Osteological Evidence for Paraphyly of the Avian Order Caprimulgiformes (Nightjars and Allies) Gerald Mayr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Osteological Evidence for Paraphyly of the Avian Order Caprimulgiformes (Nightjars and Allies) Gerald Mayr J. Ornithol. 143, 82±97 (2002) ã Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft/Blackwell Wissenschaftsverlag, Berlin ISSN 0021-8375 Osteological evidence for paraphyly of the avian order Caprimulgiformes (nightjars and allies) Gerald Mayr Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Sektion fuÈr Ornithologie, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Email: [email protected] Summary The first phylogenetic analysis of osteological characters in the Caprimulgiformes (night- jars and allies) provides strong evidence that this order is paraphyletic. Well supported is monophyly of a clade comprising Caprimulgidae, Nyctibiidae, Aegothelidae and the tradi- tional Apodiformes (swifts and hummingbirds). Within this clade Nyctibiidae (potoos) and Caprimulgidae (nightjars) on the one hand, and Aegothelidae (owlet-nightjars) and the traditional Apodiformes on the other are sister taxa. Whereas monophyly of Nyctibiidae and Caprimulgidae is in accordance with most previous studies, monophyly of the so far poorlystudied Aegothelidae and the traditional Apodiformes has not been suggested by previous authors. The affinities of the Steatornithidae (oilbirds) and Podargidae (frog- mouths) cannot be conclusivelyresolved at present. Keywords: Phylogeny, Caprimulgiformes, Apodiformes, Aegothelidae, osteology. Zusammenfassung Osteologische Hinweise auf Paraphylie der Vogelordnung Caprimulgiformes (SchwalmvoÈgel) Die erste phylogenetische Analyse der Caprimulgiformes (SchwalmvoÈgel) aufgrund osteologischer Merkmale liefert deutliche Hinweise auf eine Paraphylie dieser Ordnung. Gut gestuÈtzt ist die Monophylie eines Taxons, das Caprimulgidae, Nyctibiidae, Aegotheli- dae und die traditionelle Ordnung Apodiformes (Segler und Kolibris) beinhaltet. Inner- halb dieser Gruppe sind Nyctibiidae (TagschlaÈfer) und Caprimulgidae (Ziegenmelker) auf der einen Seite, sowie Aegothelidae (HoÈhlenschwalme) und die traditionellen Apodifor- mes auf der anderen Seite monophyletisch. WaÈhrend Monophylie von Nyctibiidae und Ca- primulgidae im Einklang mit den meisten bisherigen Untersuchungen steht, wurde eine Monophylie der bisher kaum untersuchten Aegothelidae und der traditionellen Apodifor- mes noch nicht vorgeschlagen. Die groûsystematische Stellung der Steatornithidae (Fett- schwalme) und Podargidae (Eulenschwalme) kann zur Zeit nicht uÈberzeugend begruÈndet werden. Introduction 19th and early20th century,well before the concepts of modern phylogenetic systematics Virtuallyall of the currentlyrecognized avian were introduced (Hennig 1950), and some re- orders were established byanatomists in the main verypoorlydiagnosed. An especiallyill- U.S. Copyright Clearance Center Code Statement: 0021-8375/2002/14301±0082 $ 15.00/0 G. Mayr ´ Paraphyly of Caprimulgiformes 83 defined order is the Caprimulgiformes which closelyrelated (see Sibley& Ahlquist 1990: traditionallyincludes five recent families: pp. 414±418 for a detailed review of the his- the holarctic Caprimulgidae (nightjars), the toryof classification). Cracraft (1981: 700) neotropic Nyctibiidae (potoos) and Steatorni- noted some morphological characters in order thidae (oilbirds), and the Australasian Aego- to support this traditional classification. How- thelidae (owlet-nightjars) and Podargidae ever, the characters he listed as synapomor- (frogmouths). All are crepuscular or nocturnal phies of Aegothelidae and Podargidae are ei- birds, and most feed on flying insects (the ther absent in stem-group Podargidae Steatornithidae are frugivorous). Caprimulgi- (ªdouble-notched sternum with long posterior form birds have a superficiallysimilar external processesº, see Mayr 1999, 2001), incorrect appearance which includes a wide beak with a (ªanterior iliac blades extremelywell devel- verylarge gape, and a soft plumage with cryp- opedº ± in the podargid genus Batrachostomus tic colouration. In their osteologyand internal the alae praeacetabulares ilii are verynarrow), anatomy, however, the members of this order or insufficientlydefined (ªpeculiar egg-white are remarkablydifferent. Monophylyof the protein patternº). In a recent paper, Cracraft Caprimulgiformes has never been convinc- (2001: Fig. 3) considered the systematic posi- inglyestablished with derived morphological tion of Aegothelidae and Podargidae to be un- characters, and the characters usuallylisted to resolved. diagnose this order (e. g. Stresemann 1927±34, Wetmore (1960) thought the Steatornithidae Sibley& Ahlquist 1990) are either not present to be the sister taxon of all other caprimulgi- in all taxa, plesiomorphic (e. g., anisodactyl form birds, which is reflected bytheir classifi- feet, holorhinal nares, presence of aftershaft), cation into a separate suborder. Cracraft (1981, or present in a wide range of other birds (e. g., 2001) assumed that this familyis the sister the pelvic muscle formula, arrangement of the taxon of Nyctibiidae and Caprimulgidae but, flexor tendons, nude oil gland). Despite this again, the characters he listed in order to sup- obvious lack of autapomorphic characters, the port monophyly of Steatornithidae, Nyctibii- traditional order Caprimulgiformes was con- dae, and Caprimulgidae are either not present sidered monophyletic by all recent and most in all three taxa (contraryto his statement, the earlier authors. Among the few exceptions are caudal margin of the sternum of the Nyctibii- Huxley(1867) who separated the Podargidae dae does not bear a single lateral process but from Nyctibiidae, Caprimulgidae, and Aego- exhibits two pairs of incisions) or plesiomor- thelidae, and Sharpe (1900) who separated phic (presence of processus basipterygoidei, Steatornithidae, Podargidae, and Aegothelidae see below). Curiously, Cracraft (1988: 354) from Nyctibiidae and Caprimulgidae in his lin- stated that ªthe steatornithids are seemingly ear classification. [. .] primitive relative to the other four fami- The phylogenetic relationships between the liesº. caprimulgiform families also are poorlyre- Recent molecular phylogenetic studies do solved. Most authors based their studies on not support either monophyly of Caprimulgi- comparisons with Steatornithidae, Podargidae, dae and Nyctibiidae, or monophyly of Podargi- and Caprimulgidae, whereas published ac- dae and Aegothelidae. The DNA-DNA hybrid- counts of the anatomyof Nyctibiidaeand Ae- ization studies of Sibley& Ahlquist (1990) gothelidae are exceedinglyrare. Although only suggested monophyly of the taxon (Caprimul- Cracraft (1981) presented a formal phyloge- gidae + (Nyctibiidae + Steatornithidae)), with netic hypothesis based on morphological char- the Aegothelidae as the most basal taxon of re- acters, generallyNyctibiidaeand Caprimulgi- cent Caprimulgiformes. A phylogenetic analy- dae on the one hand, and Aegothelidae and sis using the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene Podargidae on the other were considered to be byMariaux & Braun (1996) showed the taxon 84 Journal fuÈr Ornithologie 143, 2002 (Nyctibiidae + (Caprimulgidae + Aegotheli- teros (2000) did confirm monophyly of Capri- dae)) to be monophyletic with the Steatornithi- mulgiformes and Apodiformes in most of the dae as the sister taxon of all other Caprimul- different trees that were presented (in the anal- giformes. Both studies supported an early yses of Bleiweiss et al. 1994, Mindell et al. branching of the Podargidae (which branch 1997, and Espinosa de los Monteros 2000 only just after the Aegothelidae respectivelyStea- the Caprimulgidae were included). tornithidae in the phylogenies of Sibley & Ahl- Further strong evidence for a close relation- quist and Mariaux & Braun). An analysis by ship between the apodiform and (at least some) Johansson et al. (2001) using nuclear DNA se- caprimulgiform birds comes from the well quences did not corroborate monophyly of known osteologyof the Aegialornithidae, an Steatornithidae, Podargidae, Nyctibiidae, and Eocene familyof basal swifts. The Aegialorni- Caprimulgidae (the Aegothelidae were not in- thidae (which are considered to be apodiform cluded in the analysis). However, the proposed byvirtuallyall recent authors, e. g. Olson phylogenetic positions of these taxa received 1985, Peters 1985, Karhu 1988, Mourer-Chau- onlyweak statistical support and are thus not vire 1988a) not onlycloselyresemble the re- discussed in the following. cent Caprimulgidae and Aegothelidae in their Concerning their higher systematic position osteology(see Olson 1985 and below), but are most authors considered the Caprimulgiformes also verysimilar to the roughlycontemporane- to be most closelyrelated either to owls (Stri- ous extinct caprimulgiform familyArchaeo- giformes) or to swifts and hummingbirds trogonidae (Mourer-Chauvire 1980, 1995). On (Apodiformes) (see Sibley& Ahlquist 1990). the other hand, there are no derived similarities However, morphological similarities between between earlyTertiaryowls and contempo- caprimulgiform birds and owls have mainly raneous caprimulgiform birds, nor derived been found if comparisons were made with Po- morphological characters which support dargidae and Steatornithidae (e. g., FuÈrbringer monophyly of owls and the traditional order 1888, Verheyen 1956), whereas the other fami- Caprimulgiformes. lies share derived characters with the Apodi- I attempted to analyze the exact phyloge- formes. Although the DNA-DNA hybridiza- netic relationships between apodiform and tion studies of Sibley& Ahlquist (1990) and caprimulgiform birds. The proposed relation- Bleiweiss et al. (1994) also resulted in mono- ships are shown in a cladogram, all nodes of phyly of the taxon
Recommended publications
  • Rivoli's Hummingbird: Eugenes Fulgens Donald R
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Department of Biology and Department of Biology and Chemistry Chemistry 6-27-2018 Rivoli's Hummingbird: Eugenes fulgens Donald R. Powers George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Poultry or Avian Science Commons Recommended Citation Powers, Donald R., "Rivoli's Hummingbird: Eugenes fulgens" (2018). Faculty Publications - Department of Biology and Chemistry. 123. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/bio_fac/123 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology and Chemistry at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Department of Biology and Chemistry by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rivoli's Hummingbird Eugenes fulgens Order: CAPRIMULGIFORMES Family: TROCHILIDAE Version: 2.1 — Published June 27, 2018 Donald R. Powers Introduction Rivoli's Hummingbird was named in honor of the Duke of Rivoli when the species was described by René Lesson in 1829 (1). Even when it became known that William Swainson had written an earlier description of this species in 1827, the common name Rivoli's Hummingbird remained until the early 1980s, when it was changed to Magnificent Hummingbird. In 2017, however, the name was restored to Rivoli's Hummingbird when the American Ornithological Society officially recognized Eugenes fulgens as a distinct species from E. spectabilis, the Talamanca Hummingbird, of the highlands of Costa Rica and western Panama (2). See Systematics: Related Species.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the White-Winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus Candicans) in Eastern Paraguay
    Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 22(2), 219-233 ARTICLE June 2014 Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay Robert G. Pople Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK. Email: [email protected] Current address: BirdLife International, Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge, CB3 0NA, UK. Received on 03 September 2013. Accepted on 02 October 2013. ABSTRACT: Breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans) in eastern Paraguay. I present the first detailed description of the breeding biology of the White-winged Nightjar (Eleothreptus candicans), based on data collected over three breeding seasons during 1998-2001 at Aguará Ñu, Canindeyú, eastern Paraguay. Male nightjars defended small territories situated on the upper slopes of ridgelines. Each territory contained one or more “display arenas” at which the male performed nuptial display flights. Aggregation indices confirmed that the primary display arenas of males were significantly clustered within the survey area. Within their territories, males apparently selected display arenas on the basis of their structural characteristics: mounds used as arenas were significantly lower and broader than random mounds. Males engaged in display activity from late August to early January. On average, males performed 0.54 ± 0.04 display flights per minute during nocturnal focal watches, but there was considerable intra-male variation in display rate. Following a burst of activity immediately after their arrival at display arenas at dusk, male display rate was best explained by ambient levels of moonlight. Males produced a previously undescribed insect-like “tik tik” call when inactive on their territories.
    [Show full text]
  • Aullwood's Birds (PDF)
    Aullwood's Bird List This list was collected over many years and includes birds that have been seen at or very near Aullwood. The list includes some which are seen only every other year or so, along with others that are seen year around. Ciconiiformes Great blue heron Green heron Black-crowned night heron Anseriformes Canada goose Mallard Blue-winged teal Wood duck Falconiformes Turkey vulture Osprey Sharp-shinned hawk Cooper's hawk Red-tailed hawk Red-shouldered hawk Broad-winged hawk Rough-legged hawk Marsh hawk American kestrel Galliformes Bobwhite Ring-necked pheasant Gruiformes Sandhill crane American coot Charadriformes Killdeer American woodcock Common snipe Spotted sandpiper Solitary sandpiper Ring-billed gull Columbiformes Rock dove Mourning dove Cuculiformes Yellow-billed cuckoo Strigiformes Screech owl Great horned owl Barred owl Saw-whet owl Caprimulgiformes Common nighthawk Apodiformes Chimney swift Ruby-throated hummingbird Coraciformes Belted kinghisher Piciformes Common flicker Pileated woodpecker Red-bellied woodpecker Red-headed woodpecker Yellow-bellied sapsucker Hairy woodpecker Downy woodpecker Passeriformes Eastern kingbird Great crested flycatcher Eastern phoebe Yellow-bellied flycatcher Acadian flycatcher Willow flycatcher Least flycatcher Eastern wood pewee Olive-sided flycatcher Tree swallow Bank swallow Rough-winged swallow Barn swallow Purple martin Blue jay Common crow Black-capped chickadee Carolina chickadee Tufted titmouse White-breasted nuthatch Red-breasted nuthatch Brown creeper House wren Winter wren
    [Show full text]
  • On the Genus Pseudolynchia Bequaert
    Pacific Insects Monograph 10: 125-138 November 30, 1966 ON THE GENUS PSEUDOLYNCHIA BEQUAERT (Diptera : Hippoboscidae) * By T. C. Maa2 Abstract: Pseudolynchia serratipes from New Guinea is described as new. Known species are redescribed together with suggestion of several new characters including sensoria on hind tibiae and sensilla on hind tarsi. A new key to species and remarks on the inter- and intrageneric relationships are appended. Since erected in 1926, Pseudolynchia has been the subject of several regional and world revisions (Bequaert 1926 b, 1935 a, 1938 d, 1955; Maa 1963; Theodor & Oldroyd 1964). Comprehensive bibliographies and digest of literature on the biology of the species have also been provided by Bequaert (1953 a, 1953 b, 1955). The following notes include chiefly a description of an unusual new species, and redescriptions of known ones. Generic Characters. To the detailed descriptions by Bequaert (1955) and Theodor et al (1964), the following points may be added: Hind tibia with a group of large sensoria on posterior surface near apex. Segments 2 to 4 of hind tarsus slightly to strongly asymmetrical, each with 2 longitudinal series of sensilla. Parameres ($) un­ usually strongly articulated with aedeagal apodeme and gonocoxal base, their common basal margin deeply concave; aedeagal apodeme in sexually matured 8 quite long and narrow in lateral view. Male differing from 9 in having wing shorter and broader in proportion, fore and mid tarsi ventrally with more apical spines, segment 1 of mid tarsus ventrally with a small patch of short, stout, and either sharp or peg-like spines (absent in 9), tergite 5 almost always represented by a pair of small transverse plates (not definable in 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK
    Technical Assistance Report Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK - Sapo National Park -Vision Statement By the year 2010, a fully restored biodiversity, and well-maintained, properly managed Sapo National Park, with increased public understanding and acceptance, and improved quality of life in communities surrounding the Park. A Cooperative Accomplishment of USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon- USDA Forest Service May 29, 2005 to June 17, 2005 - 1 - USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Protected Area Development Management Plan Development Technical Assistance Report Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon 17 June 2005 Goal Provide support to the FDA, CI and FFI to review and update the Sapo NP management plan, establish a management plan template, develop a program of activities for implementing the plan, and train FDA staff in developing future management plans. Summary Week 1 – Arrived in Monrovia on 29 May and met with Forestry Development Authority (FDA) staff and our two counterpart hosts, Theo Freeman and Morris Kamara, heads of the Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management and Protected Area Management respectively. We decided to concentrate on the immediate implementation needs for Sapo NP rather than a revision of existing management plan. The four of us, along with Tyler Christie of Conservation International (CI), worked in the CI office on the following topics: FDA Immediate
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Metabolism and Body Temperature in the Blue-Naped Mousebird (Urocolius Macrourus) During Torpor
    Ornis Fennica 76:211-219 . 1999 Energy metabolism and body temperature in the Blue-naped Mousebird (Urocolius macrourus) during torpor Ralph Schaub, Roland Prinzinger and Elke Schleucher Schaub, R., Prinzinger, R. &Schleucher, E., AK Stoffwechselphysiologie, Zoologisches Institut, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitdt, Siesmayerstra²e 70, 60323 Frankfurt/ Main, Germany Received 13 March 1998, accepted IS September 1999 Mousebirds (Coliiformes) respond to cold exposure and food limitation with nightly bouts of torpor. During torpor, metabolic rate and body temperature decrease mark- edly, which results in energy savings. The decrease in body temperature is a regulated phenomenon as is also the arousal which occurs spontaneously without external stimuli. During arousal, Blue-naped Mousebirds warm at a rate of 1 °C/min . This process requires significant amounts of energy . Our calculations show that the overall savings for the whole day are 30% at an ambient temperature of 15°C when daylength is 10 hours . Using glucose assays and RQ measurements, we found that during fasting, the birds switch to non-carbohydrate metabolism at an early phase of the day . This may be one of triggers eliciting torpor. By using cluster analysis of glucose levels we could clearly divide the night phase into a period of effective energy saving (high glucose levels) and arousal (low glucose levels) . 1 . Introduction 1972) . This kind of nutrition is low in energy, so the birds may face periods of energy deficiency The aim of this study is to get information about (Schifter 1972). To survive these times of starva- the daily energy demand and the thermal regula- tion, they have developed a special physiological tion in small birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklist
    Checklist of Birds of the National Butterfly Center Mission, Hidalgo County Texas (289 Species + 3 Forms) *indicates confirmed nesting UPDATED: September 28, 2021 Common Name (English) Scientific Name Spanish Name Order Anseriformes, Waterfowl Family Anatidae, Tree Ducks, Ducks, and Geese Black-bellied Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna autumnalis Pijije Alas Blancas Fulvous Whistling-Duck Dendrocygna bicolor Pijije Canelo Snow Goose Anser caerulescens Ganso Blanco Ross's Goose Anser rossii Ganso de Ross Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons Ganso Careto Mayor Canada Goose Branta canadensis Ganso Canadiense Mayor Muscovy Duck (Domestic type) Cairina moschata Pato Real (doméstico) Wood Duck Aix sponsa Pato Arcoíris Blue-winged Teal Spatula discors Cerceta Alas Azules Cinnamon Teal Spatula cyanoptera Cerceta Canela Northern Shoveler Spatula clypeata Pato Cucharón Norteño Gadwall Mareca strepera Pato Friso American Wigeon Mareca americana Pato Chalcuán Mexican Duck Anas (platyrhynchos) diazi Pato Mexicano Mottled Duck Anas fulvigula Pato Tejano Northern Pintail Anas acuta Pato Golondrino Green-winged Teal Anas crecca Cerceta Alas Verdes Canvasback Aythya valisineria Pato Coacoxtle Redhead Aythya americana Pato Cabeza Roja Ring-necked Duck Aythya collaris Pato Pico Anillado Lesser Scaup Aythya affinis Pato Boludo Menor Bufflehead Bucephala albeola Pato Monja Ruddy Duck Oxyura jamaicensis Pato Tepalcate Order Galliformes, Upland Game Birds Family Cracidae, Guans and Chachalacas Plain Chachalaca Ortalis vetula Chachalaca Norteña Family Odontophoridae,
    [Show full text]
  • How Birds Combat Ectoparasites
    The Open Ornithology Journal, 2010, 3, 41-71 41 Open Access How Birds Combat Ectoparasites Dale H. Clayton*,1, Jennifer A. H. Koop1, Christopher W. Harbison1,2, Brett R. Moyer1,3 and Sarah E. Bush1,4 1Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA; 2Current address: Biology Department, Siena College, Loudonville, NY, 12211, USA; 3Current address: Providence Day School, Charlotte, NC, 28270, USA; 4Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA Abstract: Birds are plagued by an impressive diversity of ectoparasites, ranging from feather-feeding lice, to feather- degrading bacteria. Many of these ectoparasites have severe negative effects on host fitness. It is therefore not surprising that selection on birds has favored a variety of possible adaptations for dealing with ectoparasites. The functional signifi- cance of some of these defenses has been well documented. Others have barely been studied, much less tested rigorously. In this article we review the evidence - or lack thereof - for many of the purported mechanisms birds have for dealing with ectoparasites. We concentrate on features of the plumage and its components, as well as anti-parasite behaviors. In some cases, we present original data from our own recent work. We make recommendations for future studies that could im- prove our understanding of this poorly known aspect of avian biology. Keywords: Grooming, preening, dusting, sunning, molt, oil, anting, fumigation. INTRODUCTION 2) Mites and ticks (Acari): many families [6-9]. As a class, birds (Aves) are the most thoroughly studied 3) Leeches: four families [10]. group of organisms on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Bird List
    2020 NATIONAL BIRD LIST See General Rules, Eye Protection & other Policies on www.soinc.org as they apply to every event. Kingdom – ANIMALIA Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias ORDER: Charadriiformes Phylum – CHORDATA Snowy Egret Egretta thula Lapwings and Plovers (Charadriidae) Green Heron American Golden-Plover Subphylum – VERTEBRATA Black-crowned Night-heron Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Class - AVES Ibises and Spoonbills Oystercatchers (Haematopodidae) Family Group (Family Name) (Threskiornithidae) American Oystercatcher Common Name [Scientifc name Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja Stilts and Avocets (Recurvirostridae) is in italics] Black-necked Stilt ORDER: Anseriformes ORDER: Suliformes American Avocet Recurvirostra Ducks, Geese, and Swans (Anatidae) Cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae) americana Black-bellied Whistling-duck Double-crested Cormorant Sandpipers, Phalaropes, and Allies Snow Goose Phalacrocorax auritus (Scolopacidae) Canada Goose Branta canadensis Darters (Anhingidae) Spotted Sandpiper Trumpeter Swan Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Ruddy Turnstone Wood Duck Aix sponsa Frigatebirds (Fregatidae) Dunlin Calidris alpina Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Magnifcent Frigatebird Wilson’s Snipe Northern Shoveler American Woodcock Scolopax minor Green-winged Teal ORDER: Ciconiiformes Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers (Laridae) Canvasback Deep-water Waders (Ciconiidae) Laughing Gull Hooded Merganser Wood Stork Ring-billed Gull Herring Gull Larus argentatus ORDER: Galliformes ORDER: Falconiformes Least Tern Sternula antillarum Partridges, Grouse, Turkeys, and
    [Show full text]
  • Conjugate and Disjunctive Saccades in Contrasting Oculomotor
    0270-6474/0506-i 418$02.00/O The Journal of Neuroscmce Copyright 0 Society for Neuroscience Vol. 5. No. 6 pp. 1418-1428 Printed m U.S.A. June 1985 Conjugate and Disjunctive Saccades in Two Avian Species with Contrasting Oculomotor Strategies’ JOSH WALLMAN* AND JOHN D. PETTIGREWS3 *Department of Biology, City College of City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, and *National Vision Research institute of Australia, 386 Cardigan Street, Car/ton 3052, Australia Abstract intervals. We hypothesize that saccades have such an endogenous pattern in time and space, and that this pattern represents an We have recorded with the magnetic search coil method oculomotor strategy for a species. the spontaneous saccades of two species of predatory birds, As a start in investigating this hypothesis, we have taken advan- which differ in the relative importance of panoramic and tage of the diversity of avian visual adaptations by studying spon- fovea1 vision. The little eagle (Haliaetus morphnoides) hunts taneous saccades made by two species, the tawny frogmouth and from great heights and has no predators, whereas the tawny the little eagle, which we presume have different oculomotor require- frogmouth (Podargus strigoides) hunts from perches near the ments, particularly with respect to binocular coordination. The sac- ground, is preyed upon, and frequently adopts an immobile cades of both eyes were studied as the animals freely viewed the camouflage posture. laboratory with their heads restrained. Although this situation is of We find that both birds spend most of the time with their course far from what the animals would experience in their natural eyes confined to a small region of gaze, the primary position circumstances, it provides an opportunity to compare the two of gaze; in this position, the visual axes are much more species under identical conditions without the complication of differ- diverged in the frogmouth than in the eagle, thereby giving it ences in head movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Diversification of Birds
    Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • MD-Birds-2021-Envirothon-3Pp
    3/23/2021 Maryland Envirothon: Class Aves KERRY WIXTED WILDLIFE AND HERITAGE SERVICE March 2021 1 Aves Overview •> 450 species in Maryland •Extirpated species include: ◦Bewick’s Wren ◦Greater Prairie Chicken ◦Red-cockaded Woodpecker American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) chick by Kerry Wixted Note: This guide is an overview of select species found in Maryland. The taxonomy and descriptions are based off Peterson Field Guide to Birds of Eastern and Central North America, 6th Ed. 2 Order: Anseriformes • Web-footed waterfowl • Family Anatidae • Ducks, geese & swans Male Wood Duck (Aix sponsa) Order: Anseriformes; Family Anatidae 3 1 3/23/2021 Cygnus- Swans Mute Swan Tundra Swan Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus olor) (Cygnus columbianus) (Cygnus buccinator) Invasive. Adult black-knobbed orange Winter resident. Adult bill black, usually Winter resident. Adult all black bill bill tilts down; immature is dingy with with small yellow basal spot; immature with straight ridge; more nasal calls is dingy in color with pinkish bill; makes than tundra swan pinkish bill; makes hissing sounds mellow-high pitched woo-ho, woo-woo noise Order: Anseriformes; Family Anatidae By Matthew Beziat CC by NC 2.0 By Jen Goellnitz CC by NC 2.0 4 Dabbling Ducks- feed by dabbling & upending Male Female , Maryland Biodiversity Project Biodiversity ,Maryland Hubick By Bill Bill By By Kerry Wixted Kerry By American Black Duck (Anas rubripes) Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) Year-round resident. Dusky black duck with white wing linings Year-round resident. Adult males have green head w/ evident in flight; resembles a female mallard but has black white neck ring & females are mottled in color ; borders on secondary wing feathers; can hybridize with resembles an American Black Duck mallard but has mallards white borders on secondary wing feathers Order: Anseriformes; Family Anatidae 5 Diving Ducks- feed by diving; legs close to tail CC by NC NC 2.0CC by Beziat By Judy Gallagher CC by by 2.0CC Gallagher Judy By By Matthew Matthew By Canvasback (Aythya valisneria) Redhead (Aythya americana) Winter resident.
    [Show full text]