Responses from the wider public in respect of the felling licence application to the Forestry Commission for (those not sent consultation letters) Response I am writing to express my support for the planned tree felling and protective actions on the site. I know this has been an long process but it is important that these actions are not delayed further in order to ensure this already protected monument is not further damaged by the invasive trees and shrubs that are causing so much damage. The reason I support this plan is to preserve this valuable element of our ancient history that will help illustrate to us all, and perhaps more importantly to our younger generation, how people populated our area and their impact on our culture and heritage. It is vital that we are able to gain this insight into their lives, habits and behaviours to allow us to see our ancestry in real terms. It will, if protected and developed appropriately be able to be used as a real educational site for local and national schools and will bring the welcome addition a much needed historical visitor attraction in the town. I know many are concerned about the felling of the trees outlined in the plan but your proposed planting of an additional woodland stance of trees along with the development of the natural open grassland habitat should be highlighted as a benefit of this plan. It will ensure both our environment and the local wildlife are protected and cared for. I look forward to this important work progressing in a sympathetic manner for the Hill Fort and the surrounding landscape. Above all visiting the site again with my grandsons to show them something truly important and significant from our ancient history. I totally support the plan to fell trees on the Hillfort, to rescue and preserve this valuable ancient monument, to open up the views to Brean Down, and Sand Point and to re-establish limestone grassland. As a volunteer on the hillfort I have been gratified that visitors including walkers, dogwalkers and families have thanked us for our part in opening up and preserving the site. Having been a resident of Weston for over 30 years I have never before seen the hillfort so well exposed. I appreciate the felling of trees is controversial, but this is only 5% of Weston woods. I applaud NSC's rewilding scheme and will personally be helping with the planting of 5,000 new trees in other areas. This is important work to preserve the Hillfort, but there should be replacement tree planting to compensate for those lost. I see that objective 1.6 of the work plan is to "Seek to plant new woodland of similar size". Can you tell me if this objective is moving forward? A short message to register my support for the NSC initiative regarding the removal of the Worlebury Hillfort from the Historic At Risk Register. I am very keen to see this internationally important ancient preserved for future generations to enjoy . It is the most significant historical structure that Weston pocesses and it will be lost to posterity if action is not taken I am also keen to see the re-instatement of the limestone grassland that it should occupy, with the attendant increase in diversity of the related flora and fauna. The hillfort currently occupies an area of scrubland populated by invasive species which is rarely visited and which has the potential to be an area of real public amenity offering a variety of attractions to residents and visitors. I am completely in favour of clearing and thinning the trees at the Hillfort. It will be a small percentage of the total trees of Weston Woods and it's about time we started looking after this historical site, before it becomes even more damaged by tree roots etc. I am in complete agreement with the planned proposal for reducing the trees on the hillfort. It’s brilliant....well overdue! I would like to say that I am supportive of the decision to clear the hillfort area of trees quite a few being non native anyway. When the area is returned to the original grassland everyone will be able to appreciate the monument. I must register my protest in the most vigorous of terms regarding the misguided and destructive proposal to fell tress at Worlebury Iron Age Hill Fort. All available trees are required at this time of climate crisis. The proposal would have some merit if the fort still retained formed walls that could be destabilised by tree roots. But it is little more than a pile of stones, that will be negligibly impacted by trees nearby. The removal of the trees is more likely to cause damage to the fort and the surrounding features than the tress remaining in place. The trees assist in stabilising the earthen banks which surround the fort, and which the fort is built upon. I would like to express great concern at the proposal to fell thousands of trees as part of restoring Worlebury Camp Iron Age Hillfort in Weston Super Mare. I understand the desire to restore the Hillfort and would always support any effort to save old buildings, sites of historic interest etc and believe they should be preserved as far as possible. I am very pleased for example that Birkenbirk Pier in Weston Super Mare will hopefully soon be rescued. However, there is also a clear need to preserve and infact increase the number of trees in our present climate change emergency. Could some compromise be found where much fewer numbers of trees are felled and care is taken to preserve those which are of particular significance? I understand extensive tree clearing of the Hillfort site is being considered by the N. Council, possibly as many as 6,000 trees! Whilst I can understand the need to protect this site this would seem like overkill particularly bearing in mind the woodland has been there for 200 years. I would imagine much of the area you propose clearing will not reveal any Hillfort structures to the visitor and as such it is not really recreating the original environment. Possibly you could limit the tree felling to only those that have planted themselves within or bordering the main structures? Vegetarian growth and vandalism will not necessarily be reduced by the proposed felling and will need to be addressed similarly whichever outcome. Obviously we are all concerned with the environmental crises we are facing and we cannot afford to lose 6,000 trees, certainly planting new trees is brilliant, but take this action in addition to saving existing woodlands. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to comment. I am concerned about the proposed tree felling at Fort at a time when we need to plant trees and look after the trees we have. I remember the last time trees were felled in the wood and the destruction it caused and the promotion of all the brambles we now have How is this going to be achieved with out destruction to the wildlife and what is proposed to deal with the stumps are they going to be poisoned ? And again how will you deal with the brambles . While I appreciate the significance of the fort I do not think it should be at the cost of the trees and wildlife at a time when we are all trying to do our best for the environment. Once cleared will it attract more visitors to the site and therefore more destruction with people looking at the views Many questions to be answered before people will be happy with this proposed destruction. I've recently read with considerable concern the plans posted on the Council's website for destroying a large area of woodland on Worlebury Hill, as part of work focussed almost exclusively, it would appear, on the hillfort. The term 'heritage' is often misappropriated in my view to give kudos to projects that might well have some intrinsic value, but when viewed in terms of their costs and benefits to the local and wider community, should not, on balance, go ahead. In the case of the Worlebury Camp plan, I would argue strongly that woodland that has become an established place of recreation, contemplation and retreat since Victorian times, is as much a part of the town's heritage as the more ancient earthworks it now grows in and around. These two important features of Weston's landscape should not be presented, as they are in the plan, as being mutually exclusive and I would take particular issue with the clearance of some six hectares of woodland being partly justified on the basis that it has somehow encouraged fly tipping, vandalism and other anti-social acts. As a regular walker in these woods since 1984, I have seen no evidence of any serious problems in this regard. What I have increasingly come to appreciate and value though, is the rich diversity of wildlife that such woodland generates and maintains. It is not just the trees that we will lose if this plan goes ahead. At a time when the council is at long last declaring a climate emergency and taking some first steps toward carbon neutrality through rewilding and other eco-friendly policies, it also goes without saying that the Worlebury Camp project represents a backward step. The trees that will be felled if this plan goes ahead are already playing their part in carbon capture and it will be many years before new planting elsewhere will make good the loss. In this context, the fabric of the hillfort can wait in my view for times when there is less strain on the environment. Indeed, it could be argued that the hillfort would be better preserved by doing nothing, apart from very localised digs, to change the current balance between stone and tree. The uncovering of these admittedly important sites can sometimes end up ruining the local environment rather than preserving it. From my observation of the work already carried out, I would have to add that there is already a danger of this, with bramble quickly taking over the large space that has been opened up in and around the many storage pits now on display. Properly managing this area alone will take a considerable amount of volunteer time and other resources. Clearance of the diverse woodland habitat all around this open space consequently runs the risk of over-reaching itself and ending up as a monument to the council's folly, rather than it being the valuable and much loved place it already is. To this extent, pressing ahead with the plan, in the absence of any properly consultative process, is likely to generate a great deal of resistance. Please therefore take the time to engage fully with local residents and regular visitors to these much loved woods and take their views on board before felling any more trees, other than those threatening the general health of the present eco-system. I object to the plans to remove the tree’s surrounding the old fort area in W-s-M woods. It feels very backwards to be cutting trees down in this day and age. Also, Is there anything in place to stop this land from ever being built on in the future? I go to the woods every day with my dog and walk and run through it, I have noticed the amount of dead trees and trees that have fallen hanging on still live trees very dangerous in a wind. Now the council have decided to clear many more trees maybe if they actually managed the place it would help not cut down live trees. We need the trees there it gets very windy and they do help with sheltering you when walking and can we really afford to cut down any more trees it's hardly a wood now so many been lost. Try planting new trees and keeping the hill fort clear of growth near it it's lovely as it is don't destroy what's left of it.

I would like to object the proposal to fell trees at Worlebury fort. I feel this is short sighted for our environment and most of all I cannot see how this is financially viable for Weston even if they do manage to get funding from the lottery. There are much better things within Weston to spend that money on. Like dealing with Birnbeck I write to object to the above as I consider it to be detrimental on aesthetic, environmental and democratic grounds. I have been a frequent visitor to the woods for over 50 years. I would agree that during this time the hillfort has degraded with encroachment from the woodland. However, the level of destruction proposed is beyond what is required.The work already done has returned the area to pre 1970 conditions. The proposed additional work goes too far. The woods represent the only publicly owned open access forestry within walking distance of Weston. Hutton hill is mainly privately owned and with limited access via a few footpaths. The positive value of this woodland to the physical and mental wellbeing of the people of Weston cannot be overstated. The proposed clearance to limestone grassland is folly. As you have already indicated we already have similar barren areas at sand point and Brean Down. They are very exposed to the elements. Wind, rain and excess Sun. In the councils own letter you have stated that tree felling will not take place in the bird nesting season. However, when the birds next return to nest the trees will be gone. Will sheep be used to keep the grassland grazed and under control. It has been stated that some of the trees in the woods are not native. I do not see this as an issue as if it were there would be a case for felling every arboretum in Britain. It should be remembered that the woods are managed by the council on behalf of the people. If a radical change is proposed, like this, it should only happen with the consent of the people. It appears that these proposals are being pushed forward by groups of well meaning enthusiasts. However, the most important Pont of reference are those most directly effected. The fact that the woods were planted by the Victorians is irrelevant every inch of is the result of mankind's interference including the hill fort. One era cannot be adjudged more important or relevant than any other. We are where we are. The woods provide greater value than the proposal. You state that the loss of trees will be compensated for by planting elsewhere given the climate emergency we find ourselves in. I would suggest the proposed planting, whilst a step in the right direction, falls well short of the levels required. I trust you will note my comments and will give further thought before removing any more trees. I would like to express my concern about the plans to fell hundreds of trees in and around the hill fort at the end of Weston Woods. At a time of global warming we should be conserving our natural woodland, not destroying it, for something that could well be discard from the town quarry in Victorian times. I was always told this was the case growing up in Weston in the 1950s. A report by English Heritage also implied that this may be the case. There is also the loss of habitat for wild life that make their home in this area, in particular owls and the many species of bats I have seen on evening walks. The volunteers have struggled over the past few year to keep the part already cleared free from Ivy and brambles which seem to reappear with vengeance each spring, so I’m not sure how they will cope with the vast area proposed, and what happens when there interest wains in a few years as it has in the past? I feel the money would be better spent on good management of the Woods to enhance the amenities enjoyed by the many hundreds of cyclists, walkers, families and not on a 'vanity project' only of interest to a few. I will be letting my feelings known to our local MP, media and any conservation group that might be interested in this pointless vandalism. I am very much in favour of preserving archaeology, but really in the current climate of climatatic change!! Taking down so much vegetation, & possibly felling a great number of trees, is that really necessary. To whom is it going to benefit, & the costs of doing so needs to be transparent! Every living thing on this planet is here for a reason not just the human race. Surely there needs to be a compromise. I am sure the sight would benefit education, & tourism being more visable, but hey it has its own natural protection at present. What archaeology is going to protected. The Romans destroyed it, we already know. So why now try to show off the sight? I think many people in, & around North somerset feel that removal of trees on that peninsula of land will destroy it, to suit just a few! Please don't let us protest over this, just reflect on what you are actually proposing!! I am writing to register my objection to your proposal to cut down the trees surrounding the hill fort. I appreciate your good intentions regarding the preservation of the Fort but this is not an appropriate use of funds at this time given the climate emergency. We need to preserve as many trees and woodlands and possible. Please retain Weston Woods as they are - a valuable environmental asset to the town. As a qualified horticuturalist and resident of Weston-super-Mare, I have recently become aware of the councils plans to fell woodland in Worlebury camp. Whilst I appreciate the need to preserve historical sites I would urge the council to rethink the felling of such a large area of trees for the following reasons: 1. It goes completely against the councils latest initiative to Re Wilding. Unless the plans are to fell the trees and re plant with a mixture of native broadleaf species, wild plants and shrubs to increase bio diversity then, I see no sense in felling them at all. 2. You will disturb natural habitats which are becoming evermore valuable to wildlife. 3. You will further decrease the total tree canopy cover of this country. 4. You further promote the attitude to the community both young and old that it is acceptable to simply fell trees and clear land. Your Re Wilding plans set a very positive standard that should hopefully spread the importance of conservation that will benefit wildlife and the local community in the long term as well as the overall environment. 5. You could further decrease the numbers of small mammals, insects, soil borne organisms and invertebrates by destroying a long standing collection of habitats. I reiterate that my partner and I stand against the councils plans to fell these trees, and encourage their protection. I have been reading the proposal to fell trees in the environs of the hill Fort in Bury Woods with some dismay. I am a keen historian, and proud of our heritage, but in all honesty, cannot see the need to get rid of so many trees in this site. Most people to whom I have spoken have little or no interest in the hill Fort, which tbf, is monumentally uninteresting in itself, but do have a love of the woods. I hope that this proposal is not going to go ahead as it stands, and will follow its progress with interest. LEAVE WESTON WOODS AS IT IS. SPEND THE MONEY ELSE WHERE This is my objection to chopping loads of trees down... Well done. Made my kids cry. Hope your happy. And it a waste of money. Theres loads better things it could be spent on.. Like helping people and stuff After recently seeing the plan of removing 2000 trees around worlebury hill fort, I felt I needed to voice my concerns. Whilst I understand 2000 trees may not seem like much compared to the full scale of Weston woods, in this modern age where climate change and global warming are increasingly becoming a large concern, I feel like we need to start looking forward instead of looking back. As you likely already know, trees are a large factor in slowing down global warming, acting as a large carbon dioxide store and have proved to be vital for life on Earth. A lot of forests and woods have been burnt or cut down across the world, which not only contributes to global warming through combustion but also the loss of carbon stores. Weston woods may not be comparable in size to these larger forests across the world, but at this stage, any carbon store is drastically important. I noticed that the North Somerset council have declared a climate emergency and hope to get North Somerset to a carbon neutral state by 2030. Chopping down 5% of the woods is not the way to do this, and it will make it even more difficult to get North Somerset to the carbon neutral state. I also noticed that on the page it said that cutting down these trees will increase biodiversity in the area. What about the animals that lived in those trees? I understand that history is important, and that it needs to be preserved in order for future generations to see what past generations have accomplished. I agree that history should be preserved, however there has to be a more environmentally safe way to do so. The Weston hill fort has stood for many, many years, and it can continue to do so without this plan. Right now we need to focus more on what’s happening around us and will continue to happen unless we take action. Plant more trees, rather than cut them down. Help the earth, don’t help to destroy it. WHAT RUBBISH ARE YOU NOW PROPOSING! THE WINTER GARDENS LOOK APPALLING - WHERE ARE THE PROMISED PLANTS. THE SEAFRONT IS TATTY. THE OLD PIER IS FALLING APART. TREES ARE GOING TO BE DESTROYED TO MAKE A BUS DEPOT! AND NOW YOU PROPOSE TO WRECK THE WOODS. WHAT ABOUT THE DEER? WHAT ABOUT THE BIRDS? WHAT ABOUT THE SQUIRRELS? WHAT ABOUT THE PLANTS WHICH GROW UNDER THE TREES? HOW MANY PEOPLE ACTUALLY VISIT THE SETTLEMENT? LESS THAN A FEW HUNDRED A YEAR I BET! AND THE COUNCIL HAS SAID IT WANTS TO INCREASE TREES AND PLANTS TO HELP REDUCE CLIMATE CHANGE! WELL! WELL! YOU COULD HAVE FOOLED ME!!!! STOP THE PROPOSED FELLING NOW!!!!!!!!! I would like to make a complaint about the proposal to fell trees at the site at Weston Woods, or also known as Worlebury fort camp. I cannot understand why it would be to anyone’s advantage to remove any further trees from the area? We are very lucky in Weston to have such a beautiful woodland on our doorsteps that is abundant with wildlife, everything from owls, to Jays, hedgehogs and badgers and Weston Council is willing to put this at risk for the sake of a monument that is beyond repair and would only see costs increase over years to come as the council attempt to find funding to maintain it. We are at a point globally where we should be looking to increase natural habitats for all of our futures not remove them. I would much rather see any money go towards the restoration and investment in the woodland. I have been concerned over the last year about how much of the natural habitats have already been lost due to mindless felling and clearance of the foliage around the camp. I have not made any complaints as I could see locals were trying to investigate what may have been at the site historically and can understand peoples interest. However I feel it has already gone too far. From Weston seafront you can already see the impact of the felling where there is now gaps in the canopies of trees and it does nothing but ruin what was a beautiful view up towards the hill. I dread to think how this has impacted the nature on the hill already and can only see devastation ahead for the populations of birds and mammals currently living there. Why would be want to remove their homes? What right do we have to evict them? I am really disappointed that the council are not looking at what the woods already bring to Weston rather than trying to take them away. I appreciate Weston wants to make the most of what this area has to offer, but who is going to pay for the ongoing maintenance of the fort? The current volunteers (often only 1 or 2 on site regularly) are clearly already struggling to get support to continue maintenance on the areas they have already cleared. What happens when they stop? When they decide to disband or give up? We are left with a monument that is nothing more than a pile of rubble that no one can afford to pay for. I read the report provided by English Heritage and they themselves were unable to confirm if this is in fact a major fort of great interest and too pointed out the ditches could just be prospecting holes from mining over the years and in fact nothing to do with the original site. The only reason they suggested felling more trees was because they couldn’t actually confirm if was a fort of great interest! This feels to me like throwing good money after bad when there are surely better causes to be requesting lottery funding for. Please do the right thing and ensure the safety of our beautiful woodland by protecting that, not the fort. Please be aware I will be contacting local/national media and nature conservationists to ensure this request to ruin our natural woodlands is brought to light I'd like to register my objection in the strongest possible terms to the proposed felling of six hectares worth of trees and other foliage in order to uncover the ruins of the hillfort in Worlebury Woods. I live up on the hill on Shrubbery Road, beneath where the proposed clearances will take place. I regularly walk up on the hill and I can say without hesitation that Weston Woods are my favourite part of living where I do. I have seen the volunteers clearing the area around the pits on the western end of the hill previously but I only discovered the full extent of the felling proposals the other day. As far as I am aware there are no notices up in the woods with information on the felling proposals, just vague signs asking people to look after the fort as it currently is. Cutting down 6 hectares worth of trees would be an absolute tragedy. On a personal level, losing an environment that I value so highly, and which is so important to my own mental health, would be devastating. But alongside this, we are in the midst of a Climate Crisis. North Somerset Council and Weston-super-Mare Town Council have both declared a Climate Emergency in recent months, and it is impossible to see how these statements are compatible with the wilful destruction of what amounts of 9 football pitches worth of forest and other vegetation. The plans state that this is in line with the council's rewilding policy but I can't see how cutting down such a large part of the one of the few areas of forest that we have can possibly be justified in this context. Alongside the tree felling, the Conservation Management Plan advocates the use of pesticdes and herbicides to prevent any further growth, further emphasising how incongruous the use of the term "rewilding" is in this context. The plans emphasise how the tree felling will also add to people's "enjoyment of the hillfort" by opening up views across the and making the hillfort more visible, but these statements presume that everybody shares the views of those in favour of the clearances. For myself, the backdrop of trees lining the top of the hill above the town is a key part of what makes Weston-super-Mare so aesthetically pleasing - an important factor for a town that relies so heavily on tourism. Alongside this, we already have two bare, unforested hills north and south of Weston in the form of Sand Point and Brean Down. Given that visitors to both sites can already enjoy uninterrupted views across the Bristol Channel from these sites, why do we need to decrease the diversity of the local area by providing the same from Worlebury Woods? I understand the cultural and heritage significance of what remains of the hillfort. When I initially saw the volunteer groups clearing the pits on the west end fo the hill and asking people to refrain from moving the stones from the ruins I was broadly in support of what they were doing, but destroying so many acres of thriving forest in order to preserve what amounts to piles of dead rock cannot be the answer. I also worry about what the ultimate aim for this enivornmental destruction is - will we end up with fenced-off ruins lined with gravelled paths and information hoardings? A car park and a National Trust cafe? The initial consultation which has led to these plans seems to have been very porly advertised, with the only responses seemingly being from members of the Worlebury Hill Fort Group. I find it hard to believe that the council could take such a drastic step without making every effort to fully involve the residents of Weston-super-Mare, most of whom seem entirely unaware of what is being proposed. In both the consultation comments and the recent press release, the woodland is described as a problem - something to be got rid of in order to increase people's enjoyment. But no thought or consideration seems to have been given to those of us who derive great enjoyment from the trees themselves. I believe if the plans for the extensive tree felling on the hill were more widely known, there would be much more greater protest from people like myself who value the forest above all else, and whose viewpoints seems to not have been considered throughout the whole process - the emphasis seemingly being entirely on what is best for the hillfort, rather than the woodland. The hillfort is part of Weston's heritage, this is true, but these plans go far beyond conservation to what essentially amounts of full-scale de-wilding of the local area. Given the current Climate Crisis - which North Somerset and Weston town councils have acknowledged - the felling of so many trees is simply unjustifiable and, if it proceeds, will make a mockery of North Somerset's stated intentions of becoming carbon-neutral by 2030. We cannot place the preservation of long-ruined, dead stone ahead of our responsbilities both to the flourishing woodland that exists on the hill currently, and to the broader climate itself. As somebody who feels an incredibly strong emotional attachment to Weston Woods in their entireity, and who is fully committed to tackling the current Climate Crisis in any way possible, I implore you to desist from going ahead with the proposed tree felling and clearances. The plans cannot be reconciled with the council's climate commitments and the loss of one of the most beautiful environments in the local area would be a brutal, devastating blow. I recently read your management plan for Worlebury Fort and would strongly object to the amount of mature tree felling. The proposed plans are excessive and have a significant negative environmental impact. A full Environmental Statement should be produced taking into account mitigation measures for new tree planting. I am deeply concerned about the planned disruption to Weston Woods. I understand there are benefits in terms of tourism and education, but I am very concerned for the current local population. I have been walking, horse riding and dog walking in the woods for the last 54 years. The woods are a wonderful oxygen filled relaxing place for people to take their children dogs and just to walk and to destress. The last time tree felling and woodland management was undertaken, I think about 15 years ago it was incredibly disruptive. Large insurmountable ruts made many of the paths unusable. Vehicles running up and down the road meant people could not relax and just walk with their children an dogs. The peace and beauty of the woods was disrupted. Nowadays the population is urged to relax, enjoy outdoor activities meet up with others to improve health and well being and reduce isolation. The current trees might not all be the right trees, but they provide protection from pollution, oxygen and shade for people walking in the summer. I should like you to consider the health risks to people who currently use the woods on a daily and sometimes twice or three times daily basis.

As a long time resident of Weston Super Mare and frequent user of Worlebury woods I am STRONGLY OPPOSED to the complete felling of any trees which are healthy and not in danger of hurting people. I am in favour however of preserving our history BUT I cannot see how a collection of stones that resemble a builder's yard can be construed as a monument, it was an eyesore when I was a child in the 1980's and I don't suppose it has become any nicer. In a time when the planet is suffering from pollution,trees should be protected not cut down ,although you say the lost trees will be replaced elsewhere, it is just craziness what is being proposed. I was forwarded a Facebook post regarding the potential felling of trees within Weston Woods. After reading the letter which was sent by North Somerset (as this was shared on the post) though I understand the reason(s) of the potential felling it does not appear to show any incentive of replacement and/or what would happen with the trees if this proceeded. I have regularly walked my children up and around this protected area and for many people who have lived in Weston is part of the town’s history and environment. To me I am not an archaeologist and don’t pretend to understand what impact such organic growth may have on the area however, it has been here for some time and although there is a responsibility to protect this site the same should be said about the area and its inhabiting wildlife. It does appear to be a substantial area due to be felled and personally I think there are better and less invasive ways which could be explored first. I am appalled to hear there is to be more tree felling in weston woods. There was much thinning out of the trees a few years ago which resulted in a lot of the wild flowers being trampeled over & never recovering.. I thought we needed to plant more trees not fell them because of globel warming.I am 77yrs old, born in weston & have been walking in weston woods since I was a child. Squirrels are abundant.& my sister in law & my daughter have seen deer among the trees.I cant imagin what will happen to all this wildlife if this treefelling takes place . Please do not let this happen. I really cant understand why you would want to devastate the woods like this It just does not make sense. I am deeply concerned about the proposed plans to remove the trees from this area, I believe you are messing with nature and this would be a terrible shame, it's one of the only areas in Weston that has this type of environment and I cannot see how you can justify this decision. A close friend has just shown me several photograhs of the weston Woods. She mentioned that a large area is being cleared and she gave me your e mail address. My first reaction was I didn't believe her that any trees would be cut down. Looking at the photos I can't believe what's going on. I used to take my children and grand children up in the woods. I have some lovely memories of the walks. I would like to register my objections to any proposals to removal any of the trees. The wildlife is more important. We as humans have cleared too much habitat. It may only be modern wildlife but it is very precious to all of us. We need to be protecting the trees and the wildlife as a priority over anything else. I am sending this email to officially give my support to the proposed tree management work on the hillfort I wish to let you know that I am fully in agreement with the policy that is being proposed for the conservation of this monumental historical site. I have lived on Worlebury since 1964 and back then there were at least 2 woodmen who saw to the maintenance of the woods. They were kept tidy and under control. However, for a long time now there has not been any regular work done up there and the woods are in a sorry state. I have watched the steady coming of undergrowth and the devastation it has done to the hillfort and throughout the woods. As my husband was an historian he said back then how important historically the hillfort site was. However, I am also a person who cares about the environment but do not see how the cutting down of less than 5% of the trees is going to do any harm especially as those trees are non-native to this country and have caused untold damage to the woods and undergrowth in that area. When my children were small we used to have a picnic on the grass at the far end of the fort in a beautiful open space with views on both sides of the hill down to Weston and . I do not think that the fact that it is only 5% of the total woodland area has been emphasised loudly enough. Personally, I would like to see the whole of the woods clear-felled and returned to the upland grass area it originally was many years ago. It would be good to see it like Brean Down or Sand Point as it should be. However, I do not expect that will ever happen especially as we have so many dog owners in the town who are very vociferous. Therefore I support the felling of some trees in the hillfort area and the preservation of that structure. Please do not be swayed by any other arguments to the contrary. At North Worle Forum on Tuesday residents were delighted to hear about the hillfort project and the replacement of trees with open grassland. They gave their full support to this and also to the archaeological work to be done. I have been informed that there are plans for about 5% of Worlebury woods to be destroyed. When considering environmental responsibilities we are now more aware of these days, I find it very concerning that these plans are being suggested. I understand that there is an Iron age fort on this area of land that would be good to preserve, however not to the detrimental effect of the surrounding woodland. I would strongly ask for many environmental factors to be considered in this planning proposal. I find it very hard to believe that it is necessary and essential that almost 5000 trees and many others areas home to a whole range of wildlife need to be destroyed to preserve the Iron age fort. I believe it would be detrimental to the surrounding area to loose this area of woodland. Therefore I believe a revised proposal is necessary, which aims to preserve the woodland and the wildlife that live in it as much as possible. Please consider the environmental impact this proposal would have on the area. I can understand tree management but feel that the proposal put forward is very drastic! Clearing the trees to uncover the stones is good if the ground is then looked after, who will undertake this long term, hopefully not relying on volunteers ? We will end up with brambles overgrown and although this is good for wildlife not acceptable for this area. I am also concerned re the tall grass, what do you class as long grass? Where does tall grass grow on a windswept salty environment? Sand bay, Brean down? Crooks peak, Brent knoll? No!!!! The sky line will change, the loss of trees to westonians is major, especially now when planting trees for the environment is so important. The argument that the woods are man made and only 200 years old is crazy!!! The volunteers have worked hard up at the fort, but I have been concerned re the fires, plus the blue nylon string that has been used to tie branches together that has then become loose and blown over the wood! Tree management is admirable the council have not properly been doing this for years, funding from other means is great but will not be long term, what are the councils plan spend per year for care of the woods please?

I am totally against this proposal, the number of trees that will be lost is ridiculous. Opening up the area around the hill fort will leave it open to the elements, the trees currently provide a certain amount of protection, it will then have to be further protected. It is ridiculous for North Somerset Council to be encouraging us to plant trees in one part of their local newsletter and in the same newsletter telling us that they are going to tear down a large number themselves. Shame on them!! I am very concerned about the environmental impact over North Somerset Council’s plans to fell up to eight hectares of woodlands in Weston Woods! North Somerset Council has submitted an application to the Forestry Commission to fell these mature trees and it concerns me greatly. I understand the reasons behind the decision to fell encroaching trees for the protection of Worlebury Hill Fort but the sheer size of the felling area to be considered is not proportional to the size of the hill fort. It is also not environmentally justifiable to allow hundreds of trees to be felled in this manner and will leave Weston woodlands scarred for future generations. Before attention is brought to North Somerset Council’s rewilding scheme for 2020, which I totally support, I would like to mention that I think new trees should not be seen as replacement for old trees. The new trees should be planted in addition to keeping the mature trees that we already have in our area so that we can, indeed, make a much needed contribution to rewilding areas of North Somerset. As you know, each and every mature tree is home to thousands of various insects, birds and animals and their roots offer an important and natural way to soak up heavy surface rain. By felling so many trees it may increase the risk of flooding and, as we have seen of recent years, this has become a major issue. The felling of this huge volume of trees could potentially, in my opinion, also cause problems regarding landslide above the town because reducing their numbers by so many greatly reduces their ability to soak up extended downpours when heavy rains arrive. I am concerned about the environmental impact of this vast tree destruction and whether it is in keeping with the larger plan of local climate responsibility and therefore object to this application. I presently live in Leewood Road and as a child lived on Worlebury Hill. The woods are very special. Walking in trees is very good for our mental and physical health. Trees also offer many ecological benefits. I read that the plan is to cut 100s of trees down at the location of the hillfort to return the area to a treeless landscape like Brean Down and Sand Point. Is this plan true and if so how many trees do you plan to fell. I am concerned that the hill fort will be used as a way of encouraging tourism into the woods. Weston already provides Brean Down and Sand Point and the beeches for tourists. The woods is mainly used by locals. Too many people in the woods will be ecologically challenging and also ruin the peace and calm. If the hill fort is used as a tourist attraction where will visitors park? I would like to express my concern and objection over the proposed plans to flatten a large section of Worlebury woods. The area you intend on destroying is well loved by my family. My two children thoroughly enjoy exploring this woodland, searching for wildlife, eating berries and looking for the perfect stick! I understand the need to preserve historic monuments but do not see how this can be deemed more important than protecting and preserving the homes of many wild animals who reside there. By flattening the area, I believe the lack of shelter and foliage will result in land similar to that of Sandpoint and Brean down. Exposed to the elements and, although a beautiful view over Bristol Channel, far less attractive or exciting than the landscape that exists today. Please revise these plans by prioritising life as it is today and looking forward, as opposed to focusing on what has been. I am confirming my support for the felling of trees on the Hill Fort. As you know I have anxieties about the chances of getting it done in the time scale outlined and am also very anxious that grazing has not been publicly accepted as the only viable way of controlling the regrowth after felling. Anything else is both economically and ecologically absurd. We are in agreement with the proposal. As members and supporters of “Weston Trees” we fully support the felling of the trees at Worlebury Hill Fort to protect this valued ancient monument. We have expressed our sentiments in the letter below just e-mailed to the Mercury, which please feel free to quote to the Forestry Commission and elsewhere. Dear Sirs, Weston Trees was formed in May 2018 to protect and encourage new planting of trees in Weston’s streets and other public spaces. It may therefore come as a surprise to readers, the undersigned members and supporters of Weston Trees fully support the felling of trees to protect Worlebury Hill Fort ancient monument. This is not the destruction of the Amazonian Forest, nor indeed the destruction of ancient woodlands. The non-native trees were planted 200 years ago by the Lord of the Manor to provide cover for shooting and hunting, not to protect the natural habitat. Scots pine, whitebeam and beech trees will be preserved. The natural habitat is limestone grassland and had been for thousands of years before the planting of the trees. Limestone grassland increases biodiversity and establishes a rarer environment for wildlife. Over 80 varieties of wild flowers were recorded last summer on the central area, which has been cleared now for two years. Limestone grasslands are some of the most plant and insect-rich habitats in the UK. Trees lost should be replaced by planting afresh elsewhere and we are encouraged that North Somerset Council’s first step in their rewilding project is to plant 5,000 trees to help mitigate the effects of climate change. More of the same please. Weston Trees does mourn the loss of trees from our streets and other public places, and our present focus is to map those trees to protect them for the future. If you would like to help in this project please contact us through our Facebook Page. We want the right trees in the right places please, and not destroying our prized ancient monument and natural habitat. The sooner the trees are felled he sooner this superb site will be visible from the town and the views from the site will be fantastic. I would like to support NSC's plan to clear the trees and vegetation so that the hillfort can be seen and appreciated by all I fully support the proposals for the hillfort. At the recent talk given by Mark Bowden of Historic England it was clear how important the site is to our history. It should be restored to grassland, as it was before the trees were planted. Thank you for providing this opportunity to respond to the Council’s proposals for the management of Worlebury Hillfort. I would like to express my support for the proposed developments and to congratulate all who have been involved in working to bring this issue to the point where this important archaeological site might receive the protection that it obviously needs. The management proposals seem very sensible and I was pleased to see under Work Plan Objective 8.2 that provision is envisaged for the ongoing maintenance of the intended new environment. I wish you all every success in this venture. I am writing to express my objection to the unnecessary proposed clearing / felling of trees in Weston Woods around the hill fort that will change the outlook of the woods immeasurably As residents that live on Old Bristol Road, and daily walkers in the woods, we do not agree of the removal of trees in the woods, this serves no purpose to the planet and the iron age fort!! It may be hidden underneath, however removing the oxygen giving trees in order to see it serves no means. The trees do not pose a risk to life and property nearby they are happy growing and providing safety to wildlife in their own environment (The woods is where to trees should be growing, and consuming water to balance the eco-system). We cannot continue to believe in this day and age, it is ok to remove trees from a wood? it is part of the bigger problem the planet faces, please consider the wider environmental impact, of wildlife, flora and the planet. In the current eco-system it is almost unbelievable that this has even been floated as an idea?? I’m writing to explain my disagreement with the plan to fell the trees at Worlebury Camp Hillfort. I really don’t think it is a good idea to go ahead with these proposals for many reasons. Firstly, I was in the woods just yesterday walking my dogs and I walked through the area where you are planning to cut down the trees and there is already a large open space that enables you to see what is left of the hillfort. In my opinion, it is not worth felling trees to save it because it is mainly just piles of rocks that you can see with the trees around. As a fan of history and heritage myself, I understand why one might want to conserve this area but I completely disagree with the plans to cut down the trees. It is just not necessary. I think people should be able to walk through the woods and see the hillfort as it has aged, without the interference that you’re planning. Nature should be allowed to take its course and add to the beauty of the area. I don’t see the ‘risk’ of the trees and vegetation remaining where they are. In addition, after reading your proposals I was wondering how much it is going to cost to complete this project, will the £10,000 be enough? If not, where is the rest of the money going to come from? As well as this, I urge you to think about the people who live nearby. How do you think this project will affect them and their daily lives? Many have lived near this area of the woods for many years and have always seen the hillfort full of trees and plants. If you start clear felling the area it’s going to make their homes feel so different and the area may become a lot busier than it is now which will make it less pleasant to live there. Furthermore, surely cutting down trees will create a lot of noise which can make life stressful when you’re trying to relax at home? From someone who loves Worlebury Woods in all of its beauty, I beg you to consider what you’re doing. I would also like to suggest an alternative way you could increase knowledge and awareness of the area. Instead of cutting down the trees, you could teach more about its history to those who want to know. For example, I’ve had a look at what has written about the hillfort. You could use your pictures and technology to create engaging exhibits that help people to understand what it could’ve looked like. You don’t have to make a tourist attraction out of a historical place - it won’t ever look like what it used to but you can help us to imagine it without removing vital parts of the woods. Some of the trees planted there are hundreds of years old, it would be wrong to get rid of them completely. You can also consider the trees to be part of our heritage as they were planted in the 1800s to create a game reserve, according to Weston Museum. I know this isn’t as far back as the Iron Age, but it was still a while ago which makes them important. Finally, trees don’t just grow overnight and even though you’re claiming they will be planted in other areas to replace the ones you’re getting rid of, that will take a while. You can’t replace hundred year old trees that fast. Habitats will be destroyed, every living thing has grown accustomed to the trees being there and if you get rid of them, it could be detrimental to their wellbeing. Thank you for reading my email. I plead you to at least consider my opinion, as I hope it changes your mind. Please can you also send me any updates on the hillfort. This is to object to North Somerset's Council decision to cut trees in Weston woods Please note my objection to the proposed tree felling in Weston Woods in order to clear the area around the Iron Age hill fort. In a time when increasing numbers of green spaces in the Weston area are being built on for housing, and dealing with the climate emergency should be the main priority both locally and nationally, the decision to clear an area of woodland when it is entirely unnecessary beggars belief. Whilst preserving our history is important it should not be done at the expense of the environment. I oppose the tree felling in Weston woods to expose a hill. Weston Woods is a beautiful location for families, trees, wildlife, ecology, animal, open space for all generations to enjoy. In the digital age, kids not getting enough exercise, concerns over obesity, health matters for all, it’s a place to go, walk, explore, learn, relax and enjoy the fresh air and landscape of Weston we live in. £10,000 for a tree survey it’s disproportionate to the needs of locals for health, schooling, libraries and the services in desperate need of funding. We are in an era of austerity, political unrest with Brexit. We are being told to save for our future, are you applying the same for the benefit of all and the retaining of Wood that have stood for years? Your plans are contry to another North Somerset scheme to plant more trees. In fact in your recent life magazine, I received both arrivals were next to each other. That’s a contradictory strategy / mixed message for North Somerset inhabitants. North Somerset are already depleting trees and Greenland / open spaces with the exponential building of new homes at Locking parklands, Weston Village, Weston Gateway. Trees are being removed and replaced. Trees take years to mature. At Weston Woods these are just being removed and not replaced. This tree felling is Unessesary, not in the local interests, (unessesary to justify exposing a hill where a fort once stood) and the cost, dispute being a grant, is not using North Somerset resources in the best way for the majority of residents. It will change the seafront landscape. I strongly appose this proposal, it’s unnessesary, niche and vandalising the woodland area, depleting trees in Nirth Somerset. We would like to ask you to not cut down the trees in weston woods and instead try to find a different way of finding the fort. I feel obliged to write and lodge my objection to the extent of the tree felling proposed within the 2018-2025 Conservation Management Plan. I find it unfathomable that in a time of accelerated climate change and the drive and need for more trees and woodlands to protect the environment from the affects of climate change that any organisation would be considering the removal of six hectares of woodland. I appreciate the heritage site and the desire to preserve and protect the hillside fort but there is no need to uncover the whole site and leave an open and desolate headland. I strongly feel the future should not be jeopardised to accommodate the past. A portion of the original site could be uncovered and protected without the need for the whole site to be uncovered. I would suggest the area currently uncovered could be continued down the hill to overlook Weston but not continued to the end of the headland. The proposed area has well established and old trees within it and a diversity of wildlife, including nesting birds such as jays and owls. Which will all be disrupted if these proposed plans are continued with. I disagree with the notion that these proposals will benefit the enjoyment of the woodlands, if bleak headlands of shrub and grass are wanted there is Sandbay and Breandown close by. These plans will leave open spaces with no protection from strong winds; rain or strong sunshine. I would suggest they will reduce accessibility not increase it. The open areas will become water logged and muddy without the protection of the tree canopy. I walk in these woods most days and I am yet to meet anyone who spends any time in the fort area which has already been uncovered, all preferring the woodland area. The proposed grasslands will be effective no-go areas for hay fever sufferers or those with related allergies of which is 31% of the population, that is a significant amount to people who will be unable to continue enjoying the beauty of the woods. I ask you to reconsider the scar you intend to leave on the hillside and within the woodland I am writing to express my objections to the proposals to fell a large number of trees in Weston Woods as the site of the ancient hill fort. At a time when we are facing an environmental crisis and when Weston council themselves are carrying out tree planting/re-wilding projects you are planning to fell established woodland. This is madness. Please reconsider the proposals. I have heard much recently on the plans you fell up to 5000 trees in Weston woods! I personally strongly object to this! I am writing to you with my comments on the proposed felling of trees on Worlebury Camp Hillfort. First I would like to say I do understand and appreciate the importance of the hillfort and other heritage sights and maintaing them. I go down to the hillfort nearly everyday and am very interested in its history. However after carefully looking over all the reasons and information for the proposal that's been put out, I have the following concerns. Obviously the main reason listed is to prevent damage to the fort to maintain it, aswell as uncovering it to be enjoyed. I've been going to the fort since I was very young and the rampards, pits etc have always been visible and the surrounding nature seems to protect it more than damage it. With that being said I acknowledge the roots etc would be interfering with the structure somewhat, but felling the trees now will not reverse that and if anything could worsen it. I also feel uncovering it more could pose more of a threat in terms of the vandalism which always been quite a big problem at the fort. Completely exposing it just opens up the opportunity more for people to cause damage to it themselves; as it was, just the other day someone offroading on a motorbike down there! The surrounding trees etc provide shelter from vandalism aswell as harsh weather which could become an issue. In terms of view from the fort, all the key points like sandbay, brean etc are visible from various points throughout the camp and so it isnt really an issue. What could be an issue with this vast clearing is the stumps afterwards, they would ultimately be rather hazardous everywhere. The main issue for me is the threat posed to wildlife. Its been stated its part of the re-wilding policy which is to allow nature to reinstate a more natural environment and habitats to enable wildlife to flourish to help address climate change and losses in biodiversity. Cutting down trees and destroying habitats contradicts that. One of the major concerns at the moment regarding climate change is the fast rate in which we're losing trees as they literally provide us with life, the last thing we want to do right now is cut down any more. I know the intended plan is to convert it to limestone grassland to supposedly improve biodiversity but the glade already provides this along with the which are a very large area of limestone grassland. Not only that, in the original management plan for the woods, it states the highest diversity comes from a diverse woodland with a mix of age trees and shrubs providing lots of wildlife habitats, which will be destroyed if this goes ahead. Destroying habitats means animals lose their homes, a lot of them being very long term residents too. Some may say they can just move into the surrounding woodland, but those places are already inhabited which would lead to overcrowding, then interfering with the delicate ecosystems, ultimately leading to the loss of a lot of wildlife. A tree which had bats nesting in it has already been cut down as part of the project. A long with those, deers, foxes, badgers, a variety of birds including owls and even marsh harriers and others inhabit the woodland here and would be at risk. It's also been said they will target non native species which is reasonable, though the area which they wish to clear fell is largely made up of native species, majorly beech, some aged up to 200 years old, which would be destroyed as some already have as part of this project. Theres no mention of protecting the oak either. How can we be sure the rare whitebeam will be protected when other trees they said would be protected have gone already. Overall I think this felling is not a good idea and will interfere with important life and ecosystems among other things. Thankyou for reading my comments, I'm open to discussing them further if needed. I recently threw a birthday party for my 5 year old and made party bags, to avoid giving out plastic toys we gave each child an english oak tree seed, compost and a fibre pot. What is the point of ordinary people making the effort to have a positive effect on our environment when large organisations continue to make devastating changes to our environment. The plans to fell so many carbon absorbing, animal sheltering, life sustaining trees in Weston woods should be reconsidered. Protecting the trees that are already established in this world and planting more to help balance out the damage we have caused to our environment, should be prioritised above any other desire. What is the point of having a Hillfort visable if there is noone alive to look at it? A climate emergency is not around the corner, it is happening now. We need to do what ever we can to help our environment recover, felling any trees, what ever their origin, for what ever reasons, is not acceptable. Please consider the most basic of needs we have, oxygen, and stop these unnecessary plans. The planet needs more trees not to cut the trees down. I live in New Zealand and our Government is aiming to plant 1 billion trees by 2028. UK can take a lesson from us to save the planet. When I first came to live in Weston-super-Mare 17 years ago, I made sure I visited its important historical places. I went to Uphill to see the old church and the little tower, to the old pier, to Steepholm Island by boat, and to the ancient Worlebury Camp Hillfort in Weston Woods, amongst others. I understand the need to preserve these places and I support their preservation; I get that it will be necessary to fell trees around the Hill Fort, but 21.74 acres? These woods create the most beautiful backdrop to Weston Bay as you walk along the seafront: I have prints at home which show how the hill looked before the early 19th century. It was bare, albeit grassy, like Sand Point and Brean Down, and the fact that the hillfort will be visible for miles around after the felling will not stand comparison with the amazing trees that frame that end of town at the moment. I agree that the hillfort should be preserved for those who wish to visit it, but for the thousands of others who look up and see the luxuriance of the trees against the skyline, it's no contest. First of all we need to protect Worlebury Hill Fort in Weston Woods - correct. What we do not want to do is utterly destroy 8.8 Hectares of woodland. This seems utterly insane with what has happened in the last few weeks. All the flooding because of human action or lack of it. We need more trees in the world not less ! Trees are our very live blood. You only have to walk through woods to breathe pure air, hear the sounds, look at the colours and structure. In an age when mental health issues are very prominent a walk on the woods is peace. How can you bring yourself to be the person who wishes to destroy our planet in this way by signing any letter to authorise this happening. I implore you to reconsider. I would like to express my support for the proposals to remove trees from the hillfort site. As we heard at the meeting at the Museum on the 19th February from Mark Bowden of Historic England, Worlebury hillfort is of significant national importance. It needs protection but is being damaged (and hidden) by trees. This is not a decision that I have taken lightly as I have a lifelong interest in and love of trees, but in the circumstances their removal from the hillfort area is important to help to preserve the archaeological remains. Opening up the site should also stimulate interest in the hillfort and hopefully lead to a wider recognition of its place in history. I just wanted to put in writing my support for the plans to preserve the hillfort. I have seen some backlash against the project on social media and I understand people's aversion to the felling of trees, particularly in the current climate crisis. However, we have a duty to care for and preserve this significant piece of ancient history for our town and future generations. I grew up on the hill not far from the woods and have many fond memories of exploring the area, enjoying both the nature and the historical site. Although it has always been wooded in my lifetime, I am aware that this is not the natural landscape. I support restoring the natural limestone grassland around the fort as it will provide habitat for different types of flora and fauna and any negative impact of tree felling will be offset by the plans to plant 50 000 young trees across North Somerset. I hope the plans will, in addition to protecting the fort from further damage, generate more interest in the site, lead to some amazing views and encourage more visitors. Hopefully, in the near future, we can also excavate and study more of the site and find out more about the people who lived there. I have been reading about the plans to uncover the hill fort in worlebury woods for a while now. And I do understand that this is a unique and historically important find for weston, I think it should be left at it is. We know now, more than ever, the impact that humans are making on the planet and causing of global warming. Now is the time to be preserving the FUTURE and not the past. There is already a considerable amount of the hill fort on view, and with the help of information boards and artists recreation of the site we can see perfectly what it would've looked like. It is never going to look the same as it did in the iron age, I'm sure people would learn a lot more from seeing a small part as it is now, and learning from the information provided. One tree alone can produce enough oxygen for 4 people per day, as well as removing damaging carbon dioxide from the air. We cannot afford to be clearing trees in favour of something that has no positive environmental impact. Once the trees have been felled, I read a statement saying that it would only be maintained if there was budget to do so. So if you are uncovering the site as a historical attraction, it really should be top priority to maintain it to draw people to visit. This doesn't seem to be a prioty, more of a case of doing so if there is any spare money - which there won't be. Please can you reconsider felling trees to uncover this site, we do not need this backwards thinking action in our town. This would be a big mistake and would negatively impact the environment, the wildlife that live there and also the aesthetics of the view of the hillside woods from all over weston. Please do not do this. I would be grateful if you could let me know how I can send this email to the highest person in charge of this project. I object to the proposal to clear cut 8.8 hectares of woodland for the following reasons.. 1. No EIA has been completed for this 8.8hectare clear cut of woodland. By law this should take place. The law should be followed to protect the environment. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/10/contents 2. The council has failed to openly notify and consult with the local residents of the details of the work. The loss of many trees will be significant, many folks here don’t know. They should be told.and be allowed to have their say. The Councillor in a recent interview would not answer the question publically how many trees would go. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus/ 3, The placing of the the proposal on the Forestry Commission Register is a legal requirement. There was no public notification of this to allow for responses from the public. It was done back in 2019, I understand. Should it not be at the same time as the local consultation? https://www.gov.uk/guidance/consultation-and-the-public-registers 4. The cost of the project to the public purse is unknown. 5. The basis of the proposal is an archaeological study. There should be additional study re impact of this proposed work to environment and geology. 6.The work is at odds with the council’s own strategy for CO2 reduction due to the Climate Emergency. Planting new trees only has offset if it’s done in addition to keeping existing trees. New trees may take 25 years to “do” what old trees do on carbon. 7.The council doesnt know if there are any protected species in the woods which may require special protection. A full wildlife assessment has not been done. 8. Erosion and impact of tree removal should be fully evaluated before any deforestation is undertaken.. 9. It won’t look very nice.Every visible tree on from the beach will be removed. The esthetic change and reaction to this has not been checked with residents or visitors. 10. I live on Atlantic road, i only found out about this proposal when someone shared it on a private Facebook group. To date, I feel I have not been consulted or made aware of the tree cutting. This will be the same for many residents of the town who haven't had a letter, or have no Facebook access. It doesn’t exist on the proposals section of the council website. https://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/my-council/communityinvolvement/consultations/have-your- say/ People don’t know they want to cut 8.8hectares of trees. That’s not right. A failure of the Local Council to clearly notify people in Weston on the 8.8hectare clear cut. A failure of the Forestry Commission process, no responses received from 28days on register for or against the proposal, because as far as i can assess, no-one knew it was there. Change the process Ian. Make it fair. Make it Open. So people know about proposals rather than find out by accident. Happy to feedback ideas if helpful!

I am amazed to read that so many trees are to be cut down on Weston Hillside. We are being told all the time that trees are important for the environment and the wildlife and yet the proposal is for so many to be cut down to apparently protect an Iron Age Fort which for many is just a great pile of stones. I think it is time to think again about this misguided act at a time when so many new homes are being built and more green belt is being lost. NO,NO,NO. Please do not fell the trees around the ancient Worlebury Hill Fort. At one end of town the council want to fell hundreds and at the other end plant hundreds in the scheme for a tree for every child born in the area. We all understand how important trees are to our environment both to clean the pollutants and also to stabilize the ground and help prevent landslides and flooding. The trees around the hill fort were planted in Victorian times by children and it seems the Victorians knew more about clean air than the present council. I repeat, both my husband and myself are horrified that such a stupid plan to remove so many trees is being considered and we object strongly. I have seen a type written note regarding North Somerset Council's application for a felling licence for trees in Worlebury/Weston Woods. It says that the application requires consultation with neighbouring residents. I live at 59 South Road, Weston-super-Mare, BS23 2LU so any clearing potentially can affect our property if that whole area of habitat and landscape is changed but I have heard nothing about this clearing until this note was left. Could I register my concern at the felling of 8.8 hectares of trees officially please? I have the following comments and concerns regarding the Council’s application for a felling licence to remove and reduced the existing trees over an area of 8.8 hectares of Weston Woods. I understand the need to protect the Worlebury Hill Fort and would comment that there has been plenty of opportunities over the last 200 years to manage this woodland so as not to damage the Hill Fort. Clearly these opportunities have been missed, resulting to the proposed disproportionate measures. My areas of concern are; 1. The increase in flood risk to properties caused by the lost of woodland. A detailed flood risk assessment is required and measures undertaken to mitigate the increased run-off before the works are undertaken. 2. The loss of habitat for the existing animals & birds. How is this been replaced? 3. The need for the Council to replace and manage a similar area of mixed broadleaved and woodland trees in a different location. 4. The need for a clear manage plan for the future exposed area, including public access and parking. I hope my comment and concerns are considered seriously before any large scale tree felling is undertaken. Please also include these comments and concerns in your consultations to the Forestry Commission. I'm emailing to voice my concern by the planned loss of trees at Worlebury Hill Fort in Weston Woods. The loss of trees will harm the environment. Please reconsider this plan As a local who could conceivably be affected by the proposed mass tree felling operation, I would support any initiative to discourage and prevent this. Please don’t cut down the trees .Weston woods are so special. If the woods had been maintained going back decades ,this situation would not have arisen I have oaks ,ash ,sycamore amongst many other trees in my garden and I think the trees in the woods help to protect them .If the trees are felled I am sure they would suffer . I agree entirely with the reasoning expressed in the note which was put through my door on Wednesday evening 26 The Hill Fort is important,but the loss of 8.8 hectares is excessive and unnecessary . I am writing regarding the proposed felling of trees on Worlebury Camp Hillfort. I have carefully looked over the plans and have the following concerns. My main one being the threat to wildlife and the environment. One of the biggest world issues at the moment is climate change and the impact of on this by ongoing deforestation and the shrinking rainforests. Cutting down trees and destroying habitats is the last thing we want to do. A good woodland provides some of the best habitats for diversity. Whilst I understand in your proposal that you state you would be replacing the wood with a much rarer limestone grassland, there are already large existing areas of limestone grassland in the local area, including Brean Down, Sand Point, Uphill Nature Reserve, Cheddar Gorge and the Mendip Hills. Part of the existing camp is already composed of limestone grassland. Therefore, I do not feel in this instance it would be beneficial to the local environment to lose trees and already established habitats for grassland. Trees are vitally important for purifying our atmosphere in an ever more polluted industrial world. These woods are also home to a wide variety of wildlife including deer badgers, bats and marsh harriers along with many smaller rodents and insects. They are mostly long term residents with well-established habitats, felling would destroy these homes. This will disrupt the delicate balance and ecosystems and would result in the loss of much the current wildlife inhabiting these woods. The plan says native trees will be protected but many have already been cut down! I do not see how with the proposed plan how they would get round that as for the most part the trees on the camp are native. Some of these trees will be up to 200 years old, it would be such a shame to lose them. It is very important to protect our native trees, especially as there are already other factors threatening native species. The area of Weston Woods is used enjoyed and greatly appreciated by a wide range of the local population. It is a favourite of dog walkers, walkers in general, families and families with young children. There are limited opportunities to walk in woodlands in the local area, and as such it is a greatly valued natural environment and would be hugely missed by the community if it were to go – I would go so far as to say it would be a type of bereavement in that local people - a large number of the local population would mourn its loss. I understand the importance of protecting our heritage sights, and that the hillfort is a vital part of our local heritage and must be protected. So I appreciate the importance of maintaining it , but I feel we can do that without destroying so many habitats and homes in the process. A considerable area around the fort has already been cleared to protect the fort itself. The way the hillfort is currently, looks wonderful, you can get some really nice shots of the sunset coming through the trees and shining over the stones. The trees also frame the views out to Sandbay and Brean beautifully. They also protect it. Making it more exposed by felling the woodland would put the fort at higher risk of vandalism and weather erosion. People are also more likely to ride bikes and other vehicles over it too if it's more open. This presents an existing problem as it is. All in all, I feel the hillfort and those established habitats and trees can be protected cohesively so as to not damage these very important ecosystems .It is also very important to preserve this much valued local woodland for local people to continue to enjoy now and generations to come. I am writing regarding the proposed felling of trees on Worlebury Camp Hillfort. I have carefully looked over the plans and have the following concerns. My main one being the threat to wildlife and the environment. One of the biggest world issues at the moment is climate change and the impact of on this by ongoing deforestation and the shrinking rainforests. Cutting down trees and destroying habitats is the last thing we want to do. A good woodland provides some of the best habitats for diversity. Whilst I understand in your proposal that you state you would be replacing the wood with a much rarer limestone grassland, there are already large existing areas of limestone grassland in the local area, including Brean Down, Sand Point, Uphill Nature Reserve, Cheddar Gorge and the Mendip Hills. Part of the existing camp is already composed of limestone grassland. Therefore, I do not feel in this instance it would be beneficial to the local environment to lose trees and already established habitats for grassland. Trees are vitally important for purifying our atmosphere in an ever more polluted industrial world. These woods are also home to a wide variety of wildlife including deer badgers, bats and marsh harriers along with many smaller rodents and insects. They are mostly long term residents with well-established habitats, felling would destroy these homes. This will disrupt the delicate balance and ecosystems and would result in the loss of much the current wildlife inhabiting these woods. The plan says native trees will be protected but many have already been cut down! I do not see how with the proposed plan how they would get round that as for the most part the trees on the camp are native. Some of these trees will be up to 200 years old, it would be such a shame to lose them. It is very important to protect our native trees, especially as there are already other factors threatening native species. The area of Weston Woods is used enjoyed and greatly appreciated by a wide range of the local population. It is a favourite of dog walkers, walkers in general, families and families with young children. There are limited opportunities to walk in woodlands in the local area, and as such it is a greatly valued natural environment and would be hugely missed by the community if it were to go – I would go so far as to say it would be a type of bereavement in that local people - a large number of the local population would mourn its loss. I understand the importance of protecting our heritage sights, and that the hillfort is a vital part of our local heritage and must be protected. So I appreciate the importance of maintaining it , but I feel we can do that without destroying so many habitats and homes in the process. A considerable area around the fort has already been cleared to protect the fort itself. The way the hillfort is currently, looks wonderful, you can get some really nice shots of the sunset coming through the trees and shining over the stones. The trees also frame the views out to Sandbay and Brean beautifully. They also protect it. Making it more exposed by felling the woodland would put the fort at higher risk of vandalism and weather erosion. People are also more likely to ride bikes and other vehicles over it too if it's more open. This presents an existing problem as it is. All in all, I feel the hillfort and those established habitats and trees can be protected cohesively so as to not damage these very important ecosystems .It is also very important to preserve this much valued local woodland for local people to continue to enjoy now and generations to come. I have recently seen online and in the papers that there are plans to fell hundreds of trees, to uncover the hillfort in Weston Woods. I understand your desires to restore and uncover the hillfort as it's part of history, and it is very important to embrace and remember these artifacts. But there are some issues I have with the way in which we are going about unveiling the hillfort. As articles have stated, it's been around 200 years that these forts have been covered up, which obviously means wildlife and nature has inhabited these area. Now removing trees from these areas is going to destroy these animals homes, and cause danger to these animals too. There are many different species of animals and rodents living in these woods, and destroying their homes is going to cause great negative hysteria for all the wildlife in and around the area. My second concern with cutting these trees down is the overwhelmingly fast increase in climate change. Cutting down these trees is only going to worsen this issue, as trees are a vital source in keeping our air and atmosphere purified and clean. Many people walk in the woods everyday, including myself, and the hillfort area is a great place to walk past. The nature surrounding the fort gives it a somewhat nostalgic feeling, and it's a really great sight to see. Removing the nature around it will remove that feeling of peacefulness and calm, especially if all we see is empty land and tree stumps. Now I understand your intentions are to protect the native trees of the area, but from what I've seen there have already been native trees cut down. I would like to reiterate the point that I completely understand why you would want to put emphasis on uncovering these ancient ruins, as it's part of culture and history. But it's 2020, and cutting down hundreds of trees and destroying hundreds of homes for wildlife, is only going to cause backlash. To the Forestry Commission, I object to the proposals made by the local council (North Somerset) to clear 6 hectares of public woodland in Weston Woods, due to the following reasons: I do not feel that there has been a proper consultation. No notices have appeared in the hillfort about one, where dog walkers etc.. who regularly visit the area would see. I have chatted with many walkers in the woods and they didn't know anything about the plans. No notices were put up in the woods entrances. There have been no pictures available so a person can get an idea of how the town's background will look once all the trees are gone. I have been told by the Forestry Commission Woodland Officer that this proposal has already been on the public register for 28 days, how was anyone meant to know it was there? I did not see a notice in the council news to let people know about it. The news articles that I saw didn't give gave a closing date for comments. There wasn't a date in the council's own website article, I did point this out in early February. The only time I saw one was in the council's e-newspaper, this was sent out halfway through the consultation and those without the internet wouldn't have seen it. It seems when talking to people many have unanswered questions about drainage, soil, how it will look, how exposed the area will feel, current wildlife in the area. I haven't seen any reports that address these issues, only ones about the historical element. The proposal has been overshadowed by the major plans for rewilding, however there already is a large area in the hillfort that has limestone grassland. This is forgotten about. I don't feel it is completely necessary to fell all the trees in the area, I can't see from the history reports that they are damaging every part. The Scheduled Monument was put on the 'at risk' registry due to vandalism, not tree root damage. I would rather there was a much better consultation on this proposal and maybe a compromise could be reached. The volunteers I see up in the hillfort every week have worked so hard to maintain the area and the council has worked hard trying to encourage the public to be interested in history. I am impressed with their efforts. Can't there be a different way forward than to cut all the trees down?

I am against your proposal of tree felling within Worlebury Camp Hillfort for the following reasons: Contribution to climate change- we need more trees not less exacerbated by the current practice of burning. Keep Worlebury and plant the suggested 25 hectares of woodland and 40 of grassland Weston could become the pioneer in combatting climate change! Loss of well established habitat and wildlife Loss of a cherished amenity for the local and wider community including walkers, children, dog walkers Loss of an existing stunning landscape with Weston being nestled between two wooded hills themselves embraced by Sand Point and Brean I heard that you are proposing to apply weed killer. If this is the case, not only this will further eradicate the existing wildlife but also pose a health risk to people and dogs. The fact that the visitor discovers the pits and fort while in the woods makes it a hidden gem and brings a different dynamic to the experience. A characteristic that could be explored rather than stifled. The monument is not a tower like , and thus experienced very differently. I hope you can appreciate these points. Please use this email address to keep me updated on this matter I'm writing as a resident who lives on the same hillside as Worlebury woods. I'm against the proposed tree-felling for the following reasons: As a long-standing resident, I've loved the hillside woods framing the town for many years. I don't want to see a hole in it! I have memories from my childhood and beyond of walking through the woods and out onto the Hill Fort, often in sunshine. When I've done this recently, it's been the same: the area is clear of trees, and more so than when I was a child. Why then are so many more trees to be felled? I don't see how this will make any difference to the Hill Fort area, except that the sea may be visible from there. Is it better to have a good view from the hill, or a good view from the town? I think the clearing of the whole Hill Fort area will create a painful scar in the view from the town. The North Somerset Council declaration of a climate emergency must surely have an affect on decision-making in this case. The loss of so many mature trees must ramp up our carbon footprint. The planting of other very young trees in the North Somerset area, whilst to be welcomed, will not compensate for this for a very long time. There has been an archaeological survey of the site. Understandably, the archaeologist was solely concerned with the Hill Fort archaeology itself. Therefore, naturally, an Ecological survey was also to be carried out. I can't find the result of this survey. If it has taken place, I'd be grateful if you could send me a link to the report. If there hasn't yet been one, please could you ask why, and arrange for one to happen? I understand that 'restoring' limestone grassland is not easy, as the area is covered with scrub. Could I refer you to the Iron Age site at Goblin Combe, which was cleared of trees and scrub some years ago? This has now returned to scrub (not grassland) with little sign of the archaeological site. If our trees are removed, this land will also return to scrub unless it is constantly cropped. I believe goats could be deployed to do this, although they will need somehow to be prevented from wandering away from their place of work! However, I understand that this is possible and, if it could happen, grassland would be good for biodiversity in the area. This is why we need an Ecological survey to advise and cost the project. Without an Ecological survey, this project should go no further. I am against your proposal of felling trees within Worlebury hill. Trees have already been cut which is fair enough. But the proposal is unbelievable in this day in age when we need more wilderness, nature and woodland. This site is one of the few havens which harbour a dwindling wildlife population. And all this with climate change in the background! We wish to formally register our objections to the proposed removal of a large area of trees in the vicinity of the hillfort, Weston Woods. As lifetime residents of Weston (South Ward) we object to the Council's lack of transpency and consultation of Weston residents regarding removal of such large acreage of trees near the hillfort. We believe that the Council has failed in its duty of responsibility towards the council tax payers in this town because this proposal will potentially have a huge impact on the residents of the hillside and the town as a whole. "Climate change" is the greatest concern today and we have all experienced the excessive storms, winds and rain not known 20 years ago. The environmental impact on the climate, of removing such a large number of mature trees, will have such a knock on effect that we do not feel the Council has fully taken into consideration. 1. Rewilding by planting immature trees elsewhere cannot justify removing all these mature trees in this area as they will take many years to reach maturity and cannot counter- balance the detriment to the environment. 2. It cannot be possible to truly assess the effect of removing these mature trees re: soil erosion potential flooding potential landslides damage to nearby properties, now exposed to the storms and winds environmental impact on nearby properties eg higher heating bills due to that exposure and more effects on climate change 3. The severe impact on the existing biodiversity of the flora and fauna in the hillfort area. Can we truly believe that we know exactly how to return the area to the "original" biodiversity and land conditions. We believe we are representative of the opinion of may fellow tax payers in Weston and would be grateful if you will give our objections careful consideration when making your final decision I am writing to express my disbelief at what is being proposed with regards to the woods around Worlebury Camp Hill Fort. We back onto this part of the woods and are most definitely against this work. I can understand some thinning but to return the hill to its barren state is beyond ridiculous at this moment in time. Weston has been protected by this woodland from harsh weather and the trees themselves hold the ground together and our concern is that heavy rain fall is just going to rush down off this very steep part of the hill destroying all in its path. During this time of horrendous flooding it grieves me to think anyone would consider this to be a good idea. This woodland is part of the towns architecture how odd is the town going to look without its mantle of trees at the end of the hill. I believe most people would enjoy the trees rather than a pile of rocks. The main part has been cleared and I cannot see why anyone would wish more to be uncovered it’s hardly Stonehenge in its structure. The threat of invasion has long past and the victorians in their last their wisdom decided to plant a beautiful wood for us all (adults ,children and animals) of tame and wild varieties to enjoy. Please see sense and temper this decision. I wish to object to the application to fell 6 hectares of woodland. I strongly feel this will: • leave a bleak and barren headland • offer no protection to walkers from the weather • scar the landscape for very little purpose •and, mostly importantly, be an environmental disaster. It is understood by all that to attempt to counteract the damage of climate change more woodlands and trees are needed and as such this scheme is fool hardy to say the least. I feel strongly that the future should not be jeopardised to accommodate the past. I have only just found out that the council has appleid for a felling license to clear more than 8 hectares of trees in Weston woods and I am contacting to to re-consider this action. While I understand the desire to uncover the hill fort as a historic place, I feel that the mass denuding of the hilltop is unwarranted. The current area of the fort that has had most of the trees removed is not well managed and is in danger of becoming completely overgrown again. I note that if the felling license is granted that the initial work and subsequent maintenance will depend on additional funding which cannot be guaranteed and I doubt that anything less than a legion of volunteers will cope with the battle against nature. At most I would suggest that a much smaller area is felled and returned to limestone grassland before going for the full fort.