International Liquidity Shocks, the Real Economy, and Social Unrest: China, 1931-1935 Fabio Braggion CentER - Tilburg University Department of Finance PO Box 90153, NL 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands Telephone: +31 13 4668209, Fax: +31 13 4662875 E-mail:
[email protected] Alberto Manconi* CentER - Tilburg University Department of Finance PO Box 90153, NL 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands Telephone: +31 13 4662804, Fax: +31 13 4662875 E-mail:
[email protected] Haikun Zhu CentER - Tilburg University Department of Finance PO Box 90153, NL 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands Telephone: +31 13 4664057, Fax: +31 13 4662875 E-mail:
[email protected] Preliminary and incomplete – do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. This Draft: April, 2015 * Corresponding author. We would like to thank the Economic History Association and the European Banking Center for financial support. The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) generously supported Braggion through its VIDI Grant Program during the writing of this paper. International Liquidity Shocks, the Real Economy, and Social Unrest: China, 1931-1935 Abstract What are the social consequences of liquidity shocks? We answer this question relying on a natural experiment from 1930s China, where the money supply contracted as a consequence of the 1933 US Silver Purchase program. Using a novel, hand-collected data set of loan contracts to individual Chinese firms and labor unrest, we find that the resulting bank liquidity shock led to a widespread, large credit contraction. We also find that firms borrowing from banks with a larger exposure to the monetary shock were more likely to experience labor unrest.