DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Materials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Materials ¥§5 30 Vancouver, WA ¤£ ^ o ¤£26 Hillsboro ^ ¥§84 Tillamook Portland W A S H I N G T O N 5 M U L T N O M A H ¥§ 205 ¤£101 § Milwaukie ¥ ¤£26 ST9!9W T I L L A M O O K ¥§205 ^Oregon City Y A M H I L L Wilsonville 99W McMinnville ST! Donald ¥§5 C L A C K A M A S Woodburn 99E ST9!9W ST! OP18 Brooks Keizer M A R I O N Dallas OP22 o ^ Salem P O L K OP22 5 ST9!9W ¥§ Albany Millersburg £20 ^ ¤£20 ¤ L I N C O L N Corvallis Preliminary Alternatives* L I N N * D a s h e d lin e in d ic a te s Tangent B lu e o p tio n . P a ra lle l c o lo re d P u rp le lin e s in d ic a te u s e o f B E N T O N R e d s a m e a lig n m e n t b y ST9!9E m u ltip le a lte rn a tiv e s ST9!9W ¤£20 Ye llo w E x is tin g T ra in S ta tio n Halsey ^o A irp o rt Monroe ¥§5 Harrisburg Junction City o L A N E ST1!26 ST1!26 Springfield Eugene^ 0 15 [" Miles Preliminary Alternatives O c to b e r 1 , 2 0 1 3 Preliminary Alternatives Oct. 3, 2013 Multiple preliminary alternatives were developed for intercity passenger rail travel between the Eugene-Springfield and Portland-Vancouver, Wash. urban areas, each under the assumption that they would carry up to seven round-trip trains per day. The preliminary alternatives and options are based on the corridor concepts that passed initial screening in January. The corridor concepts were refined into the preliminary alternatives after extensive stakeholder engagement from February through May and following additional engineering work. Portions of some corridor concepts (e.g., purple) passed the initial screening and are part of preliminary alternatives that also use parts of other corridor concepts. In addition to the main alignment, each preliminary alternative has one or more options that were also evaluated. These options are described below and shown on the accompanying map as dashed lines. Blue Alternative: The blue alternative generally follows the existing Amtrak Cascades route, along or near the Union Pacific Railroad line between Eugene-Springfield and Portland. It crosses the Willamette River in Portland near Union Station before continuing north, either on or near existing BNSF tracks, to Vancouver, Wash. The blue alternative could use existing stations. One option for the blue alternative would include adding new track through Parrish Gap south of Salem to shorten the route. A second option would provide a new station east of the Willamette River near Portland’s Rose Quarter, and then continue on new track through northeast and north Portland to Vancouver, Wash. Red Alternative: The red alternative runs along Interstate 5, either just inside of or near the current highway right of way. It follows I-5 from Springfield to the Interstate 205 interchange. Turning east, it follows I-205 north and Interstate 84 west into central Portland (this section was presented previously as the “brown” corridor concept). North of Union Station in Portland, the red alternative would continue on the BNSF line to Vancouver, Wash. The red alternative along I-5 and I-205 would be on all new track dedicated to intercity passenger rail service. It would use existing rail lines west of the I-205/I-84 interchange to Vancouver, Wash. The red alternative could use Portland Union Station, but would bypass existing stations in Eugene, Albany and Salem. It could include new stations in Springfield, Albany, Salem/Keizer and the southern Portland metro area communities for all passenger trains traveling through Oregon. Preliminary Alternatives One option for the red alternative would leave the I-5 corridor south of Albany and use existing track to the existing Albany station and then return to I-5. Another option would provide a route to a new station in Portland’s Rose Quarter and continue through northeast and north Portland to Vancouver, Wash., using an eastside alignment option described above for the blue alternative. For this option, the Portland Union Station would be bypassed. Purple Alternative: The purple alternative uses portions of the existing Oregon Electric line operated by Portland & Western Railroad. It also includes portions of the blue alignment from the Eugene station to the Eugene rail yard; from south of Albany to Keizer; and from Aurora to Vancouver, Wash. It would follow the Oregon Electric line from the Eugene rail yard to south of Albany, where a new connection to the blue alternative alignment would be built. The purple alternative would leave the blue alternative alignment near Keizer and use the Oregon Electric line to just south of Donald, where a new connection to the blue alternative alignment south of Aurora would be built. This alternative could use the existing stations. One option for the purple alternative is to go to Wilsonville and then connect to the red alternative alignment. A second option would bypass Aurora before connecting to the blue alternative alignment south of Canby. Yellow Alternative: The yellow alternative would use the purple alternative alignment from the Eugene station to Junction City. New track would be built from Junction City to Monroe, and then would connect to the existing rail line through Corvallis to Albany, where it would join the blue alternative. This yellow alternative could use most of the existing stations, but it would bypass the Albany station and include a new station in Corvallis. An option for the yellow alternative is to leave the existing rail line in south Corvallis and build new track along Highway 34 that would connect to the blue alternative south of Albany. This option could use the existing Albany station. Goals and Objectives These goals and objectives identify the primary issues the project is intended to address, and will help shape evaluation measures that will be used to assess the preliminary route alternatives. The following goals and objectives reflect comments heard from the six open houses held in January, feedback received from agency representatives and the public through January 22nd and at the Corridor Forum meeting January 25th, and input from the Leadership Council at its January 31st meeting. These goals and objectives were approved by the Leadership Council on January 31st. Goal 1: Improve passenger rail mobility and accessibility to communities in the Willamette Valley. Objectives: 1A – Provide a viable alternative to auto, air, and bus travel between Eugene and Vancouver, WA. 1B – Provide reliable and frequent passenger rail service. 1C – Support multimodal integration at each passenger rail station. 1D – Allow for future passenger rail improvements, including higher speeds. Goal 2: Protect freight-rail capacity and investments in the corridor, and maintain safety. Objectives: 2A – Does not increase conflicts between passenger rail or freight rail and vehicles. 2B – Protect freight-rail carrying capability. Goal 3: Plan, design, implement, maintain, and operate a cost-effective project. Objectives: 3A – Develop a strategy that can be reasonably funded and leveraged with range of investment tools for construction and operation. 3B – Serve the maximum number of people with every dollar invested. Goal 4: Provide an affordable and equitable travel alternative. Objectives: 4A – Provide a viable and affordable alternative for travelers. 4B – Provide equitable investments and service, with consideration to race/ethnicity and income. Goals and Objectives Page 1 Goal 5: Be compatible with passenger rail investments planned in Washington State. Objective: 5A – Provide passenger rail service to meet the existing and future passenger rail demand for an interconnected system in the Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail corridor. Goal 6: Promote community health and quality of life for communities along the corridor. Objectives: 6A – Benefit communities within the corridor. 6B – Minimize negative impacts to communities along the corridor. Goal 7: Protect and preserve the natural and built environment. Objectives: 7A – Support Oregon’s commitment to the preservation of resource lands and local land use and transportation planning. 7B – Reduce greenhouse gas emissions in support of national and state policies to slow climate change. 7C – Avoid and minimize impacts to the natural environment and cultural resources. Goals and Objectives Page 2 Evaluation Results The following charts provide a high-level summary of how the preliminary alternatives performed against the project’s goals and objectives in each of the three analysis sections. The bar graphs show overall performance by section against the project goals. The other charts compare performance against cost; the larger circles in the scatter plots indicate a better score to cost ratio. Section A – Eugene-Springfield to North of Albany NOTE: Goal 5 was not considered in the alternatives evaluations because all alternatives met Goal 5. Performance/Cost Comparison (Larger circles indicate a better score to cost ratio.) Page 1 Section B – North of Albany to North of Wilsonville Performance/Cost Comparison (Larger circles indicate a better score to cost ratio.) Page 2 Section C – North of Wilsonville to Vancouver, WA Performance/Cost Comparison (Larger circles indicate a better score to cost ratio.) Page 3 Upcoming Public Meetings Community Advisory Group meetings CAG Group Date & Time Location Monday, Oct. 14 Metro Council Chamber Portland 6 - 8:30 p.m. 600 N.E. Grand Ave., Portland, OR 97232 Tuesday, Oct. 15 Linn Benton Community College Albany - Corvallis 6 - 8 p.m. 6500 Pacific Blvd. S.W., Albany, OR 97321 Wednesday, Oct. 16 Broadway Commons Salem - Keizer 6 - 8 p.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oregon Passenger Rail Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
    Appendix C Public and Agency Comments and Responses April 2021 Contents Section Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................................C-1 Attachments Attachment C1 Comment and Response Matrix Attachment C2 Comments Received During Public Comment Period Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement C-i APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C C-ii Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C – INTRODUCTION Introduction The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Oregon Passenger Rail Project (Project) in October 2018. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register (FR) on October 19, 2018 (83 FR 53053). Stakeholders were encouraged to provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS through various opportunities from October 18 through December 19, 2018. During the public comment period, ODOT and FRA received a total of 212 comments from members of the public and agency/organization representatives at five (5) public events, through the Project website, and by email and letter. This appendix includes two attachments: • Attachment 1: A matrix containing agency and public comments with responses from ODOT. The comments are organized in groups: agency, organization, and individual comments. • Attachment 2: The original comment submittals. Each comment has an index number which is reflected in the comment matrix and marked on the original comments. Tables C-1, C-2 and C-3 list the commenters along with the index number to find the comments with responses and the original format comments and in attachments 1 and 2, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Needs Assessment
    Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment draft report prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 31, 2014 www.camsys.com draft Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 date March 31, 2014 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment Table of Contents 4.0 Passenger Rail Needs Assessment ................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Existing Intercity Passenger Rail Service................................................. 4-1 4.2 Existing Passenger Rail System Performance ....................................... 4-10 4.3 Cascades Corridor Physical and Operational Needs .......................... 4-18 4.4 Other Potential Corridors ........................................................................ 4-22 4.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 4-29 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 8053-084 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment List of Tables Table 4.1 Oregon Intercity Passenger Rail Stations .............................................. 4-2 Table 4.2 Intercity Passenger Rail Ridership to and from Oregon Stations as a Percent of Total Ridership, FY 2012 ............................................... 4-6 Table 4.3 Destinations of Amtrak Trips Originating at Oregon Stations as a Percent of
    [Show full text]
  • Albany Transit Development Plan
    Albany Transit Development Plan Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 4 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 9 2 Service Area Profile ................................................................................................................... 11 Planning Framework ................................................................................................................. 11 Albany Area MPO ................................................................................................................ 11 Transit Services in the Albany Area ..................................................................................... 12 Concurrent Planning Processes ............................................................................................. 12 Demographic Analysis .............................................................................................................. 13 Population and Employment ................................................................................................. 13 Transit-Dependent Populations ............................................................................................. 15 Travel Patterns .......................................................................................................................... 17 Mode Split ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Map and Descriptions of Preliminary Alternatives (Oct 2013)
    ¥§5 30 Vancouver, WA ¤£ ^ o ¤£26 Hillsboro ^ ¥§84 Tillamook Portland WASHINGTON 5 MULTNOMAH ¥§ 025 ¤£101 § Milwaukie ¥ ¤£26 ST99!W TILLAMOOK ¥§025 ^Oregon City YAMHILL Wilsonville 99W McMinnville ST! Donald ¥§5 CLACKAMAS Woodburn 99E ST99!W ST! OP18 Brooks Keizer MARION Dallas OP22 o ^ Salem POLK OP22 5 ST99!W ¥§ Albany Millersburg £20 ^ ¤£20 ¤ LINCOLN Corvallis Preliminary Alternatives* LINN * Dashed line indicates Tangent B lu e option. Parallel colored P u rp le lines indicate use of BENTON R e d same alignment by ST99!E multiple alternatives ST99!W ¤£20 Ye llo w Existing Train Station Halsey ^o A irp o rt Monroe ¥§5 Harrisburg Junction City o LANE ST126! ST126! Springfield Eugene^ 0 15 [" Miles Preliminary Alternatives October 1, 2013 Preliminary Alternatives Oct. 3, 2013 Multiple preliminary alternatives were developed for intercity passenger rail travel between the Eugene-Springfield and Portland-Vancouver, Wash. urban areas, each under the assumption that they would carry up to seven round-trip trains per day. The preliminary alternatives and options are based on the corridor concepts that passed initial screening in January. The corridor concepts were refined into the preliminary alternatives after extensive stakeholder engagement from February through May and following additional engineering work. Portions of some corridor concepts (e.g., purple) passed the initial screening and are part of preliminary alternatives that also use parts of other corridor concepts. In addition to the main alignment, each preliminary alternative has one or more options that were also evaluated. These options are described below and shown on the accompanying map as dashed lines. Blue Alternative: The blue alternative generally follows the existing Amtrak Cascades route, along or near the Union Pacific Railroad line between Eugene-Springfield and Portland.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecolopolis 5.0 (PDF)
    Ecolopolis 5.0: High Speed Rail in Cascadia April 18, 2011 Contents: Introduction and Acknowledgements 3 Principles of Successful High-Speed Rail: Lessons from Around the World 9 Cascadia High Speed Rail: Alignment and Operations 27 Community Impacts of High Speed Rail in Washington State 58 Laying the Tracks for High Speed Rail in Oregon 77 Scenario 1: Sensible Rail 97 Scenario 2: Cascadia Regional Express: A Feasibility and Impacts Analysis for Improved Passenger Rail Service in the Cascadia Region 122 Scenario 3: True High-Speed Rail in the Cascadia Region 170 2 Introduction and Acknowledgements 3 This is the fifth paper added to the resources available describing the Cascadia megaregion. These “Ecolopolis” papers have been developed through the work of graduate classes concerned with a wide range of regional development, planning, governance, and implementation issues. They are intended to be linked through a common interest in Cascadia and its prospects as a megaregion. In this case, the topic is high speed rail, but the fundamental purpose in addressing this issue is part of the continuing inquiry into what can contribute to a great understanding of the region and what its sense of place, now and in the future. What is an Ecolopolis? Jean Gottman’s “Megalopolis”, first described in 1964 as the urbanized area stretching from Boston to Washington, DC, has inspired the contemporary use of the term “megapolitan” (or “megaregion”) to describe linked cities and the micropolitan areas between them. However, does or should the East Coast’s Megalopolis provide a model for potential Cascadian-scale urban development and interaction? The heavily urbanized nature of Megalopolis immediately seems to clash with Cascadian sensibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Ticket to Portland Oregon
    Bus Ticket To Portland Oregon Felicific Wallache instills no squeteagues miswrite superciliously after Tibold denaturalise coweringly, quite Saiva. Emphysematous and stanedanaptyctic some Bartholomeus ibex erstwhile often or delineatingvaccinates permissibly.some extravagances horridly or slay unblamably. Collenchymatous and dismayed Zorro often What is with stops in some shopping and to oregon, oregon travels directly with safety measures and more moderate tours offered by far is used by the pledge to. Social worker offered her office one-way bus ticket to Portland They certainly come here display all the opportunities in Portland Oregon she said. Reviews on Cheap Bus Tickets in Portland OR BoltBus Greyhound Bus Lines. Frequently asked questions about vouchers tickets and passes answered here. Save before and get fool by booking your buck from Los Angeles to Portland OR on. Portland begins sending homeless people substitute other cities. Civic leaders in Portland Oregon want we start busing homeless people. New York to Portland bus tickets at low prices Compare Greyhound bus schedules for traveling to Portland from New York with daily departures Find bus deals. Megabus - you get what you home for MPR News. Coast north Valley Express Bus Schedule Lincoln County Oregon. Free puppies portland oregon. Is Megabus really $1? Beaverton Transit Center stone a transport hub located in Beaverton Oregon United States Owned and operated by TriMet it past a bus commuter rail the light green station. Airport hubs throughout the US and nonstop international flights to Canada England. French Bulldog Breeder in Portland Oregon 503 349 3944 See home Available Puppies. Does Megabus have toilet? Cost just Go Columbia Area Transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Electric Or Union Pacific?
    Oregon’s Amtrak Cascades Future Alignment: Oregon Electric or Union Pacific? Draft Commentary Introduction In June 2009 the Rail Division of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and Parsons Brinckerhoff issued a draft “ODOT Intercity Passenger Rail Study.” The Study purports to evaluate “the feasibility of moving Portland-to-Eugene intercity service from the current Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) mainline to a somewhat parallel rail route known as the Oregon Electric (OE) alignment.” AORTA (Association of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization seeking to educate decision-makers and the public about the need for and advantages of safe, efficient, environmentally responsible transportation since 1976. AORTA promotes increased reliance upon rail for both passengers and freight, and improved public transportation. Its board and membership include persons with extensive knowledge and professional expertise in transportation planning and operations. AORTA has been involved for many years in the state’s rail planning efforts and is familiar with both the UPRR and the OE branch line of the Portland & Western Railroad. AORTA contends the conclusions and cost estimates of ODOT’s June 2009 Draft Rail Study are not credible. This is, in part, because some of the assumptions were incorrect. AORTA believes the UPRR alignment, a corridor the state has invested in and engaged in extensive planning, is the reasonable corridor and that the cost of moving to the OE far exceeds the estimates published in the Study. Furthermore, the impact of moving to the OE would result in profound social, community and environmental damage that are not easily mitigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Transportation Plan Framework I ITS System Needs
    Albany Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Regional Transportation Plan Framework Adopted by the AAMPO Policy Board March, 23 2016 Prepared by: Albany Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments 1400 Queen Ave SE, Suite 205, Albany, OR 97322 http://www.ocwcog.org/AAMPO / (541) 967-8551 With Assistance from: DKS Associates in association with: Nelson/Nygaard CH2M David Evans and Associates Table of Contents Adopting Resolution ...................................................................................................................... iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iv Albany Area MPO Title VI Notice ................................................................................................. v Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 The Albany Area MPO ............................................................................................................... 1 Albany Area Planning Context ................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2: Plan Overview ............................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................................... 4 The Planning
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Prepared by October 2018 This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT) Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) prepared this Tier 1 environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate improved Amtrak Cascades intercity passenger rail service alternatives for the Oregon Passenger Rail Project (OPR Project). The OPR Project examines an approximately 125-mile segment of the Federally designated Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor (PNWRC) from the Eugene-Springfield urban area to Portland. In addition to this EIS, ODOT is preparing a Service Development Plan (SDP) for the corridor to guide further development and capital investment in passenger rail improvements. The PNWRC has been the subject of intercity passenger rail planning, development and operation for more than 30 years. The PNWRC is one of 11 Federally designated high-speed rail corridors in the United States. FRA designated this passenger rail corridor on October 20, 1992, as one of five original corridors called for in the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. The 466-mile PNWRC serves the most densely populated regions of British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon. It links Vancouver, British Columbia, Seattle, Washington, and Portland and Eugene, Oregon, with growing intermediate communities (including the capital cities of Salem, Oregon, and Olympia, Washington). Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway owns the existing PNWRC railroad infrastructure in Washington, in British Columbia, and in Oregon north of Portland’s Union Station. Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) owns the existing PNWRC railroad infrastructure in Oregon south of Portland’s Union Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Development Plan for the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor Program
    Service Development Plan for the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor Program FINAL UPDATE Service Development Plan For the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor Program FINAL UPDATE September 2017 Washington State Department of Transportation PO Box 47407 310 Maple Park Avenue SE Olympia, Wash. 98504-7407 PNWRC – Service Development Plan Page i Revision History Revision No. Status Date Notes 2009 HSIPR Track 2 Rev. 00 Initial Draft August 2009 application Draft Program Rev. 01 July 2011 Revised per FRA Deliverable Final Program Rev. 02 September 2017 Revised per FRA Deliverable PNWRC – Service Development Plan Page ii Table of Contents Revision History ................................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Service Development Plan Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 2 FRA Service Development Plan Requirements
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail in Cascadia
    Portland State University PDXScholar Regional Planning and Metropolitan Growth Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Management Research Projects Planning 1-1-2011 Ecolopolis 5.0: High Speed Rail in Cascadia Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_planning Part of the Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Portland State University, "Ecolopolis 5.0: High Speed Rail in Cascadia" (2011). Regional Planning and Metropolitan Growth Management Research Projects. 5. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_planning/5 This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Regional Planning and Metropolitan Growth Management Research Projects by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Ecolopolis 5.0: High Speed Rail in Cascadia April 18, 2011 Contents: Introduction and Acknowledgements 3 Principles of Successful High-Speed Rail: Lessons from Around the World 9 Cascadia High Speed Rail: Alignment and Operations 27 Community Impacts of High Speed Rail in Washington State 58 Laying the Tracks for High Speed Rail in Oregon 77 Scenario 1: Sensible Rail 97 Scenario 2: Cascadia Regional Express: A Feasibility and Impacts Analysis for Improved Passenger Rail Service in the Cascadia Region 122 Scenario 3: True High-Speed Rail in the Cascadia Region 170 2 Introduction and Acknowledgements 3 This is the fifth paper added to the resources available describing the Cascadia megaregion. These “Ecolopolis” papers have been developed through the work of graduate classes concerned with a wide range of regional development, planning, governance, and implementation issues.
    [Show full text]
  • COAST STARLIGHT Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    COAST STARLIGHT train time schedule & line map COAST STARLIGHT King Street Station (Seattle) View In Website Mode #14 The COAST STARLIGHT train line (King Street Station (Seattle) #14) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) King Street Station (Seattle) #14: 10:10 AM (2) Union Station (Los Angeles) #11: 9:45 AM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest COAST STARLIGHT train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next COAST STARLIGHT train arriving. Direction: King Street Station (Seattle) #14 COAST STARLIGHT train Time Schedule 30 stops King Street Station (Seattle) #14 Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 10:10 AM Monday 10:10 AM Union Station Los Angeles Tuesday 10:10 AM Burbank Bob Hope Airport Wednesday 10:10 AM Van Nuys Amtrak Station Thursday 10:10 AM 7752 Van Nuys Blvd, Los Angeles Friday 10:10 AM Simi Valley Station Simi Valley, CA Saturday 10:10 AM Oxnard Transit Center 201 East 4th Street, Oxnard Santa Barbara Station COAST STARLIGHT train Info 209 State Street, Santa Barbara Direction: King Street Station (Seattle) #14 Stops: 30 San Luis Obispo Station Trip Duration: 2026 min 1011 Railroad Avenue, San Luis Obispo Line Summary: Union Station Los Angeles, Burbank Bob Hope Airport, Van Nuys Amtrak Station, Simi Paso Robles Intermodal Station Valley Station, Oxnard Transit Center, Santa Barbara 740 Pine St, El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles) Station, San Luis Obispo Station, Paso Robles Intermodal Station, Salinas Station, San José Diridon Salinas Station Station, Jack London Square (Oakland), Emeryville
    [Show full text]