Harvesting the Full Power of Safety Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harvesting the Full Power of Safety Data Harvesting the full Federal Aviation power of safety data Administration Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) Commercial Aviation Safety Team (CAST) Presented to: Global Runway Safety Symposium By: Jay Pardee, CSTA Date: May 24, 2011 What is ASIAS…. A collaborative Government and Industry initiative on data sharing & analysis to proactively discover safety concerns before accidents or incidents occur, leading to timely mitigation and prevention. 2 ASIAS Functional Benefits With ASIAS, the aviation community will be able to . • Identify Systemic Risks – Establish safety baselines of current operations – Identify known and newly emerging system vulnerabilities – Monitor safety trends • Evaluate Identified Risks – Estimate their probabilities – Assess their severities – Uncover event precursors – Diagnose event causation • Formulate Mitigations – Assess the probable effects of various safety enhancements through simulation studies • Monitor Mitigation Effects – Assess the effectiveness of SEs in accordance with metrics established by the CAST ASIAS is Governed by Formal Principles Data used solely for Non-punitive reporting advancement of safety Analyses approved by an Airline data is de-identified ASIAS Executive Board Types of Proactive Safety Analyses Directed Studies Known Risk Monitoring Safety Enhancement Assessment Vulnerability Discovery Benchmarking Operations A Collaborative FAA-Industry ASIAS Executive Board (AEB) Provides Guidance and Oversight 5 Data Sources Supporting ASIAS Studies • ASAP • Traffic Management Proprietary • FOQA ATC Reroutes and Delays Data • ATSAP Information • Airport Configuration • Manufacturers data and Operations • Avionics data • Sector and Route Structure • Procedures Safety Data • Aviation Safety • Surveillance Data for Reporting System En Route, Terminal and • Runway Incursion Airport • Surface Incident • ASDE-X • Operational Error / Operational Deviation • Pilot Deviation • Vehicle or Pedestrian Other Deviation Information • National Transportation Safety Board • Bureau of • FAA Accident/Incident Transportation Data System Statistics • FAA Service Difficulty • Weather / Winds Reports 6 Overview of Airline Programs Contributing Data to ASIAS 83,000 ASAP & 30,000 ATSAP FOQA reports available for analysis ASAP 17 4 10 Total Count of ASIAS ASAP Programs 0 10 20 30 40 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Flight Ops 34 3 Number of airlines Maintenance 18 4 7 Dispatch 17 5 9 7.7 million operations available for analysis Cabin 6 3 Key Active Pending ASIAS Pending Airline Activated Pending ASIAS action Pending airline action As of 7 April 2011 7 ASIAS Members 38 Airlines Air Wisconsin Airlines Hawaiian Airlines AirTran Airways JetBlue Airways Government Alaska Airlines Mesa Airlines FAA American Airlines Mesaba Airlines NASA American Eagle Miami Air International USAF Safety Center Atlantic Southeast Airlines Piedmont Airlines Chautauqua Airlines Pinnacle Airlines CitationAir PSA Airlines Colgan Air Republic Airlines Industry Comair Shuttle America AIA CommutAir SkyWest Airlines ALPA Compass Airlines Southwest Airlines APA Continental Airlines Sun Country Airlines ATA Delta Airlines Trans States Airlines Bell Helicopter Textron Empire Airlines United Airlines Boeing ExpressJet United Parcel Service NATCA Frontier Airlines US Airways GoJet Airlines USA 3000 Gulfstream International Spirit Airlines As of 7 April 2011 Data Fusion Provides Valuable Insights to Future Threats (Precursors) Traffic Tracks Source: FAA National Offload Program Minimum Vectoring Altitudes Source: Air Traffic Control Airport & Airspace Safety Event Focus Procedures Source: Digital Flight Data, Source: Air Traffic Control Safety Reports Weather Source: FAA & NOAA Terrain Source: National Elevation Data ASAP Reports ASIAS Proprietary Do Not Distribute The success of information sharing relies on collaboration between voluntary safety programs. M & E Flight Ops ATSAP FOQA Cabin Dispatch Aviation ASIAS CAST Community Analysis and Emerging Safety Monitoring + Concerns Safety Vulnerability Enhancement Share Best Discovery Implementation Practices Risk of Runway Overrun (RoRO) Metrics, r50 Notional Data Deceleration 100kts to 50kts Weather conditions as reported by ASOS Visibility: 0.75 mi Wind Gusts up to 22 mph Temp: 26°F Headwind: 16 kts 0.02” of precipitation in last hr. Light snow/ice and fog reported Threaded Track Example Continued Notional Data 25 knots 232’ remaining 50 knot Point 901’ remaining 14 Follow on ASIAS Activity • Complete Unstabilized approach study detailed “drill down” • Complete Abnormal Runway Contact (ARC) study • Complete Risk of Runway Overrun study • Evaluate linkages between these three studies • Monitor Effectiveness of solutions .
Recommended publications
  • My Personal Callsign List This List Was Not Designed for Publication However Due to Several Requests I Have Decided to Make It Downloadable
    - www.egxwinfogroup.co.uk - The EGXWinfo Group of Twitter Accounts - @EGXWinfoGroup on Twitter - My Personal Callsign List This list was not designed for publication however due to several requests I have decided to make it downloadable. It is a mixture of listed callsigns and logged callsigns so some have numbers after the callsign as they were heard. Use CTL+F in Adobe Reader to search for your callsign Callsign ICAO/PRI IATA Unit Type Based Country Type ABG AAB W9 Abelag Aviation Belgium Civil ARMYAIR AAC Army Air Corps United Kingdom Civil AgustaWestland Lynx AH.9A/AW159 Wildcat ARMYAIR 200# AAC 2Regt | AAC AH.1 AAC Middle Wallop United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 300# AAC 3Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 400# AAC 4Regt | AAC AgustaWestland AH-64 Apache AH.1 RAF Wattisham United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 500# AAC 5Regt AAC/RAF Britten-Norman Islander/Defender JHCFS Aldergrove United Kingdom Military ARMYAIR 600# AAC 657Sqn | JSFAW | AAC Various RAF Odiham United Kingdom Military Ambassador AAD Mann Air Ltd United Kingdom Civil AIGLE AZUR AAF ZI Aigle Azur France Civil ATLANTIC AAG KI Air Atlantique United Kingdom Civil ATLANTIC AAG Atlantic Flight Training United Kingdom Civil ALOHA AAH KH Aloha Air Cargo United States Civil BOREALIS AAI Air Aurora United States Civil ALFA SUDAN AAJ Alfa Airlines Sudan Civil ALASKA ISLAND AAK Alaska Island Air United States Civil AMERICAN AAL AA American Airlines United States Civil AM CORP AAM Aviation Management Corporation United States Civil
    [Show full text]
  • APR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Apr-09 Apr-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 2,417 2,177 11.0% 10,631 10,861 -2.1% American/American Connection 14,126 14,749 -4.2% 55,394 60,259 -8.1% Continental/Cont Express (a) 5,808 5,165 12.4% 22,544 23,049 -2.2% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,222 8,620 -16.2% 27,007 37,838 -28.6% ExpressJet Airlines 0 5,275 N/A 0 21,647 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,888 2,874 N/A 23,531 2,874 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 120 N/A 0 4,793 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,882 6,920 -43.9% 12,864 22,030 -41.6% US Airways (d) 6,301 6,570 -4.1% 25,665 29,462 -12.9% United/United Express (e) 23,359 25,845 -9.6% 89,499 97,355 -8.1% Total 70,003 78,315 -10.6% 267,135 310,168 -13.9% Charters Other Charters 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total 120 0 N/A 409 564 -27.5% Total enplaned passengers 70,123 78,315 -10.5% 267,544 310,732 -13.9% Total deplaned passengers 71,061 79,522 -10.6% 263,922 306,475 -13.9% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • MAR 2009 Stats Rpts
    SUMMARY OF ENPLANED PASSENGERS Colorado Springs Airport Month Year-to-date Percent Percent Enplaned passengers by Airline Mar-09 Mar-08 change 2009 2008 change Scheduled Carriers Allegiant Air 3,436 3,735 -8.0% 8,214 8,684 -5.4% American/American Connection 15,900 15,873 0.2% 41,268 45,510 -9.3% Continental/Cont Express (a) 6,084 6,159 -1.2% 16,736 17,884 -6.4% Delta /Delta Connection (b) 7,041 10,498 -32.9% 19,785 29,218 -32.3% ExpressJet Airlines 0 6,444 N/A 0 16,372 N/A Frontier/Lynx Aviation 6,492 0 N/A 16,643 0 N/A Midwest Airlines 0 2,046 N/A 0 4,673 N/A Northwest/ Northwest Airlink (c) 3,983 6,773 -41.2% 8,982 15,110 -40.6% US Airways (d) 7,001 7,294 -4.0% 19,364 22,892 -15.4% United/United Express (e) 24,980 26,201 -4.7% 66,140 71,510 -7.5% Total 74,917 85,023 -11.9% 197,132 231,853 -15.0% Charters Other Charters 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total 150 188 -20.2% 289 564 -48.8% Total enplaned passengers 75,067 85,211 -11.9% 197,421 232,417 -15.1% Total deplaned passengers 72,030 82,129 -12.3% 192,861 226,953 -15.0% (a) Continental Express provided by ExpressJet. (d) US Airways provided by Mesa Air Group. (b) Delta Connection includes Comair and SkyWest . (e) United Express provided by Mesa Air Group and SkyWest.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractional Charter
    Under a joint venture with the People’s Global charter market experiences rebound Republic of China, NetJets China plans to manage and charter aircraft, such oming off its long slump following the onset of the 2008 reces- as these Challengers, that are wholly sion, air charter has enjoyed a generally good year around the owned by customers, rather than C introducing fractional ownership. globe, and there are indications that the demand will continue to pick up as the world economy finally rights itself, and charter continues to adapt to the needs of travelers around the world. Here’s a look at the SPECIAL REPORT current state of charter markets in North America, Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East. & by James Wynbrandt North America hourly rates for light, midsize and large- FRACTIONAL CHARTER Following two slack years, North cabin aircraft over the past six months American air charter flights increased has shown fluctuations from 10 percent almost 9 percent (8.9%) from August above to 3 percent below the previous 2012 to July 2013 over the same period year’s pricing, and domestic operators Challenger 300 for travelers flying to and Whatever the discrepancies in data, a year before, according to aviation complain that aggressive pricing by com- from designated zones. Sentient, which several major Europe-based providers MARKET research and services firm Argus Inter- petitors keeps rates depressed. claims more than 4,000 active customers, report strong growth over the past year, 21 Global charter market experiences rebound part 1 national. Charter flight activity for all Sales of jet cards, whose flight time is saw strong demand in the charter market due as much to business model adjust- 24 Big four national frax list dwindles to two cabin categories was up for the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Reporting Programs
    Federal Aviation Voluntary Administration Reporting Programs Presented to: KOCA By: Anthony Ferrante Date: April 30, 2014 Strategy for Overseeing a Large Organization • Exploit all resources – The people performing the service have valuable insights • Technology will not take you everywhere you need to go – Some mandatory reports could be automatically captured by software • Encourage a safety culture – Voluntary safety reporting programs are part of a positive, vibrant, safety culture Federal Aviation Administration Philosophy for Voluntary Reporting Programs • Value mistakes • Learn from mistakes • Make safety improvements 誤解の価値を理解する事 • from mistakes 誤解から学ぶ事 Federal Aviation Administration Components of a Voluntary Reporting Program REGULATOR Employee Reports EVENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVE Federal Aviation Administration Voluntary Reporting Programs • An oversight authority is a critical component of a voluntary reporting program • These programs use employee input to identify: – significant safety concerns and issues, – operational deficiencies, – non-compliance with regulations, – deviations from policies and procedures, and – unusual safety events Federal Aviation Administration Acceptable Reports • Must be inadvertent • Must not involve gross negligence (that is, the individual did not intentionally introduce risk) • Must not appear to involve criminal activity • Must not appear to involve substance abuse, controlled substances, or alcohol • Must not appear to involve intentional falsification Federal Aviation Administration FAA Voluntary Reporting Programs • Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) • Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP)- Industry employees • Air Traffic Safety Action Program (ATSAP)- Air Traffic Control employees • ATO Safety and Technical Training Program (T-SAP) Technical Operations Services employees Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) ASIAS Overview Federal Aviation Administration What is ASIAS….
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Air Transportation
    University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Journal of Air Transportation About the Journal Editorial Board Panel of Reviewers Volumes Submission Guidelines Author Index Order Form Sorenson Best Paper Award Journal of Air Transportation VOLUME 8, NUMBER 2--2003 University of Nebraska at Omaha 6001 Dodge Street ISSN: 1544-6980 Omaha, NE 68182 Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 (402) 554-3424 University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute About the Journal of Air Transportation THE JOURNAL Development The Journal of Air Transportation (JAT) mission is to provide the global community Scope immediate key resource information in all Dissemination areas of air transportation. Our goal is to be recognized as the preeminent scholarly Organizations journal in the aeronautical aspects of transportation. As an international and Editors interdisciplinary journal, the JAT provides a forum for peer-reviewed articles in all areas Personnel of aviation and space transportation research, policy, theory, case study, practice, and issues. While maintaining a broad scope, a key focal point of the journal is in the area of aviation administration and policy. ISSN: 1544-6980 Exit Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 Return University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Development The JAT was conceptualized to fulfill an international void of scholarly publications in this area as identified by the primary organizers. It is envisioned that aviation leaders will utilize the JAT as a key decision-making tool. Scholarly rigor and standards will be uncompromised with regular evaluation by the Editorial Board and Panel of Reviewers. Return ISSN: 1544-6980 Exit Library of Congress: HE9761.1.J68 University of Nebraska at Omaha Aviation Institute Scope The JAT will accept manuscripts on all topics that relate to air transportation, both technical and non-technical.
    [Show full text]
  • Saab 340 the VERSATILE TURBOPROP Saab 340 > the Versatile TURBOPROP
    SAAB 340 THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP 2 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP ”WE ARE A NICHE MARKET operator...THE SAAB 340 IS A WORKHORSE AIRCRAFT AND very RELIABLE.” GEORG POMMER ROBIN HOOD Aviation CEO THE FLEXIBLE PERFORMER To safeguard against today’s rapidly changing environment and improve profitability, successful airlines must choose an aircraft that minimizes risk and is adaptable to an ever-changing market environment. In addition, passengers demand comfort and service similar to that offered by major carriers. The Saab 340 is a favorite among airline passengers due to its flexibility, comfort and reliable performance. With about half the operating costs of a regional jet, the Saab 340 can offer service in a variety of markets, large or small. RELIABILITY IN A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS The cost-effective Saab 340 consistently generates profits for a wide range of regional air transport services. With the right blend of technologies, the Saab 340 combines high productivity with dependability. THE “FACTS” @ 4Q – 2009 • 25-year track record • best selling 30-seat turboprop • more than 410 operational aircraft found on six continents and in 30 countries • over 13 million hours flown and an estimated 250 million passengers • consistent 99% dispatch reliability • award winning customer support services 3 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP THE BIG AIRLINE CHOICE 4 SAAB 340 > THE VERSATILE TURBOPROP WORLD’S LARGEST 340BPLUS OPERATOR ”...OUR OVERALL OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE A SEAMLESS The red, white and blue Delta livery is replacing Northwest colors service PRODUCT TO OUR on all aircraft and airport signage as the newly merged airline is passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry
    Essays on Strategic Behavior in the U.S. Airline Industry Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Kerria Measkhan Tan, B.A., M.A. Graduate Program in Economics The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Matthew Lewis, Advisor James Peck Huanxing Yang c Copyright by Kerria Measkhan Tan 2012 Abstract In my first dissertation essay, \Incumbent Response to Entry by Low-Cost Carri- ers in the U.S. Airline Industry," I analyze the price response of incumbents to entry by low-cost carriers in the U.S. airline industry. Previous theoretical papers suggest that airlines might respond to entry by lowering prices to compete harder for existing customers or they might increase prices to exploit their brand-loyal customers. This paper tests which effect is more prominent in the airline industry. I find that when one of four low-cost carriers enters a particular route, legacy carrier incumbents respond differently than low-cost carrier incumbents to new low-cost carrier entry. Legacy carriers decrease their mean airfare, 10th percentile airfare, and 90th percentile air- fare before and after entry by a low-cost carrier. However, low-cost carriers do not significantly alter their pricing strategy. The differing incumbent responses can be attributed to the finding that low-cost carrier entrants tend to match the price set by rival low-cost carriers in the quarter of entry and tend to enter with a lower price than that of legacy carrier incumbents. The results also suggest that entry does not affect price dispersion by incumbent carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Airlines Codes
    Airlines codes Sorted by Airlines Sorted by Code Airline Code Airline Code Aces VX Deutsche Bahn AG 2A Action Airlines XQ Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Acvilla Air WZ Denim Air 2D ADA Air ZY Ireland Airways 2E Adria Airways JP Frontier Flying Service 2F Aea International Pte 7X Debonair Airways 2G AER Lingus Limited EI European Airlines 2H Aero Asia International E4 Air Burkina 2J Aero California JR Kitty Hawk Airlines Inc 2K Aero Continente N6 Karlog Air 2L Aero Costa Rica Acori ML Moldavian Airlines 2M Aero Lineas Sosa P4 Haiti Aviation 2N Aero Lloyd Flugreisen YP Air Philippines Corp 2P Aero Service 5R Millenium Air Corp 2Q Aero Services Executive W4 Island Express 2S Aero Zambia Z9 Canada Three Thousand 2T Aerocaribe QA Western Pacific Air 2U Aerocondor Trans Aereos 2B Amtrak 2V Aeroejecutivo SA de CV SX Pacific Midland Airlines 2W Aeroflot Russian SU Helenair Corporation Ltd 2Y Aeroleasing SA FP Changan Airlines 2Z Aeroline Gmbh 7E Mafira Air 3A Aerolineas Argentinas AR Avior 3B Aerolineas Dominicanas YU Corporate Express Airline 3C Aerolineas Internacional N2 Palair Macedonian Air 3D Aerolineas Paraguayas A8 Northwestern Air Lease 3E Aerolineas Santo Domingo EX Air Inuit Ltd 3H Aeromar Airlines VW Air Alliance 3J Aeromexico AM Tatonduk Flying Service 3K Aeromexpress QO Gulfstream International 3M Aeronautica de Cancun RE Air Urga 3N Aeroperlas WL Georgian Airlines 3P Aeroperu PL China Yunnan Airlines 3Q Aeropostal Alas VH Avia Air Nv 3R Aerorepublica P5 Shuswap Air 3S Aerosanta Airlines UJ Turan Air Airline Company 3T Aeroservicios
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers
    Detailed Breakdown of Disability-Related Complaint Data: All Carriers Total number of complaints submitted: 11,518 Carrier Name Number of Complaints AER LINGUS LIMITED 0 AERO CALIFORNIA 1 AERODYNAMICS, INC. 0 AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES 0 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 0 AEROMEXICO 1 AEROPOSTAL ALAS DE VENEZUEL 3 AEROSVIT UKRANIAN AIRLINES 0 AIR ATLANTA EUROPE 16 AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC 0 AIR CANADA 248 AIR CANADA JAZZ 10 AIR CHINA 1 AIR COMET S.A. 0 AIR EUROPA LINEAS AEREAS 0 AIR FRANCE 30 AIR JAMAICA LIMITED 1 AIR JAPAN, CO 0 AIR LUXOR 0 AIR NEW ZEALAND 3 AIR PACIFIC, LTD. 0 AIR TAHITI NUI 1 AIR TRANSAT 17 AIR WISCONSIN 132 AIR-INDIA 4 AIRTRAN 87 ALASKA AIRLINES 215 ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIA 10 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO. 0 ALLEGIANT 5 ALOHA AIRLINES 7 AMERICA WEST 536 AMERICAN AIRLINES 2061 AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES 171 ASIANA AIRLINES, INC. 3 ATA 94 ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES 191 AUSTRIAN AIRLINES 27 AVIACSA AIRLINES 3 AVIATION CONCEPTS 0 BAHAMASAIR HOLDING LIMITED 5 BOSTON-MAINE AIRWAYS 8 BRITANNIA AIRWAYS LTD. 147 BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC 165 BRITISH MIDLAND AIRWAYS LTD 16 BWIA WEST INDIES AIRWAYS 1 CASINO EXPRESS 1 CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS, LTD 8 CHAMPION AIR 7 CHAUTAUQUA AIRLINES, INC 67 CHINA AIRLINES, LTD 3 CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES 0 COMAIR 301 COMPANIA MEXICANA DE AVIACI 1 COMPANIA PANAMENA (COPA) 3 CONDOR FLUGDIENST 0 CONTINENTAL 398 CONTINENTAL MICRONESIA 3 CZECH AIRLINES 2 DELTA AIR LINES 1326 EGYPTAIR 0 EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES LTD. 66 EMIRATES AIRLINE 4 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 0 EUROATLANTIC AIRWAYS TRANSPORTES AE 0 EVA AIRWAYS CORPORATION 2 EXECUTIVE AIRLINES 11 FALCON AIR EXPRESS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2 Jeffrey A
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Flightlines Newsletter Department of Aviation Spring 1994 Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2 Jeffrey A. Johnson St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/avia_news Part of the Other Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, Jeffrey A., "Flightlines, Vol. 2, No. 2" (1994). Flightlines Newsletter. 1. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/avia_news/1 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Aviation at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Flightlines Newsletter by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vol. 2 #2 St. Cloud State University Aviation Department HH216 720 S 4th Ave St. Cloud, MN 56301-4498 http:/www.stcloud.msus.edu/aviation Spring 1994 CAA SITE VISIT address changes should contact the Aviation faculty. The Council on Aviation Accreditation (CAA) Site v isit Team chaired by Dr. Tom Connolly, Embry Riddle B727 PROCEDURES COURSE Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, visited the The B727 Procedures course was taught for the first time SCSU Aviation program May 1-3, 1994. Additional team during Spring 1994. The course concentrates on the use of members were Dr. Tim Brady, Central Missouri State SMAC (Standard Maneuvers and Configurations), SOPA University, and Mr. Roland Desjardins, Vice President of (Standard Operating Procedures-Amplified) and flows, using Commercial Operations, American Airlines. Mr. Gary mock-up panels which were provided by Northwest Kiteley, CAA Executive Director, accompanied the Site Visit Aerospace Training Corporation (NATCO).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Statistics Office of Airline Information Accounting and Reporting Directive
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DIRECTIVE RESEARCH AND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION No. 304 A Issue Date: 02-01-12 Effective Date: 1-1-2012 Part: 241 Section: 04 AIR CARRIER GROUPINGS This revised 2012 Accounting and Reporting Directive is to show the merger of ExpressJet Airlines and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, along with updates the reporting groups for filing the Form 41 report during calendar year 2012. From our review, we updated the carrier groupings as follows: AIR CARRIER NEW REPORTING GROUP Kalitta Air LLC Group III Gulf & Caribbean Cargo Group I - $20 million to $100 million Kalitta Charters II Group I - $20 million to $100 million Tradewinds Airlines Group I - $20 million to $100 million Carriers are grouped according to the operating revenue boundaries contained in Section 04 of Part 241. The current reporting levels are: Group III Over $1 billion Group II Over $100 million to $1 billion Group I $100 million and under Subgroups: Group I - $20 million to $100 million Group I - Under $20 million Changes in the reporting groups will become effective January 1, 2012. Any questions regarding the groupings should be directed to [email protected]. Anne Y. Suissa Director Airline Information Attachment ATTACHMENT PAGE 1 OF 3 GROUP III AIR CARRIERS - 18 CARRIER Air Tran Alaska Airlines American Airlines American Eagle Astar * Atlas Air Delta Air Lines Federal Express Frontier Airlines Hawaiian Airlines Jet Blue Kalitta Air LLC SkyWest Southwest Airlines United Airlines (merger with Continental effective 1/1/2012) UPS USAirways World Airways * * Reporting in Group III by waiver.
    [Show full text]