DOCSLIB.ORG

Claimant Solicitor 12/13 13/14 14/15 Grand Total

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Number of clinical negligence claims received by notification year 12/13 to 14/15 by claimant solicitor (data as at the end of each respective year) Claimant Solicitor 12/13 13/14 14/15 Grand Total (blank) 606 746 853 2,205 Irwin Mitchell 735 721 677 2,133 Rapid 403 334 193 930 Thompsons 192 441 243 876 Slater & Gordon 292 289 249 830 Hudgell 187 285 346 818 Simpson Millar 147 197 180 524 Fletchers 58 113 267 438 Pryers 126 185 112 423 EAD 128 148 147 423 Quality 105 142 170 417 Leigh Day & Co 124 166 126 416 Foot Anstey 67 159 119 345 Lyons Davidson Limited 123 142 78 343 Coles Miller 81 107 104 292 Bridge McFarland 81 93 108 282 JMW 71 109 91 271 Pattinson & Brewer 84 78 77 239 Shoosmiths 31 87 117 235 Leo Abse & Cohen 46 71 116 233 Hodge Jones & Allen 83 85 60 228 Stephensons 63 70 86 219 Penningtons 70 86 60 216 Withy King 61 66 80 207 Linder Myers 73 67 67 207 Atherton Godfrey 67 76 64 207 Brindley Twist Tafft & James 79 79 47 205 Wolferstans 77 59 65 201 Pannone 56 81 53 190 Dutton Gregory 78 59 52 189 Higgs & Sons 52 70 63 185 Morrish 53 65 59 177 Lime Personal Injury 66 55 56 177 Hlw Keeble Hawson 49 57 70 176 Gadsby Wicks 48 53 72 173 Ashton KCJ 55 61 57 173 Langleys 52 78 42 172 Heptonstalls 66 67 36 169 Blake Lapthorn 78 67 23 168 Hugh James 44 74 47 165 Longden Walker And Renney 58 49 56 163 Fairweathers 50 64 46 160 Forbes 41 60 53 154 Fentons 52 44 53 149 Anthony Collins 52 51 46 149 Bower & Bailey 46 54 47 147 Freeths Cartwright LLP 25 35 85 145 Geldards 37 69 34 140 Thomson Snell & Passmore 20 46 71 137 Bolt Burdon Kemp 35 56 46 137 Nelsons 39 49 48 136 McMillan Williams 45 45 45 135 Armstrong Foulkes 29 46 59 134 Price Slater Gawne 30 43 58 131 Graysons 50 34 46 130 Plexus Law Ltd TA Cogent Law WP 49 50 30 129 Russell Cooke 41 42 45 128 Express 30 32 65 127 Field Fisher Waterhouse 36 56 35 127 Lees 43 40 40 123 Burnetts 49 49 25 123 Williamsons 45 40 36 121 Devonshires 51 38 32 121 Attwood 12 45 64 121 Lamb Brooks 6 24 90 120 Moore & Blatch 43 47 29 119 The Roland Partnership Specialists 58 37 23 118 Girlings 28 39 51 118 Access Legal from Shoosmiths 34 56 28 118 Hay & Kilner 39 34 40 113 Davies & Partners 42 31 37 110 Switalskis 23 34 49 106 Stewarts Law 31 39 34 104 Waldrons 24 38 37 99 Kingsley Napley 32 29 38 99 MPH 45 28 24 97 McKeag & Co 34 47 15 96 Applebys 37 38 21 96 Lanyon Bowdler 30 31 31 92 Glynns Limited 36 27 29 92 Howells 33 37 20 90 Ison Harrison 38 40 12 90 Attwaters Jameson Hill 27 33 29 89 Powell & Co 27 35 26 88 Harris Fowler 31 34 23 88 Anthony Gold 35 31 22 88 Maxwell Hodge 23 33 29 85 Taylor & Emmet 13 35 35 83 Scrivenger Seabrook 26 36 20 82 Thompson Smith & Puxon 26 19 36 81 Mayo Wynne Baxter 25 26 30 81 Ross Aldridge 38 37 * 78 Yes Personal Injury Lawyers 16 26 36 78 Boyes Turner 39 22 17 78 Wixted & Co * 31 44 77 Levenes 13 35 26 74 Birchall Blackburn 48 16 10 74 MTA 12 8 52 72 Tozers 32 24 15 71 Darbys 28 24 19 71 Clarke Willmott 21 23 27 71 Smith Partnership 25 23 22 70 Michelmores 24 29 16 69 Trethowans 11 30 24 65 Foys 19 21 25 65 Moosa Duke 17 26 21 64 Dental Law Partnership 19 22 23 64 Barcan and Kirby 21 29 14 64 True Personal Injury 34 29 63 Osborne Morris & Morgan 25 22 14 61 Raleys 14 26 20 60 Thompson & Co 15 14 31 60 Dicksons 20 21 19 60 Tees 25 23 11 59 Metcalfes 15 28 16 59 Wilkin Chapman 15 24 19 58 Wilson Browne 21 14 23 58 Graystons 12 16 30 58 Walker Smith Way 20 15 22 57 Corries Ltd 9 19 29 57 S J Edney 10 24 22 56 Scott-Moncrieff & Associates 17 21 18 56 Sarah Barclay Limited 23 19 14 56 Pearson Hinchliffe 17 31 8 56 Liddy's Personal Injury 10 25 20 55 Kiteleys 21 14 19 54 Goodmans Law 34 19 53 Ben Hoare Bell 12 24 17 53 Tilly Bailey & Irvine Hartlepool 18 14 20 52 Stone Rowe Brewer 8 17 27 52 Palmer Hodgson & Heyes 19 30 * 52 Farleys 15 16 21 52 Lester Morrill 14 20 17 51 Barlow Robbins 18 15 18 51 Henmans Freeth 12 28 10 50 Harding Evans 13 16 19 48 Butcher & Barlow 18 12 18 48 Barratt Goff and Tomlinson 27 13 7 47 OP Law Limited * 11 31 46 Ward Gethin Archer 11 16 18 45 Shakespeares 24 14 7 45 Goodlaw 14 13 18 45 Bindmans 17 13 15 45 Alsters Kelley 12 13 20 45 Browell Smith & Co 10 12 23 45 Wake Smith 19 10 15 44 Tandem Law * 17 25 44 MJP 15 20 9 44 Gregory Abrams Davidson 14 17 13 44 Clear Law 20 15 9 44 S V Wadsworth & Co 17 26 43 Potter Rees 17 20 6 43 Wadsworths * 17 24 42 Pearson and Financial Advisers 7 13 22 42 Horwich Cohen Coghlan 18 16 8 42 Chambers 13 23 6 42 Mintons 20 10 10 40 Paul Crowley & Co * 10 27 40 Gaby Hardwicke 11 16 13 40 Iacopi Palmer 20 13 7 40 Ringrose Law 12 15 12 39 Secure Law Limited 15 5 19 39 SheridanLaw 11 15 13 39 O H Parsons & Partners 17 10 12 39 Hampson Hughes * 17 18 39 Clarkson Wright & Jakes 12 10 17 39 Coodes Preston Goldburn 9 22 8 39 WBW 15 16 7 38 Ramsdens Rice Jones Clarksons 6 14 18 38 Mercury Legal 22 16 38 Hopkins 8 9 21 38 Gotelee 7 15 16 38 Bonallack & Bishop 14 11 13 38 Cordell & Co 9 13 16 38 Harrowells 14 9 13 36 Jobling Gowler 14 10 11 35 MRH 16 13 6 35 Pennington Manches * 8 26 35 Hesling Henriques 10 15 10 35 Harrison Clark Rickerbys * 18 13 35 Chadwick Lawrence 15 12 8 35 Cleaver Thompson 21 6 8 35 BLV Law 7 13 15 35 Ward & Rider * 19 13 34 Freemans 9 9 16 34 Irvings * 13 19 34 Bakers 6 15 13 34 Cordner Lewis 9 13 12 34 Swain & Co 14 7 12 33 Sternberg Reed 16 8 9 33 Michael W Halsall * * 30 33 BL Claims * 6 25 33 Camps * 17 14 33 Roberts Jackson 6 19 7 32 Stamp Jackson & Procter 12 17 * 31 Penmans 10 9 12 31 Gordon Dean 9 15 7 31 Asons * 29 31 Shaw & Co * 12 14 30 Pardoes 18 12 30 Dutton Law 9 13 8 30 GSD Law * 13 16 30 HLW Keeble Hawson LLP 5 11 14 30 BTMK 9 10 11 30 Wards 6 15 8 29 Mellor Hargreaves 5 9 15 29 Claim Time * * 25 29 T G Baynes 9 8 11 28 Scott Duff & Co 10 10 8 28 OW Law 23 5 28 Law Room * 24 * 28 William Graham Law Limited 9 12 6 27 Sills & Betteridge 5 8 14 27 St Helens Law Limited 5 12 10 27 New Law * 9 15 26 Nalders 9 17 26 Morgan Jones & Pett 9 12 5 26 Novum Law * 13 9 26 George Ide 12 9 5 26 Forster Dean 8 7 11 26 HPA * * 22 26 Fosters 11 7 8 26 Holmes & Hills 6 * 18 26 Coffin Mew 9 8 9 26 Challinors 20 6 26 Wright Hassall 6 14 5 25 Thomas Eggar 9 8 8 25 Lampkin & Co * 13 11 25 Michael Jefferies Accident * 8 14 25 Kitsons 12 13 25 Freeth LLP 14 8 * 25 Birketts * 12 9 25 Timms 7 7 10 24 Slee Blackwell 8 7 9 24 Ralli * 14 7 24 Patersons 15 * 5 24 Brethertons * 8 12 24 Buckles 8 * 11 23 Woodfines 7 9 6 22 Roythornes 6 * 13 22 Osbornes 5 12 5 22 Jefferies Limited 10 8 * 22 Ersan & Co 11 11 22 DMA Law * 21 22 Ashfords * 13 5 22 Your Lawyers * 6 12 21 Harvey Ingram Shakespeares 21 21 Fieldfisher * * 15 21 DMH Stallard 7 12 * 21 CM * 19 21 Whitehead Monckton * 5 14 20 Laker Legal 5 6 9 20 PHH 5 15 20 Pictons 15 5 20 HCB Park Woodfine 6 * 10 20 Affinity Law 6 * 10 20 Bakers Personal Injury 10 5 5 20 BRM 5 5 10 20 Beers * 5 11 20 Morrisons 9 * 6 19 Blythe Liggins * * 11 19 Curtis Law * 6 11 19 Armstrongs Limited 12 * * 19 Scott Rees & Co 10 8 18 Rodman Pearce 6 12 18 Thorneycroft 5 * 9 18 Underwoods 7 8 * 18 Oliver & Co * 6 10 18 Nockolds * 9 6 18 Pinto Potts 11 7 18 Powell Spencer & Partners 8 5 5 18 Hart Brown 7 8 * 18 GMS Law 5 6 7 18 Baker & Co * 9 5 18 Russell & Russell * 5 10 17 Snipelaw 10 * 5 17 Sydney Mitchell * 5 8 17 Medical Specialists * 7 7 17 Pinney Talfourd 5 6 6 17 Medical Accident Group Limited * * 13 17 E Rex Makin & Co 5 5 7 17 Curtis Legal Limited 6 11 17 Berrymans Lace Mawer 8 6 * 17 Campbell Courtney & Cooney 6 * 7 17 Brachers 8 6 * 17 SJP Law * 13 16 Wiseman Lee 6 6 * 16 The Ellen Court Partnership 5 6 5 16 Michael Lewin 12 * * 16 Lawson West LLP * 6 8 16 Hansells 6 * 9 16 FBC Manby Bowdler * * 10 16 Hilary Meredith Limited * 6 9 16 BHP Law 11 5 16 ADF Law * 12 16 Dale & Newbery 6 6 * 16 Waddington Turner Wall 13 * 15 Smith & Graham 6 9 15 Savas & Savage 5 5 5 15 Scaiff 6 5 * 15 Lamport Bassit * 10 * 15 JMP 6 5 * 15 Norman Jones 10 5 15 Davis Blank Furniss 10 * * 15 James Murray * 5 8 15 Bentley * 10 * 15 Blackburn & Co 8 * * 15 Spencers * * 10 14 Specter Partnership 5 5 * 14 Thomas & Meighen 5 6 * 14 Peasegoods * * 7 14 M R Law * * 8 14 Kesar & Co 6 8 14 Naughtons * 5 7 14 Henshaw Pratt * * 7 14 Harrison Clark 7 7 14 Treadstone Law Limited * * 9 13 Vincents 5 8 13 Oxley & Coward 6 * * 13 Jefferies * * 6 13 L A Steel * 5 7 13 Grindeys * * 9 13 ELS & Cole * 6 * 13 Freeman Johnson 6 * * 13 Chris Kallis * 6 * 13 Ardent Law * 6 * 13 Verisona * 6 * 12 Mulderrigs Rawtenstall 5 * * 12 Lance Mason 6 6 12 Lawrence Hamblin 5 * * 12 Onyems & Partners 12 12 Fraser Dawbarns * 6 * 12 Handley Law 5 * * 12 Dominic Thompson & Co 10 * 12 Crosse & Crosse * 5 5 12 Bhatt Murphy * * 7 12 Boyce Hatton * 11 12 Collins * * 6 12 Simpson, Sissons & Brooke * 7 * 11 Shakespeare Martineau LLP * * 5 11 Thackray Williams 5 * * 11 Merritt & Co * * 8 11 Petherbridge Bassra 5 5 * 11 Pennington Manches LLP * 7 * 11 Horwich Farrelly 9 * * 11 Henmans 11 11 Healys * 5 * 11 Frearsons * * 6 11 Festival Law * 5 * 11 Emerald Law 5 * * 11 Imperium Law * * * 11 Deighton Pierce Glynn * * * 11 CTS Claims Today 8 * * 11 Christian Khan 9 * 11 7 LLP * 6 * 11 Broad Yorkshire Law * * 6 11 Armstrong Luty * 6 * 11 Broudie Jackson Canter The Justice Partnership * * * 11 Blakemores 11 11 Tilly Bailey Irvine * 5 * 10 W H Law * 7 * 10 TLW 6 * * 10 Ronald Fletcher & Co * 5 * 10 Potter Rees Dolan * 8 10 Kenneth Elliott & Rowe 6 * 10 Lloyd Green 8 * 10 GHP Legal * * * 10 Hodgkinsons * 6 * 10 Hereward & Foster * * * 10 J M Skinner * * * 10 Eaton Smith 7 * * 10 Garratts * 9 10 Harvey Roberts & Co * * 5 10 Ellis Jones 6 * 10 Excalibur 8 * 10 Clarksons 5 5 10 C & S * 8 10 Biscoes * 5 * 10 Blavo & Co * 5 * 10 Bridge Sanderson Munro
Recommended publications
  • ELA Annual Report 2012-2013

    ELA Annual Report 2012-2013

    The Honourable Mr Justice Langsta President Employment Appeal Tribunal England & Wales David Latham President Employment Tribunals England & Wales Shona Simon President Employment Tribunals Scotland Lady Anne Smith (to March 2013) Chair Employment Appeal Tribunal Scotland Lady Valerie Stacey (from March 2013) Chair Employment Appeal Tribunal Scotland ELA Management Committee 2012 - 2014 Chair Richard Fox Deputy Chair Richard Linskell Treasurer Damian Phillips Secretary Fiona Bolton Editor, ELA Briefing Anna Henderson Chair, Training Committee Gareth Brahams Chair, Legislative & Policy Committee Bronwyn McKenna ELA Management Committee 2012 - 2014 Chair, International Committee Juliet Carp Chair, Pro Bono Committee Paul Daniels Representative of the Bar Paul Epstein QC In-house Representative Alison Leitch (to January 2013) Mark Hunt (from February 2013) Regional Representatives London & South East – Betsan Criddle and Eleena Misra Midlands – Ranjit Dhindsa North East – Anjali Sharma North West – Naeema Choudry Scotland – Joan Cradden South Wales – Nick Cooksey South West – Sean McHugh Members at Large Merrill April Stuart Brittenden Yvette Budé Karen Mortenson Catherine Taylor ELA Law Society Council Seat Tom Flanagan Life Vice Presidents Dame Janet Gaymer DBE QC Jane Mann Fraser Younson Vice President Joanne Owers ELA Support Head of Operations Lindsey Woods ELA Administration - Byword Sandra Harris Charley Masarati Emily Masarati Jeanette Masarati Claire Paley Finance Administrator Angela Gordon Website Manager Cynthia Clerk Website Support and Maintenance Ian Piper, Tellura Information Service Ltd Bronwen Reid, BR Enterprises Ltd PR Consultants Clare Turnbull, Kysen PR Chair Richard Fox, Kingsley Napley LLP Deputy Chair Richard Linskell, Ogletree Deakins This has been an extraordinary year for ELA and not just because 2013 marks our 20th Anniversary! Until relatively recently, there was a view that employment law had “plateaued”, and that the rate of change had started to mellow.
  • September 14, 2010

    September 14, 2010

    CROSS-BORDER DISPUTE RESOLUTION: THE PERSPECTIVE FOR RUSSIA AND THE CIS The Lotte Hotel, Moscow | 8 bld.2, Novinskiy Boulevard SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 Judicial Assistance and Enforcement Proceedings International Asset Recovery Business and Corporate Raiding Disputes Involving Russian State and State Entities Late-Breaking Developments CONFERENCE WITH SUPPORT OF: STRATEGIC PARTNER: SPONSORS CONFERENCE STRATEGIC PARTNER CONFERENCE PARTNERS LUNCHEON SPONSOR PRE-CONFERENCE SPEAKER DINNER SPONSOR CONFERENCE DELEGATE BAG SPONSOR THERMAL MUGS SPONSOR NETWORKING BREAK SPONSORS MEETING SUPPORTER COOPERATING ENTITIES Federal Chamber of Advocates COOPERATING ENTITIES Moscow City Chamber of Advocates MEDIA SPONSORS Cross-Border Dispute Resolution: The Perspective for Russia and the CIS PROGRAM AGENDA All events to be held at the Lotte Hotel, Moscow located at 8 bld.2, Novinskiy Boulevard, unless otherwise indicated. 7:30 AM Registration and Breakfast Maxim Kulkov, Goltsblat BLP, Moscow, Russia Charles D. Schmerler, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, New York, New York USA 8:30 AM Opening Session Moderator & Program Chair: Glenn P. Hendrix, Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta, Georgia USA Welcome: Glenn P. Hendrix, Immediate Past Chair, American Bar Association 10:30 AM Networking Break Section of International Law, Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, Atlanta, Georgia USA 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Introductions: Show Me the Money: Recovering Assets Abroad Andrew Somers, President and Chief Executive Officer, American Chamber of Commerce in Russia, Moscow, Russia "Winning" the case is great, but did you prepare upfront for the hard part -- actually collecting the money? While never easy against a recalcitrant Opening Remarks: debtor, recovery is especially difficult if the assets are tucked away The Honorable Aleksander Vladimirovich Konovalov, Minister of offshore.
  • Correspondence from the Cabinet Secretary For

    Correspondence from the Cabinet Secretary For

    Ken Skates AC/AM Ysgrifennydd y Cabinet dros yr Economi a’r Seilwaith Cabinet Secretary for Economy and Infrastructure Russell George AM Chair Economy Infrastructure and Skills Committee 31 January 2018 Dear Russell At the scrutiny session of the Economy, Infrastructure and Skills Committee on 17 January, I said I would write to you with additional information in response to the following issues raised by the Committee, which I will respond to point by point: In relation to the Welsh Government procuring a 3% stake in the sports car maker TVR, whether there will be a Welsh Government observer on the board of TVR, and details of who provided independent advice to the Welsh Government as part of the due diligence process in obtaining the equity stake We send an observer to meetings of the Board of TVR Automotive Ltd and in addition, the Development Bank of Wales undertakes independent financial monitoring of the company. It is the Welsh Government senior official with responsibility for managing the TVR account, who attends meetings. We have no voting rights at the company Board meetings but the person attending can make informal observations, though it is not within the remit of the role of the observer to make an active contribution in any decision making. The main function of the observer is to monitor discussions. Prior to committing to the share purchase, we commissioned commercial and legal due diligence from the Automotive Sector Team within KPMG, Hugh James Solicitors and also received advice from Finance Wales, drawing on their broad experience of this type of transaction.
  • Product Liability and Mass Torts in a Global Market Place Welcome: In

    Product Liability and Mass Torts in a Global Market Place Welcome: In

    Product Liability and Mass Torts in a Global Market Place Venue: Lovells, Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London, EC1A 2FG 7 JUNE 2007 Welcome: In the Chair, Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC, 4 New Square, Chair. 9.00 – 9.50 Keynote Speeches: Regulation & Product Liability • “Preemption before the US Supreme Court” : Jeffrey Bucholtz, United States Department of Justice; • “Comparing the US and European approaches” : Tripp Haston, Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP; Stefan Lenze, Lovells ; Duncan Fairgrieve, 1 Crown Office Row; Biicl Questions from floor 9.50 - 11.15 Damages Claims in Parallels Spheres : What can we learn for Products Litigation? In the Chair, John Meltzer, Lovells • “Group actions in the sphere of financial services and antitrust” Alan Owens, Irwin Mitchell • "Tort Law in America: Regulate or Litigate?" : David A. Levy, SimmonsCooper LLC • “Damages Claims under the Environmental Liability Directive” : Charles Pirotte, European Commission • Comments from Neil Fagan, Lovells. Questions from floor. 11.15 - 11.40 Morning Coffee 11.40 - 13.15 Future Challenges in Global Damages litigation In the Chair, Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC, 4 New Square. • “Selecting and Managing a Virtual law firm to handle Global mass tort litigation” Beverly G Baughman, Pfizer Inc • “Future Claims in an Uncertain World”? Steve Mathews, EMB LLP • “Emerging Global Risks : the Trends” Christian Lahnstein, Munich Re and “Trends in Personal Injury Litigation in Europe” Dr Ina Ebert, Munich Re. • “Collective Redress in Europe : the Commission’s Plans” : Dr Alexandra McConnell, Clifford Chance Questions from floor. 13.15 - 14.15 Lunch 14.15 – 15.45 Panel Session 1 US techniques : a solution to Access to Justice in Europe ? MUNLIB01/MUNSFL/159712.01 - 2 - Collective actions; US Claimants firms in Europe; innovative funding techniques In the Chair, Jeremy Stuart-Smith QC, 4 New Square.
  • Your Guide to Choosing a Solicitor 2018/19

    Your Guide to Choosing a Solicitor 2018/19

    your guide to choosing a solicitor 2018/19 www.spinal.co.uk DM_ad_130mm x190mm_HR 18/07/2018 08:59 Page 1 ACCESSIBLE DESIGN By And For Disabled People Award-winning designer ADAM THOMAS, a wheelchair- user since 1981 has over 30 years’ experience of access issues. He is a leading authority on accessible kitchen design and has been involved in projects for the SIA HQ in Milton Keynes, Stoke Mandeville hospital, the Injured Jockey’s Fund and the Olympic Village London 2012. Through his work he has helped hundreds of clients regain their independence, including those affected by catastrophic injury and ABI. DESIGN MATTERS offers a comprehensive end-to-end service from design to installation with outstanding customer support. Each kitchen is tailored to the client’s requirements and provides a fully accessible, safe space that is entirely fit-for-purpose. Some of our clients even report reduced reliance on PAs. APPROVED Tel: 01628 531584 MEMBER www.dmkbb.co.uk 801128 SIA Healthcare A4 Advert_Layout 1 01/02/2018 14:20 Page 1 801128 SIAYOUr Healthcare A4 Advert_Layout 1 01/02/2018 dedicated 14:20 Page 1 home delivery service SIASIA Healthcare's Healthcare's 2,000th 2,000th Member Member GavinGavin Walker Walker OverOver 2,6 2,006 00SIA SIA membersmembers have have chosenchosen it. 9it.2% 9 2of% of SIA Healthcare SIA Healthcare members would members would recommend it* recommend it* SIA Healthcare is a dedicated Home Delivery Service that provides spinal cord injured people with SIA Healthcareall of their urology is a dedicated and stoma Home products Delivery and prescription Service that providesmedication spinal efficiently cord injuredand discreetly people to with all oftheir their door.
  • Lex 100 P014-024 Winners.Qxp 17/08/2007 15:08 Page 14

    Lex 100 P014-024 Winners.Qxp 17/08/2007 15:08 Page 14

    Lex 100 p014-024 Winners.qxp 17/08/2007 15:08 Page 14 Job satisfaction How would you rate your overall job satisfaction? Lex 100 winners 1 Farrer & Co 9.10 2 Harbottle & Lewis LLP 9.00 Analysis = McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP 9.00 This important category is topped this year by Farrer & Co in what’s = Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP 9.00 been a highly impressive overall performance – the firm appears in every single one of our Lex 100 5 Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP 8.75 Winners tables, often near the top, the first firm to do so. So why is this 6 Covington & Burling LLP 8.71 mid-sized London firm so popular with trainees? It certainly sounds a fun place 7 Latham & Watkins 8.67 to work and offers six seats in a wide variety of practice areas. There’s a strong 8 Ashfords 8.63 bond between current trainees, who praise the ‘great people and great mix of work’, ‘unique atmosphere’ and ‘sheer breadth of training = Stephens & Scown 8.63 opportunities’. Media boutique Harbottle & Lewis comes next. Trainees here feel they have ‘considerably 10 Bristows 8.60 better quality work than peers, better experience and more exposure’. Then, as last year, there’s a strong showing = Shoosmiths 8.60 by five US firms: McDermott Will & Emery, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Cleary Gottlieb, Covington & 12 Browne Jacobson LLP 8.58 Burling and Latham & Watkins. These firms have not been offering training contracts for that long in London and all have 13 Birketts 8.50 limited intakes.
  • The Test of Remoteness. at First Sight Wellesley Partners LLP V Withers

    The Test of Remoteness. at First Sight Wellesley Partners LLP V Withers

    TWO IMPORTANT CASES WELLESLEY PARTNERS LLP – the test of remoteness. At first sight Wellesley Partners LLP v Withers LLP [2015] EWCA Civ 1146 is “just another slightly dreary solicitors’ negligence case where attributing fault and assessing damages depended on a combination of close fact-specific analysis and a certain amount of educated guesswork”. The words are not mine, they are those of Professor Tettenborn. However, the learned Professor considers that the case gave rise to two interesting points of law, which it did. It is those I wish to look at briefly. As we all know in very many cases the live issues in professional negligence claims are as much involved with causation and damage as they are with breach of duty and this was a case which resolves important issues which have the potential to impact on a number of claims in the area. The facts of Wellesley can be set out very briefly. Wellesley was a successful firm of head-hunters or as they preferred “executive placement consultants”. It was based in London albeit that one of the founding partners had spun off a business in Hong Kong. In order to facilitate growth it wished to expand the membership of the LLP. One of the new members was to be a middle eastern based bank: ADDAX. The defendant solicitors were engaged to amend the LLP agreement but in doing so, as the trial judge 1 held, mis-drafted the same so that ADDAX could withdraw its money prematurely which, following the Lehman Brothers collapse, it duly did. One of the largest elements of alleged loss related to an allegation that the business had been deprived of the opportunity to open a New York office and to obtain a contract with Nomura which was reconstructing the Lehman Brother business of which it had purchased part.
  • The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): an Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment

    The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): an Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2003 The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Terrance Gerard Galvin University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Architecture Commons, European History Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Galvin, Terrance Gerard, "The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment" (2003). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 996. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Abstract In examining select works of English architects Joseph Michael Gandy and Sir John Soane, this dissertation is intended to bring to light several important parallels between architectural theory and freemasonry during the late Enlightenment. Both architects developed architectural theories regarding the universal origins of architecture in an attempt to establish order as well as transcend the emerging historicism of the early nineteenth century. There are strong parallels between Soane's use of architectural narrative and his discussion of architectural 'model' in relation to Gandy's understanding of 'trans-historical' architecture. The primary textual sources discussed in this thesis include Soane's Lectures on Architecture, delivered at the Royal Academy from 1809 to 1836, and Gandy's unpublished treatise entitled the Art, Philosophy, and Science of Architecture, circa 1826.
  • Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell

    Copyrights sought (Albert) Basil (Orme) Wilberforce (Albert) Raymond Blackburn (Alexander Bell) Filson Young (Alexander) Forbes Hendry (Alexander) Frederick Whyte (Alfred Hubert) Roy Fedden (Alfred) Alistair Cooke (Alfred) Guy Garrod (Alfred) James Hawkey (Archibald) Berkeley Milne (Archibald) David Stirling (Archibald) Havergal Downes-Shaw (Arthur) Berriedale Keith (Arthur) Beverley Baxter (Arthur) Cecil Tyrrell Beck (Arthur) Clive Morrison-Bell (Arthur) Hugh (Elsdale) Molson (Arthur) Mervyn Stockwood (Arthur) Paul Boissier, Harrow Heraldry Committee & Harrow School (Arthur) Trevor Dawson (Arwyn) Lynn Ungoed-Thomas (Basil Arthur) John Peto (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin (Basil) Kingsley Martin & New Statesman (Borlasse Elward) Wyndham Childs (Cecil Frederick) Nevil Macready (Cecil George) Graham Hayman (Charles Edward) Howard Vincent (Charles Henry) Collins Baker (Charles) Alexander Harris (Charles) Cyril Clarke (Charles) Edgar Wood (Charles) Edward Troup (Charles) Frederick (Howard) Gough (Charles) Michael Duff (Charles) Philip Fothergill (Charles) Philip Fothergill, Liberal National Organisation, N-E Warwickshire Liberal Association & Rt Hon Charles Albert McCurdy (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett (Charles) Vernon (Oldfield) Bartlett & World Review of Reviews (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Claude) Nigel (Byam) Davies (Colin) Mark Patrick (Crwfurd) Wilfrid Griffin Eady (Cyril) Berkeley Ormerod (Cyril) Desmond Keeling (Cyril) George Toogood (Cyril) Kenneth Bird (David) Euan Wallace (Davies) Evan Bedford (Denis Duncan)
  • Contentious Commentary

    Contentious Commentary

    Contentioius Commentary 1 Newsletter December 2015 Contentious Commentary Contract money, the obligation to pay the On the penalty spot specified sum is a secondary obligation which is capable of being Contents The rule on penalty clauses is alive! a penalty; but if the contract does English contract law generally adopts The rule on penalty clauses is not impose (expressly or impliedly) a laissez faire approach – the parties restricted but left in place an obligation to perform the act, but can usually do what they want (at simply provides that, if one party Tolling agreement extends to least, unless consumers are involved). does not perform, he will pay the fraud despite lack of mention The rule on penalty clauses is one of other party a specified sum, the Waiver of immunity for assets the few common law rules that obligation to pay the specified sum allows an injunction controls what the parties can agree. is a conditional primary obligation Terms will rarely be implied It bans an agreement requiring a and cannot be a penalty." into contracts party in breach of contract to pay a Contractual remoteness sum out of all proportion to the losses The rule can therefore be evaded by applies to tort claim caused by the breach in order to deter appropriate drafting in some – breach. Because of the rule's perhaps many – cases (though the Securitisation vehicle can sue exceptional nature, it has always court will look to the substance rather valuers been controversial. than the form). Legal context is wide for privilege purposes In Cavendish Square Holding BV v When the rule applies, the test is no Potential waiver of privilege Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67, the longer about reasonable pre- can be undone Supreme Court was offered the option estimates of damages or whether a of abolishing the rule altogether or, clause is a deterrent to breach.
  • Bc Disease News a Weekly Disease Update

    Bc Disease News a Weekly Disease Update

    25 November 2016 Edition 165 BC DISEASE NEWS A WEEKLY DISEASE UPDATE CONTENTS PAGE 2 Welcome Welcome PAGE 3 Welcome to this week’s edition of BC Disease News. Asons Solicitors Receive Controversial Bail Out From In the last week it has been revealed that Bolton County Council has awarded a Local Council ‘secret’ emergency grant of £300,000 to Bolton based claimant solicitors firm Asons Solicitors Ltd. The timing of the grant has caused much controversy as it PAGE 5 was made alongside a claim by HMRC against Asons, also for £300,000. Elsewhere, the High Court has ruled that a part 36 offer extinguishes a previous common law offer to settle. Part 36 v Common Law Offer To Settle This week we present, in the first of a two part feature, a return to the topic of asymmetrical hearing loss and noise exposure and consider whether it can be Government PI Reforms compatible with a diagnosis of NIHL by considering some recent studies on the Open To Judicial Review? subject. PAGE 6 Any comments or feedback can be sent to Boris Cetnik or Charlotte Owen. Update On Review of Fixed As always, warmest regards to all. Recoverable Costs Majority of Solicitors Fail to SUBJECTS Stick To Budgets Survey Reveals Asons Bail Out – Part 36 Offer v Common Law Offer – Government PI Reforms and Judicial Review – Fixed Recoverable Costs Update – Solicitors Fail To Stick To Feature Budgets – Asymmetrical Hearing Loss and Noise Exposure. Asymmetrical Hearing Loss And Noise Exposure PAGE | 2 Cliff Morris has explained that the grant was intended to assist the firm with its move to Asons Solicitors Receive different premises earlier in the year and to ensure that the 263 jobs tied to the firm are retained in Bolton for the next five years after the firm had suffered losses in the previous Controversial Bail Out financial year.
  • The Big Bang Report

    The Big Bang Report

    The Big Bang Report Opportunities and threats in the new legal services market Written by Jon Robins For further information please contact: Roshan Khan Gus Sellitto Fox Williams LLP Byfield Consultancy Tel: 020 7614 2638 Tel: 020 7256 4912 [email protected] [email protected] www.foxwillams.com www.jures.co.uk Introduction The report looks at the impact of the Legal Services Act 2007 on all parts of the legal profession from City to high street as well as its impact on non-lawyer businesses offering legal services. The research is based on more than 50 in-depth interviews with law firms, barristers’ chambers, not-for-profit agencies providing legal advice, representative bodies, prospective new entrants into the legal services market plus regulators of legal services and government agencies. The interviews took place between August and November 2009. Respondents were sent the Big Bang questionnaire, included as appendix 1. The majority of respondents are listed below, however a number asked for their responses to be in confidence. We would like to thank those people and organisations who took the time to help us with our inquiries, including: 3 Hare Court Eversheds Landlord-Law Serle Court 39 Essex Street Faegre & Benson Legal Assistance Direct Sykes Lee & Brydson A4e Field Fisher Waterhouse Moorcrofts LLP Solicitors Regulation Albert Goodman FirstAssist Legal LBC Wise Counsel Authority Amelans Protection Insurance Legal Services Board Solicitors Independent Baker Tilly Forshaws Legal Services Commission Financial Advice