Parliament to Abolish Paragraph 175. They Organized Thousands of Public Lectures Held

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliament to Abolish Paragraph 175. They Organized Thousands of Public Lectures Held Although prejudice and legal discrimination against homosexuals existed prior to Hitler’s rise to power, Nazi authorities embraced a particularly virulent form of homophobia which aimed to eradicate homosexuality from German society. Homosexuals became prime targets of Nazi persecution almost immediately after Hitler took office on January 30, 1933. The Nazis condemned homosexual activity as "socially aberrant" behavior and viewed homosexuality as a crime of degeneracy. Along with other targeted groups—criminals, vagrants, the disabled, and the insane—homosexuals were labeled as "asocial" degenerates who posed a threat to the health and survival of the Aryan race. Background When the German Empire was adopting a unified criminal code, the expert opinion was delivered by the Royal Prussian Scientific Deputation for Medical Affairs . Under the leadership of Rudolf Virchow, they stated that “…we are not in a position to offer any reasons why…those between two males should be punishable by law.” However, in May 1870, the Reichstag approved the new criminal code, which included Paragraph 175, which continued to penalize homosexuality with imprisonment. The German Empire thus wrote in legislation against homosexuality. The 1871 Reich Criminal Code’s Paragraph 175 outlawed homosexual acts, but was vague in its definition of what those acts were. The so-called anti-sodomy law declared “unnatural indecency” between men to be “punishable by imprisonment” for up to two years. The law did not define “indecency” nor made mention of homosexual acts between women. The only clarity came in 1877 when the German Supreme Court of Justice defined “unnatural indecency” as an “intercourse-like act,” but this still left a wide room for interpretation. Up until 1935, only penetrative intercourse (anal or oral) would bring a court conviction, with other acts, including mutual masturbation, being permitted. But this law wasn’t truly enforced, as Berlin had an open and flourishing gay community that made it one of Europe’s great cultural centers. During the Weimar Republic, the government did not pay much attention to the law. As a result numerous gay bars and over 30 gay magazines and journals were active in Germany. By the early 1930s, some 350,000 homosexual men and women lived among Berlin’s four million inhabitants. In the whole of Germany there are believed to have been around four million homosexuals at the time. The Scientific Humanitarian Committee In May 1897 in Berlin, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee was formed as the first gay rights organization. The Committee not only provided support for others but also committed itself to the political struggle for gay equality. Its two leading founders and organizers were publisher Max Spohr and the physician Magnus Hirschfeld. The Committee aimed to undertake research to defend the rights of homosexuals and to repeal Paragraph 175. Homosexuals were offered legal and medical advice, as well as representation in court. But it was essentially a political group that lobbied the German parliament to abolish Paragraph 175. They organized thousands of public lectures held throughout Germany, published and distributed informational pamphlets, wrote newspaper and magazine articles, and by 1907 they managed to gather over 6,000 signatures from prominent Germans for a petition to overturn Paragraph 175, including Albert Einstein, Hermann Hesse, and Thomas Mann. Adolf Brand, though, was more radical. He began to publish the world’s first gay magazine, Der Eigene ( “the peculiar”), in 1898. Its subject was gay art and gay life, but Brand also was willing to use the publication to “out” well-known politicians who publicly proclaimed anti-gay positions while privately practicing homosexuality. In 1904, he claimed in print that Friedrich Dasbach, a member of the Reichstag, consorted with male prostitutes. Brand went so far as to publish a leaflet in 1907 claiming that German Chancellor Franz von Bulow was a homosexual. To support his publication, and as a symbol of his disagreement with the Scientific Humanitarian Committee, Brand founded the group Gemeinschaft der Eigenen (Community of its Own) in 1903 as a private club of authors and artists. Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, meanwhile, set up the Institute of Sexual Science in Berlin in 1919 for studying homosexuality. He became known as the "Einstein of Sex" for his pioneering work in the field of sexual science. He conducted many studies on homosexuality to prove it was not abnormal. Hirschfeld aimed to make people conscious of their sexuality and allow people to live their sexual lives as they wanted, not just according to rules that were dictated by society, and thus argued that homosexuality was “neither an illness nor a crime.” In 1929, Hirschfeld said, “I do not cultivate and propagate homosexuality. I only open the eyes of those who are homosexually inclined about themselves and endeavor to struggle against their social ostracization.” Hirschfeld also wrote and directed a film entitled Different from the Others (1919), which explicitly pleaded for tolerance. Different from the Others set the standard for liberal tolerance for homosexuals. Showings of Hirschfeld's film were regularly disrupted by the fascists. In one such incident in Vienna in 1923 they shot and wounded several members of the audience. Hirschfled decided to take his public awareness informational tour abroad. From 1930 - 1932 he traveled around the world, introducing the new science of sexology in public lectures from New York and San Francisco to Tokyo, Shanghai, Manila, Calcutta, Cairo, Tel Aviv, and Athens. But the largest homosexual organization was the League of Human Rights, which was started in 1923 by Friedrich Radszuweit. By 1929, the League had over 48,000 members. Like the Committee, it became involved in the campaign against Paragraph 175. Rise of the Nazis But as Hitler’s Nazi party was gaining strength in the late 1920s, opposition to homosexuals increased. In May 1928, a Nazi Party response said: “[The] German nation... can only fight if it maintains its masculinity. It can only maintain its masculinity if it exercises discipline, especially in matters of love. Free love and deviance are undisciplined. Therefore, we reject you, as we reject anything which hurts our people. Anyone who even thinks of homosexual love is our enemy. We reject anything which emasculates our people and makes them a plaything for our enemies.... We therefore reject any form of unnatural sexuality, above all homosexuality.” Wilhelm Frick, Nazi Party deputy to the Reichstag, added in 1929, “Our view…is that these §175 people…should be prosecuted with all severity because such vices will lead to the downfall of the German nation.” When Hitler took over in January 1933, persecution of homosexuals became policy. They set upon dismantling the gay subculture of Berlin in a broad attack on “public indecency.” Nearly 100 clubs and cafes, political organizations, publishing houses, and bookshops were closed down by the police or forced to dissolve themselves. In February 1933, during the “Campaign for a Clean Reich,” the first decrees were issued against gay and lesbian bars, gay organizations, and publications and scholarly works about homosexuality. On May 6, 1933, Nazi student groups and sympathizers ransacked Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sexology, Berlin's most visible symbol of sexual reform. Four days later, on May 10 th , much of the institute's unique library was destroyed as part of a public book burning in Berlin to destroy the "un–German spirit." Hirschfeld himself saw the destruction of his life's work in a newsreel in a Paris movie theater. The institute was closed and reopened as a Nazi office building. Hirschfeld, then in Paris at the end of a three–year world tour, became an exile as his German citizenship was revoked. Unable to return to Germany, he died in French exile in Nice. His Scientific–Humanitarian Committee and other sexual rights organizations stopped their work in Germany. German men who, the state asserted, carried a "degeneracy" that threatened the "disciplined masculinity" of Germany. Hitler believed that homosexuality was "degenerate behavior" that threatened the "masculine discipline” of the German nation. Gay men were denounced as "antisocial parasites" and as "enemies of the state," and charged with corrupting public morality. As an “infection,” it was also feared that it could become an “epidemic,” especially within the all-male Nazi Party and armed forces and among Germany’s male youth, which pedophiles were said target. Homosexuality was also accused of being a factor in the declining birthrate that threatened to leave Germany unable to sustain itself. Homosexuality, the Nazis charged, weakened Germany in several ways. It was accused of being a factor in the declining birthrate that threatened to leave the nation unable to sustain itself. National strength depended on the growth of the German population, but since World War I, German birthrates had been declining, due in part to the deaths of two million men in the war. Heinrich Himmler, SS chief, said, “Roughly 7-8% of men in Germany are homosexual. If that’s how things remain, our nation will fall to pieces because of that plague. Those who practice homosexuality deprive Germany of the children they owe her.” It was also feared as an "infection" that could become an "epidemic," particularly among the nation's vulnerable youth. It was thought that it could give rise to a dangerous state– within–the–state since homosexuals were believed to form self–serving groups. It endangered public morality and contributed to the decline of the community. Therefore, for the good of the state, the Nazis asserted, homosexuality had to be eradicated. Rudolf Diels, the founder of the Gestapo, in 1934 lectured his colleagues on how homosexuals had caused the downfall of ancient Greece. He recorded some of Hitler's personal thoughts on the subject: "He lectured me on the role of homosexuality in history and politics.
Recommended publications
  • MICROCOSM: Portrait of a European City Major Disturbance
    In Breslau, the overthrow of the imperial authorities passed off without MICROCOSM: Portrait of a European City major disturbance. On 8 November, a Loyal Appeal for the citizens to uphold by Norman Davies (pp. 326-379) their duties to the Kaiser was distributed in the names of the Lord Mayor, Paul Matting, Archbishop Bertram and others. But it had no great effect. The Commander of the VI Army Corps, General Pfeil, was in no mood for a fight. Breslau before and during the Second World War He released the political prisoners, ordered his men to leave their barracks, 1918-45 and, in the last order of the military administration, gave permission to the Social Democrats to hold a rally in the Jahrhunderthalle. The next afternoon, a The politics of interwar Germany passed through three distinct phases. In group of dissident airmen arrived from their base at Brieg (Brzeg). Their arrival 1918-20, anarchy spread far and wide in the wake of the collapse of the spurred the formation of 'soldiers' councils' (that is, Soviets) in several military German Empire. Between 1919 and 1933, the Weimar Republic re-established units and of a 100-strong Committee of Public Safety by the municipal leaders. stability, then lost it. And from 1933 onwards, Hitler's 'Third Reich' took an The Army Commander was greatly relieved to resign his powers. ever firmer hold. Events in Breslau, as in all German cities, reflected each of The Volksrat, or 'People's Council', was formed on 9 November 1918, from the phases in turn. Social Democrats, union leaders, Liberals and the Catholic Centre Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Cr^Ltxj
    THE NAZI BLOOD PURGE OF 1934 APPRCWBD": \r H M^jor Professor 7 lOLi Minor Professor •n p-Kairman of the DeparCTieflat. of History / cr^LtxJ~<2^ Dean oiTKe Graduate School IV Burkholder, Vaughn, The Nazi Blood Purge of 1934. Master of Arts, History, August, 1972, 147 pp., appendix, bibliography, 160 titles. This thesis deals with the problem of determining the reasons behind the purge conducted by various high officials in the Nazi regime on June 30-July 2, 1934. Adolf Hitler, Hermann Goring, SS leader Heinrich Himmler, and others used the purge to eliminate a sizable and influential segment of the SA leadership, under the pretext that this group was planning a coup against the Hitler regime. Also eliminated during the purge were sundry political opponents and personal rivals. Therefore, to explain Hitler's actions, one must determine whether or not there was a planned putsch against him at that time. Although party and official government documents relating to the purge were ordered destroyed by Hermann GcTring, certain materials in this category were used. Especially helpful were the Nuremberg trial records; Documents on British Foreign Policy, 1919-1939; Documents on German Foreign Policy, 1918-1945; and Foreign Relations of the United States, Diplomatic Papers, 1934. Also, first-hand accounts, contem- porary reports and essays, and analytical reports of a /1J-14 secondary nature were used in researching this topic. Many memoirs, written by people in a position to observe these events, were used as well as the reports of the American, British, and French ambassadors in the German capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Domniemane I Rzeczywiste Kontakty Prominentów Nazistowskich Z Polskością Przed 1933 Rokiem
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS WRATISLAVIENSIS No 3749 Studia nad Autorytaryzmem i Totalitaryzmem 38, nr 2 Wrocław 2016 DOI: 10.19195/2300-7249.38.2.3 WOJCIECH KAPICA Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Warszawa Domniemane i rzeczywiste kontakty prominentów nazistowskich z polskością przed 1933 rokiem Niezwykle interesująca problematyka stosunku Hitlera i narodowych socja- listów do Polski i Polaków znalazła odbicie w rzetelnych pracach rodzimych ba- daczy (J.W. Borejsza, T. Szarota, E.C. Król, H. Orłowski)1. Chciałbym się skupić w niniejszym skromnym przyczynku na kontaktach, „spotkaniach” prominen- tów nazistowskich (choć jest to „nieostry” termin)2 z szeroko pojętą polskością (Polska, a właściwie ziemie polskie3, Polacy, kultura polska) przed „Machtüber- nahme”, tj. przed 30 stycznia 1933 roku. Niniejsze rozważania absolutnie nie 1 J.W. Borejsza, Antyslawizm Adolfa Hitlera, Warszawa 1988; idem, Śmieszne sto milionów Słowian: wokół światopoglądu Adolfa Hitlera, Warszawa 2006; T. Szarota, Niemcy i Polacy. Wza- jemne postrzeganie i stereotypy, Warszawa 1996; E.C. Król, Polska i Polacy w propagandzie naro- dowego socjalizmu w Niemczech 1919–1945, Warszawa 2006; H. Orłowski, Polnische Wirtshchaft. Nowoczesny niemiecki dyskurs o Polsce, Olsztyn 1998. 2 Za prominentów nazistowskich uznaję w tym przypadku nazistowskich posłów do Reichsta- gu (Mitglieder des Großdeutschen Reichstags) oraz „dębowców” SS i SA, tj. wszystkich wyższych oficerów od SS-Standartenführera i SA-Standartenführera wzwyż. Mam naturalnie świadomość „fasadowego” charakteru Reichstagu w Niemczech (podobnie zresztą było w Związku Sowiec- kim) — mówiono o nim jako o najdrożej na świecie opłacanym „chórze”. Podstawę tej skromnej analizy stanowią biogramy posłów do Reichstagu zamieszczone w specjalnych wydawnictwach poświęconych tej instytucji, zob. Reichstag-Handbuch VI. Wahlperiode 1932, Berlin 1932; Reichs- tag-Handbuch IX.
    [Show full text]
  • German Captured Documents Collection
    German Captured Documents Collection A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Allan Teichroew, Fred Bauman, Karen Stuart, and other Manuscript Division Staff with the assistance of David Morris and Alex Sorenson Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2011 Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Finding aid encoded by Library of Congress Manuscript Division, 2011 Finding aid URL: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms011148 Latest revision: 2012 October Collection Summary Title: German Captured Documents Collection Span Dates: 1766-1945 ID No.: MSS22160 Extent: 249,600 items ; 51 containers plus 3 oversize ; 20.5 linear feet ; 508 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in German with some English and French Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: German documents captured by American military forces after World War II consisting largely of Nazi Party materials, German government and military records, files of several German officials, and some quasi-governmental records. Much of the material is microfilm of originals returned to Germany. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog. They are grouped by name of person or organization, by subject or location, and by occupation and listed alphabetically therein. People Wiedemann, Fritz, b. 1891. Fritz Wiedemann papers. Organizations Akademie für Deutsches Recht (Germany) Allgemeiner Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund. Deutsches Ausland-Institut. Eher-Verlag. Archiv. Germany. Auswärtiges Amt. Germany. Reichskanzlei. Germany. Reichsministerium für die Besetzten Ostgebiete. Germany. Reichsministerium für Rüstung und Kriegsproduktion. Germany. Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Z Dziejów NSDAP Okręgu Śląskiego 1929-1932
    Sobótka 1978 1 FRANCISZEK BIAŁY Z DZIEJOW NSDAP OKRĘGU ŚLĄSKIEGO 1929-1932 Światowemu kryzysowi gospodarczemu towarzys·zył w Niemczech kryzys polityczny. W związku z zaostrzeniem się sprzeczności między masami pracującymi a kapitałem następowało wyraźne przesuwanie się sil politycznych na prawo. Szczególną aktywność w tych latach przejawiać zaczęła partia nazistowska, która do swych celów propagandowych wyko­ rzystywała trudności występujące w życiu gospodarczym i społecznym republiki. W latach wielkiego kryzysu gospodarczego NSDAP przeżywała burzli­ ;y rozwój. W 1928 r. liczyła ona 108 tys. członków, w 1930 r. ju� 389 tys. W kwietniu 1932 r. do partii wstąpił mihonowy członek, pod koniec zaś tego roku partia nazistowska w swych szeregach skupiała 1 414 tys. osób 1. W ciągu pięciu lat (1928-1932) liczba członków NSDAP wzrosła dwu­ dziestokro,tnie. Był to wzrost, który nie miał precedensu w dziejach ugrupowań politycznych Niemiec. Popularność hitlerowców wś·ród znacznych odłamów społeczeństwa niemieckiego ujawniła się podczas kolejnych wyborów do sejmów kra­ jowych i Parlamentu Rzeszy. Prawdziwym triumfem NSDAP zakończyły się wybory do Parlamentu Rzeszy w dniu 14 IX 1930 r. Przy ·stosunkowo wysokiej frekwencji wyborczej, wynoszącej 820/o głosów, na listę tej partii głosowało 6 406 tys., tj. 18,30/o wyborców. Partia hitlerowska otrzy­ mała 107 mandatów. Paismo sukcesów ciągnęło się dalej 2• W wyborach do Parlamentu Rzeszy w dniu 6 XI 1932 r. naziści zdobyli 33,1 O/o głosów i 196 mandatów. Duży odsetek głosów ot�zymała partia nazistowska w wyborach do organów samorządowych. 1 H. V o 1 z, Daten der Geschichte der NSDAP, Berlin-Leipzig 1939, s. 21; G. Ru h 1 e, Das Dritte Reich.
    [Show full text]
  • Die SA – Bürgerkriegsarmee Und Massenorganisation
    Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung –Gesellschaftsanalyse und Politische Bildung - Seminarmaterialien Die SA – Bürgerkriegsarmee und Massenorganisation des deutschen Faschismus Dr. Reiner Zilkenat, November 2004 1 Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung –Gesellschaftsanalyse und Politische Bildung - Seminarmaterialien Die Geschichte des deutschen Faschismus ist aufs engste mit den 1920 gegründeten „Sturmabteilungen“ (SA) verknüpft. Sie waren es, die vor allem in der Zeit der Weimarer Republik, nicht zuletzt auch bei ausländischen Beobachtern, das Bild vom deutschen Faschismus prägten. Ein Bild, das gekennzeichnet war von hemmungsloser Gewaltanwendung gegenüber politischen Gegnern, einer Gewaltanwendung, die selbstverständlich auch den Mord ins Kalkül zog. Von Beginn an befanden sich Juden im Visier der SA. Vor allem der zum 1. November 1926 von Adolf Hitler eingesetzte Berliner Gauleiter, der damals neunundzwanzigjährige Germanist Dr. Joseph Goebbels, organisierte mit seinen SA – Führern Wolf Heinrich Graf von Helldorf, Kurt Daluege und Karl Ernst regelrechte Jagden auf Juden in der Berliner Innenstadt, insbesondere auf dem Kurfürstendamm.1 Seit dem großen Wahlerfolg der NSDAP am 14. September 1930, als die Nazis nach der SPD zur zweitstärksten Partei in Deutschland avanciert war, strömten immer mehr Männer, darunter nicht zuletzt junge Leute und Erwerbslose, in die Sturmabteilungen. Hier fanden sie auch die Möglichkeit, kostenlos oder gegen ein geringes Entgelt, eine warme Mahlzeit einzunehmen; in der sich seit 1929 ausbreitenden Weltwirtschaftskrise war dies für breite Schichten der Bevölkerung beinahe ein Luxus. Auch bestanden in manchen SA – Heimen Schlaf- und Unterkunftsmöglichkeiten. Kurzum: Neben der Bereitschaft, sich im politischen Kampf als gewaltbereiter Saal- und Straßenkämpfer zu betätigen, existierten durchaus auch handfeste materielle Interessen, die es für manchen in einer Zeit voller Not und Elend durchaus attraktiv erscheinen ließ, Mitglied der SA zu werden.
    [Show full text]
  • Über Die Ethnische Zugehörigkeit Der Bewohner Von Schweidnitz Im Mittelalter
    Zur Frühgeschichte des Nationalsozialismus und seiner Vorläufer in Schweidnitz Horst Adler Zur Frühgeschichte des Nationalsozialismus und seiner Vorläufer in Schweidnitz (bis 1932)1 Deutsch-völkische Vorläufer bis zur Gründung einer schlesischen NSDAP durch Helmuth Brückner im März 1925 Hier ist nicht der Ort, die verschiedenen völkischen Gruppen und Grüppchen der Weimarer Republik differenziert darzustellen. Einig waren sich alle in ihrer völkisch-antisemitischen Grundhaltung und dem Haß gegen die demokratische Republik. Die Hitlerbewegung war zunächst nur eine unter vielen dieser rechtsradikalen Gruppierungen, die sich auch untereinander bekämpften. Gelegentlich berichten Schweidnitzer Zeitungen über antisemitische Aktionen in der Stadt. Da gibt es die skurrile Gestalt des pathologischen Einzelgängers, des „Dreschgrafen" Walter v. Pückler aus Klein-Tschirne bei Glogau (im August 1924 im Alter von 63 Jahren in Breslau entmündigt gestorben), der im Winter 1921/22 in Schweidnitz von Hotel zu Hotel zieht, wo er meist jugendliche Bewunderer um sich sammelt. Gebannt lauschen sie den antijüdischen Hetzreden, die er gewöhnlich nach dem Ende der Theatervorstellung in den Lokalen von sich gibt. - Die „Mittelschlesische Zeitung“ (MZ), das Schweidnitzer Presseorgan des Zentrums, zitiert am 15. 2. 22 aus einem Artikel der liberalen „Schweidnitzer Zeitung“ (SZ) unter der Überschrift: „Die Judenrede des Dreschgrafen in der ‘Krone’ und ihre Früchte". Danach habe dieser nicht nur allgemein antisemitische Parolen verkündet, sondern gezielt dazu aufgerufen, bestimmte Schweidnitzer Juden zu „dreschen". Er selbst und seine Jubeljünger hätten Gäste als „Judenhengste, Judenknechte, Judenschweine und Schweinejuden" beleidigt. Nach diesem Bericht hat ein 16jähriger Junge „aus guter Familie“ schon im Sommer 1921 in etwa zwölf Schaufensterscheiben eingeritzt: „Kauft nicht bei Juden!" Die betroffenen Geschäfts- leute hätten auf Schadenersatzansprüche gegenüber dem Vater verzichtet.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigg Bm.Pdf (651.5Kb)
    notes note on sources Although oral testimonies are subject to fallible human memories, they have none- theless proven invaluable in explaining several documents collected for this study. Documents never before seen by historians, found in people’s closets, basements, and desk drawers, created a much fuller and complex history, especially when their owners supplied the background and history of the documents as well. These sources helped re-create the unique and tragic history of the Mischlinge, which is still so little understood over half a century later. The thousands of pages of documents and oral testimonies (on 8 mm video and VHS video) in this study are now part of the permanent collection at the Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv in Freiburg, Germany, as the Bryan Mark Rigg Collection. Although interviews need to be treated with some skepticism, they have repeatedly shown that oral history often enriches rather than contradicts historical documents. All too often, history is written without the human element, that is, without knowing what these people thought, felt, and believed. Oral history helps reconstruct many of these people’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs through their diaries, letters, interviews, and photographs. In this way, a healthy combination of hard documents or primary sources and secondary sources and testimonies expands our sense of this history. Often one reads about men and women but feels no human connection with them. The interviews were done to try to bridge this gap and to pro- vide readers with the means to enter these men’s and women’s thoughts and feelings to understand them better and to deepen readers’ knowledge of this history.
    [Show full text]
  • HITLER HALTS EXECUTIONS; ONFOURTHHERE Eimrey FREE COURTS to JUDGE PLOHERS Block Dance and Entertain
    THE WEATHER AVERAGE DAILY CIRCXUATION ForeoMt of D. B. Woathor Btuomi, tor tiM Moatb of Jaao, 19M Hartford thoader ohowon tUo attar- 5,428 noon or oarly tonlgntt Wedneoday Bfember of tlw Aodit fair and eboler. BaroM of Cbcnlatioiis. (daaolBed Adverttalag on Hagn Id.) MANCHESTER, CONN., TUESDAY. JULY S. 1934. (TWELVE PAGES) PRICE THREE CENTS VOL. L in „ NO. 233. Principals In “Second Revolution” B1GPR0GR. 4M HITLER HALTS EXECUTIONS; ONFOURTHHERE EimREY FREE COURTS TO JUDGE PLOHERS Block Dance and Entertain- ment Tonight, Fireworks Developments in Germany REPORT 60 KILLED By ASSOCIATED PRESS r mors of the death of the Bavarian ly and Band Concert ' N, V # Today's developments in Ger- premier, Gustav von Kah-, who "4 turned against Hltlo after plotting IN R E C O T REVOLT I with him In,his 1923 "beer putsch." Tomorrow at No Charge. Ctoancellor Hitler In a special or- It .was said he was shot Saturday. der put an end to extreme measures It waa officially stated that the _______ ^ for the control of toe "Second Rev- rOURTH OF JtX Y PkOGBAM ! number of executions in connection olution," announcing that effective ' with Saturday's events was "under July I all offenders against the par- Chancellor Ends Special Measures Used to Quell *"Sec- 1 sixty," but reports continued to in- Tonight ty would be dealt with by the reg- 9 p. m. Block demce, Main : stst that there were many ii.ore, ular courts. j mounting into hundreds. ond Revolution” — Goehring to Replace Von Papen as street between Oak and Maple The eyes of the nation were fo- streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Breslau 1933
    AUFSÄTZE Benjamin Lahusen DIE SELBSTERMÄCHTIGUNG DES RECHTS: BRESLAU 1933 Zum »Stillstand der Rechtspflege« in der Juristischen Zeitgeschichte 1. Pogrom in Breslau Am 11. März 1933 überfiel die SA das Amts- und Landgericht in Breslau. Die Polizei, von ihrem eben ernannten kommissarischen Präsidenten, dem berüchtigten Edmund Heines,1 in Windeseile »gleichgeschaltet«, griff ostentativ nicht ein, während rund 25 SA-Männer durch das Gericht tobten, »Juden raus!« schrien und Richter, Staats- anwälte und Anwälte jüdischer Abstammung aus dem Gebäude jagten, einige von ihnen unter schweren Misshandlungen. Einer der Betroffenen war der Rechtsanwalt Ludwig Foerder. Er war gerade aus der Synagoge gekommen – der 11. März war ein Samstag, damals freilich ein Arbeitstag – und ging am späten Vormittag, vorwiegend aus geselligen Gründen, ins Gericht, um sich mit einigen Kollegen auszutauschen. Als die SA auftauchte, stand er zunächst paralysiert da, versuchte dann, einen Angrei- fer, der ihn am Arm packte, abzuschütteln, worauf dieser einen Totschläger hervor- holte und Foerder zwei heftige Hiebe auf den Kopf gab. Unter starken Schmerzen erreichte Foerder das Dienstzimmer des aufsichtführenden Richters. Von dort aus alarmierte er telefonisch die Polizei, die er kurz danach »in denkbar gemächlichem Schritt« anrücken sah und daraufhin begriff, dass Hilfe nicht zu erwarten war. 1 Edmund Heines (1897–1934), seit 1922 Mitglied von NSDAP und SA, 1923 Teilnehmer am Hitler- Putsch, an mehreren Fememorden beteiligt, seit 1930 Mitglied des Reichstages, seit März 1933 preußischer Staatsrat. Am 26. März 1933 wurde er offiziell zum Breslauer Polizeipräsidenten ernannt, zudem stieg er zum stellvertretenden Gauleiter Schlesiens auf, bevor er in Ungnade fiel und im Zuge des sog. Röhm-Putsches am 30.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Sport in Germany, 1924-1935. Michael B
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1977 Soldiers, sportsmen, and politicians. : Military sport in Germany, 1924-1935. Michael B. Barrett University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Barrett, Michael B., "Soldiers, sportsmen, and politicians. : Military sport in Germany, 1924-1935." (1977). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1359. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1359 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOLDIERS, SPORTSMEN, AND POLITICIANS. MILITARY SPORT IN GERMANY, 19 24-1935. A Dissertation Presented By Michael Baker Barrett Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 1977 History SOLDIERS, SPORTSMEN , AND POLITICIANS MILITARY SPORT IN GERMANY, 19 24-1935 A Dissertation Presented By Michael Baker Barrett Approved as to style and content by: (Harold J. Gordory Jr.) , Chairperson (Peter Fliess) , Member (Robert H. McNeal) , Member (Marvin Schwarz) / Member (herald McFarland) History iv ABSTRACT SOLDIERS, SPORTSMEN, AND POLITICIANS. MILITARY SPORT IN GERMANY, 19 24-193 5. May 1977 Michael B. Barrett, B.A., The Citadel M.A., Ph.D., University of Massachusetts Directed by: Professor Harold J. Gordon, Jr. This dissertation focuses on the subject of military sport training in Germany from 1924 to 1935. Through this type of instruction, which paralleled basic military re- cruit training, the Arm}/ attempted to circumvent the Ver- sailles Treaty restrictions which prohibited a military reserve force.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Man in Berlin Also by Gaynor Johnson
    Our Man in Berlin Also by Gaynor Johnson THE BERLIN EMBASSY OF LORD D'ABERNON, 1920-1926 LOCARNO REVISITED: European Diplomacy 1920-1929 (Editor) FANATICISM AND MODERN WARFARE, 1890-1990 (Co-editor with Matthew Hughes) THE FOREIGN OFFICE AND BRITISH DIPLOMACY IN THE TWENTIETH CENTURY (Editor) Our Man in Berlin The Diary of Sir Eric Phipps, 1933-1937 Edited by Gaynor Johnson (I Gaynor Johnson 2008 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2008 978-0-230-51787-5 All rights reserved. No reproduction. copy or trilnsmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, (opied or transmitted * save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright,lnsigns and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright LicensingAgency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, l ondon W1T 4lP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted her fight to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Pa tents Act 1988. First published in 2008 by PALGRAVE MACMILlAN Houndmills. Basingstoke. Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue. New Yori:.. N.Y. 10010 Companies and representatives throughout the world. PALGRAVE MAC MILlAN is the global academic imprint of the Palgrave Macmillan division of St. Martin's Press. LlC and of Patgrave Macmillan Ltd. Macmil!anl> is a registered trademark in the United States. United Kingdom and other countries_Palgrave is a registered trademark in the European Union and other countries.
    [Show full text]