DOCSLIB.ORG

Botanic Gardens Are Important Contributors to Crop Wild Relative Preservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botanic Gardens Are Important Contributors to Crop Wild Relative Preservation Published November 21, 2019 RESEARCH Botanic Gardens Are Important Contributors to Crop Wild Relative Preservation Abby Meyer* and Nicholas Barton Botanic Gardens Conservation International US at at The Huntington ABSTRACT Library, Art Museum, and Botanical Gardens, 1151 Oxford Rd., San Humans rely on crop wild relatives (CWRs) for Marino, CA 91108. Received 2 June 2019. Accepted 11 Oct. 2019. sustainable agriculture and food security through *Corresponding author ([email protected]). Assigned to Associate augmentation of crop yield, disease resistance, Editor Joseph Robins. and climatic tolerance, among other important Abbreviations: BGCI, Botanic Gardens Conservation International; traits. Many CWRs are underrepresented in crop CWR, crop wild relative; GRIN, Germplasm Resources Information gene banks. With at least one-third of known Network. plant species maintained in botanic garden living collections, the botanic garden community serves as an important global ex situ network rop wild relatives (CWRs), plants that have “an indirect that supports plant conservation and research Cuse derived from its relatively close genetic relationship to a around the world. We sought to characterize crop,” provide important genetic diversity needed by breeders and botanic garden holdings of CWRs and demon- scientists to develop a wide range of crop plant adaptations (Maxted strate capacity for cross-sector coordination in et al., 2006, p. 2680). Benefits such as increased production, better support of CWR ex situ preservation. To do this, nutrition, drought tolerance, and pest and disease resistance have Botanic Gardens Conservation International been made possible through the use of CWRs and allowed for US (BGCI-US), in partnership with the United more consistent and sustainable yields of conventional crops for States Botanic Garden, used the BGCI Plant- Search database to conduct an ex situ survey of decades (Dempewolf et al., 2017; Guarino and Lobell, 2011; Hajjar CWRs maintained in botanic gardens. We found and Hodgkin, 2007; Maxted et al., 2006, 2012). Like many plant 28.6% of global priority CWR taxa and 75.4% species, CWRs face several threats including climate change, of US priority CWR taxa represented in botanic habitat fragmentation and degradation, invasive species, overex- gardens. By comparing with priority CWR ploitation, and agricultural expansion (Kell et al., 2012; Vincent holdings in crop gene banks, botanic gardens et al., 2013). Studies have found that significant ex situ gaps exist maintain 22 global priority and 108 US priority among crop gene bank collections of CWRs (Castañeda-Álvarez et CWR taxa not reported by crop gene banks. al., 2016; Khoury et al., 2019). Findings by Castañeda-Álvarez et al. A combination of crop gene bank and botanic (2016), for example, that nearly one-third of global CWRs have no garden holdings results in broader taxonomic ex situ germplasm accessions, and <5% are considered adequately coverage. Looking more closely at 10 US priority represented in crop gene banks, suggest that the current ability to CWR species, findings demonstrate that botanic adequately preserve CWRs in crop gene banks is lacking. gardens have the capacity to fill critical CWRs gaps in crop gene bank collections, and botanic Botanic garden holdings include the use of living plant speci- gardens maintain samples from wild popula- mens in traditional display beds indoors or outdoors, as well as tions not represented in crop gene banks. We nursery collections, common garden plantings, seed orchards, call on the crop gene bank and botanic garden or field gene banks, as well as a growing number of world-class communities to use an integrated collections development approach for further coordina- Published in Crop Sci. 59:2404–2412 (2019). tion, complementarity, and duplication of ex situ doi: 10.2135/cropsci2019.06.0358 CWR plant genetic resources. © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 2404 WWW.CROPS.ORG CROP SCIENCE, VOL. 59, NOVEMBER–DECEMBER 2019 facilities with preserved tissues and seed accessions. The with native distributions in the United States, many of which origin, or source, of plant material maintained in botanic have been assessed as threatened in the wild (Khoury et al., 2013). Both lists were aligned with synonyms based on Germ- gardens can vary broadly, from cultivated or horticul- plasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) Taxonomy tural origin, to documented wild origin. The PlantSearch (USDA-ARS-NPGS, 2018b) to ensure a comprehensive cross- database is used to network and connect >1100 botanic reference of botanic garden holdings. garden living plant, seed, and tissue collections around The Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) the world (BGCI, 2018). PlantSearch reveals that botanic PlantSearch database, a taxon-level, global repository of botanic gardens maintain at least 30% of all known plant species garden collections data, includes nearly 1.5 million collection in ex situ collections, including >41% of species assessed as records from >1100 botanic garden living plant, tissue, and seed globally threatened (Mounce et al., 2017). In the United bank collections worldwide. PlantSearch is used to track ex situ States, botanic gardens maintain an estimated 40% of conservation progress for threatened and priority plant taxa native threatened plant species (Kramer et al., 2011). (BGCI, 2018). PlantSearch also connects thousands of online While many botanic gardens maintain plant collections research requests for information and material to botanic garden with ornamental and aesthetic value for public enjoy- collection managers each year. Each taxon record reported by an institution to PlantSearch means that at least one accession ment, a growing number of botanic gardens around the and at least one living or viable specimen is present in that world collect and maintain genetically diverse and wild- garden’s collection. To assess representation of CWRs in living origin plant material to support research and conservation collections maintained in botanic gardens, the CWR lists were (Dosmann and Groover, 2012; Friedman et al., 2016). matched with plant names reported to PlantSearch as of May When combined, these collections form a metacollection 2018. The resulting inventory allowed us to analyze presence of plants that can be maintained, augmented, and shared and absence of priority CWRs maintained in botanic gardens. in coordinated and intentional ways to support research We also compared botanic garden holdings with crop gene and conservation (Griffith et al., 2019). bank holdings to assess complementarity and potential synergy The globally distributed network of botanic gardens between the botanic garden and crop gene bank communi- serves as an important safety net for wild plant genetic ties. To do this, we used a list of active accessions in Genesys, resources, as well as valuable contributors to ongoing a database of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture dialogues within the scientific community and the general maintained in gene banks worldwide (Genesys, 2019). We also sought to characterize infraspecific diversity public. The ex situ metacollection of wild species main- and documentation of botanic garden holdings of CWRs, so tained in botanic gardens likely includes CWR germplasm we selected 10 species from the US priority CWR list from valuable for the future of crop breeding and food security. Khoury et al. (2013) for a more detailed look at accessions Botanic gardens also offer world-class facilities and exper- provenance. The target species were selected to represent a tise in ex situ preservation and plant breeding and provide range of associated crops and uses, geographic distributions, valuable outreach opportunities to >500 million botanic growth habits, and presence ex situ collections. Botanic garden garden visitors and students each year on topics including holdings were identified for survey based on PlantSearch data, crop diversity and food security (Krishnan et al., 2019; and in July 2018, we contacted curatorial staff at 46 botanic Miller et al., 2015; O’Donnell and Sharrock, 2018). gardens via e-mail with a request for provenance data associated Given the gaps in gene bank CWR collections, and with all living accessions of the 10 target species. We compiled the capacity of botanic gardens to maintain such species, accession records from each botanic garden into standardized there appears to be significant potential for additional fields including provenance type, collection year, source, and country, municipality, county, and locality of origin. Using this collaboration and alignment of CWR preservation by information, we assessed approximate ex situ representation of the global crop gene bank and botanic garden communi- wild populations. To directly compare botanic garden holdings ties. To explore this potential, we set out to characterize with crop gene bank holdings, we mapped the historical natural the depth and breadth of botanic garden CWR holdings, range provided by Bartosh (personal communication, 2018) describe the level of documentation and types of CWR with wild origin collections for Juglans hindsii (Jeps.) R. E. Sm. collections maintained, and demonstrate current and reported by crop gene banks and botanic gardens. potential capacity for botanic garden living collections to support CWR preservation, breeding, and research. RESULTS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protected Areas and the Challenge of Conserving Crop Wild Relatives
    PARKS 2012 Vol 18.1 PROTECTED AREAS AND THE CHALLENGE OF CONSERVING CROP WILD RELATIVES Danny Hunter1*, Nigel Maxted2, Vernon Heywood3, Shelagh Kell2 and Teresa Borelli1 * Corresponding author, [email protected] 1 Bioversity International, Rome, Italy 2 School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Crop wild relatives are a critical resource for sustaining future food security. It is widely recognized that many of the world’s protected areas contain CWR diversity. Despite this, it has not yet proved possible to undertake significant actions to conserve the CWR they contain. Many challenges and obstacles need to be addressed in order to improve this situation. Recent initiatives have started to address these challenges and uncovered some key lessons. Still, the need for action is urgent and the paper concludes by drawing attention to the need for a global approach to conserving priority and threatened CWR in the wild. INTRODUCTION worth noting that the same study found breeders’ use of CWR taxa was increasing year on year, even though it Crop wild relatives (CWR) - wild plant species closely was recognized that they were still far from being related to crops to which they may contribute beneficial systematically exploited. genes - constitute an enormous reservoir of genetic variation for crop improvement and are an important Some idea of the scale of benefits may be obtained from socio-economic resource. Genes from wild plants have published estimates referring to a selected number of provided crops with resistance to many pests and crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Unifying Global Hotspots of Wild and Domesticated Biodiversity
    plants Review Toward Unifying Global Hotspots of Wild and Domesticated Biodiversity Samuel Pironon 1,*, James S. Borrell 1, Ian Ondo 1, Ruben Douglas 1, Charlotte Phillips 2, Colin K. Khoury 3,4 , Michael B. Kantar 5 , Nathan Fumia 5 , Marybel Soto Gomez 6,7 , Juan Viruel 1 , Rafael Govaerts 1 ,Félix Forest 1 and Alexandre Antonelli 1,8 1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW93AQ, UK; [email protected] (J.S.B.); [email protected] (I.O.); [email protected] (R.D.); [email protected] (J.V.); [email protected] (R.G.); [email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (A.A.) 2 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Wakehurst Place TW93AE, UK; [email protected] 3 International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali 6713, Colombia; [email protected] 4 Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA 5 Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA; [email protected] (M.B.K.); [email protected] (N.F.) 6 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada; [email protected] 7 UBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z4, Canada 8 Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 17 July 2020; Accepted: 27 August 2020; Published: 31 August 2020 Abstract: Global biodiversity hotspots are areas containing high levels of species richness, endemism and threat. Similarly, regions of agriculturally relevant diversity have been identified where many domesticated plants and animals originated, and co-occurred with their wild ancestors and relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Wild Relatives: Plant Conservation for Food Security
    Natural England Research Report NERR037 Crop Wild Relatives: Plant conservation for food security www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR037 Crop Wild Relatives: Plant conservation for food security John Hopkins1 and Nigel Maxted2 1Natural England 2University of Birmingham Published on 25 January 2011 © Natural England copyright 2011 ISSN 1754-1956 This material is subject to Natural England copyright protection under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988. Natural England copyright protected material (other than Natural England logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium for non-commercial purposes, private study, criticism, review, news reporting and for internal circulation within your organisation. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. Where any of the Natural England copyright material is being republished or copied to others, the source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged. However, if you wish to use all or part of this information for commercial purposes, including publishing you will need to apply for a licence. Applications can be sent to: Publications Natural England 3rd Floor, Touthill Close, City Road Peterborough PE1 1XN Tel: 0845 600 3078 Fax: 01733 455103 Email: [email protected] Crop Wild Relatives: Plant conservation for food security i Project details This report is a review of the scientific literature relating to Crop Wild Relatives and related aspects of crop genetic diversity conservation, carried out by the authors. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN037 – Crop Wild Relatives: Plant conservation for food security.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 November 2017 Reports
    August 2017 IT/GB-7/17/24 E Item 17.4 of the Provisional Agenda SEVENTH SESSION OF THE GOVERNING BODY Kigali, Rwanda, 30 October – 3 November 2017 Reports from Institutions that have Concluded Agreements with the Governing Body under Article 15 of the International Treaty Executive Summary The document contains the Reports provided by the Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research and one other International Institution that have concluded agreements with the Governing Body pursuant to Article 15 of the International Treaty, for the information and consideration of the Governing Body. The reports are provided, as they were received by the Secretariat, in the Appendices to this document. The document also provides update on activities carried out by the Secretariat and some recent developments, during the biennium, in regard to international germplasm collections that are held under Article 15 of the Treaty, whose continued maintenance has been reported to be experiencing major difficulties or are under threat. Guidance Sought The Governing Body is invited to consider the reports and the information provided in this document, and provide further guidance, taking into account the elements for a possible Resolution provided in Appendix 1 to this Document. This document can be accessed using the Quick Response Code on this page; an FAO initiative to minimize its environmental impact and promote greener communications. Other documents can be consulted at http://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/meetings/meetings- detail/en/c/888771/ 2 IT/GB-7/17/24 Table of Contents Paragraphs I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 – 2 II. SUMMARY OF THE REPORTS RECEIVED .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Crop Trust 2015
    THE CROP TRUST ANNUAL REPORT 2015 SUMMARY WWW.CROPTRUST.ORG/2015 1 THE CROP TRUST ANNUAL REPORT 2015 DEAR FRIENDS In this historic year, the nations of the world committed to a guiding set of Sustainable Development Goals and to action against the challenges of climate change. And the Crop Trust continued in its commitment to safeguard the agrobiodiversity that lies at the very root of sustainable development and climate adaptation alike. What did that commitment look like in 2015? The sound administrative and financial management of our partner genebanks got sounder. The Crop Wild Relatives project reached its peak with a full program of action across some 30 countries. Genesys, the global portal to information about crop collections, got more powerful and easier to use. The Svalbard Global Seed Vault saw new deposits, and its first retrieval – of important material from the genebank of the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) in Aleppo, Syria. Seeing those seeds sprout again will be an occasion for joy. There are solutions to our world’s challenges to be found in the diversity of life – as long as we keep it alive. With thanks to all our supporters, MARIE HAGA AND WALTER FUST 2 From the farmers of the Sacred Valley of Peru to The Prince of Wales, in 2015 our partners left us with no doubt that the work we do, and the ‘‘ global system we are building together, is all at once inspiring, exciting, and absolutely essential. MARIE HAGA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ,, This year we continued to build up our support to crop collections, their inter-linkage in a global system for ex situ conservation, and the ‘‘ accessibility of all the diversity they hold.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methodologies for the Global in Situ Conservation of Crop
    Developing methodologies for the global in situ conservation of crop wild relatives By Holly A. Vincent A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biosciences The University of Birmingham June 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Climate change is predicted to have far-reaching deleterious impacts worldwide; agriculture in particular is expected to be effected by significant loss of suitable land and crop yields in the world’s most populous and poorest regions. Crop wild relatives (CWR) are a rich source of underutilised genetic diversity which could help to mitigate climate change for agriculture through breeding new resilient varieties. However, CWR are under-conserved and threatened in the wild. This thesis researches and develops systematic methodologies to advance knowledge and support action on in situ CWR conservation at the global level. Methods included developing a global inventory of CWR associated with crops important for food security worldwide, species distribution modelling, climate change analysis, in situ gap analysis, reserve planning and prioritisation, and, examining the congruence of CWR distributions with regions of high biodiversity and crop diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief Global Conservation Priorities for Crop Wild Relatives
    Policy Brief Global Conservation Priorities for Crop Wild Relatives Key Facts and Recommendations: • First of its kind global mapping effort reveals over 70% of essential crop wild relative species are under- represented in genebanks worldwide leaving food security unnecessarily vulnerable to future climate change • Collection efforts to preserve wild species with resilient traits useful for improving our crops ability to tolerate heat and pests must be stepped up • Long-term global food security requires inter- national collaboration on collecting, conserva- tion, and sharing these valuable genetic resources. • Countries are invited to use findings as a baseline to measure their progress on development and conservation commitments e.g. target 2.5 of the UN Sustainable Development Goals Many of the wild plant species at the foundation of the global food supply are missing from the world’s genebanks, according to new research by the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) in coordination with the Global Crop Diversity Trust (Crop Trust) and the Royal Botanic Gardens (RBG), Kew. Crop wild relatives (CWR) are distant cousins of well-known food crops like rice, potato and wheat that contain traits such as drought and heat tolerance, and pest and disease resistance. This genetic diversity makes them an invaluable resource for plant breeders working to develop crops capable of adapting to the impacts of climate change, including higher temperatures, increased soil salinity due to rising sea levels, and more frequent and severe pest and disease outbreaks. The inability to access these crop wild relatives removes options to improve crops, leaving our food supply, and agricultural producers, vulnerable.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Trust Briefing
    Agenda Item 12 For Information Re-Issued: 08 May 2018 Future Funding of CGIAR Genebanks: Background Document-Revision 1 Purpose This revised paper sets out the long-term fundraising goal of the Crop Trust, the commitments made to the Genebank Platform to 2022 and the short-term challenges to meet the fundraising target of $500 million by 2022 in order to fund the Article 15 collections in perpetuity. Action requested The System Council is asked to consider this background information ahead of the Crop Trust’s presentation to the System Council’s 6th meeting on the topic “Future Funding of CGIAR Genebanks”. Document category: Working document of the System Council There is no restriction on the circulation of this document Prepared by: Crop Trust 6th CGIAR System Council Meeting Revision1-SC6-08 16-17 May 2018, Berlin, Germany Page 1 of 16 Future Funding of CGIAR Genebanks Background Document - System Council 17 May 2018 Meeting Prepared by the Global Crop Diversity Trust 7 May 2018 1. Purpose The purpose of this paper is to provide System Council Members with background information ahead of the Crop Trust’s presentation to Members on 17 May 2018 on the topic “Future Funding of CGIAR Genebanks”. This paper sets out the long term fundraising goal of the Crop Trust, the commitments made to the Genebank Platform to 2022 and the short-term challenges to meet the fundraising target of $500 million by 2022 in order to fund the Article 15 collections under the International Treaty of Plant Genetic Resource (ITPGR) in perpetuity. 2. Fundraising Targets The Crop Trust’s Strategic Workplan sets out a target of USD 850 million required in the endowment fund in order to fund the operation of a global portfolio of national and international collections for the ex-situ conservation of crop diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Completing a Global Task
    COMPLETING A GLOBAL TASK Conserving Crop Diversity, Forever 15 YEARS The first 15 years of forever In 2004, the genetic foundation But it wasn’t all gloom and doom. At The Crop Trust was established in of everything we eat rested on a conference organized by the UN October 2004 with a mission to treacherous ground. Crop diversity Food and Agriculture Organization help build a global system of ex situ – the raw material that breeders in 1996, 150 countries had launched crop diversity conservation and use and farmers need to prepare for a Global Plan of Action on crop and fund it through an endowment the challenges of the future – could diversity, eventually to form a major that would make it a lasting reality. be found in genebanks all over the pillar of the landmark International When the Governing Body of the world, but it was nowhere near as Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources Plant Treaty held its first meeting in secure as its immense importance for Food and Agriculture (‘the 2006, it recognized the Crop Trust as demanded. Plant Treaty’). The Plant Treaty an essential element of the Treaty’s brought the diversity of 64 food and funding strategy. Sometimes, accidents and disasters forage crops, as well as a roster struck. Sometimes, quite simply, of international crop collections, Today, a USD 300 million Endowment genebanks suffered budget cuts into a multilateral system where Fund meets more and more of the and couldn’t pay their electricity this material will forever remain needs of the world’s most important bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Wild Relatives
    Crop wild relatives The Crop Wild Relatives Project The benefits of foods from the forests The value of wild relatives Managing Editor Contents Ruth D. Raymond An introduction to crop wild relatives 1 ssistant Managing Editor The Crop Wild Relatives Project 2 Cassandra Moore Use crop wild relatives or lose them! 3 Intern Kelly Wagner Wild foods are rich in micronutrients 4 Design & layout The benefits of foods from the forests 5 Patrizia Tazza Frances Ferraiuolo The value of wild relatives 6 Cover Photo Bringing crop relatives to the public 7 The wild relatives of banana could provide solutions for Spicy wild relatives get some respect 8 improving the crop, which is notoriously difficult to breed. The importance of wild bananas in Sri Lanka 9 Karen Robinson/Panos Wild relatives offer new lease on life to an ancient grain 10 Pictures Global conference maps out future for wild relatives 11 © Bioversity International 2006 Regional catalogue supports national strategies 12 Reprinted from Geneflow 2006. Putting diversity back into wheat 13 Protecting the wild relatives of walnut 14 Saving Central Asia's pistachio diversity 15 Ask the old women 16 Tapping the potential of medicinal and aromatic plants in northern Europe 17 Climate change threatens wild relatives with extinction 18 This publication was Wild potato relative may blunt late blight 19 supported by the UNEP/GEF On the rocks 20 project "In situ conservation of crop wild relatives through Spreading the word about wild relatives 21 enhanced information management and field Wild relatives could help boost berry market 22 application." Groundnut relatives hit the spot 23 Glossary 24 n introduction to crop wild relatives Crop wild relatives include value of some crops, crop ancestors as well as including protein content other species more or less in durum wheat, calcium closely related to crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Section A. Crop Wild Relatives A.1
    SECTION A. CROP WILD RELATIVES A.1. Introduction What are crop wild relatives? Crop wild relatives (CWR) are taxa closely related to crops and are defined by their potential ability to contribute beneficial traits for crop improvement; for example, to confer resistance to pests and diseases, improve tolerance to environmental conditions such as extreme temperatures, drought and flooding, and to improve nutrition, flavour, colour, texture and handling qualities . A working definition of a CWR based on the Gene Pool concept or, in the 1 absence of crossing and genetic diversity information, the Taxon Group concept , has been proposed: ‘‘A crop wild relative is a wild plant taxon that has an indirect use derived from its relatively close genetic relationship to a crop; this relationship is defined in terms of the CWR belonging to gene pools 1 or 2, or taxon groups 1 to 4 of the crop’’. Pyrus salicifolia Pall., a wild relative of pear (P. pyraster Burgsd.), in Naxcıvan, Azerbaijan. This species grows in very dry and rocky areas; in some places the seeds of P. salicifolia are used to obtain the rootstock for local varieties of pears (photo: Mirza Musayev). Genetic erosion is a key problem for CWR. What is genetic erosion? Genetic erosion is a fundamental problem for CWR and has been referred to in the literature as the permanent reduction in richness (total number of alleles) or evenness (i.e. spread of allelic diversity)3 of common local alleles, or the loss of combinations of alleles over time in a defined area4. Genetic erosion can affect wild populations conserved in situ and ex situ collections (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop Wild Relative Checklist and Inventory Descriptors V.1
    Crop wild relative checklist and inventory descriptors v.1 Bioversity International and University of Birmingham Crop wild relative checklist and inventory descriptors v.1 ii Crop wild relative checklist and inventory descriptors v.1 Bioversity International is a research-for-development organization working with partners worldwide to use and conserve agricultural and forest biodiversity for improved livelihoods, nutrition, sustainability and productive and resilient ecosystems. Bioversity International is working towards a world in which smallholder farming communities in developing countries of Africa, Asia and the Americas are thriving and sustainable. Bioversity International focuses on rain-fed farming systems, primarily managed by smallholder farmers, in areas where large-scale agriculture is not a viable option. Its research influences policy decisions and investment in agricultural research, from the local level to the global level. Bioversity International is a member of the CGIAR Consortium, a global partnership that unites organizations engaged in research for a food secure future. CGIAR research is dedicated to reducing rural poverty, increasing food security, improving human health and nutrition, and ensuring more sustainable management of natural resources. It is carried out by the 15 centers who are members of the CGIAR Consortium in close collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations, including national and regional research institutes, civil society organizations, academia, and the private sector. www.cgiar.org University of Birmingham is one of the leading research-based universities in the United Kingdom (UK). The School of Biosciences (within the College of Life and Environmental Sciences) has been a leading teaching and research centre for plant genetic resources (PGR) conservation and sustainable use since the 1960s.
    [Show full text]