New Evangelicalism: Its History, Characteristics, and Fruit Copyright 1995 by David W

New Evangelicalism: Its History, Characteristics, and Fruit Copyright 1995 by David W. Cloud First edition 1995 Second edition 1999 Tis edition January 2021 ISBN 1-58318-100-8 Published by Way of Life Literature PO Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061 866-295-4143 (toll free) - [email protected] www.wayofife.org Canada: Bethel Baptist Church 4212 Campbell St. N., London Ont. N6P 1A6 519-652-2619 (voice) - 519-652-0056 (fax) [email protected] Printed in Canada by Bethel Baptist Print Ministry Contents Introduction ...............................................................................5 Te History of New Evangelicalism ........................................7 Te Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy ..........................7 A Rejection of Fundamentalism .............................................28 Te Old Evangelicalism ............................................................31 Te Infuence of New Evangelicalism ..................................37 Te Characteristics of New Evangelicalism .........................40 Repudiation of Separatism .......................................................41 Infltration ..................................................................................46 Dialogue .....................................................................................48 A Love for Positivism and Non-judgmentalism ...................62 Exalting Love and Unity above Doctrine ...............................74 A Sof, Non-dogmatic Stance ..................................................84 A Sof Attitude toward Heretics ..............................................86 Pragmatism ................................................................................87 Intellectualism ...........................................................................91 Anti-Fundamentalism ..............................................................97 Inconsistency and Contradiction ..........................................104 Essentials and Non-essentials ................................................108 A Social-Justice Emphasis ......................................................113 Spiritual Pacifsm ....................................................................116 Te Fruit of New Evangelicalism .......................................119 Apostasy in Doctrine ..............................................................121 Apostasy in Ecumenism .........................................................137 Apostasy in Christian Living .................................................156 Apostasy in Acceptance of Heretics .....................................160 Apostasy in Acceptance of Communism .............................168 Conclusion .............................................................................172 Review Questions .................................................................175 Hosea 4:6 warns, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…” Introduction I am convinced that few errors are as destructive to strong Bible-believing churches as New Evangelicalism. When people leave such churches, where do they go? Do they join the Roman Catholic Church or a modernistic Protestant church, such as the United Methodist, the Presbyterian Church U.S.A., the United Church of Canada, or the Uniting Church of Australia? Do they join a cult such as Mormonism or Jeho- vah’s Witness? Tat seldom occurs. Most people that leave fundamentalist-type churches go the positive-thinking, easy- going, New Evangelical route. Few false philosophies more directly pull at members of fundamental Baptist churches than New Evangelicalism. Church members are confronted with it on every hand-- through popular Christian radio and television preachers, at the local ecumenical bookstore, through members of other churches, through ecumenical evangelistic crusades, through political and social activity, through interdenominational or- ganizations such as Promise Keepers. It is therefore essential that we understand the nature of New Evangelicalism. We are concerned that many of the members of fundamentalist churches do not have a clear understanding of exactly what New Evangelicalism is, nor of the history of the doctri- nal battles that have been fought to preserve the Truth in the past 100 years. Many seem to think that New Evangelicalism is a problem that existed decades ago and that no longer is an issue. To be ignorant of the insidious and pervasive nature of New Evangelicalism is to be unprepared to identify and resist it; yet large numbers of Bible believers do not know anything about it. 6 New Evangelicalism: It’s History, Characteristics, Fruit When a fundamental Baptist evangelist recently asked the students of a well-known independent Baptist school to raise their hands if they could defne New Evangelicalism, only two could respond. Hosea 4:6 warns, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge…” Te History of New Evangelicalism Te Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy It was the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy that set the stage for New Evangelicalism. To understand New Evangelicalism, we must go back two centuries to the formation of theological modernism, which had its origin in Europe, particularly in Germany, in the 19th century and was the rationalistic thinking of the time applied to Christianity. It was the dawn of the “scientifc era”; many believed that mankind was on the verge of discovering the secrets of the universe and solving mankind’s problems. Anti-Christian thinkers such as Darwin, Huxley, Hegel, and Marx led the movement to dethrone God and replace Him with man. Unregenerate “Christian” professors in many European universities and seminaries, having already rejected the Bible as the infallible Word of God, gladly accepted the humanistic thinking of the day and set out to apply evolu- tionary philosophy to the Bible and Christianity. Te result was tragic: Te Bible was brought down to the level of a mere human book, inspired only in the sense that Shakespeare’s writings were “inspired.” Jesus Christ was brought down to the level of a mere man: a great teacher, perhaps, but a mere man nonetheless Teological liberalism spread like ivy. First it sleeps, then creeps, then leaps. Tis is precisely what occurred with modernism. It began in a seemingly insignifcant way in the 18th century; it crept forward and expanded its infuence in the 19th; and then it leaped from denomination to denomination and spread throughout the world in the 20th. It was intro- duced to American denominations by men who studied in 8 New Evangelicalism: It’s History, Characteristics, Fruit prestigious, though apostate, European universities and by European professors and pastors who visited American schools and denominational churches. Nominal Christianity had paved the way for this apostasy. In Germany, the Lutheran state church was spiritually powerless. Te nation’s citizens were members of the church by the rite of infant baptism, but for the most part they were not born again and the new birth was seldom preached. A similar situation existed in England, though to a lesser degree. Te Church of England, which dominated religious life, largely represented a nominal Christianity, but unlike in Germany, there was a stronger evangelical movement within the state church of England. Tere was also a stronger independent church movement apart from the state apparatus, as represented by Baptists, Methodists, Brethren, Salvation Army, and others. Spiritual revivals had produced good fruit in England in the late 18th and early 19th century. Teological modernism arose in a day when heretical philosophies and doctrines were on the increase. It was the age of “enlightenment” during which rationalism was positively encouraged by Frederick II, the “philosopher king,” who reigned over Prussia for 46 years (1740-1786). (Rationalism refers to the exaltation of man’s rational thinking to the place of authority over the Bible.) Te “age of enlightenment” should actually be called the “age of unbelief.” Frederick was “a thorough rationalist and patron of ‘free thought.’ Te sight of a cross, it was said, was enough to make him blaspheme” (Iain Murray, Evangelicalism Divided, p. 5). Te Shorter Oxford English Dictionary of 1934 correctly de- fned the “Enlightenment” as “shallow and pretentious intellectualism, unreasonable contempt for authority and tradi- tion.” H. E. G. PAULUS (1761-1851) of Heidelberg, Germany, devised naturalistic explanations for Christ’s miracles during the frst half of the nineteenth century. He claimed, for exam- The History of New Evangelicalism 9 ple, that Jesus did not walk on the water but was actually walking on the shore and in the mist and fog it only appeared that he was walking on the water. Paulus devised the ridicu- lous hypothesis that Jesus did not die on the cross, but only swooned, and in the coolness of the tomb revived, and afer an earthquake moved the stone he walked out and appeared to the disciples. (He did not explain how that a nearly dead man could convince the disciples that he was the resurrected Messiah.) FREDERICK SCHLEIRMACHER (1768-1834) of Halle, Germany, exalted experience and feeling over Bible doctrine. He used traditional Christian language but gave it a new def- inition. He emphasized the necessity of knowing Christ through faith, but his “faith” did not mean believing the Bible as the infallible Word of God but referred merely to man’s own intuition or consciousness. Schleiermacher did not con- sider historical biblical reality to be necessary to faith. By

Load more