DOCSLIB.ORG

May 12, 2021 – 5:30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room 140 19Th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
May 12, 2021 – 5:30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room 140 19Th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA AGENDA Wednesday – May 12, 2021 – 5:30 PM Douglas County Public Services Building Hearing Room 140 19th Street NW, East Wenatchee, WA NOTICE, in consideration of the current COVID-19 pandemic the meeting is closed to in person attendance. The meeting will be held via Zoom teleconference, attend by phone at 1-253-215-8782, Meeting ID: 937 9170 7816, Password: 520623 or online at: https://zoom.us/j/93791707816?pwd=c25FOGo4QlpUZ3BzME0xek1TMy9hQT09 I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER – Roll Call of Planning Commissioners II. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES a) Review minutes of the April 14, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. III. CITIZEN COMMENT The planning commission will allocate 15 minutes for citizen comments regarding items not related to the current agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS - NONE V. NEW BUSINESS a) A joint Douglas County, WA Department of Ecology public hearing on limited amendments to Douglas County Shoreline Master Program. The proposed amendments are the result of the periodic review process required by RCW Chapter 90.58.080(4). b) A public hearing to consider adopting City of East Wenatchee Ordinances 2021-05, 2021-06 and 2021-08 regarding amendments to the Greater East Wenatchee Area Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code as they apply to the unincorporated portions of the City’s urban growth area. VI. Adjourn Planning Commission meeting materials available at: http://www.douglascountywa.net/311/Planning-Commission DOUGLAS COUNTY TRANSPORTATION & LAND SERVICES 140 19TH STREET NW, SUITE A • EAST WENATCHEE, WA 98802 PHONE: 509/884-7173 • FAX: 509/886-3954 www.douglascountywa.net Douglas County Planning Commission ACTION MINUTES Wednesday, April 14, 2021 Meeting held via Zoom online meeting platform I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Vice Chair Michael Machado at 5:31 P.M. Douglas County Planning Commission Members Present: Tanya Davis, Michael Machado, Robert Knowles, Dan Beardslee, Molly Linville and David Dufenhorst Douglas County Staff Present: Land Services Director, Mark Botello County Engineer, Aaron Simmons Curtis Lillquist, Principal Planner II. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES a) Review minutes from the March 10, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Molly Linville made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner David Dufenhorst seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. III. CITIZEN COMMENT - None IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. NEW BUSINESS a) A workshop for the planning commission to receive public comment on the proposed amendments to the Douglas County Shoreline Master Program for the required periodic review. Principal Planner Lillquist and the consultant team from Anchor QEA gave a presentation reviewing the proposed changes to the shoreline master program resulting from the required periodic review. 1 Comment was received from the following members of the public: - Eric Pentico, WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife - Larry Lehman Pamela Kromholtz inquired if the proposed changes would have any effect on her ability to expand her deck on the water side of her home. b) A public hearing to consider amendments to DCC Title 12 Road Standards amending the Primitive Roads – Unopened Rights-of-way section County Engineer Aaron Simmons gave a presentation of the April 1, 2021 staff report. The following findings and conclusions were entered into the record: Findings of Fact: 1. Douglas County has adopted a Countywide Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the Growth Management Act (GMA) and RCW Chapter 36.70A, and a series of subarea plans for each municipality in the county. These plans have been found to be consistent with each other. 2. Amendments to Title 12 of the Douglas County Code and the SEPA threshold determination and supporting documentation were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, on October 22, 2019. 3. RCW Chapters 36.70 and 36.70A authorize the adoption of amendments the comprehensive plan and development regulations. 4. The Planning Commission is responsible for long range planning matters and providing implementation recommendations to assure compliance with the Growth Management Act. 5. WAC Chapter 51-54A-008 states that “The IFC shall become effective in all counties on 7/1/2016.” 6. RCW Chapter 19.27.110 states that “Each county government shall administer and enforce the IFC in unincorporated areas.” 7. RCW 36.86.020 states that “In the case of roads, the minimum width between shoulders shall be 14 feet with 8 feet of surfacing.” 8. DCC 15.08.010 adopts IFC, Appendix D, Fire Apparatus Access Road.” 9. DCC 15.24.030 states that “Fire apparatus access roads, when required, shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with Chapter 5 of the IFC.” 10. No comments have been received from agencies. 11. No comments have been received from private citizens. 12. The Planning Commission conducted an advertised public hearing on April 14, 2021. The Planning Commission entered into the record the files on this amendment, accepted public testimony, and deliberated the merits of the proposal. 13. The Planning Commission has reviewed the entire record including the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan and public testimony as it relates to the proposed development regulations. 2 Conclusions: 1. The procedural and substantive requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act, RCW 36.70A, and DCC Title 14 have been complied with. 2. The Douglas County Countywide Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are consistent with each other. 3. The Douglas County Comprehensive Plan and development regulations are consistent with the Growth Management Act, the Regional Policy Plan, and the adopted comprehensive plans for the cities and towns of Bridgeport, East Wenatchee, Mansfield, Rock Island, and Waterville. 4. Douglas County completed a review of the development regulations as needed to satisfy the requirements of RCW 36.70A.130. No public comment was submitted during the hearing. Commissioner Dan Beardslee moved to recommend approval of the amendments. Commissioner Robert Knowles seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. VI. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:53 P.M. 3 STAFF REPORT TO: Douglas County Planning Commission FROM: Douglas County Land Services Staff DATE:6B April 30, 2021 I. REQUESTED0B ACTION Formulate a recommendation to the Board of Commissioners regarding draft-limited amendments to the Douglas County Shoreline Master Program (SMP) to complete the periodic update mandated by RCW 90.58.080. The limited amendments are: Revisions to ensure consistency with state law and rules amended since County adoption in 2014. Revisions to facilitate better consistency between the master program and the Douglas County Zoning Code (i.e. side yard setbacks, density requirements). Revisions to Administrative provisions. Other limited amendments including definitions; provisions to address wildfire and handicap access; and edits to improve clarity. A summary of the proposed amendments are found in the WA Dept. of Ecology’s Periodic Review Checklist found in Attachment A. The specific text of the proposed amendments are included with this staff report in Attachment D. II. ENVIRONMENTAL1B REVIEW Douglas County Issued a Determination of Non-significance on February 25, 2021. III. PUBLIC3BP PROCESS Notice for the public workshops, public comment periods and the public hearing were emailed to the agencies and individuals on the shoreline master program amendment interested parties list. Notice for the public comment periods and public hearing were published in the Wenatchee World and Empire Press. The draft amendments were made available on the Douglas County website and at the Douglas County Public Services Building in East Wenatchee. Public review followed the timeline below: September 23, 2020 – Douglas County held a public workshop to provide information about the periodic review process and solicit early input from the public regarding potential amendments to the shoreline master program. March 1, 2021 – Douglas County submitted the limited amendments to the Washington State Department of Commerce and to the public for 60 day review in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106. 2021 SMP Periodic Update Staff Report Page 1 March 10, 2021 – Douglas County Planning Commission workshop to review proposed amendments. April 8, 2021 – Douglas County submitted the limited amendments to the Washington State Department of Ecology and to the public for 30-day review in accordance with WAC 173-26-100. April 14, 2021 – Douglas County Planning Commission Workshop to receive public comment. May 12, 2021 – Douglas County Planning Commission/WA Department of Ecology Joint Public Hearing. IV. APPLICABLE POLICY RCW 90.58.020 Legislative findings – State policy enunciated – User preference It is the policy of the State to provide for the management of the shorelines of the State by planning for and fostering all reasonable and appropriate uses. This policy is designed to insure the development of these shorelines in a manner which, while allowing for limited reduction of rights of the public in the navigable waters, will promote and enhance the public interest. This policy contemplates protecting against adverse effects to the public health, the land and its vegetation and wildlife, and the waters of the State and their aquatic life, while protecting generally public rights of navigation and corollary rights incidental thereto. The legislature declares that the interest of all of the people shall be paramount in the management of shorelines of statewide
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chief Joseph Hatchery Program
    Chief Joseph Hatchery Program Draft Environmental Impact Statement DOE/EIS-0384 May 2007 Chief Joseph Hatchery Program Responsible Agency: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) Title of Proposed Project: Chief Joseph Hatchery Program Cooperating Tribe: Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation State Involved: Washington Abstract: The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) describes a Chinook salmon hatchery production program sponsored by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (Colville Tribes). BPA proposes to fund the construction, operation and maintenance of the program to help mitigate for anadromous fish affected by the Federal Columbia River Power System dams on the Columbia River. The Colville Tribes want to produce adequate salmon to sustain tribal ceremonial and subsistence fisheries and enhance the potential for a recreational fishery for the general public. The DEIS discloses the environmental effects expected from facility construction and program operations and a No Action alternative. The Proposed Action is to build a hatchery near the base of Chief Joseph Dam on the Columbia River for incubation, rearing and release of summer/fall and spring Chinook. Along the Okanogan River, three existing irrigation ponds, one existing salmon acclimation pond, and two new acclimation ponds (to be built) would be used for final rearing, imprinting and volitional release of chinook smolts. The Chief Joseph Dam Hatchery Program Master Plan (Master Plan, Northwest Power and Conservation Council, May 2004) provides voluminous information on program features. The US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, Oroville-Tonasket Irrigation District, and others have cooperated on project design and siting.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff
    August 2018 Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan Acknowledgements Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Planning Team Members Plan Leadership and Content Development Ron Fox, Wildlife Area Manager Ron Fox, Chelan Wildlife Area Manager Rich Finger, Region Two Lands Operation Manager Lauri Vigue, Lead Lands Planner Graham Simon, Habitat Biologist Melinda Posner, Wildlife Area Planning, David Volsen, District Wildlife Biologist Recreation and Outreach Section Manager Travis Maitland, Fish District Biologist Cynthia Wilkerson, Lands Division Manager Eric Oswald, Enforcement Document Production Dan Klump, Enforcement Peggy Ushakoff, Public Affairs Mark Teske, Environmental Planner Michelle Dunlop, Public Affairs Rod Pfeifle, Forester Matthew Trenda, Wildlife Program Administration Mapping Support John Talmadge, GIS Shelly Snyder, GIS Chelan Wildlife Area Advisory Committee Roster Name Organization City Bill Stegeman Wenatchee Sportsmen’s Association Wenatchee Sam Lain Upland Bird Hunter Chelan Graham Grant Washington Wild Sheep Foundation Wenatchee Jason Lundgren Cascade Columbia Fisheries Enhancement Group Wenatchee Dan Smith North Cascades Washington Audubon Chelan Von Pope Chelan Public Utilities District Wenatchee Erik Ellis Bureau of Land Management Wenatchee Ana Cerro-Timpone Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Entiat Paul Willard Lake Chelan Trails Alliance/Evergreen Bike Alliance Mason Cover Photos: Chelan Butte Unit by Justin Haug, bighorn sheep rams by Beau Patterson, Beebe Springs western meadowlark by Alan Bauer and Bighorns in the Swakane by Justin Haug 2 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chelan Wildlife Area Kelly Susewind, Director, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan August 2018 Chelan Wildlife Area Management Plan 3 Table of Contents Table of Contents . 4 List of Acronyms & Abbreviations . 6 Part 1 - Wildlife Area Planning Overview .
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pateros Relocation Guide
    Visit pateros.com ‖ Contact Pateros City Hall @ 509.923.2571 ‖ 2020 City of Pateros Relocation Guide PATEROS & THE SUNNY OKANOGAN Pateros, population 685, is a small riverfront community in the heart of North Central Washington. Pateros is located in the foothills of the Cascades and the confluence of the Columbia and Methow River, and serves as recreation basecamp for the eastern slopes of the Cascades; the Methow, Okanogan, and Columbia river basins; and the desert landscapes North Central Washington of eastern Washington. To the north is the wild and rugged Corridor that ends at the Grand Coulee Dam. Okanogan Highlands, Omak, and the Canadian Twenty minutes to the south lies the tourist Border. To the east is home of the Colville destination Lake Chelan and it’s Mediterranean‐ Confederated Tribes, Nespelem, and the Coulee like wine country. To the north east the Cascade Leave the frantic blur of counting-time behind. Visit, explore Pateros and savor the moment, or live simply in Pateros and savor life. Pateros ‐ at the confluence of the Methow and Columbia Rivers Visit pateros.com ‖ Contact Pateros City Hall @ 509.923.2571 ‖ 2020 City of Pateros Relocation Guide Loop winds through the Methow Valley, through the logging town of Twisp, and the Western Town of Winthrop, on its way to Liberty Bell Mountain at the top of Washington Pass. Okanogan County is Washington’s largest county, larger than the state of Delaware, Connecticut, or Rhode Island. Public lands cover 70% of the county and the density of population is less than 8 persons per square mile.
    [Show full text]
  • Colville Indian Reservation Non-Member Sport Fishing Regulations
    Colville Indian Reservation Non-Member Sport Fishing Regulations APRIL 1, 2018 THROUGH MARCH 31, 2020 Contents PART I—INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO USE THIS BOOKLET ............................................. 2 PART II—PERMIT PROVISIONS ............................................................................................... 3 PART III—FISHING PERMIT FEES AND EXCEPTIONS ........................................................ 4 PART IV—GENERAL RULES ..................................................................................................... 5 PART V—SPECIAL RULES ......................................................................................................... 9 PART VI—DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................... 12 PART VII—OTHER INFORMATION RELATED TO FISHING ............................................. 14 PART VIII—FISH AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT 2018–2020 PERMIT OUTLETS ........ 15 PART IX-MAPS AND FIGURES ................................................................................................ 16 The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation (CCT or Colville Tribes) welcome you to the Colville Indian Reservation (Reservation). The Reservation encompasses over 1.4 million acres within Ferry and Okanogan counties in northeastern Washington State. The aquatic resources within the Reservation exist in a wide variety of climates, geographies, and habitats. Effective management of these diverse fisheries requires special regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Multple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 2005-2054
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MULTIPLE SPECIES GENERAL CONSERVATION PLAN DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared by: Eastern Washington Field Office U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and Foster Creek Conservation District Waterville, Washington October 2014 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MULTIPLE SPECIES GENERAL CONSERVATION PLAN FOR AGRICULTURE DOUGLAS COUNTY, WASHINGTON TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... iv CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ............................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION....................................................... 5 DECISIONS TO BE MADE ...................................................................................................... 5 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS, POLICIES, AND LAWS ........................................... 6 CHAPTER II - ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................................... 11 DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................ 11 SCOPING ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Assessment
    Wells Hydroelectric Project Tract 4 Shoreline Stabilization Project Okanogan County, Washington USFWS Consultation Code: 01EWFW00-2017-SLI-0165 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Prepared For: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County East Wenatchee, Washington Prepared by: January 26, 2016 Tract 4 Shoreline Stabilization Project Biological Assessment Tract 4 Shoreline Stabilization Project Document Title: Tract 4 Shoreline Stabilization Project Biological Assessment Date: 1/26/17 Client Name: Douglas County PUD Author: Craig Broadhead, Senior Biologist Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 123 East Yakima Ave, Ste. 250 Yakima, Washington 98901 www.jacobs.com 0 Tract 4 Shoreline Stabilization Project Biological Assessment Executive Summary Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County (Douglas PUD) needs to repair an eroding bank on the Columbia River south of Pateros, Washington. The erosion repair project (Project) will restore shoreline protection and enhance both terrestrial and aquatic habitat. The work supports Douglas PUD’s obligations under its Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license to operate the Wells Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 2149. The design incorporates biotic and abiotic elements to reduce erosion and increase shoreline stabilization and habitat values. These elements include placing a cobble and gravel berm below the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) to dissipate wave energy, constructing a layered coir fabric revetment to protect the shoreline and promote vegetation establishment, flattening steep eroded slopes, and replanting with native vegetation. All work below the OHWM will be completed in the dry during a reservoir drawdown period. Jacobs produced this Biological Assessment (BA) for the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) on behalf of Douglas PUD. The Project is proposed for construction in September 2017, and if possible will be completed concurrently with the Cassimer Bar Dike Breaching project located upstream.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Cumulative Impact Analysis Purpose This
    Cumulative Impact Analysis Purpose This section describes the general State requirements for cumulative impact analysis and discusses the methodology for analyzing potential impacts to Okanogan County shorelines . The draft Shoreline Master Program (SMP) proposes changes to the development regulations that encourage shoreline protection and avoidance, minimization and mitigation activities that would cause adverse impacts to shoreline functions and processes. The evaluation of cumulative impacts should consider: 1. Current circumstances affecting the shorelines and relevant natural processes. 2. Reasonably foreseeable future development and use of the shoreline. 3. Beneficial effects of any established regulatory programs under other local, state, and federal laws. The Shoreline Management Act guidelines require shoreline master programs to regulate new development and to maintain no net loss of shoreline ecological functions. While some impacts are immediate and can be directly addressed through avoidance and mitigation, other impacts are cumulative in nature. The composite of many similar actions over time may lead to a significant cumulative impact to the ecosystem. Key components of the SMP are the development of regulations and mitigation requirements. These requirements are important to achieving no net loss of shoreline ecological functions, but they cannot achieve this goal on their own. Other regulatory and non-regulatory programs are an additional component to achieving no net loss of ecological function. Assumptions This analysis is looking at foreseeable impacts over time. These impacts are being looked at by a group of Analysis Units (AUs) that represent a stream or lake reach. This method is consistent with the SMP Shoreline Characterization Report. The analysis focused on areas where greater development and land use change is expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Guide
    FISHING GUIDE Your guide to fishing in Okanogan Country. Where will you go first? Follow us on Social Media! 1 OKANOGANCOUNTRY.COM / 888-431-3080 To find more information about where fishing permits and license endorsements are available, visit: wdfw.wa.gov/licensing/fishing.html BEST TIME FOR BEST TIME FOR CATCH & RELEASE CATCH & KEEP FISHING OVERALL ICE FISHING 2 OkanoganCountry.com 888.431.3080 TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME........................................................ 4-5 THE METHOW REGION..................................... 6-11 Alta Lake..................................................................................................... 6 Big Twin Lake............................................................................................. 6 Patterson Lake........................................................................................... 8 Pearrygin Lake........................................................................................... 8 Methow River............................................................................................ 10 HEART OF THE OKANOGAN.............................. 12-17 Leader Lake.............................................................................................. 12 Green Lake................................................................................................ 13 Conconully Lake...................................................................................... 14 Conconully Reservoir.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Shoreline Master Program: Appendices a Through H (PDF)
    Appendix A. Inventory and analysis ............................................................................... 1 A.1 Ecosystem-wide processes and characterization ................................................ 1 A.2 Data inventory and materials ............................................................................. 13 A.3 Characterization ................................................................................................ 14 A.4 Analysis- reaches .............................................................................................. 19 A.5 Public access ..................................................................................................... 62 Appendix B. Restoration plan ......................................................................................... 1 B.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 B.2 Purpose and scope .............................................................................................. 1 B.3 Priority needs/areas ............................................................................................. 2 B.4. Existing efforts and programs ............................................................................. 9 B.5. Restoration goals and policies .......................................................................... 16 B.6. Implementation and monitoring ........................................................................ 18 Appendix C. Cumulative effects ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Reach Reservoir Water Quality Monitoring Work Plan
    ROCKY REACH RESERVOIR WATER QUALITY MONITORING WORK PLAN Prepared for PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF CHELAN COUNTY, WASHINGTON P.O. Box 1231 Wenatchee, Washington 98807-1231 Prepared by 5808 Lake Washington Blvd. NE, Suite 200 Kirkland, Washington 98033-7350 In association with RENSEL ASSOCIATES AQUATIC SCIENCE CONSULTANTS UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO October 1999 INTRODUCTION Relicensing of the Rocky Reach project requires a Water Quality Certification from the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) to comply with Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act. The fundamental requirement for 401 certification is to demonstrate that affected water bodies meet the State water quality standards, as defined by Chapter 173-201A WAC. In addition to the permit requirements, water quality monitoring is needed to provide adequate baseline information on the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of Rocky Reach Reservoir and the tailrace. This information will help define the relationships between water quality and beneficial uses, including fisheries, recreation, water supply, and aesthetics. Water quality monitoring objectives of the present study include the need to: · Compare existing water quality to Washington State standards; · Identify appropriate methods and approach for monitoring key parameters; · Relate the monitoring results to fisheries concerns and other uses of the reservoir; · Compare and contrast results to upstream and downstream conditions from other studies; and · Determine ongoing project-related impacts. Elements of the Rocky Reach Water Quality Monitoring program include a literature review of existing water quality and water rights information, one year of periodic water quality sample collection, laboratory analyses, sample data analyses and interpretation, and preparation of a Rocky Reach Water Quality Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1: Sections 1-7
    WELLS HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 2149 PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT (PAD) VOLUME 1: SECTIONS 1-7 Prepared by: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County 1151 Valley Mall Parkway East Wenatchee, WA 98802 www.douglaspud.org/relicensing December 2006 © Copyright 2006. Public Utility District No.1 of Douglas County. All Rights Reserved. For copies of this Pre-Application Document, contact: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County Attention: Relicensing 1151 Valley Mall Parkway East Wenatchee, WA 98802-4497 Phone: (509)884-7191 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2006. Public Utility District No.1 of Douglas County. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents AGENTS FOR DOUGLAS PUD..................................................................................................1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS......................................................................................2 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................4 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................5 2.0 PROCESS PLAN AND SCHEDULE...............................................................................7 2.1 Site Visit and Scoping Meetings..................................................................7 2.2 Participation in the ILP ................................................................................8 2.3 Communication Protocol.............................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Erosion Management Plan
    CHAPTER 1: ROCKY REACH SHORELINE EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN ROCKY REACH SHORELINE EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN Final ROCKY REACH HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC Project No. 2145 February 3, 2006 Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County Wenatchee, Washington Shoreline Erosion Management Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: ROCKY REACH SHORELINE EROSION MANAGEMENT PLAN ....... 1-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1-2 SECTION 2: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 1-2 SECTION 3: STUDIES AND EVALUATION OF PROJECT EFFECTS.................................................... 1-3 SECTION 4: PROTECTION, MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES ............................... 1-4 4.1 Objective 1: Demonstrate Appropriate Erosion Control Techniques......................................................... 1-4 4.2 Inform the Public About Erosion Control Methods ................................................................................... 1-5 4.3 Monitor Future Shoreline Erosion.............................................................................................................. 1-5 SECTION 5: LITERATURE CITED ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]