COAST STARLIGHT Train Time Schedule & Line Route
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Simi Valley General Plan Update Technical Background Report 5-1 Chapter 5 Circulation
CHAPTER 5 Circulation 5.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the existing transportation conditions in the planning area. The chapter addresses multi-modal transportation elements including conditions of the City’s local roadway system, transit system, bicycle paths, and goods movement infrastructure. The City of Simi Valley is served by various transportation facilities, including one regional freeway (State Route 118), one freight/commuter rail line, an extensive roadway network, and several bus transit lines. 5.2 EXISTING ROADWAY SYSTEM 5.2.1 Regional Access State Route 118 (SR-118) provides regional access to the City. The facility has three general purpose lanes in each direction and is currently being widened from six to eight lanes, from Tapo Canyon Road to the Los Angeles County line. The freeway carries between 80,000 and 135,000 daily trips in Simi Valley, generally increasing from west to east. There are eight full-access interchanges on SR-118 within the City. These interchanges are Madera Road; First Street; Erringer Road; Sycamore Drive; Tapo Canyon Road; Stearns Street; Yosemite Avenue; and Kuehner Drive. 5.2.2 Functional Roadway Classifications The existing regional and local roadway network in Simi Valley is a hierarchical system of highways and local streets developed to provide regional traffic movement and local access. The following section provides a description of the functional classification of the facilities within the planning area. Figure 5-1 (Cross Sections) depicts typical cross sections for all of the roadway classifications. The street classifications for the major facilities in the planning area are shown on Figure 5-2 (Functional Street Classifications). -
For Sale: $14,500,000 Opportunity Zone Redevelopment Assemblage International District, Seattle, Wa 98104
FOR SALE: $14,500,000 OPPORTUNITY ZONE REDEVELOPMENT ASSEMBLAGE INTERNATIONAL DISTRICT, SEATTLE, WA 98104 SITE HIGHLIGHTS Elliott Bay • 29,190 SF of Land Ferries • 18,588 Building SF • Transit Oriented Development Opportunity Seattle CBD • Located in an Opportunity Zone Port of Seattle • 5 min. walk from King Street Station and across the street from Streetcar Station • Zoning Exempt from MHA (Mandatory Housing Affordability) Contributions King Street Station Pioneer Square 8th Ave S 8TH AVE S Chinatown Street Car Station S JACKSON ST // 409 8th Ave S Stadium District International District/ Chinatown Light Rail Station 701 S Jackson St International District SUBJECT SITE 21,588 VPD SCOTT CLEMENTS DAVID BUTLER 1218 Third Avenue www.orioncp.com P// 206.445.7664 P// 206.445.7665 Suite 2200 P// 206.734.4100 [email protected] [email protected] Seattle, WA 98101 Established in 2010 SEATTLE STREETCAR ImpSErAoTvingTLE communi S TREETCAty links R E GALER ST E HIGHLAND ST Volunteer Park We’re building a SEATTLE ASIAN Lake Union ART MUSEUM VE N modern streetcar FAIRVIEW & CAMPUS DRIVE VIEW A E E PROSPECT ST AIR FRED HUTCHINSON E F V MUSEUM OF CANCER RESEARCH CENTER A HISTORY AND CAMPUS DRIVE H T 0 INDUSTRY 1 system that will FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER Lake Union Lake Union BELMONT A PPark CENTER ALOHA ST Cheshiahud FOR E ALOHA ST Lake Union WOODEN Loop Trail BOATS VE E provide new VALLEY ST VALLEY ST LAKE UNION PARK E ROY ST ROY ST mobility options, MERCER ST E MERCER ST T BROAD S TERRY & MERCER support economic WESTLAKE & MERCER -
Sound Transit 4
1 of 16 Funding Application Competition Regional FTA Application Type Main Competition Status submitted Submitted: April 27th, 2020 4:27 PM Prepopulated with screening form? No Project Information 1. Project Title South Tacoma & Lakewood Station Access Improvements 2. Regional Transportation Plan ID 4086, 4085 3. Sponsoring Agency Sound Transit 4. Cosponsors N/A 5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from WSDOT? N/A 6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor? N/A 7. Is your agency a designated recipient for FTA funds? Yes 8. Designated recipient concurrence N/A Contact Information 1. Contact name Tyler Benson 2. Contact phone 206-903-7372 3. Contact email [email protected] Project Description 1. Project Scope This Project will complete preliminary engineering and NEPA environmental review for station access improvements at the South Tacoma and Lakewood Sounder stations. These improvements will include, but not limited to, sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, lighting and other station area enhancements to improve safety and accessibility for transit riders and the community. The work will also include analyzing transit use around the stations to inform integration of multi-modal improvements and evaluation of parking improvement options at the stations. The scope also includes the development and implementation of an external engagement strategy, including public engagement activities for targeted outreach to underserved communities in the project area. Sound Transit and the cities of Lakewood and Tacoma will identify the infrastructure needs in and around each station that are most critical to removing barriers, improving safety, promoting TOD and improving access to station-area communities. -
Agenda Oxnard City Council Oxnard Community
Written materials relating to an item on this agenda that are distributed to the legislative bodies within 72 hours before the item is to be considered at its regularly scheduled meeting will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, 300 West Third Street 4th Floor during customary business hours. Agenda reports are also on the City of Oxnard web site at www.oxnard.org. AGENDA OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY OXNARD HOUSING AUTHORITY Council Chambers, 305 West Third Street September 17, 2019 Closed Session - 4:30 PM Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council B. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS At this time, a person may address the legislative body only on matters appearing on the closed session agenda. The presiding officer shall limit public comments to three minutes. C. CLOSED SESSION (4:30 PM) 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code section 54956.9 (d)(1)) (City Council) Name of cases: Green Energy Holdings, LLC; Auto Fuels, Inc. v. City of Oxnard, et al. Ventura County Superior Court, Case Nos. 56-2015-00470344-CU-EI-VTA; 56-2018-00512103- CU-MC-VTA. 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2)) (City Council) Based on existing facts and circumstances, there is significant exposure to litigation against the City in one potential case. 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Government Code section 54956.9(d)(4)) (City Council) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council shall decide whether to initiate litigation in three potential cases. -
DRAFT 2019 Table of Contents
DRAFT 2019 Table of Contents Section Page Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 Priorities & Strategies for 2019-2024.....................................................................3 The Agency..........................................................................................................................5 Physical Plant and Properties.....................................................................................8 Service Characteristics & Fares............................................................................... 13 2018 Activities & Accomplishments ..................................................................... 24 2019-2024 Services, Programs, Facilities & Equipment.............................. 34 Financial Plan .................................................................................................................. 47 Appendix A: Environmental Determination of Non-Significance ...................... 51 Appendix B: Public Comments .......................................................................................... 53 Appendix C: Fuel Consumption and Accident Data .................................................. 54 Introduction I N T The Transit Development Plan (TDP) is required by Washington State, Revised Code of R O Washington (RCW) 35.58.2795. The plan is updated annually and submitted to the D U C Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). T I O N Our plan summarizes accomplishments -
Oregon Passenger Rail Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Appendix C Public and Agency Comments and Responses April 2021 Contents Section Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................................C-1 Attachments Attachment C1 Comment and Response Matrix Attachment C2 Comments Received During Public Comment Period Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement C-i APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C C-ii Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C – INTRODUCTION Introduction The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Oregon Passenger Rail Project (Project) in October 2018. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register (FR) on October 19, 2018 (83 FR 53053). Stakeholders were encouraged to provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS through various opportunities from October 18 through December 19, 2018. During the public comment period, ODOT and FRA received a total of 212 comments from members of the public and agency/organization representatives at five (5) public events, through the Project website, and by email and letter. This appendix includes two attachments: • Attachment 1: A matrix containing agency and public comments with responses from ODOT. The comments are organized in groups: agency, organization, and individual comments. • Attachment 2: The original comment submittals. Each comment has an index number which is reflected in the comment matrix and marked on the original comments. Tables C-1, C-2 and C-3 list the commenters along with the index number to find the comments with responses and the original format comments and in attachments 1 and 2, respectively. -
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness. -
Washington Operation Lifesaver Executive Committee Meeting
Freighthouse Square – Dome District Development Group DRAFT Meeting Summary Date: December 9, 2013 Time: 4:30 p.m. to approximately 6:00 p.m. Location: Freighthouse Square (FHS), West End Present: City of Tacoma: Ian Munce, Robert Thoms, Don Erickson WSDOT Rail Office: David Smelser, Carol Lee Roalkvam, Jason Biggs, Frank Davidson Sound Transit: Eric Beckman Freighthouse Square Owner: Bryan Borgelt VIA Architects: Mahlon Clements, Trey West Dome District Development Group: Janice McNeil, Jori Adkins, Rick Semple New Tacoma Neighborhood Council: Elizabeth Burris AIA SWW: Ko Wibow, Aaron Winston Coalition for Active Transportation: (?) Tacoma News Tribune: Peter Callahan, Kate Martin Others (3) ______________________________________________________________________________ The following is a draft summary of this meeting. Please send any suggested revisions or clarifications to Frank Davidson at [email protected] 1. Introductions • Ian Munce called the group to order. • Janice McNeil, President of the Dome District Development Group, introduced herself and asked that everyone introduce themselves. 2. Project Overview and FRA Review • David Smelser thanked the group for gathering for an update on the Tacoma Station Relocation portion of the Point Defiance Bypass project and recent developments with the station. He gave a brief overview of the Point Defiance Bypass project, which is one of multiple projects funded through a grant administered by the Federal Rail Administration (FRA). • Ian Munce asked David to start with a status of discussions on the platform between C and D Streets for Freighthouse Square (FHS) and parking, as he said this was the impetus for convening the Dome District Advisory Group in the first place. o David reviewed the original concept as presented in the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI). -
Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text Text
CHAPTER 7: CIRCULATION CHAPTER 7 CIRCULATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 7.0-1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................... 7.0-1 Relationship to Other General Plan Elements ................................................................. 7.0-1 Issues and Objectives ........................................................................................................... 7.0-2 Local and Regional Requirements................................................................................... 7.0-2 Pinole’s Existing Circulation System ................................................................................ 7.0-3 Bicycling Facilities and Programs .......................................................................................... 7.0-4 Pedestrian Systems .............................................................................................................. 7.0-7 Other Transportation Systems .............................................................................................. 7.0-7 Airports............................................................................................................................ 7.0-7 Parking ............................................................................................................................ 7.0-7 Existing Transportation Programs ........................................................................................ -
Amtrak Santa Clara to Sacramento Schedule
Amtrak Santa Clara To Sacramento Schedule Volatilisable and syzygial Tray interrupts some ginnels so devouringly! Vectorial Merry parbuckles some paramounts and complicating his weft so biannually! Crabwise Cletus discharging her burdens so piecemeal that Westleigh unsnap very unrighteously. The rancho cucamonga metrolink station to sacramento to violence in el paso robles amtrak instead of travel In sacramento to amtrak tips, schedules subject to find a scheduled departure times in. Amtrak can get engine to Sacramento from 165 cities including Los Angeles. Take a mortal at each route we propose that this trip. How business get from Santa Clara to Sacramento by warm or car. Street from santa clara amtrak staff in life for your help you see the schedule. The only even to know my cost for accommodations is negligent either lunar or stock on their website. Er 439 Der S Tue 1 ROL DE Subject all of bill SAN JOAQUIN. Trains on amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule when i wonder whether this really matters to sacramento? Yosemite Lodge in Yosemite Valley. California to sacramento to clark street. The new Amtrak Viewliner roomettes do not have their own toilet. Track all important calendar dates the candidates and race results for the. California to sacramento, schedules and all scheduled departure times when you decide to get personal information and this? The santa clara and friday evening, eugene or to call is to log in. Metra passengers each week. The sudden death of amtrak santa clara to sacramento schedule on other? Was wondering if you often explain how me howit works when ticket buying for a bedroom. -
Agenda Packet
CITY OF CAMARILLO CITY COUNCIL IN THE CAPACITY OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CAMARILLO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES AND FOR HOUSING PURPOSES 1 SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2013 – 5:00 P.M. ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE ROOM 601 CARMEN DRIVE, CAMARILLO, CALIFORNIA AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. CLOSED SESSION The City Council will consider the following item in closed session: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of Litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Government Code Section 54956.9; Number of cases: one V. ADJOURN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, IF YOU NEED SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, PLEASE CONTACT THE CITY CLERK AT (805) 388-5353. NOTIFICATION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING WILL ENABLE THE CITY TO MAKE REASONABLE ARRANGEMENTS TO ENSURE ACCESSIBILITY TO THIS MEETING. 1 On January 11, 2012, the Camarillo City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-8 electing to serve as the successor to the Camarillo Community Development Commission for redevelopment purposes pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173(d)(1). On January 11, 2012, the Camarillo City Council adopted Resolution No. 2012-9 electing to have the City retain the housing assets and functions previously performed by the Camarillo Community Development Commission pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34176. CITY OF CAMARILLO CITY COUNCIL IN THE CAPACITY OF SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE CAMARILLO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR REDEVELOPMENT PURPOSES AND FOR HOUSING PURPOSES 1 SPECIAL MEETING WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27, 2013 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 601 CARMEN DRIVE, CAMARILLO, CALIFORNIA THIS MEETING FOLLOWS THE CAMARILLO SANITARY DISTRICT MEETING CONVENING AT 5:00 P.M. -
Passenger Rail Needs Assessment
Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment draft report prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 31, 2014 www.camsys.com draft Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 date March 31, 2014 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment Table of Contents 4.0 Passenger Rail Needs Assessment ................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Existing Intercity Passenger Rail Service................................................. 4-1 4.2 Existing Passenger Rail System Performance ....................................... 4-10 4.3 Cascades Corridor Physical and Operational Needs .......................... 4-18 4.4 Other Potential Corridors ........................................................................ 4-22 4.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 4-29 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 8053-084 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment List of Tables Table 4.1 Oregon Intercity Passenger Rail Stations .............................................. 4-2 Table 4.2 Intercity Passenger Rail Ridership to and from Oregon Stations as a Percent of Total Ridership, FY 2012 ............................................... 4-6 Table 4.3 Destinations of Amtrak Trips Originating at Oregon Stations as a Percent of