DOCSLIB.ORG

25200 SW Parkway Ave. Suite 3 | Wilsonville | Oregon | 97070  | 800-757-3724 [email protected] Arlington Region, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
25200 SW Parkway Ave. Suite 3 | Wilsonville | Oregon | 97070  | 800-757-3724 Info@Esci.Us Arlington Region, Washington 25200 SW Parkway Ave. Suite 3 | Wilsonville | Oregon | 97070 www.esci.us | 800-757-3724 [email protected] Arlington Region, Washington Arlington Fire Department Island Co. Fire District #1 North County Regional Fire Authority Snohomish Co. Fire District #15 Snohomish Co. Fire District #19 Snohomish Co. Fire District #21 Snohomish Co. Fire District #24 Opportunities for Collaborative Efforts Feasibility Study September 2013 Prepared By: Don Bivins Jim Broman Lane Wintermute Dan DeHaven Rob Strong Arlington Region, Washington Cooperative Efforts Feasibility Study Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Challenges (SWOC) .......................................... 5 Evaluation of Current Conditions ............................................................................................ 9 Organization Overview ........................................................................................................... 9 Organization Overview Assessment ................................................................................ 17 Management Components ................................................................................................... 30 Management Components Assessment .......................................................................... 38 Fiscal Management .............................................................................................................. 45 Fiscal Management Assessment ..................................................................................... 57 Staffing and Personnel Management .................................................................................. 111 Staffing & Personnel Management Assessment ............................................................ 127 Service Delivery and Performance ..................................................................................... 131 Demand Study ............................................................................................................... 131 Distribution ..................................................................................................................... 139 Concentration ................................................................................................................ 150 Reliability ....................................................................................................................... 154 Performance .................................................................................................................. 156 Analysis of Emergency Service Delivery & Performance ............................................... 160 Support Programs – Emergency Services Training ............................................................ 166 Training Assessment ..................................................................................................... 175 Support Programs – Fire Prevention .................................................................................. 182 Fire Prevention Assessment .......................................................................................... 190 Emergency Medical Services ............................................................................................. 195 EMS System Assessment .............................................................................................. 198 Capital Facilities and Equipment ........................................................................................ 201 Fire Stations .................................................................................................................. 204 Apparatus ...................................................................................................................... 231 Future Opportunities for Collaborative Efforts ................................................................... 241 Processes for Collaboration................................................................................................ 241 General Partnering Options ................................................................................................ 241 Strategies for Shared Services ........................................................................................... 250 Operational Goals .............................................................................................................. 252 Goal 1 – Consolidate Agency Training Programs into a Single Training Division ........... 252 Goal 2 – Logistics .......................................................................................................... 255 Goal 3 – Combine Volunteer Services ........................................................................... 260 Goal 4 – Implement Peak Activity Units (PAUs) ............................................................. 262 Governance (Policy) Strategies .......................................................................................... 270 Governance Strategy 1: Regional Fire Authority with AFD, Snohomish #19, and Snohomish #21 .............................................................................................................. 270 Governance Strategy 2: Regional Fire Authority between CIF&R and NCRFA ............. 276 Page i Arlington Region, Washington Cooperative Efforts Feasibility Study Governance Strategy 3: Regional Fire Authority with Snohomish #15 and the Tulalip Tribe .............................................................................................................................. 283 Governance Strategy 4: NCRFA, Snohomish #15, and Snohomish #19 ........................ 285 Implementation of Goals and Strategies ............................................................................. 292 Policy Actions ................................................................................................................ 292 Guidance ....................................................................................................................... 292 Partnering Consideration Factors and Pitfalls ................................................................ 293 Implementation Timelines and Milestones ..................................................................... 296 Cost Apportionment ....................................................................................................... 296 Cost Allocation Options .................................................................................................. 297 Findings ................................................................................................................................. 307 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 309 So, Now What? ...................................................................................................................... 311 Appendices ........................................................................................................................... 317 Appendix A: Table of Figures ............................................................................................. 317 Appendix B: Summary Table of Recommended Actions (Current Conditions) .................... 323 Arlington Fire Department .............................................................................................. 323 Camano Island Fire & Rescue ....................................................................................... 323 Snohomish County Fire District #15 ............................................................................... 324 Snohomish County Fire District #19 ............................................................................... 325 Snohomish County Fire District #21 ............................................................................... 326 Snohomish County Fire District #24 ............................................................................... 328 North County Regional Fire Authority ............................................................................. 330 Page ii Arlington Region, Washington Cooperative Efforts Feasibility Study Acknowledgements Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) would like to acknowledge that without the ready assistance and support of the fire chiefs and the staffs of the Arlington Fire Department (AFD), Island County Fire District #1 (Camano Island Fire & Rescue or CIF&R), Snohomish County Fire District #15 (FD #15 or Snohomish #15), Snohomish County Fire District #19 (FD #19 or Snohomish #19), Snohomish County Fire District #21 (FD #21 or Snohomish #21), Snohomish County Fire District #24 (FD #24 or Snohomish #24), and North County Regional Fire Authority (NCRFA), this project could not have been completed. Each fire chief was available to the project team in advance of the first day of site work and continuously throughout the project life. The fire chiefs communicated with each other and respected the designated point person on behalf of the seven agencies, Chief Bruce Stedman. In short, this report reflects the efforts of a professional and committed group of organizations which invests themselves in the quest for improvement. Arlington Fire Department Bruce Stedman,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June /July 2006
    Washington Rail News June /July 2006 www.washarp.org [email protected] Publication of the Washington Association of Rail Passengers A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." King Street Station’s 100 th anniversary Amtrak President David th Hughes speaks to the NARP celebration wraps up July 1 with start of 4 David Hughes, acting president and Seattle-Portland Amtrak Cascades roundtrip CEO of Amtrak, told the NARP board of th directors that Amtrak is on the right track The 100 anniversary celebration of Pullman Railroad Company, Railway after former President Seattle’s historic King Street Station Express Agency, and Sound Transit. David Gunn brought kicked off on May 10. The ongoing One honoree was Amtrak station agent the company back celebration will wrap up on July 1 with a Marlene Koob, who has followed in the from the brink of full day of festivities. Events will include footsteps of her father and grandfather bankruptcy and near- the launch of the fourth daily roundtrip in working at the station. certain liquidation in between Seattle and Portland. More One aspect of the centennial cele- 2002. Key positive in- information on centennial events hap- bration is the collection of oral histories David Hughes dicators include: from people that have special memo- • Revenue per ries of the station. Though it’s too late passenger mile is up 10% so far in to participate in the live interview pro- 2006 over 2005. gram, you can still provide your • Amtrak has had consecutive years thoughts via the station centennial of ridership growth, going from website Click on the Share Your 21.7 mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations
    Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations Kory Kramer and David Schmitz University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS Geography 569 GIS Workshop August 23, 2013 2 Acknowledgments We would like to thank our project sponsor, Tim Parham, for the direction and guidance provided to us as we developed this project. He was quick to respond to tight deadlines and provided valuable feedback through early iterations of the TOD Walkshed Map. We would also like to thank Rebeccah Maskin and Stefan Coe of PSRC. Rebeccah’s thorough understanding of the land use data and its processing was invaluable in our efforts to arrive at defensible transit-supportive density numbers. Stefan provided the data necessary to get us started as well as the Python script used to create the 2012 slope-constrained walksheds. Dan Landes of Shelter Resources, Inc. provided valuable insight during the design considerations phase of the project, and important input after testing the penultimate version of the online TOD Walkshed Map. Contacts who provided transit data include Kit Na Davies and Jeff Anderson with Community Transit, Ruth Kinchen of Metro Transit, Erin Hunter and Teri Lapetino of Sound Transit, and Sabina Pope of Everett Transit. Thank you for going out of your way to figure out ways to send large datasets. Your help is greatly appreciated. We would like to recognize Ryan Curren and Elliott Barnett’s thoughtful comments on how the TOD Walkshed Map might be used by them and their colleagues. Thank you, Ryan and Elliott, for taking time out of your busy schedules to help us envision where our project will go after we hand it off.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodal Connectivity Analysis and Candidate Improvements
    WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 | APPENDIX C APPENDIX C: PASSENGER RAIL MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS AND CANDIDATE IMPROVEMENTS Overview This memorandum presents a multimodal connectivity analysis, identification of gaps in the multimodal network, and candidate access improvements for the fourteen passenger rail stations that are served by Amtrak Cascades in Portland, Oregon; Washington; and Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. Additionally, system-wide candidate improvements are identified that are applicable to other Amtrak rail stations in Washington. Multimodal connectivity to these rail stations can enhance the passenger experience, may attract additional riders to intercity passenger rail, and increases the capacity for access to the stations without the need to increase the parking supply. This analysis focuses on alternatives to single-occupant vehicle (SOV) access and does not evaluate opportunities to increase the parking supply, manage parking demand, or make improvements to the roadway network for SOV access to intercity passenger rail. An analysis of existing conditions at these stations (summarized in the memorandum, 7.1.b Amtrak Cascades Rail Stations Existing Conditions Memo), served as the foundation for the connectivity analysis. Additionally, the results of an on-board survey of the travel behavior of Amtrak Cascades passengers provided insights to inform both the connectivity analysis and the candidate access improvements (summarized in the memorandum, 2.3.5 Final Amtrak Cascades Onboard OD Survey Memorandum). As used in this memorandum, “connectivity” refers to the collective influence of land use and transportation factors on the options for passengers to access or leave the rail stations. The connectivity analysis evaluates station area land use context, availability of transportation services, and station area transportation infrastructure to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing station access.
    [Show full text]
  • Febuary-March
    Washington Rail News February /march 2008 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not ---for-forforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." Storms scuttle Amtrak service Updates: Northwest Corridor infrastructure by Jim Long improvements and 2007 ridership numbers Extreme winter weather fell hard on the Pacific Northwest in early December, In a Jan. 22 meeting with Ken Uz- mission to rule on closing the Hickox Rd. bringing heavy rainfall and snowfall to Ore - nanski, Kevin Jeffers and Jeff Schultz of grade cr ossing, which has local opposi- gon and Washington. Beginning late on the WSDOT Rail and Marine office, All tion. If closure approval is given, the sid - Dec. 2, back -to-back storms gripped the re- Aboard Washington received an update ing will be extended to 9000 feet so pas - gion, causing fatalities and imperiling hun - on infrastructure improvements planned senger and freight trains can pass, re - dreds. Landslides and hig h water blocked and under construction in the Northwest ducing delays to the Cascades. Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks used Rail Corridor over the next several years. Stanwood siding and station: the sid- by Amtrak north and south of Seattle, These improvements directly support im- ing is being upgraded to make it more wreaking havoc on train service, mainly in proved Amtrak Cascades operations and usable but BNSF wants it extended be - Washington. (eventually) additional frequencies. Here fore allowing the new Stanwood station According to BNSF spokesman Gus are the highlights. to be built, a $16 mill. expense that is not Melonas, a land slide near Felida (between Customs Facility Siding in Blaine: budgeted at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • To the Honorable Lynn Peterson, Secretary Of
    S-4331.1 SENATE JOINT MEMORIAL 8023 State of Washington 64th Legislature 2016 Regular Session By Senators Hobbs, Bailey, and King Read first time 02/05/16. Referred to Committee on Transportation. 1 TO THE HONORABLE LYNN PETERSON, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, AND 2 TO THE WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, AND TO THE 3 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: 4 We, your Memorialists, the Senate and House of Representatives of 5 the State of Washington, in legislative session assembled, 6 respectfully represent and petition as follows: 7 WHEREAS, Former Washington state Senator Mary Margaret Haugen of 8 Island County rose from humble beginnings to a long and distinguished 9 career in public service, serving three terms as a member of the 10 Stanwood school board, ten years in the Washington State House of 11 Representatives from 1982 to 1992, and twenty years in the Washington 12 State Senate from 1993 to 2013; and 13 WHEREAS, During her thirty-year tenure as a legislator, she built 14 a reputation as one of the Steel Magnolias and for her considerable 15 skill at working across the aisle, fostering cooperation, and 16 championing progress over politics; and 17 WHEREAS, While in her capacity as chair of the Senate 18 Transportation Committee, steering billions of dollars across the 19 state to build roads, fix bridges, and operate ferries, she never 20 lost sight of the needs in her community; and 21 WHEREAS, She worked tirelessly to bring an Amtrak Cascades 22 passenger rail stop to Stanwood in Snohomish County; and p.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Equity Island Style
    Island Regional Transportation Planning Organization (IRTPO) Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan (CPT-HSTP) Transportation Equity Island Style Source: Maribeth Crandell, Island Transit January 23, 2018 Table of Contents 1 Island CPT-HSTP Contact Information 3 2 Plan Purpose 4 3 Region Map 5 4 Acronyms Used 6 5 Who Does This Plan Serve? 7 6 Coordination And Inclusion 12 7 Engagement 13 8 Demographics 21 9 Common Origins 29 10 Common Destinations 41 11 Existing Transportation Services 52 12 Unmet Transportation Needs 69 13 Technology-Based Solutions 83 14 Coordination With Emergency Management Agencies 85 15 Strategies to Meet Public Transportation Needs 89 16 Community Project Priorities 95 17 Ongoing Coordination 99 18 Potential Special Needs Transportation Projects 101 Page 2 of 104 Island CPT-HSTP Contact Information Island RTPO o Lead Agency: Island County o Lead Agency Staff: Island County Public Works o Mailing Address: PO Box 5000, Coupeville, WA 98239 o IRTPO Staff Contact: Brian Wood, Transportation Planner o Email [email protected] o Phone 360-678-7959 Needs Assessment Consultant: TranspoGroup o Project Lead, Patrick Lynch o Email: [email protected] o Phone: 425-821-3665 IRTPO Executive Board Member Organizations Island County City of Oak Harbor Town of Coupeville City of Langley Island County Public Transportation Benefit Area (Island Transit) Port of Coupeville Port of South Whidbey WSDOT, Mount Baker Area Naval Air Station Whidbey Page 3 of 104 Plan Purpose The CPT-HSTP is a planning tool to assist the IRTPO in identifying public transportation needs and creating improvement recommendations to benefit people with disabilities, seniors, young people, individuals with lower incomes, and others who depend on public transportation services.
    [Show full text]
  • Febuary-March
    Washington Rail News February /march 200 999 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not ---for-forforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." established with the relaunch of the Amtrak ridership bucks national trends with Builder in August 2005 and the public strong growth in 2008; Northwest train capacity continues to show its support by riding this train. strained even as new stops and improved stations It’s rather amazing that Coast Star- encourage continuing ridership increases light ridership increased in 2008, con - Nationwide, Amtrak ridership was 760,323, up 12.8% over sidering the route was partially or com - soared 11.1% in fiscal year 2008 2007; revenue was $20,999,003, pletely annulled between Jan. 20 and (ending Sept. 30) over 2007, setting a up 15.8%. Total Northwest Corri- May 6 because of the massive land - new all time record. This increase dor ridership (including Coast slide t hat wiped out the Union Pacific comes at the same time auto and air Starlight passengers riding solely mainline in the Oregon Cascades. The travel have plunged. And even the in the corridor) was 847,563, up Starlight received upgraded amenities substantial drop in gas prices since last 15.4% over 2007. and services this past summer and on- July has had little impact on the pub- • Empire Builder: FY 2008 time performance has improved mar - lic’s reductions in driving, though the ridership was 554,266, up 9.8% kedly from 2007. This improvement led over 2007; revenue was Amtrak to announce that effective Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2009 /January 2020201020 101010
    Washington Rail News December 2009 /January 2020201020 101010 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." Talgo’s Josh Coran speaks at All Aboard Northwest Senators question Pioneer Study Washington annual meeting By Dan McFarling, All Aboard Washington had its offi- Argentina, to name a few. Assoc. of Oregon Rail and Transit Advocates cial annual meeting on Nov. 14 at F.X. To maintain the company’s high According to Assoc. of Oregon Rail McRory’s Steak Chop and Oyster standards for reliability, Talgo now and Transit Advocates Pres. Donald House, just two blocks from King St. maintains or supervises maintenance Leap, Amtrak’s recently released draft Station. The 50 people gathered heard of all of its equipment around the world. Pioneer Route Study is flawed. In an from our featured speaker Josh Coran, In Seattle, Amtrak maintenance per- Oct. 1 letter to US Senator Ron Wyden Talgo’s manager of operations in the sonnel are supervised by Talgo man- (D-OR), Leap states the study “takes a U.S. Coran briefly covered the history agers. Having an on-board service very narrow view of how this route can of the Talgo design. The first versions technician on every trainset also en- be restored.” were light weight and low slung but did hanced reliability. The technician can The study underestimates ridership not have tilting capability to provide often fix a small problem before it be- levels and overstates costs of restoring passenger comfort when traveling come large problem that may result in passenger train service between Port- through curves at higher speeds.
    [Show full text]
  • New Stanwood Station
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ATK-09-091 November 16, 2009 Contact: Media Relations 510 238.4360 AMTRAK CASCADES TO MAKE NEW STOP AT STANWOOD, WASHINGTON STATION Twice daily service begins November 21 SEATTLE – For the first time in 38 years, passenger rail service is returning to the community of Stanwood/Camano Island with daily Amtrak Cascades train service making two morning and two evening stops at a new rail station beginning the morning of Saturday, November 21. “Amtrak is delighted to stop in Stanwood and provide residents with direct access to train travel and connections to our national network,” said Kurt Laird, Amtrak District Superintendent. “The opening of this new station could not come at a better time with the 2010 Olympics right around the corner,” said Paula Hammond, Washington Transportation Secretary. “Not only does the new stop give the community of Stanwood/Camano Island access to Amtrak Cascades intercity passenger rail service—which means more travel options to Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver, B.C.—but it provides Olympics-bound travelers an alternative way of getting to the games in Vancouver, B.C.,” she added. The $5 million station project was funded by the state of Washington, is located on the corner of 271st Street NW and the BNSF main line tracks in downtown Stanwood, and is expected to boost the Stanwood-area tourism industry and spur local economic development near the station. Great Northern Railroad operated passenger rail service to Stanwood until 1971. ATK-09-091 The new station is an unstaffed platform and will not have any ticketing capabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Historylink.Org Supplement for Washington: a State of Contrasts
    Photo of Gatewood School students on last day of school, Seattle, June 17, 1949. Courtesy Museum of History & Industry. HistoryLink.org Supplement for Washington: A State of Contrasts 1 Washington: A State of Contrasts has been identified as the most commonly used Washington state History textbook for 7th and 8th grades for the 2011-12 school year. Using this textbook as a base for identifying the specific themes and topics that are being covered in required Pacific Northwest History middle school classes, the Education Team at HistoryLink.org has created this supplement for teacher and students. This supplement was developed as a tool to assist in identifying HistoryLink.org essays that can be used to study and research the state history themes and topic in more depth. The name of each relevant essay is listed as well as the abstract, number, and link to the full essay. This supplement also aids HistoryLink.org in identifying general or specific topics for which more essays are needed or would be helpful in the Washington state History classroom. In addition, as a part of this exercise, HistoryLink.org staff assigned appropriate key words to selected essays to match those used in this textbook. A set of HistoryLink Elementary essays was added to the HistoryLink encyclopedia in 2014. (http://www.historylink.org/Index.cfm?DisplayPage=education/elementary- educators.cfm.) These essays were written for beginning readers who are studying Washington state history or anyone who wants to learn more about Washington. They may be helpful for some of your students. All HistoryLink Elementary essays are based on existing HistoryLink essays.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft 2019 Washington State Rail System Plan
    2019 Washington State RAIL SYSTEM PLAN DECEMBER 2019 WASH INGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 – PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT – DECEMBER 2019 1 Title VI Notice to Public 2 It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person 3 shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act 4 of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated 5 against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title 6 VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). 7 For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our 8 non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. 9 10 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information 11 This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity 12 at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard 13 of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. 14 15 Notificación de Titulo VI al Público 16 Es la política del Departamento de Transporte del Estado de Washington el asegurarse que ninguna 17 persona, por razones de raza, color, nación de origen o sexo, como es provisto en el Título VI del Acto 18 de Derechos Civiles de 1964, ser excluido de la participación en, ser negado los beneficios de, o ser 19 discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades financiado con fondos 20 federales.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN Prepared for the Skagit-Island Regional Transportation Planning Organization • November 2014
    Skagit-Island HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN Prepared for the Skagit-Island Regional Transportation Planning Organization • November 2014 Prepared by Transpo Group 11730 118th Avenue NE, Suite 600, Kirkland, WA 98034-7120 425.821.3665 | www.transpogroup.com Skagit-Island Human Services Transportation Plan | Transpo Group | 2 High Needs Areas ............................................................ 23 1. Introduction ...................................................... 4 Unmet Needs .................................................................. 24 2. Project Methodology ......................................... 5 6. Emergency Management ................................... 27 3. Existing Transportation Services ........................ 6 Skagit Transit ................................................................... 27 Public Transit Providers .................................................. 6 Island Transit ................................................................... 27 Human Services Transportation Providers ..................... 8 7. Technology ....................................................... 28 Long-Distance Transportation Providers ........................ 9 Skagit Transit ................................................................... 28 4. Public Engagement ............................................ 10 Island Transit ................................................................... 29 Skagit-Island Special Needs Transportation Committee . 10 8. Strategies and Activities ...................................
    [Show full text]