DOCSLIB.ORG

1 - Centre Stage and Our Debate Underway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 - Centre Stage and Our Debate Underway Munk Debate on the US Election September 30, 2016 Rudyard Griffiths: This is the heart of downtown Toronto, a city that is home to more than six million people, the skyline carved in the waters of Lake Ontario and here we are, everyone, at Roy Thomson Hall. Its distinctive exterior design, we know it well, reflective by day, transparent by night. This is Toronto’s premier concert hall. It’s a venue usually for the biggest names in entertainment, but tonight before 3,000 people the latest in a series of Munk Debates, a clash of ideas over the US presidential election. Good evening, my name is Rudyard Griffiths and it is once again my pleasure to be your moderator tonight for this debate, this important debate. I want to start by welcoming the North American wide television audience tuning in right now C-SPAN across the continental US and here in Canada coast to coast on CPAC. A warm hello also to the online audience watching right now; Facebook Live streaming this debate over facebook.com, our social media partner, on the websites of our digital and print partner theglobeandmail.com and, of course, on our own website themunkdebates.com and a hello to all of you, the 3,000 people who have once again filled Roy Thomson Hall to capacity. Bravo. Our ability year in and year out, debate in and debate out to bring to you some of the world’s best debaters, some of the brightest minds, the sharpest thinkers to weigh in on the big global challenges, issues and problems facing the world would not be possible without the generosity, the foresight and the commitment of our host tonight. So join me in a warm appreciation of Munk Debate founders Peter and Melanie Munk. Bravo, you guys. Thank you. It’s a real treat to be able to host these debates in Toronto and let’s do that right now. Let’s get our two teams of debaters out here - 1 - centre stage and our debate underway. We’ve got a controversial motion. It’s designed to fire up our participants and fire up the online television and in auditorium audience. That resolution: “Be it resolved, Donald Trump can make America great again...” Speaking for the motion, our first debater tonight, please welcome the former speaker of the US House of Representatives and an advisor to the Trump campaign, Newt Gingrich. Speaker Gingrich’s teammate is a bestselling author, renowned radio broadcaster with over five million daily listeners coast to coast in the United States and she’s a force of nature in the American conservative movement, ladies and gentlemen, Laura Ingraham. Wow, one great team of debaters deserves another and we have not disappointed you tonight. Speaking against the resolution “Be it resolved, Donald Trump can make America great again...” is the former US Labour Secretary, acclaimed Berkley professor, filmmaker, author and one of the most formidable debaters of his time, Robert Reich. Robert’s debating partner, Canadian born, two-time governor of the State of Michigan and the co-chair of Hillary Clinton’s White House transition team, please join me in a warm Canadian welcome to Jennifer Granholm. Let’s go through a very quick pre-debate checklist before we go to our opening statements. First, we’ve got a hashtag going tonight. Those in the hall, those watching online, hashtag Munk Debate. Let us know what you think. Join the debate, join the conversation, take part in our rolling poll also at munkdebates.com\vote and, of course, our countdown clock for those of you who are regulars of the debate this is how we keep our debaters on their toes and our debates on time. We have a clock that will appear as the debaters’ opening and closing remarks count down to zero join me in a round of applause - 2 - and that will let them know that it’s time to move on. We like to do that here and we like to keep our proceedings moving quickly. Let’s finally review how this audience of 3,000 people here in Roy Thomson Hall voted on tonight’s resolution coming into the debate. It’s downtown Toronto, Canada. I’m curious here. There are some closet Trump supporters. Let’s find out. “Be it resolved, Donald Trump can make America great again …” Do you agree or disagree? Let’s see those numbers up on the screen now. Okay. Fourteen percent. Fourteen percent agree, 86 percent disagree. Now, as we ask at every vote because hey, look, you can change your mind, you’re going to hear a lot in the next hour and a half, there’s some compelling arguments here back and forth so depending on what you hear are you likely to change your vote over the next hour and a half. Let’s have those numbers now please. Okay, look at that. This debate’s in play; 46 percent of you could change your mind, 54 percent are decided, but let’s just see how decided you are. We’re going to begin with our opening statements now. I’m going to call on Speaker Gingrich. Your six minutes begins now. Newt Gingrich: Well, first of all, thank you all for coming out and I want to thank Peter Munk for creating a remarkable institution. I was here a few years ago with Secretary Rice to debate economics and it was really a great experience. This is one of the great debates in the entire North America and so I’m delighted to be back and have a chance to talk with you. Now, you might have thought that Laura and I would be put on edge by an 86 to 14 vote, but actually if you operated as a conservative, even the Washington media, that would be actually a reasonably good ratio. So it doesn’t particularly affect us. And I also want to draw a distinction. I would not have agreed to come here if the - 3 - question had been resolved that Canadians should relax and not worry about a Donald Trump presidency. I think Trump represents very real change. I think he will aggressively put America’s interest first and I think, frankly, from the standpoint of any other country that has to raise issues because that’s a very different frame of reference than the way we’ve negotiated over the last couple of generations and sets up a lot of questions which aren’t answered and can’t be answered until we live through it. But what I would suggest to you is in the long run a very dynamic America that regains a Reagan level of economic growth, four, five, six percent a year. An America that is generating jobs and generating rapidly advancing income and an America which overhauls its infrastructure and an America which fundamentally reforms its civil service is in fact a better neighbour, a better customer, a better market to sell into and a better support for national security than an America which continues to decay. And I think part of what you don’t feel in Canada is the degree to which the American central government system is decaying. Example: We learned last week that in the veteran’s administration one-third of the calls to the suicide line go to call waiting so you can leave a message. Now just think about that. You’re a veteran. You’re depressed. You’re literally thinking about suicide. It’s two in the morning. You call a number you’ve been told will help you and one out of three times you get a tape recording. I mean this is a government level of incompetence that is beyond breathtaking and you see it again and again in our system. You look at your infrastructure. We are now $19 trillion in debt and large parts of infrastructure don’t work and there has to be a profound overhaul of our ability to compete in the world market. The director of national intelligence reported – staff report earlier this year that the Chinese last year stole $360 billion in intellectual property from the United States. We have an $800 billion trade - 4 - deficit. You can’t sustain that. And you also can’t talk about free trade when your largest trading partner or your second largest trading partner is stealing a third of a trillion dollars a year intellectual properties. And so the requirement to rethink and restructure. Finally, the whole issue of the war in the Middle East. It has been 37 years since the Ayatollah Khomeini illegally seized the American Embassy beginning Iran’s campaign against the United States. It has been 15 years since 9/11 when Islamic supremacists killed 3,000 people in the United States. We’re not winning. We have spent trillions of dollars, lost thousands of young men and women, had tens of thousands of severe wounds and no serious person can argue we’re winning. And so when Trump says we need to rethink these things, I would argue that he’s not glib. He’s not a Yale trained lawyer. He hasn’t spent 46 years in public life like Secretary Clinton, but as a crude, rough and tumble businessman who had a habit of actually building things and making them work and having projects. I think he has the entrepreneurial drive. I think he has the courage and I think he has the force of originality that will enable us to start to break through and to literally make America great again.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Michael Cohen
    Copyright © 2020 by Michael Cohen All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without the express written consent of the publisher, except in the case of brief excerpts in critical reviews or articles. All inquiries should be addressed to Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018. Skyhorse Publishing books may be purchased in bulk at special discounts for sales promotion, corporate gifts, fund-raising, or educational purposes. Special editions can also be created to specifications. For details, contact the Special Sales Department, Skyhorse Publishing, 307 West 36th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018 or [email protected]. Skyhorse® and Skyhorse Publishing® are registered trademarks of Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.®, a Delaware corporation. Visit our website at www.skyhorsepublishing.com. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available on file. ISBN: 978-1-5107-6469-9 eBook: 978-1-5107-6470-5 Cover design by Brian Peterson Cover photographs by Getty Images All interior photos © 2020 Michael Cohen Printed in the United States of America Dedication I dedicate this book to the love of my life, my wife Laura, and to my wonderful children, Samantha and Jake. The three of you endured so much during my years with Donald Trump and in the years since then. You have been subjected to harassment, insults and threats; you have seen me get arrested and charged and put in prison (twice). But the deepest suffering must have come as you watched me play an active role in the despicable acts of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Infrastructure That Matters Most.Indd
    The Infrastructure that Matters Most: The Need for Investment in Canada’s Trade Infrastructure June 2016 to Shape Policy & the Power of our network This report was made possible by the generous support of our sponsors This report was produced in cooperation with This report has been prepared by John Law. John is the President of Lawmark International and a key contributor to the trade and infrastructure debate and policy making process in Canada. He has served as the President of the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) and Chair of the Canadian Council of Deputy Ministers responsible for Transportation and Infrastructure. John is the former CEO of the Global Transportation Hub and served as Saskatchewan’s Deputy Minister of Transportation and Infrastructure. The author extends his thanks to Jody Eckert and Chandra Mark for their research support, and to Carlo Dade and Ryan Greer for their editorial contributions. In addition, the author wishes to recognize the input of the participants at the September, 2015 Canada West Foundation – Canadian Chamber of Commerce private sector Roundtable on Trade Infrastructure and Supply Chains in Toronto and the advice of senior offi cials at Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 Section 1: Transportation Infrastructure and our Economic Livelihood 5 Section 2: Five Reasons to Make Trade Infrastructure an Investment Priority 8 Section 3: A Strategic Focus for the Next Generation of Trade Infrastructure 23 Section 4: Recommendations 27 Sources and References 29 INTRODUCTION What follows is an argument for enhanced trade only if our transportation network can enable the infrastructure investment, not simply as a reliable delivery of the goods.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debates Launches Second Season of Aclaimed Radio Program Dedicated to Civil and Substantive Debate
    MUNK DEBATES LAUNCHES SECOND SEASON OF ACLAIMED RADIO PROGRAM DEDICATED TO CIVIL AND SUBSTANTIVE DEBATE 40 weekly original one-on-one debates will explore the big issues of our time Debaters include David Brooks, Julianne Malveaux, Rahm Emanuel, Mehdi Hasan, Bret Stephens, Kimberley Strassel, Samantha Power, Alondra Cano, and many more Toronto, Canada (July 1, 2020) – The Munk Debates, one of the world’s leading forums for top thinkers to debate the pressing issues of our time, today announced the launch of the second season of its weekly radio program and podcast featuring civil and substantive one-on-one debate. The second season programming will tackle the critical issues of day from U.S.-China tensions, to the future of democracy, to the fallout of the 2020 US elections. Starting July 2020, Season Two consists of 40 episodes – one each week through June 2021— including audio versions of classic main stage Debates featuring Christopher Hitchens, Henry Kissinger, Maureen Dowd, Malcom Gladwell and many more. “We are living in a politically charged and socially divisive time, where we have largely forgotten the art of public debate," says Rudyard Griffiths, organizer and moderator, Munk Debates. "By convening smart and civil debate on challenging topics, our podcast not only helps people understand the issues driving public debate, it fosters the informed and respectful conversations we urgently need to be having." Like the iconic main stage Munk Debates in Toronto that regularly draw over 3000 attendees, its eponymous radio program and podcast features two debaters with sharply different points of view going head-to-head on a compelling topic.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 RESOURCE TOOLKIT a Guide for Canadian Planners and Urbanists
    COVID-19 RESOURCE TOOLKIT A Guide for Canadian Planners and Urbanists November, 2020 Updated April, 2021 © Lorenzo TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE 4 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES 5 AGE-FRIENDLY PLANNING 12 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 22 COMMUNITY DESIGN 29 DENSITY 40 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 44 ENVIRONMENT & CLIMATE CHANGE 60 EQUITY & SOCIAL JUSTICE 68 FOOD SYSTEMS 90 HOUSING & HOUSELESSNESS 94 INDIGENOUS ISSUES 109 MAIN STREETS 117 PUBLIC SPACES 123 RESILIENCY 134 RESPONSES & ACTIONS 141 RURAL & NORTHERN ISSUES 147 SMART CITIES & TECHNOLOGY 155 TRANSPORTATION 159 URBAN ISSUES 180 WORK SPACES 201 2 FOREWORD In 2019 no one could foresee that a year later entire countries would be shut down to curb the spread of a highly contagious virus. When the gravity of the COVID-19 pandemic became clear in March 2020, Canada, like many other nations, imposed strict “lockdown” measures on almost all sectors of society. Overnight, most Canadians became confined to their homes. Office buildings, malls, streets, public spaces and airports emptied. Only essential services, such as grocery stores, pharmacies, and gas stations, were allowed to operate under strict “physical distancing” conditions. As our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) grew and lockdown measures persisted for several weeks and months, glaring inefficiencies in community design started to become unignorable. Our response to challenges that had previously been inadequately addressed - multimodal transportation, a high-quality public realm, age-friendly and accessible planning, for example - have now become essential precursors for the creation of a resilient post-pandemic world. Conversations on the future of cities have become commonplace in mainstream society, and some of the best and brightest minds in the planning profession have made valuable contributions to this discourse.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debate on Populism
    Munk Debate on Populism November 2, 2018 Rudyard Griffiths: Good evening. Thank you for being here for the Munk Debate on Populism. My name is Rudyard Griffiths and it’s my privilege to have the opportunity to organize this debate series and to once again to act as your moderator. I want to start tonight’s proceedings by welcoming the North American-wide television and radio audience tuning into this debate, everywhere from CPAC, Canada’s public affairs channel, to C-SPAN across the continental United States, to CBC Radio, Ideas. A warm hello also to our online audience who’s watching this debate right now via our social media partner, Facebook, on Facebook Live, and on the Munk Debate website www.munkdebates.com. And finally, hello to you, the over 2,800 people and counting — who braved some protests tonight — to be here in his hall for this important debate on this vital subject. All of us at the Munk Debates thank you for standing up for substantive serious conversation on the big issues changing our world. Thank you. Bravo. Thank you also to the Aurea Foundation who has the courage to support this series year-in and year-out for over a decade. Let’s have a warm round of applause for the Munk Family and the late, and great, Peter Munk! Tonight’s debate is happening — we all know — just days before these critical mid-term elections, and it will tackle one of the most important issues facing the Western world: the rise of populist politics. We’re going to ask tonight, from these two debaters, to answer some important questions.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Global Paradigm
    A New Global Paradigm: Understanding the Transnational Progressive Movement, the Energy Transition and the Great Transformation Strangling Alberta’s Petroleum Industry A Report for Commissioner Steve Allan Anti-Alberta Energy Public Inquiry Dr T.L. Nemeth April 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ 2 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 2 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 II. Background/Context ................................................................................................. 5 III. Transnational Progressive Movement..................................................................... 12 A. Definitions .............................................................................................................. 12 B. Climate Change Rationale for Revolution .............................................................. 17 C. Global Energy Transition ........................................................................................ 27 i. Divestment/Transforming Financial Industry ............................................. 31 ii. The Future of Hydrocarbons ....................................................................... 40 IV. Groups Involved.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Be It Resolved, the Future of Western Politics Is Populist Not Liberal
    SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED BE IT RESOLVED, THE FUTURE OF WESTERN POLITICS IS POPULIST NOT LIBERAL Stephen K. Bannon and David Frum convene in Toronto to debate the future of populist politics September 5, 2018 – Toronto, Canada The Munk Debates announced today the resolution for the 23rd semi-annual event, to be held in Toronto on Friday, November 2nd, 2018. The Autumn 2018 Munk Debate will move the motion: Be it resolved, the future of western politics is populist not liberal. Throughout the Western world, politics is undergoing a sea-change. Long-held notions of the role of government, trade and economic policy, foreign policy and immigration are being successfully challenged by populist-oriented thinkers and movements. Does this surging populist agenda in Western nations signal a permanent shift in our politics? Or, is it passing phenomenon that will remain at the fringes of society and political power? In short, will our politics we be shaped by the liberal consensus on trade, national identity and global affairs or by insurgent populist politics, parties and leaders? Arguing for the resolution will be Stephen K. Bannon, former chief strategist for Donald J. Trump and one of the world’s most well-known populist thinkers and campaigners. Bannon emerged on the public scene in 2016 as the Executive Chairman of the conservative website Breitbart, helping shape many of the populist policies that delivered Trump to the U.S. Presidency, and went on to hold various senior roles in the White House. He is a former Naval officer, Goldman Sachs M&A banker, and graduate of Harvard Business School.
    [Show full text]
  • Munk Debate on China Airs June 18 on WNED-TV Is China a Threat to the Liberal International Order?
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WNED ǀ WBFO Media Contact: Munk Debates Media Contact: Heather Hare Sherry Naylor Director, Corporate Communications Naylor and Associates (716) 845.7155 • [email protected] (416) 368.8253 • [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Wednesday, June 12, 2019 Munk Debate on China Airs June 18 on WNED-TV Is China a threat to the liberal international order? Tickets to the Munk Debates in Toronto can sell out in just 15 minutes, but WNED-TV viewers don’t need to leave their living rooms to catch the latest debate on China and its impact on the world. “China: Friend or Foe?” airs at 10 pm Tuesday, June 18, on WNED-TV, with renowned panelists H.R. McMaster and Michael Pillsbury arguing one side and Kishore Mahbubani and Huiyao Wang arguing the other. Rudyard Griffiths is the organizer and moderator. The Munk Debates, now in its 11th year, are held twice a year in Toronto and tackle major policy issues, such as whether American foreign policy emboldens terrorists, whether men are obsolete, and whether religion is a force for good in the world. The Munk Debates are Canada’s preeminent forum to discuss the pressing issues of our time. Previous Munk Debate participants are a who’s who of world influencers, including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon, and David Frum. The motion for the Spring 2019 Munk Debate, held May 9: is China a threat to the liberal international order? Arguing for the resolution is H.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Semi-Annual Munk Debate Announced
    SEVENTH SEMI-ANNUAL MUNK DEBATE ANNOUNCED ST “DOES THE 21 CENTURY BELONG TO CHINA?” — Former U.S. Secretary of State, Dr. Henry Kissinger, joins high powered group to debate key geopolitical issue of the coming century — Thursday, May 5, 2011 – Toronto, Canada The Aurea Foundation announced today the resolution and presenters for the seventh semi•annual Munk Debate, to be held in Toronto on Friday June 17th. To encourage public debate of the geopolitical issue of our time, the seventh semi-annual Munk Debate will table the motion: be it resolved, the 21st century will belong to China. Is China’s rise unstoppable? Powered by the human capital of 1.3 billion citizens, the latest technological advances, and a comparatively efficient system of state-directed capitalism, China seems poised to become the global super power in the coming century. But the Middle Kingdom also faces a series of challenges. From energy scarcity to environmental degradation to political unrest to growing global security burdens, a host of factors could derail China’s global ascent. Arguing for the resolution will be Niall Ferguson, one of the world’s leading historians, internationally-acclaimed author, and a prolific commentator on contemporary economics and politics. He will be joined by David Daokui Li of the Tsinghua University School of Economics and Management in Beijing. Dr. Li is an academic member of the monetary policy committee of the central bank of China. Speaking against the resolution, is Henry Kissinger, the 56th Secretary of State of the United States from 1973 to 1977 and one of the world’s most influential commentators on geopolitics.
    [Show full text]
  • Geesin Mollan Trump and Trumpism FINAL
    University of Dundee Donald Trump and Trumpism Mollan, Simon; Geesin, Beverly Published in: Organization DOI: 10.1177/1350508419870901 Publication date: 2020 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Mollan, S., & Geesin, B. (2020). Donald Trump and Trumpism: Leadership, ideology and narrative of the business executive turned politician. Organization, 27(3), 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508419870901 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 26. Sep. 2021 Donald Trump and Trumpism: leadership, ideology and narrative of the business executive turned politician During the latter stages of the 2016 American election campaign, libertarian billionaire Peter Theil claimed that Americans supportive of Donald Trump's candidacy–including himself–were taking Trump 'seriously but not literally' (Yarow, 2016), which implied that those opposed to Trump's candidacy took him literally but not seriously.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Message Structure, Political Ideology and Time on Audience
    Running Head: SEEING IS PERCEIVING 1 Seeing is Perceiving: The Influence of Message Structure, Political Ideology and Time on Audience Perceptions of Televised Presidential Debates Robert H. Wicks, Professor, Department of Communication Patrick Stewart, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science Austin D. Eubanks, Doctoral Student, Department of Psychological Science Scott Eidelman, Associate Professor, Department of Psychological Science J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 Corresponding Author: Robert H. Wicks e-mail: [email protected] 479-575-5958 (office) 479-466-6564 (cell) Paper presented at the International Conference on The U.S. Elections of 2016: Domestic and International Aspects, Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy & Strategy, Herzliya, Israel, January 8 – 9, 2017. Running Head: SEEING IS PERCEIVING 2 Abstract This study explores how presentation style (i.e., content and message structure), predispositions (i.e., ideology) and overall exposure (i.e., time) may influence perceptions of Presidential candidates during the 2016 general election debates. A natural experiment was conducted in which college students watched the first televised Presidential debate between Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican nominee Donald Trump during the fall of 2016. Participants were randomly assigned to one of seven broadcast channel/media conditions (i.e., ABC, CNN, C-SPAN, Fox News, MSNBC, PBS and NPR). A pretest-posttest experimental design was employed to determine if perceptions of candidates changed based on media condition. Participants rated the candidates using a feeling thermometer along with 19 personal traits. Findings did not reveal a difference based upon medium. The results suggest that favorability toward both candidates generally increased after viewing a debate when controlling for political ideology (i.e., liberal or conservative).
    [Show full text]
  • View Profiles of MPP Class of 2021
    Candidate Profiles MCaasntedr oidf Pautbelic PPorloicyfiles MClasste orf o2f0 P2u1blic Policy Class of 2019 Candidate List Student Profiles Master of Public Policy Class of 2021 Page 3 Wahaj Alam Page 40 Kenza Mirza Page 4 Omar Ali Page 41 Jordan Morello Page 5 Mitchell Anderson Page 42 Sarah Mungal Page 6 Nicholas Baccala Page 43 Emma Murray Page 7 Stephanie Bertolo Page 44 Anandu Nair Page 8 Pam Bialik Page 45 Jennifer Oduro Page 9 Hannah Bourret Page 46 Maegan Ong Page 10 Julianna Campo Page 47 John Mark Padillo Page 11 Haobo Chen Page 48 Joanna Irene Patsakos Page 12 Suelan Chong Kit Page 49 Rhoda Akuol Philip Page 13 Erin Christensen Page 50 Erika Porco Page 14 An-Noura Compaoré Page 51 Aateka Rajab Page 15 Matt Condie Page 52 Jessica Kristen Rapson Page 16 John David Connolly Page 53 Haley Roberts Page 17 Duncan Cooper Page 54 Harshita Sandhu Page 18 Kayla Daneal Page 55 Nerissa Sarawan Page 19 Emilie De Monte Page 56 Iris Seo Page 20 Fatemah Ebrahim Page 57 Irene Shan Page 21 Pavlina Faltynek Page 58 Reem Sheikh-Khalil Page 22 Salman Faruqi Page 59 Melissa Slauenwhite Page 23 Karishma Firdausi Page 60 Joanne Soares Page 24 Danielle Foppiano Page 61 Emma Syron Page 25 Katie Gongjun Gao Page 62 Sara Szot Page 26 Steven Giallelis Page 63 Nicholas Thompson Page 27 Manny Gill Page 64 Andrew Train Page 28 Julia Gonsalves Page 65 Shannon Vocino Page 29 Szymon Grabowski Page 66 Anastasia Volkov Page 30 Alison Kessler Page 67 Andrea Vovk Page 31 Mahnoor Khan Page 68 Rishika Wadehra Page 32 Thea Koper Page 69 Helen Walsh Page 33 Jeanne Lee
    [Show full text]