9.20 Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5 Volume Planning Act 2008

A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5 .0 9 9.20 Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5 Volume Planning Act 2008

April 2019

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Infrastructure Planning

Planning Act 2008

A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme

Development Consent Order 201[X ]

Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Regulation Number: Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010036 Reference Application Document Reference 9.20

Author: A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme: Highways England Project Team

Version Date Status of Version Rev A April 2019 Deadline 5 submission to the Planning Inspectorate.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Table of Contents Introduction 4 Action Points 5 Action Point 6 5 Action Point 8 7 Action Point 10 8 Action Point 12 8 Action Point 15 9 Action Point 16 9 Action Point 17 9 Action Point 20 10 Action Point 26 12 Action Point 33 12 Action Point 35 13 Action Point 36 13 Action Point 37 13 Action Point 39 13 Action Point 43 13 Appendix A – Signage Strategy Note 14 Appendix B – Signage Strategy Drawings 21

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Introduction 1.1.1 This report provides the Applicant’s responses to the Hearing Actions Points associated with Deadline 5 of the Development Consent Order (DCO) Examination for the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme (‘the scheme’).

1.1.2 Each Action Point relates to the table of action points issued by The Planning Inspectorate (EV-007) following the issues specific hearings (ISH), open floor hearings, and compulsory acquisition hearings held between Tuesday 26 February and Friday 1 March 2019. Responses to each of the Action Points are contained within Chapter 2 of this report. The numbering adopted in Chapter 3 corresponds to the numbering in the Action Points issued by the Examining Authority.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 4 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Action Points

Action Point 6

Action Point 6 requests: Mitigation of impact on “higher” rights on PRoW network where requests current with SCC on assumption such rights exist. Introduction There are currently 4 applications to modify the Definitive Map and Statement registered on Somerset County Council’s Rights of Way portal (https://roam.somerset.gov.uk/roam/map) in the vicinity of the scheme. These are: · MOD 863: An application to upgrade public right of way ref Y30/31 (otherwise known as Higher Farm Lane) from public footpath to Byway Open to All Traffic (BOAT). · MOD 861: An application to upgrade public right of way ref Y30/28 (otherwise known as Eastmead Lane) from bridleway to Restricted Byway. · MOD 851: An application to upgrade public rights of way refs WN27/4 and WN23/11 from public footpath to bridleway. · MOD 859: An application to upgrade public rights of way refs WN23/12 and WN23/28 from public footpath to bridleway. The Applicant responded at D4 on the discussion regarding legal mechanisms available to amend the classes of users of highways (REP4-020 at 2.4). It is not practical in the DCO to include multiple contingent status for these rights of way and any determination of higher rights after grant of the DCO should be addressed in the normal process. This response accordingly only addresses the physical aspects of the ways. An assessment of the potential impact on each of these orders is given below. In making this assessment, the following desirable widths for newly created rights of way have been used: · 1.5 metres for public footpaths. · 2.5 metres for bridleways. · 3 metres for restricted byways. · 5 metres for byways open to all traffic.

MOD 863 This proposed modification was registered on 14 November 2018. Higher Farm Lane follows a north-south direction from Podimore village, crossing the existing A303 dual carriageway on an existing overbridge. Public Right of Way (PRoW) reference Y30/31 is shown on sheet 1 of the Rights of Way and Access Plans (REP3-002). Public right of way reference Y30/31 is situated to the west of the scheme limits and no work is proposed to it as part of the scheme. The proposed modification reference 863 would have no impact on the physical proposals within the DCO application.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 5 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

MOD 861 This proposed modification was registered on the 29 October 2018. Eastmead Lane runs in a north-south direction between the A303 and Cary Fitzpaine. The southern end of Eastmead Lane, at its junction with the A303, will be severed by the proposed dual carriageway and it is not proposed to reconnect this RoW to the new A303 verge. The scheme proposals are therefore for the southern end of Eastmead Lane to be connected to proposed Tracks 3 and 2 which lead eastwards to the proposed Downhead Lane. The existing PRoW and new route along Tracks 3 and 2 are shown on Sheets 1 and 2 of the Rights of Way and Access Plans (HE551507-MMSJV-LSI-000-DR-UU-2042, Revision C03 and HE551507-MMSJV-LSI-000-DR-UU-2042, Revision C03, submitted as part of Deadline 5). The proposed status of the new PRoW along Tracks 3 and 2 is bridleway. However, these tracks are also proposed for vehicular use by adjacent land-owners and are therefore 4 metres wide – more than is necessary for bridleway status. The gradients of Tracks 3 and 2 is relatively flat, and generally less than 3%. The maximum gradient reaches 5.8% for approximately 100 metres, reflecting the local topography. The surface of the tracks will be level and suitable for occasional vehicular use and would therefore be accessible for equestrians and carriages. If Eastmead Lane is upgraded to Restricted Byway status then Tracks 3 and 2 would need the same designation in order to ensure the Restricted Byway status continues beyond the southern limit of Eastmead Lane and onwards to Downhead Lane. This would require Tracks 3 and 2 to be at least 3 metres wide. Draft proposals for gates, gaps and stiles have been prepared. These may need to be amended to reflect dedication as a restricted byway rather than bridleway. However, these details are not scheduled in the draft DCO. The tracks, as proposed, are wide enough and so the proposed modification reference 861 would have no impact on the physical proposals within the DCO application. MOD 851 This proposed modification was registered on the 9 May 2017. The 2 footpaths in question pass over Sparkford Hill, between the A359 and the A303, and are shown on Sheet 4 of the Rights of Way and Access Plans (HE551507-MMSJV-LSI-000-DR-UU-2045, Revision C02, submitted as part of Deadline 5). The A303 and A359 are being retained as public highways at the point where they connect to the 2 PRoW, and the DCO scheme does not include any work to the rights of way. As such the proposed modification 851 would have no impact on the physical proposals within the DCO application. MOD 859 This proposed application was registered on the 6 April 2018. The 2 footpaths in question cross Hazlegrove House Registered Park and Garden. WN23/12 is severed by the proposed scheme and as such a diversion is proposed in Schedule 4 of the draft DCO and the Rights of Way and Access Plans (REP3- 002). WN23/38 is physically unaffected by the scheme proposals. These 2 existing RoW are shown on Sheet 4 of the Rights of Way and Access Plans

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 6 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

(REP3-002). The extent over which WN23/12 is affected and the proposed diversion route is also shown on Sheet 4 of the Rights of Way and Access Plans (REP3-002) and is in Schedule 4 of the draft DCO. The proposed diversion for WN23/12 is scheduled along the route indicated in Table 2.1 below. The width provided in the DCO scheme is also scheduled below. The proposed widths are equal to or greater than the desirable widths for bridleways. The gradient of this route is undulating and generally greater than 6%. The maximum gradient reaches 13% at one section through the Registered Park and Gardens, reflecting the local topography. These gradients are considered appropriate for equestrian use. The surface of the route will be level and an appropriate surface could be applied at detail design stage depending on whether equestrian use is anticipated. Draft proposals for gates, gaps and stiles have been prepared. These may need to be amended to reflect equestrian use if the route is dedicated as a bridleway rather than footpath. However, these details are not scheduled in the draft DCO. The proposed modification 859 would have no impact on the physical proposals within the DCO application. The Applicant notes that while it has provided the information requested it does not accept in principle that it is appropriate for this scheme to be required to address claims of higher rights where these have and may not ever be found to exist. In this case the Applicant is being treated differently from all other landowners who are not required to manage their land in order to cater for rights which are not established. Given that these rights are not currently established, may take some years to be determined and may ultimately be found not to exist at all it is disproportionate to seek to require the Applicant to cater for these should these be found now rather than responding as any other landowner would have to in the future. Table 2.1: Proposed diversion for WN/23/12 Link Width allowed for in the DCO BJ-BI 4m allowed for in the verge of Former A303 (West of Hazlegrove Roundabout). BI-BH 3.5m allowed for between adjacent retained vegetation. BH-BG 4m allowed for in the verge of Camel Hill Link. BG-BF Not applicable – road crossing. BF-BM 4m allowed for in the verge of Camel Hill Link. BM-BN 2.5m allowed for in the verge of the Hazlegrove School Access. BN-BO 3.5m allowed for between adjacent retained vegetation and proposed vegetation / drainage ditch. BO-BP 3.5m allowed for between adjacent retained vegetation and proposed vegetation / drainage ditch.

Action Point 8

Action Point 8 requests: Report discussions between parties on potential design changes on road passing Camel Hill Services and other proposed cul- de-sacs. There have been ongoing discussions with Somerset County Council regarding the potential design changes on the road passing Camel Hill Services and other proposed cul-de-sacs. The Applicant is considering proposals which could reduce the likelihood of the road being used at

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 7 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

excessive speeds. The County Council has not made any suggestions of design measures to address any other concern. To date, no proposals have been agreed.

Action Point 10

Action Point 10 requests: Provide updated OEMP. An update to the Outline Environmental Management Plan (OEMP) has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (document reference 6.7, Volume 6, Revision A).

Action Point 12

Action Point 12 requests: Drawing showing OS Base, Proposal and Parish Council proposal on single drawings. As noted by the Applicant in the hearing sessions in February 2019, the Applicant objects to the Parish Councils’ layout sketch for Hazlegrove junction being referred to as an "alternative" design. It is a cursory sketch, nothing more. It does not account for topography, it does not take account of the need for mitigation, it does not take account of the land take required to deliver landscaping, mitigation, drainage and ancillary features and it has not been subjected to any engineering, traffic or environmental assessment. In contrast, the proposal before the Examining Authority has been subject to an iterative design, site investigation, extensive consultation and assessment. The sketch layout: · is 2D, so has no earthworks, and will inevitably therefore look smaller in plan. · is 2D and is therefore entirely untested from an engineering point of view. The levels in this area require careful design to be undertaken. Due to the layout, it is possible retaining solutions may be required. If retaining solutions were required, costs would increase and the visual effect on the RPG could be worse. · even when taken at face value, has more of the junction element within the more sensitive part of the RPG. · has not been assessed environmentally, and may in particular require lighting, particularly due to the tight radii used which would result in further impact on the RPG; this would have particular impacts on the landscape character and visual setting. · proposes 2 underpasses, compared to one in the Application scheme. · has not been assessed through traffic modelling, making any claims relating to traffic issues entirely speculative. The Parish Councils’ proposal is not an alternative within the meaning of that term set out in the case law. The Applicant is concerned not only at the Examining Authority’s continuing use of the term, but that the requests to the Applicant to address it give undue

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 8 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

weight and credence to this layout sketch to the detriment of the proposal actually before the Examination. The Applicant is the strategic highway authority. It has carefully assessed the options for design in this location over a number of years. It has arrived at the Hazlegrove junction design through an iterative process of consideration of the various and competing constraints. That process is set out in detail in the Hazlegrove Junction topic paper (REP2-005). As has been previously noted by the Applicant, the Parish Councils’ submission ultimately amounts, even if unintentionally, only to an objection to the scheme setting out that they consider it should be refused on the basis of design. If the Parish Councils' wish to challenge the iterative design process set out in the topic paper they are entitled to do so, but simply putting forward a sketch plan provides no meaningful critique at all. Accordingly, in addition to the fully set out explanation of how the Applicant reached the proposed design and why it responds to the various constraints on this location (as set out in the Hazlegrove Junction topic paper, REP2- 005), the Applicant again submits that the Parish Council's sketch layout is simply not a matter before the Examining Authority. In the light of these points, the Applicant declines to provide the overlay drawing requested by the Examining Authority at Action point 12. The Applicant considers that such an overlay would be fundamentally misleading and would not assist in the determination of the proposal currently before the Examining Authority. A meaningful comparison could only be made if substantial design and assessment work, taking many months, were carried out by the Applicant. The Applicant has no obligation to design alternatives to its scheme during an Examination at the request of an Examining Authority. Action Point 15

Action Point 15 requests: Route map for list of mitigations set out in ES to be included in OEMP. A route map has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (document reference 9.21, Volume 9, Revision A).

Action Point 16

Action Point 16 requests: Potential to avoid loss of veteran tree for school access route. Discussions with Historic England and South Somerset District Council regarding the potential to avoid the loss of one veteran tree currently lost as a result of the proposed school access track are ongoing, and an updated position will be provided as part of Deadline 6.

Action Point 17

Action Point 17 requests: Statement of Intent on further action, if any, in relation to listed milestone.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 9 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

The Applicant notes that a response to Action Point 17 is required by South Somerset District Council by Deadline 5.

Action Point 20

Action Point 20 requests: Provide calculations for traffic figures for summer peak and weekend together with implications for noise levels. A noise model has been constructed using traffic data for summer peak weekends. Table 2.2 below shows all receptors that are subject to a moderate or major impact in the short-term based on LA10,18hr. It is also noted that the short-term noise increase for receptors on Sparkford High Street ranges from 2.0 to 2.2 dB (classified as minor in DMRB). Table 2.2: Summer peak traffic impact for receptors with ST moderate or major impact Receptor Summer Peak ST Day Impact [dB] 1 Eyewell Cottages, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PD 3.4 mod 1 Manor Farm Cottage, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.0 mod 1 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 3.6 mod 1 Vale Farm Cottages, Vale Lane, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PL 3.0 mod 2 Eyewell Cottages, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PD 3.4 mod 2 Manor Farm Cottage, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.0 mod 2 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.7 mod 2 Vale Farm Cottages, Vale Lane, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PL 3.0 mod 3 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 3.9 mod 4 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.1 mod 5 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.4 mod 6 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.5 mod Annis Hill Farm, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.7 mod Applecroft, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PB 3.6 mod Camel Hill House, Vale Lane, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PL 3.1 mod Downhead Manor Farm, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.0 mod Eyewell House, Traits Lane, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PJ 3.7 mod Fairfield Fairfield, Howell Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7QX 3.2 mod Glebe Barn, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.3 mod Glebe Farm Cottage, Downhead Road, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.3 mod Glebe Farm, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 4.5 mod Hayloft Camel Hill Farm, Conegar Corner, Gason Lane, Queen Camel, 3.3 mod Yeovil, BA22 7PL Hendersons Cottage, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 4.3 mod Parsons Steeple, Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.1 mod Steeple Cottage, Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF 4.3 mod The Eyewell Bungalow, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PB 3.5 mod The Nook, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PD 3.0 mod The Spinney, Plowage Lane, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RH 7.2 maj Upover, Downhead Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG 3.9 mod Wales Dairy, Blackwell Road, Queen Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7PB 3.5 mod

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 10 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Receptor Summer Peak ST Day Impact [dB] Windhover, Howell Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7QX 3.0 mod The criteria used for significance of noise impacts and for the specification of LOAEL and SOAEL in Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration of the Environmental Statement (APP-048) are not directly applicable to summer peak traffic noise because they correspond to annual averages when considering the effects on health and quality of life. However, consideration may still be given to the implications of these summer peak noise increases. Some 11 of the receptors listed in the table above were also subject to moderate or major increases based on AAWT traffic as set out in Table 11.39 of Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration of the Environmental Statement (APP-048). The summer peak short-term traffic increase for all other receptors in Table 2.2 above is in the lower half of the moderate band and considered not to be significant due to the relative frequency of summer peak days compared with annual averages. Table 2.3 below shows the short- term impact based on AAWT for the receptors in Table 11.39 of Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration of the Environmental Statement (APP-048) and then shows the summer peak short-term impact as a change in noise level and classification as mod for moderate or maj for major, together with the daytime summer peak level as a façade level dB LAeq,16hr. This is compared with the AAWT LOAEL, which although not strictly applicable to summer peak levels as it is based on annual average values, provides context to the noise levels. Negative values imply that the summer peak level with the scheme is below the annual average LOAEL. Finally, Table 2.3 shows the noise impact in the long-term as a change in level and a classification where mod is moderate and min is minor. Table2.3: Summer peak traffic impact for receptors listed in Table 11.39 of APP-048 Receptor AAWT Summer Summer Summer Summer ST Day Peak ST Peak DS peak Peak LT Impact Day level [dB] exceedance Day [dB] Impact of AAWT Impact [dB] LOAEL [dB] [dB] 2 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, 3.6 mod 4.7 mod 52.1 -0.4 5.2 mod BA22 7RF 4 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, 3.2 mod 4.1 mod 50.6 -1.9 4.6 min BA22 7RF 5 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, 3.4 mod 4.4 mod 50.9 -1.6 4.9 min BA22 7RF 6 Steart Hill, West Camel, Yeovil, 3.4 mod 4.5 mod 50.2 -2.3 5.0 mod BA22 7RF Annis Hill Farm, Downhead Road, 3.0 mod 3.7 mod 56.6 4.1 4.2 min West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG Glebe Farm, Downhead Road, 3.6 mod 4.5 mod 51.8 -0.7 4.9 min West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG Hendersons Cottage, Downhead 3.4 mod 4.3 mod 51.5 -1.0 4.7 min Road, West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG Parsons Steeple, Steart Hill, West 3.0 mod 4.1 mod 48.5 -4.0 4.6 min Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF Steeple Cottage, Steart Hill, West 3.3 mod 4.3 mod 49.7 -2.8 4.8 min Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RF

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 11 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Receptor AAWT Summer Summer Summer Summer ST Day Peak ST Peak DS peak Peak LT Impact Day level [dB] exceedance Day [dB] Impact of AAWT Impact [dB] LOAEL [dB] [dB] The Spinney, Plowage Lane, 6.6 maj 7.2 maj 61.6 9.1 7.7 mod West Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RH Upover, Downhead Road, West 3.1 mod 3.9 mod 49.8 -2.7 4.4 min Camel, Yeovil, BA22 7RG

It will be noted that The Spinney is the only receptor subject to a major impact and this has already been described in paragraph 11.10.67 of Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration of the Environmental Statement (APP-048) as subject to significant adverse effect for which secondary glazing and acoustics trickle vents has been offered. Annis Hill Farm discussed in paragraph 11.10.66 of Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration of the Environmental Statement (APP-048) is the only other receptor in the table where the summer peak traffic exceeds the annual average LOAEL. As for the Spinney, the impact is considered to be significant and secondary glazing and acoustics trickle events has been offered to offset the noise increases. As the summer peak impact, with the exception of the Spinney and Annis Hill Farm is negligible, minor or in the lower half of moderate classification band, or when in the upper half of moderate classification band the predicted noise level is below the annual average LOAEL, all summer peak impacts are considered not to be significant.

Action Point 26

Action Point 26 requests: Statement of Common Ground between Applicant and Long Hazel Park covering points in Annexe A to Rule 8 letter. An updated Statement of Common Ground between Long Hazel Park and the Applicant was submitted as part of Deadline 4 (REP4-016). An updated version of this Statement of Common Ground between Long Hazel Park and the Applicant (document reference 8.18, Volume 8, Revision 2) has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission.

Action Point 33

Action Point 33 requests: Submit a joint note confirming latest position regarding definition of start of scheme. The Applicant awaits comments from the Councils on the responses to their comments and revisions to the DCO which have been proposed. In particular, the District Council noted that part of its concern related to the need for supervision of ecological effects of some of the items excluded from commencement. The Applicant has confirmed that it is intended to have such supervision and has proposed an amendment to Requirement 10 to clarify that. Comments on that proposal are awaited.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 12 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Action Point 35

Action Point 35 requests: Update of discussions on Article 12 of dDCO Application of New Roads and Street Works Act 1991. A revised version of the dDCO to address this action point has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (revision 0.4, 3.1, Volume 3).

Action Point 36

Action Point 36 requests: Clarification of maintenance of access tracks to ponds under Article 13 of dDCO. A revised version of the dDCO to address this action point has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (revision 0.4, 3.1, Volume 3).

Action Point 37

Action Point 37 requests: Confirmation that Article 15 of dDCO would refer to “highway”. A revised version of the dDCO to address this action point has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (revision 0.4, 3.1, Volume 3).

Action Point 39

Action Point 39 requests: Clarification of mechanism for protective works in the event a listed building is affected. The Applicant notes that by virtue of section 33 of the Planning Act 2008 no listed building consent is required for works undertaken under a DCO. In order to specify such works and to allow an opportunity for appropriate consultation, the Applicant has proposed an addition to Requirement 12 so that where works would permanently affect any listed feature, those works would require consultation with Historic England before they could be approved by the Secretary of State. A revised version of the dDCO to address this action point has been submitted as part of the Deadline 5 submission (revision 0.4, 3.1, Volume 3).

Action Point 43

Action Point 43 requests: Confirmation of how Signage Strategy is to be delivered under the dDCO. The signage strategy is outlined as a note included within Appendix A of this report and supporting drawings are contained within Appendix B of this report.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 13 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Appendix A – Signage Strategy Note Scheme description – in the context of signage

The A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme (hereafter referred to as ‘the scheme”) involves the upgrade of a short section of A303 from single to dual carriageway. The new dual carriageway follows the line of the existing carriageway very closely. Although there are a small number of exceptions, the scheme involves the modification of the local road network on a very local level only. Journeys between points outside of the scheme limits will generally still enter and leave the scheme limits along the same roads after completion of the scheme as they currently do, although the exact journey within the scheme limits may be altered. The signage strategy that has been developed reflects this. Signage Principles The following key principles will be applied to all signage on the scheme. · All signage must comply with the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions and the Traffic Signs Manual (available on the Department for Transport’s publications website). · The signage strategy will seek to avoid unnecessary visual clutter and distractions to drivers. · Primary route destinations as listed in Chapter 2 of the Traffic Signs Manual (available on the Department for Transport’s publications website) will be signed. · Non-primary and local destination signage will be rationalised on the A303 however signage on local roads will be maintained. · Authorised tourist signage will be replaced as appropriate to direct drivers to use the most appropriate route to attractions. · Informal signs (i.e. those for which no highway authority consent has been given) erected by landowners or business owners in the highway verge will not be replaced. · Signs on private land which do not form part of the formal highway signage will not be replaced as part of the scheme. Existing signage

Existing destination signage at the Hazlegrove, Camel Hill, Canegore Corner, Plowage and Camel Cross junctions is shown in Figures A.1 to A.3 of this note. This also includes some details of the eastbound A303 signage at the Podimore Roundabout which lies just to the west of the scheme limits.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 14 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Proposed signage1

The proposed signage strategy described in this note is indicatively illustrated in the following 4 drawings contained within Appendix B of this report: · HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0206: Tourist Signage Strategy · HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0212: Primary Route Signage Strategy · HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0213: Non-Primary Route Signage Strategy · HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0214: Local Destination Signage Strategy These drawings trace the course of each signed destination as it passes through the scheme. It may be necessary to rationalise this strategy during the detail design of sign face layouts. Where rationalisation is necessary or desirable, the local highway authority will be consulted on the proposals.

Primary route destinations

Drawing HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0212 (Appendix B of this report) contains details of the signage strategy for primary route destinations. The primary route destinations that are currently signed along the existing A303 in the vicinity of the scheme are London, Andover, Exeter, Honiton, Yeovil, Taunton and Frome. London and Andover are currently signed as eastbound ‘through’ destinations, and Honiton, Exeter and Yeovil are signed as westbound ‘through’ destinations. This is maintained in the proposed strategy. In addition Frome is currently sign-posted from the A359 northbound approach to the Hazlegrove Roundabout and so this has been incorporated into the proposed signage strategy from that approach only. Taunton is signed from the westbound approach to the Podimore Roundabout. Technically therefore this is outside the limits of the works although the current signage strategy shows this being signed at the proposed Camel Cross junction. This may be subject to design rationalisation.

1 It should be noted that existing signage that currently refers incorrectly to ‘Hazelgrove’ will be amended by Highways England’s operations team separate from the scheme during routine maintenance checks. Proposed signage as part of the scheme will refer to the correct spelling of ‘Hazlegrove’.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 15 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Non-Primary and Local destinations

The non-primary and local destination signage strategy is shown in drawings HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR-CH-0213 and 0214 (Appendix B of this report). The existing signage at the Hazlegrove and Camel Hill junctions is assimilated into the proposed strategy for the Hazlegrove junction, and the existing signage at the Canegore Corner, Plowage and Camel Cross junctions is assimilated into the proposed strategy for the Downhead (eastbound) and Camel Cross (westbound) junctions. Hazlegrove junction In general, destinations that are currently signed at the existing roundabout are assimilated into the signage strategy for the proposed junction. However, due to the fact that this junction will be grade separated, the signage has been rationalised such that not all destinations will be included on signage at the diverges from the main A303 carriageway. Some local destinations will therefore only be signed on the immediate approach to the retained Hazlegrove roundabout. Camel Cross and Downhead Junction In general, destinations that are currently signed at the existing Camel Cross, Plowage and Canegore Corner junctions are assimilated into the signage strategy for the proposed Camel Cross (westbound) and Downhead (eastbound) junctions. Podimore will be introduced as a ‘through’ destination for westbound traffic approaching the Camel Cross junction in order to intercept traffic that may otherwise be expecting to diverge at the westbound exit slip road which is being stopped up as part of the scheme. Tourist signage

The tourist signage strategy is shown in drawing HE551507-MMSJV-000-HGN-DR- CH-0206 (Appendix B of this report). The destinations included in the strategy are the Fleet Air Arm Museum, Motor Museum and Long Hazel Camp Ground. Fleet Air Arm Museum The Fleet Air Arm Museum is currently signed along the A303 eastbound from as far as Junction 25 of the M5. The museum is also signed westbound from the existing Hazlegrove junction, including the A359 northbound approach to the roundabout. The signage strategy reflects this, providing signage from the A303 eastbound at Downhead and the A303 westbound at Camel Cross. The signage from the A359 northbound approach to Hazlegrove is also maintained, although in order to rationalise signage at the westbound approach the museum is not signed on the A303 westbound approach to Hazlegrove.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 16 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Responses to Action Points for Deadline 5

Motor Museum (Haynes International Motor Museum) Haynes International Motor Museum (signed as ‘Motor Museum’) is currently signed from the B3151 approach to Camel Cross and the A359 northbound approach to Hazlegrove. This is maintained in the proposed strategy. The motor museum is also currently signed on the A303 westbound approach to the Hazlegrove junction. However this has been removed from the proposed strategy in order to rationalise signage on the nearside westbound verge, on reflection of the fact the westbound drivers are actually directed to leave the A303 at the previous junction (South Cadbury). Long Hazel Campground The Long Hazel Campground appears to have an advance sign on the A303 eastbound and westbound approaches to the Hazlegrove Roundabout, and on the A359 exit from the roundabout itself. The signs on the existing A303 approach will not be retained although the campground will be signed from the Hazlegrove roundabout onwards. Other destinations No other local facilities have been accommodated within the proposed signage strategy as they do not currently benefit from authorised signage on the existing network. Proprietors of nearby facilities are able to apply for signs to be erected, under a Section 278 agreement, on the road network if their facility meets specific criteria which are listed on the UK government website here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/apply-for-brown-tourist-signs-on-roads-the-highways- agency-manage).

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 17 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Deadline 4 Supporting Information

Figure A.1: Existing signage at Podimore and Camel Cross

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 18 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Deadline 4 Supporting Information

Figure A.2: Existing signage at Plowage, Canegore Corner and Camel Hill2

2 The Applicant notes that the sign for ‘The Red Lion’ is not an authorised brown sign.

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 19 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Deadline 4 Supporting Information

Figure A.3: Existing signage at Hazlegrove

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 20 Application Document Ref: 9.20 A303 Sparkford to Ilchester Dualling Scheme Deadline 4 Supporting Information

Appendix B – Signage Strategy Drawings

Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010036 Page 21 Application Document Ref: 9.20 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 OTHER PURPOSE, OR CONTAINING ANY ERROR OMISSION WHICH IS DUE TO AN IN DATA SUPPLIED US BY PARTIES. ONLY. IT SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR USED FOR PURPOSE. THIS DOCUMENT IS ISSUED FOR THE PARTY WHICH COMMISSIONED IT AND SPECIFIC PURPOSES CONNECTED WITH CAPTIONED PROJECT WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DOCUMENT BEING RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY, OR USED FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM

Pond

Eyewell

A 303 A 70.3m Pond

20.9m

Eyewell House Eyewell

1.83m RH 1.83m

TRAITS LANE TRAITS Blackwell Farm Blackwell TRAITS LANE (Telecommunication) Mast Pond

23.3m Camel Hill Cottage Hill Camel

1.83m RH 21.5m Pond CAMEL HILL

MOTOR MUSEUM Pond Pond

25.0m B3151

74.8m

Hill Farm Hill Camel 21.9m INSET A

Cottage

Hill

Pepper

MOTOR MUSEUM MOTOR

A 303 A 73.2m

23.8m

76.2m

Service Area Service GASON LANE GASON Camel Hill Camel FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM

B 3151

Track Annis Hill Farm

28.1m Pepper Hill Copse Hill Pepper

Pond

CAMEL CROSS Station

30.7m Filling GASON LANE GASON House Hawk KEY: The Bungalow

ROUTE SIGNAGE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TSRGD 2016. LONG HAZEL PARK CAMPGROUND PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE. ROUTE SIGNAGE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TSRGD 2016. MOTOR MUSEUM PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE. ROUTE SIGNAGE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TSRGD 2016. FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE. SIGN TO INCLUDE SYMBOLS T6 AND T7 SIGN TO INCLUDE SYMBOL T129, TEXT SIGN TO INCLUDE SYMBOL T117, TEXT Path (um) Path

35.3m

(um)

Path

Ridge Copse Ridge

Spring

1.83m RH 1.83m 1.83m RH Issues

INSET C SLATE LANE (Track) LANE SLATE

"MOTOR MUSEUM" "FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM" Def 39.7m

A 303

1.83m RH

MUSEUM FLEET AIR ARM AIR FLEET MOTOR MUSEUM MOTOR

41.3m Plowage

WEST CAMEL HILL

1.83m Tk H Tk 1.83m Track The Hollies The Spinney

1.83m RH Pond

A359 Cattle Grid Cattle (Mobile Home Site) Orchard Park REV.

C01 Path (um) Path

42.1m A 359 A 06/03/19 DATE

12 Wolfester Terrace 6

INSET A

ISSUED FOR DCO

Filling Station Filling

Windrush 49.8m AMENDMENT DETAILS

Lay-by 43.3m PLEASE NOTE THE OS DATA DISPLAYED IS IN ADHERENCE TO

Path Issues INSET B INSET B

SLATE LANE (Track)

A 303

HOWELL HILL Def

Cattle Grid Cattle

44.7m

Lodge Hazelgrove

INSET C

LONG HAZEL GROUND HAZEL LONG CAMPGROUND ORIG SP

CHK'D 46.4m CS HIGH STREET APP'D ER

A 303 Drawing Number Original Size Scale Drawing Status Drawing Title Project Title Scale HE551507 TOURIST SIGNAGE STRATEGY Location HE PIN

1.83m RH 1:10000 48.5m Lay-by 1:2500 A1 C:\users\pas44049\dms16543\HE551507-MMSJV-HGN-000-DR-CH-0206.dwg A303 SPARKFORD TO ILCHESTER DUALLING

FLEET AIR ARM MUSEUM MOTOR MUSEUM 000 47.6m © CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHTS 2018 OS 100030649. 0 | Originator Date Designed MMSJV Published - DEFINITION

13/10/17

Dairy Farm Dairy PW Long Hazel Long AZ Lamorna | Type

DR 49.4m Crusty Cottage Crusty

Hill View 47.7m | Volume Date Drawn HGN

| Role Cottages

06/03/19 CH

New 2 SP

Lay-by

Issues

1 Caravan Site Caravan

Finches

125m

Long Hazel Long | Number The GARAGE

Longhazel

Meadow

Withy

Charltons

Longwhaite

0206 Trevally Date Checked

STEART HILL STEART

Rivello 4

06/03/19 Plot One Plot CS

Pippins 57.4m

Mar 6, 2019 - 2:42PM

5 Track

Gala Russet

WEST CAMEL Bramley Revision Project Ref. No. Date Approved Sheira Leigh

47.4m

Hardwarden Terrace Burrows

06/03/19

370772 The C01 Cottage Barley Suitability 250m Bromar ER 55.6m 45.4m Knockdolian 53.2m

PAS44049 Cottage Garage

Carew

Meadow View Meadow Track HILL HOWELL

HIGH STREET HOWELL HILL CONEGORE CORNER

47.3m

Perrys 1 36.7m 41.3m HOWELL HILL 1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1.83m RH 1.83m Collects

OTHER PURPOSE, OR CONTAINING ANY ERROR OMISSION WHICH IS DUE TO AN IN DATA SUPPLIED US BY PARTIES. ONLY. IT SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR USED FOR PURPOSE. THIS DOCUMENT IS ISSUED FOR THE PARTY WHICH COMMISSIONED IT AND SPECIFIC PURPOSES CONNECTED WITH CAPTIONED PROJECT WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DOCUMENT BEING RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY, OR USED

Ponds

Pond A 303 A TAUNTON

HONITON 23.3m EXETER YEOVIL TAUNTON

HONITON 20.9m

1.83m RH EXETER

YEOVIL

Pond

70.3m

Eyewell

Ruin

Pond

Eyewell House Eyewell

Mast (Telecommunication) Mast

21.5m

Camel Hill House Hill Camel

TRAITS LANE TRAITS 25.0m

TRAITS LANE B3151

Blackwell Farm Blackwell Camel Hill Cottage Hill Camel HONITON

ANDOVER

LONDON EXETER Pond

CAMEL HILL

Orchard House Orchard

Pond

21.9m

Hayloft

74.8m

Hill Farm Hill

Camel

23.8m

Cottage

Hill

Pepper

A 303 A 73.2m

B 3151

FROME

ANDOVER LONDON B3151

CAMEL CROSS CAMEL

76.2m Track

28.1m

Service Area Service

GASON LANE GASON

Camel Hill Camel

Annis Hill Farm Hill Annis

House Hawk

GLEBE FARM Glebe Barn Glebe

LONDON

Glebe Farm Glebe

ANDOVER

The Bungalow The

30.7m

Pepper Hill Copse Hill Pepper Pond

Station

Filling

Glebe Cottage Glebe

Henderson's Cottage Henderson's 35.3m

DOWNHEAD

GASON LANE GASON

Downhead Manor Downhead

Farm

Path (um) Path

Spring

39.7m

(um)

Path

Ridge Copse Ridge Issues

INSET A INSET B

1.83m RH 1.83m A 303 A 1.83m RH KEY: EXETER PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE FROME PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE HONITON PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE LONDON PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE TAUNTON PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE YEOVIL PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE ANDOVER PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE

TAUNTON

41.3m

PLOWAGE LN PLOWAGE

PLOWAGE LANE PLOWAGE

Def

3 Plowage

Cottage Appletree

1 Hollies The 4 5 Track

(Mobile Home Site) Home (Mobile

15 Park Orchard

20 Path (um) Path 1.83m RH

29 The Spinney The

WEST CAMEL HILL

Woodstock

42.1m House ANDOVER LONDON

FROME

1.83m Tk H Tk 1.83m Pond

1.83m RH

Lay-by

43.3m REV. Grid Cattle C01 A359 06/03/19 DATE

ANDOVER A 359 A LONDON FROME

ISSUED FOR DCO Annhurst HONITON EXETER

YEOVIL INSET A 12 Wolfester Terrace

B3151 AMENDMENT DETAILS

PLEASE NOTE THE OS DATA DISPLAYED IS IN ADHERENCE TO

Filling Station Filling

Issues

SLATE LANE (Track) LANE SLATE

Windrush 49.8m

HOWELL HILL Path

46.4m

Def

A 303

Track Cattle Grid Cattle LONDON EXETER HONITON YEOVIL

INSET B ORIG SP

Lay-by

Hazelgrove Lodge CHK'D

CS 47.6m APP'D ER LONDON EXETER HONITON ANDOVER

Drawing Number Original Size Scale Drawing Status Drawing Title Project Title Scale HIGH STREET Lamorna HE551507 A 303

PRIMARY ROUTES SIGNAGE STRATEGY Location HE PIN Issues

1:2500 1.83m RH 1:2500

A1 Crusty Cottage Crusty

A303 SPARKFORD TO ILCHESTER DUALLING

Hill View Hill 49.4m 000

LONDON HONITON EXETER ©

ANDOVER 48.5m CROWN COPYRIGHT AND DATABASE RIGHTS 2018 OS 100030649. 0 | Originator Date Designed MMSJV Published - DEFINITION 03/11/17

Dairy Farm Dairy Long Hazel Long GARAGE | Type DR | Volume Date Drawn HGN | Role

06/03/19 CH 47.7m

SP 45.4m 125m Lay-by | Number

Cottages HOWELL HILL

Caravan Site Caravan New

1 Long Hazel Long

EXETER 2 Finches HONITON YEOVIL

HOWELL HILL HOWELL

The 1

0212 6 1

Date Checked 1

Longhazel

Charltons

MP 134.75 MP Leigh

Sheira

Meadow Withy

47.3m

57.4m

06/03/19

Conygore

Trevally

Coneygore Farm Coneygore

60.6m

Longwhaite 4

CS 53.2m HILL STEART

Rivello

CONEGORE CORNER CONEGORE 55.6m

8 Bromar

Plot One Plot

Track

Pippins Garage

MS Knockdolian

Revision Project Ref. No. Date Approved Gala

5 Russet 06/03/19

370772 Bramley C01 Suitability 250m ER

1 Spring

47.4m Burrows

Track

A3 55.8m

The Hardwarden

Terrace

Glebeside

Barley Cottage Barley

Cottage

Carew Meadow View Meadow

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1.83m RH 1.83m 71.5m

Pond

A 303 A

Collects

23.3m

Ponds 20.9m

1.83m RH

Pond

Pond 70.3m

Eyewell Ruin

21.5m

Eyewell House Eyewell 25.0m

B3151

Mast (Telecommunication) Mast

Camel Hill House Hill Camel TRAITS LANE TRAITS SPARKFORD

TRAITS LANE WINCANTON

Blackwell Farm Blackwell

Pond Camel Hill Cottage Hill Camel

WINCANTON SPARKFORD MS

CAMEL HILL

Pond

21.9m

Orchard House Orchard

Hayloft

23.8m

74.8m

Hill Farm Hill Camel MARSTON MAGNA SERVICES SHELL SERVICES ESSO QUEEN CAMEL SHERBORNE

SPARKFORD

Cottage

Hill B 3151 Pepper

A 303 A 73.2m CAMEL CROSS CAMEL

Track

28.1m

76.2m

Annis Hill Farm Hill Annis

Service Area Service House

GASON LANE GASON Hawk Camel Hill Camel

GLEBE FARM

Glebe Barn Glebe

Glebe Farm Glebe

The Bungalow The

30.7m

Pond

Pepper Hill Copse Hill Pepper

Glebe Cottage Glebe

Henderson's Cottage Henderson's

35.3m

Station Filling

DOWNHEAD

Downhead Manor Downhead

Farm GASON LANE GASON

LANGPORT

Path (um) Path

39.7m

Spring

(um) INSET A INSET B

Path Ridge Copse Ridge

KEY:

A 303 A Issues

MARSTON MAGNA PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE LANGPORT PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE SERVICES ESSO SERVICES SHELL SPARKFORD PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE QUEEN CAMEL PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE SHERBORNE PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE WINCANTON PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE 1.83m RH 1.83m

1.83m RH

SERVICES SHELL

41.3m

PLOWAGE LANE PLOWAGE

3 Plowage

Cottage Appletree

1 Hollies The

4 5 Track Def 7

(Mobile Home Site) Home (Mobile

15 Park Orchard

20 Path (um) Path

29 The Spinney The

1.83m RH

WEST CAMEL HILL

30 42.1m

SERVICES ESSO Woodstock

SPARKFORD WINCANTON

1.83m Tk H Tk 1.83m Pond

1.83m RH Lay-by 43.3m REV.

C01 Cattle Grid Cattle 06/03/19 DATE A359

ISSUED FOR DCO A 359 A

INSET A AMENDMENT DETAILS

PLEASE NOTE THE OS DATA DISPLAYED IS IN ADHERENCE TO

Annhurst

12 Wolfester Terrace

SLATE LANE (Track) LANE SLATE

Filling Station Filling

Issues

1 Windrush

46.4m

49.8m

Path Track INSET B Def

SERVICES ESSO A 303 Cattle Grid Cattle ORIG SP

Lay-by CHK'D

47.6m

Hazelgrove Lodge APP'D ER WINCANTON

Drawing Number Original Size Scale Drawing Status Drawing Title Project Title Scale Lamorna HE551507

NON PRIMARY ROUTES SIGNAGE STRATEGY Location HE PIN 1:10000 Issues

1:2500 HIGH STREET Cottage Crusty

A 303 A303 SPARKFORD TO ILCHESTER DUALLING

Published - DEFINITION 03/11/17 48.5m AZ

WINCANTON GARAGE | Type DR

| Volume

Date Drawn Farm Dairy Long Hazel Long HGN | Role 06/03/19 CH MARSTON MAGNA SHERBORNE QUEEN CAMEL WINCANTON MARSTON MAGNA SERVICES SHELL SERVICES ESSO SPARKFORD SHERBORNE QUEEN CAMEL

SP 45.4m | Number

125m

47.7m HOWELL HILL HOWELL

0213 6 1

Lay-by Date Checked 1

Leigh Cottages

Sheira

Caravan Site Caravan

New

47.3m

57.4m

06/03/19 Conygore Long Hazel Long

2 Finches

Coneygore Farm Coneygore

60.6m The 1 CS 53.2m HILL STEART

Longhazel

Charltons

CONEGORE CORNER CONEGORE MP 134.75 MP 55.6m

8 Bromar

Withy Meadow

Trevally

Longwhaite

Rivello

Garage

MS Knockdolian

Revision Project Ref. No. Date Approved Plot One Plot 06/03/19 370772

C01

Suitability

ER Track

Pippins Spring

250m Gala Track

A3 5 55.8m

Russet Bramley

47.4m Burrows Pond

Pond Pond Henderson's Cottage

GLEBE FARMGlebe Cottage 6 Pond Glebe Farm

Glebe Barn Pond DOWNHEAD WEST CAMEL HILL

SLATE LANE (Track) 1

Pond

STEART HILL

60.6m 30.7m DOWNHEAD

Annis Hill Farm A 303

20.9m BABCARY

RNAS PODIMORE WEST CAMEL

The Spinney

WEST CAMEL 57.4m Track 21.5m BABCARY Knockdolian Pond WEST CAMEL

DOWNHEAD Garage

28.1m RNAS Bromar

21.9m GARAGE 55.6m Plowage Sheira Leigh

49.4m Lay-by 53.2m

47.6m PW

Track Hill View MS 35.3m 46.4m

Crusty Cottage CONEGORE CORNER

Lamorna CAMEL CROSS A 303 41.3m 42.1m 43.3m 39.7m BABCARY 1.83m RH Lay-by The Hollies The Bungalow

Hawk B 3151 PLOWAGE LN House 47.3m 1.83m RH

MS B3151 23.8m 25.0m

23.3m Orchard Park (Mobile Home Site) Lay-by Appletree Cottage

Path (um) HOWELL HILL HOWELL 9

3 Coneygore Farm 5

45.4m 4 6

1 Conygore

8 Issues

INSET A 15

1 30

20 HOWELL HILL 1

PLOWAGE LANE

Camel Hill House Orchard House

1.83m RH Hayloft

Camel Hill Farm Issues

Ruin Lay-by

Path (um) Camel Hill Cottage CAMEL HILL Sparkford 70.3m 4 Inn (PH) HAZLEGROVE SCHOOL Pepper Hill Copse Issues

Spring Track

Def Long Hazel Caravan Site A 303 Long Hazel Dairy Farm Pepper Pond Carew Hill Cottage Cottage Cattle Grid Rivello LB The Trevally BurrowsThe Finches Charltons Mast (Telecommunication)

Russet Gala Birchwood Pippins Bramley

HIGH STREET Emwood Car 74.8m 47.4m Park

1 Meadow View

Barley Cottage Perrys Camway

Longhazel 5

73.2m 1.83m Tk H 1.83m RH

A 303 47.7m Hardwarden Plot One A 303 Terrace

Longwhaite

1 Withy 2 1.83m RH Meadow New Cottages

Cattle Grid

HIGH STREET Camel Hill Service Area 76.2m 48.5m Filling Station Hazelgrove GASON LANE Def Lodge Eyewell House

TRAITS LANE TRAITS LANE TRAITS

Filling Station

Ridge Copse SIGN FOR WALES TO BE PROVIDED A 359 A 49.8m AT THE BLACKWELL ROAD JUNCTION 1.83m RH

Windrush

GASON LANE 1 Path (um) HAZLEGROVE SCHOOL Scale

Path 6

Wolfester Terrace 0 125m 250m Path 1:2500

Eyewell 1.83m RH (um) Blackwell Farm INSET B A359 12 Annhurst Project Title 100

Glebeside The Coach House Woodstock A303 SPARKFORD TO ILCHESTER DUALLING MP 134.75 House Marberry

90 House Drawing Title

80 KEY: LOCAL DESTINATION SIGNAGE STRATEGY RNAS YEOVILTON PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE INSET B

70 PODIMORE PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE DOWNHEAD PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE INSET A Drawing Status Suitability

60 WEST CAMEL PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE HAZLEGROVE SCHOOL PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE Published - DEFINITION A3

50 BABCARY PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE WALES PROPOSED SIGNAGE ROUTE Scale Designed Drawn Checked Approved 1:2500 AZ SP CS ER 40 Original Size Date Date Date Date A1 31/10/17 06/03/19 06/03/19 06/03/19 30

Drawing Number Project Ref. No. HE PIN | Originator | Volume 20 389107 THIS DOCUMENT IS ISSUED FOR THE PARTY WHICH COMMISSIONED IT AND FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES CONNECTED WITH THE CAPTIONED PROJECT HE551507 MMSJV HGN ONLY. IT SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY OR USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. Revision

10 C01 06/03/19 ISSUED FOR DCO SP CS ER WE ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS DOCUMENT BEING RELIED UPON BY ANY OTHER PARTY, OR BEING USED FOR ANY 000 DR CH 0214 C01 OTHER PURPOSE, OR CONTAINING ANY ERROR OR OMISSION WHICH IS DUE TO AN ERROR OR OMISSION IN DATA SUPPLIED TO US BY OTHER PARTIES. REV. DATE AMENDMENT DETAILS ORIG CHK'D APP'D Location | Type | Role | Number 0 C:\users\pas44049\dms16543\HE551507-MMSJV-HGN-000-DR-CH-0214.dwg Mar 6, 2019 - 2:50PM PAS44049