Helmholtz – We Do Research for People

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Helmholtz – We Do Research for People HELMHOLTZ – WE DO RESEARCH FOR PEOPLE ANNUAL REPORT 2011 THE HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATION OF GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRES TABLE OF CONTENTS HELMHOLTZ – WE DO RESEARCH FOR PEOPLE 04 PRESIDENT’S REPORT 05 PARTNER IN THE JOINT INITIATIVE FOR RESEARCH AND INNOVATION 11 Research FIELD Energy 15 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research Research FIELD Earth AND Environment 23 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research Research FIELD Health 31 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research Research FIELD AERONAUTICS, SPACE AND TRANSPORT 41 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research Research FIELD KEy TECHNOLOGIES 47 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research Research FIELD STRUCTURE OF MATTER 55 Goals and challenges, research programmes, examples of current research THE HELMHOLTZ ASSOCIATION IN FACTS AND FIGURES 63 Performance Record 64 Programme-Oriented Funding 67 Costs and Staff 2010 68 Science Awards 2010/2011 71 Central Bodies 72 Helmholtz Association Governance Structure 75 Member Centres of the Helmholtz Association 76 Locations of the Research Centres 78 PLEASE NOTE: The Helmholtz Annual Report 2011 shows the actual costs of research in 2010 and the financing of research programmes as recommended by the Helmholtz Senate for 2009 to 2013 in the research fields Earth and Environment, Health, and Aeronautics, Space and Transport. It also presents the financing recommendations for the programme period 2010 to 2014 for the research fields Energy, Key Technologies and Structure of Matter. The general section of the report presents developments at the Helmholtz Association from 2010 to August 2011. We contribute to solving the major and pressing problems facing society, science and industry today by conducting high-level research in the strategic programmes within our six research fields: Energy, Earth and Environment, Health, Key Technologies, the Structure of Matter, and Aeronautics, Space and Transport. We research highly complex systems using our large-scale facilities and scientific infrastructure in cooperation with national and international partners. We are committed to shaping our shared future by combining research and technological developments with innovative app lications and prevention strategies. This is our mission. 03 WE DO RESEARCH FOR PEOPLE Professor Jürgen Mlynek Dear Readers, The Helmholtz Association focuses its research strategy This annual report is designed to inform you about de- on the most pressing problems and challenges of the day. velopments, projects and achievements at the Helmholtz We do research for people. This motto applies not only to Association. We have made a conscious decision to keep our research in the area of health, where we investigate it short in order to provide you with a quick overview. You the causes and mechanisms of major common diseases, can read our annual report as an online magazine and on but also to our other five research fields, which range all modern mobile devices. from energy to fundamental questions about the struc- ture of matter. Research deepens our understanding of I wish you a stimulating read, nature and enables us to conserve and wisely use re- sources such as water, the atmosphere, soil, energy and raw materials as a means of ensuring prosperity and qual- ity of life over the long term. With its strategically based, solutions-oriented research, the Helmholtz Association is making an important contribution to achieving these goals. Jürgen Mlynek, President 04 Helmholtz researchers are seeking to identify new active pharmaceutical ingredients and improve them for future patients. Thanks to this research, patients are benefiting more quickly from new findings. Photo: HZI/U. Bellhäuser PRESIDENT’S REPORT Over the past year, the Helmholtz Association has grown the expertise of German researchers with regard to major dynamically, strengthened its profile and continued to common diseases. Our research agenda is focusing on increase its visibility. These developments reflect the these and other issues that will become increasingly vital Helmholtz Association’s importance and mission as an as we move into the future. We are also working to ensure umbrella organisation of national research centres in the strategic relevance and scientific excellence of Helm- Germany. Helmholtz research deals with pressing prob- holtz research through the competitive process of pro- lems and complex challenges and seeks to develop ef- gramme-oriented funding. Our entire core budget of more fective solutions. A prime than two billion euros will example of such a challenge be awarded on the basis of is the pending transform- We are working to ensure the strategic this process, with the rele- ation of the energy economy, relevance and scientific excellence of vant research programmes for which Helmholtz energy Helmholtz research through the competitive coming under review at five- research will provide an im- process of programme-oriented funding. year intervals. Together with portant underpinning. We are our funding bodies, we have also facing major challenges examined and enhanced in the field of health research. In ageing societies such as this process over the last year (“Programme-Oriented ours, the percentage of the population in need of medical Funding III”). We have retained the basic features of a assistance will continue to grow and, as a result, we need method that has proved highly successful as a whole, but to conduct goal-oriented research in order to develop ef- adapted individual stages to the new conditions emerging fective preventative measures, new diagnostic procedures in the world of scientific research. and options for treatment. To this end, the Helmholtz cen- In order to enhance the actual impact of Helmholtz re- tres have been involved in setting up “German Centres search, we have developed visions for the future in all six of Health Research”, whose goal is to pool and increase fields of research as part of a comprehensive portfolio 05 The first PET/MRT scanner to be approved for patients in Germany is based on an innovative technology that integrates two imaging procedures. It enables doctors to perform combined scans of the entire body for medical research. Photo: Helmholtz/ HZDR/F. Bierstedt development process that has involved experts from all the Helmholtz centres. We have also identified a range of DEVELOPMENT OF THE research topics that are closely aligned with our mission and will now be given higher levels of funding. HELMHOLTZ PORTFOLIO At the same time, the infrastructure required for future re- During the year under review, the Helmholtz As- search fields must be planned and built in a timely fashion sociation pressed ahead with the portfolio devel- so that we can conduct research in Germany that is up to opment and foresight processes initiated in indi- international standards. Helmholtz researchers have made vidual fields of research in 2009. Drawing on all strategic preparations for this planning process, drawing the key groups, the association sought to identify up a roadmap that identifies the most important research gaps in research and important future topics in infrastructure. The results are currently being discussed order to strengthen its profile and focus research with funding bodies in the federal government and the fed- even more systematically on pressing issues in eral states. science, industry and society. The results of these Furthermore, after a thorough review, we have expanded processes will provide a foundation for defining and optimised the Initiative and Networking Fund together the orientation of the Helmholtz Association’s with other internal instruments. In the process, the Helm- research agenda in the upcoming third period of holtz Association has made an important contribution to programme-oriented funding. In the initial phase, modernising the German research landscape. a variety of research topics were selected: energy storage/battery research, water research, climate The Helmholtz Association is growing* research, the bioeconomy, active product ingredients Thanks to the higher level of funding and the association’s research and gas separation membranes. new members, we are now in a better position than ever The additional funds made available to the Helmholtz to provide excellent conditions for research and to fulfil Association from the Joint Initiative for Research and our mission. Total funding for fiscal year 2011 – amounting Innovation II have played a special role in the portfolio to 2,203 million euros – grew by 8 percent over fiscal year development and foresight processes. The planned 2010. There are two reasons for this growth: the 5 percent 5 percent increase in the total budget each year will be increase in funding from the Joint Initiative for Research used, among other things, to implement the resulting and Innovation (Pakt für Forschung und Innovation), and the decisions. The Helmholtz Association is aware of its increase in financing levels for special investments (Sonder- special responsibility to use these funds efficiently to tatbestände). An additional factor was the Helmholtz-Zentrum achieve the initiative’s aims. Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), which was transferred to the Helmholtz Association from the Leibniz Association in early g www.helmholtz.de/en/portfolio 2011. The HZDR has a staff of around 800 and a total budget of more than 118 million euros. *See also the chapter “The Helmholtz
Recommended publications
  • 2019 EPS PPD Report
    Report from the EPS Plasma Physics Division Board, Summer 2019 Board meetings The Board met twice in 2018, on 1st July in Prague (CZ) and on 13th December at Culham (UK). Operation of the Division Richard Dendy (Culham Centre for Fusion Energy and Warwick University, UK) continues as Chair 2016-2020 of the Division, and Kristel Crombé (ERM/KMS and Ghent University, Belgium) continues as Secretary. The Board members leading the arrangements for the competitions for the 2018 EPS-PPD Prizes were: Alfvén, John Kirk (Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Germany); Innovation, Holger Kersten (Kiel University, Germany) and Eva Kovačević (Orléans University, France); PhD Research Award, Carlos Silva (Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal). Further information is available at http://plasma.ciemat.es/eps/board/. Prague EPS Plasma Physics Conference 2018 (https://eps2018.eli-beams.eu/en/) The successful 45th annual EPS Plasma Physics Conference took place at the Žofín Palace in Prague from 2nd to 6th July 2018, hosted by a consortium of Czech plasma research organisations. The Local Organising Committee was ably chaired by Stefan Weber (ELI-Beamlines), who is also an EPS-PPD Board member. The Programme Committee was ably chaired by Stefano Coda (CH) and comprised: •MCF: M. Mantsinen (ES – sub-chair), T. Eich (DE), G. Ericsson (SE), L. Frassinetti (SE), G. Huijsmans (ITER), R. König (DE), J. Mailloux (UK), P. Piovesan (IT), R. Zagorski (PL) •BPIF: C. Michaut (FR – sub-chair), O. Klimo (CZ), M. Nakatsutsumi (XFEL), A. Ravasio (FR), S. Kar (UK), R. Scott (UK) •BSAP: G. Lapenta (BE – sub-chair), M.E. Dieckmann (SE), E.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion Energy Source of the Future
    Fusion Energy Source of the Future EUROfusion Research Progamme in Austria 2014 - 2020 Impressum Editors Monika Fischer [email protected] Lätitia Unger [email protected] Friedrich Aumayr [email protected] Contributions from Friedrich Aumayr, Markus Biberacher, Lukas Einkemmer, Michael Eisterer, Codrina Ionita-Schrittwieser, Alexander Kendl, Winfried Kernbichler, Helmut Leeb, Reinhard Pippan, Michael Probst, Paul Scheier, Klaus Schöpf, Roman Schrittwieser, David Tskhakaya Acknowledgements Austrian Academy of Sciences: Bernhard Plunger, Anton Zeilinger and Presiding Committee Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research: Stefan Hanslik, Daniel Weselka Kommission für die Koordination der Kernfusionsforschung in Österreich (KKKÖ): Peter Steinhauser (chair), Friedrich Aumayr, Michael Eisterer, Alexander Kendl, Helmut Leeb, Winfried Kernbichler, Harald Weber, Daniel Weselka Financial Support Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences EUROfusion Co-Fund Action (H2020 Grant No. 633053) Disclaimer EUROfusion receives funding from Euratom’s research and training programme 2014-2018 and 2019-2020 under Grant Agreement No. 633053 and finances fusion research activities in accordance with the Roadmap to the realisation of fusion energy. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. Cover image: ITER Tokamak and Plant Systems (Credit: www.ITER.org) Fusion Energy Source of the Future EUROfusion Research Programme in Austria, 2014-2020 Editors: Monika Fischer, Lätitia Unger Friedrich Aumayr Supported by: Copyright © 2020 by Austrian Academy of Sciences Vienna Printed in Austria Table of Contents Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 4 1. Management Structure and Core Competencies 7 1.1. EUROfusion Consortium 7 1.2. Austrian Beneficiary ÖAW and its Linked Third Parties 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vierzig Jahre Fachverband Atomphysik
    DEUTSCHE PHYSIKALISCHE GESELLSCHAFT E.V. Vierzig Jahre Fachverband Atomphysik 1972 - 2012 Herausgegeben von Uwe Becker, Rainer Hentges, Bernd Lohmann, Burkhard Langer Please help us to improve this document by mailing your corrections to Rainer Hentges, Schönhauser Allee 68, 10437 Berlin, [email protected]. In particular it would be nice to get all the names correctly spelled. t Inhalt v06 [ i \ 23. Mai 2013 t Register Vorwort Vor 40 Jahren fanden die ersten Sitzungen des neugegründeten Fachverbands Atomphysik auf der Frühjahrstagung der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft in Hannover statt. In den davorliegenden Tagungen wurden die Bereiche Atom-, Kern- und Teilchenphysik noch in ge- meinsamen Sitzungen behandelt. Die Gründungsperiode des Fachverbands Atomphysik fand in einer Zeit statt, in der sich das spezifische Fachgebiet in keiner besonders guten Position im Hinblick auf seinen Bei- trag zum Fortschritt der Physik im Allgemeinen befand. Dieser Fortschritt wurde in zuneh- mendem Maße in Fachkreisen mit den faszinierenden Entdeckungen in der Hochenergie- Physik gleichgesetzt. Dass Atomphysik in der breiteren Öffentlichkeit immer noch als Syn- onym für Atom-, Kern- und Elementarteilchenphysik stand, der Titel eines Buches meines Doktorvaters Hans Bucka, ein Schüler von Hans Kopfermann, war in Fachkreisen längst ver- gessen und das Gesamtgebiet in seine jeweiligen Unterdisziplinen aufgeteilt. Hier stand die Hochenergie-Physik, welche die klassische Kernphysik bereits in atemberaubendem Tempo überholt hatte, eineindeutig als Speerspitze der Physik im Vordergrund des Interesses. Es war eine Zeit, in der ich mich manchmal entschuldigen musste, meine Doktorarbeit noch auf ei- nem Gebiet durchzuführen, von dem viele meinten, dies sei doch die „Physik der Frühphase der Quantenphysik“ also die Physik der zwanziger Jahre.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Particle transport as a result of resonant magnetic perturbations Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vp0v01z Author Mordijck, Saskia Publication Date 2011 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Particle transport as a result of Resonant Magnetic Perturbations A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering Sciences (Engineering Physics) by Saskia Mordijck Committee in charge: Richard A. Moyer, Chair Farhat Beg Patrick H. Diamond Farrokh Najmabadi George Tynan 2011 Copyright Saskia Mordijck, 2011 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Saskia Mordijck is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on mi- crofilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2011 iii DEDICATION To Pieter iv EPIGRAPH A person who never made a mistake never tried anything new. —Alber Einstein v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page .................................. iii Dedication ..................................... iv Epigraph ..................................... v Table of Contents ................................. vi List of Figures .................................. viii List of Tables ................................... x Acknowledgements ................................ xi Vita and Publications .............................. xiii Abstract of the Dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    26th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference - IAEA CN-234 Monday 17 October 2016 - Saturday 22 October 2016 Kyoto International Conference Center Збірник тез Contents Role of MHD dynamo in the formation of 3D equilibria in fusion plasmas . 1 Penetration and amplification of resonant perturbations in 3D ideal-MHD equilibria . 2 Enhancement of helium exhaust by resonant magnetic perturbation fields . 2 Enhanced understanding of non‐axisymmetric intrinsic and controlled field impacts in tokamaks .......................................... 3 Optimization of the Plasma Response for the Control of Edge-Localized Modes with 3D Fields ............................................. 4 Two Conceptual Designs of Helical Fusion Reactor FFHR-d1A Based on ITER Technolo- gies and Challenging Ideas & Development of Remountable Joints and Heat Removable Techniques for High-temperature Superconducting Magnets & Lessons Learned from the Eighteen-Year Operation of the LHD Poloidal Coils Made from CIC Conductors . 5 Dealing with uncertainties in fusion power plant conceptual development . 7 Accomplishment of DEMO R&D Activity of IFERC Project in BA activity and strategy to- ward DEMO & Progress of conceptual design study on Japanese DEMO . 8 High Temperature Superconductors for Fusion at the Swiss Plasma Center . 8 Development of a Systematic, Self-consistent Algorithm for K-DEMO Steady-state Opera- tion Scenario ........................................ 9 Effect of the second X-point on the hot VDE for HL-2M ................... 10 Assessment of the runaway electron energy dissipation in ITER . 11 Shattered Pellet Injection as the Primary Disruption Mitigation Technique forITER . 12 Runaway electron generation and mitigation on the European medium sized tokamaks ASDEX Upgrade and TCV ................................. 13 Disruption study advances in the JET metallic wall ..................... 14 Mitigation of Runaway Current with Supersonic Molecular Beam Injection on HL-2A Toka- mak .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern Recognition in Spaces of Probability Distributions for the Analysis of Edge-Localized Modes in Tokamak Plasmas
    Pattern recognition in spaces of probability distributions for the analysis of edge-localized modes in tokamak plasmas Aqsa Shabbir M¨unchen 2016 Pattern recognition in spaces of probability distributions for the analysis of edge-localized modes in tokamak plasmas Aqsa Shabbir Doctoral thesis submitted in order to obtain the academic degrees of Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨atM¨unchen Doctor of Engineering Physics Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Ghent University vorgelegt von Aqsa Shabbir aus Lahore, Pakistan M¨unchen, den 11. May 2016 . Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Hartmut Zohm Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:07.07.2016 This research work has been performed at: Ghent University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Department of Applied Physics Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Boltzmannstraße 2 D-85748 Garching, Germany Joint European Torus Culham Centre for Fusion Energy (CCFE) Abingdon OX14 3DB, United Kingdom i ii Members of the examination committee Prof. Dr. Rik Van de Walle Chairman: Ghent University Prof. Dr. Jean-Marie Noterdaeme Secretary: Ghent University and Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Prof. Dr. Geert Verdoolaege Ghent University and Promoters: Royal Military Academy, Brussels Prof. Dr. Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Prof. Dr. Ralf Bender Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Otmar Biebel Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Gert de Cooman Other members: Ghent University Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Gregor Morfill Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich and terraplasma GmbH Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern Recognition in Spaces of Probability Distributions for the Analysis of Edge-Localized Modes in Tokamak Plasmas
    Pattern recognition in spaces of probability distributions for the analysis of edge-localized modes in tokamak plasmas Aqsa Shabbir M¨unchen 2016 Pattern recognition in spaces of probability distributions for the analysis of edge-localized modes in tokamak plasmas Aqsa Shabbir Doctoral thesis submitted in order to obtain the academic degrees of Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Fakult¨atf¨urPhysik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨atM¨unchen Doctor of Engineering Physics Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Ghent University vorgelegt von Aqsa Shabbir M¨unchen, den 11. May 2016 . Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Hartmut Zohm Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch Tag der m¨undlichen Pr¨ufung:07.07.2016 This research work has been performed at: Ghent University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture Department of Applied Physics Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41 B-9000 Ghent, Belgium Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Boltzmannstraße 2 D-85748 Garching, Germany Joint European Torus Culham Centre for Fusion Energy (CCFE) Abingdon OX14 3DB, United Kingdom i ii Members of the examination committee Prof. Dr. Rik Van de Walle Chairman: Ghent University Prof. Dr. Jean-Marie Noterdaeme Secretary: Ghent University and Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Prof. Dr. Geert Verdoolaege Ghent University and Promoters: Royal Military Academy, Brussels Prof. Dr. Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPlasmaphysik Prof. Dr. Ralf Bender Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Otmar Biebel Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Gert de Cooman Other members: Ghent University Prof. Dr. Harald Lesch Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich Prof. Dr. Gregor Morfill Ludwig-Maximilians University of Munich and terraplasma GmbH Dr. Andrea Murari Culham Science Centre and Consorzio RFX (CNR, ENEA, INFN, Acciaierie Venete S.P.A., Universit`adi Padova) iii iv Doctoral guidance committee Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht 2017 Der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren INHALT
    GESCHÄFTSBERICHT 2017 DER HELMHOLTZ-GEMEINSCHAFT DEUTSCHER FORSCHUNGSZENTREN INHALT VORWORT 04 Helmholtz – Von Daten zu Wissen BERICHT DES PRÄSIDENTEN 05 HELMHOLTZ-INKUBATOR INFORMATION & DATA SCIENCE 09 ULTRADÜNNE CIGSE-SOLARZELLEN REKRUTIERUNGSINITIATIVE 10 16 Ultradünne CIGSe-Solarzellen sparen Material und Energie bei der Herstellung. Allerdings ist ihr Wirkungsgrad CHANCENGLEICHHEIT 12 geringer als der von Standard-CIGSe-Zellen, da sie weniger Licht absorbieren. Eine Nanostruktur aus Siliziumoxidteilchen auf der Rückseite kann jedoch Licht „einfangen“ und wieder in die Zelle INNOVATION UND TRANSFER – TEIL DER MISSION zurückleiten. DER HELMHOLTZ-GEMEINSCHAFT 13 AKTUELLE PROJEKTE AUS DER HELMHOLTZ-FORSCHUNG 14 Forschungsbereich Energie 14 Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt 18 Forschungsbereich Gesundheit 22 Forschungsbereich Luftfahrt, Raumfahrt und Verkehr 26 Forschungsbereich Materie 30 Forschungsbereich Schlüsseltechnologien (künftig: Forschungsbereich Information) 34 LEISTUNGSBILANZ 38 Ressourcen 38 Wissenschaftliche Leistung 40 Kosten und Personal 42 WELTWEIT GRÖSSTE STUDIE 25 ZUR EPIGENETIK BEI ÜBERGEWICHT Die Studie zeigt, dass ein erhöhter Body Mass Index, kurz WISSENSCHAFTLICHE PREISE UND AUSZEICHNUNGEN 45 BMI, zu epigenetischen Veränderungen an fast 200 Stellen des Erbguts führt. Vor allem Gene, die für den Fettstoffwech- ORGANE UND ZENTRALE GREMIEN 46 sel sowie für Stofftransport zuständig sind, waren betroffen, aber auch Entzündungsgene. GOVERNANCESTRUKTUR DER HELMHOLTZ-GEMEINSCHAFT 48 STANDORTE DER FORSCHUNGSZENTREN 49 MITGLIEDSZENTREN
    [Show full text]
  • Past Colloquium Speakers
    Past Colloquium Speakers 2007/2008 Alain Herve “Experience Gained from the Construction, Test, and Operation of the Large 4-Tesla Superconducting Coil for the CMS Experiment at CERN” Former Technical Coordinator of the CMS Experiment, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Erik Winfree “Programming the DNA World” Associate Professor, California Institute of Technology, Computer Science & Computation and Neural science, Pasadena, CA John Sheffield “What About Fusion Reactors?” Senior Fellow, University of Tennessee, Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment, Knoxville, TN Ian Dobson “Cascading Failure, the Risk of Large Blackouts, Criticality, and Self-Organization” Professor, University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Madison, WI Edward W. Felten “Electronic Voting: Danger and Opportunity” Professor, Princeton University, Computer Science and Public Affairs Sergey Macheret “Weakly Ionized Plasmas for Aerospace Applications” Senior Staff Aeronautical Engineer, Revolutionary Technology Programs, Lockheed Martin, Palmdale, CA Stewart Prager “The Reversed Field Pinch: Progress from Fusion to Astrophysics” Professor, University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Physics, Madison, WI Peter Barker “Controlling the Motion of Atoms and Molecules with Intense Optical Fields” Professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College – London, U.K. Michael A. Liebreman “Nanoelectronics and Plasma Processing—the Next Fifteen Years and Beyond” Professor, University of California Berkeley, Department of Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Invited Abstracts
    24th Symposium on Fusion Technology 11 - 15 September 2006 - Palace of Culture and Science, Warsaw, Poland BOOK OF INVITED ABSTRACTS How to read Paper Identification Code (SN-T-I): S = Session (PL=Plenary, P=Poster, O=Oral) N = Session number (parallel sessions numbered 1A, 1B etc.) T = TOPIC (i.e. "I" = Materials Technology) I = ID number Table of Contents (PL1-O-574) Norbert Holtkamp; An Overview of the ITER Project 1 (PL1-O-551) Jerome Pamela et al.; THE CONTRIBUTION OF JET TO ITER 2 (PL1-O-550) Shinzaburo Matsuda; The EU/JA Broader Approach Activities 3 (PL2-O-561) Felix Schauer; Status of Wendelstein 7-X Construction 4 (PL2-O-554) Mark Henderson; EU Developments of the ITER ECRH System 5 (PL2-O-146) Songtao Wu; An Overview of the EAST Project 6 (PL3-O-564) Vanni Antoni; The ITER Neutral Beam system: status of the project and review of the main technological issues 7 (PL3-O-560) Manfred Glugla et al.; THE ITER TRITIUM SYSTEMS 8 (PL3-O-552) Daniel Ciazynski; Review of Nb3Sn conductors for ITER 9 (PL4-O-571) Maurizio Gasparotto; European technology activities to prepare for ITER component procurement 10 (PL4-O-303) Jean-Philippe GIRARD et al.; ITER Safety and Licensing 11 (PL5-O-553) Rainer Laesser et al.; Development, simulation and testing of structural materials for DEMO 12 (PL5-O-545) Michael Kaufmann; Tungsten as First Wall Material in Fusion Devices 13 (PL5-O-549) David Ward; The Contribution of Fusion to Sustainable Development 14 (PL5-O-563) Karl Lackner; Technology and Plasma Physics Developments needed for DEMO 15 24th Symposium
    [Show full text]
  • Report from the EPS Plasma Physics Divisional Board
    Report from the EPS Plasma Physics Divisional Board Board meetings The Board met twice in 2015, the 22nd of June in Lisbon (Portugal) and the 4th of December in Paris (France). Development of the Division In accordance with the statutes of the Division, Sylvie Jacquemot will be succeeded the 8th of July by Richard Dendy who was elected during the winter Board meeting. The mandate of 4 Board members will also end this summer: Dirk van Eester, Javier Honrubia, Thomas Klinger and Bertrand Lembège. The Division is grateful for their many contributions. An election process was initiated in February and completed the 3rd of June. Kristel Crombé (ERM/KMS, Belgium), Andreas Dinklage (IPP Garching, Germany), Basil Duval (EPFL, Switzerland), Carlos Silva (IPFN/IST, Portugal) and Vladimir Tikhonchuk (CELIA, France) were thus chosen by the EPS Plasma Physics community. For more information, connect to http://plasma.ciemat.es/eps/board/. Lisbon EPS PP Conference 2015 (http://www.ipfn.ist.utl.pt/EPS2015/) The 42nd EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, hosted by the Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, was held at the Centro Cultural de Belém (Portugal) from the 22nd to the 26th of June, 2015. The Local Organizing Committee ‐ Bruno Gonçalves (chair), Carlos Silva (co‐chair) and Rui Coelho (scientific secretary) and their staff ‐ did an excellent job to ensure a smoothly run conference which finally attracted 647 delegates coming from 38 countries, amongst them 158 students. The scientific programme benefitted from the enthusiasm and the dedication of the Programme Committee, especially of its chair ‐ Robert Bingham – and sub‐chairs: Wolfgang Suttrop (Magnetic Confinement Fusion: MCF), Stefano Atzeni (Beam Plasma & Inertial Fusion: BPIF), Ken McClements (Basic, Space & Astrophysical Plasmas: BSAP) and Rüdiger Foest (Low Temperature & Dusty Plasmas: LTDP), and from the effective work done behind the scene by Boudewijn van Milligen as responsible for the online computer system.
    [Show full text]
  • The ITER Power Amplification Myth by Steven B
    The ITER Power Amplification Myth By Steven B. Krivit Oct. 6, 2017 ITER under construction (Photo: ITER organization) Short link to online version: http://tinyurl.com/y9lvf79j This is the third of three reports about the claims by representatives and proponents of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). "The Selling of ITER" published on Jan. 12, 2017. "Former ITER Spokesman Confirms Accuracy of New Energy Times Story" published on Jan. 19, 2017. Abstract (Copyleft, Duplication with Attribution Permitted) The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is the largest and most expensive science experiment on Earth today. Public outreach for the experimental fusion reactor, under the direction of Laban Coblentz, the head of the ITER communications office, has led journalists and the public to believe that, when completed, the reactor will produce 10 times more power than goes into it. It will do no such thing. The $22 billion reactor is designed to produce only 1.6 times more thermal power than it consumes in electric power. Using a more conservative 1 calculation, the reactor will lose more power than it produces. The planned output power of the reactor has been reported correctly, but the input power for the reactor has been widely reported, incorrectly, as 50 megawatts. The actual input power value, rarely discussed publicly, will be significantly larger. For decades, some proponents of thermonuclear fusion research have used a double meaning for the phrase "fusion power" yet failed to inform the public, the news media, or legislators about the existence of this dual meaning. This ambiguity has caused non‐ experts to think that power production rates from large‐scale thermonuclear fusion experiments show greater technological progress than has actually occurred.
    [Show full text]