Death-Penalty-Pakistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Report Mission of Investigation Slow march to the gallows Death penalty in Pakistan Executive Summary. 5 Foreword: Why mobilise against the death penalty . 8 Introduction and Background . 16 I. The legal framework . 21 II. A deeply flawed and discriminatory process, from arrest to trial to execution. 44 Conclusion and recommendations . 60 Annex: List of persons met by the delegation . 62 n° 464/2 - January 2007 Slow march to the gallows. Death penalty in Pakistan Table of contents Executive Summary. 5 Foreword: Why mobilise against the death penalty . 8 1. The absence of deterrence . 8 2. Arguments founded on human dignity and liberty. 8 3. Arguments from international human rights law . 10 Introduction and Background . 16 1. Introduction . 16 2. Overview of death penalty in Pakistan: expanding its scope, reducing the safeguards. 16 3. A widespread public support of death penalty . 19 I. The legal framework . 21 1. The international legal framework. 21 2. Crimes carrying the death penalty in Pakistan . 21 3. Facts and figures on death penalty in Pakistan. 26 3.1. Figures on executions . 26 3.2. Figures on condemned prisoners . 27 3.2.1. Punjab . 27 3.2.2. NWFP. 27 3.2.3. Balochistan . 28 3.2.4. Sindh . 29 4. The Pakistani legal system and procedure. 30 4.1. The intermingling of common law and Islamic Law . 30 4.2. A defendant's itinerary through the courts . 31 4.2.1. The trial . 31 4.2.2. Appeals . 31 4.2.3. Mercy petition . 31 4.2.4. Stays of execution . 33 4.3. The case law: gradually expanding the scope of death penalty . 33 5. The Qisas and Diyat Ordinance and its impact on death penalty . 34 6. The case of Juveniles . 38 7. The situation in specific areas . 38 8. Special Laws - The Anti-Terrorism Act . 40 II. A deeply flawed and discriminatory process, from arrest to trial to execution. 44 1. The defects of police investigation . 44 1.1. Recent changes in the police system and investigation service . 44 1.2. The procedure in case of a criminal investigation . 45 1.2.1. The procedure in theory… . 45 1.2.2. … and its defects in practice . 46 1.3. Relying almost exclusively on witnesses . 47 1.4. Illegal detention, torture and extrajudicial executions . 47 1.5. Corruption, social and political pressure. 48 1.6. The problem of forensic investigation . 49 2. A faulty judicial process - no fair trial . ..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Locating the Survivor in the Indian Criminal Justice System: Decoding the Law I
Locating the Survivor in the Indian Criminal Justice System: Decoding the Law i Locating the Survivorin the Indian Criminal Justice System: Decoding the Law LAWYERS COLLECTIVE WOMEN’S RIGHTS INITIATIVE Contents Contents v Foreword ix Acknowledgments xi Abbreviations xiii Introduction I. Kinds of Offences and Cases 2 1. Bailable Offence 2 2. Non Bailable Offence 2 3. Cognisable Offences 2 4. Non Cognisable Offences 2 5. Cognisable Offences and Police Responsibility 3 6. Procedure for Trial of Cases 3 II. First Information Report 4 1. Process of Recording Complaint 4 2. Mandatory Reporting under Section 19 of the POCSO Act 4 3. Special Procedure for Children 5 4. Woman Officer to Record Information in Specified Offences 5 5. Special Process for Differently-abled Complainant 6 6. Non Registration of FIR 6 7. Registration of FIR and Territorial Jurisdiction 8 III. Magisterial Response 9 1. Remedy against Police Inaction 10 IV. Investigation 11 1. Steps in Investigation 12 2. Preliminary, Pre-FIR Inquiry by the Police 12 Locating the Survivor in the Indian Criminal Justice System: Decoding the Law v 3. Process of Investigation 13 4. Fair Police Investigation 14 5. Statement and Confessions 14 (i) Examination and statements of witnesses 14 (ii) Confessions to the magistrate 16 (iii) Recording the confession 16 (iv) Statements to the magistrate 16 (v) Statement of woman survivor 17 (vi) Statement of differently abled survivor 17 6. Medical Examination of the Survivor 17 (i) Examination only by consent 17 (ii) Medical examination of a child 17 (iii) Medical examination report 18 (iv) Medical treatment of a survivor 18 7.
[Show full text]
Special Mentions
SPECIAL MENTIONS The following matters of Public Importance were laid on the Table with the permission of the Chair during the Session: — Sl.No. Date Name of the Member Subject Time taken Hrs.Mts. *1. 21-08- Shri Lalit Kishore Need to release funds for 2007 Chaturvedi renovation of National Highways in Rajasthan. 2. -do- Shri Motilal Vora Concern over the shortage of seeds with Chhattisgarh Seed Development Corporation. 3. -do- Shrimati Brinda Concern over import of wheat at a Karat high price. 4. -do- Shri Abu Asim Azmi Concern over delay in Liberhan 0-01 Commission Report. 5. -do- Shri Santosh Demand to ban toxic toys. Bagrodia 6. -do- Shrimati N.P. Durga Need to appoint at least two teachers in every school in the Sl.No. Date Name of the Member Subject Time taken Hrs.Mts. country. 7. -do- Shri Dharam Pal Demand to make strict laws to curb Sabharwal smear campaign by Media. 8. 21-08- Shri Thennala G. Demand to take measures to check 2007 Balakrishna Pillai outbreak of Chikunguniya and Dengue fever in Kerala. 9. -do- Shri Pyarelal Concern over unprecedented Khandelwal increase in the prices of medicines. 10. -do- Shri Jai Parkash Need to take advance measures to Aggarwal protect telecom and other services from probable dangers of strong solar rays. 11. -do- Shri Saman Pathak Demand to improve the condition of National Highways in the North- Eastern region. 12. -do- Shri Moinul Hassan Demand to re-constitute Jute 0-01 Advisory Board and Jute Development Council. Sl.No. Date Name of the Member Subject Time taken Hrs.Mts.
[Show full text]
Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad (BDS)
Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad (BDS) S# Candidate ID Name CNIC/NICOP/Passport Father Name Aggregate Category of Candidate 1 400119 Unaiza Ijaz 154023-376796-6 Ijaz Akhtar 92.66761364 Foreign Applicant 2 400218 Amal Fatima 362016-247810-6 Mohammad Saleem 92.29545455 Foreign Applicant 3 400266 Ayesha Khadim Hussain 323038-212415-6 Khadim Hussain 92.1875 Foreign Applicant 4 400114 Umar Fakhar 611012-326296-9 Nawaid Fakhar 90.6875 Foreign Applicant 5 302200 Parisa Saif Khan 61101-6413852-0 Saif Ullah Khan 90.47727273 Local Applicant 6 400148 Ayesha Bashir 373022-885861-0 Mirza Bashir Ahmed 89.78125 Foreign Applicant 7 303109 Sidra Batool 32203-4465194-8 Aman Ullah Khan 89.65909091 Local Applicant 8 300959 Linta Masroor 61101-6613020-4 Masroor Ahmad 89.56818182 Local Applicant 9 307998 Ujala Zaib 32102-7800856-0 Khalil Ur Rehman Buzdar 89.5 Local Applicant 10 301894 Alizay Ali 37301-8963956-8 Fawad Ali 89.38636364 Local Applicant 11 306454 Bakhtawar Mohsin Jami 42501-9843019-0 Mohsin Jami 89.20454545 Local Applicant 12 400237 Saad Sajjad Mughal AS9990403 Muhammad Sajjad Mughal 89.05113636 Foreign Applicant 13 400216 Hana Bilal 121016-527023-6 Muhammad Bilal Ahmad 88.94602273 Foreign Applicant 14 305067 Laiba Khalid 42201-1432628-6 Muhammad Khalid 88.93181818 Local Applicant 15 302632 Muhammad Akhtar 36203-8203731-9 Kareem Bukhsh 88.90909091 Local Applicant 16 301728 Ali Abbas Khan 33100-8906264-1 Shah Nawaz 88.90909091 Local Applicant 17 400059 Muhammad Sohaib Khan MJ4112853 Abdul Saeed Khan 88.86647727 Foreign Applicant
[Show full text]
Supreme Court of India Bobby Art International, Etc Vs Om Pal Singh Hoon & Ors on 1 May, 1996 Author: Bharucha Bench: Cji, S.P
Supreme Court of India Bobby Art International, Etc vs Om Pal Singh Hoon & Ors on 1 May, 1996 Author: Bharucha Bench: Cji, S.P. Bharucha, B.N. Kirpal PETITIONER: BOBBY ART INTERNATIONAL, ETC. Vs. RESPONDENT: OM PAL SINGH HOON & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/05/1996 BENCH: CJI, S.P. BHARUCHA , B.N. KIRPAL ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7523, 7525-27 AND 7524 (Arising out of SLP(Civil) No. 8211/96, SLP(Civil) No. 10519-21/96 (CC No. 1828-1830/96 & SLP(C) No. 9363/96) J U D G M E N T BHARUCHA, J. Special leave granted. These appeals impugn the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in Letters Patent appeals. The Letters Patent appeals challenged the judgment and order of a learned single judge allowing a writ petition. The Letters Patent appeals were dismissed, subject to a direction to the Union of India (the second respondent). The writ petition was filed by the first respondent to quash the certificate of exhibition awarded to the film "Bandit Queen" and to restrain its exhibition in India. The film deals with the life of Phoolan Devi. It is based upon a true story. Still a child, Phoolan Devi was married off to a man old enough to be her father. She was beaten and raped by him. She was tormented by the boys of the village; and beaten by them when she foiled the advances of one of them. A village panchayat called after the incident blamed Phoolan Devi for attempting to entice the boy, who belonged to a higher caste.
[Show full text]
Conference Abstracts Part 2
ABSTRACTS 672 A Kral, R Anderson, N Flynn, R Bluthenthal than obvious. THE IMPACT OF LEGAL STATUS ON SYRINGE EXCHANGE PROGRAM Dangerous injection ways leads to spread of HIV- and other infections. OPERATIONS AND OUTCOMES: RESULTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA SYRINGE Weak use of safer sex and condoms lead to spread of infection among EXCHANGE STUDY IDUs sexual partners. Results: Results show us importance of outreach work, intervention, Background/Objectives: Since 2000, the legal status of syringe exchange counselling among IDUs, safer injection and safer sex education. Special programs (SEPs) in California has been based upon whether local County attention has to be paid to women for prevention spread of infection to officials (e.g. mayors) declare a public health emergency, thereby newborns. superceding existing syringe prescription and possession laws. Given that California has more SEPs than any other U.S. State, we set out to study the 674 N Srirak, S Kawichai, V Suriyanon, impact of legal status on SEP operations and injection drug users (IDUs) who use SEPs. J Jittiwutikarn, M Razak, K Rungruengthanakit, Methods: Three types of data were collected at 23 of 24 existing C Kitisri, R Khampan, S Yungyuankul, D Celentano California SEPs in 2001: 1) Annual program survey of SEP directors HIV INFECTION AND RISK BEHAVIORS AMONG DRUG USING COUPLES IN (N=23), 2) Annual budget provided by SEP directors, 3) A quantitative NORTHERN THAILAND survey of approximately 25 SEP clients from each SEP, including HIV Background/Objectives: HIV/AIDS research has shifted from studying Orasure testing (N=531). individual risk factors to understanding the social environment.
[Show full text]
The Civilian Impact of Drone Strikes
THE CIVILIAN IMPACT OF DRONES: UNEXAMINED COSTS, UNANSWERED QUESTIONS Acknowledgements This report is the product of a collaboration between the Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School and the Center for Civilians in Conflict. At the Columbia Human Rights Clinic, research and authorship includes: Naureen Shah, Acting Director of the Human Rights Clinic and Associate Director of the Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School, Rashmi Chopra, J.D. ‘13, Janine Morna, J.D. ‘12, Chantal Grut, L.L.M. ‘12, Emily Howie, L.L.M. ‘12, Daniel Mule, J.D. ‘13, Zoe Hutchinson, L.L.M. ‘12, Max Abbott, J.D. ‘12. Sarah Holewinski, Executive Director of Center for Civilians in Conflict, led staff from the Center in conceptualization of the report, and additional research and writing, including with Golzar Kheiltash, Erin Osterhaus and Lara Berlin. The report was designed by Marla Keenan of Center for Civilians in Conflict. Liz Lucas of Center for Civilians in Conflict led media outreach with Greta Moseson, pro- gram coordinator at the Human Rights Institute at Columbia Law School. The Columbia Human Rights Clinic and the Columbia Human Rights Institute are grateful to the Open Society Foundations and Bullitt Foundation for their financial support of the Institute’s Counterterrorism and Human Rights Project, and to Columbia Law School for its ongoing support. Copyright © 2012 Center for Civilians in Conflict (formerly CIVIC) and Human Rights Clinic at Columbia Law School All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America. Copies of this report are available for download at: www.civiliansinconflict.org Cover: Shakeel Khan lost his home and members of his family to a drone missile in 2010.
[Show full text]
Commission Internationale De Juristes Mission
Commission internationale de juristes Mission La Commission internationale de juristes est consacree a la primaute, a la coherence et a l'application du droit international et des principes qui font progresser les droits de l'Homme. La Commission internationale de juristes (CIJ) se distingue par l'impartialite, l'objectivite et l'approche juridique faisant autorite qu'elle applique a la protec tion et a la promotion des droits de l'Homme par le biais du respect de la preeminence du droit. La CIJ fournit des services d'experts juridiques aux niveaux national et interna tional afin de garantir que le developpement du droit international reste fidele aux principes des droits de l'Homme et que les normes internationales soient mises en oeuvre au plan national. La Commission, creee a Berlin en 1952, est composee de 60 juristes eminents qui representent les divers systemes juridiques du monde. II incombe au Secretariat international, base a Geneve, de realiser les buts et objectifs de la Commission. Pour s'acquitter de cette tache, le Secretariat international beneficie d'un reseau de sections nationales autonomes et d'organisations affiliees implantees sur tous les continents. Parmi les distinctions decernees a la CIJ en hommage aux contributions qu'elle a apportees a la promotion et a la protection des droits de l'Homme figurent le premier Prix europeen des droits de l'Homme attribue par le Conseil de l'Europe, le Prix Wateler pour la paix, le Prix Erasme et le Prix des Nations Unies pour les droits de l'Homme. Commission internationale de juristes Case postale 216 - 81 A, avenue de Chatelaine CH - 1219 Chatelaine / Geneve - Suisse Tel: (+41 22) 979 38 00 Fax: (+41 22) 979 38 01 E-Mail: [email protected] Site web: www.icj.org ELEMENTS FOR A GENERAL RECOMMENDATION ON RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS I ntroduction.................................................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Jirga: Justice and Conflict Transformation
REPORT Security in South Asia CAMP (Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme) and Saferworld The Jirga: justice and conflict transformation March 2012 The Jirga: justice and conflict transformation COMMUNITY APPRAISAL AND MOTIVATION PROGRAMME and SAFERWORLD MARCH 2012 Acknowledgements This report represents an analysis of primary research commissioned by Community Appraisal and Motivation Programme (CAMP) and Saferworld in Pakistan during 2011. This report was co-authored by Christian Dennys and Marjana. This publication was designed by Jane Stevenson, and prepared under the People’s Peacemaking Perspectives Project. Particular thanks for their inputs into the research process go to Aezaz Ur Rehman, Neha Gauhar, Riaz-ul-Haq, Habibullah Baig, Naveed Shinwari and Fareeha Sultan from CAMP and Rosy Cave, Chamila Hemmathagama, Paul Murphy and Evelyn Vancollie from Saferworld. CAMP and Saferworld would like to thank officials from Government of Pakistan, members of civil society and all those people living in Lower Dir and Swat who shared their views and opinions despite the sensitive nature of the topic. We are grateful to the European Union (EU) for its financial support for this project. The People’s Peacemaking Perspectives project The People’s Peacemaking Perspectives project is a joint initiative implemented by Conciliation Resources and Saferworld and financed under the European Commission’s Instrument for Stability. The project provides European Union institutions with analysis and recommendations based on the opinions and experiences of local people in a range of countries and regions affected by fragility and violent conflict. © Saferworld March 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution.
[Show full text]
Penology and Prison Administration
Penology and Prison Administration This course has been developed to enable the student to understand and critically evaluate the Pakistani penal system after developing an insight into the science of penology and the comparative penal systems. The course will introduce students to the various theories and perspectives that explain punishment and its role in societies. The main focus of the course will be on the prisons, both as a social institution and as society of captives. Students will also be introduced to models of prison management, administration and reform, and will analyze case studies from different countries that highlight specific issues. The course will survey the legal and institutional framework of prisons in Pakistan and introduce students to the scant scholarly literature that analyzes the present conditions of prisons in Pakistan. Learning Objectives Develop a basic understanding of the discipline of penology, the concept of punishment and its overall significance in the field of criminology. Provide a comparative overview of the history and development of the institution of Prison in the West. Functional aspects of the modern penitentiary with special emphasis of prison management, rehabilitation program and control technology will also be analyzed. Lastly, in the backdrop of globalization the perceivable future developmental trends in the western prison institution and their impact on globally marginalized groups and countries will be discussed. Understand the legal and structural framework of the Pakistani penal system from a comparative perspective. Understand the dynamics and determinants of the ‘Prison Society’ and its impact on the incarcerated. Apply this understanding in a critical analysis of the present conditions in the Pakistani prisons and their impact on the prisoners’ physical and mental health and re-entry into the mainstream society.
[Show full text]
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/25/2021 05:39:10PM Via Free Access
JOBNAME: Ross PAGE: 1 SESS: 2 OUTPUT: Fri May 27 10:11:14 2016 Index acquittals 81, 88, 162, 245, 376, 442 conditions 137 directed verdict 75, 109, 373, 375 final orders 136, 137 double jeopardy and appeals of 37–8, First Information Report (FIR) 135 56 historical background 123 Japan 85, 86, 404, 406, 407, 410, 414 developments since 1973 129–34 judge as investigator 89 Independence to section 438 126–9 judgment reasons 96–9 Indian PoliceAct 1861 to acquittals overturned: inadequacy Independence in 1947 123–6 of 101–4 interim orders 136–7 jury 38, 54, 56, 57, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, key features of s 438(1) 137 88, 373–4, 378, 439 knowledge of imminent arrest 135–6 Spain 86, 377, 380 lawyers’fees 137 pre-trial detention 192 text of s 438 136, 159–60 relative disappearance of 85–6 appeals 78, 79, 85, 371, 521 transcripts of trial testimony: acquittals 89, 442 overturn 91 double jeopardy and 37–8, 56 adversarial-inquisitorial dichotomy 4, Japan’s lay judge system 404 13, 16, 35, 36, 58–9, 245 jury verdicts 38, 54, 56, 57, 80, 81, appeals of acquittals 37–8 82, 373–4, 377, 378, 439 re-prosecution 39 ‘cassation’and ‘appeal’90–91, 440 endurance of 519–33 cassational courts, efficacy of 90–93 strengths 523–6 Japan 404, 410, 414 tradition 520–523 jury verdicts 38, 54, 56, 57, 58, 80, weaknesses 526–32 81, 82, 373–4, 377–8, 423–4, exclusionary rules 13, 18–19, 39–41, 438–42 44, 244 reasons on appeal 427–8 history 80–83 negotiated verdicts 47, 51 ‘innocence-weighted’approach 36–7 non-prosecution decision 225, 241–2 juries 14, 55–6 Spain 85, 92, 375–6,
[Show full text]
List of Silver Medal Winners
LIST OF SILVER MEDAL WINNERS FIRST POSITION IN DISTRICT S. NO. ROLL NO. STUDENT NAME FATHER NAME CLASS INSTITUTION CITY/DISTRICT THE KNOWLEDGE SCHOOL 1 18-52-01690-1-007-M ABDUL AHAD WAJID VIRK 1 SIALKOT NATIONAL CAMPUS INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC 2 18-53-01591-1-005-M ABDUL HADI UMER SHUJAH 1 UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD GUJRAT SCHOOLS GUJRAT CAMPUS 3 18-42-01293-1-030-M ABDUL HADI RIZWAN ZAFAR 1 LAHORE GRAMMAR SCHOOL LAHORE MUHAMMAD JAVED THE CITY SCHOOL RAHIM 4 18-068-01865-1-002-M ABDUL HADI 1 RAHIM YAR KHAN IQBAL YAR KHAN BRANCH THE CITY SCHOOL MUSLIM 5 18-42-01454-1-036-M ABDUL MOEEZ KHURRAM SHEHZAD 1 LAHORE TOWN JUNIOR CAMPUS THE CITY SCHOOL MUSLIM 6 18-42-01454-1-029-M ABDUL UR RAHEEM M. SHAFFER INAM 1 LAHORE TOWN JUNIOR CAMPUS 7 18-48-02058-1-001-M ABEEHA WASIM MUHAMMAD WASIM 1 BLUMEN GARTEN SCHOOL SARGODHA THE EDUCATORS FATEH 8 18-57-01675-1-003-M AHMED ALI ASAD ASAD ALI 1 ATTOCK JANG CAMPUS ARMY PUBLIC SCHOOL & 9 18-024-01910-1-003-M AHMED MUNIR BILAL MUNIR 1 JAMSHORO COLLEGE THE CITY SCHOOL 10 18-923-02123-1-011-M AIMAL SHERAZ SHERAZ AHMAD 1 NOWSHERA NURSERY THE KNOWLEDGE SCHOOL 11 18-52-01690-1-003-M ALI TARIQ MUHAMMAD TARIQ 1 SIALKOT NATIONAL CAMPUS KHAWAJA SHOAIB LAHORE GRAMMAR SCHOOL 12 18-42-01073-1-107-M ALISHBA SHOAIB 1 LAHORE AHMED - 1A1 JUNIOR BRANCH 13 18-48-02058-1-008-M ALIYA FATIMA MUHAMMAD SALIM 1 BLUMEN GARTEN SCHOOL SARGODHA 14 18-48-02058-1-006-M AMNA NISAR ALI 1 BLUMEN GARTEN SCHOOL SARGODHA LAHORE GRAMMAR SCHOOL 15 18-42-02205-1-002-M AREEBA ARSLAN ARSLAN ALI 1 LAHORE (LANDMARK PROJECT) THE CITY SCHOOL CANTT 16 18-91-01748-1-007-M AREESHA RASHID RASHID MINHAS 1 PESHAWAR NURSERY INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC 17 18-53-01591-1-008-M AYESHA IDREES MUHAMMAD IDREES 1 UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD GUJRAT SCHOOLS GUJRAT CAMPUS MUHAMMAD ZARTASH THE CITY SCHOOL MUSLIM 18 18-42-01454-1-039-M DUA KHALID 1 LAHORE GUL TOWN JUNIOR CAMPUS MUHAMMAD LUQMAN 19 18-48-02058-1-002-M FATIMA LUQMAN 1 BLUMEN GARTEN SCHOOL SARGODHA AKBAR 20 18-48-02058-1-005-M FATIMA-TU-ZAHRA ABDUL MAJEED 1 BLUMEN GARTEN SCHOOL SARGODHA M.
[Show full text]
Prisoners of the Pandemic the Right to Health and Covid-19 in Pakistan’S Detention Facilities
PRISONERS OF THE PANDEMIC THE RIGHT TO HEALTH AND COVID-19 IN PAKISTAN’S DETENTION FACILITIES Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. Justice Project Pakistan (JPP) is a non-profit organization based in Lahore that represents the most vulnerable Pakistani prisoners facing the harshest punishments, at home and abroad. JPP investigates, litigates, educates, and advocates on their behalf. In recognition of their work, JPP was awarded with the National Human Rights Award in December 2016 by the President of Pakistan. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: © Amnesty International and Justice Project Pakistan. Design by Ema Anis (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: ASA 33/3422/2020 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2.
[Show full text]