DOCSLIB.ORG

Phylogenetics, Genome Size Evolution and Popula- Tion Genetics of Slipper Orchids in the Subfamily Cypri- Pedioideae (Orchidaceae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phylogenetics, Genome Size Evolution and Popula- Tion Genetics of Slipper Orchids in the Subfamily Cypri- Pedioideae (Orchidaceae) ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Phylogenetics, genome size evolution and popula- tion genetics of slipper orchids in the subfamily cypri- pedioideae (orchidaceae) https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40088/ Version: Full Version Citation: Chochai, Araya (2014) Phylogenetics, genome size evolu- tion and population genetics of slipper orchids in the subfamily cypri- pedioideae (orchidaceae). [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email Phylogenetics, genome size evolution and population genetics of slipper orchids in the subfamily Cypripedioideae (Orchidaceae) Thesis submitted by Araya Chochai For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Science Birkbeck, University of London and Genetic Section, Jodrell Laboratory Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew November, 2013 Declaration I hereby confirm that this thesis is my own work and the material from other sources used in this work has been appropriately and fully acknowledged. Araya Chochai London, November 2013 2 Abstract Slipper orchids (subfamily Cypripedioideae) comprise five genera; Paphiopedilum, Cypripedium, Phragmipedium, Selenipedium, and Mexipedium. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Paphiopedilum, were studied using nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid sequence data. The results confirm that Paphiopedilum is monophyletic and support the division of the genus into three subgenera Parvisepalum, Brachypetalum and Paphiopedilum. Four sections of subgenus Paphiopedilum (Pardalopetalum, Cochlopetalum, Paphiopedilum and Barbata) are recovered with strong support for monophyly, concurring with a recent infrageneric treatment. Section Coryopedilum is also recovered with low bootstrap but high posterior probability values. Relationships in Barbata remain unresolved, with short branch lengths and narrow geographical distributions suggesting it may have undergone rapid radiation. Genome sizes were measured for seven taxa in Paphiopedilum and chromosome and genome size data mapped onto the phylogenetic framework, showing no clear trend in increase in chromosome number in the genus. The diploid chromosome number of 2n = 26 in subgenera Parvisepalum and Brachypetalum suggests it is the ancestral condition, with higher chromosome numbers in Cochlopetalum and Barbata pointing to centric fission possibly having occurred independently in these sections. Although species in Barbata have larger genome sizes than other sections, any trend of genome size evolution remains unclear in the genus. Eight primer pairs for plastid microsatellites were designed from consensus sequences generated from different genera, most of them shown to be applicable across the subfamily. High levels of variation in allele size were observed at interspecific levels but at intraspecific level, low levels were observed in Cypripedium calceolus. The application of plastid microsatellites for population genetic analyses in C. calceolus was limited because few of them are polymorphic and low numbers of alleles were detected. Results were generally congruent with a previous study. Within the limits of this data, the plastid haplotype distribution of C. calceolus in western and northern Europe could indicate possible recolonisation routes from three main refugia, following glaciations. Size variation has also been detected in other species in some markers but sampling was sparse. 3 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely thank my supervisors, Dr Mike Fay and Dr Martin Ingrouille for their guidance, support and valuable advice over the duration of my PhD study. I would also like to express my gratitude to Dr Ilia Leitch for her advice and valuable comments. I am also deeply grateful to the staff of the Genetics and Molecular Systematics Sections at the Jodrell Laboratory, RBG Kew, especially, Dr James Clarkson, Dr Dion Devey, Dr Lola Lledó, Robyn Cowan, Laszlo Csiba, Edith Kapinos and Dr Ralf Kynast for their technical support in the laboratory and helpful advice whenever I came across problems. Thank you also to Christopher Ryan and Bala Kompalli (The Tropical Nursery RBG, Kew) for giving access to living plant collections and for generously letting me have the plant material. Many thanks to all of my friends during my study at the Jodrell, especially Jeff Joseph, Benedetta Bernardini, Jacqueline StQuinton, Charlie Harris, Matthew O'Reilly, Bhanubong Bongcheewin, Dr Michele Sanchez, Dr Harris Saslis-Lagudakis, Dr Jaume Pellicer, Dr Laura Kelly, Dr Cynthia Sothers, Dr Elizabeth Baloch, Dr Imalka Kahandawala and Dr Mehdi Zarrei for their advice, support and valuable help, it is deeply appreciated. Finally, I would like to say a heartfelt thank you to all of the members of my family for their encouragement, support and patience. I am sincerely grateful to my husband, Jon Shore, for being supportive, understanding and always standing by me through the good and particularly the difficult times. Without him I would not have come this far to write this page. 4 Table of Contents Declaration .................................................................................................................. 2 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... 4 Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 5 Index of Tables............................................................................................................ 8 Index of Figures .......................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1: General Introduction .............................................................................. 10 1.1 The Family Orchidaceae ....................................................................................... 10 1.2 Subfamily Cypripedioideae ................................................................................... 11 1.3 Conservation of the slipper orchid subfamily Cypripedioideae............................... 12 1.4 Genus Paphiopedilum ........................................................................................... 13 1.4.1 Taxonomic history of the genus Paphiopedilum...................................... 14 1.4.2 Ecology and distribution of Paphiopedilum ............................................. 22 1.5 Cypripedium calceolus .......................................................................................... 24 1.6 Phylogenetics and genome size evolution ............................................................ 24 1.7 Population genetics and plant conservation .......................................................... 26 1.8 Thesis structure .................................................................................................... 28 Chapter 2: Molecular phylogenetics of Paphiopedilum based on nuclear ribosomal ITS and plastid sequences ..................................................................... 29 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 29 2.1.1 Aims of this study ................................................................................... 31 2.2 Materials and methods .......................................................................................... 31 2.2.1 Plant materials........................................................................................ 31 2.2.2 DNA extraction ....................................................................................... 35 2.2.3 Amplification ........................................................................................... 35 2.2.4 Parsimony analysis................................................................................. 37 2.2.5 Bayesian analysis ................................................................................... 37 2.3 Results .................................................................................................................. 37 2.3.1 Alignment of data sets ............................................................................ 37 2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 43 2.4.1 Congruence of ITS and plastid data ....................................................... 43 2.4.2 Phylogenetic relationships in Paphiopedilum .......................................... 43 2.4.2.1 Subgenus Parvisepalum .......................................................... 43 2.4.2.2 Subgenus Brachypetalum ........................................................ 45 5 2.4.2.3 Subgenus Paphiopedilum ........................................................ 46 Chapter 3: Genome size and chromosome number evolution within the genus Paphiopedilum .......................................................................................................... 50 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 50 3.1.1 Aims of this study ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska with an Emphasis on Juneau
    Native Orchids in Southeast Alaska with an Emphasis on Juneau Marlin Bowles & Bob Armstrong 2019 Acknowledgements We are grateful to numerous people and agencies who provided essential assistance with this project. Carole Baker, Gilbette Blais, Kathy Hocker, John Hudson, Jenny McBride and Chris Miller helped locate and study many elusive species. Pam Bergeson, Ron Hanko, & Kris Larson for use of their photos. Ellen Carrlee provided access to the Juneau Botanical Club herbarium at the Alaska State Museum. The U.S. Forest Service Forestry Sciences Research Station at Juneau also provided access to its herbarium, and Glacier Bay National Park provided data on plant collections in its herbarium. Merrill Jensen assisted with plant resources at the Jensen-Olson Arboretum. Don Kurz, Jenny McBride, Lisa Wallace, and Mary Willson reviewed and vastly improved earlier versions of this book. About the Authors Marlin Bowles lives in Juneau, AK. He is a retired plant conservation biologist, formerly with the Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL. He has studied the distribution, ecology and reproductionof grassland orchids. Bob Armstrong has authored and co-authored several books about nature in Alaska. This book and many others are available for free as PDFs at https://www.naturebob.com He has worked in Alaska as a biologist, research supervisor and associate professor since 1960. Table of Contents Page The southeast Alaska archipellago . 1 The orchid plant family . 2 Characteristics of orchids . 3 Floral anatomy . 4 Sources of orchid information . 5 Orchid species groups . 6 Orchid habitats . Fairy Slippers . 9 Eastern - Calypso bulbosa var. americana Western - Calypso bulbosa var. occidentalis Lady’s Slippers .
    [Show full text]
  • UV Reflectance but No Evidence for Colour Mimicry in a Putative Brood-Deceptive Orchid Corybas Cheesemanii
    Current Zoology 60 (1): 104–113, 2014 UV reflectance but no evidence for colour mimicry in a putative brood-deceptive orchid Corybas cheesemanii M. M. KELLY, A. C. GASKETT* School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand Abstract Rewardless orchids attract pollinators by food, sexual, and brood-site mimicry, but other forms of sensory deception may also operate. Helmet orchids (Corybas, Nematoceras and related genera) are often assumed to be brood-site deceivers that mimic the colours and scents of mushrooms to fool female fungus gnats (Mycetophilidae) into attempting oviposition and polli- nating flowers. We sampled spectral reflectances and volatile odours of an endemic terrestrial New Zealand orchid Corybas cheesemanii, and co-occurring wild mushrooms. The orchid is scentless to humans and SPME GC-MS analyses did not detect any odours, but more sensitive methods may be required. The orchids reflected strongly across all visible wavelengths (300700nm) with peaks in the UV (~320nm), yellow-green (500600 nm) and red regions (650700 nm), whereas mushrooms and surrounding leaf litter reflected predominantly red and no UV. Rather than mimicking mushrooms, these orchids may attract pollinators by exploiting insects’ strong sensory bias for UV. Modelling spectral reflectances into a categorical fly vision model and a generic tetrachromat vision model provided very different results, but neither suggest any mimicry of mushrooms. However, these models require further assessment and data on fly spectral sensitivity to red wavelengths is lacking – a problem given the predominance of red, fly-pollinated flowers worldwide [Current Zoology 60 (1): 104113, 2014]. Keywords Diptera, Colour space, Fly pollination, Orchidaceae, Spectral reflectance, Visual modelling Flowers typically attract pollinators by advertising in the Orchidaceae, in which approximately one-third of rewards such as food (Chittka and Thompson, 2001; species do not reward their pollinators (Jersáková et al., Raguso, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination of the Lady's Slipper Cypripedium Henryi Rolfe
    Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 156, 491–499. With 2 figures Pollination of the lady’s slipper Cypripedium henryi Rolfe (Orchidaceae) PENG LI2,3, YI-BO LUO1,2*, YIN-XIA DENG2,4 and YONG KOU5 1The National Orchid Conservation Centre, Shenzhen 518114, Guangdong, China 2State Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China 3Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4Jilin Agriculture University, Changchun 130118, Jilin, China 5Huanglong Administration of National Scenic Spots, Huanglong 623300, Sichuan, China Received 2 November 2005; accepted for publication 22 October 2007 The pollination ecology of Cypripedium henryi Rolfe, a slipper orchid endemic to west China, was investigated, and its floral shape, size, colour, and scent were analysed. Examination of the breeding system suggests that the flowers are self-compatible, but need pollen vectors for successful reproduction. The flower is rewardless; over 15 insects belonging to Araneida, Hymenoptera, Diptera, Lepidoptera, and Coleoptera were recorded as flower visitors, but most only alighted or rested on the flower. In the total 32 h of observations over 2 years, female Lasioglossum bees were found to be the most frequent visitors and the only pollinators. They showed a high visitation frequency and, surprisingly, re-visited the same flowers frequently. Cypripedium henryi probably attracts pollinators visiting the flowers through general food deception (odour components, colour, false nectar guides), as well as special structures (slippery labellum, slippery staminode). Although three Lasioglossum species visited the flowers, only L. sauterum Fan et Ebmer was found with pollen. Lasioglossum flavohirtum Ebmer was large and climbed out from the entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Extrapolating Demography with Climate, Proximity and Phylogeny: Approach with Caution
    ! ∀#∀#∃ %& ∋(∀∀!∃ ∀)∗+∋ ,+−, ./ ∃ ∋∃ 0∋∀ /∋0 0 ∃0 . ∃0 1##23%−34 ∃−5 6 Extrapolating demography with climate, proximity and phylogeny: approach with caution Shaun R. Coutts1,2,3, Roberto Salguero-Gómez1,2,3,4, Anna M. Csergő3, Yvonne M. Buckley1,3 October 31, 2016 1. School of Biological Sciences. Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science. The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. 2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, UK. 3. School of Natural Sciences, Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. 4. Evolutionary Demography Laboratory. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Rostock, DE-18057, Germany. Keywords: COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, comparative demography, damping ratio, elasticity, matrix population model, phylogenetic analysis, population growth rate (λ), spatially lagged models Author statement: SRC developed the initial concept, performed the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. RSG helped develop the initial concept, provided code for deriving de- mographic metrics and phylogenetic analysis, and provided the matrix selection criteria. YMB helped develop the initial concept and advised on analysis. All authors made substantial contributions to editing the manuscript and further refining ideas and interpretations. 1 Distance and ancestry predict demography 2 ABSTRACT Plant population responses are key to understanding the effects of threats such as climate change and invasions. However, we lack demographic data for most species, and the data we have are often geographically aggregated. We determined to what extent existing data can be extrapolated to predict pop- ulation performance across larger sets of species and spatial areas. We used 550 matrix models, across 210 species, sourced from the COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database, to model how climate, geographic proximity and phylogeny predicted population performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Viability Analysis for the Clustered Lady’S Slipper ( Cypripedium Fasciculatum )
    Population Viability Analysis for the clustered lady’s slipper ( Cypripedium fasciculatum ) 2010 Progress Report Rachel E. Newton, Robert T. Massatti, Andrea S. Thorpe, and Thomas N. Kaye Institute for Applied Ecology A Cooperative Challenge Cost Share Project funded jointly by Bureau of Land Management, Medford District, and Institute for Applied Ecology, Corvallis, Oregon PREFACE This report is the result of a cooperative Challenge Cost Share project between the Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) and a federal agency. IAE is a non-profit organization dedicated to natural resource con- servation, research, and education. Our aim is to provide a service to public and private agencies and individuals by developing and communicating information on ecosystems, species, and effective management strategies and by conducting research, monitoring, and experiments. IAE offers educational opportunities through 3-4 month internships. Our current activities are concentrated on rare and endangered plants and invasive species. Questions regarding this report or IAE should be directed to: Andrea S. Thorpe Institute for Applied Ecology PO Box 2855 Corvallis, Oregon 97339-2855 phone: 541-753-3099, ext. 401 fax: 541-753-3098 email: [email protected], [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions and cooperation by the Medford District Bureau of Land Management, especially Mark Mousseaux. In 2010, work was supported by IAE staff: Michelle Allen, Andrew Dempsey-Karp, Geoff Gardner, Amanda Stanley, and Shell Whittington. Cover photograph : Clustered lady’s slipper ( Cypripedium fasciculatum ). Please cite this report as: Newton, R.E., R.T. Massatti, A.S. Thorpe, and T.N. Kaye. 2010. Population Viability Analysis for the clustered lady’s slipper ( Cypripedium fasciculatum ).
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Complete Chloroplast Genomes for Phylogenetic Studies
    Utilization of complete chloroplast genomes for phylogenetic studies Shairul Izan Binti Ramlee Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr R.G.F. Visser Professor of Plant Breeding Wageningen University Co-promotors Dr M.J.M. Smulders Senior researcher, Wageningen UR Plant Breeding Wageningen University & Research Dr T.J.A. Borm Researcher, Wageningen UR Plant Breeding Wageningen University & Research Other members Prof. Dr M.E. Schranz, Wageningen University Dr G.F. Sanchez Perez, Wageningen University Dr R. Vos, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden Dr R. van Velzen, Wageningen University This research was conducted under the auspices of the Graduate School of Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Utilization of complete chloroplast genomes for phylogenetic studies Shairul Izan Binti Ramlee Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 28 October 2016 at 11 a.m. in the Aula. Shairul Izan Binti Ramlee Utilization of complete chloroplast genomes for phylogenetic studies 186 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2016) With references, with summary in English ISBN: 978-94-6257-935-4 DOI: 10.18174/390196 Table of Contents Chapter 1: General Introduction………………………………………………………………...….1 Chapter 2: De novo assembly of complete chloroplast genomes from non-model species based on a k-mer frequency-based selection
    [Show full text]
  • Structuration Écologique Et Évolutive Des Symbioses Mycorhiziennes Des
    Universit´ede La R´eunion { Ecole´ doctorale Sciences Technologie Sant´e{ Facult´edes Sciences et des Technologies Structuration ´ecologique et ´evolutive des symbioses mycorhiziennes des orchid´ees tropicales Th`ese de doctorat pr´esent´eeet soutenue publiquement le 19 novembre 2010 pour l'obtention du grade de Docteur de l'Universit´ede la R´eunion (sp´ecialit´eBiologie des Populations et Ecologie)´ par Florent Martos Composition du jury Pr´esidente: Mme Pascale Besse, Professeur `al'Universit´ede La R´eunion Rapporteurs : Mme Marie-Louise Cariou, Directrice de recherche au CNRS de Gif-sur-Yvette M. Raymond Tremblay, Professeur `al'Universit´ede Porto Rico Examinatrice : Mme Pascale Besse, Professeur `al'Universit´ede La R´eunion Directeurs : M. Thierry Pailler, Ma^ıtre de conf´erences HDR `al'Universit´ede La R´eunion M. Marc-Andr´e Selosse, Professeur `al'Universit´ede Montpellier Laboratoire d'Ecologie´ Marine Institut de Recherche pour le D´eveloppement 2 R´esum´e Les plantes n'exploitent pas seules les nutriments du sol, mais d´ependent de champignons avec lesquels elles forment des symbioses mycorhiziennes dans leurs racines. C'est en particulier vrai pour les 25 000 esp`ecesd'orchid´eesactuelles qui d´ependent toutes de champignons mycorhiziens pour accomplir leur cycle de vie. Elles produisent des graines microscopiques qui n'ont pas les ressources nutritives pour germer, mais qui d´ependent de la pr´esencede partenaires ad´equatspour nourrir l'embryon (h´et´erotrophie)jusqu’`al'apparition des feuilles (autotrophie). Les myco- rhiziens restent pr´esents dans les racines des adultes o`uils contribuent `ala nutrition, ce qui permet d'´etudierplus facilement la diversit´edes symbiotes `al'aide des ou- tils g´en´etiques.Conscients des biais des ´etudesen faveur des r´egionstemp´er´ees, nous avons ´etudi´ela diversit´edes mycorhiziens d'orchid´eestropicales `aLa R´eunion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination and Comparative Reproductive Success of Lady’S Slipper Orchids Cypripedium Candidum , C
    POLLINATION AND COMPARATIVE REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF LADY’S SLIPPER ORCHIDS CYPRIPEDIUM CANDIDUM , C. PARVIFLORUM , AND THEIR HYBRIDS IN SOUTHERN MANITOBA by Melissa Anne Pearn A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Biological Sciences University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright 2012 by Melissa Pearn ABSTRACT I investigated how orchid biology, floral morphology, and diversity of surrounding floral and pollinator communities affected reproductive success and hybridization of Cypripedium candidum and C. parviflorum . Floral dimensions, including pollinator exit routes were smallest in C. candidum , largest in C. parviflorum , with hybrids intermediate and overlapping with both. This pattern was mirrored in the number of insect visitors, fruit set, and seed set. Exit route size seemed to restrict potential pollinators to a subset of visiting insects, which is consistent with reports from other rewardless orchids. Overlap among orchid taxa in morphology, pollinators, flowering phenology, and spatial distribution, may affect the frequency and direction of pollen transfer and hybridization. The composition and abundance of co-flowering rewarding plants seems to be important for maintaining pollinators in orchid populations. Comparisons with orchid fruit set indicated that individual co-flowering species may be facilitators or competitors for pollinator attention, affecting orchid reproductive success. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout my master’s research, I benefited from the help and support of many great people. I am especially grateful to my co-advisors Anne Worley and Bruce Ford, without whom this thesis would not have come to fruition. Their expertise, guidance, support, encouragement, and faith in me were invaluable in helping me reach my goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf of JHOS July 2013
    JJoouurrnnaall of the HHAARRDDYY OORRCCHHIIDD SSOOCCIIEETTYY Vol. 10 No. 3 (699) July 2013 JOURNAL of the HARDY ORCHID SOCIETY Vol. 10 No. 3 (69) July 2013 The Hardy Orchid Society Our aim is to promote interest in the study of Native European Orchids and those from similar temperate climates throughout the world. We cover such varied aspects as field study, cultivation and propagation, photography, taxonomy and systematics, and practical conservation. We welcome articles relating to any of these subjects, which will be considered for publication by the editorial committee. Please send your submissions to the Editor, and please structure your text according to the “Advice to Authors” (see website www.hardyorchidsociety.org.uk , January 2004 Journal, Members’ Handbook or contact the Editor). Views expressed in journal arti - cles are those of their author(s) and may not reflect those of HOS. The Hardy Orchid Society Committee President: Prof. Richard Bateman, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS Chairman: Celia Wright, The Windmill, Vennington, Westbury, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, SY5 9RG [email protected] Vice-Chairman: vacant Secretary: Richard Robinson, Rhiw, Church Street, Amberley, Sussex, BN18 9NF [email protected] Treasurer: John Wallington, 17, Springbank, Eversley Park Road, London, N21 1JH [email protected] Membership Secretary: Moira Tarrant, Bumbys, Fox Road, Mashbury, Chelmsford, CM1 4TJ [email protected] Plant Show Secretary: David Hughes, Linmoor Cottage, Highwood,
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species from Lao PDR
    A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species From Lao PDR A report for IUCN Lao PDR by Philip Thomas, Mark Newman Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa & Sounthone Ketphanh June 2006 A Review of CITES Appendices I and II Plant Species From Lao PDR A report for IUCN Lao PDR by Philip Thomas1 Dr Mark Newman1 Dr Bouakhaykhone Svengsuksa2 Mr Sounthone Ketphanh3 1 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2 National University of Lao PDR 3 Forest Research Center, National Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute, Lao PDR Supported by Darwin Initiative for the Survival of the Species Project 163-13-007 Cover illustration: Orchids and Cycads for sale near Gnommalat, Khammouane Province, Lao PDR, May 2006 (photo courtesy of Darwin Initiative) CONTENTS Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations used in this report Acknowledgements Summary _________________________________________________________________________ 1 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) - background ____________________________________________________________________ 1 Lao PDR and CITES ____________________________________________________________ 1 Review of Plant Species Listed Under CITES Appendix I and II ____________ 1 Results of the Review_______________________________________________________ 1 Comments _____________________________________________________________________ 3 1. CITES Listed Plants in Lao PDR ______________________________________________ 5 1.1 An Introduction to CITES and Appendices I, II and III_________________ 5 1.2 Current State of Knowledge of the
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021 ---International Rock Gardener--- March 2021
    International Rock Gardener ISSN 2053-7557 Number 135 The Scottish Rock Garden Club March 2021 ---International Rock Gardener--- March 2021 A month with our usual variety of plants, places and people - thanks to our contributors, we are able to bring this magazine free to all on the internet. Across the world there has been great frustration at the inability of late to travel and enjoy plants in the wild – Christopher (Chris) and Başak Gardner, planthunters, authors and organisers of Vira Natura Tours are hopeful, as are some others, of being able to resume tours soon. Meanwhile they have given us a whistle stop guide to the flowers of the Silk Road (ISBN-10: 1472969103 ISBN-13: 978-1472969101 – the subject of their substantial – and very beautiful – book, Flora of the Silk Road. The cover of their latest book, the Flora of the Mediterranean (ISBN-10: 1472970268 ISBN-13: 978-1472970268) is also shown below. Also this month: Wim Boens from Flanders appeals for assistance in the clarification of a long-running confusion over the correct identity of a fine old Colchicum cultivar. Can you help? From Chile, John and Anita Watson bring a change of rank for the infraspecific taxon of Mutisia subulata Ruiz & Pav. and also clarification of the species' differing morphology and its vertical distribution. Cover image: Omphalodes luciliae photo Chris Gardner. Vira Natura organises Botanical Holidays and Tours. www.srgc.net Charity registered in Scotland SC000942 ISSN 2053-7557 ---International Rock Gardener--- --- Plant Naming --- A change of rank for the infraspecific taxon of Mutisia subulata Ruiz & Pav.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidosaphes Chinensis Chamberlin: Chinese Mussel Scale Hemiptera: Diaspididae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: A
    CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGR I CULT URE ~ California Pest Rating Proposal Lepidosaphes chinensis Chamberlin: Chinese mussel scale Hemiptera: Diaspididae Current Rating: Q Proposed Rating: A Comment Period: 5/26/2021 – 7/10/2021 Initiating Event: Lepidosaphes chinensis is frequently intercepted in California on Dracaena plants from Florida, Ecuador, and Asia (China and Thailand). It was collected twice on orchids in Los Angeles County in 1934 and 1935 but it was since eradicated (Gill, 1997). It was also recently found in a nursery in Monterey County in 2011 (California Department of Food and Agriculture). It has not been rated. Therefore, a pest rating proposal is needed. History & Status: Background: The scale Lepidosaphes chinensis is reported to feed on plants in eight families: Arecaceae, Asparagaceae, Elaeagnaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Fabaceae, Magnoliaceae, Orchidaceae, and Pandanaceae (García Morales et al., 2016). Reported hosts Beaucarnea recurvata, Dracaena (including D. braunii, or lucky bamboo), Ficus, Sansevieriana trifasciata, and Yucca elephantipes (California Department of Food and Agriculture; Łabanowski, 2017; Suh and Bombay, 2015). Infestations are reported to cause chlorosis, necrosis, wilting, and black streaks, and heavy infestations cause the death of affected leaves (Malumphy et al., 2012; Stocks, 2014). No reports of economic damage were found, but it is apparent that the value of ornamental plants can be lowered, and this scale was deemed to have the potential to become a significant economic and ecological pest in Florida (Stocks, 2014). CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGR I CULT URE ~ Worldwide Distribution: Lepidosaphes chinensis is apparently native to eastern Asia, where it is reported from China, Hong Kong, Laos, Philippines, Singapore, Vietnam, Taiwan, and Thailand (Martin and Lau, 2011; García Morales et al., 2016; Suh and Bombay, 2015).
    [Show full text]