DOCSLIB.ORG

First Nations' Aboriginal Interests and Traditional Use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project Area: a Summary and An

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FIRST NATIONS’ ABORIGINAL INTERESTS AND TRADITIONAL USE IN THE WANETA HYDROELECTRIC EXPANSION PROJECT AREA: A SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF KNOWN AND AVAILABLE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Prepared at the Request of: WANETA EXPANSION POWER CORPORATION As Reference Information for Project Area First Nations Prepared by: Randy Bouchard and Dorothy Kennedy Bouchard & Kennedy Research Consultants 171 Bushby Street, Victoria, British Columbia, V8S 1B5 August 20, 2004 (Rev. 11/2005) FIRST NATIONS’ ABORIGINAL INTERESTS AND TRADITIONAL USE IN THE WANETA HYDROELECTRIC EXPANSION PROJECT AREA: A SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS OF KNOWN AND AVAILABLE BACKGROUND INFORMATION Prepared at the Request of: WANETA EXPANSION POWER CORPORATION As Reference Information for Project Area First Nations Prepared by: Randy Bouchard and Dorothy Kennedy Bouchard & Kennedy Research Consultants 171 Bushby Street, Victoria, British Columbia, V8S 1B5 August 20, 2004 (Rev. 11/2005) First Nations’ Aboriginal Interests and Traditional Use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project Area: A Summary and Analysis of Known and Available Information TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Report Objectives........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations of Claimant First Nations ................................... 2 1.3.1 Okanagan-Colville Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations ................................ 2 1.3.2 Lakes Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations ..................................................... 6 1.3.3 Kutenai Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations .................................................. 8 1.4 Contemporary First Nations' Claims to the Waneta Area ......................................... 10 1.5 Places of Cultural Significance.................................................................................. 11 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Lakes and Okanagan Literature Review.................................................................... 13 2.2 Kutenai Literature Review......................................................................................... 18 3.0 SITE-SPECIFIC TRADITIONAL USE INFORMATION RELATING TO THE AREA OF THE WANETA HYDROELECTRIC EXPANSION PROJECT ................ 23 3.1 Pend d'Oreille River Mouth/Waneta and the Surrounding Region ........................... 24 3.2 Some Culturally-Significant Plants Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area ................................................................................................... 31 3.3 Some Culturally-Significant Animals Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area ................................................................................................... 37 3.4 Some Culturally-Significant Birds Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area .................................................................................................... 40 3.5 Some Culturally-Significant Fish (and Freshwater Shellfish) Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area..................................................................... 41 4.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................. 45 5.0 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................... 47 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Use of “Sturgeon-nosed Canoes” and Use of Horses by the Lakes and Lower Kutenai First Nations...............................................................................................A-1 Appendix B: Cultural Background Information — The Lakes (Sngaytskstx) First Nation .......... B-1 Appendix C: Cultural Background Information — The Kutenai First Nation.............................. C-1 August 2004 (Rev. 11/2005) Page i First Nations’ Aboriginal Interests and Traditional Use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project Area: A Summary and Analysis of Known and Available Information LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Some Culturally-Significant Plants Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area .........................................................................................................32 Table 2: Some Culturally-Significant Animals Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area .........................................................................................................38 Table 3: Some Culturally-Significant Fish (and Shellfish) Found or Likely to be Found in the Waneta Area .........................................................................................................42 Table 4: Some of the Commodities Traded from Lakes, Lower Kutenai and Kalispel/Pend D’Oreille at Fort Colville, 1827-1828 .........................................................................B-9 Table 5: The Identity of Lakes (sngaytskstx) Chiefs, 1830-1906 .............................................B-27 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project And Surrounding Territory ...........................3 Page ii August 2004 (Rev. 11/2005) First Nations’ Aboriginal Interests and Traditional Use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project Area: A Summary and Analysis of Known and Available Information 1.0 INTRODUCTION In May 2004 the Waneta Expansion Power Corporation requested Randy Bouchard and Dr. Dorothy Kennedy to compile a report providing background information relating to First Nations’ aboriginal interests and traditional use in the proposed Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project (WEP) area, located at the confluence of the Pend d’ Oreille and Columbia Rivers adjacent to the Canada/United States border (see Figure 1). 1.1 Report Objectives The objectives of this report are to summarize and analyze the known and available ethnographic, ethnohistoric and linguistic background information pertinent to First Nations’ aboriginal interests and traditional use in the area of the WEP. This report relies mainly on the extensive research already compiled on behalf of Columbia Power Corporation by Bouchard and Kennedy between 1998 and 2000, the analysis of which has been presented in the comprehensive report entitled First Nations’ Ethnography and Ethnohistory in British Columbia’s Lower Kootenay/Columbia Hydropower Region (Bouchard and Kennedy 2000[reprinted in April, 2005]). While no new research has been undertaken, the present report re-focusses and expands upon those sections of the voluminous 2000 work that are relevant to the Waneta area. The present study includes additional information obtained by Bouchard and Kennedy during the course of their more than 35 years of research in this region, some of which is contained in the following reports and publications: Kennedy and Bouchard (1975; 1998); Bouchard and Kennedy (1984a; 1985); and Turner, Bouchard and Kennedy (1980). 1.2 Report Structure This report is comprised of six sections. Section 1.0 sets out the context of this report, lists its objectives, and identifies the First Nations whose cultural history has been investigated. This first section also includes a short discussion of “traditional use sites,” i.e. places of cultural significance to aboriginal people. As well, Section 1.0 contains a brief review of contemporary First Nations’ claims to lands and resources within the study area. Section 2.0 provides a literature review of the available sources of information that we have considered in our review of First Nations’ aboriginal interests and traditional use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project area. August 2004 (Rev. 11/2005) Page 1 First Nations’ Aboriginal Interests and Traditional Use in the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project Area: A Summary and Analysis of Known and Available Information Section 3.0 describes specific aboriginal land use that occurred in the immediate environs of the Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project, and presents an identification of flora and fauna that are culturally significant to First Nations and are found, or are likely to be found, in the vicinity of the WEP site. Section 4.0 presents the Conclusions of this report, while Section 5.0 lists the sources cited within the preceding sections as well as the Appendices. Appendices A through C provide supplementary cultural and ethnographic summaries of those aspects of aboriginal society that are important for the consideration of traditional land use in the Waneta area. Appendix A provides a description of the use of sturgeon-nosed canoes and horses as transportation by the Lakes and Kutenai First Nations in this region of the Columbia Basin. Appendices B and C provide general cultural and ethnographic summaries of the Lakes and Kutenai First Nations respectively. 1.3 Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations of Claimant First Nations This section discusses the linguistic and cultural affiliations of the Okanagan-Colville, Lakes and Kutenai, all of whom claim aboriginal interests in the proposed Waneta Hydroelectric Expansion Project area. 1.3.1 Okanagan-Colville Linguistic and Cultural Affiliations The term "Okanagan-Colville" — sometimes called “Colville-Okanagan,” or just “Okanagan” — is used to describe the language known by these
Recommended publications
  • Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013

    Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013

    L O CA L GOVERNMEN TS’ COMMI TTEE Columbia River Treaty: Recommendations December 2013 The BC Columbia River Treaty Local Governments’ Committee (the Committee) has prepared these Recommendations in response to the Columbia River Treaty-related interests and issues raised by Columbia River Basin residents in Canada. These Recommendations are based on currently-available information. They have been submitted to the provincial and federal governments for incorporation into current decisions regarding the future of the Columbia River Treaty (CRT). The Committee plans to monitor the BC, Canadian and U.S. CRT-related processes and be directly involved when appropriate. As new information becomes available, the Committee will review this information, seek input from Basin residents, and submit further recommendations to the provincial and federal governments, if needed. The CRT Local Governments’ Committee will post its recommendations and other documents at www.akblg.ca/content/columbia-river-treaty. For more information contact the Committee Chair, Deb Kozak ([email protected] 250 352-9383) or the Executive Director, Cindy Pearce ([email protected] 250 837-3966). Background Beginning in 2024, either the U.S. or Canada can The Columbia River Treaty (Treaty) was ratified terminate substantial portions of the Treaty, by Canada and the United States (the U.S.) in with at least 10 years’ prior notice. Canada—via 1964, resulting in the construction of three the BC Provincial Government—and the U.S. are dams in Canada—Mica Dam north of both conducting reviews to consider whether to Revelstoke; Hugh Keenleyside Dam near continue, amend or terminate the Treaty. Castlegar; and Duncan Dam north of Kaslo—and Local governments within the Basin have Libby Dam near Libby, Montana.
  • Stehekin River Classification

    Stehekin River Classification

    Stehekin Wild & Scenic River Eligibility Report FINAL DRAFT May 2002 Acknowledgments . The National Park Service gratefully acknowledges the support and assistance of the U.S. Forest Service Wenatchee and Okanogan National Forests – their assistance was critical in this report’s development. Special thanks also to the staff at the North Cascades National Park for helping to make the field work a very pleasant and informative experience. Executive Summary This study report evaluates the eligibility and classification of the Stehekin River watershed, located in the North Cascades Mountains of Washington State, as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (National System). This evaluation is done partially in settlement of a cause of action brought by the North Cascades Conservation Council1, but primarily as a Department of the Interior requirement for normal management planning processes. The Stehekin River and its tributaries constitute a comparatively small watershed. Most of the natural and cultural resources found in the watershed are dependent not just on the main stem of the Stehekin River, but also on its tributaries. There is also no clear demarcation between most resources throughout the watershed. For these reasons, it is appropriate to consider the entire Stehekin River system as a single unit for the purposes of this evaluation, with the exception of classifying segments of the river as described later. Under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (Act), the river must meet physical requirements (eligibility). These physical requirements are: 1) the river must be free-flowing; and 2) the river must have at least one resource important or unique to the region or nation.
  • Kootenai River Resident Fish Mitigation: White Sturgeon, Burbot, Native Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation

    Kootenai River Resident Fish Mitigation: White Sturgeon, Burbot, Native Salmonid Monitoring and Evaluation

    KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION: WHITE STURGEON, BURBOT, NATIVE SALMONID MONITORING AND EVALUATION Annual Progress Report May 1, 2016 — April 31, 2017 BPA Project # 1988-065-00 Report covers work performed under BPA contract # 68393 IDFG Report Number 08-09 April 2018 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. This report should be cited as follows: Ross et al. 2018. Report for 05/01/2016 – 04/30/2017. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: KOOTENAI STURGEON MONITORING AND EVALUATION ............................... 1 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................3 STUDY SITE ...............................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................3 Water
  • “Viewpoints” on Reconciliation: Indigenous Perspectives for Post-Secondary Education in the Southern Interior of Bc

    “Viewpoints” on Reconciliation: Indigenous Perspectives for Post-Secondary Education in the Southern Interior of Bc

    “VIEWPOINTS” ON RECONCILIATION: INDIGENOUS PERSPECTIVES FOR POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION IN THE SOUTHERN INTERIOR OF BC 2020 Project Synopsis By Christopher Horsethief, PhD, Dallas Good Water, MA, Harron Hall, BA, Jessica Morin, MA, Michele Morin, BSW, Roy Pogorzelski, MA September 1, 2020 Research Funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Executive Summary This research project synopsis presents diverse Indigenous community perspectives regarding the efforts needed to enable systemic change toward reconciliation within a public post-secondary educational institution in the Southern Interior of British Columbia. The main research question for this project was “How does a community college respectfully engage in reconciliation through education with the First Nations and Métis communities in the traditional territories in which it operates?” This research was realized by a team of six Indigenous researchers, representing distinct Indigenous groups within the region. It offers Indigenous perspectives, insights, and recommendations that can help guide post-secondary education toward systemic change. This research project was Indigenous led within an Indigenous research paradigm and done in collaboration with multiple communities throughout the Southern Interior region of British Columbia. Keywords: Indigenous-led research, Indigenous research methodologies, truth and reconciliation, Indigenous education, decolonization, systemic change, public post- secondary education in BC, Southern Interior of BC ii Acknowledgements This research was made possible through funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. The important contributions from the Sinixt, Ktunaxa, Syilx, and Métis Elders, Knowledge Keepers, youth, men, and women within this project are essential to restoring important aspects of education that have been largely omitted from the public education system.
  • An Examination of Nuu-Chah-Nulth Culture History

    An Examination of Nuu-Chah-Nulth Culture History

    SINCE KWATYAT LIVED ON EARTH: AN EXAMINATION OF NUU-CHAH-NULTH CULTURE HISTORY Alan D. McMillan B.A., University of Saskatchewan M.A., University of British Columbia THESIS SUBMI'ITED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Archaeology O Alan D. McMillan SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY January 1996 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Alan D. McMillan Degree Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis Since Kwatyat Lived on Earth: An Examination of Nuu-chah-nulth Culture History Examining Committe: Chair: J. Nance Roy L. Carlson Senior Supervisor Philip M. Hobler David V. Burley Internal External Examiner Madonna L. Moss Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon External Examiner Date Approved: krb,,,) 1s lwb PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
  • Power System

    Power System

    HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST Kevin Schneider Ph.D., P.E. Chair, Seattle Chapter of the IEEE PES IEEE PES SCHOLARSHIP PLUS INITIATIVE 2 Washington State PES Scholars • Patrick Berg, Seattle University • Parichehr Karimi, University of • Zachary Burrows, Eastern Washington Washington UiUnivers ity • TiTravis Kinney, WhitWashington Sta te UiUnivers ity • Erin Clement, University of Washington • Allan Koski, Eastern Washington University • Anastasia Corman, University of • Kyle Lindgren, University of Washington, Washington • John Martinsen, Washington State • Gwendolyn Crabtree, Washington State University University • Melissa Martinsen, University of • David Dearing, Washington State Washington University • JthJonathan NhiNyhuis, SttlSeattle PifiPacific UiUnivers ity • Terra Donley, Gonzaga University Derek Jared Pisinger, Washington State Gowrylow, Seattle University University • Sanel Hirkic, Washington State University • Douglas Rapier, Washington State • Nathan Hirsch, Eastern Washington University University • Chris Rusnak, Washington State University • John Hofman, Washington State • Kaiwen Sun, University of Washington University • Joshua Wu, Seattle University • • Tracy Yuan, University of Washington 3 OVERVIEW Part 1: The Current Status of the Electricity Infrastructure in the Pacific North west Part 2: How the Current System Evolved Over Time Part 3: Current Challenges and the Path Forward Part 4: Concluding Comments PART 1:: THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE ELECTRICITY INFRASTRUCTURE
  • Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians

    Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians Cynthia J. Manning The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Manning, Cynthia J., "Ethnohistory of the Kootenai Indians" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5855. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5855 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished m a n u s c r ip t in w h ic h c o p y r ig h t su b ­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s c o n ten ts must be a ppro ved BY THE AUTHOR. MANSFIELD L ib r a r y Un iv e r s it y of Montana D a te : 1 9 8 3 AN ETHNOHISTORY OF THE KOOTENAI INDIANS By Cynthia J. Manning B.A., University of Pittsburgh, 1978 Presented in partial fu lfillm en t of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Approved by: Chair, Board of Examiners Fan, Graduate Sch __________^ ^ c Z 3 ^ ^ 3 Date UMI Number: EP36656 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
  • Mining in British Columbia

    Mining in British Columbia

    BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES HON. R. E. SOMMERS, Minister JOHN F. WALKEE, Deputy Minister MINING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA An Outline of the Development of the Industry VICTORIA, B.C. Printed by DON MCDIARMID, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty 1954 BCEMPR MiSC PUB-33 c.3 nisc 0005073968 PUB-33 c-3 BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES E. SOMMERS, Minister JOHN F. WALKER, Deputy Minister MINING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA An Outline of the Development of the Industry VICTORIA, B.C. Primed by DON MCDIAHMID, Printer to the Queen's Most Excellent Majesty 1954 This pamphlet deals principally with the history of mining activity in British Columbia to the end of the year 1953. The written account is supplemented by a selection of photographs. MINING IN BRITISH COLUMBIA It is a curious fact that, although what is now British Columbia possessed a vast wealth of visible resources, little attention was paid to them in the eighty years following Captain Cook's visit to the west coast of Vancouver Island in 1778. Such interest as was aroused was mainly in furs. It was interest in fur that led John Meares to establish his short-lived post at Nootka, and interest in fur that spurred Alexander Mackenzie, Simon Fraser, and David Thompson to undertake their arduous expeditions into British Colum• bia from the eastern side of the Rocky Mountains. In the period from 1805 to 1849 fifteen posts were established along the routes of the fur brigades, and here and there the Oblate Fathers had planted churches among the tribes.
  • Native Perspectives on Sustainability: Jeannette Armstrong (Syilx)

    Native Perspectives on Sustainability: Jeannette Armstrong (Syilx)

    NPS: Armstrong 1 Native Perspectives on Sustainability: Jeannette Armstrong (Syilx) Interviewee: Jeanette Armstrong Interviewer: David E. Hall Date: 10/21/07 Transcribed: Brianna Finney DH: Thank you for taking your time with us today. As you know from our other conversations this project is about sustainability from the perspective of indigenous leaders and our aim is to hear from you on the subject today. JA: Okay DH: To start can you just share a little bit about yourself in terms of your background, cultural heritage, and your work? JA: My name is Jeannette Armstrong. My Okanagan Syilx name means something like the light, rippling off of moving water. It’s an image name. I come from the Okanagan, but my mother is from Kettle Falls at the Columbia River. The Okanagan River is the most northern area that the salmon reach in their spawn. I come from a people that were people that respected and loved salmon on the way to the Columbia. DH: So you mentioned some of the geography and the area that you are connected with. How would you define your community in terms of geography and people? JA: We’re Salishan peoples of the interior plateau. There are quite a number of Salishan tribes in the interior Columbia River Basin area, and we’re simply one of them. One of the things about the Okanagan is that, the Okanagan Lake System of course is quite a large lake system, and empties into the Okanagan River and meets the Columbia River at Brewster, Washington. So my Nation, the Okanagan Nation, is actually larger than the Okanagan valley and it was simply a name attributed to us because I guess the population of people in the Okanagan Valley was significant.
  • Effects of Dams on Native Americans in the Columbia River Basin Elliott

    Effects of Dams on Native Americans in the Columbia River Basin Elliott

    Dammed Societies: Effects of Dams on Native Americans in the Columbia River Basin Elliott McGill Senior Capstone Project Faculty Advisors: Dr. Jamie Dolan, Dr. Jeremy Johnson, and Dr. David McCanna McGill 1 Abstract Since dam construction began in the New Deal Era, it has represented a dominance of humankind over nature. These massive structures have harnessed, collected, and distributed electricity from the rivers they hold back and allow humans to reap the benefits of that cycle. One of the areas where dams are particularly apparent is in the Columbia River Basin in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. While the dams in this region certainly have allowed the area to develop and build by using the electricity collected by these dams, they have also had several negative effects on the tribal people in the region who once fished the mighty Columbia during its populous salmon runs and relied on the salmon for nutritional, economic, and cultural reasons. This project seeks to examine the costs of human advancement when it comes to dams, and will do so by studying three dams located in the Columbia River Basin: The Bonneville Dam, The Dalles Dam, and The Grand Coulee Dam. These dams will be studied using Black’s Theory of Law as a framework to examine the manner in which law was applied to each case. The research finds that although the dams certainly provide a useful resource to the people of the region, it has had negative effects on the Native American people who depended on the river. McGill 2 Introduction When President Franklin D.
  • Download the Full Report 2007 5.Pdf PDF 1.8 MB

    Download the Full Report 2007 5.Pdf PDF 1.8 MB

    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Directory of Columbia River Basin Tribes Council Document Number: 2007-05 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Tribes and Tribal Confederations 5 The Burns Paiute Tribe 7 The Coeur d’Alene Tribe 9 The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 12 The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 15 The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 18 The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon 21 The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 23 The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 25 The Kalispel Tribe of Indians 28 The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 31 The Nez Perce Tribe 34 The Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation 37 The Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation 40 The Spokane Tribe of Indians 42 III. Canadian First Nations 45 Canadian Columbia River Tribes (First Nations) 46 IV. Tribal Associations 51 Canadian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission 52 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 53 Upper Columbia United Tribes 55 Upper Snake River Tribes 56 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory i ii The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory 1 2 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Council assembled this directory to enhance our understanding and appreciation of the Columbia River Basin tribes, including the First Nations in the Canadian portion of the basin. The directory provides brief descriptions and histories of the tribes and tribal confedera- tions, contact information, and information about tribal fi sh and wildlife projects funded through the Council’s program.
  • Kettle Falls, a Reader 1 S Commentary on a Site On

    Kettle Falls, a Reader 1 S Commentary on a Site On

    • WASHINGTON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, p 0 Box 84, UNIVERSITY STATION, SEATTLE 98/05 NEWSLETTER Volume XIV, Number 1 APRIL, 1970 • CONTENTS: KETTLE FALLS, A READER 1 S COMMENTARY ON A SITE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER••o•o••o•o••••••••••o••••••••Don Miles THE SALVAGE OF EXPOSED CULTURAL MATERIAL AND A BISON MOLAR FROM CHINA BEND.o •• as related by Pauline Crane THE CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS OF THE WASHINGTON STATE •• ARCHAEOLOGICAL COUNCIL -1- This issue of the ARCHAEOLOGIST concentrates on the northeast part of the State of Washington, particularly on the region around K,ettle Fa.lls and the Colville River Valley. KETTLE FALLS, A READER'S COMMENTARY ON A SITE ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER by Don Miles is a plea for consequent action during the next low-water period of the Columbia . }>ehind Grand Coulee Dam. This will probably take place in 1973. May -was a lost .. opportunity for archaeology since only the relic hunters and collectors came in numbers. Archaeologists visiting the site seem to have produced little; certainly no excavatiou of even a salvage nature was done. Being under the jurisdiction of -the Federal Government through the National Parks Division, Lake Roosevelt is out­ of•bounds for any but authorized persons to excavate. The status of surface collectors is unclear, but -usually in t he absence· of authority collectors tend to do as they please. The responsibility of investigating and reclaiming any archae­ ological material rests with the govenment or ·its agent. In the absence of any action the crisis between the professional and the amateur persists. The emergency nature of the 1973 exposure of old sites demands planning, action, and the coopera­ tion of professional and amateur in reclaiming as much as possible from important sites along the Upper Columbia.