Prof Bob Walker
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Dr Betty Con Walker PhD Ec(Syd) BEc(Syd) DipEd(Syd) SUBMISSION TO SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY ON STRENGTHENING MULTICULTURALISM 1. MULTICULTURALISM IS NOT A ‘WOG’ WORD Protecting and strengthening Australia’s multiculturalism and social inclusion is inhibited by the assumptions behind the meaning and application of the concept of multiculturalism.1 While there is not a single definition of multiculturalism, there appears to be continuing anachronistic acceptance that it applies to immigrants from non-English speaking backgrounds and their place in Australia in relation to the majority population of white Anglo-Celtics. And contemporary discussions of multiculturalism fail to place any emphasis on the need to repair relationships between the original Australians and those who have migrated since 1788. This is a flawed interpretation. Not only is it an insult to our first Australians – but it also implies that the heritage and culture system of the Anglo-Celtic population are superior to those of immigrants from non-English backgrounds. It is little wonder that the recent First Nations National Constitutional Convention in its Uluru Statement from the Heart called for a national representative body to advise Parliament on laws that affect Indigenous Australians, and a Meekatharra Commission to supervise a process of treaty-making and truth-telling about Australia’s history. What is clear is that there is a need to accept multiculturalism as applying to and embracing all Australians – as we are all immigrants to a country occupied by our Indigenous population. Until that occurs, multiculturalism (which has been described dismissively as a ‘wog’ word by an acquaintance ignorant of my Greek heritage) will continue to be seen as a concept ‘applying only to immigrants’ – more specifically, non-Anglo-Celtic immigrants. This interpretation provides an opportunity for extremists to arouse antipathy from certain elements in the community. In the process, this is likely to weaken – rather than strengthen – Australia’s multiculturalism and social inclusion. It would be a great achievement if the Committee can contribute to the acceptance of multiculturalism as a whole-community concept. 1 Many other interested parties have commented on the history of the evolution of multiculturalism in Australia so that is not repeated in this submission. _________________________________________________________________________ 2. WHY COMMENT? I write to you as a person with a continuing interest in this area and as someone of Greek heritage with a family name of Constantinidis (later ‘Con’); and a family originating from the tiny Greek Island of Symi, one of the Dodecanese Islands in the Aegean Sea. My observations also draw on my experience in serving as a member of several former Federal Government agencies: the National Committee on Discrimination in Employment and Occupation, the Australian Council on Population and Ethnic Affairs, and the Australian Institute of Multicultural Affairs (in its final years of operation under the then Labor Government). I also had an involvement with the Ethnic Communities Council of NSW. 3. CHALLENGES TO HUMAN RIGHTS AND SOCIAL COHESION Of great concern are recent challenges to the Human Rights Commission by various politicians and commentators, as is the proposed concentration of power under the cover of national security under a single politician. The subjugation of immigration as a subset of national security has the potential of equating immigration, in some eyes, as a threat to national security. Moreover, this subjugation has the potential for immigration to lose its place in Australia’s consideration as a major contributor to economic growth and nation building. This together with the government’s use of international events and changes in migration trends to introduce more restrictive legislation, means that it is becoming increasingly more important for government to be provided with strong independent advice. The recent citizenship requirements are one example of the type of policies which challenge social cohesion as they are seen by new immigrants from non-English speaking backgrounds as an additional barrier to their goal of belonging to the Australian family. Equally, the new requirements are seen as insulting and affronting by those immigrants who have attained citizenship – but who are cognisant of the fact that they would not have been able to pass the new requirements and thus would not now be citizens. 4. STOP REINVENTING THE WHEEL ON ADVISORY BODIES Of course, advisory bodies on immigration and ethnic affairs is not a new phenomenon. Since multiculturalism was introduced in Australia in the 1970s, federal governments have set up various advisory bodies partly to help with promoting support for that concept in the population at large. New advisory bodies replacing existing ones have sometimes amounted to reinventing the wheel with just different participants – sometimes based on party affiliations – rather than qualifications or experience. This has meant that often new bodies have not been more effective than those they have replaced. 2 It is time that appointments to such advisory bodies are made on merit alone rather than based on support for the government of the day. 5. HIGH LEVEL INDEPENDENT ADVICE TO GOVERNMENT / PARLIAMENT NEEDED In this context, the Committee is reminded of the Australian Council on Population and Ethnic Affairs (ACPEA) which was formed in May 1981 – replacing the Australian Ethnic Affairs Council, the Australian Population and Immigration Council, and the Australian Refugee Advisory Council. This agency was characterised by the fact that it was chaired by the then Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs and included some very heavy hitters to provide leadership in this area and to provide fiercely independent advice to government. ACPEA was set up to advise government on policy matters within the immigration and ethnic affairs portfolio. Its work was largely undertaken through four task forces as follows. • Migration Policy Task Force considered information on present and future migration programs; • Population Task Force was responsible for monitoring demographic trends and their implications; • Ethnic Affairs Task Force was concerned with matters related to the integration of migrants into the Australian community; and • Citizenship Task Force considered a review of citizenship legislation; and procedures and measures to increase awareness and enhancement of Australian citizenship. Direct advice to the government was ensured by the fact that the Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (then the Hon Ian Macphee) was chairman of ACPEA and actually chaired the meetings. Also as far as I am aware – and based on my own appointment – appointments did not depend on any party affiliation. Membership was drawn from academics, ethnic groups, service organisations, trade unions, industry and commerce. Even the Opposition spokesman had a seat as an observer. I was one of the youngest and one of the most junior of a very high level membership. (At the time, I had been one of the few female graduate executive appointments in what was then one of the biggest corporations in Australia, CSR Limited. At one stage, Gordon Jackson, the then CEO of CSR, had tasked me to survey the experiences and attitudes of migrant workers in its workplaces and report back to him. He was cognisant of the positive contributions of a multicultural workforce and was keen to ensure that the CSR workforce knew that.) For illustrative purposes the membership – a mix of heavy hitters from the business community (my self-excluded), and persons who could make specialist contributions to the four major themes of the Council’s work – are shown below. 3 Membership of Australian Council on Population and Ethnic Affairs 1981-82 The Hon Ian Macphee, MP Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Chairman) Mr L.C. Ah Toy President, NT Confederation of Industry and Commerce Prof R.J. Blandy Professor of Economics, Flinders University Prof J.C. Caldwell Head of the Department of Demography, ANU Ms B. Con Labour Economist & Senior Marketing Officer, CSR Ltd Dr D.R. Cox Lecturer, Department of Social studies, University of Melbourne Major-General P.A. Cullen, AO, CBE President of Austcare Mr C.O. Dolan, AO President, ACTU Mr A. Freeleagues, CBE, AM Solicitor and Honorary Consul-General for Greece The Hon. Justice Sir James A. Gobbo Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria, President of CO.AS.IT, Victoria Prof W.P. Hogan Professor of Economics, University of Sydney Ms S. Ivany Business executive Mr B. Loton Chief General Manager, BHP Ltd Sir Bruce MacKinlay, CBE Company director and former President, Confederation of WA Industry Mr I.H. Naqvi Senior Scientific Adviser, Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania; Member of NAATI & of the Tas Migrant Resource Centre committee of management Prof G.M. Neutze Director, Research School of Social Sciences, ANU Mr G. Polites, CMG MBE Director-General, National Employers Industrial Council, Confederation of Australian Industry Mr A.M. Vella,OAM Assistant Secretary, Victorian Trades Hall Council Ms C. Zampatti Fashion designer and company director Prof J. Zubrzycki, CBE Professor of Sociology, ANU Parliamentary observers: Senator B.F. Kilgariff Chairman, Government Members Committee on Immigration & Ethnic Affairs Mr M.J. Young, MP Opposition Spokesman on Immigration & Ethnic Affairs In hindsight, the positives about the ACPEA membership include the direct involvement of the Minister, its tripartite nature, and the seniority of the participants. The negatives are that the membership may be described as being drawn from the ‘elites’ – but that may also be regarded as a positive for the leadership role that such members had the potential to play on a whole-community basis. The more important negative was that there was no Indigenous representation. An overall negative was the fact that its emphasis was still on multiculturalism as a ‘wog’ issue rather than a whole-community issue. This was in line with previous and subsequent such bodies. However, this body had the potential to serve as a whole-community one – though it needed a few tweaks.