DOCSLIB.ORG

Prision Rules 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prision Rules 2018 1 GOVERNMENT OF THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA HOME AND TRIBAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION Peshawar, dated the 14th March 2018. No.SO(P&R)HD/3-3/2018.-In exercise of the powers conferred by section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894) and in supersession of rules issued in this behalf, the Government of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is pleased to make the following rules, namely: THE KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PRISONS RULES, 2018. Chapter-1 General Provision 1. Short title and commencement.---(1) These rules may be called the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Prisons Rules, 2018. (2) It shall come into force at once. 2. Definitions.---(1) In these rules, unless otherwise prescribed the following expressions shall have the meaning hereby respectively assigned to them, that is to say- (a) “Act” means the Prisons Act, 1894 (Act IX of 1894); (b) “Additional Inspector General” means Additional Inspector General of Prisons appointed by Government under these rules; (c) “Assistant Superintendent” means Assistant Superintendent of the Prisons and includes Senior Assistant Superintendent or Senior Lady Assistant Superintendent appointed by Government; (d) “Central Prison” means a Central Prison declared as such by Government; (e) “Chief Warder” means Chief Warder either male or female, as the case may be, in respective ward in a Prison; (f) “Code” means the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 (V of 1898); 2 (g) “condemned prisoner” means prisoner sentenced to death and his sentence of death confirmed by the Supreme Court of Pakistan; (h) “Court” means Supreme Court, High Court, the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Additional District and Sessions Judge or the Magistrate in a district, as the case may be; (i) “Department” means the Home and Tribal Affairs Department of Government; (j) “Deputy Commissioner” means the Deputy Commissioner of the district concerned; (k) “Deputy Inspector General” means Deputy Inspector General of Prisons appointed by Government; (l) “Deputy Superintendent” means the Deputy Superintendent of a Prison appointed by Government; (m) “District Prison” means any prison to which prisoners from one or more districts are in the first instance, ordinarily committed, and includes every prison other than a Central Prison or Special Prison; (n) “Government” means the Government of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; (o) “habitual criminal”, means- (i) any person convicted of an offence whose previous conviction or convictions under Chapter XII, XVI, XVII, or XVIII of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (Act No. XLV of 1860) taken by themselves or with the facts of the present case show that he habitually commits an offence or offences punishable under any or all of those chapters; (ii) any person committed to or detained in prison under section 123 read with section 110 of the Code; (iii) any person convicted of an offence punishable under sections 400 or 401 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (Act XLV of 1860); 3 (iv) any person convicted by a Court or tribunal acting outside Pakistan of an offence which would have rendered him liable to be classified as a habitual criminal if he had been convicted in a Court established in Pakistan; (v) for the purpose of this definition the word, “conviction” shall include an order made under section 118 read with section 110 of the Code; (vi) the classification of a convicted prisoner as a habitual criminal be made by the convicting Court, or the Deputy Commissioner as the case may be; (vii) any person classed as a habitual criminal may apply for the revision of the order to the sentencing Court; and (viii) every habitual criminal shall, as far as possible, be confined in a Special Prison in which no prisoner other than habitual criminal shall be kept, wherever such prison is declared by Government; and (p) “Head Warder” means the Head Warder of Prisons, either male or female, as the case may be, appointed by Government; (q) “High Security prison”, means a special structural building for confinement of very dangerous prisoners; (r) “high security zone”, means portion of any jail within a Prison for confinement of very dangerous and high profile prisoners; (s) “Inspector General”, means Inspector General of Prisons appointed by Government; (t) “Judge” means the District and Sessions Judge or Additional District and Sessions Judge of the district concerned; (u) “juvenile” means a prisoner who at the time of admission into prison or conviction, is under eighteen years of age; (v) “Judicial lockups”, mean a place of confinement of prisoners, the financial and administrative management of which is dealt by the Prison 4 Department while security by the Police Department; (w) “life imprisonment” means sentenced to imprisonment for life as defined in Code; (x) “Magistrate” means the Magistrate, as defined in clause (ma) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Code; (y) “mental prisoner” means an undertrail or convicted prisoner with learning disabilities or serious mental health disorder; (z) “Pharmacy Technician” include Senior Pharmacy Technician and Chief Pharmacy Technician and Junior Pharmacy Technician appointed by Government; (aa) “Physiologist” means Psychologist of the Prisons appointed by Government; (ab) “prisoner” includes all categories of prisoners as defined in these rules; (ac) “prisoner under sentence of death” means a prisoner sentenced to death by trial Court and his sentence of death has not yet been confirmed by High Court and Supreme Court of Pakistan, as the case may be; (ad) “Province” means the Province of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; (ae) “Medical Officer” means the Medical Officer of the Prison who is the Incharge of the medical administrator of prison except Central Prison; (af) “Secretary” means the Secretary to Government, Home and Tribal Affairs Department. (ag) “Senior Medical Officer” means the Senior Medical Officer of the Prisons, who is the Incharge of the medical administration of the Central Prison; (ah) “sentence “ means a sentence as finally fixed on appeal, revision or otherwise, and includes an aggregate of more sentences than one, and an order of committal to prison in default of furnishing security to keep the peace or be of good behaviour; (ai) “Special Prison” means Special Prison provided for the confinement of a particular class or classes of prisoners, and classed as Special Prison by Government; 5 (aj) “Sub-Prison”, means any prison other than Central Prison or District Prison; (ak) “subordinate officer” means every officer of a prison other than Superintendent; (al) “Superintendent” means Superintendent of a Prisons appointed by Government under these rules; (am) “under sentence prisoner” means a prisoner under sentence of imprisonment of either description; (an) “undertrial prisoner” means a civil or criminal, as the case may be, prisoner who is not a convicted prisoner and his case is under trial; (ao) “Warder” means a Warder either male or female appointed by Government; and (ap) “women prison” means a prison or portion of a prison used for confinement of female prisoners exclusively. (2) Words and expressions which are not defined in these rules, shall have the same meanings as assigned to them in the Act. 3. Definitions prescribed in rules under Prisons Act (Act II of 1984)---[Deleted] 6 Chapter-2 Classification of prisons 4. Types of prisons. ---Prisons shall be classified into Central Prisons, Special Prisons, District Prisons, Sub Jails, Judicial Lockups and High Security Prison. 5. Central Prison.---(1) A Central Prison shall have accommodation ordinarily for more than one thousand (1,000) prisoners irrespective of the length of sentences. There shall be a Central Prison in each Division of the Province. There may be Central Prison, as well as District Prison, subject to judicial lockup in each District, as Government may deem appropriate. (2) Government may, in its discretion, declare any Special Prison or District Prison to be a Central Prison. 6. Special Prisons.---(1) Government may, from time to time, declare any prison to be a Special Prison or establish a Special Prison at any place. (2) Women’s Prisons, open Prisons and Juvenile Training Centres, High Security prison shall be deemed to be Special Prisons under this rule. 7. District Prisons.---There shall be at least one District Prison in every District of the Province have accommodation up to eight hundred (800) prisoners. 8. Sub prison and Judicial Lockup.---(1) Sub prison and Judicial Lockup shall be deemed District prison for administrative purposes. (2) Sub Prison shall accommodate a convicted prisoner sentence upto three years and judicial lockup shall accommodate convicted prisoner sentence upto one year. 9. Central Prison may also be a District Prison.---Government may declare any Central Prison to be for all or any purposes a District Prison. 7 Chapter-3 Admission of Prisoners 10.---[Deleted] 11. Under-trial prisoner when received.---Under-trial prisoners shall not be admitted after the Prison has been locked-up for the night. They shall be received not later than the time mentioned below: From 1st April to 30th September 5 p.m. From 1st October to 31st March 4 p.m. 12. Prisoners received at night to be locked-up in a separate place.---Prisoners received after lock-up shall be confined in separate cells or any other suitable place provided for the night. Barracks shall not be opened for this purpose. 13. Prisoners to be received by an Assistant Superintendent.---(1) The Assistant Superintendent incharge of admission shall receive all prisoners brought to prison for admission during the day. Prisoners who arrive after lock-up or during the night on transfer from other prisons may be received by night duty officer. (2) Newly admitted prisoners shall be kept in quarantine or any other place declared by the Superintendent for not more than five days. 14. No prisoner to be admitted without a proper warrant.---No prisoner shall be admitted into any prison except under warrant or order of commitment issued by a competent Court addressed to the Superintendent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Penology and Prison Administration
    Penology and Prison Administration This course has been developed to enable the student to understand and critically evaluate the Pakistani penal system after developing an insight into the science of penology and the comparative penal systems. The course will introduce students to the various theories and perspectives that explain punishment and its role in societies. The main focus of the course will be on the prisons, both as a social institution and as society of captives. Students will also be introduced to models of prison management, administration and reform, and will analyze case studies from different countries that highlight specific issues. The course will survey the legal and institutional framework of prisons in Pakistan and introduce students to the scant scholarly literature that analyzes the present conditions of prisons in Pakistan. Learning Objectives Develop a basic understanding of the discipline of penology, the concept of punishment and its overall significance in the field of criminology. Provide a comparative overview of the history and development of the institution of Prison in the West. Functional aspects of the modern penitentiary with special emphasis of prison management, rehabilitation program and control technology will also be analyzed. Lastly, in the backdrop of globalization the perceivable future developmental trends in the western prison institution and their impact on globally marginalized groups and countries will be discussed. Understand the legal and structural framework of the Pakistani penal system from a comparative perspective. Understand the dynamics and determinants of the ‘Prison Society’ and its impact on the incarcerated. Apply this understanding in a critical analysis of the present conditions in the Pakistani prisons and their impact on the prisoners’ physical and mental health and re-entry into the mainstream society.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners of the Pandemic the Right to Health and Covid-19 in Pakistan’S Detention Facilities
    PRISONERS OF THE PANDEMIC THE RIGHT TO HEALTH AND COVID-19 IN PAKISTAN’S DETENTION FACILITIES Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. Justice Project Pakistan (JPP) is a non-profit organization based in Lahore that represents the most vulnerable Pakistani prisoners facing the harshest punishments, at home and abroad. JPP investigates, litigates, educates, and advocates on their behalf. In recognition of their work, JPP was awarded with the National Human Rights Award in December 2016 by the President of Pakistan. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: © Amnesty International and Justice Project Pakistan. Design by Ema Anis (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 33/3422/2020 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Organisations in Pakistan
    HRCP/CHRI 2010 POLICE ORGANISATIONS IN PAKISTAN Human Rights Commission CHRI of Pakistan Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative working for the practical realisation of human rights in the countries of the Commonwealth Human Rights Commission of Pakistan The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) is an independent, non-governmental organisation registered under the law. It is non-political and non-profit-making. Its main office is in Lahore. It started functioning in 1987. The highest organ of HRCP is the general body comprising all members. The general body meets at least once every year. Executive authority of this organisation vests in the Council elected every three years. The Council elects the organisation's office-bearers - Chairperson, a Co-Chairperson, not more than five Vice-Chairpersons, and a Treasurer. No office holder in government or a political party (at national or provincial level) can be an office bearer of HRCP. The Council meets at least twice every year. Besides monitoring human rights violations and seeking redress through public campaigns, lobbying and intervention in courts, HRCP organises seminars, workshops and fact-finding missions. It also issues monthly Jehd-i-Haq in Urdu and an annual report on the state of human rights in the country, both in English and Urdu. The HRCP Secretariat is headed by its Secretary General I. A. Rehman. The main office of the Secretariat is in Lahore and branch offices are in Karachi, Peshawar and Quetta. A Special Task Force is located in Hyderabad (Sindh) and another in Multan (Punjab), HRCP also runs a Centre for Democratic Development in Islamabad and is supported by correspondents and activists across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Death-Penalty-Pakistan
    Report Mission of Investigation Slow march to the gallows Death penalty in Pakistan Executive Summary. 5 Foreword: Why mobilise against the death penalty . 8 Introduction and Background . 16 I. The legal framework . 21 II. A deeply flawed and discriminatory process, from arrest to trial to execution. 44 Conclusion and recommendations . 60 Annex: List of persons met by the delegation . 62 n° 464/2 - January 2007 Slow march to the gallows. Death penalty in Pakistan Table of contents Executive Summary. 5 Foreword: Why mobilise against the death penalty . 8 1. The absence of deterrence . 8 2. Arguments founded on human dignity and liberty. 8 3. Arguments from international human rights law . 10 Introduction and Background . 16 1. Introduction . 16 2. Overview of death penalty in Pakistan: expanding its scope, reducing the safeguards. 16 3. A widespread public support of death penalty . 19 I. The legal framework . 21 1. The international legal framework. 21 2. Crimes carrying the death penalty in Pakistan . 21 3. Facts and figures on death penalty in Pakistan. 26 3.1. Figures on executions . 26 3.2. Figures on condemned prisoners . 27 3.2.1. Punjab . 27 3.2.2. NWFP. 27 3.2.3. Balochistan . 28 3.2.4. Sindh . 29 4. The Pakistani legal system and procedure. 30 4.1. The intermingling of common law and Islamic Law . 30 4.2. A defendant's itinerary through the courts . 31 4.2.1. The trial . 31 4.2.2. Appeals . 31 4.2.3. Mercy petition . 31 4.2.4. Stays of execution . 33 4.3. The case law: gradually expanding the scope of death penalty .
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS • PREFACE I-II • PROCEDURE FOR SELECTING PERSONNEL FOR PROMOTION 1-4 • PERMANENT POLICE PROMOTION EXAMINATIONS BOARD 5-6 • ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS, D.S. P., S.P.AND S.S. P. 7-9 • ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS, CPL AND SGT. 10-11 • GUIDELINES TO CANDIDATES 12-13 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF CORPORAL 14-17 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF SERGEANT 18-21 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF INSPECTOR 22-25 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE 26-29 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE 30-33 • REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SELECTION PROCEDURE FOR PROMOTION TO THE RANK OF SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE 34-36 • EXTRACT FOR FORCE ORDERS 1 PREFACE REVIEW OF POLICE PROMOTION EXAMINATIONS JAMAICA CONSTABULARY FORCE Introduction During the latter part of 1997, the Commissioner of Police, Mr. F. A. Forbes C.D. LL.B, appointed a Committee consisting of the following persons: Mr. E. K. Lobban, Assistant Commissioner of Police Mr. G. E. Kameka, Superintendent of Police Sergeant M. James, Chairman of the Police Federation (succeeded by Inspector H. Brown in December 1997 on his appointment as Chairman of the Police Federation) Mrs. E. Samuels, Director of Academic Studies at the Staff College Miss M. Phillips of the University of the West Indies (UWI) Mr. D. L. Allan, UK strategic Development Police Advisor was appointed to advise the Committee. The Committee with the power to co-opt and recognized the need for additional participation, invited the following individuals to join the Committee: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Prison Conditions
    Country Policy and Information Note Pakistan: Prison conditions Version 3.0 November 2019 Preface Purpose This note provides country of origin information (COI) and analysis of COI for use by Home Office decision makers handling particular types of protection and human rights claims (as set out in the basis of claim section). It is not intended to be an exhaustive survey of a particular subject or theme. It is split into two main sections: (1) analysis and assessment of COI and other evidence; and (2) COI. These are explained in more detail below. Assessment This section analyses the evidence relevant to this note – i.e. the COI section; refugee/human rights laws and policies; and applicable caselaw – by describing this and its inter-relationships, and provides an assessment on whether, in general: • A person is reasonably likely to face a real risk of persecution or serious harm • A person is able to obtain protection from the state (or quasi state bodies) • A person is reasonably able to relocate within a country or territory • Claims are likely to justify granting asylum, humanitarian protection or other form of leave, and • If a claim is refused, it is likely or unlikely to be certifiable as ‘clearly unfounded’ under section 94 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. Decision makers must, however, still consider all claims on an individual basis, taking into account each case’s specific facts. Country of origin information The country information in this note has been carefully selected in accordance with the general principles of COI research as set out in the Common EU [European Union] Guidelines for Processing Country of Origin Information (COI), dated April 2008, and the Austrian Centre for Country of Origin and Asylum Research and Documentation’s (ACCORD), Researching Country Origin Information – Training Manual, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Prisoners' Right to Fair Justice, Health Care and Conjugal Meetings
    Pakistan Journal of Criminology Vol. 10, Issue 4, October 2018 (42-59) Prisoners’ Right to Fair Justice, Health Care and Conjugal Meetings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice (A case study of the selected jails of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan) Rais Gul1 Abstract Imprisoned people are deprived of their liberty, yet they are human beings entitled to well-defined human rights, recognized on international level, regional levels and enshrined in the legal statutes of nation-states. This paper is aimed at exploring the massive gap between theory and practice in terms of prisoners‟ rights to fair justice, conjugal meetings and proper health care with special focus on jails in Khyber-Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Seven jails of the province were purposively selected. Of all seven jails, 250 prisoners were randomly selected and interviewed. Other key respondents who were interviewed included six jail officials and five former prisoners. The study was based on Concurrent Triangulation (Mixed Methodology) technique. It was concluded that prisoners are denied there legally guaranteed rights, i.e., conjugal meetings, swift and fair justice and proper health care. In this study, for instance, more than 85 % inmates revealed that their jail had no proper space to ensure conjugal meetings, 51.2% disclosed that they were denied fair and swift trial, while 46.8% and 92.8% unveiled that they had no access to doctors and psychiatrists respectively. Moreover, it was found that prisoners once deprived of these rights, are less likely to play a law abiding and contributory role in the after-release life. It is, therefore, recommended that Pakistan, being a signatory to all the International covenants on prisoners‟ rights and having its own Constitution and Prison Rules which safeguard prisoners, must put all the rights of the caged people into practice, so as to enable its prisons to work as correction centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrections in Pakistan (2017)
    Sindh), with features of the indigenous model, are Pakistan, Corrections in local jury systems which take the responsibility YAN ZHANG of resolving issues in an informal approach. It is the respectable men of the area that constitute the Australian National University, Australia local jury. !ey listen to both victims and o$end- ers and make a "nal decision based on their own wisdom. !e Islamic model implements Islamic !e Islamic Republic of Pakistan (Pakistan) is a sharia. !e basic goal of Islamic law is to promote sovereign country located in South Asia. Its pop- a“crimefree”environmentinsteadofcorrecting ulation of more than 197 million (in 2013) makes and rehabilitating o$enders. Physical penalties it the sixth most populous country. In 2009, including corporal punishment are applied. !is Punjabis represented 44.15% of Pakistan’s model enjoys a long tradition in Muslim countries total population, ethnically ranking in "rst and particularly in Pakistan, though it has not place, followed by Pashtuns (15.42%), Sindhis been implemented completely. !e cosmopolitan (14.1%), Seraikis (10.53%), Muhajirs (7.57%), model (Western model) of justice based on the Balochs (3.57%), and other ethnic minorities “utilitarian” concept was introduced in British (4.66%). Pakistan is a federal parliamentary South Asia in the eighteenth and nineteenth cen- republic with four provinces (Punjab, Sindh, turies. !e Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a typical Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Balochistan), two example of cosmopolitan legal culture. It was autonomous and disputed territories, one fed- dra#ed in 1837, passed by the legislative assembly eral capital territory, and a group of federally in 1860 and implemented in 1862; it is now called administered tribal areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 1 January, 1954
    36 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 1 JANUARY, 1954 Australia: Michael Okai AKYEA, Chief Inspector, Gold Coast Police Force. John Derhm McAuLEY, Superintendent 2nd Mohamed An bin Dasib, Sergeant-Major, Class, New South Wales Police Force. Federation of Malaya Police Force. Joseph Victor RAMUS, Detective Superinten- Alexander John ALLAN, Superintendent, Kenya dent 3rd Class, New South Wales Police Police Force. Force. APPU son of Vellu, Corporal, Special Con- Robert Bruce MACKIE, Inspector 1st Class. stabulary, Federation of Malaya. New South Wales Police Force. Haruna BANGURA, Sergeant-Major, Court Francis Dominick FORDE, Inspector 1st Class, Messenger Force, Sierra Leone. New South Wales Police Force. Hector Segar BASTARD, District Commandant, Cecil Ambrose ROBINSON, Inspector 1st Class, Kenya Police Reserve. New South Wales Police Force. Michael Wales BEARCROFT, Senior Reserve Michael BROOKS, Inspector 1st Class, New Officer, Kenya Police Reserve. South Wales Police Force. Ronald Stewart BENTON, Assistant Superin- Southern Rhodesia. tendent, Kenya Police Force. Frederick Vincent BOSWELL, Senior Superin- Major Graham Cecil ROGERS, British South tendent, Tanganyika Police Force. Africa Police. Patrick John Houston COOPER, Acting Senior Colonies, Protectorates and Protected States. Superintendent, Gold Coast Police Force. Edmund Keith COWEN, Senior Superintendent, Guy Charles MADOC, C.P.M., -Senior Assistant Kenya Police Force. Commissioner of Police, Federation of Terence Martin Pelham DALE, Honorary In- Malaya. spector, Auxiliary Police, Federation of Francis Knynett McNAMARA, C.P.M., Senior Malaya. Assistant Commissioner of Police, Federa- DAUD bin Ahmad, Corporal, Federation of tion of Malaya. Malaya Police Force. William Victor AUBREY, C.P.M., Superinten- Kenneth EGLEN, Acting Assistant Superinten- dent of Police, Kenya. dent, Kenya Police Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Progression Guidelines for the National Police Service Uniformed Personnel
    NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION (NPSC) “Transforming the Police Service” Career Progression Guidelines for the National Police Service Uniformed Personnel APPROVED AND ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION November, 2016 Service with Dignity REPUBLIC OF KENYA PREPARED BY THE NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE WITH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF PUBLIC SERVICE MANAGEMENT 1 1 Table of Contents Career Progression Guidelines for the National Police Service Uniformed Personnel ....................................... 1 PART ONE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 CAREER PROGRESSION GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL POLICE SERVICE UNIFORMED PERSONNEL .................................................................................................................................................. 1 SECTION I: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 1. Aims and Objectives ............................................................................................................................... 1 2. Administration and Training Scope ..................................................................................................... 1 3. The National Police Service Functions ................................................................................................ 1 4. The Ranking/Grading Structure .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 12 June, 1958 3547
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 12 JUNE, 1958 3547 SCOTLAND. Hector Harold DONOUGH, Inspector, Singapore Police Force. John Wighton GIBSON, O.B.E., Firemaster, Angus Area Fire Brigade. Robert Audley Patrick Herbert DUTTON, D.F.C., Acting Assistant Chief Constable, Cyprus Police Force. STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES. Eu Cheow Bang, Superintendent, Singapore James Slavin McGRATH, Chief Officer, New Police Force. South Wales Fire Brigades. John Njide EZEADIUGWU, Assistant Superin- tendent, Nigeria Police Force. OVERSEAS TERRITORIES. Joseph FULLER, Sergeant Major, Nigeria Police Robert LOFTHOUSE, Territorial Fire Officer, Force. Tanganyika. Kenneth Robin Thornton GOODALE, Assistant Superintendent, Kenya Police Force. John James Tawse GREIG, Inspector, Cyprus Colonial Office, 12th June, 1958. Police Force. The QUEEN has been graciously pleased, on Kemal HIFZI, Sub-Inspector, Cyprus Police the occasion of the Celebration of Her Force. Majesty's Birthday, to approve the award of the Colonial Police Medal to the under- Alexander Byron HUNTE, Station Sergeant, mentioned officers: — Leeward Islands Police Force. Jonathan INYALYO, Assistant Superintendent, SOUTHERN RHODESIA. Uganda Police Force. For Meritorious Service. John Desmond IRWIN, Assistant Super- Robert John Vivian BAILEY, Superintendent, intendent, Kenya Police Force. British South Africa Police. Oliver Pardew Sylvester JONES, M.C., Senior Captain Robert Steel e Cremer BELLAMY, Superintendent, Nigeria Police Force. British South Africa Police. Maurice William JOPLIN, Assistant Super- William Charles GREIG, Staff Chief Inspector, intendent, Kenya Police Force. British South Africa Police. Osmari Shariff KAMARA, Sub-Inspector, Sierra MAFI, Station Sergeant, British South Africa Leone Police Force. Police. John KASAGIRA, Head Constable, Uganda MPOFU, Second Class Sergeant, British South Police Force. Africa Police. Samuel KATANA, Acting Chief Inspector, Captain John Cyprian PAYNE, British South Kenya Police Force.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Behind Bars Complete & Final.Cdr
    UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Country Office Pakistan FEMALES BEHIND BARS Situation and Needs Assessment in Female Prisons and Barracks Copyright © 2011, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Country Office Pakistan This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNODC COPAK would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Disclaimer: This report has not been formally edited. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessarily represent the official policy of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Females Behind Bars Situation and Needs Assessment in Female Prisons and Barracks UNODC United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures Acknowledgments i Vision Statement iii Executive Summary v 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 02 1.1 Prisons and HIV 02 1.2 The prison system in Pakistan 03 1.3 Women prisons in Pakistan 03 1.4 Project introduction 04 2. METHODOLOGY 08 2.1 Study design and sites 08 2.2 Study subjects and sample size 08 2.3 Data collection procedures 09 2.4 Data collection instrument 10 2.5 Training on data collection 10 2.6 Data management and analysis 10 2.7 Ethical considerations 10 3. RESULTS 14 3.1 No of interviews and non response 14 3.2 Socio-demographic characteristics 14 3.2.1 Age of the respondents 14 3.2.2 Educational status 14 3.2.3 Marital
    [Show full text]