Brooks Autobiograhy.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Brooks Autobiograhy.Pdf 28 Sep 2001 9:51 AR AR143-02.tex AR143-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR 28 28 Sep 2001 9:51 AR AR143-02.tex AR143-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 2001. 26:29–48 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved AUTONOMOUS SCIENCE AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE SCIENCE: A Search for Resolution Harvey Brooks Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138; e-mail: [email protected] Key Words nuclear energy, reactor safeguards, energy and environment, technology assessment, science, and public policy ■ Abstract I reflect on a career that has featured developing an advanced torpedo for submarine warfare during World War II, designing alternative nuclear reactors at the advent of nuclear power, guiding the development of the first institutions for technology assessment, assisting several of the early efforts at environmental policy analysis, and promoting experiments that have led to insights regarding the humanization of work. A recurring concern of mine, still unresolved, is how to give due weight, simultaneously, to two different visions of the scientific enterprise: an endeavor that must remain autonomous and an endeavor that must be driven by societal needs. CONTENTS FAMILY BACKGROUND AND EARLY EDUCATION ...................... 30 GRADUATE EDUCATION AND WORLD WAR II .......................... 30 POSTWAR AND GENERAL ELECTRIC—EARLY INVOLVEMENT WITH NUCLEAR POWER ............................. 32 HARVARD .......................................................... 35 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS ................... 35 THE PRESIDENT’S SCIENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ................... 36 COMBINING NATURAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES ........................ 38 INTERNATIONAL VENTURES: OECD, GERMAN MARSHALL FUND, IIASA, ICIPE, AND VITA ........................... 42 COMMISSION ON SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS ........................ 44 CONAES ............................................................ 44 1980–1990: R&D AND INTERNATIONAL COMPETITION .................. 45 THE HARMAN PROGRAM ON TECHNOLOGY, PUBLIC POLICY, AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT ........................ 46 REFLECTIONS ....................................................... 47 1056-3466/01/1022-0029$14.00 29 28 Sep 2001 9:51 AR AR143-02.tex AR143-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR 30 BROOKS FAMILY BACKGROUND AND EARLY EDUCATION I was born and brought up in Cleveland, Ohio, the oldest child in a relatively well-off household. Both of my parents were from old Cleveland families, going back several generations. My grandfather on my mother’s side was the owner of a shipping line, the Harvey H. Brown Company, which carried iron ore from Duluth, Minnesota, on Lake Superior to various Lake Erie ports on its way to the midwest iron and steel cities. I have vivid memories from my early boyhood of taking several summertime family expeditions from Painesville, Ohio, east of Cleveland, through the locks at Sioux St. Marie, to Duluth, and back in rather plush family quarters on one of my grandfather’s boats. My grandfather on my father’s side was a partner in a luxury furniture busi- ness, and my father a mechanical engineer who, after graduation from Yale, took a masters degree in mechanical engineering at Case Institute of Technology in Cleveland. After finishing his degree, he joined the National Malleable and Steel Castings Company, a small specialty steel company in Cleveland, which mostly made equipment for the railroad industry. I was educated in a newly launched private school, the Hawken School, in about the fourth class to enter after it started. The classes were small and the education was classical, with lots of personal attention from very good teachers, some of whom later went on to become well-known scholars. I remember that my first grade class was very small and that I had the incorrigible habit of constantly raising my hand with the correct answer ready should any child falter in his or her recitation. I then went to The Hill School, a boys’ private boarding school in Pottstown, Pennsylvania, and from there I went to Yale, in the Class of 1937. I skipped the seventh grade at Hawken but took a postgraduate year at The Hill School before going to college. As a boy I was quite bookish. From an early age I read semipopular books on philosophy and science—Eddington, Bertrand Russell, Alfred Whitehead, Einstein—and I was always at the top of my class. At about the age of 12, I became fascinated with theoretical physics and from that time on thought I would be a physicist. As my father and most of the males in my mother’s extended family had gone to Yale, it was regarded as natural that I would follow in their foot- steps, which I did. At Yale I majored in mathematics but took all the physics I could, including the advanced course in theoretical physics given by Leigh Paige, which was mainly for graduate students and which solidified my interest in a physics career. GRADUATE EDUCATION AND WORLD WAR II At the end of my senior year at Yale, I was awarded a Henry Fellowship to attend Oxford or Cambridge, which included enough money for travel in Europe. I spent the year 1937–1938 in Cambridge, affiliated with Clare College, taking theoretical 28 Sep 2001 9:51 AR AR143-02.tex AR143-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR AUTONOMOUS SCIENCE 31 physics courses at the Cavendish Laboratories. It was a very exciting time to be in physics at Cambridge, and I reveled in lectures from Dirac, Rutherford, Fowler, and many others. I still have the notebooks I kept. There was not much personal contact, however. My tutor at Clare was H.M. Taylor, who had numerous college administrative duties and whom, as a result, I saw relatively infrequently. The most outstanding lecturer was Dirac, whose lectures were very polished. However, I think I got the most out of Fowler’s course in statistical mechanics, based on his monumental book. The class was often disorganized. He would start a derivation on the blackboard and then get fouled up. But by the time he had straightened it out, with frequent assistance from his listeners, I felt I had mastered the material. It was almost as though he had done it intentionally as a teaching device, though I doubt that was the case. At the end of my year in Cambridge I did a good deal of soul searching about whether to stay on for two more years to get a degree, because by that time war clouds were gathering and the future of graduate study looked very uncertain. At the same time, one of the physics books I had been reading on my own with partic- ular interest and attention was J.H. Van Vleck’s Theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities. I decided that I might want to go to Harvard and work with Van Vleck, whose work particularly intrigued me. This I ultimately did, finishing a Ph.D. with “Van” in 1940. At that time I was elected to the Society of Fellows at Harvard, which assured me of at least three years of support and even the possibil- ity of a second three-year term if things worked out. It was very stimulating being among a group of scholars from many different disciplines. We met together at weekly dinners with the Senior Fellows, such as Alfred North Whitehead, Crane Brinton, L.J. Henderson, and Arthur Darby Nock, with exciting cross-disciplinary discussions on every conceivable subject. One by-product of this was the kindling of an interest in geophysics that resulted in a collaboration with David Griggs, a second-term Junior Fellow, in a theory of convection in the earth’s mantle as a component in the explanation of what later became known as the theory of plate tectonics. Because of the war in Europe and the general opinion that the United States was almost certain to get involved eventually, my experience in the Society of Fellows was short-lived. The National Defense Research Committee had been formed, and I soon began consulting with the secret Harvard Underwater Sound Labora- tory (HUSL) under the direction of Professor F.V. Hunt, Professor of Acoustics, in the basement of the Cruft Laboratory. This had been organized under a con- tract with the US government to be devoted to antisubmarine warfare. When the United States entered the war after Pearl Harbor in 1941, I took a leave of ab- sence from the Society of Fellows to join HUSL as a full-time employee, where I remained employed until VJ day. My main job at HUSL, for most of the war, was as associate head (and essentially field director) for a group developing an acoustic homing torpedo known as Fido. It was designed to be launched from an antisubmarine (ASW) aircraft and to circle at a fixed depth until it detected the noise emitted by an enemy submarine. The torpedo would then steer toward 28 Sep 2001 9:51 AR AR143-02.tex AR143-02.SGM ARv2(2001/05/10) P1: GSR 32 BROOKS the noise source in both azimuth and depth until it came into actual physical contact with the target, at which point it was supposed to explode and fatally cripple the target. This weapon was engineered for manufacture by Bell Labo- ratories and put into production by Western Electric, the manufacturing arm of American Telephone & Telegraph (AT&T). I am told it was quite effective during the closing months of the war in Europe, mostly in the Bay of Biscay off the coast of Spain and France. Operationally it became known as the Mark 24 mine. The development and testing of experimental models of Fido was conducted first from small boats off the coast near Boston, and then, when the weather got too rough and cold, at a new field station in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. For most of one winter, I commuted weekly between Boston and Miami in Eastern Airlines’ DC3s, carrying secret electronic equipment in my lap because security regulations forbade my checking it with my luggage or even letting it out of my sight in the cabin luggage bin.
Recommended publications
  • Jerome Wiesner Was a Creative Force at MIT for the Last Half Century
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES JEROME BERT WIESNER 1915–1994 A Biographical Memoir by LOUIS D. SMULLIN Biographical Memoirs, VOLUME 78 PUBLISHED 2000 BY THE NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. Copyright by Karsh, Ottawa JEROME BERT WIESNER May 30, 1915–October 21, 1994 BY LOUIS D. SMULLIN EROME WIESNER—JERRY to almost everybody—led an excit- J ing and productive life and, more than most, he made a difference. His career, the offices he held and the honors he received are spelled out in the MIT obituary notice at the time of his death. As interesting and impressive as is the list of offices and honors, even more interesting is his transformation from a young engineer just out of college to an “electronic warrior” during World War II, to a “cold warrior” during the early days of the “missile gap,” and finally to a leading spokesman for the nuclear test ban and a worker for nuclear disarmament. Jerry and his younger sister, Edna, were the children of Joseph and Ida Wiesner, each of whom had come to the United States at about the turn of the century. To escape having to take violin lessons, at age nineteen, Joseph had run away from his parents in Vienna in about 1892 and had shipped out to places as far away as Alaska and the California gold fields before landing in New York. (Edna remembers her father telling stories about meeting and drinking with Jack London in Alaska.) Ida had come from Romania to New York with her younger sister. She worked in the gar- ment industry and then as a housekeeper until she and 3 4 BIOGRAPHICAL MEMOIRS Joseph met and married in 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Thephysiologist
    Published by the American Physiological Society – Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism THEPHYSIOLOGIST March 2016 • Vol. 59/No. 2 89th President of APS Jane F. Reckelhoff A Matter of Opinion I am very honored and humbled to have Warning: Watch been chosen by the members of the American Out for Predatory Physiological Society to represent them as the 89th President beginning in April 2016. I would Publishers like to thank the membership for their support. I would also like to thank the mentors I have had Because of the publication schedule for along the way who have shaped my career as a The Physiologist, I am writing this piece physiologist. I have been a member of APS for the shortly after the New Year! Hopefully, past 25 years, and the Society has not only shaped each of you had an opportunity to relax, Jane F. Reckelhoff my scientific career but given me opportunities to enjoy family and friends, and, most be of service to fellow physiologists by allowing importantly, begin considering how to me to serve on various APS committees. I consider take advantage of the 6.6% increase in the role of President as another opportunity to serve the Society and am the NIH budget. While I too am looking excited to begin the task. forward to 2016, I was also pleasantly surprised to discover that even predatory As I read the editorials by my predecessors, I believe the Society faces Open Access (OA) publishers took some old challenges and also some new ones. I just listened to Ben time off over the Holidays.
    [Show full text]
  • Feature Multiple Means to an End: a Reexamination of President Kennedy’S Decision to Go to the Moon by Stephen J
    Feature Multiple Means to an End: A Reexamination of President Kennedy’s Decision to Go to the Moon By Stephen J. Garber On May 25, 1961, in his famously special “Urgent National Needs” speech to a joint session of Congress, President John E Kennedy made a dramatic call to send Americans to the Moon “before this decade is out.”’ After this resulted in the highly successful and publicized ApoZZo Program that indeed safely flew humans to the Moon from 1969-1972, historians and space aficio- nados have looked back at Kennedy’s decision in varying ways. Since 1970,2 most social scientists have believed that Kennedy made a single, rational, pragmatic choice to com- CHAT WITH THE AUTHOR pete with the Soviet Union in the arena of space exploration Please join us in a “chat session” with the au- as a way to achieve world prestige during the height of the thor of this article, Stephen J. Garber. In this “chat session,” you may ask Mr. Garber or the Quest Cold War. As such, the drama of space exploration served staff questions about this article, or other ques- simply as a means to an end, not as an goal for its own sake. tions about research and writing the history of Contrary to this approach, some space enthusiasts have spaceflight. The “chat” will be held on Thursday, argued in hindsight that Kennedy pushed the U.S. to explore December 9,7:00CDT. We particularly welcome boldly into space because he was a visionary who saw space Quest subscribers, but anyone may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M
    Chapter Two Project Apollo: Americans to the Moon John M. Logsdon Project Apollo, the remarkable U.S. space effort that sent 12 astronauts to the surface of Earth’s Moon between July 1969 and December 1972, has been extensively chronicled and analyzed.1 This essay will not attempt to add to this extensive body of literature. Its ambition is much more modest: to provide a coherent narrative within which to place the various documents included in this compendium. In this narrative, key decisions along the path to the Moon will be given particular attention. 1. Roger Launius, in his essay “Interpreting the Moon Landings: Project Apollo and the Historians,” History and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 3 (September 2006): 225–55, has provided a com­ prehensive and thoughtful overview of many of the books written about Apollo. The bibliography accompanying this essay includes almost every book-length study of Apollo and also lists a number of articles and essays interpreting the feat. Among the books Launius singles out for particular attention are: John M. Logsdon, The Decision to Go to the Moon: Project Apollo and the National Interest (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970); Walter A. McDougall, . the Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age (New York: Basic Books, 1985); Vernon Van Dyke, Pride and Power: the Rationale of the Space Program (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1964); W. Henry Lambright, Powering Apollo: James E. Webb of NASA (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995); Roger E. Bilstein, Stages to Saturn: A Technological History of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles, NASA SP-4206 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1980); Edgar M.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Chapter 169KB
    Memorial Tributes: Volume 8 JEROME BERT WIESNER 290 Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 8 JEROME BERT WIESNER 291 Jerome Bert Wiesner 1915-1994 By Paul E. Gray In or out of public positions, he never stopped caring or working for the country's good. He never thought it was not his problem . [He] performed the office of public citizen better than any contemporary I know. Anthony Lewis The New York Times October 28, 1994 Jerome B. Wiesner—engineer, educator, adviser to presidents and the young, passionate advocate for peace, and public citizen—died on October 21, 1994, at his home in Watertown, Massachusetts, at the age of seventy-nine. Throughout his life, he applied his intellect and wisdom and energy to improve the many institutions with which he was involved, to ameliorate the problems clouding the future of humankind, and to make the world a better, safer, more humane home to all its citizens. Jerry was born in Detroit, Michigan, on May 30, 1915—the son of a shopkeeper—and grew up in nearby Dearborn, where he attended the public schools. He attended the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, where he earned bachelor of science degrees in electrical engineering and mathematics in 1937, the master of science degree in electrical engineering in 1938, and the doctor of philosophy degree in electrical engineering in 1950. Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Memorial Tributes: Volume 8 JEROME BERT WIESNER 292 He began his professional career in 1937 as associate director of the University of Michigan broadcasting service, and in 1940 moved to the Acoustical Record Library of the Library of Congress, where he served as chief engineer.
    [Show full text]
  • Neri Oxman Material Ecology
    ANTONELLI THE NERI OXMAN CALLS HER DESIGN APPROACH MATERIAL ECOLOGY— A PROCESS THAT DRAWS ON THE STRUCTURAL, SYSTEMIC, AND AESTHETIC WISDOM OF NATURE, DISTILLED AND DEPLOYED THROUGH COMPUTATION AND DIGITAL FABRICATION. THROUGHOUT HER TWENTY- ECOLOGY MATERIAL NERI OXMAN NERI OXMAN YEAR CAREER, SHE HAS BEEN A PIONEER OF NEW MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES, AND A CATALYST FOR DYNAMIC INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS. WITH THE MEDIATED MATTER MATERIAL GROUP, HER RESEARCH TEAM AT THE MIT MEDIA LAB, OXMAN HAS PURSUED RIGOROUS AND DARING EXPERIMENTATION THAT IS GROUNDED IN SCIENCE, PROPELLED BY VISIONARY THINKING, AND DISTINGUISHED BY FORMAL ELEGANCE. ECOLOGY PUBLISHED TO ACCOMPANY A MONOGRAPHIC EXHIBITION OF OXMAN’S WORK AT THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK, NERI OXMAN: MATERIAL ECOLOGY FEATURES ESSAYS BY PAOLA ANTONELLI AND CATALOGUE HADAS A. STEINER. ITS DESIGN, BY IRMA BOOM, PAYS HOMAGE TO STEWART BRAND’S LEGENDARY WHOLE EARTH CATALOG, WHICH CELEBRATED AND PROVIDED RESOURCES FOR A NEW ERA OF AWARENESS IN THE LATE 1960S. THIS VOLUME, IN TURN, HERALDS A NEW ERA OF ECOLOGICAL AWARENESS—ONE IN WHICH THE GENIUS OF NATURE CAN BE HARNESSED, AS OXMAN IS DOING, TO CREATE TOOLS FOR A BETTER FUTURE. Moma Neri Oxman Cover.indd 1-3 9.01.2020 14:24 THE NERI OXMAN MATERIAL ECOLOGY CATALOGUE PAOLA ANTONELLI WITH ANNA BURCKHARDT THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART, NEW YORK × Silk Pavilion I Imaginary Beings: Doppelgänger Published in conjunction with the exhibition Published by Neri Oxman: Material Ecology, at The Museum of The Museum of Modern Art, New York Modern Art, New York, February 22–May 25, 2020. 11 West 53 Street CONTENTS Organized by Paola Antonelli, Senior Curator, New York, New York 10019 Department of Architecture and Design, www.moma.org and Director, Research and Development; and Anna Burckhardt, Curatorial Assistant, © 2020 The Museum of Modern Art, New York 9 FOREWORD Department of Architecture and Design Certain illustrations are covered by claims to copyright cited on page 177.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rockefeller University Story
    CASPARY AUDITORIUM AND FOUNTAINS THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY STORY THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY STORY JOHN KOBLER THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY PRESS· 1970 COPYRIGHT© 1970 BY THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY PRESS LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUE CARD NO. 76-123050 STANDARD BOOK NO. 8740-015-9 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INTRODUCTION The first fifty years of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research have been recorded in depth and with keen insight by the medical his­ torian, George W. Corner. His story ends in 1953-a major turning point. That year, the Institute, which from its inception had been deeply in­ volved in post-doctoral education and research, became a graduate uni­ versity, offering the degree of Doctor of Philosophy to a small number of exceptional pre-doctoral students. Since 1953, The Rockefeller University's research and education pro­ grams have widened. Its achievements would fill a volume at least equal in size to Dr. Corner's history. Pending such a sequel, John Kobler, a journalist and biographer, has written a brief account intended to acquaint the general public with the recent history of The Rockefeller University. Today, as in the beginning, it is an Institution committed to excellence in research, education, and service to human kind. FREDERICK SEITZ President of The Rockefeller University CONTENTS INTRODUCTION V . the experimental method can meet human needs 1 You, here, explore and dream 13 There's no use doing anything for anybody until they're healthy 2 5 ... to become scholarly scientists of distinction 39 ... greater involvement in the practical affairs of society 63 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 71 INDEX 73 .
    [Show full text]
  • Seeds of Discovery: Chapters in the Economic History of Innovation Within NASA
    Seeds of Discovery: Chapters in the Economic History of Innovation within NASA Edited by Roger D. Launius and Howard E. McCurdy 2015 MASTER FILE AS OF Friday, January 15, 2016 Draft Rev. 20151122sj Seeds of Discovery (Launius & McCurdy eds.) – ToC Link p. 1 of 306 Table of Contents Seeds of Discovery: Chapters in the Economic History of Innovation within NASA .............................. 1 Introduction: Partnerships for Innovation ................................................................................................ 7 A Characterization of Innovation ........................................................................................................... 7 The Innovation Process .......................................................................................................................... 9 The Conventional Model ....................................................................................................................... 10 Exploration without Innovation ........................................................................................................... 12 NASA Attempts to Innovate .................................................................................................................. 16 Pockets of Innovation............................................................................................................................ 20 Things to Come ...................................................................................................................................... 23
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Biomedical Research and Education Campus Publications
    Rockefeller University Digital Commons @ RU The Future of Biomedical Research and Education Campus Publications 1979 The Future of Biomedical Research and Education The Rockefeller University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/future-biomedical-research- education THE FUTURE OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND EDUCATION Four Talks on the Occasion of the Installation of Dr. Joshua Lederberg as President of The Rockefeller University OCTOBER 16, 1978 ACKNOWLEDGMENT This publication has been aided by a grant from The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation, Inc. Copyright © 1979 THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY Library of Congress Catalogue Number 79-66963 ISBN 87470-031-0 Printed in the United States of America Foreword On October 16, 1978, Joshua Lederberg was installed as pres­ ident of The Rockefeller University. A Nobel laureate and a major contributor to modern genetics, Dr. Lederberg succeeded Frederick Seitz, the distinguished physicist who served as pres­ ident for 10 years and under whose leadership The Rockefeller University Council was founded. As part of the installation activities, the Council sponsored a colloquium on the outlook for biomedical research and education from the vantage points of the University and its two nearest institutional neighbors-Memorial-Sloan Ketter­ ing Cancer Center and Cornell University Medical College. The three speakers not only provided unique insights based on their individual involvement in the scientific pursuit, but also voiced concerns shared by the institutions they represent. Some of the major themes emerging from the colloquium were explored, eloquently and trenchantly, by Dr. Lederberg in his installation address. We are indebted to the generosity of The Carl and Lily Pforzheimer Foundation that makes it possible to present these four statements to the wider audience they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Invoking the Experts: Theantiballistic Missile Debate
    58 Advising or Legitimizing1 dated April 3, 1970: "lt would be unfortunate to leave the impremon that the [Garwin CHAPTER 5 teport) was 'highly crltical' of the SST program.'' [ Reprinted in Congressional Record 111 (1971): 32125.) DuBridge's letter stated further that the Garwin Report was prepared at President Nixon's request and would not be released; the quoted Statement was evidently intended to deceive Reuss as to the report's actual conclusions. 1. NBC radio interview with Rep. Reuss, reprinted in Congre11ional Record 115 (1969): 34743. Invoking the Experts : 8. Congreuional Record 115 (1969): 32599-32613. 9. lbid., p. 32606. 10. lbid., p. 32608. 11. Ibid., p. 3 261 o. The Antiballistic Missile 12. lbid., p. 32607. 13. U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations, Department of Transportation and Related Agencie1 Approprilltions for 1971, Part 3, April 23, 1970, pp. 980-994. Debate 14. Quoted in Saturday Review, August 15, 1970. lS. The suit was füed by the American Civil Ll"berties Union on behalf of Gary A. Soucie, executive director of the Friends of the Earth, and W. lloyd Tupling, Washington representative of the Siena Club. Peter L Koff of Boston was the volunteer attomey. 16. Letter from Edward E. David, Jr., PJesldent Nixon's science advisor, to Peter L Koff, August 17, 1971. 17. Subcommittee on Physical Effects, NAS-NRC Committee on SST-Sonic Boom, Report on Physical Effectl of the Sonlc Boom (Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. February 1968). 18. New Y«k Time1, March S, 1968. (This story was run in early editions but removed De.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twentieth-Century Science: a Case Study of Excellence in Biomedical Research
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers Working Paper Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Hollingsworth, Joseph Rogers (2002) : Research organizations and major discoveries in twentieth-century science: A case study of excellence in biomedical research, WZB Discussion Paper, No. P 02-003, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50229 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu P 02 – 003 RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS AND MAJOR DISCOVERIES IN TWENTIETH-CENTURY SCIENCE: A CASE STUDY OF EXCELLENCE IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uses and Limitations of Science Advisors 39 CHAPTER 3 Relationships with Other Powerful Institutions
    The Uses and Limitations of Science Advisors 39 CHAPTER 3 relationships with other powerful institutions. All of these arrangements constrain the options and the information available within the bureaucracy. Thus are bom bureaucratic procedures and bureaucratic truth. Leading govemment officials are usually eventually forced to respond to nonbureaucratic perceptions of reality-by the newspapers, by Congress, or by The Uses and Limitations the courts. But an astute leader will want to know in advance the likely responses to his actions, and he will not wish to be overly constrained by bureaucratic precedent. In order to obtain a candid response on these matters, of Science Advisors he must obviously turn to people whose own positions are sufficiently secure and independent that they will not be much influeneed by the reception their advice is accorded. Hence the need for outside advisors. This need is particularly acute in highly technical areas, where govemment officials often cannot entirely trust their own judgment and where the outside advisors may have a considerably broader expertise thar1 regular govemment employees. Besides helping to prevent the govemment from cutting itself off from reality, the science advisory system has sometimes also acted as an excellent The Need for Science Advice conduit for new ideas and infonnation-both within the govemment and between the govemment and the scientific community. This has been made AJthougb the vast majority of govemment scientific advisors are conc:me~ ~ith possible partly because of the way science advising was organized and partly relatively small decisions (such as the choice of materials to be used m_ military because of the nature of the scientists themselves.
    [Show full text]