DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft 2019 Washington State Rail System Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft 2019 Washington State Rail System Plan 2019 Washington State RAIL SYSTEM PLAN DECEMBER 2019 WASH INGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 – PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT – DECEMBER 2019 1 Title VI Notice to Public 2 It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person 3 shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act 4 of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated 5 against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title 6 VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). 7 For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our 8 non-discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7090. 9 10 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information 11 This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity 12 at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard 13 of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. 14 15 Notificación de Titulo VI al Público 16 Es la política del Departamento de Transporte del Estado de Washington el asegurarse que ninguna 17 persona, por razones de raza, color, nación de origen o sexo, como es provisto en el Título VI del Acto 18 de Derechos Civiles de 1964, ser excluido de la participación en, ser negado los beneficios de, o ser 19 discriminado de otra manera bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades financiado con fondos 20 federales. Cualquier persona quien crea que su protección bajo el Titulo VI ha sido violada, puede 21 presentar una queja con la Comisión Estadounidense Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo. Para 22 obtener información adicional sobre los procedimientos de queja bajo el Titulo VI y/o información sobre 23 nuestras obligaciones antidiscriminatorias, pueden contactar al coordinador del Título VI en la 24 Comisión Estadounidense de Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo 360-705-7090. 25 26 Información del Acta Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 27 Este material es disponible en un formato alternativo enviando un email/correo electrónico a la 28 Comisión Estadounidense de Igualdad de Oportunidades en el Empleo [email protected] o 29 llamando gratis al 855-362-4ADA (4232). Personas sordas o con discapacidad auditiva pueden solicitar 30 llamando Washington State Relay al 711. 1 WASH INGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 – PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT – DECEMBER 2019 31 Table of Contents 32 Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 33 1.1 Background and context ............................................................................................................... 6 34 1.2 Vision and goals for Washington’s rail system .............................................................................. 6 35 1.3 Transportation planning in Washington ........................................................................................ 8 36 1.4 Alignment with planning activities ................................................................................................. 9 37 1.5 Plan development ....................................................................................................................... 11 38 Chapter 2 Rail system overview ....................................................................................................... 13 39 2.1 Rail system elements ................................................................................................................. 13 40 2.2 Freight services .......................................................................................................................... 16 41 2.3 Passenger services .................................................................................................................... 19 42 2.4 Strategic Rail Corridor Network .................................................................................................. 21 43 2.5 Roles and responsibilities ........................................................................................................... 22 44 Chapter 3 Freight rail system strengths and challenges ................................................................ 25 45 3.1 Trends that may affect the freight rail system ............................................................................. 25 46 3.2 Existing and future demand for freight rail transportation ............................................................ 28 47 3.3 Class I railroads.......................................................................................................................... 35 48 3.4 Short line railroads ..................................................................................................................... 36 49 Chapter 4 Passenger rail system strengths and challenges .......................................................... 40 50 4.1 Trends that may affect passenger rail demand ........................................................................... 40 51 4.2 Long distance ............................................................................................................................. 41 52 4.3 Intercity ...................................................................................................................................... 44 53 4.4 Commuter .................................................................................................................................. 54 54 Chapter 5 Integrated rail system....................................................................................................... 58 55 5.1 Rail system capacity ................................................................................................................... 58 56 5.2 Multimodal connectivity for freight rail ......................................................................................... 65 57 5.3 Multimodal connectivity for passenger rail .................................................................................. 68 58 5.4 The rail system in communities .................................................................................................. 72 59 Chapter 6 Rail system strategies ...................................................................................................... 80 60 6.1 Freight rail strategies .................................................................................................................. 80 61 6.2 Passenger rail strategies ............................................................................................................ 83 62 6.3 Integrated rail system strategies ................................................................................................. 86 63 Chapter 7 Rail investments and initiatives ...................................................................................... 92 2 WASH INGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 – PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT – DECEMBER 2019 64 7.1 Freight rail .................................................................................................................................. 92 65 7.2 Passenger rail ............................................................................................................................ 96 66 7.3 Integrated rail system ................................................................................................................. 99 67 Chapter 8 Rail funding sources ...................................................................................................... 105 68 8.1 Federal ..................................................................................................................................... 105 69 8.2 State ......................................................................................................................................... 108 70 Chapter 9 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 111 71 Appendix A: Illustrative list of investments ................................................................................... 112 72 Appendix B: Existing and future demand forecasting results of intercity passenger rail and 73 freight rail transportation ................................................................................................................ 131 74 Appendix C: Passenger rail multimodal connectivity analysis and candidate improvements .. 157 75 Appendix D: Federal requirements for state rail plans ................................................................. 304 76 77 3 WASH INGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 – PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT – DECEMBER 2019 78 Table of Exhibits 79 Exhibit 1-1 Transportation planning integration ........................................................................................... 9 80 Exhibit 2-1 Washington state rail system by owner .................................................................................... 14 81 Exhibit 2-2 Primary rail corridors used for passenger rail services in Washington state ............................ 15 82 Exhibit 2-3 Short line railroad operators in Washington state .................................................................... 17 83 Exhibit
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study
    Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study Final Report February 2014 (this page left blank intentionally) Initial Segment and Airport Link Before and After Study – Final Report (Feb 2014) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Before and After Study Requirement and Purposes ................................................................................................... 1 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Milestones .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Collection in the Fall .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................................ 2 History of Project Planning and Development ....................................................................................................... 2 Characteristic 1 - Project Scope .............................................................................................................................. 6 Characteristic
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Transit 4
    1 of 16 Funding Application Competition Regional FTA Application Type Main Competition Status submitted Submitted: April 27th, 2020 4:27 PM Prepopulated with screening form? No Project Information 1. Project Title South Tacoma & Lakewood Station Access Improvements 2. Regional Transportation Plan ID 4086, 4085 3. Sponsoring Agency Sound Transit 4. Cosponsors N/A 5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from WSDOT? N/A 6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor? N/A 7. Is your agency a designated recipient for FTA funds? Yes 8. Designated recipient concurrence N/A Contact Information 1. Contact name Tyler Benson 2. Contact phone 206-903-7372 3. Contact email [email protected] Project Description 1. Project Scope This Project will complete preliminary engineering and NEPA environmental review for station access improvements at the South Tacoma and Lakewood Sounder stations. These improvements will include, but not limited to, sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle improvements, lighting and other station area enhancements to improve safety and accessibility for transit riders and the community. The work will also include analyzing transit use around the stations to inform integration of multi-modal improvements and evaluation of parking improvement options at the stations. The scope also includes the development and implementation of an external engagement strategy, including public engagement activities for targeted outreach to underserved communities in the project area. Sound Transit and the cities of Lakewood and Tacoma will identify the infrastructure needs in and around each station that are most critical to removing barriers, improving safety, promoting TOD and improving access to station-area communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Operation Lifesaver Executive Committee Meeting
    Freighthouse Square – Dome District Development Group DRAFT Meeting Summary Date: December 9, 2013 Time: 4:30 p.m. to approximately 6:00 p.m. Location: Freighthouse Square (FHS), West End Present: City of Tacoma: Ian Munce, Robert Thoms, Don Erickson WSDOT Rail Office: David Smelser, Carol Lee Roalkvam, Jason Biggs, Frank Davidson Sound Transit: Eric Beckman Freighthouse Square Owner: Bryan Borgelt VIA Architects: Mahlon Clements, Trey West Dome District Development Group: Janice McNeil, Jori Adkins, Rick Semple New Tacoma Neighborhood Council: Elizabeth Burris AIA SWW: Ko Wibow, Aaron Winston Coalition for Active Transportation: (?) Tacoma News Tribune: Peter Callahan, Kate Martin Others (3) ______________________________________________________________________________ The following is a draft summary of this meeting. Please send any suggested revisions or clarifications to Frank Davidson at [email protected] 1. Introductions • Ian Munce called the group to order. • Janice McNeil, President of the Dome District Development Group, introduced herself and asked that everyone introduce themselves. 2. Project Overview and FRA Review • David Smelser thanked the group for gathering for an update on the Tacoma Station Relocation portion of the Point Defiance Bypass project and recent developments with the station. He gave a brief overview of the Point Defiance Bypass project, which is one of multiple projects funded through a grant administered by the Federal Rail Administration (FRA). • Ian Munce asked David to start with a status of discussions on the platform between C and D Streets for Freighthouse Square (FHS) and parking, as he said this was the impetus for convening the Dome District Advisory Group in the first place. o David reviewed the original concept as presented in the Environmental Assessment (EA) and the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI).
    [Show full text]
  • CASCADES Train Time Schedule & Line Route
    CASCADES train time schedule & line map CASCADES Eugene Station View In Website Mode The CASCADES train line (Eugene Station) has 3 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Eugene Station: 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM (2) King Street Station (Seattle): 5:30 AM - 4:40 PM (3) Union Station (Portland): 6:10 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest CASCADES train station near you and ƒnd out when is the next CASCADES train arriving. Direction: Eugene Station CASCADES train Time Schedule 12 stops Eugene Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Monday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM King Street Station South Weller Street Overpass, Seattle Tuesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tukwila Station Wednesday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Tacoma Station Thursday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 1001 Puyallup Avenue, Tacoma Friday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey) Saturday 7:25 AM - 2:20 PM 6600 Yelm Hwy Se, Thurston County Centralia Station 210 Railroad Avenue, Centralia CASCADES train Info Kelso Station Direction: Eugene Station 501 1st Avenue South, Kelso Stops: 12 Trip Duration: 380 min Vancouver Station Line Summary: King Street Station, Tukwila Station, 1301 West 11th Street, Vancouver Tacoma Station, Centennial Station (Olympia-Lacey), Centralia Station, Kelso Station, Vancouver Station, Union Station (Portland) Union Station (Portland), Oregon City Station, Salem 800 Northwest 6th Avenue, Portland Staion, Albany Station, Eugene Station Oregon City Station 1757 Washington Street, Oregon City Salem Staion 500 13th St Se, Salem Albany Station
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Financial Plan & Proposed Budget
    2021 Financial Plan & Proposed Budget October 2020 To request accommodations for persons with disabilities or to receive information in alternative formats, please call 1-888-889-6368, TTY Relay 711 or e-mail [email protected] October 2020 CHAIR Kent Keel To: Sound Transit Board of Directors University Place Councilmember From: Peter M. Rogoff, Chief Executive Officer Subject: Proposed Budget for Calendar Year 2021 VICE CHAIRS Dow Constantine None of us began 2020 expecting a pandemic and a recession. This has been King County Executive a year like none other, and we are all humbled by what has taken place and Paul Roberts Everett Councilmember the uncertainty that lies ahead. Nonetheless, with the Board’s guidance we are taking these new realities head-on to ensure that Sound Transit remains a healthy, resilient agency that delivers for the public now and into the BOARD MEMBERS future. Nancy Backus Auburn Mayor At the beginning of the year, we thought our greatest challenge would be David Baker Connect 2020. Through 11 weeks of construction, we created Link’s first Kenmore Mayor branch line, forging the connections from International District/Chinatown Claudia Balducci Station to the Eastside, while keeping all stations open. Our talented and King County Council Chair dedicated staff exemplified our core value of passenger focus, and each Bruce Dammeier Sound Transit staff member at every level of the organization served as an Pierce County Executive Ambassador to assist our riders with navigating the service disruption. Jenny Durkan Seattle Mayor In the early weeks of March as Connect 2020 construction was winding Debora Juarez down, the threat of COVID-19 was rapidly becoming apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • Train Sim World 2 Southeastern High Speed Driver's Manual EN.Pdf
    EN SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED ©2021 Dovetail Games, a trading name of RailSimulator.com Limited (“DTG”). "Dovetail Games", “Train Sim World” and “SimuGraph” are trademarks or registered trademarks of DTG. Unreal® Engine, ©1998-2021, Epic Games, Inc. All rights reserved. Unreal® is a registered trademark of Epic Games. Portions of this software utilise SpeedTree® technology (©2014 Interactive Data Visualization, Inc.). SpeedTree® is a registered trademark of Interactive Data Visualization, Inc. All rights reserved. Southeastern is the registered trade mark of The Go-Ahead Group PLC. Permission to use the Double Arrow Trade Mark is granted by the Secretary of State for Transport. All other copyrights or trademarks are the property of their respective owners and are used here with permission. Unauthorised copying, adaptation, rental, re-sale, arcade use, charging for use, broadcast, cable transmission, public performance, distribution or extraction of the product or any trademark or copyright work that forms part of this product is prohibited. Developed and published by DTG. CONTENTS 1 SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED OVERVIEW 5 TRAIN SAFETY & IN-CAB SIGNALLING SYSTEMS 5 INTRODUCING SOUTHEASTERN HIGH SPEED 43 AUTOMATIC WARNING SYSTEM (AWS) 6 ROUTE MAP & POINTS OF INTEREST 44 TRAIN PROTECTION & WARNING SYSTEM (TPWS) 7 GAME MODES 45 KVB 2 THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 47 TVM-430 8 INTRODUCING THE BR CLASS 395 'JAVELIN' 6 BRITISH RAILWAY SIGNALLING 9 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: FRONT 50 COLOUR LIGHT 10 BR CLASS 395 DRIVING CAB: REAR 56 SEMAPHORE 11 BR CLASS
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the Group PDF 603KB
    2 Universal Registration Document 2020 / UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD Presentation of the Group Presentation of the Group 1.1 KEY FACTS 3 1.2 HISTORY 4 1.3 STRATEGY AND BUSINESS MODEL 6 1.4 BUSINESS OVERVIEW 12 Business segments 12 Portfolio breakdown 13 Development pipeline 15 CHAPTER 1.5 PORTFOLIO 16 1.5.1 France: Shopping Centres 16 1.5.2 France: Convention & Exhibition 18 1.5.3 France: Offices 19 1.5.4 Central Europe: Shopping Centres 20 1.5.5 Central Europe: Offices 21 1.5.6 Spain: Shopping Centres 21 1.5.7 Spain: Offices 21 1.5.8 Nordics: Shopping Centres 22 1.5.9 Nordics: Offices 22 1.5.10 Austria: Shopping Centres 23 1.5.11 Austria: Offices 23 1.5.12 Germany: Shopping Centres 24 1.5.13 Germany: Offices 24 1.5.14 The Netherlands: Shopping Centres 25 1.5.15 The Netherlands: Offices 25 1.5.16 United States: Shopping Centres 26 1.5.17 United States: Offices 28 1.5.18 United Kingdom: Shopping Centres 29 1.5.19 United Kingdom: Offices 29 1.6 OVERVIEW OF VALUATION REPORTS PREPARED BY UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD’S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL APPRAISERS FOR EUROPEAN ASSETS 30 1.7 OVERVIEW OF VALUATION REPORTS PREPARED BY UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD’S INDEPENDENT EXTERNAL APPRAISERS FOR AMERICAN ASSETS 32 1.8 STRUCTURE 34 1.9 SIMPLIFIED GROUP ORGANISATIONAL CHART 35 Universal Registration Document 2020 / UNIBAIL-RODAMCO-WESTFIELD 3 Presentation of the Group Key facts 1.1 KEY FACTS 1. 87 16 OFFICES & OTHERS SHOPPING CENTRES BUILDINGS(1) 10 80% CONVENTION & EXHIBITION COLLECTION RATE(3) VENUES(2) 247 ~3,100 COVID-19 ESG INITIATIVES EMPLOYEES €1,790 Mn €7.28 ADJUSTED RECURRING NET RENTAL INCOME EARNINGS PER SHARE €2.3 Bn €56.3 Bn DISPOSALS(4) GROSS MARKET VALUE €166.8 €4.4 Bn EPRA NET REINSTATEMENT PIPELINE VALUE PER SHARE (1) Only standalone offices > 10,000 sqm and offices affixed to a shopping centre > 15,000 sqm, including La Vaguada offices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treachery of Strategic Decisions
    The treachery of strategic decisions. An Actor-Network Theory perspective on the strategic decisions that produce new trains in the UK. Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael John King. May 2021 Abstract The production of new passenger trains can be characterised as a strategic decision, followed by a manufacturing stage. Typically, competing proposals are developed and refined, often over several years, until one emerges as the winner. The winning proposition will be manufactured and delivered into service some years later to carry passengers for 30 years or more. However, there is a problem: evidence shows UK passenger trains getting heavier over time. Heavy trains increase fuel consumption and emissions, increase track damage and maintenance costs, and these impacts could last for the train’s life and beyond. To address global challenges, like climate change, strategic decisions that produce outcomes like this need to be understood and improved. To understand this phenomenon, I apply Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to Strategic Decision-Making. Using ANT, sometimes described as the sociology of translation, I theorise that different propositions of trains are articulated until one, typically, is selected as the winner to be translated and become a realised train. In this translation process I focus upon the development and articulation of propositions up to the point where a winner is selected. I propose that this occurs within a valuable ‘place’ that I describe as a ‘decision-laboratory’ – a site of active development where various actors can interact, experiment, model, measure, and speculate about the desired new trains.
    [Show full text]
  • June /July 2006
    Washington Rail News June /July 2006 www.washarp.org [email protected] Publication of the Washington Association of Rail Passengers A NotNot----forforforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." King Street Station’s 100 th anniversary Amtrak President David th Hughes speaks to the NARP celebration wraps up July 1 with start of 4 David Hughes, acting president and Seattle-Portland Amtrak Cascades roundtrip CEO of Amtrak, told the NARP board of th directors that Amtrak is on the right track The 100 anniversary celebration of Pullman Railroad Company, Railway after former President Seattle’s historic King Street Station Express Agency, and Sound Transit. David Gunn brought kicked off on May 10. The ongoing One honoree was Amtrak station agent the company back celebration will wrap up on July 1 with a Marlene Koob, who has followed in the from the brink of full day of festivities. Events will include footsteps of her father and grandfather bankruptcy and near- the launch of the fourth daily roundtrip in working at the station. certain liquidation in between Seattle and Portland. More One aspect of the centennial cele- 2002. Key positive in- information on centennial events hap- bration is the collection of oral histories David Hughes dicators include: from people that have special memo- • Revenue per ries of the station. Though it’s too late passenger mile is up 10% so far in to participate in the live interview pro- 2006 over 2005. gram, you can still provide your • Amtrak has had consecutive years thoughts via the station centennial of ridership growth, going from website Click on the Share Your 21.7 mill.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations
    Transit-Oriented Development Map for Low Income Housing Tax Credit Allocations Kory Kramer and David Schmitz University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS Geography 569 GIS Workshop August 23, 2013 2 Acknowledgments We would like to thank our project sponsor, Tim Parham, for the direction and guidance provided to us as we developed this project. He was quick to respond to tight deadlines and provided valuable feedback through early iterations of the TOD Walkshed Map. We would also like to thank Rebeccah Maskin and Stefan Coe of PSRC. Rebeccah’s thorough understanding of the land use data and its processing was invaluable in our efforts to arrive at defensible transit-supportive density numbers. Stefan provided the data necessary to get us started as well as the Python script used to create the 2012 slope-constrained walksheds. Dan Landes of Shelter Resources, Inc. provided valuable insight during the design considerations phase of the project, and important input after testing the penultimate version of the online TOD Walkshed Map. Contacts who provided transit data include Kit Na Davies and Jeff Anderson with Community Transit, Ruth Kinchen of Metro Transit, Erin Hunter and Teri Lapetino of Sound Transit, and Sabina Pope of Everett Transit. Thank you for going out of your way to figure out ways to send large datasets. Your help is greatly appreciated. We would like to recognize Ryan Curren and Elliott Barnett’s thoughtful comments on how the TOD Walkshed Map might be used by them and their colleagues. Thank you, Ryan and Elliott, for taking time out of your busy schedules to help us envision where our project will go after we hand it off.
    [Show full text]
  • Multimodal Connectivity Analysis and Candidate Improvements
    WASHINGTON STATE RAIL PLAN 2019- 2040 | APPENDIX C APPENDIX C: PASSENGER RAIL MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY ANALYSIS AND CANDIDATE IMPROVEMENTS Overview This memorandum presents a multimodal connectivity analysis, identification of gaps in the multimodal network, and candidate access improvements for the fourteen passenger rail stations that are served by Amtrak Cascades in Portland, Oregon; Washington; and Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. Additionally, system-wide candidate improvements are identified that are applicable to other Amtrak rail stations in Washington. Multimodal connectivity to these rail stations can enhance the passenger experience, may attract additional riders to intercity passenger rail, and increases the capacity for access to the stations without the need to increase the parking supply. This analysis focuses on alternatives to single-occupant vehicle (SOV) access and does not evaluate opportunities to increase the parking supply, manage parking demand, or make improvements to the roadway network for SOV access to intercity passenger rail. An analysis of existing conditions at these stations (summarized in the memorandum, 7.1.b Amtrak Cascades Rail Stations Existing Conditions Memo), served as the foundation for the connectivity analysis. Additionally, the results of an on-board survey of the travel behavior of Amtrak Cascades passengers provided insights to inform both the connectivity analysis and the candidate access improvements (summarized in the memorandum, 2.3.5 Final Amtrak Cascades Onboard OD Survey Memorandum). As used in this memorandum, “connectivity” refers to the collective influence of land use and transportation factors on the options for passengers to access or leave the rail stations. The connectivity analysis evaluates station area land use context, availability of transportation services, and station area transportation infrastructure to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing station access.
    [Show full text]
  • Febuary-March
    Washington Rail News February /march 2008 www.AllAboardWashington.org Publication of All Aboard Washington A Not ---for-forforfor----profitprofit Consumer Organization “Moving forward...On Rail ."."." Storms scuttle Amtrak service Updates: Northwest Corridor infrastructure by Jim Long improvements and 2007 ridership numbers Extreme winter weather fell hard on the Pacific Northwest in early December, In a Jan. 22 meeting with Ken Uz- mission to rule on closing the Hickox Rd. bringing heavy rainfall and snowfall to Ore - nanski, Kevin Jeffers and Jeff Schultz of grade cr ossing, which has local opposi- gon and Washington. Beginning late on the WSDOT Rail and Marine office, All tion. If closure approval is given, the sid - Dec. 2, back -to-back storms gripped the re- Aboard Washington received an update ing will be extended to 9000 feet so pas - gion, causing fatalities and imperiling hun - on infrastructure improvements planned senger and freight trains can pass, re - dreds. Landslides and hig h water blocked and under construction in the Northwest ducing delays to the Cascades. Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks used Rail Corridor over the next several years. Stanwood siding and station: the sid- by Amtrak north and south of Seattle, These improvements directly support im- ing is being upgraded to make it more wreaking havoc on train service, mainly in proved Amtrak Cascades operations and usable but BNSF wants it extended be - Washington. (eventually) additional frequencies. Here fore allowing the new Stanwood station According to BNSF spokesman Gus are the highlights. to be built, a $16 mill. expense that is not Melonas, a land slide near Felida (between Customs Facility Siding in Blaine: budgeted at this time.
    [Show full text]