DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Bibliography Allen, W. Sydney. 1973. Accent and Rhythm: ProsodicFeatures ofLAt in and Greek. A Study of Theory and Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ammann, H. 1922. Untersuchungen zur homerischen Wo rifolge und Satzstruktur. Freiburg: ]. Holtze. Arnheim, Rudolph. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press. Auerbach, Erich. 1953. Mimesis: TheRepres entation ofReality in We stern Literature, trans. Willard Trask. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Austin, Norman. 1966. "The Function of Digressions in the Diad. " Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 7: 295-3 12. Reprinted in Essays on the ''fliad.'' Selected Modern Criticism, ed. John Wright, 70-84. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1978. -. 1975. Archeryat the Dark ofthe Moon: Poetic Problems in Homer's "Odyssey." Berkeley: University of California Press. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 198 I. TheDia logic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. -. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. -. 1986. Speech Genres and Other LAteEssays, trans. Vern W. McGee. Austin: Univer­ sity of Texas Press. Bakker, Egbert]. 1988. Linguistics and Formulas in Homer: Scalarity and the Description of the Particle "Per."Amsterdam: Benjamins. -. 1990a. "Homerus als Orale Poezie: De Recente Ontwikkelingen." LAmpas 23: 3 84-405. -. I 990b. "Homeric Discourse and Enjambement: A Cognitive Approach." Tra ns­ actions ofthe American Philological Association 120: 1-21. -. 1991. "Foregrounding and Indirect Discourse: Temporal Subc1auses in a Herodo­ tean Short Story."Journal ofPra gmatics 16: 225-47. -. 1993a. "Activation and Preservation: The Interdependence of Text and Perfor­ mance in an Oral Tradition." Oral Tradition 8: 5-20. 21I 212 Bibliography -. 1993b. "Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and 'Presence' in Homeric Poetry." Classical Antiquity 12: 1-29. -. 1993C. "Topics, Boundaries, and the Structure of Discourse: An Investigation of the Particle de. " Studies in LAnguage 17: 275-31 I. -. 1993d. "Concession and Identification: The Diachronic Development of the Par­ " ticle 7tEp. In Miscellanea Linguistica Graeco-LAtina, ed. L. Isebaert, Collection d'etudes classiques 7, 1-17. Namur: Societe des etudes classiques. -. 1995. "Noun-Epithet Formulas, Milman Parry, and the Grammar of Poetry." In Homeric Questions, ed.]. P. Crielaard, 97-125. Amsterdam: Gieben. -. 1997a. "Storytelling in the Future: Truth, Time, and Tense in Homeric Epic." In Written Vo ices, Sp oken Signs, ed. Egbert ]. Bakker and Ahuvia Kahane. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. -. 1997b. "The Study of Homeric Discourse." In A New Companion to Homer, ed. Ian Morris and Barry Powell. Leiden: Brill. Bakker, Egbert]., and Florence Fabbricotti. 1991. "Peripheral and Nuclear Semantics in Homeric Diction: The Case of Dative Expressions fo r 'Spear.' '' Mnemosyne 44: 63-84· Bakker, Egbert]., and Nina van den Houten. 1992. "Aspects of Synonymy in Homeric Formulaic Diction: An Investigation of Dative Expressions fo r 'Spear.' '' Classical Philology 87: 1-13· Bakker, Egbert ]., and Ahuvia Kahane, eds. 1997. Written Vo ices, Spoken Signs: Perfor­ mance, Tradition, and the Ep ic Text. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Bannert, Herbert. 1988. Formen des Wiederholens bei Homer: Beispielefur eine Poetik des Ep os. Wien: Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Barnes, Harry R. 1986. "The Colometric Structure of Homeric Hexameter." Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27: 125-50. Bartlett, E 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cam­ bridge: Cambridge University Press. Bassett, Samuel E. 1938. The Poetry of Homer. Sather Classical Lectures IS. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bauman, Richard. 1992. "Contextualization, Tradition, and the Dialogue of Genres: Icelandic Legends of the KrciftaskaJd. " In Rethinking Context: LAnguage as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. AlessandroDuranti and Charles Goodwin, Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language II, 125-45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Biiuml, Franz H. 1980. "Varieties and Consequences of Medieval Literacy and Illit- eracy." Sp eculum 55: 237-65· -. 1984. "Medieval Texts and the Two Theories of Oral-Formulaic Composition: A Proposal fo r a Third Theory." New LiteraryHis tory 16: 31-49. -. 1993. "VerschriftlichteMiindlichkeit und vermiindlichte Schriftlichkeit: Begriffs­ priifungen an den Fallen Heliand und Liber Evangeliorum. " In Schrifilichkeit imjrUhen Mittelalter, ed. Ursula Schaefer, ScriptOralia 53, 254-66. Tiibingen: Gunter Narr. Beaman, Karen. 1984. "Coordination and Subordination Revisited: Syntactic Com­ plexity in Spoken and Written Narrative Discourse." In Coherence in Sp oken and Written Discourse, ed. Deborah Tannen, Advances in Discourse Processes 12, 45-80. Norwood, N.].: Ablex. Bibliography 213 Beck, William. 1986. "Choice and Context: Metrical Doublets fo r Hera." American Jo urnal qfPhilology 107: 480-88. Becker, Andrew Sprague. 1992. "Reading Poetry through a Distant Lens: Ecphrasis, Ancient Greek Rhetoricians, and the Pseudo-Hesiodic 'Shield ofHerakles.' " Ameri­ can Journal of Philology 113: 5-24. Beekes, Robert S. P. 1972. "On the Structure of the Hexameter: O'Neill Interpreted." Glotta 50: 1-10. Berg, Nils. 1978. "Parergon metricum: Der Ursprung des griechischen Hexameters." MiinchenerStudien zur Sp rachwissenschaji 37: I 1-36. Beye, Charles Rowan. 1964. Homeric Battle Narrativeand Catalogues." Harvard Studies in Classical Philology68: 345-73. Bolinger, Dwight. 1961. "Syntactic Blends and Other Matters." Language 37= 366-81. Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brugmann, K., and A. Thumb. 1913. Griechische Grammatik. Munich: Beck. Buhler, K. 1934. Sp rachtheorie: Die Darstellungsjunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer. 1965. Reprint, Stuttgart: Fischer. Burkert, Walter. 1987. "The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century B.C. : Rhapsodes versus Stesichoros." In Papers on the Amasis Pa inter and His Wo rld, 43-62. Malibu, Calif. : GettyMuseum. Buswell, Guy T. 1935. How People Look at Pictures: A Study qfthe Psychology of Perception in Art, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cable, Thomas. 1974. TheMeter and Melody qf Beowulf. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. -. 1991. "The Meter and Musical Implications of Old English Poetry." In The Union qfWo rds and Music in Medieval Poetry, ed. Rebecca A. Baltzer, Thomas Cable, and James I. Wimsatt, 49-71. Austin: University of Texas Press. Cairns, Douglas L. 1993. Aidos: ThePsycholo gy and Ethics qfHonourand Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Cerquiglini, Bernard. 1989. Bloge de la variante: Histoire critique de la philologie. Paris: Seuil. Chadwick, H. M., and N. K. Chadwick. 1932-40. The Growth qfLiterature. Cam­ bridge: Cambridge University Press. Chafe, Wallace. 1980. "The Deployment of Consciousness in the Production of a Narrative." In ThePear Stories, ed. Wallace Chafe, 9-50. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. -. 1982. "Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature." In Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. Deborah Tannen, 35- 53. Norwood,NJ. : Ablex. -. 1985. "Linguistic Differences Produced by Differences between Speech and Writ­ ing." 1985. In Literacy, Language, and Learning: TheNa ture and Consequences qfReadin g and Writing, ed. David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance, and Angela Hildyard, 105-23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -. 1987. "Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow." In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. Russel S. Tomlin, Typological Studies in Language II, 21-51. Amster­ dam: Benjamins. -. 1988. "Linking Intonation Units in Spoken English." In Clause Combining in 214 Bibliography Grammar and Discourse, ed. John Haiman and Sandra A. Thompson, Typological Studies in Language 18, 1-27. Amsterdam: Benjamins. -. 1990. "Some Things That Narratives Tell Us about the Mind." In Narrative Thought and Narrative Language, ed. Bruce K. Britton and A. D. Pellegrini, 79-98. Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates. -. 1993. "Seneca Speaking Styles and the Location ofAuthorit y." In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, ed. Jane H. Hill and Judith T. Irvine, 72-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: TheFlow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speech and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -, ed. 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects ofNa rrative Production. Advances in Discourse Processes 3. Norwood, NJ.: Ablex. Chantraine, Pierre. 1948-53. Grammaire homerique. 2 vols. Paris: Klincksieck. Clanchy, M. T. 1993. From Memory to Written Record: ' England 1066-1307. London: Edward Arnold. Clark, Matthew. 1994. "Enjambment and Binding in Homeric Hexameter." Phoenix 48: 95-II4· Cole, Thomas. 1991. TheOri gins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UniversityPre ss. Cosset, Evelyne. 1990. "Les fo rmules de Zeus au vocatif dans I'Diade. L'Antiquite Clas­ sique 69: 5-16. d'Aquili, Eugene, and Charles D. Laughlin,Jr. 1979. "The Neurobiologyof Myth and Ritual." In TheSp ectrum of Ritual, ed. E. d'Aquili, C. D. Laughlin, and]. McManus. New York: Columbia University Press. Davis, Gerald L. 1985. I Got the Wo rld in Me and I Can Sing It, Yo u Know: A Study oJthe Performed Afr ican-American
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparative Research on Oral Traditions: a Memorial for Milman Parry
    160 BOOK REVIEWS James W . Heisig Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture Nagoya, Japan Foley, John M iles, editor. Comparative Research on Oral Traditions: A Memorial for Milman Parry. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, 1987. 597 pages. Hardcover US$29.95. ISBN 0-89357-173-3. As every folklorist knows, the co-founders of the modern study of oral poetry are the classicist M ilman Parry and his student, the slavicist Albert Lord. Lord has had his festschrift: Oral Traditional Literature: A Festschrift for Albert Bates Lord, ed. John Miles Foley (1981). The prolific editor of that work has also given us the standard bibliography_ Oral-Formulaic Theory and Research: An Introduction and Annotated Bibliography (1984)_as well as a welcome history~The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology (1988)— of the Parry-Lord theory and its in­ fluence. Now Foley has produced a memorial festschrift for Parry, who died in 1935. The work starts off with a preface by Albert Lord, a pleasantly anecdotal re­ flection on Parry’s life and influence. It is followed by the editor’s somewhat con­ fusing introduction. According to Foley, “ Parry’s activity in the field . • initiated the comparative method in oral literature research ” (18). Foley goes on to say that “ Africa, with its plethora of tongues and traditions, is beginning to yield startling new information about oral tradition and culture, while some of the most ancient civi­ lization of the world, among them the Indie, Sumerian, and Hittite, also show signs of oral transmission of tales,” and he concludes these thoughts with the assertion that “ [t]his enormous field of research and scholarship, still in its relative infancy, is ul­ timately the bequest of M ilm an Parry ” (19).
    [Show full text]
  • Compound Diction and Traditional Style in Beowulf and Genesis A
    Oral Tradition, 6/1 (1991): 79-92 Compound Diction and Traditional Style in Beowulf and Genesis A Jeffrey Alan Mazo One of the most striking features of Anglo-Saxon alliterative poetry is the extraordinary richness of the vocabulary. Many words appear only in poetry; almost every poem contains words, usually nominal or adjectival compounds, which occur nowhere else in the extant literature. Creativity in coining new compounds reaches its apex in the 3182-line heroic epic Beowulf. In his infl uential work The Art of Beowulf, Arthur G. Brodeur sets out the most widely accepted view of the diction of that poem (1959:28): First, the proportion of such compounds in Beowulf is very much higher than that in any other extant poem; and, secondly, the number and the richness of the compounds found in Beowulf and nowhere else is astonishingly large. It seems reasonable, therefore, to regard the many unique compounds in Beowulf, fi nely formed and aptly used, as formed on traditional patterns but not themselves part of a traditional vocabulary. And to say that they are formed on traditional patterns means only that the character of the language spoken by the poet and his hearers, and the traditional tendency towards poetic idealization, determined their character and form. Their elevation, and their harmony with the poet’s thought and feeling, refl ect that tendency, directed and controlled by the genius of a great poet. It goes without saying that the poet of Beowulf was no “unwashed illiterate,” but a highly trained literary artist who could transcend the traditional medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Resume Ed 047 563 Fl 002 036 Author Title Institution Pub Date
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 047 563 FL 002 036 AUTHOR Willcock, M. M. TITLE The Present State of Homeric Studies. INSTITUTION Joint Association of Classical Teachers, Oxford (England). PUB DATE 67 NOTE 11p. JOURNAL CIT Didaskalos; v2 n2 p59-69 1967 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Classical Literature, *Epics, *Greek, *Greek Literature, Historical Reviews, Humanism, Literature Reviews, Oral Reading, *Poetry, *Surveys, World Literature IDENTIFIEIAS *Homer, Iliad, Odyssey ABSTRACT A personal point of view concerning various aspects of Homerica characterizes this brief state-of-the-art report. Commentary is directed to:(1) first readers; (2) the Parry-Lord approach to the study of the "Iliad" and the "Odyssey" as representatives of a type of oral, formulaic, poetry;(3) analysts, unitarians, and neo-analysts; (4) recent publications by British scholars;(5) archaeology and history; (6) language and meter; and (7) the "Odyssey". (RL) fromDidaskalos; v2 n2 p59-69 1967 The present state of Homeric studies teN 1111 m.M. WILL COCK U.S. DEPARTMENT OF MOH. EDUCATION d WELFARE Nft OFFICE OF EDUCATION ".74P THIS DOCUMENT HAS BUN REPRODUCED EAACTLYAS RECEIVED ROM THE VIcV4 OD OPoivs PERSON OR ORGANIZAME eRI43!!th!!!!r:!I . V.1.14TI OF EDUCATION Ca STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE Um, POSITION OR POLICY. A select reading-list of Homerica, with a running com- Introduction mentary, cannot fail to be invidious. There is little chance that one person can fairly survey the vast fieldAll that I can offer is my own view-point, more literary than archaeological or linguistic. As to the limits of the survey, I have endeavoured to go far enough back in each separate aspect to clarify the present situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Works by John Miles Foley
    This article belongs to a special issue of Oral Tradition published in honor of John Miles Foley’s 65th birthday and 2011 retirement. The surprise Festschrift, guest-edited by Lori and Scott Garner entirely without his knowledge, celebrates John’s tremendous impact on studies in oral tradition through a series of essays contributed by his students from the University of Missouri- Columbia (1979-present) and from NEH Summer Seminars that he has directed (1987-1996). http://journal.oraltradition.org/issues/26ii This page is intentionally left blank. Oral Tradition, 26/2 (2011): 677-724 Annotated Bibliography of Works by John Miles Foley Compiled by R. Scott Garner In 1985 John Miles Foley authored as his first book-length work Oral-Formulaic Theory and Research: An Introduction and Annotated Bibliography. This volume, which provided an introduction to the field of study and over 1800 annotated entries, was later supplemented by updates published in Oral Tradition (and compiled by John himself, Lee Edgar Tyler, Juris Dilevko, and Catherine S. Quick [with the assistance of Patrick Gonder, Sarah Feeny, Amerina Engel, Sheril Hook, and Rosalinda Villalobos Lopez]) that served both to summarize and to provide reflection upon new developments in an area of scholarship that eventually became too vast and broadly evolved to be contained by any single bibliographic venture. Given that John’s own work was instrumental in effecting this sustained development—while also having importance in so many other areas of study as well—it seems only fitting to close the current volume with an annotated bibliography of John’s works up through the current point in time.
    [Show full text]
  • D101 Forewordtoanessay.Pdf (927.5Kb)
    A foreword to an essay by Charles de Lamberterie The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nagy, Gregory. 2017.11.17. "A foreword to an essay by Charles de Lamberterie." Classical Inquiries. http://nrs.harvard.edu/ urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries. Published Version https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/draft-of-a-foreword-to- an-essay-by-charles-de-lamberterie/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:40827372 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Classical Inquiries Editors: Angelia Hanhardt and Keith Stone Consultant for Images: Jill Curry Robbins Online Consultant: Noel Spencer About Classical Inquiries (CI ) is an online, rapid-publication project of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies, devoted to sharing some of the latest thinking on the ancient world with researchers and the general public. While articles archived in DASH represent the original Classical Inquiries posts, CI is intended to be an evolving project, providing a platform for public dialogue between authors and readers. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries for the latest version of this article, which may include corrections, updates, or comments and author responses. Additionally, many of the studies published in CI will be incorporated into future CHS pub- lications. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:CHS.Online_Publishing for a complete and continually expanding list of open access publications by CHS.
    [Show full text]
  • Milman Parry , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 30:3 (1989) P.341
    MERRITT SALE, WILLIAM, The Trojans, Statistics, and Milman Parry , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 30:3 (1989) p.341 The Trojans, Statistics, and Milman Parry William Merritt Sale I. Introduction When we examine noun-epithet formulae in all the grammatical cases for the Trojans of the Iliad, we are struck by a remarkable fact: with two exceptions,1 no one formula is repeated exactly more than a few times. This is most evident in the nominative, where all the other characters who occur anything like as often as the Trojans display at least one, and usually several, noun-epithets repeated precisely: the same words, the same grammatical case, the same position in the hexameter. Twenty-six of the familiar Homeric char­ acters repeat a formula at least 10 times; the Trojans, who are men­ tioned more often than 16 of these 26, have no formula at all in the nominative case repeated more than 4 times. Since noun-epithet formulae have come to be regarded as the very staples of Homeric composition, the Trojan deficit-or apparent deficit-requires an explanation. 2 This might appear to be merely a matter of pointing to the noun­ epithet formulae for the Trojans and the others, and counting. But pointing and counting are not enough. For one thing, the Trojans might be defective in the number and occurrences of all their formulae, and not simply in noun-epithets; therefore we must in­ quire whether the Trojans possess as many formulae as the others, and whether these formulae occur as often. For another, the Trojans might possess formulae of a different kind, which Homer employed instead of noun-epithets.
    [Show full text]
  • Article on Milman Parry's Research
    1 HOMER AND ORAL POETRY BY SPECIAL THANKS TO: THE YALE CLASSICS DEPARTMENT SARAH PRICE THE YALE ART GALLERY JOHN MATTHEWS Who was Homer? When did he live? Was there VICTOR BERS even a Homer? If so, did he write both the Iliad and the KAY CLAIBORN Odyssey? Although the Homeric Question has intrigued JOCK REYNOLDS scholars for millennia, many uncertainties remain about CHARLENE SENICAL the true authorship of the epics. In the past century, inquiry has focused on the role of oral composition in the creation of the Homeric texts. Theories of oral poetry composition were created through the observation of modern oral bards in pre-literate societies and applied to the Iliad and the Odyssey. The recent discovery of the prominent role of the oral tradi- tion in the Homeric texts does not, however, eliminate the role played by Homer; his inventiveness is a major part of what makes the epics shine. In the 1930s, Milman Parry (1902-1935) and Albert Lord (1912- 2001) first proposed the theory that the Homeric epics were composed orally. After studying the Iliad and A Yugoslavian Oral Poet the Odyssey, Parry was convinced The Milman Parry Collection that Homer’s poems were both traditional tales and cre- ative compositions, despite the apparent contradiction. But how could Homer have both inherited the songs and 1 2 HOMER AND ORAL POETRY written them himself? Parry answered the question, ap- plying what today is known as oral theory to the Homeric texts to explain epithets and parallelism. Many of the words in this debate have slightly un- usual connotations.
    [Show full text]
  • Milman Parry and AL Kroeber: Americanist Anthropology and The
    Oral Tradition, 16/1 (2001): 58-84 Milman Parry and A. L. Kroeber: Americanist Anthropology and the Oral Homer John F. García The view of Homer which . was to render earlier scholarship obsolete . was apparently arrived at by the reaction of an unusual mind to the text of Homer: nothing in Parry’s background (middle-class, not particularly intellectual, Welsh Quaker origins), nor in the place where he was born and lived until he went to France in 1923 . makes that reaction likely. Parry’s teachers in Greek at the University of California included two of the finest Hellenists of their generation, George Calhoun (1888-1942) and Ivan Linforth (b. 1879). Both men knew Homer well and had a sensitive understanding of his poetry. But they were not the source of any of Parry’s specific ideas. His work was as much a surprise to them as to the rest of the world. The mind that presented Homer to the world as the singer of traditional poetry was itself the product of no traditions. A. Parry 1971:xxii-xxiii Introduction Milman Parry’s mythic reputation derives from the brilliance of his scholarship, the suaveness of his rhetoric, a mysterious and untimely death, and above all his standing as a revered ancestor of American Homeric scholarship in the predominant form it now takes. Adam Parry’s words enhance the sense of something unaccountable, even miraculous, in his father’s genius; yet we can read them today, if we want to take the study of intellectual history seriously, only with a skeptical eye.
    [Show full text]
  • The Composition of the Iliad
    Sam Watson Greek 336 Dr. Jonathan Fenno November 28, 2007 The Composition of the Iliad The origins of Homer’s Iliad, the earliest work of the Western literary tradition, are shrouded in mystery. Nothing can be said with certainty about its author, and some scholars even question the notion of a single historical Homer. For many centuries, the Iliad had been regarded as a literary poem, adumbrations and occasional remarks aside. However, as evidence was surfacing that our picture of the early text of the Iliad was not complete, some scholars in the early and middle eighteenth century raised new questions about Homer, without outlining any theories or methods of approaching them. The course was set, though, when in 1795 the Prolegomena ad Homerum of the scholar F. A. Wolf of the Prussian University of Halle established the framework for the exploration of the early development of the Iliad and the Odyssey. He advocated the application of critical and historical analysis as the only acceptable method of restoring the text, and he denounced incorporating criteria based on poetic taste [5]. Based on his assertion that writing was not used for literary purposes during the time of the Iliad’s composition, he conjectured that the poem was constructed by illiterate poets in separate pieces and did not achieve written form until much later than supposed by the ancients: Herodotus proposes the tenth century, Wolf the sixth. His position set the stage for a division among the scholarship which persists to this day. The ‘Analysts,’ siding with Wolf, point out the incongruities and contradictions in the poem (such as the death of Pylaemenes preceding a scene where he weeps for the loss of his son) and suggest that the creative force behind the Iliad is a long line of oral poets.
    [Show full text]
  • EDITING and Translating TRADITIONAL ORAL EPIC: the SOUTH Slavic SONGS and HOMER
    CHAPTER ONE EDITING AND TRANSlATING TRADITIONAL ORAL EPIC: THE SOUTH SlAVIC SONGS AND HOMER JOHN MILES FOLEY In the mid-1930s Milman Parry journeyed to the former Yugoslavia to test his hypothesis that Homer was a traditional oral poet, and that the Iliad and Odyssey that have reached us bear the unmistak- able signs of an oral traditional heritage. Together with Albert Lord and their native assistant Nikola Vujnovic, he recorded hundreds of epic narratives from South Slavic guslari, or oral poets, and samples of these performances from the regions of Novi Pazar and Bijelo Polje have been transcribed, edited, and translated in the series Serbo­ Groatian Heroic Songs. It is chiefly on this evidence-most of which remains unpublished in the Milman Parry Collection of Oral Liter- ature at Harvard University-that Lord based his epochal book, The Singer if Tales, and from which the comparative field of studies in oral tradition has since taken root. To say that the South Slavic oral epic tradition was instrumental in rediscovering ancient Greek oral- ity is thus a vast understatement; from a historical perspective the guslar's performances were from the beginning a sine qua non.' This chapter is intended as a prospectus on a long-term project, a map that charts a pathway toward its eventual goal: providing usable original-language editions and English-language translations I On the history of the Oral-Formulaic Theory, see j.M. Foley, 1he 1heory if Oral Composition: History and Methodology (Bloomington, 1988, repr. 1992); for bibli- ography, j.M. Foley, Oral-Fonnulaic 1heory and Research: An Introduction and Annotated Bibliography (New York, 1988), with updates in Oral Tradition I (1986), 767-808, 3 (1988), 191-228, and 12 (1997), 366-484--also available online at the following URL: http://www.oraltradition.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric A. Havelock and the Origins of Philosophy by Jeremy Eleazer
    Eric A. Havelock and the Origins of Philosophy by Jeremy Eleazer Fisher Eric A. Havelock and the Origins of Philosophy A Thesis Submitted to The Institute For Christian Studies partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Philosophical Foundations History of Philosophy By Jeremy Eleazer Fisher Toronto, Ontario September, 1991 To My Family and Phil & Ray "...THERE IS HARDLY ANYTHING that can make one happier than to feel that one counts for something with other people. What matters here is not numbers, but intensity. In the long run, human relationships are the most important thing in life; the modern 'efficient' man can do nothing to change this, nor can the demigods and lunatics who know nothing about human relationships. God uses us in his dealings with others." —Dietrich Bonhoeffer Contents 1 Key to Havelock References i 2 Introduction 1 3 Chapter One 16 Section A: The Alphabet 1 8 Section B: The Homeric/Platonic Antithesis 2 6 a) Homer and Orality b) Plato and Literacy 3 1 Section C: The Presocratics and Socrates 3 7 a) The Presocratic Philosophers b) Socrates 4 9 4 Chapter Two 5 8 5 Bibliography 8 2 Key to Eric A. Havelock References I have gleaned Havelock's observations from his major works dealing exclusively with the oral/literate question The following works are listed by publication date but are not exhaustive: Preface to Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963, hereafter referred to as Preface; "Preliteracy and the Presocratics." In Institute of Classical Studies Bulletin No. 13: 44-67. University of London, 1966, hereafter referred to as "Preliteracy"; "Prologue to Greek Literacy." In University of Cincinnati Classical Studies II, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6, Selected Papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure As
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Research Report 17: Selected papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure as Reflected by History, Anthropology Department Research Reports series Demography and Oral Tradition 6-1977 Chapter 6, Selected Papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure as Reflected by History, Demography and Oral Tradition Joel Halpern University of Massachusetts - Amherst Barbara Halpern University of Massachusetts - Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt17 Part of the Anthropology Commons Halpern, Joel and Halpern, Barbara, "Chapter 6, Selected Papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure as Reflected by History, Demography and Oral Tradition" (1977). Research Report 17: Selected papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure as Reflected by History, Demography and Oral Tradition. 8. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/anthro_res_rpt17/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology Department Research Reports series at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Report 17: Selected papers on a Serbian Village: Social Structure as Reflected by History, Demography and Oral Tradition by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 6 RESEARCH ON ORAL TRADITIONAL EXPRESSION IN ~UMA D!JA • AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE STUDY OF OTHER ORAL TRADITIONS by John Miles Foley Milman Parry Collection of Oral Literature , Harvard The nUl'pose of this paper is t o repo rt the results of a Joint interdisciplinary endeavor , !'Aspects o f SerbiaJl Oral ExpressionJ~ an NEH-sponsored investigation, the field phase of which was carried on in Orafac during 1975 , 1 The f ocus of the project was the oral culture of a Serbian village, as it exists not only in f ormally recog­ ni~ed prose and poetic genres like the folktale or ~picJ but ~lBo in more informal genres such as the genealogy and healing charm.
    [Show full text]