Cascades Corridor Station Design Criteria
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Oregon Passenger Rail Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact
Appendix C Public and Agency Comments and Responses April 2021 Contents Section Page Introduction ...................................................................................................................................C-1 Attachments Attachment C1 Comment and Response Matrix Attachment C2 Comments Received During Public Comment Period Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement C-i APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C C-ii Oregon Passenger Rail Project Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement APRIL 2021 APPENDIX C – INTRODUCTION Introduction The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) released the Tier 1 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Oregon Passenger Rail Project (Project) in October 2018. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register (FR) on October 19, 2018 (83 FR 53053). Stakeholders were encouraged to provide comments on the Tier 1 DEIS through various opportunities from October 18 through December 19, 2018. During the public comment period, ODOT and FRA received a total of 212 comments from members of the public and agency/organization representatives at five (5) public events, through the Project website, and by email and letter. This appendix includes two attachments: • Attachment 1: A matrix containing agency and public comments with responses from ODOT. The comments are organized in groups: agency, organization, and individual comments. • Attachment 2: The original comment submittals. Each comment has an index number which is reflected in the comment matrix and marked on the original comments. Tables C-1, C-2 and C-3 list the commenters along with the index number to find the comments with responses and the original format comments and in attachments 1 and 2, respectively. -
2016 Annual Report | 2017-2022 TDP
2016 Annual Report | 2017-2022 TDP Approved: August 16 2017 by Resolution 2017-06 Comment Period: 7/17/2017 – 8/16/2017 Public Hearing: 8/16/2017 at 1:00 PM at the Burlington City Hall Council Chambers, 833 S Spruce St, Burlington, WA 98233 Traducción: Disponible mediante solicitud. Email: [email protected] Teléfono: 360-757-5179 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Ron Wesen Jill Boudreau Skagit County Commissioner Mayor, Mount Vernon Keith Wagoner, Chair Kenneth Dahlstedt, Vice Chair Mayor, Sedro-Woolley Skagit County Commissioner Laurie Gere Lisa Janicki Mayor Anacortes Skagit County Commissioner Rick DeGloria Steve Sexton Burlington City Council Mayor, Burlington Ken Quam Marge Root, Mount Vernon City Council Labor Representative (non-voting member) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dale S. O’Brien MANAGERS Motoko Pleasant, Finance & Administration Troy Fair, Operations Chris Chidley, Information Technologies Allan Schaner, Maintenance & Facilities Skagit Transit TDP 2017-2022 3 Introduction Skagit Transit’s Six-Year Transit Development Plan (TDP) identifies how the agency will meet state and local long-range priorities for public transportation through capital improvements, operating changes, and other programs. It also addresses how such programs will be funded. The Plan conforms to the State’s transportation system policy goals (RCW 47.04.280) and supports local comprehensive planning and economic objectives within Skagit County. State transportation system policy goals are: Economic vitality. To promote and develop transportation systems that stimulate, support, and enhance the movement of people and goods to ensure a prosperous economy; Preservation. To maintain, preserve, and extend the life and utility of prior investments in transportation systems and services; Safety. To provide for and improve the safety and security of transportation customers and the transportation system; Mobility. -
Passenger Rail Needs Assessment
Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment draft report prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 31, 2014 www.camsys.com draft Oregon State Rail Plan Passenger Rail Needs Assessment prepared for Oregon Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Oakland, CA 94607 date March 31, 2014 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment Table of Contents 4.0 Passenger Rail Needs Assessment ................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Existing Intercity Passenger Rail Service................................................. 4-1 4.2 Existing Passenger Rail System Performance ....................................... 4-10 4.3 Cascades Corridor Physical and Operational Needs .......................... 4-18 4.4 Other Potential Corridors ........................................................................ 4-22 4.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 4-29 Cambridge Systematics, Inc. i 8053-084 Oregon State Rail Plan DRAFT Passenger Rail Needs Assessment List of Tables Table 4.1 Oregon Intercity Passenger Rail Stations .............................................. 4-2 Table 4.2 Intercity Passenger Rail Ridership to and from Oregon Stations as a Percent of Total Ridership, FY 2012 ............................................... 4-6 Table 4.3 Destinations of Amtrak Trips Originating at Oregon Stations as a Percent of -
CASCADES Train Time Schedule & Line Route
CASCADES train time schedule & line map CASCADES Eugene Station View In Website Mode The CASCADES train line (Eugene Station) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Eugene Station: 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM (2) King Street Station (Seattle): 5:30 AM - 4:40 PM (3) Union Station (Portland): 6:10 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest CASCADES train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next CASCADES train arriving. Direction: Eugene Station CASCADES train Time Schedule 12 stops Eugene Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Monday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM King Street Station South Weller Street Overpass, Seattle Tuesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tukwila Station Wednesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tacoma Station Thursday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 1001 Puyallup Avenue, Tacoma Friday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey) Saturday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 6600 Yelm Hwy Se, Thurston County Centralia Station 210 Railroad Avenue, Centralia CASCADES train Info Kelso Station Direction: Eugene Station 501 1st Avenue South, Kelso Stops: 12 Trip Duration: 380 min Vancouver Station Line Summary: King Street Station, Tukwila Station, 1301 West 11th Street, Vancouver Tacoma Station, Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey), Centralia Station, Kelso Station, Vancouver Station, Union Station (Portland) Union Station (Portland), Oregon City Station, Salem 800 Northwest 6th Avenue, Portland Staion, Albany Station, Eugene Station Oregon City Station 1757 Washington Street, Oregon City Salem Staion 500 13th St Se, Salem Albany Station -
WSK Commuter Rail Study
Oregon Department of Transportation – Rail Division Oregon Rail Study Appendix I Wilsonville to Salem Commuter Rail Assessment Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff Team Parsons Brinckerhoff Simpson Consulting Sorin Garber Consulting Group Tangent Services Wilbur Smith and Associates April 2010 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.......................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 3 WHAT IS COMMUTER RAIL? ................................................................................................... 3 GLOSSARY OF TERMS............................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA....................................................................................................................... 4 WES COMMUTER RAIL.......................................................................................................... 6 OTHER PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN THE CORRIDOR .................................................................. 6 OUTREACH WITH RAILROADS: PNWR AND BNSF .................................................................. 7 PORTLAND & WESTERN RAILROAD........................................................................................... 7 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY ..................................................................................................... 7 ROUTE CHARACTERISTICS.................................................................................................. -
Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan
Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan December 2018 Prepared for Skagit Council of Governments SCOG Skagit Council of Governments Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Skagit Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan December 2018 Prepared for SCOG Skagit Council of Governments Prepared by KFH Group, Inc. Seattle, WA | Bethesda, MD | Austin, TX Table of Contents Section 1 – Background and Overview of the Planning Process 1-1 Section 4 – Technology and Emergency Management Considerations 4-1 Introduction 1-1 Introduction 4-1 Background 1-1 ITS Technologies 4-1 Overview of the Planning Process 1-2 Collaboration with Emergency Management Agencies 4-1 Section 2 – Existing Transportation Services 2-1 Section 5 – Potential Strategies and Projects 5-1 Introduction 2-1 Introduction 5-1 Public Transit Systems 2-1 Strategies for Sustaining Existing Services 5-1 Tribes 2-4 Strategies for Expanding Existing Services 5-3 Human Service Agencies and Non-Profit Programs 2-5 Strategies for Creating New Services 5-3 Information, Referral, Rider Education, and Advocacy 2-7 Strategies for Enhancing Services 5-3 Schools 2-8 Strategies for Facilitating Access to Services 5-4 Ferry Services 2-9 Strategies for Coordinating Services, Support Functions, and 5-4 Planning Long Distance Bus and Rail Providers 2-9 Strategies for Promoting Environmental Sustainability 5-5 Medical Transportation Providers 2-10 Priorities for Implementation 5-5 Other Providers 2-11 Ongoing Coordination 5-5 Section 3 – Needs Assessment and Gap -
Island Transit Board of Directors
2019 ANNUAL REPORT AND TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020 – 2025 Page 2 of 50 2020 ISLAND TRANSIT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Jackie Henderson, Chair, Town of Coupeville Councilmember Janet St. Clair, Vice Chair, Island County Commissioner, District 3 Helen Price Johnson, Secretary, Island County Commissioner, District 1 Beth Munns, City of Oak Harbor Councilmember Craig Cyr, City of Langley Councilmember Lance Norton, Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1576 ISLAND TRANSIT STAFF Todd E. Morrow, Executive Director Robyn Goldring, Administrative & Human Resources Manager Paul Arand, Finance Manager Ken Riley, Maintenance Manager Shawn Harris, Operations Manager Meghan Heppner, Assistant to the Executive Director Island Transit complies with all federal requirements under Title VI, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin. If you have questions concerning this policy or practice, please contact Island Transit, 19758 SR 20, Coupeville, WA 98239, or contact the agency’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 678-7771 or [email protected]. This document can be made available in other accessible formats. Please contact Island Transit at (360) 678-7771 or email [email protected]. Island Transit Six Year Transit Development Plan 2020-2025 Page 3 of 50 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Section 1 – Organization and Funding 12 Section 2 – Facilities 14 Section 3 – Service Characteristics 14 Section 4 – Service Connections 18 Section 5 – Activities in 2019 19 Section 6 – Planning Goals 21 Section 7 – Planned Activities 2020 – 2025 24 Section 8 – Capital Improvement Program 2020 – 2025 29 Section 9 – Projected Operating Data 2020 – 2025 30 Section 10 – Projected Revenue and Expenditures 2020 – 2025 31 Appendix A – Transit Management System Plan – Asset Condition Data 33 Appendix B – System Maps 39 Appendix C – Performance Standards Policy 41 Appendix D – Public Outreach and Participation 48 Appendix E – Board Resolution No. -
June /July 2006
Washington Rail News June /July 2006 www.washarp.org [email protected] Publication of the Washington Association of Rail Passengers A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." King Street Station’s 100 th anniversary Amtrak President David th Hughes speaks to the NARP celebration wraps up July 1 with start of 4 David Hughes, acting president and Seattle-Portland Amtrak Cascades roundtrip CEO of Amtrak, told the NARP board of th directors that Amtrak is on the right track The 100 anniversary celebration of Pullman Railroad Company, Railway after former President Seattle’s historic King Street Station Express Agency, and Sound Transit. David Gunn brought kicked off on May 10. The ongoing One honoree was Amtrak station agent the company back celebration will wrap up on July 1 with a Marlene Koob, who has followed in the from the brink of full day of festivities. Events will include footsteps of her father and grandfather bankruptcy and near- the launch of the fourth daily roundtrip in working at the station. certain liquidation in between Seattle and Portland. More One aspect of the centennial cele- 2002. Key positive in- information on centennial events hap- bration is the collection of oral histories David Hughes dicators include: from people that have special memo- • Revenue per ries of the station. Though it’s too late passenger mile is up 10% so far in to participate in the live interview pro- 2006 over 2005. gram, you can still provide your • Amtrak has had consecutive years thoughts via the station centennial of ridership growth, going from website Click on the Share Your 21.7 mill. -
Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations
Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations Kory Kramer and David Schmitz University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS Geography 569 GIS Workshop August 23, 2013 2 Acknowledgments We would like to thank our project sponsor, Tim Parham, for the direction and guidance provided to us as we developed this project. He was quick to respond to tight deadlines and provided valuable feedback through early iterations of the TOD Walkshed Map. We would also like to thank Rebeccah Maskin and Stefan Coe of PSRC. Rebeccah’s thorough understanding of the land use data and its processing was invaluable in our efforts to arrive at defensible transit-supportive density numbers. Stefan provided the data necessary to get us started as well as the Python script used to create the 2012 slope-constrained walksheds. Dan Landes of Shelter Resources, Inc. provided valuable insight during the design considerations phase of the project, and important input after testing the penultimate version of the online TOD Walkshed Map. Contacts who provided transit data include Kit Na Davies and Jeff Anderson with Community Transit, Ruth Kinchen of Metro Transit, Erin Hunter and Teri Lapetino of Sound Transit, and Sabina Pope of Everett Transit. Thank you for going out of your way to figure out ways to send large datasets. Your help is greatly appreciated. We would like to recognize Ryan Curren and Elliott Barnett’s thoughtful comments on how the TOD Walkshed Map might be used by them and their colleagues. Thank you, Ryan and Elliott, for taking time out of your busy schedules to help us envision where our project will go after we hand it off. -
Skagit Transit Strategic Plan | 2018-2023 1
2018-2023 Strategic Plan September 2018 Table of Contents Section 1: Executive Summary……….……4 Section 2: Introduction………………….......6 Section 3: Current Conditions…………....10 Section 4: Community Involvement..........19 Overview……………………….......19 2018 Rider Survey Results.……....20 Public Participation Summary…....33 Six Key Priorities……….................33 Economic Vitality…………………..35 Section 5: Asset and Capital Planning…..38 Section 6: Demographic Overview……....42 Section 7: Fixed Route Service Plan…....48 Section 8: Conclusion………………….….53 Planning & Outreach Supervisor Brad Windler Planning Intern Nick Schmeck Skagit Transit Strategic Plan | 2018-2023 1 Traducción: Disponible mediante solicitud. Email: [email protected] Telephone: 360-757-5179 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dale S. O’Brien Skagit Transit Managerial Staff Motoko Pleasant, Finance & Administration Penny Roodzant, Human Resources Mark Kennedy, Operations Chris Chidley, Information Technologies Allan Schaner, Maintenance & Facilities Skagit Transit Strategic Plan | 2018-2023 2 A message from the Skagit Transit Executive Director, Skagit Transit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life in our county by excelling in the efficient and effective provision of safe, accessible, reliable, and attractive public transportation services by courteous and professional employees. This Strategic Plan will serve as a guide for the service improvements that we make in the next few years. These changes will: Enhance Safety- better routing will reduce the risk of accidents on a number of routes. Improve Rural Service- there are a number of service improvements (increased frequency, new routing, and more weekend service) for a number of rural areas. Improve Customer Service- we have listened to our riders and have targeted our efforts on what they requested in the 2018 rider survey. -
Section 5 Transportation Improvements & Programs Section 5: Transportation Improvements & Programs
Section 5 Transportation Improvements & Programs Section 5: Transportation Improvements & Programs The regional multimodal transportation system consists of state interstate highway provides access and connectivity to the population highways and ferry services, county roads and ferry services, city centers along the corridor. I-5 is classified as a Highway of Statewide streets, non-motorized transportation facilities, transit Significance (HSS) and is part of the National Highway System (NHS). facilities, airports, marine ports and railroads. This Defining Existing and I-5 is a multi-lane divided freeway with full access control. Within the section of Skagit 2040 summarizes the existing and Proposed “Regional metropolitan area, it serves the region with six interchanges, including Transportation System”: proposed regional transportation system, and regional its interchange with State Route (SR) 20. These six interchanges are transportation improvement projects. • State highways and ferry located within a distance of approximately seven miles. system; Regional Transportation Facilities • County ferry system; Outside of the Mount Vernon Urbanized Area (Urbanized Area) – The state highways form the core of the regional which includes Burlington, Mount Vernon, Sedro-Woolley and some • Principal arterials and other transportation system and most city and county arterials/collectors that surrounding areas – six additional interchanges along I-5 provide serve a “regional” function arterials provide some level of connection to the state access to the smaller communities, agricultural lands and recreation (i.e. serves as a regional highway system. The state highways connect the areas. The distance between interchanges along I-5 north and south of connection, serves a large region with other parts of Washington and facilitate the Urbanized Area is roughly one to five miles. -
Multimodal Connectivity Analysis and Candidate Improvements
WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 | APPENDIX C APPENDIX C: PASSENGER RAIL MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS AND CANDIDATE IMPROVEMENTS Overview This memorandum presents a multimodal connectivity analysis, identification of gaps in the multimodal network, and candidate access improvements for the fourteen passenger rail stations that are served by Amtrak Cascades in Portland, Oregon; Washington; and Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. Additionally, system-wide candidate improvements are identified that are applicable to other Amtrak rail stations in Washington. Multimodal connectivity to these rail stations can enhance the passenger experience, may attract additional riders to intercity passenger rail, and increases the capacity for access to the stations without the need to increase the parking supply. This analysis focuses on alternatives to single-occupant vehicle (SOV) access and does not evaluate opportunities to increase the parking supply, manage parking demand, or make improvements to the roadway network for SOV access to intercity passenger rail. An analysis of existing conditions at these stations (summarized in the memorandum, 7.1.b Amtrak Cascades Rail Stations Existing Conditions Memo), served as the foundation for the connectivity analysis. Additionally, the results of an on-board survey of the travel behavior of Amtrak Cascades passengers provided insights to inform both the connectivity analysis and the candidate access improvements (summarized in the memorandum, 2.3.5 Final Amtrak Cascades Onboard OD Survey Memorandum). As used in this memorandum, “connectivity” refers to the collective influence of land use and transportation factors on the options for passengers to access or leave the rail stations. The connectivity analysis evaluates station area land use context, availability of transportation services, and station area transportation infrastructure to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing station access.