DOCSLIB.ORG

International Hop Growers Convention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Hop Growers Convention INTERNATIONAL HOP GROWERS’ CONVENTION ECONOMIC COMMISSION - SUMMARY REPORTS VIDEO-CALL NOVEMBER, 2020 International Hop Growers’ Convention IHGC - Economic Commission Summary Reports Video-Call - November 9, 2020 Hop Acreage 2019 Hop Production 2019 Alpha Hop Acreage 2020 Hop Production 2020 Alpha Country (Hectares, Ha) (in MT = 1.000 kg) acid (Hectares, Ha) (in MT = 1.000 kg) acid Prod. estimations estimations Prod. Aroma Alpha Hop area' New Total Aroma Alpha Total MT Aroma Alpha Hop area' New Total Aroma Alpha Total MT Argentina 118 56 174 0 174 188 78 266 23 127 59 186 11 186 230 101 331 28 Australia° 476 176 652 48 700 1 385 260 1 645 224 548 152 700 43 743 1 478 236 1 714 255 Austria 194 58 253 3 253 368 124 492 37 197 58 255 5 255 360 117 487 39 Belgium 124 58 182 0 182 172 124 296 24 124 58 182 0 182 154 122 276 21 Canada° 219 200 419 0 419 329 300 629 63 200 150 350 0 350 329 300 525 53 China° 400 2 283 2 683 0 2 683 544 6 500 7 044 600 360 2 000 2 360 0 2 360 544 6 500 7 044 600 Czech Republic 4 706 49 4 755 248 5 003 6 991 154 7 145 285 4 635 61 4 696 270 4 966 5 830 120 5 950 265 France 424 42 466 39 505 728 94 822 25 413 48 460 40 500 672 95 767 31 Germany 10 860 8 913 19 773 644 20 417 22 584 25 888 48 472 5 260 10 973 9 154 20 127 579 20 706 21 400 25 600 47 000 5 400 Japan° 53 53 106 0 106 82 120 202 25 53 53 106 0 106 82 120 202 25 New Zealand° 598 145 743 331 743 780 239 1 019 100 598 145 743 331 743 1 000 250 1 250 115 Poland 636 1 020 1 656 106 1 762 1 293 2 476 3 765 317 650 1 111 1 761 30 1 791 1 155 2 262 3 417 354 Romania 75 185 260 3 263 90 105 195 19 75 188 263 6 269 95 125 220 21 Russia° 168 74 242 12 254 200 150 350 20 168 74 242 12 254 200 150 350 20 Serbia° 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 16 2 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 16 2 Slovakia° 129 0 129 4 133 108 0 108 5 38 0 38 0 38 42 0 42 2 Slovenia 1 500 21 1 521 75 1 596 2 502 70 2 572 130 1 380 23 1 403 78 1 480 2 623 100 2 723 213 South Africa° 73 354 427 0 427 77 677 754 75 73 354 427 0 427 77 677 754 75 Spain 0 518 518 0 518 0 830 830 98 0 468 468 0 468 0 800 800 94 Ukraine° 309 60 369 0 369 400 80 480 30 309 60 369 0 369 400 80 480 30 UK–England 787 171 958 0 958 1 353 343 1 696 119 711 157 868 0 868 748 176 924 67 USA 18 005 5 842 23 847 468 23 847 35 160 16 115 51 275 5 755 19 682 5 272 24 954 1 107 24 954 35 516 12 522 48 038 6 075 IHGC 39 854 20 278 60 141 1 981 61 320 75 334 54 727 130 073 13 236 41 314 19 645 60 966 2 512 62 023 72 935 50 453 123 310 13 785 ° Since no country updates were available, figures from Video-Call in August 2020 were used. Difference ∑ 2020-2019 1 460 -633 825 531 703 -2 399 -4 274 -6 763 549 ' Acreage without new hop areas Difference ∑ 2020-2015 9 498 2 917 12 322 -2 330 11 468 27 425 9 780 37 127 5 878 Difference ∑ 2020-2010 17 001 -6 320 10 688 1 705 11 745 35 322 -12 472 22 772 3 923 tons 073 310 130 16 000 710 130 000 705 675 123 147 118 118 120 000 703 113 112 538 108 14 000 110 000 905 693 100 98 418 13 785 100 000 95 266 183 652 91 13 236 280 86 86 90 000 85 12 000 10 642 82 80 000 11 635 11 637 9 862 70 000 10 700 10 620 10 403 9 012 10 000 hectars, tons 60 000 8 044 8 019 50 000 9 397 8 000 40 000 6 612 7 907 30 000 58 806 60 184 61 320 62 023 51 550 56 160 55 592 51 030 54 723 49 721 47 691 46 003 46 970 50 555 6 000 20 000 45 758 10 000 0 4 000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020* acreage production alpha prod. * estimation International Hop Growers’ Convention Country: IHGC-Economic Committee: November 2020 - Video-Call Argentina Hop Area Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference (Ha = Hectares) 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 118 127 9 7,6 Alpha 56 59 3 5,4 Total 174 186 12 6,9 New Hop Area Year N-1 Year N 2020 (Ha) 2019 (estimate) Aroma 0 9 Alpha 0 2 Total 0 11 TOTAL Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference Hop Area (Ha) 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 118 127 9 7,6 Alpha 56 59 3 5,4 Total 174 186 12 6,9 Production Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference MT=Metric Tons 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 188 230 42 22,3 Difference accounts to poor yield due Alpha 78 101 23 29,5 to frosts. Estimation inc. Indep. Growers and Total 266 331 65 24,4 ABI Yield Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference MT/Ha 2019 (estimate) % Aroma 1,59 1,81 13,7 Alpha 1,39 1,71 22,9 Total 1,53 1,78 16,4 Difference accounts to poor yield due to frosts. Alpha Prod. Year N-1 2019 Year N 2020 Difference N-(N-1) Metric Tons Metric Tons Av. Contents Metric Tons Av. Contents Metric Tons Av. Contents % (estimate) % % Aroma 13,2 7,5 16,1 7,0 2,9 22,3 Alpha 9,4 12,5 12,1 12,0 2,8 29,5 Total 22,5 28,2 5,7 25,3 Main Year N-1 Year N Difference Year N-1 Year N Difference Varieties Total Total Alpha Alpha N-(N-1) (Ha = Hectares) Acreage Acreage % % Aroma Cascade 8 Willamette 11 Traful 8 Mapuche 7 Patagonia Red Brand 12 Nahuel 5 No precise public data available Alpha Nugget 12 Bullion 11 Victoria 13 No precise public data available International Hop Growers’ Convention Country: IHGC-Economic Committee: November 2020 - Video-Call Argentina Contract Year N Year N+1 Year N+2 Year N+3 Year N+4 Year N+5 Situation 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Metric tons % Crop / Year N Unsold Hops (MT) : Crop Year (N-1) 2019 Aroma Alpha Total = Unsold Hops % unsold Hops Hop Prices Year (N-2) Year (N-1) Year (N) % Diff. Kind of Price Euro / Kg 2018 2019 2020 N vs. (N-1) Spot Prices Aroma Hops n/d n/d 18-28 Premium Craft market* Alpha Hops 18-21,5 Premium Craft market* Average Price Contract Prices Aroma Hops 13,5 ABI Alpha Hops 13,5 ABI Average Price 13,5 ABI Average Prices Aroma Hops Alpha Hops AVERAGE * Depending on grower/processor and quality. CHART OF HOP CROPS 2006 - 2020* tons 400 45 40 350 331 35 300 280 266 28 30 250 25 215 23 25 200 22 20 hectars, tons hectars, 150 15 100 186 10 N/A 160 174 50 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 acreage production alpha prod. COMMENTS ON HOP PRODUCTION AND MARKET SITUATION / ORGANIC HOPS No significant commercial production Year N-1 Year N 2020 Main O-varieties O-Hop Area (Ha) n/a n/a O-Production (MT) n/a n/a Argentina, Nov 2nd 2020 Member Organization(s): LEIBRECHT A. International Hop Growers’ Convention Country: IHGC-Economic Committee: November 2020 - Video-Call Austria Hop Area Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference (Ha = Hectares) 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 194 197 3 1,3 Alpha 58 58 0 0,0 Total 253 255 2,5 1,0 New Hop Area Year N-1 Year N 2020 (Ha) 2019 (estimate) Aroma 2,5 5 Alpha 0 0 Total 2,5 5 TOTAL Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference Hop Area (Ha) 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 194 197 3 1,3 Alpha 58 58 0 0,0 Total 253 255 3 1,0 Production Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference Difference MT=Metric Tons 2019 (estimate) N - (N-1) % Aroma 368 360 -8 -2,2 Alpha 124 117 -7 -5,6 Total 492 487 -5 -1,0 Yield Year N-1 Year N 2020 Difference MT/Ha 2019 (estimate) % Aroma 1,89 1,83 -3,4 Alpha 2,13 2,01 -5,6 Total 1,95 1,91 -2,0 Alpha Prod.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Direct Analysis of Hops by Leaf Spray and Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-2012 Direct Analysis of Hops by Leaf Spray and Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry Kari Blain Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Blain, Kari, "Direct Analysis of Hops by Leaf Spray and Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry" (2012). Master's Theses. 100. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/100 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIRECT ANALYSIS OF HOPS BY LEAF SPRAY AND PAPER SPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY Kari Blain, M.S. Western Michigan University, 2012 The objective of this research is to develop a new and innovative method of hops analysis, which is much faster than standard testing methods, as well as reduce the amount of consumables and solvent used. A detailed discussion on the development of an ambient ionization mass spectrometry method called paper spray (PS-MS) and leaf spray (LS-MS) mass spectrometry will be presented. This research investigates the use of PS-MS and LS-MS techniques to determine the α- and β- acids present in hops. PS-MS and LS-MS provide a fast way to analyze hops samples by delivering data as rapidly as a UV-Vis measurement while providing information similar to lengthy liquid chromatographic separations. The preliminary results shown here indicate that PS-MS could be used to determine cohumulone and α/β ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phased, Diploid Assembly of the Cascade Hop (Humulus Lupulus) Genome Reveals Patterns of Selection and Haplotype Variation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/786145; this version posted September 28, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A phased, diploid assembly of the Cascade hop (Humulus lupulus) genome reveals patterns of selection and haplotype variation Lillian K. Padgitt-Cobb1, Sarah B. Kingan2, Jackson Wells3, Justin Elser6, Brent Kronmiller3, Daniel Moore4, Gregory Concepcion2, Paul Peluso2, David Rank2, Pankaj Jaiswal6, John Henning4*, David A. Hendrix1,5* 1 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Oregon State University 2 Pacific Biosciences of California, 3 CGRB, Oregon State University 4 USDA ARS 5 School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University 6 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University * to whom correspondence should be addressed: [email protected], [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/786145; this version posted September 28, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Hop (Humulus lupulus L. var Lupulus) is a diploid, dioecious plant with a history of cultivation spanning more than one thousand years. Hop cones are valued for their use in brewing, and around the world, hop has been used in traditional medicine to treat a variety of ailments.
    [Show full text]
  • Hops – a Guide for New Growers 2017
    Hops – a guide for new growers 2017 growers new – a guide for Hops Hops a guide for new growers FIRST EDITION 2017 first edition 2017 Author: Kevin Dodds www.dpi.nsw.gov.au Hops a guide for new growers Kevin Dodds Development Officer – Temperate Fruits NSW Department of Primary industries ©NSW Department of Primary Industries 2017 Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries, a part of NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose, provided that you attribute NSW Department of Industry, Skills and Regional Development as the owner. However, you must obtain permission if you wish to charge others for access to the publication (other than at cost); include the publication advertising or a product for sale; modify the publication; or republish the publication on a website. You may freely link to the publication on a departmental website. First published March 2017 ISBN print: 978‑1‑76058‑007‑0 web: 978‑1‑76058‑008‑7 Always read the label Users of agricultural chemical products must always read the Job number 14293 label and any permit before using the product and strictly comply with the directions on the label and the conditions of Author any permit. Users are not absolved from any compliance with Kevin Dodds, Development Officer Temperate Fruits the directions on the label or the conditions of the permit NSW Department of Primary Industries by reason of any statement made or omitted to be made in 64 Fitzroy Street TUMUT NSW 2720 this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Crp 305 Crop Genetics and Breeding
    CRP 305 CROP GENETICS AND BREEDING NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA 1 COURSE CODE: CRP 305 COURSE TITLE: CROPS GENETICS AND BREEDING COURSE DEVELOPER: COURSE WRITER: PROFESSOR LATEEF LEKAN BELLO DEPARTMENT OF PLANT BREEDING AND SEED SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE MAKURDI BENUE STATE COURSE EDITOR: COURSE CO-ORDINATOR: 2 COURSE GUIDE CRP 305 CROP GENETICS AND BREEDING 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction What you will learn in this course Course Aims Course Objectives Course Requirements Course Materials Study Units Textbooks and References Assessment Tutor Marked Assignment Final Examination and Grading Summary 4 INTRODUCTION CRP 305 Crop Genetics and Breeding is a one semester two (2) credit units course designed for undergraduate students in 300 Level. The course consists of three major parts, with five modules and eighteen 18 units. In writing this study guide, I have given primary consideration to the students‟ background. It has been assumed that students usually enroll in the crop genetics and breeding course after they have completed courses in botany, genetics statistics and other related courses in agriculture. WHAT YOU WILL LEARN IN THIS COURSE CRP 305 – Crop genetics and breeding consists of five major components arranged in modules. The first module which is on crop genetics and breeding will introduce you to the concept of what: a. Crop breeding is, and the purpose is suppose to serve. b. Plant cell concepts, gene symbols which will help you to understand Mendel‟s experiments and Law of Inheritance. c. Differences between qualitative and quantitative traits constitute. The study in the second module: You shall learn about heritability and selection responses.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran ______
    CHAPTER 4 _____________________________________________________________________ PLANT BREEDING David Luckett and Gerald Halloran _____________________________________________________________________ WHAT IS PLANT BREEDING AND WHY DO IT? Plant breeding, or crop genetic improvement, is the production of new, improved crop varieties for use by farmers. The new variety may have higher yield, improved grain quality, increased disease resistance, or be less prone to lodging. Ideally, it will have a new combination of attributes which are significantly better than the varieties already available. The new variety will be a new combination of genes which the plant breeder has put together from those available in the gene pool of that species. It may contain only genes already existing in other varieties of the same crop, or it may contain genes from other distant plant relatives, or genes from unrelated organisms inserted by biotechnological means. The breeder will have employed a range of techniques to produce the new variety. The new gene combination will have been chosen after the breeder first created, and then eliminated, thousands of others of poorer performance. This chapter is concerned with describing some of the more important genetic principles that define how plant breeding occurs and the techniques breeders use. Plant breeding is time-consuming and costly. It typically takes more than ten years for a variety to proceed from the initial breeding stages through to commercial release. An established breeding program with clear aims and reasonable resources will produce a new variety regularly, every couple of years or so. Each variety will be an incremental improvement upon older varieties or may, in rarer circumstances, be a quantum improvement due to some novel gene, the use of some new technique or a response to a new pest or disease.
    [Show full text]
  • QTL Mapping of Powdery Mildew Susceptibility in Hop (Humulus Lupulus L.)
    QTL mapping of powdery mildew susceptibility in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) John A. Henning, M. Shaun Townsend, David H. Gent, Nahla Bassil, Paul Matthews, Emily Buck & Ron Beatson Euphytica International Journal of Plant Breeding ISSN 0014-2336 Volume 180 Number 3 Euphytica (2011) 180:411-420 DOI 10.1007/ s10681-011-0403-4 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Euphytica (2011) 180:411–420 DOI 10.1007/s10681-011-0403-4 QTL mapping of powdery mildew susceptibility in hop (Humulus lupulus L.) John A. Henning • M. Shaun Townsend • David H. Gent • Nahla Bassil • Paul Matthews • Emily Buck • Ron Beatson Received: 13 October 2010 / Accepted: 28 February 2011 / Published online: 15 March 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011 Abstract Hop powdery mildew [Podosphaera mac- was extracted, purified and analyzed via three ularis (Wallr.) U. Braun & S. Takam.] is best different marker systems. Analysis of the resulting controlled via the production of resistant varieties. markers was based upon the ‘‘two-way pseudo- Recent evidence supports selection against plant testcross’’ procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of Using Diploid by Tetraploid Crosses to Obtain Triploid Hops
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jeanine Streeter De Noma for the degree of Master of Science in Crop Science presented on November 4, 1994. Title: The Feasibility of Using Diploid by Tetraploid Crosses to Obtain Triploid Hops (Humulus lupulus L.) Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: r. Alfred Haunold The hop (Humulus lupulus L.) is a dioecious, diploid (2n=2x=20) species. Triploid hops (2n=3x=30) are easily obtained from tetraploid by diploid crosses and are preferred because of their natural seedlessness and increased vigor. The female inflorescence is used for flavoring beer. Because brewers require product consistency, the brewing characteristics of a new aroma-type hop must closely match the variety it is intended to replace while showing improved adaptation and agronomic traits. Since triploid offspring should more closely resemble the tetraploid parent from which they receive two-thirds of their genetic material, breeders have traditionally selected known varieties to be the tetraploid parent with the expectation this will increase the likelihood of obtaining progeny with similar brewing chemistry. Tetraploid female parents are obtained through colchicine treatment of desirable diploid varieties. Naturally occurring tetraploid seedlings, sometimes found among the offspring of tetraploid by diploid crosses, if suitable for breeding, could eliminate the tedious colchicine treatment process now used to obtain tetraploids. Two such tetraploid males were obtained from an Oregon cross in 1983. Since these two tetraploid males had attractive quality traits similar to other males in the USDA germplasm collection with a proven history of producing aroma-type progeny, they were thought to be suitable for use in a polyploid breeding program for aroma hops.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Hop Commission Hop Growers of America Hop Growers Of
    Washington Hop Commission Hop Growers of America Hop Growers of Washington US Hop Industry Plant Protection Committee >>> 2018 KEY EVENTS <<< BREWCON (Sydney, Australia) Annual Meeting & JUN American Hop Convention, Hop Growers of America TU Berlin 26-28 CBC (Palm Desert, CA) (Berlin, Germany) (Nashville, TN) JAN APR 30 JUN 24-26 - MAY 3 5 JUN 6 MAR 7-8 MAY Doemens Brewing JAN School Seminar Hill visits in D.C. w/ BA & HRC 18 (Munich, Germany) 5 (Washington, D.C.) Annual Meeting, Hop Growers of Washington (Yakima) IHGC Executive Commiee (Paris, France) A Look Back at 2018 In an effort to demonstrate to members what is being done on their behalf throughout the year, Washington Hop Commission staff have put together this report to communicate a com- prehensive Annual Report for work done for all of the organizations they work on behalf of: the Washington Hop Commission, Hop Growers of America, Hop Growers of Washington, and the U.S. Hop Industry Plant Protection Commiee. As many efforts benefit multiple parties, we have not sectioned this off by organization, but the report has been organized by different themes – International Markets, Technical & Regu- latory work, Staff & Office Changes, etc. 2 CERIA (Brussels, Belgium) Heriot-Wa Brewing School Seminar (Edinburgh, Scotland) OCT Eastern Europe 12 Cra Brewing Seminar NOV (Prague, Czech Republic) 6 JUL IHGC 31 NOV Executive Commiee (Nurem- OCT 7 berg, Germany) IHGC 24-27 Executive Commiee (Leon, Spain) NOV Warsaw Beer Festival 12 (Warsaw, Poland) NOV 8 NOV Weihenstephan TUM Brewing 13-15 School Seminar (Munich, Germany) BrauBeviale, Trade Show & Tasting Seminar Contents: (Nuremburg, Germany) INFRASTRUCTURE .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • My Brewery Experience
    Multi-award-winning magazine of the Bristol & District and Bath & Borders branches of CAMRA, the Campaign for Real Ale No. 115 Autumn 2017 PINTS WEST My Brewery Experience Day Contents Page 22 BADRAG (rare ales group) Page 24 Bath & Borders pub news Snuffy Jack’s Ale House Page 28 Bath Winter Ales Festival Page 46 Bristol Beer Week Page 34 Bristol Pubs Group off to a flying start Page 51 CAMRA diaries & contacts Page 42 CAMRA Good Beer Guide ristol’s third micropub – Snuffy Jack’s Ale House in Fishponds – INTS WES Page 48 CAMRA ladies opened at noon on the 24th June 2017 and has instantly proven Page 49 CAMRA young(ish) members Breally popular, building up a good level of trade and many P T Page 44 Champion Beer of Britain regular customers, despite a high number of other pubs and bars The multi-award-winning magazine of the Bristol & District Page 10 My brewery experience day nearby. The building was previously Osbournes Stationers and then a branch of CAMRA, the Campaign for Real Ale, plus the Bath Page 41 Portishead short-lived firework shop. & Borders branch Page 32 Shine on Westbury-on-Trym Brought to you entirely by unpaid volunteers Page 45 Toulouse The name relates to a former head miller at the nearby Snuff Mills. Ten thousand copies of Pints West are distributed free to Co-owners Johnny Fallon (on the right in the middle photo) from Page 3 Snuffy Jack’s micropub Manchester and Dave Sibley from Northampton met in the Royal Navy hundreds of pubs in and around the cities of Bristol and Bath Page 39 Weston-super-Mare news many years ago and have now settled in Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barth-Report
    THE BARTH-REPORT HOPS 2017/2018 CONTENTS Publishing details 2 Poland 20 World market basic data 2 England 21 Foreword 3 France 21 Political situation 4 European Union 5 Country reports 2017 crop/America Economic situation 6 USA 22 Top 40 breweries 7 Beer output development 8 Country reports 2017 crop/Asia World beer production 2016/2017 9 China 27 Hop varieties – International standard 10 Hop alpha acid production 10 Country reports 2018 crop/Australia/Oceania Alpha acid balance 11 Australia 28 Market analysis 12 Hop forward contract rates 13 Hop plant development 2018 28 Development 2006 – 2017 13 Outlook 2018 29 World hop acreage and crop 2016/2017 14 Key data (USA, China, Japan, Germany) 30 Country reports 2017 crop/Europe Currency exchange rates 30 Germany 15 Conversion table weights and measures 30 Czech Republic 18 Members of the Barth-Haas Group 31 Slovenia 19 Hop Flavourist Course 32 PUBLISHING DETAILS Publisher: Joh. Barth & Sohn GmbH & Co KG, Layout: Lingner Marketing GmbH, Fuerth Freiligrathstrasse 7/9, 90482 Nuremberg Cover: Lingner Marketing GmbH, Fuerth Project responsibility: Stephan J. Barth, Print: Pinsker Druck und Medien GmbH, Mainburg Managing Partner, Nuremberg Editor: Heinrich Meier, Georgensgmuend Nuremberg, July 2018 WORLD MARKET BASIC DATA Hop area under Hop production Hop alpha production Beer production cultivation in ha in mt in mt in m hl 118,401 112,125 11,248 1,951 1,952 58,739 56,137 10,533 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 9.0 % 4.6 % 28.3 % 5.6 % 35.7 % 6.8 % -0.5 % 0.1 % Hops 17/18 2 FOREWORD Hop Esperanto – a common aroma language for hops Hops delight brewers and beer drinkers in equal Both the stimuli and the impressions triggered can be measure! And this passion among those obsessed classified, even if the approaches so far have tended to with hops to discover and brew all the aromas and be less than satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2019 Vol
    50635 FCB PROOF_LoResPDF 1 10_29_2019 TM La portraitA of livingND & working in ruralS AmericaC APEwinterS 2019 50635 FCB PROOF_LoResPDF 1 10_29_2019 LANDSCAPES Winter 2019 Vol. 22, No. 2 Ag New Mexico Brett Valentine, CEO Contributing Editor: agnewmexico.com Chi Robb AgTexas FCS Tim McDonald, CEO Contributing Editor: agtexas.com Carolyn Brand Alabama Ag Credit Douglas Thiessen, CEO Contributing Editors: alabamaagcredit.com Amber Pratt/Brooklyn George Alabama Farm Credit Mel Koller, CEO Contributing Editors: alabamafarmcredit.com Wendy Tysinger Samantha Southerland Capital Farm Credit Ben R. Novosad, CEO Contributing Editor: capitalfarmcredit.com Tanya Foerster Central Texas Farm Credit Boyd Chambers, CEO Contributing Editor: ranchmoney.com Jennifer Spraberry Legacy Ag Credit Derrell Chapman, CEO Contributing Editor: legacyaca.com Amy Rayzor Lone Star Ag Credit William Melton, Interim CEO Contributing Editor: lonestaragcredit.com Karen Doskocil Louisiana Land Bank Stephen Austin, CEO Contributing Editor: louisianalandbank.com Tyra Knight Mississippi Land Bank Craig B. Shideler, CEO Contributing Editor: mslandbank.com Jessica Smith Plains Land Bank Gregg Lloyd, CEO Contributing Editor: plainslandbank.com Shandi Russell Southern AgCredit Joe Hayman, CEO Contributing Editor: southernagcredit.com Lylla Joe Texas Farm Credit Mark Miller, CEO Contributing Editors: texasfcs.com Ivory Good/Kacy Land CONTRIBUTORS Writers: Katrina Huffstutler, Mark Johnson, Sheryl Smith- Rodgers Photographers: Gary Clark, Larry Ditto, Debra Ferguson/ Southern Images, Brooklyn George, Mark Johnson, Al Key, Terry O’Neal, Shannon Richardson, Zach Ryall, Patty Stewart, Jeff Tesney, Laurie Tolboom-Martin Landscapes is distributed free to Texas Farm Credit District Gary Clark customers and friends. To change your address, send your old address label and your new address to Landscapes, Farm Credit MAGAZINE STAFF Bank of Texas, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • HOPS in the HOME GARDEN Leonard Cicerello and Kim Wilson, UC Master Gardeners
    HOPS IN THE HOME GARDEN Leonard Cicerello and Kim Wilson, UC Master Gardeners Hops in the Home Garden Hop (Humulus lupulus) is a perennial deciduous climbing plant grown for its cone shaped flowers which are used in beer brewing. The Pacific Northwest leads the country in the commercial production of hops with 99% of the country’s hops grown in Washington, Idaho and Oregon. 53,000 acres of hops were harvested nationwide in 2017 (USDA) with only 130 acres from California. There is renewed interest in hop farming in California due to the current popularity of local craft beer and hoppy beer varieties. Photo credit: UCANR The Hop Plant The hop plant is technically a bine not a vine since it climbs with the aid of stiff hooked hairs on its stem. It is dioecious, meaning it has separate male and female plants. Only the mature flowers or cones from the female plant contain lupulin glands with the acids valued in beer brewing. Male plants are not necessary for cone production in female plants. They can grow 4- 10 inches/day, up to 18-25 feet in a season. The plants have a pine-like aroma and can live 20 to 35 years. Varieties There are hundreds of hop varieties worldwide. Hops are classified as bittering, aromatic or landscape varieties. Choose the cultivar based on its intended use. Bittering hops have higher levels of alpha acids imparting bitterness to the beer. Bittering cultivars include: Chinook, Columbus, Nugget, Sorace Ace. Aromatic hops give beers their unique aroma and flavor. Examples include: Cascade, Centennial, Fuggle, Mt Hood, Willamette.
    [Show full text]