Determinants of Household Food Security in Musanze District, Rwanda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Determinants of Household Food Security in Musanze District, Rwanda International Journal of Agriculture and Food Security ISSN: 0812-3497 Vol. 6(1), pp. 168-182, April, 2019 Available online at www.advancedscholarsjournals.org © Advanced Scholars Journals Full length Research paper Determinants of Household Food Security in Musanze District, Rwanda Thomas Gill1*, Amanda Kaeser1, David Ader1, Emily Urban1, Tracy Bucyana2 1 University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Smith International Center, 2640 Morgan Circle Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA 2 Zamura Feeds, Inc., Ruhungeri, Musanze District, Rwanda Accepted 28 March, 2019. Despite significant economic growth and development in Rwanda over the past 20 years, twenty percent of Rwandan households remain food insecure. Interventions to address the wide variations in household food insecurity in Rwanda need to be data-driven. It is important to first characterize the household food security landscape within an intervention’s proposed target area, so that stakeholders can design appropriate food security interventions. The food security status of households in Musanze District, northwest Rwanda, was measured using both an experience-based scale and a 24-hour dietary recall method, and calculated regression models to identify the significant determinants of household food security in Musanze District. Findings indicated that urban households which owned multiple assets, and had a household member with an education beyond primary school were most likely to be food secure in Musanze District. Amount of food purchased from the market was also identified as a significant determinant of household food security in the dietary recall model. Implications include the need to: 1) use multiple measures for food security characterization, 2) consider multiple educational pathways in food security interventions for long-term, sustainable impact, and, 3) base food security interventions on appropriate-scale data, including spatial context, to result in intended impacts. Key words: dietary diversity; nutrition; Africa; education; appropriate-scale data. Abbreviations (ASAP) African Sustainable Agriculture Project Foundation, (CFSVA) Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis, (CHW) Community Health Workers, (FAO) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FIES) Food Insecurity Experience Scale, (HDDS) Household Dietary Diversity Score, (MDD-W) Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women, (TI) USAID Feed the Future Tworore Inkoko, Twunguke, (USAID) United States Agency for International Development, (USG) United States Government, (UTIA) University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture (WFP) World Food Programme of the United Nations. INTRODUCTION The Sustainable Development Goals of the United achieving this goal is what transpires in sub-Saharan Nations have set an ambitious target of ending hunger Africa, the region with the largest available acreage of globally by 2030 (United Nations, 2015). Central to underutilized land and fastest growing population (Tiwari et al., 2018). While questions remain as to how hunger can really be addressed in conflict-prone areas of the continent, countries that have enjoyed relative peace and stability over the Millennium Development Goal period *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Phone: +1- (2000-2015) lend hope that a food secure Africa can be 865-974-5797; ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-8684 attained (Adenle et al., 2017). Thomas. et al 169 Rwanda has enjoyed a period of relative peace and of food available and accessible to a household is stability since the genocide of 1994, and has shown dependent upon a household’s level of knowledge about, remarkable progress toward abolishing hunger. Under its and current practices related to food preparation, storage, “Vision 2020”, and driven by rapid population expansion intra-household distribution of food, and dietary/nutritional and agricultural development, Rwanda has experienced diversity. an annual 15-year-average (2000-2015) economic growth rate of 7.8%, well above the sub-Saharan African Stability average of 2.3% (World Bank, 2017). This has resulted in increased food availability from higher crop production refers to a household’s ability to withstand shocks and volumes, resulting in Rwanda becoming self-sufficient in stresses to its food security status, such as changes in food supply in 2009 (World Bank, 2011). Despite this, political or economic climates, and environmental much of this food availability trend has been accounted challenges such as climate change. for by a move to calorie-dense roots and tubers, and These four dimensions are general guidelines to away from grains and plant- and animal-based protein analyzing food security, however previous studies have production (de Graaff et al., 2011). The most recent identified a variety of determinants of household food (2015) Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability security. Recent research shows that food secure Analysis (CFSVA), compiled by the Rwandan households (versus food insecure households) in low- government, describes the task ahead: twenty percent of income countries are more likely to be urban (Smith et all Rwandan households remain food insecure (WFP, al., 2005), have more years of schooling (Maharjan and 2016). It is likely that the household food security Joshi, 2011; Oluwatayo, 2009), have more assets (Guo, landscape is multi-faceted, with food and nutritional 2011; Harris-Fry et al., 2015), own livestock (Haile et al., concerns including sufficient per capita caloric, protein 2005), and spend more on food in the market (Omotesho and/or micronutrient intake. The challenge to bring these et al., 2010; Melgar-Quinonez et al., 2006). Food secure households to food security is made markedly more households are also less likely to be employed in the complex by climate change, environmental degradation agriculture sector (Maharjan and Joshi, 2011; Beyene and a 2.8% annual population growth rate (Paul et al., and Muche, 2010). Studies have also shown that other 2017). important determinants of household food security At the World Food Summit in 1996, the United Nations include variables such as household size (Babatunde et Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) defined food al., 2007; Sekhampu, 2013), number of females of security to exist when “all people, at all times, have reproductive age in a household (Harris-Fry et al., 2015), physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe, access to other productive resources (e.g. land, credit, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food other inputs) (Aidoo et al., 2013; Bogale and Genene, preferences for an active and healthy life”. This 2012; Bashir and Mehmood, 2010; Tefera, 2009), overarching and widely-accepted definition contains four agricultural practices, technology adoption and farming dimensions of food security: availability, access, systems (Beyene and Muche, 2010; Feleke et al., 2005), utilization and stability (FAO, 2009). At the household and distance to markets (Feleke et al., 2005). level, these four dimensions can be described as: The 2015 CFSVA national survey identified key determinants of Rwandan household food security as:i) Availability urban/rural, ii) skilled labor, business owners and salaried work versus employment in agriculture, iii) available land addresses the supply of food to a population, and acreage, iv) production of crops for household includes productive resources needed to obtain food for consumption, v) ownership of livestock and vi) market the household, as well as a household’s stocks and net engagement for buying and selling food (WFP, 2016). trade of food; This same survey describes Rwandan food insecure households as ones that are unable to meet essential Access food and non-food needs without engaging in atypical coping strategies, have an unacceptable diet, and/or, use involves both economic purchasing power of a a high share of their budget to cover food needs. household, including income and other resources for However, at sub-national levels, food security varies buying or trading for food, as well as physical aspects of widely across Rwanda (Table 1). The percentage of food household food access, such as distance to markets and secure households by district varies from 98% in access to transport to reach markets to purchase or sell Nyarugenge District, Kigali Province, to 43% in Rutsiro food. District in Western Province (WFP, 2016). In order to appropriately design food security interventions and set Utilization attainable targets at the household level, it is important to 170 Int. J. Agric. Food Sec. first characterize the household food security landscape households are engaged in agricultural production, with within an intervention’s proposed target area. Projects the majority (58%) of agricultural production carried out and programs to address food insecurity are frequently by smallholders on landholdings of less than 0.5ha (WFP, directed towards specific regions within a country; 2016). With mean elevation of 1850m, favorable climate national level data are therefore insufficient to inform the (average temperatures between 59 and 77oF) and rich design and successful implementation of such volcanic soils, Musanze District’s predominant interventions. It is therefore paramount to identify which agricultural system includes production of starchy food socio-economic characteristics are significant crops such as potatoes, maize, bananas and wheat, determinants of food security in a region in order to along with beans and a variety of fruits
Recommended publications
  • INTER-ANNUAL TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY and PROJECTIONS on ITS IRISH POTATOES PRODUCTION in RWANDA (Case Study: MUSANZE and NYABIHU
    INTER-ANNUAL TEMPERATURE VARIABILITY AND PROJECTIONS ON ITS IRISH POTATOES PRODUCTION IN RWANDA (Case study: MUSANZE and NYABIHU Districts) RUKUNDO Emmanuel (MSc) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment for the award of the degree of Master of Science in the School of Science and Technology of University of Rwanda Supervisor: Prof. BONFILS Safari NOVEMBER 2018 i DECLARATION I Rukundo Emmanuel declare that, this thesis is my original work and has not been Presented/submitted for a degree in any other University or any other award. Rukundo Emmanuel Department of Physics Signature................................................. Date......................................... I confirm that the work reported in this thesis was carried out by the Student under my supervision. Prof. Bonfils Safari Department of Physics University of Rwanda Signature............................................ Date......................................... ii DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my parents who educated and taught me that there is no other way leading to the richness except to converge to school together with obeying God. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Foremost, this thesis is a result of the contribution of many peoples to whom I express my deepest gratitude. I am forever indebted to all of you who made my master’s journey possible. To my supervisor Prof Bonfils, who has been a source of knowledge, challenge and encouragement during the course of my studies, your guidance and valuable criticism were keys for the elaboration of this thesis and for my improvement as a researcher. Your great dedication to your students is impressive. I thank you for your close attention to detail on those many drafts you read. To my lecturer including Dr Gasore Jimmy, who helped me in every step of this study and whose enthusiasm for science have made these masters a true adventure for me.
    [Show full text]
  • REPUBLIC of RWANDA NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN of the STOCKHOLM CONVENTION on PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (Pops) in RWAN
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA MINISTRY OF LANDS, ENVIRONMENT, FORESTRY, WATER AND MINES P.O.BOX 3502 KIGALI‐RWANDA AH POP‐MINITERE PROJECT (GEF / RWA / 03/0005) NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN OF THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION ON PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (POPs) IN RWANDA: 2007-2025 Kigali, December 2006 FOREWORD The Republic of Rwanda became a Party to the Stockholm Convention in order to work in liaison with the International Community to tackle problems arising from the persistent organic pollutants (POPs). After the war and the genocide of 1994 that cast gloom over the country and the emergency period that followed, Rwanda has now embarked on the road towards development that would reconcile both the population needs and ecological concerns. Commitments made in the framework of the Stockholm Convention came to reinforce initiatives and priority actions undertaken by the Government of Rwanda through sector policies in order to achieve environment protection and management, poverty reduction and investments promotion. Concerns related to the toxicological and ecotoxycologic impacts of dangerous chemicals never ceased to extend, their intrinsic toxicity being often worsened by mismanagement of their life cycle which results into the accumulation of all kinds of effluents and increasingly cumbersome stockpiles. The Stockholm Convention is a legally binding treaty which Rwanda ratified on 4 June 2002. It constitutes one of the significant answers of the International Community in fighting against harmful effects both for human health and environment. The rejections of POPs are a factor of aggravation of poverty in developing countries and hinder the governments’ efforts for a sustainable development. To meet its obligations provided for by article 7 of the Convention, Rwanda carried out inventories of POPs pesticides, polychlorobiphenyls (PCBS) and dioxins and furans.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Poverty and Ecosystem Services: a Series of Seven Country Scoping Studies
    onnecting C poverty ecosystem &services A series of seven country scoping studies Focus on Rwanda Connecting poverty and ecosystem services: A series of seven country scoping studies © 2005 United Nations Environment Programme and the International Institute for Sustainable Development Published for the United Nations Environment Programme by the International Institute for Sustainable Development United Nations Environment Programme The mission of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is to provide leadership and to encourage partner- ships in caring for the environment by inspiring, informing and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of life without compromising that of future generations. Division of Policy Development and Law (DPDL) The objective of DPDL, a division within UNEP, is to enable members of the international community to develop integrated and coherent policy responses to environmental problems and to strengthen environmental law as well as to improve com- pliance with and enforcement of legal instruments. The Poverty-Environment Unit Within DPDL, the Poverty-Environment Unit is responsible for coordination of policy review, analysis and development as well as for the promotion of regional and national environmental policy development. It fosters partnerships with UN agen- cies, donors, the private sector and civil society to promote policy development in areas such as water, land-use, drylands, urban environment, poverty and environment linkages, health and environment, climate change and energy. United Nations Environment Programme United Nations Avenue, Gigiri PO Box 30552 Nairobi, Kenya Tel: (254-2) 621234 Fax: (254-2) 624489/90 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.unep.org International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development contributes to sustainable development by advancing policy rec- ommendations on international trade and investment, economic policy, climate change, measurement and assessment, and natural resources management.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda LAND Report: Access to the Land Tenure Administration
    STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT July 2015` This report is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Written by: INES - Ruhengeri CONTACT INFORMATION: LAND Project Nyarutarama, Kigali Tel: +250 786 689 685 [email protected] STUDY ON ACCESS TO THE LAND TENURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM IN RWANDA AND THE OUTCOMES OF THE SYSTEM ON ORDINARY CITIZENS FINAL REPORT Subcontract No. AID=696-C-12-00002-INES-10 Chemonics International Recommended Citation: BIRARO, Mireille; KHAN, Selina; KONGUKA, George; NGABO, Valence; KANYIGINYA, Violet; TUMUSHERURE, Wilson and JOSSAM, Potel; 2015. Final Report of Study on the access to the land tenure administration system in Rwanda and the outcomes of the system on ordinary citizens. Kigali, Rwanda: USAID | LAND Project. September, 2015 The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Musanze District in Rwanda AUGUST 2020
    Urban-Rural Linkages in Times of Coronavirus Pandemic: Lessons from Musanze District in Rwanda AUGUST 2020 1 Copyright © 2020 Global Green Growth Institute Jeongdong Building 19F 21-15 Jeongdong-gil Jung-gu, Seoul 04518 Republic of Korea The Global Green Growth Institute does not make any warranty, either express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed of the information contained herein or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Global Green Growth Institute. Cover Image © Ilija Gubic Acknowledgements This report is written by Ilija Gubic and Andrew Kabera of Global Green Growth Institute. This report was reviewed by Daniel Ogbonnaya and Michelle DeFreese and edited by Michelle DeFreese and Pamela Birungi of Global Green Growth Institute. Illustrations for the report are drawn by Dario Babudri for Global Green Growth Institute while report is designed by Irene Isingizwe of Amasimbi Creative Ltd. 1. Introduction 5 Contents 2. Material and methods 6 3. Importance of urban-rural linkages 7 4. Results and Discussion 8 5. Case Study: Urban-Rural Linkages in 9 Musanze District . 6. Conclusions and Recommendations 21 7. References 21 4 1. Introduction Since December 2019, human life around the an infected person coughs or sneezes. COVID19’s world has been put into turmoil due to the global main difference with other coronaviruses is spread of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Baseline Study on Multi Dime Povty for Musanze & Bugesera.Pdf
    i Acknowledgements The Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA) wishes to acknowledge contributions of organizations and individuals who made possible the success of the Baseline study on Multi- dimensional Poverty Environment in Musanze and Bugesera Districts and proposed Interventions for poverty reduction, sustainability and climate resilience. We would like to express our gratitude to The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) who provided financial assistance to fund this activity. Their contribution is immensely appreciated. We would like to express our special thanks to the European Union, the Austrian Development Agency, the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Sweden Sverige, their contribution is immensely appreciated. We take this opportunity to acknowledge the invaluable support from members of Technical Working Group from the following Governments and privates’ institutions Local Administrative Entities Development Agency (LODA), Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Resources (MINAGRI), National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR), Rwanda Agriculture Board (RAB), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (CGIAR/IITA), The Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC), Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning (MINECOFIN), BUGESERA District and MUSANZE District who provided guidance and inputs from the preparation and implementation of the study as well as all those who took part in different validation workshops. We recognize the valuable support provided by the Poverty and environment Action (PEA) team for coordinating the survey administration that allowed the study to run smoothly and in conducive conditions. We are thankful to Consultancy and Innovation Business Action (CIBA) Ltd who were commissioned to conduct this baseline survey; Special thanks go to the team leader Professor Francois Xavier Naramabuye for his valuable time that made this survey possible.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Rwanda Newsletter, December 2020
    FAO Rwanda Newsletter December 2020 — Issue #2 FAO/Teopista Mutesi FAO/Teopista Sustaining food systems with rural women in agriculture potential risk in the region. There are many more interesting stories from the people we work in the field in this newsletter. We congratulate our FAO-Rwanda colleague, Jeanne d’Arc who was recognized by the FAO Director General as a committed staff to the Organization, and welcome to new staff who joined the office during the difficult times. I move my vote of thanks to the FAO-Rwanda team, FAO regional and headquarters offices, our partners, service providers and the farmers for your commtiment, together we have made it! I look forward to working with you, and FAO/Teopista Mutesi FAO/Teopista more partners in the coming year. Message from the FAO Representative I wish you a happy holiday season, and blessings in the New Year 2021! Dear Reader, Enjoy reading. We are almost at the end of 2020! For the most part of the year, the world has been battling with COVID-19 pandemic. Gualbert Gbehounou, We got familiar with the words like, build back better, FAO Representative lockdown, teleworking or ‘working from here’ and washing hands every now and then, etc. HIGHLIGHTS Empowering rural women to become entrepreneurs. It has been equally a challenging period working in the Vegetable farmers in rural Rwanda are building back field, yet, colleagues at FAO-Rwanda have been resilient better. and doubled efforts to improve the livelihoods of the Increasing organic farmers in Rwanda. farmers in Rwanda. Immediately after the COVID-19 Clarifying gender equality in the gender-based induced lockdown was lifted on the country, we distributed violence fight.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Country Operational Plan COP 2020 Strategic Direction Summary March 23, 2020
    Rwanda Country Operational Plan COP 2020 Strategic Direction Summary March 23, 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Updates to Program Context 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden, and country profile 2.2 New Activities and Areas of Focus for COP20, Including Focus on Client Retention 2.3 Investment profile 2.4 National sustainability profile update 2.5 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to disease burden 2.6 Stakeholder engagement 3.0 Geographic and population prioritization 4.0 Client-centered Program Activities for Epidemic Control 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment 4.2 Retaining clients on treatment and ensuring viral suppression 4.3 Prevention, specifically detailing programs for priority programming 4.4 Commodities 4.5 Collaboration, Integration, and Monitoring 4.6 Targets for scale-up locations and populations 4.7 Viral Load and Early Infant Diagnosis Optimization 5.0 Program Support Necessary to Achieve Sustained Epidemic Control 6.0 USG Management, Operations and Staffing Plan to Achieve Stated Goals Appendix A - Prioritization Appendix B - Budget Profile and Resource Projections Appendix C - Tables and Systems Investments for Section 6.0 Appendix D – Minimum Program Requirements 2 | P a g e 1.0 Goal Statement The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) worked closely with the Government of Rwanda (GOR), including senior leadership at the Ministry of Health (MOH), to develop Rwanda’s Country Operational Plan for 2020/Fiscal Year 2021 (COP 2020). All PEPFAR minimum program requirements and policies will be fully achieved prior to the end of COP 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • RWANDA Poverty Assessment
    RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized Poverty Global Practice Africa Region Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized April 2015 1 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment April 2015 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment 2 RWANDA Poverty Assessment Poverty Global Practice Africa Region April 2015 3 ׀ RWANDA Poverty Assessment Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................10.... I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... VIII11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................................12 IX 1. A Snapshot of Poverty in Rwanda ..........................................................................................................................12ix Rwanda‘s Poverty Profile: The Expected… ............................................................................................................13 x And the Rather Unexpected … .............................................................................................................................15 xii Inequality is high, driven by location, education, and occupation .......................................................................16 xiii Strong performance in health and basic education ................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis
    USAID/RWANDA GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ANALYSIS REPORT AUGUST 2019 Contract No.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 August 16, 2019 i This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Banyan Global. This publication was produced for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Contract Number AID-OAA-TO-17-00018. It was prepared by Banyan Global under the authorship of Dina Scippa and Mary Alice Bamusiime. Implemented by: am Names. Banyan Global 1120 20th Street NW, Suite 950 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: +1 202-684-9367 Disclaimer: The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States government. Recommended Citation: Scippa, Dina and Bamusiime, Mary Alice. USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis Report. Prepared by Banyan Global. 2019. ii USAID/RWANDA GENDER AND SOCIAL- INCLUSION ANALYSIS REPORT 2019 CONTRACT NO.: AID-OAA-TO-17-00018 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Background 6 1.2 Purpose of the USAID/Rwanda Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis 6 2. METHODOLOGY 8 2.1 Inception Report 8 2.2 Primary Data Collection 8 2.3 Presentation of Preliminary Findings to USAID 9 2.4 Primary Data Analysis and Interpretation and Report Preparation 9 2.5 Protection of Informant Information 9 2.6 Limitations of the Gender and Social Inclusion Analysis 10 3. RWANDA COUNTRY CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND 11 3.1 Country Context and Background 11 4. GENDER AND SOCIAL INCLUSION ANALYSIS FINDINGS, BY ADS 205 DOMAIN 13 4.1 Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Institutional Practices 13 4.2 Cultural Norms and Beliefs 14 4.3 Gender Roles, Responsibilities, and Time Use 15 4.4 Access to and Control Over Assets and Resources 15 4.5 Patterns of Power and Decision-Making 17 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Kivuye in Burera District Final
    REPUBLIC OF RWANDA Ministry of Infrastructure ENERGY WATER AND SANITATION AUTHORITY (EWSA) Electricity Access Rollout Programme (EARP) Head Office: Avenue de l’ Ihema, P.O.Box 537, Kigali-Rwanda Tel: +(250)252573666 Fax: +(250)(0)252573802 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ewsa.rw PROJECT BRIEF FOR THE INSTALLATION OF LOW VOLTAGE AND MEDIUM VOLTAGE LINES AND SERVICE CONNECTIONS IN BUNGWE – KIVUYE - GATEBE AREA IN BURERA DISTRICT December 2011 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................ 5 0. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 6 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 8 I.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 8 I.2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT ............................................................................................... 8 I.3. PROJECT ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................ 9 I.4. CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMME ..............................................................................................10 I.5. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................10 Description of Works ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Gacaca Promotional Campaign in Rwanda
    EVALUATION OF THE GACACA PROMOTIONAL CAMPAIGN IN RWANDA REPORT OF MAIN FINDINGS BY Stella Babalola Jean Karambizi Boubacar Sow John Bosco Ruzibuka Ministry of Health Ministry of Justice Johns Hopkins University National Population and Institutional Population Communication Office (ONAPO) Relations Services (JHU/PCS) USAID Cooperative Agreement No. CCP-A-00-96-900001-00 Strategic Objective 1 USAID/RWANDA-Democracy and Governance Contractor: Office National de la Population (ONAPO) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document reports the findings from the evaluation of the Gacaca promotional campaign in Rwanda. The Johns Hopkins University/Population Communication Services (JHU/PCS) provided technical assistance to the Ministry of Justice and Institutional Relations of the Republic of Rwanda to design, implement and evaluate the campaign. Funding for the project and this study came from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Many people worked tirelessly to make the implementation of the Gacaca promotional campaign and its evaluation a reality. David Awasum (JHU/PCS-Rwanda Country Director) and Jean Karambizi (Gacaca Co-ordinator) played a key role in the design and implementation of the campaign and provided valued support in the evaluation. Stella Babalola of the Research and Evaluation Division of JHU/CCP played a lead role in designing and implementing the evaluation plan, analyzing the data, and preparing this report. We are grateful to colleagues at JHU/CCP - Jane Brown, Esther Braud, Susan Krenn and others – who played a determinant role in the design and implementation of the Gacaca campaign. JHU/PCS warmly acknowledge the role of the research team at ONAPO, which under the able leadership of the Director, John Bosco Ruzibuka, helped to implement the follow-up survey, analyze the data and prepare this report.
    [Show full text]