DOCSLIB.ORG

PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN I PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN i DAFTAR ISI KATA PENGANTAR............................................................................................. iii DAFTAR ISI ................................................................................ v I. KEADAAN UMUM .............................................................. 1 1.1. Geografis Daerah ........................................................... 1 1.2. Penduduk Berdasarkan Kelamin ....................................... 2 1.3. Penduduk Berdasarkan Usia ............................................ 2 1.4. Upah Minimum Provinsi Kalimantan Timur (UMR) .............. 3 1.5. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Zonasi Perikanan. ................ 4 II. KONDISI PERIKANAN ......................................................... 5 2.1. Kelautan ....................................................................... 5 2.2. Perikanan Tangkap ......................................................... 6 2.3. Perikanan Budidaya ........................................................ 10 2.4. Pengolahan dan Pemasaran ............................................. 16 III. SARANA DAN PRASARANA .................................................. 51 3.1. Infrastruktur yang tersedia .............................................. 51 3.2. Aksesibilitas (Transportasi dan Logistik) ............................ 53 3.3. Sarana Dasar (Listrik, Air Bersih, Telekomunikasi) ............. 55 3.4. Sarana Perikanan (Pelabuhan Perikanan, TPI, Pabrik Es, Cold Storage, Pasar Ikan). ................................ 58 3.5. Perangkat Pendukung Daerah .......................................... 62 IV. POTENSI USAHA DAN INVESTASI ....................................... 63 4.1. Kelautan ....................................................................... 63 4.2. Perikanan Tangkap ......................................................... 66 4.3. Perikanan Budidaya ........................................................ 66 V. PELUANG INVESTASI YANG DITAWARKAN ......................... 73 VI. KEMUDAHAN INVESTASI .................................................... 85 6.1. Layanan Perijinan Daerah ................................................ 85 PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN v 6.2. Kebijakan dan Regulasi Daerah ........................................ 88 6.3 Insentif Daerah .............................................................. 90 6.4. Penyelesaian Hambatan Investasi .................................... 92 VII. KONTAK PENGHUBUNG ....................................................... 93 Lampiran FOTO DOKUMENTASI vi PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN l. KEADAAN UMUM 1.1. Geografis Daerah Daerah Kalimantan Timur memiliki luas wilayah 127.267,52 km2 dan luas pengelolaan laut 25.267,52 km2, terletak antara 113 ’44 - 119 00’ Bujur Timur, dan antara 2 33’ Lintang Utara dan 2 25’ Lintang Selatan. Dengan adanya perkembangan dan pemekaran wilayah, Kalimantan Timur yang merupakan provinsi terluas ketiga setelah Papua dan Kalimantan Tengah, di bagi menjadi 7 (tujuh) Kabupaten dan 3 (tiga) Kota 103 kecamatan dan 1.032 desa / kelurahan. Tujuh kabupaten tersebut adalah Paser dengan ibukota Tanah Grogot, Kutai Barat dengan ibukota Sendawar, Kutai Kartanegara PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN 1 dengan ibukota Tenggarong, Kutai Timur dengan ibukota Sangatta, Berau dengan ibukota Tanjung Redeb, Panajam Paser Utara dengan ibukota Panajam, dan Mahakam Ulu dengan ibukota Ujoh Bilang, sedangkan tiga kota adalah Balikpapan, Bontang dan Samarinda. Kalimantan Timur merupakan salah satu pintu gerbang utama di wilayah Indonesia Timur, daerah yang juga dikenal sebagai gudang kayu dan hasil pertambangan ini mempunyai ratusan sungai yang tersebar pada hampir semua kabupaten / kota yang merupakan sarana angkutan utama disamping angkutan darat, dengan sungai yang terpanjang Sungai Mahakam. Provinsi Kalimantan Timur terletak paling Timur Pulau Kalimantan, tepatnya provinsi ini berbatasan langsung dengan Kalimantan Utara di sebelah Utara, Laut Sulawesi dan Selat Makasar di sebelah Timur, Kalimantan selatan di sebelah Selatan, dan Kalimantan Barat, Kalimantan Tengah serta Malaysia di sebelah Barat. 1.2. Penduduk Berdasarkan Kelamin Satuan : orang Tahun Laki - laki Perempuan Total 2012 1.678.863 1.520.833 3.199.696 2013 1.718.918 1.556.926 3.275.844 2014 1.758.073 1.593.359 3.351.432 2015 1.797.297 1.629.341 3.426.638 2016 1.836.293 1.664.939 3.501.332 2017 1.878.805 1.700.664 3.575.449 Sumber : Bappeda Provinsi Kalimantan Timur 1.3. Penduduk Berdasarkan Usia (Laki -Laki dan Perempuan) Satuan : orang TAHUN UMUR 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 0-4 325.454 330.609 335.571 340.224 345.231 348.331 5-9 304.730 307.169 309.835 296.959 300.447 317.992 10-14 284.565 288.438 292.562 296.959 300.447 302.972 15-19 282.679 283.517 284.732 286.105 288.697 292.485 20-24 295.440 297.707 297.121 303.513 309.123 300.584 25-29 298.330 303.271 307.324 309.889 312.516 314.408 30-34 284.475 290.707 297.121 303.513 309.123 313.861 2 PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN 35-39 254.973 262.997 270.498 292.391 285.960 293.475 40-44 216.372 225.931 235.433 243.972 252.098 260.160 45-49 170.567 179.707 189.258 199.061 208.922 218.530 50-54 124.242 132.808 141.148 149.558 158.203 167.412 55-59 83.677 90.418 97.573 104.995 112.500 119.956 60-64 45.684 55.601 60.480 66.845 71.615 77.749 65-69 30.908 33.352 22.461 38.860 42.303 46.265 70-74 11.161 21.870 21.586 23.696 25.044 26.554 75- 19.196 20.344 21.586 22.925 22.925 25.906 Sumber : Bappeda Provinsi Kaltim 1.4. Upah Minimum Provinsi Kalimantan Timur (UMR) Penetapan Upah Minimum (UMP) Provinsi Kalimantan Timur untuk tahun 2018 dengan formula inflasi nasional sebesar 3,72 persen dan pertumbuhan ekonomi (PDB) sebesar 4,99 persen sehingga total 8,71 persen, sehingga dengan kalkulasi tersebut maka UMP Kalimantan Timur ditetapkan Rp.2.543.331,71. Bila dibandingkan UMP Kalimantan Timur tahun 2017 sebesar Rp.2.339.556,37, maka terjadi kenaikan Rp.203.775,35 atau 8,71 persen. Daftar Upah Minimum Kabupaten/Kota (UMK) Tahun 2015 – 2018 UMK (Rp.) No. Kabupaten/Kota 2015 2016 2017 2018 1. Kutai Kartanegara 2.110.0 2.161.1 2.339.5 2.712.4 00 53 56 91 2. Kutai Timur 2.100.0 2.305.0 2.495.1 2.678.7 00 00 63 31 3. Paser 2.011.0 2.193.0 2.373.9 2.580.6 00 00 23 91 4. Penajam Paser 2.100.0 2.440.0 2.566.3 2.789.9 Utara 00 00 92 24 5. Samarinda 1.995.0 2.256.0 2.442.1 2.654.8 00 56 81 94 6. Bontang 1.980.0 2.307.1 2.497.5 2.715.0 00 98 42 78 7. Balikpapan 1.900.0 2.225.0 2.408.5 2.618.3 Sumber : Surat Keputusan00 Gubernur 00Kalimantan Timur63 No. 48 8. 561/K/5731/2016Berau 2.100.0 2.455.0 2.657.5 2.889.0 00 00 38 09 9. Kutai Barat 1.920.0 2.161.1 2.161.1 2.543.3 00 53 53 31 PROFIL10. Mahakam PELUANG Ulu USAHA DAN INVESTASI- KELAUTAN2.161.1 DAN 2.161.1PERIKANAN 2.543.3 3 53 53 31 1.5. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Zonasi Perikanan. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Zonasi Perikanan Provinsi Kalimantan Timur masih tahapan berjalan dengan progress Pasal 23 Pembentukan Tim Pokja dan Pasal 24 yaitu melakukan pengambilan Data Lapangan (Survey). Sedangkan tindak lanjut yang dilakukan sampai saat ini adalah melakukan Analisis Data Pemetaan dan Tematik. 4 PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN II. KONDISI PERIKANAN 2.1. Kelautan Sektor Kelautan dan Perikanan di Kalimantan Timur memiliki potensi yang sangat besar, namun masih terkendala Fasilitas yang belum memadai, dimana masih perlu pengembangan kapal penangkapan ikan dan pangkalan pendaratan ikan (PPI). Dari 8 (delapan) pangkalan pendaratan ikan (PPI) se Kaltim, rata rata 70 ton per hari. Industri Perikanan bakal dikembangkan jika Kalimantan Timur tangkapan ikan yang lebih besar dan didukung sarana yang memadai disamping itu peran pemerintah dalam memberikan fasilitas dalam hal perizinan juga peran swasta dalam mendukung program pemerintah. Pengembangan wisata bahari atau wisata laut untuk mendukung program program yang exsis dan prioritas yang pertama adalah pengembangan program perikanan tangkap baik laut maupun perairan umum, sungai dan danau kedua program pengembangan hutan mangrove dan ketiga program pengembangan diversifikasi usaha bagaimana produk produk ikan yang tidak ekonomis menjadi bernilai tambah. Korelasinya pengembangan wisata bahari dengan program-program adalah dalam rangka filosofi pembangunan perikanan. Seperti kita ketahui Kalimantan Timur terdiri dari 10 (sepuluh) Kabupaten dan Kota yang memiliki potensi pesisir laut, 7 kabupaten Kota itu adalah Kabupaten Paser, Kabupaten Panajam Paser Utara, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara, Kota Bontang, Kabupaten Kutai Timur dan Kabupaten Berau. Kalimantan Timur juga memiliki pulau-pulau yang sudah di daftarkan sebanyak 205 pulau, 18 diantaranya telah berpenghuni, 187 diantaranya belum berpenghuni dari 205 pulau pulau tersebut semuanya sudah memiliki nama, dengan adanya mitra bahari maka pemangku kepentingan di bidang pengelolaan diwilayah pesisir dan pulau pulau kecil dalam penguatan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, lembaga pendidikan, penyuluh, pendampingan pelatihan, penelitian terapan dan pengembangan rekomendasi kebijakan. Di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur saat ini memiliki ada 1200 UMKM (Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah) yang bergerak di bidang pengolahan karena sesuai ketentuan target 2017 – 2018 baik bidang tangkap, bidang budidaya kalau kita jumlah 414 ton dan 15% diantaranya atau 61 ribu diantaranya memang di khususkan hasil PROFIL PELUANG USAHA DAN INVESTASI KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN 5 hasil tangkapan atau budidaya
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Peminat Dan Terima Di Universitas Mulawarman
    DATA PEMINAT DAN TERIMA DI UNIVERSITAS MULAWARMAN JALUR SNMPTN 2020 PEMINAT PEMINAT Nama Provinsi Nama Kota NAMA SEKOLAH LULUS PL1 LULUS PL2 JML LULUS PL1 PL2 Kalimantan Timur Kab Berau MAN BERAU 20 4 15 4 SMA IT ASH SHOHWAH 1 SMA NEGERI 12 BERAU 26 8 25 1 9 SMAN 1 BERAU 33 13 28 13 SMAN 10 BERAU 1 1 SMAN 11 BERAU 6 1 6 1 SMAN 13 BERAU 3 1 SMAN 14 BERAU 1 1 SMAN 2 BERAU 37 8 33 8 SMAN 3 BERAU 20 5 18 1 6 SMAN 4 BERAU 28 7 21 2 9 SMAN 5 BERAU 17 2 9 1 3 SMAN 6 BERAU 14 1 12 1 SMAN 7 BERAU 28 6 19 6 SMAN 8 BERAU 37 8 34 1 9 SMAS MUHAMADIYAH TANJUNG REDEB 2 2 SMAS PGRI 13 TANJUNG REDEB 15 2 11 2 SMK NEGERI 8 BERAU 8 3 6 3 SMKN 1 BERAU 12 11 SMKN 2 BERAU 4 1 2 1 2 SMKN 6 BERAU 2 2 Kab Berau Total 315 69 257 7 76 Kab Kutai Barat MAN KUTAI BARAT 6 1 5 1 SMAN 1 BENTIAN BESAR 2 1 SMAN 1 BONGAN 6 5 SMAN 1 JEMPANG 6 1 4 1 SMAN 1 LINGGANG BIGUNG 39 11 29 1 12 SMAN 1 LONG IRAM 11 2 11 2 SMAN 1 MUARA LAWA 11 2 10 2 SMAN 1 MUARA PAHU 5 1 5 1 PEMINAT PEMINAT Nama Provinsi Nama Kota NAMA SEKOLAH LULUS PL1 LULUS PL2 JML LULUS PL1 PL2 SMAN 1 PENYINGGAHAN 10 3 7 3 SMAN 1 SENDAWAR 47 15 34 1 16 SMAN 1 SILUQ NGURAI 4 3 SMAN 2 SENDAWAR 19 10 15 10 SMAN 3 SENDAWAR 6 1 4 1 SMKN 1 SENDAWAR 16 5 16 5 SMKN 2 SENDAWAR 8 1 6 1 Kab Kutai Barat Total 196 53 155 2 55 Kab Kutai Kartanegara MA DDI KARYA BARU LOA JANAN 6 1 6 1 MA Negeri 1 Kutai Kartanegara 13 3 12 3 MAN 2 KUTAI KARTANEGARA 70 20 57 20 MAS AS ADIYAH SANTAN TENGAH 6 2 6 2 MAS MIFTAHUL ULUM ANGGANA 18 5 18 5 SMA AL HAYAT SAMBOJA 1 1 SMA ISLAM ULUMUDDIN SAMBOJA 2 1 2 1 SMA IT NURUL ILMI TENGGARONG 10 1 9 1
    [Show full text]
  • East Kalimantan
    PROVINCE INFOGRAPHIC EAST KALIMANTAN Nunukan NUNUKAN Tideng Pale Malinau TANA The boundaries and names shown and the TID UNG designations used on this map do not imply KOTA TARAKAN official endorsement or acceptance by the Tarakan United Nations. MA LINAU BULUNGAN Tanjungselor MOST DENSE LEAST DENSE Tanjung Selor Kota Balikpapan Malinau Tanjungredep MOST POPULATED LEAST POPULATED BERA U Kota Samarinda Tana Tidung 14 1,435 KUTAI DISTRICTS VILLAGES TIMUR Putussibau Sangatta 136 KAPU AS Ujoh Bilang HULU SUB-DISTRICTS Bontang SINTANG KOTA MU RUNG KUTAI BONTANG RAYA KARTANEGARA Legend: Sendawar KOTA SAMARIND A Administrative Boundary Tenggarong Samarinda Samarinda Province Province Capital Purukcahu District District Capital BARITO KUTAI GUNUN G UTARA BARAT MA S Population Transportation Muara Teweh PEN AJAM Population counts at 1km resolution Toll road PA SER Kuala Kurun UTARA KOTA Pasangkayu Primary road 0 BALIKPAPAN Secondary road 1 - 5 Balikpapan Port 6 - 25 Penajam BARITO KATINGAN Airport 26 - 50 SELATAN 51 - 100 Buntok KOTA Other KAPU AS TABALONG PASER 101 - 500 PALANGKA Kasongan Volcano 501 - 2,500 RAYA Tanah Grogot Tamiang Water/Lake 2,501 - 5,000 KOTAWARINGIN Layang Tobadak Tanjung 5,000 - 130,000 TIMUR Palangka Raya BARITO Coastline/River TIMUR Palangkaraya Paringin MA MUJU HULU BALANGAN SUNGAI Amuntai TAPIN UTARA Barabai HULU Sampit SUNGAI KOTA PULANG BARITO HULU SUNGAI Mamuju MA MASA SELATAN TEN GAH BARU GEOGRAPHY PISAU KUALA Mamuju TORA JA East Kalimantan is located at 4°24'N - 2°25'S and 113°44' - 119°00'E. The province borders with Malaysia, specifically Sabah and Sarawak (North), the Sulawesi Ocean and Makasar Straits (East), South Kalimantan (South) and West Kalimantan, Central Kalimantan and Malaysia (West).
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability E-ISSN:2598-6279 P-ISSN:2598-6260
    Indonesian Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability e-ISSN:2598-6279 p-ISSN:2598-6260 Research Paper Hotspot Distribution Analysis In East Kalimantan Province 2017-2019 to Support Forest and Land Fires Mitigation Nurwita Mustika Sari 1,2*, Nurina Rachmita 1, Masita Dwi Mandini Manessa1, 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Indonesia 2Remote Sensing Applications Center, LAPAN *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Forest and land fires that have occurred in the territory of East Kalimantan Province have caused immediate disaster to the area from year to year and become a global concern in recent years. Hotspots that potentially cause forest and land fires can be detected using satellites such as NOAA-20. The purposes of this study are to analyze the distribution pattern of hotspots in East Kalimantan Province during 2017-2019, identify areas with the highest risk of fires caused by the high intensity of hotspot. The method used in this study is the Nearest Neighbor Analysis and Kernel Density Estimation analysis. The results showed that the distribution pattern of hotspots in East Kalimantan Province during 2017-2019 was clustered with the highest intensity of hotspots were in Berau, East Kutai and Kutai Kartanegara Districts. And from the result of the analysis, the highest number of days has a peak hotspots on September each year. Keywords forest and land fires, hotspots, Nearest Neighbor, Kernel Density Estimation Received: 3 March 2020, Accepted: 24 March 2020 https://doi.org/10.26554/ijems.2020.4.1.28-33 1. INTRODUCTION the Extended Fuzzy C-Means (EFCM) method for large and very large data groups (Martino et al., 2018) and the use Forest and land fires in several locations in Indonesia such as Kalimantan and Sumatra occur almost every year with of the Extended Fuzzy C-Means Spatiotemporal algorithm larger areas and longer duration.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Indonesia's Highest-Profile Land Conflict
    Inside Indonesia’s highest-profile land conflict December 7, 2015 Masrani stood at the confluence of two rivers in Indonesian Borneo as his father recited the most dreadful oath. The extreme form of sumpah adat, a ritualistic nuclear option for Indonesia’s Dayak indigenous peoples, was reserved for dealing with crises nothing else could solve. The forest chattered to the post-daybreak sounds of hornbills and proboscis monkeys as the two-dozen men assembled for the rite. One by one, they beseeched the ancestors to punish those who had shifted their borders and robbed them of their territory. “They were brave enough to steal our land, but not to meet us at the river,” said Masrani, the deposed former chief of Muara Tae, a village in East Kalimantan province. “They didn’t come because they know they’re wrong.” Indonesia’s shambolic internal borders are a national emergency. No single map of land-use claims exists; contradictory references persist across the different levels of government. The problem impedes efforts to zone the country for sustainable development and underlies thousands of conflicts that pit communities against companies, the state or each other. Amid the chaos, oil palm plantations have sprung up at breakneck speed across Indonesia’s ravaged hinterlands, eating away at the forests and propelling this country of 250 million to become the world’s sixth-largest emitter of greenhouse gases. At the start of last century more than four-fifths of the archipelago was covered by jungle; today it is fighting to stem forest losses even in its national parks as species like the Javan tiger (Panthera tigris sondaica) fall away into extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Factors Affecting Food Productivity Improvement in Kalimantan Using Nonparametric Spatial Regression Method
    Modern Applied Science; Vol. 13, No. 11; 2019 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Identification of Factors Affecting Food Productivity Improvement in Kalimantan Using Nonparametric Spatial Regression Method Sifriyani1, Suyitno1 & Rizki. N. A.2 1Statistics Study Programme, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. 2Mathematics Education Study Programme, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. Correspondence: Sifriyani, Statistics Study Programme, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. E-mail: [email protected] Received: August 8, 2019 Accepted: October 23, 2019 Online Published: October 24, 2019 doi:10.5539/mas.v13n11p103 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n11p103 Abstract Problems of Food Productivity in Kalimantan is experiencing instability. Every year, various problems and inhibiting factors that cause the independence of food production in Kalimantan are suffering a setback. The food problems in Kalimantan requires a solution, therefore this study aims to analyze the factors that influence the increase of productivity and production of food crops in Kalimantan using Spatial Statistics Analysis. The method used is Nonparametric Spatial Regression with Geographic Weighting. Sources of research data used are secondary data and primary data obtained from the Ministry of Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia 12
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Indonesia Sumatra Kalimantan p509 p606 Sulawesi Maluku p659 p420 Papua p464 Java p58 Nusa Tenggara p320 Bali p212 David Eimer, Paul Harding, Ashley Harrell, Trent Holden, Mark Johanson, MaSovaida Morgan, Jenny Walker, Ray Bartlett, Loren Bell, Jade Bremner, Stuart Butler, Sofia Levin, Virginia Maxwell PLAN YOUR TRIP ON THE ROAD Welcome to Indonesia . 6 JAVA . 58 Malang . 184 Indonesia Map . 8 Jakarta . 62 Around Malang . 189 Purwodadi . 190 Indonesia’s Top 20 . 10 Thousand Islands . 85 West Java . 86 Gunung Arjuna-Lalijiwo Need to Know . 20 Reserve . 190 Banten . 86 Gunung Penanggungan . 191 First Time Indonesia . 22 Merak . 88 Batu . 191 What’s New . 24 Carita . 88 South-Coast Beaches . 192 Labuan . 89 If You Like . 25 Blitar . 193 Ujung Kulon Month by Month . 27 National Park . 89 Panataran . 193 Pacitan . 194 Itineraries . 30 Bogor . 91 Around Bogor . 95 Watu Karang . 195 Outdoor Adventures . 36 Cimaja . 96 Probolinggo . 195 Travel with Children . 52 Cibodas . 97 Gunung Bromo & Bromo-Tengger-Semeru Regions at a Glance . 55 Gede Pangrango National Park . 197 National Park . 97 Bondowoso . 201 Cianjur . 98 Ijen Plateau . 201 Bandung . 99 VANY BRANDS/SHUTTERSTOCK © BRANDS/SHUTTERSTOCK VANY Kalibaru . 204 North of Bandung . 105 Jember . 205 Ciwidey & Around . 105 Meru Betiri Bandung to National Park . 205 Pangandaran . 107 Alas Purwo Pangandaran . 108 National Park . 206 Around Pangandaran . 113 Banyuwangi . 209 Central Java . 115 Baluran National Park . 210 Wonosobo . 117 Dieng Plateau . 118 BALI . 212 Borobudur . 120 BARONG DANCE (P275), Kuta & Southwest BALI Yogyakarta . 124 Beaches . 222 South Coast . 142 Kuta & Legian . 222 Kaliurang & Kaliadem . 144 Seminyak .
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Capital City Relocation: a Perspective of Regional Planning
    Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Vol. 9 No.3, July – Augustus 2021 ISSN: 2338-4603 (print); 2355-8520 (online) Indonesia’s capital city relocation: A perspective of regional planning Farida Farida Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Persada Indonesia YAI, Jakarta, Indonesia Correspondence author email: [email protected] DOI: Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: 10.22437/ppd.v9i3.12013 04.02.2021 30.08.2021 30.08.2021 31.08.2021 Abstract The role of a capital city is essential for a nation. Indonesia‘s plan to relocate its capital from Jakarta to North Penajam Paser has been set in stone. The Indonesian government targets the relocation to be executed in 2024; therefore, the preparations and capital city development must start from 2020. This research aims to study capital relocation from the perspective of regional planning concerning institutional, spatial planning, the economy, social aspects, and the environment. The data source used in this research was the secondary data obtained from literature review and document analysis. The new capital must present a distinct identity, as it will determine the institutional that will lead to success. The main reasons for the capital relocation are growth and economic equality for the eastern part of Indonesia. It means that development will be encouraged to achieve these goals. On the other hand, overly rapid development in the new capital is also undesirable—a challenging paradox for the institutions involved that demands creativity and innovation for a successful capital relocation. Keywords: Environmental, Institutional, Regional planning, Spatial, The capital city JEL Classification: P25, Q01, R11 INTRODUCTION The plan to relocate the capital city has been stated in the 2020-2024 National Medium-Term Development Plan (2020-2024 RPJM), which specifies that the development will be on the administrative regions of North Penajam Paser Regency and Kutai Kartanegara Regency, East Kalimantan.
    [Show full text]
  • Perwakilan BPKP Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Lokasi : Tepian Sungai Mahakam Editor : Lutfi Budiarto BIGNEWS Edisi II Juni 2009 DAFTAR ISI
    Perwakilan BPKP Provinsi Kalimantan Timur Lokasi : Tepian Sungai Mahakam Editor : Lutfi Budiarto BIGNEWS Edisi II Juni 2009 DAFTAR ISI MEMBANGUN KALTIM UNTUK SEMUA, LAUNCHING SAMSAT ONLINE ............. 17 DARI REDAKSI ..............................................3 PERWAKILAN BPKP KALTIM FASILITASI PROFIL ............................................................6 DIKLAT SIMDA UNTUK AUDITOR BPK RI KALTIM........................................................ 19 SEKAPUR SIRIH ............................................8 PENERIMAAN PENGHARGAAN DARI KOMITE OLAH RAGA NASIONAL SATGAS SPIP BPKP INDONESIA (KONI) ATAS PARTISIPASI MENSOSIALISASIKAN SPIP KEPADA BPKP PERWAKILAN PROV. JAJARAN MUSPIDAPROV KALTIM PARA KALIMANTAN TIMUR DALAM BUPATI, WALIKOTA, KETUA DPRD DAN PIMPINAN SKPD SE KALIMANTAN PENYELENGGARAAN PON KE XVII TIMUR..............................................................9 PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR......... 20 BPKP KALTIM MERINTIS JALAN BPKP PERWAKILAN PROV. MENUJU PENGELOLAAN KALIMANTAN TIMUR MENGGANDENG PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK DAN SELURUH RSUD SE PROV. KALTIM DALAM RANGKA SOSIALISASI BERSIH. .........................................................10 PENERAPAN PPK-BLUD .......................... 22 SOSIALISASI SPIP : PERSIAPAN PENINGKATAN KAPASITAS : DIKLAT PENERAPAN SPIP DILINGKUNGAN BENDAHARAWAN PEMKAB. NUNUKAN23 PEMKOT BONTANG DAN BALIKPAPAN14 PRESENTASI HASIL EVALUASI GUBERNUR KALTIM MEMINTA KAPER PENERAPAN GCG PT. PUPUK KALTIM BPKP MEMBERIKAN ARAHAN DALAM OLEH BPKP PERWAKILAN PROV. RAPAT KERJA DAERAH...........................15
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Sustainability and Financial Performance of Local Government at East Kalimantan
    International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Publications ISSN (Online): 2581-6187 Financial Sustainability and Financial Performance of Local Government at East Kalimantan Muhammad Kadafi1, Amirudin2, Ratna Wulaningrum3 1, 2, 3Accounting Department, Samarinda State Polytechnic, Samarinda, Indonesia E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract— This study aims to determine and analysis Financial consumption of goods to consumption of services, and Sustainability, Trend Financial Sustainability, Map of Financial increasing new sources of income such as e-commerce. Performance and Financial Performance of city/regency (local Demands for good performance are often directed at local governments) in East Kalimantan in 2015-2019. The benefit of this governments to increase their regional financial independence. research is that it becomes input for local governments and To measure the level of success of a region in implementing provincial governments in making policies related to APBD. The analysis tool uses the calculation of financial sustainability, financial regional autonomy, it is necessary to evaluate the financial sustainability trends, quadrant methods, financial performance which performance management of local governments in Indonesia consists of the calculation of growth, share, elasticity, index X, IKK. [2]. Measurement is a concept that describes the process for This study also maps the performance of the LGR based on the evaluating performance finances in accordance with a set of Quadrant Method. The results of this study indicate that there are 5 rules [3]. Financial performance measurement aims to increase cities/regencies that have financial sustainability above the average local government accountability. Furthermore, the and 5 cities/regencies whose values are below the average. For 5 measurement of the government’s financial performance will years, Trend Financial Sustainability has grown, from a value of be useful in the process of making policies regarding regional 40.77%, 36.45%, 29.07%.
    [Show full text]
  • [School] [Course Title]
    [School] [Course title] Proceeding 4th ICTROPS 2020 i Proceeding 4th ICTROPS Proceeding4th ICTROPS2020 The4th International Conference on Tropical Studies and Its Applications Towards Sustainable Tropical Marine: A Holistic Approach for Welfare Development of Indonesia Samarinda, 27 October 2021 Proceeding 4th ICTROPS 2020 ii Judul: Proceeding 4th ICTROPS Tema: "Towards Sustainable Tropical Marine: A Holistic Approach for Welfare Development of Indonesia" Penulis: Tim Penulis 4th ICTROPS Editor dan tata letak Fahrizal Adnan Desain sampul Agung Yusuf, S.Sos Panitia: Steering Committee Prof. Dr. H. Masjaya, M.Si (Rector, Mulawarman Unversity) Prof. Dr. Ir. Mustofa Agung Sardjono Dr. Bohari Yusuf, M.Si Prof. Dr. Enos Tangke Arung, S.Hut Dr. Zeni Haryanto, M.Pd Dr. Anton Rahmadi, M.Sc Director Dr. Sc. Mustaid Yusuf, M.Sc Chairman Rusfina Widayati, S.T., M.Sc. Co-Chairman Ritbey Ruga, Ph.D. Secretary Dewi Embong Bulan, Ph.D. Co-Secretary Zhafira Kurnia Fitri, S.IP. Treasurer Dr. Nova Hariani, S.Si, M.Si Reviewer: Ir. Ghitarina, M.Sc. Dr. Anton Rahmadi, M.Sc Dr. Dewi Embong Bulan Ir. Fahrizal Adnan, M.Sc. Dr. Eng. Aji Ery Burhandenny Penerbit Mulawarman University Press Gedung A20 Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyrakat (LP2M) Universitas Mulawarman Jl. Krayan, Kampus Gn. Kelua Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur HAK CIPTA DILINDUNGI UNDANG-UNDANG . Dilarang keras menerjemahkan, menyalin, atau memperbanyak sebagian atau seluruh isi buku ini tanpa izin tertulis dari pemegang hak cipta. ISBN : 9786237480693 Penerbit : Mulawarman Press Proceeding 4th ICTROPS 2020 iii Kata Pengantar Puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT atas limpahan rahmat dan karunianya sehingga Buku Proceeding 4th ICTROPS tahun 2020 telah dapat diselesaikan.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (660Kb)
    ANALISIS EKONOMI WILAYAH PROVINSI KALIMANTAN TIMUR TAHUN 2011-2019 SKRIPSI Diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu persyaratan Mencapai derajat Sarjana S-1 Fakultas Geografi Oleh: Rivan Deny Pratama E100160159 FAKULTAS GEOGRAFI UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SURAKARTA 2021 i ii iii HALAMAN PERSEMBAHAN Alhamdulillah saya berterima kasih kepada Allah SWT atas rahmat dan hidayah yang diberikan, saya dapat menyelesaikan skripsi ini meskipun di tengah pandemic covid-19. Karya skripsi ini saya pesembahkan kepada: 1. Kedua orang tua saya dan adik yang sudah memberikan dukungan semangat dan motivasi. 2. Semua keluarga besar saya yang setiap kali bertemu selalu menanyakan “sudah lulus belum”. 3. Teman-teman Fakultas Geografi angkatan 2016 yang sudah memberikan waktu kebersamaan selama perkuliahan ini. iv INTISARI Kalimantan Timur merupakan sebuah provinsi di Indonesia dengan berbagai sumber daya alam yang terkandung didalamnya. Tetapi dengan adanya potensi tersebut ternyata pertumbuhan ekonomi tidak sejalan dengan baik, bahkan beberapa di tahun tertentu menunjukkan angka yang minus. Faktor yang mempengaruhi permasalahan tersebut adalah ketidakstabilan harga global terutama sektor tambang batubara yang akan berdampak pada sektor lain. Karena dilihat dari kondisi geologi sebagian besar wilayah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur mengandung mineral bahan tambang. Dari penelitian ini bertujuan: 1) Bagaimanakah tren pertumbuhan ekonomi wilayah di setiap kabupaten/kota? 2) Apa yang menjadi sektor unggulan dalam ekonomi wilayah Kalimantan Timur? 3) Bagaimanakah ketimpangan yang terjadi pada suatu wilayah yang terjadi di provinsi Kalimantan Timur? Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data sekunder. Dari data sekunder tersebut dianalisis menggunakan pertumbuhan ekonomi, Tipology Klassen, Locationt Quotient (LQ), dan Indeks Williamson. Dari hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa tren pertumbuhan ekonomi naik terjadi di Kota Bontang. Tren pertumbuhan ekonomi stabil (fluktuatif) terjadi di Kota Samarinda, Kota Balikpapan, dan Kabupaten Mahakam Ulu.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Under Vortex of Simultaneously Elections
    Natural Resources Under Vortex of Simultaneously Elections Semuel Risal1, Johnles2, Abner Herry Bajari3, Ika Devy Pramudiana4, Bartholomeus Padatu5 {[email protected], [email protected], abner. bajari@gmail3, [email protected], [email protected]} Polytechnic Malinau, North Kalimantan, Indonesia1, Polytechnic Malinau, North Kalimantan, Indonesia2, Universitas Cenderawasih Jayapura, Papua, Indonesia2, Universitas Dr. Sutomo, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia4, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) "AAN" Yogyakarta, Indonesia5 Abstract. The political phenomenon that develops in the democratic order in Indonesia shows that local election (Pilkada) has become a "political industry" that requires large capital for investment. This research explores the high cost of contest local elections, which is then used by the cukong to become a partner for politicians in hunting down rent through the Pilkada. Our findings show that the Pilkada becomes an arena for battle between cukong, and regions that have abundant natural resources are contested by large local and national cukong to finance all the needs of the candidate's campaign. They control natural resources, so they are the ones who decide who is the regent, who is the governor. Natural resources, especially coal mines, are occupied emphasize as one of the main sources of driving the political machine, which has an impact on bad environmental management practices. A large number of political party leaders and several businessmen who own mining, large-scale plantations have contributed to the destruction and overexploitation of nature. Therefore, the issue of natural resources must be included in the agenda of local and national political processes and break the chain of political cukong with transactional natural resource rulers.
    [Show full text]