Use our Apportionment Tool App to calculate your contribution to Costs, if not already agreed. x Our App will then calculate an appropriate offer, taking into account VAT and Disbursements and generate a Part 36 Top Ranked by Chambers & Partners 2013: precedent letter, which we have agreed with Counsel, designed to give maximum costs protection. You can adjust the % reduction “Margaret McDonald is the Head of the Costs & as you see fit. Civil Team at Kenworthy’s Chambers and has a x We will work with your Claims Team to use the busy practice in both Costs and Personal data captured via our online tool on % Injury. Able to draw on her well regarded saving, to allow you to make informed personal injury practice, she proves “a really decisions about the % reduction that can be feisty opponent” when it comes to costs work, made and refine Part 36 offers being made and is particularly noted for her prowess in to certain firms and fee earners. fact-heavy cases.” x If we can help you to get your Claims Team making Part 36 offers which offer costs protection, then the claim will come to us with cost protection and allow us to really apply pressure in proceedings. Page 5 Data collection x In addition we will collate data from all files we receive across a wide variety of data fields. x This data will be anonymised and accessible to all clients to assist Claims Team making appropriate Part 8 offers. Data on specific Claimant firms x We work in identifying the key players in the volume NIHL market and targeting their costs.
Recommended publications
  • Career Options with Your LLM
    Career Options with your LLM Introduction Every student will have individual reasons for undertaking the LLM qualification. These may include enhancing or broadening career opportunities or adding value and depth to their CV. This leaflet aims to outline the main job opportunities open to LLM students, provide information on how to research opportunities and signpost further support. What skills does an LLM develop? As well as intellectual skills and professional expertise in a specialist area of law (e.g. Maritime, International Commercial Law) the LLM course also enables you to develop a range of transferable skills which are useful in whatever career path you choose to pursue. These include legal research and writing, analysis, critical evaluation and logical thinking as well as written and verbal communication. What types of careers can LLM graduates consider? UK Legal Market As every student has a different background and experience there is no single route to qualifying or working in the UK legal market. You will have to research the routes available and determine which of these is relevant and appropriate for you. Solicitor Qualifying as a solicitor currently requires completing a Legal Practice Course (LPC) followed by a two-year Training Contract. Depending on your previous experience and qualifications, you may have to complete a conversion course known as a Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) before undertaking the LPC. However, you should note that the GDL and LPC will be replaced by a super-exam, the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE), due to be introduced in 2020. The SQE will introduce a more flexible approach to work-based experience and will no longer require students to sign up for the GDL or LPC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): an Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2003 The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Terrance Gerard Galvin University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Architecture Commons, European History Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Galvin, Terrance Gerard, "The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment" (2003). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 996. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Abstract In examining select works of English architects Joseph Michael Gandy and Sir John Soane, this dissertation is intended to bring to light several important parallels between architectural theory and freemasonry during the late Enlightenment. Both architects developed architectural theories regarding the universal origins of architecture in an attempt to establish order as well as transcend the emerging historicism of the early nineteenth century. There are strong parallels between Soane's use of architectural narrative and his discussion of architectural 'model' in relation to Gandy's understanding of 'trans-historical' architecture. The primary textual sources discussed in this thesis include Soane's Lectures on Architecture, delivered at the Royal Academy from 1809 to 1836, and Gandy's unpublished treatise entitled the Art, Philosophy, and Science of Architecture, circa 1826.
    [Show full text]
  • Sanctions 2020 a Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Sanctions Law
    International Comparative Legal Guides Sanctions 2020 A practical cross-border insight into sanctions law First Edition Featuring contributions from: Allen & Gledhill LLP DORDA Rechtsanwälte GmbH Miller & Chevalier BonelliErede Esenyel & Partners MinterEllison Bonifassi Avocats Eversheds Sutherland Navigant Consulting, Inc. BSA Ahmad Bin Hezeem & Associates Hill Dickinson LLP Nishimura & Asahi LLP Homburger Noerr LLP De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek N.V. JSA Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & DELTA legal JunHe Law Offices Garrison LLP Dentons US LLP Kluge Plesner Djingov, Gouginski, Kyutchukov & Lee & Ko Proskauer Rose LLP Velichkov Linklaters LLP Stikeman Elliott LLP ICLG.com ISBN 978-1-83918-003-3 ISSN 2633-1365 Sanctions 2020 Published by First Edition glg global legal group 59 Tanner Street London SE1 3PL United Kingdom +44 207 367 0720 Contributing Editors: www.iclg.com Roberto J. Gonzalez & Rachel M. Fiorill Group Publisher Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP Rory Smith Publisher Jon Martin Senior Editors Caroline Oakley Rachel Williams Sub-Editor Amy Norton Creative Director Fraser Allan Printed by Stephens & George Print Group Cover Image www.istockphoto.com Strategic Partners ©2019 Global Legal Group Limited. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction by any means, PEFC Certified digital or analogue, in whole or in part, is strictly forbidden. This product is from sustainably managed forests and controlled sources PEFC/16-33-254 www.pefc.org Disclaimer This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillingdon Primary Care Trust
    Access to Legal Advice Policy To be read in conjunction with Risk Management Strategy/Policy Claims Policy Version Control Record Version Description of Reason for Change Author Date Change(s) 1.0 New Policy for CCG Keith Dickinson 28 April 2013 Page 1 of 15 Contents Section CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 3 2 SCOPE 3 3 BACKGROUND 3 4 OBTAINING ADVICE 3 4.1. Authorised Persons 3 4.2 All Staff 3 4.3 When Advice Might Be Required 3 4.4 Internal Support and Expertise 4 4.6 External Professional Advice 4 4.7 Procedure to Access Legal Advice 4 4.8 Urgent Requests 4 4.9 Procedure for Instructing Solicitors 4 4.10 Payment for Legal Advice 5 5 IMPLEMENTATION 5 5.1 Ratification 5 5.2 Dissemination 5 5.3 Training 5 5.4 Audit 5 6 DUTIES AND REPSONSIBILITIES 5 6.1 Directors 5 6.2 Head of Governance 5 6.3 Authorised Persons 6 6.4 All Staff 6 Appendix A Request for Authorisation to Seek Legal Advice 7 Appendix B Internal Sources of Advice 9 Appendix C Contact details for Approved Law Firms 11 Appendix D Access To Legal Advice – Flowchart 13 Appendix E Equalities Impact Assessment 14 Page 2 of 15 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document sets out the CCGs approach to ensuring that legal advice is obtained from the best and most economical sources. This includes identifying and providing access to internal and external experts, ensuring there is no unnecessary recourse to costly legal advice where the appropriate information or expertise exists within the CCG.
    [Show full text]
  • International Arbitration 2007
    The International Comparative Legal Guide to: International Arbitration 2007 A practical insight to cross-border International Arbitration work Published by Global Legal Group with contributions from: Advokaterne Amaliegade No 42 Foigt and Partners / Regija Borenius Miranda & Amado Abogados Alban Tay Mahtani & de Silva Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Molina & Asociados Central Law Aluko & Oyebode Ghellal & Mekerba Morais Leitão, Galvão Teles, Soares da Silva Arsov Natchev Ganeva Gilbert Walker & Associados Attride-Stirling & Woloniecki Guevara & Gutierrez S.C. Servicios Legales Nishimura & Partners Baier Boehm Haavind Vislie O'Melveny & Myers LLP Basham, Ringe y Correa Pachiu & Associates Benedetti & Benedetti Central Law Hill Dickinson LLP Homburger Posse Herrera & Ruiz BKBG Sociedade de Advogados Quirós & Asociados Central Law Johnson Stokes & Master Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP Raidla & Partners Kachwaha & Partners Brick Court Chambers Roschier, Attorneys Ltd. Bustamante & Bustamante Kojovic Law Office Rusconi, Valdez, Medina & Asociados Central Carey y Cía. Ltda. Kyriakides - Georgopoulos & Daniolos - Law Clayton Utz Issaias Law Firm S. Horowitz & Co. Clifford Chance LLP Lee & Ko Shalakany Law Office CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Lejins, Torgans & Partners Cuatrecasas Abogados SJ Berwin LLP Lombardi Molinari e Associati Stibbe Dechert LLP Magister & Partners Díaz-Durán & Asociados Central Law Vinge Matheson Ormsby Prentice Elvinger, Hoss & Prussen Werksmans Estudio Alegria, Buey Fernández, Fissore & Medina, Rosenthal & Fernández Central Law WilmerHale Montemerlo Mehmet Gün & Partners Winston & Strawn LLP www.ICLG.co.uk Chapter 60 Regional Overview: North America Kenneth D. Beale WilmerHale D. Jason File Bermuda consolidate or stay multiple arbitration proceedings. Canada has also ratified the New York Convention without any Arbitration agreements in Bermuda, a self-governing territory of reservations, implementing it through the United Nations Foreign the United Kingdom, are governed by two different statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Disease Team
    OUR DISEASE TEAM OUR OFFICES Southend on Sea Address: 1 Nelson Mews, Southend on Sea, Essex SS1 1AL Tel: 01702 568 710 | Fax: 01702 667 961 Leeds Address: 40 Park Square North, Leeds LS1 2NP Tel: 0113 323 0460 | Fax: 01702 667 961 Ipswich Address: Second Floor, Fraser House, Museum Street, Ipswich IP1 1HN Tel: 01473 351 692 | Fax: 01702 667 961 Birmingham Address: Grosvenor House, 14 Bennetts Hill, Birmingham B2 5RS Tel: 0121 796 5280 | Fax: 01702 667 961 Cardiff – opening January 2016 Boris was a senior equity partner at Berrymans Lace Charlotte was an associate solicitor at BLM before she left Mawer LLP (BLM), a national defendant law practice, to establish BC Legal. She trained at Barlow Robbins before he left in November 2012 to establish BC Legal. Solicitors in Guildford and qualified into their clinical negligence team in 2004. Boris qualified as a solicitor and joined BLM in October 1998. He was made a partner in BLM’s London She joined BLM’s London occupational disease team in occupational disease team in 2000 and jointly headed the February 2005 and was promoted to associate in October team for 12 years. 2010. Charlotte was responsible for managing a noise induced hearing loss team of solicitors/paralegal and Boris has specialised exclusively in occupational disease developing innovative defence strategies. claims throughout his 16 year career and has handled hundreds of such claims for a variety of insurer, corporate, Charlotte specialises exclusively in occupational disease local authority, NHS Trust and defendant clients. litigation and handles a considerable number of claims relating to many different diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest Commercial Law Firms in the UK Ranked by Revenue
    UK Top 50 2018-19 The largest commercial law firms in the UK ranked by revenue Rank Rank Revenue Change in Average PEP Change Total Change in total Total equity Change in total Revenue per Profit per lawyer Firm Leverage (2018-19) (2017-18) (£m) revenue (£k) in PEP partners partners partners equity partners lawyer (£k) (£k) 1 1 DLA Piper (1) 2111.0 2.8% 1,395 1.9% 1245.7 3.4% 401.0 -0.7% 570.3 151.0 8.2 2 2 Clifford Chance 1693.0 4.3% 1,620 1.3% 562 0.9% 394.0 0.5% 700.7 263.7 5.1 3 6 Linklaters 1628.7 6.9% 1,690 9.9% 464.2 0.9% 442.5 0.6% 692.7 319.7 4.3 4 4 Allen & Overy 1627.0 3.4% 1,660 1.2% 536 -0.4% 388.0 -0.3% 687.7 271.8 5.1 5 3 Hogan Lovells (1) 1577.0 -0.6% 1,029 2.9% 803 -3.9% 523.0 -5.9% 598.3 204.1 4.0 6 7 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer 1472.0 4.9% 1,839 5.5% 377 -4.3% 370.0 -5.6% 993.9 464.6 3.0 7 5 Norton Rose Fulbright (1) 1466.0 -3.9% 675 0.7% 1166.3 -3.8% 681.4 -4.6% 434.3 136.3 4.0 8 8 CMS (2) 1204.0 6.2% 582 1.4% 1041.5 -0.5% 601.9 0.7% 325.3 93.2 5.1 9 9 Herbert Smith Freehills 965.7 4.2% 949 11.4% 452 -2.6% 323.0 -0.6% 461.4 146.5 5.5 10 10 Eversheds Sutherland (3) 875.0 8.7% 865 2.4% 739 9.0% 198.8 4.1% 362.6 71.3 11.1 11 n/a Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (4) 669.0 n/a 627 n/a 544.2 n/a 280.7 n/a 469.6 123.5 4.1 12 12 Ashurst 641.0 13.7% 972 30.8% 392 4.8% 241.0 0.8% 453.0 165.5 4.9 13 13 Clyde & Co 611.0 10.8% 690 4.5% 430 5.7% 219.0 2.8% 355.2 87.8 6.9 14 11 Slaughter and May **(5) 590.0 3.3% 2,300 n/a 109 -2.7% 102.0 -3.8% 1092.6 434.4 4.3 15 15 Pinsent Masons 475.0 5.6% 620 -5.1% 447 4.4% 183.0 2.8% 302.4 71.2
    [Show full text]
  • Bc Disease News a Weekly Disease Update
    25 November 2016 Edition 165 BC DISEASE NEWS A WEEKLY DISEASE UPDATE CONTENTS PAGE 2 Welcome Welcome PAGE 3 Welcome to this week’s edition of BC Disease News. Asons Solicitors Receive Controversial Bail Out From In the last week it has been revealed that Bolton County Council has awarded a Local Council ‘secret’ emergency grant of £300,000 to Bolton based claimant solicitors firm Asons Solicitors Ltd. The timing of the grant has caused much controversy as it PAGE 5 was made alongside a claim by HMRC against Asons, also for £300,000. Elsewhere, the High Court has ruled that a part 36 offer extinguishes a previous common law offer to settle. Part 36 v Common Law Offer To Settle This week we present, in the first of a two part feature, a return to the topic of asymmetrical hearing loss and noise exposure and consider whether it can be Government PI Reforms compatible with a diagnosis of NIHL by considering some recent studies on the Open To Judicial Review? subject. PAGE 6 Any comments or feedback can be sent to Boris Cetnik or Charlotte Owen. Update On Review of Fixed As always, warmest regards to all. Recoverable Costs Majority of Solicitors Fail to SUBJECTS Stick To Budgets Survey Reveals Asons Bail Out – Part 36 Offer v Common Law Offer – Government PI Reforms and Judicial Review – Fixed Recoverable Costs Update – Solicitors Fail To Stick To Feature Budgets – Asymmetrical Hearing Loss and Noise Exposure. Asymmetrical Hearing Loss And Noise Exposure PAGE | 2 Cliff Morris has explained that the grant was intended to assist the firm with its move to Asons Solicitors Receive different premises earlier in the year and to ensure that the 263 jobs tied to the firm are retained in Bolton for the next five years after the firm had suffered losses in the previous Controversial Bail Out financial year.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Yorkshire Law Firms Are Winning the Most Business from Their Website? by Ben Pindar
    NORTHERN LIGHTS RESEARCH YORKSHIRE’S TOP 100 LEGAL FIRMS Which Yorkshire law firms are winning the most business from their website? By Ben Pindar 01423 562400 [email protected] Rated, researched, reviewed and ranked A NEW DIGITAL DAWN How does your law firm win business? Word of mouth here are now more smartphones in the world used to be the #1 winner for than toothbrushes. Like it or not, our professional firms — and still T personal and business lives increasingly rely matters considerably. on technology and online tools. But increasingly, business New research by sales training organisation people go straight to Google Huthwaite International found that people make (or LinkedIn) to see who they 80% of their buying decision before contacting a know, especially when product or service provider. And the internet and needing niche expertise. websites are significant in that decision-making Where you come on Google process. searches matters more than ever. Research shows that 80% of a buying Think about your own recent buying decisions. How decision is made before a new client contacts a business much did you use the internet — possibly without — and most of that is down to internet research. And even thinking about it? Google is now like having a 36% of clicks go to the top spot with 12% to the second third hand — it’s there and you use it, often all day. position - with only 8% venturing beyond page one. Window to the world Winning deals online While law firms have traditionally traded on In our own business, we once thought we would never get decent business from our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Claimant Solicitor 12/13 13/14 14/15 Grand Total
    Number of clinical negligence claims received by notification year 12/13 to 14/15 by claimant solicitor (data as at the end of each respective year) Claimant Solicitor 12/13 13/14 14/15 Grand Total (blank) 606 746 853 2,205 Irwin Mitchell 735 721 677 2,133 Rapid 403 334 193 930 Thompsons 192 441 243 876 Slater & Gordon 292 289 249 830 Hudgell 187 285 346 818 Simpson Millar 147 197 180 524 Fletchers 58 113 267 438 Pryers 126 185 112 423 EAD 128 148 147 423 Quality 105 142 170 417 Leigh Day & Co 124 166 126 416 Foot Anstey 67 159 119 345 Lyons Davidson Limited 123 142 78 343 Coles Miller 81 107 104 292 Bridge McFarland 81 93 108 282 JMW 71 109 91 271 Pattinson & Brewer 84 78 77 239 Shoosmiths 31 87 117 235 Leo Abse & Cohen 46 71 116 233 Hodge Jones & Allen 83 85 60 228 Stephensons 63 70 86 219 Penningtons 70 86 60 216 Withy King 61 66 80 207 Linder Myers 73 67 67 207 Atherton Godfrey 67 76 64 207 Brindley Twist Tafft & James 79 79 47 205 Wolferstans 77 59 65 201 Pannone 56 81 53 190 Dutton Gregory 78 59 52 189 Higgs & Sons 52 70 63 185 Morrish 53 65 59 177 Lime Personal Injury 66 55 56 177 Hlw Keeble Hawson 49 57 70 176 Gadsby Wicks 48 53 72 173 Ashton KCJ 55 61 57 173 Langleys 52 78 42 172 Heptonstalls 66 67 36 169 Blake Lapthorn 78 67 23 168 Hugh James 44 74 47 165 Longden Walker And Renney 58 49 56 163 Fairweathers 50 64 46 160 Forbes 41 60 53 154 Fentons 52 44 53 149 Anthony Collins 52 51 46 149 Bower & Bailey 46 54 47 147 Freeths Cartwright LLP 25 35 85 145 Geldards 37 69 34 140 Thomson Snell & Passmore 20 46 71 137 Bolt Burdon Kemp
    [Show full text]
  • Download Conference Pack
    PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE AND LIABILITY UPDATE LONDON CONFERENCE 19th June 2019 PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE LAWYERS’ ASSOCIATION LONDON CONFERENCE – RECENT CHANGES UNTANGLED Wednesday 19th June 2019 0900–0925 Registration and Refreshments 0925–0930 PNLA Introduction 0930–0950 Chair’s Keynote Address Nicola Rushton QC – Hailsham Chambers 0950–1035 "Loss of a Chance" Michael Pooles QC – Hailsham Chambers 1035–1110 "Legal Advice and Representation in Criminal Cases: Professional Negligence as a Tool to Advance Quality and Remedy Failure" Jago Russell – Fair Trials 1110–1115 "Litigation Funding Update" David Pipkin & David Chase Temple Legal Protection 1115–1130 Refreshments 1130–1200 "Post-Implementation Review of Part 2 of LASPO – 7 February 2019" Robert Wright - Head of Civil Litigation Funding and Costs at Ministry of Justice 1200–1215 Q&A 1215-1300 "Non-Party Costs Orders against Professional Indemnity Insurers" Shantanu Majumdar – Radcliffe Chambers 1300–1400 Lunch 1400–1445 "Expert stunts" Daniel Shapiro QC – Crown Office Chambers 1445–1530 "Brokers Negligence" Neil Hext QC – 4 New Square Chambers 1530–1545 Q&A 1545–1600 Refreshments 1600–1645 "The Future of Disclosure? The Pilot Regime in the Business & Property Courts" Luka Krsljanin - 2 Temple Gardens Chambers 1645–1700 Q&A – Chair’s Closing Remarks PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE AND LIABILITY LONDON CONFERENCE – RECENT CHANGES UNTANGLED EEF Broadway House, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9NQ Wednesday 19th June 2019 ATTENDEES (1 of 2) Helen Brown Paris
    [Show full text]
  • Participants in the 2014 Law Careers Fair
    Participants in the 2014 Law Careers Fair Solicitors Allen & Overy LLP Macfaralnes LLP Ashfords LLP Mayer Brown International LLP Ashurst LLP Michelmores LLP Baker & McKenzie LLP Milbank, Tweed, Hadley McCloy LLP Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP Mishcon de Reya Bevan Brittan LLP Morgan Lewis & Bockius Bircham Dyson Bell LLP Morrison & Foerster (UK) LLP (MoFo) Blake Lapthorn Nabarro LLP Bond Dickinson LLP Norton Rose Fulbright Bristows LLP Olswang LLP Burges Salmon Company Ltd O’Melveny & Myres LLP Charles Russell LLP Osborne Clarke Clifford Chance LLP Pinsent Masons LLP Clyde & Co LLP Reed Smith LLP (Reed Smith) CMS Cameron McKenna LLP Reynolds Porter Chamberlin LLP Covington & Burling LLP Dechert LLP Shearman & Sterling LLP Dentons Sidley Austin LLP DLA Piper LLP Simmons & Simmons Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP Slaughter and May Eversheds LLP Stephenson Harwood LLP Farrer & Co LLP Sullivan & Cromwell LLP Fieldfisher Taylor Wessing LLP Freshfield Bruckhaus Deringer LLP TLT Herbert Smith Freehills Travers Smith LLP Hill Dickinson LLP Trowers & Hamlins LLP Hogan Lovells International LLP Veale Wasbrough Vizards Ince & Co Vinson & Elkins LLP Irwin Mitchell Watson Farley & Williams LLP Jones Day White & Case LLP King & Wood Mallsons SJ Berwin Wilsons LLP Kirkland & Ellis International LLP Withers LLP Latham & Watkins LLP Wragge & Co LLP Lawrence Graham LLP Chambers Legal Services Providers Guildhall Chambers Co-operative Legal Services St John’s Chambers Public Sector Professional Services Government Legal Service (GLS) PwC Professional Legal Education Providers BPP Professional Education (BPP) Cardiff Law School City Law School (City, CLS) Nottingham Law School University of the West of England (UWE).
    [Show full text]