DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of Foreland Basins Megan Mueller Field Geology Summer 2020 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of Foreland Basins Megan Mueller Field Geology Summer 2020 2 The Evolution of Foreland Basins Megan Mueller Field Geology Summer 2020 2. Paleozoic Review 2 Generalized History of W. North America Basin & Range Extension, CRBG Pangea Passive margin Laramide Orogeny (miogeocline) Western Interior Seaway Rodinia Sevier Orogeny (and Nevadaplano) Onset of FTB Building (?) Columbia/ Nuna Begin subduction (?) - chaotic organization - passive margin (Slide Mtn basin) 3 Pennsylvanian-Permian • What type of margin? • Sediment transport direction? • Lithology and depositional environments? • Sediment composition? 4 Analog: Namibia • Quadrant: aeolian dunes • Phosphoria: passive margin, epicontinental shallow sea 5 Early Triassic • Chaotic margin • Lithology? • Depositional environment? 6 3. North American Foreland Basin 7 North American Foreland Basin • Major tectonic regions • Magmatic arcs, accreted terranes • Sevier thrust belts • Sevier foreland basin system • Laramide intra-foreland uplifts & basins DeCelles, 2004 AJS 8 North American Foreland Basin • > 1000 km wide, 6000 km long • >100 Myr lifespan • Foreland basin system evolved in response to crust and mantle processes • Late Jurassic to Eocene deposition DeCelles, 2004 AJS 9 Triassic Dinwoody Fm PC: Marli Miller PC: Megan Mueller 10 Triassic to Mid Jurassic • Little topography -> open to Pacific • marine deposition • Triassic Dinwoody Fm • shallow marine shale and limestone • Begin to set-up thrust belt • Foreland system migrates east images by Ron Blakey, Northern Arizona University DeCelles, 2004 AJS 11 Fuentes et al. 2011 12 PC: Maddie Hille Morrison Formation Montana: ~158-152 Ma PC: Megan Mueller What is lithology and depositional environment? 13 14 Late Jurassic (155-142) • Orogenic loading from FTB • Subsidence driven by loading • Eastward migration of magmatism • Low angle subduction or partial delamination • Extension in SW • Obliquity of NW-SE convergence • Rift basin? • Morrison Fm: non-marine shale and sandstone, limestone, conglomerate, paleosols 15 DeCelles, 2004 AJS Morrison Fm Debate • Fluvial, lacustrine • Paleotopography controls thickness • Major unconformity at top Setting and subsidence mechanism? • Foredeep • Does not thicken to W • Not flexural subsidence from FTB • Backbulge • Where is foredeep? Eroded in K. • Metamorphic grade supports thick overburden (foredeep) existed • Dynamic subsidence • Unconformity too far inboard • Slab foundering? Mezcalera or Farallon? • Wavelengths of subsidence debated 16 DeCelles, 2004 AJS PC: Maddie Hille PC: Maddie Hille PC: Adam Woods What is lithology and depositional environment? 17 DeCelles, 2004 AJS Aptian • Sevier Orogeny • East migrating • Classic flexural foreland basin • Flexural loading • Peak FTB • All 4 depozones preserved • Minimal magmatism 18 Skagit River 19 Neuquen, Argentina Kootenai: river channels, floodplain, limestone lakes 20 Western Interior Seaway (shaded) Albian • Blackleaf Fm PC: Adam Woods What is lithology and depositional environment? 21 DeCelles, 2004 AJS Early Cretaceous to Albian • Marine transgressions & regressions • Western Interior Seaway • Kootenai Fm. and Flood Mbr.: paleosols, lacustrine limestones, fluvial and floodplain • Chert, coarse- to fine-grained deposition, thick sed. units • Vaughn Mbr.: shallow marine deposition records transgression 22 DeCelles, 2004 AJS Coniacian (~89-85) • Chaotic subsidence pattern further east • Dynamic subsidence dominates • Asymmetric subsidence pattern in west; symmetric in east • Demise of well-organized foreland system 23 Campanian to Eocene (83-40 Ma) • Laramide intraforeland uplifts • Basement-involved thrusts along paleo-weaknesses • Partitioned basins • Local flexural subsidence • Eastward migration of magmatism and deformation • Interpretation: flat slab subduction DeCelles, 2004 AJS Dumitru 1991 24 Western Interior Seaway peak transgression ~92 Ma Blum & Pecha, 2014 Lockshin et al. 2017 25 NA Foreland Basin Summary • Triassic – Mid-Jurassic: marine deposition, connected to Pacific Ocean • Late Jurassic: orogenic loading, dynamic subsidence from Farallon subduction • Non-marine deposition • Sevier Orogeny • Classic foreland basin system • Fold and thrust belt building • Marine deposition from Western Interior Seaway • Coniacian (89-85) • not well-defined foredeep, dynamic subsidence dominates • ~80 Ma to Eocene: Laramide orogeny • Deformation front migrates east due to flab slab subduction • Local subsidence • Partitioned basins 26 Conclusions • Depositional environments and sedimentary provenance that we see in the field is evidence for all these events! • Sedimentary record preserved in foreland basins document the evolution of orogenies • Stratigraphy is an excellent tool to reconstruct basin history and thus tectonic evolution at the regional scale • Knowledge of basin tectonic evolution helps us to better interpret long-term changes in depositional systems Figures modified from DeCelles 2004 AJS Western Interior Seaway (shaded) Seaway Interior Western.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Catalog of the Sedimentary Basins of the United States
    Preliminary Catalog of the Sedimentary Basins of the United States By James L. Coleman, Jr., and Steven M. Cahan Open-File Report 2012–1111 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: Coleman, J.L., Jr., and Cahan, S.M., 2012, Preliminary catalog of the sedimentary basins of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1111, 27 p. (plus 4 figures and 1 table available as separate files) Available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1111/. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonics and Sedimentation in Foreland Basins: Results from the Integrated Basin Studies Project
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 30, 2021 Tectonics and sedimentation in foreland basins: results from the Integrated Basin Studies project ALAIN MASCLE 1 & CAI PUIGDEFABREGAS 2,3 IIFP School, 228-232 avenue Napoldon Bonaparte, 92852 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France (e-mail: [email protected]) 2Norsk Hydro Research Centre, Bergen, Norway. 3Institut de Ciences de la Terra, (?SIC, Barcelona, Spain. Why foreland basins? to a better understanding of some basic interact- ing tectonic, sedimentary and hydrologic pro- Over the last ten years or so, since the Fribourg cesses (More & Vrolijk 1992; Touret & van meeting in 1985 (Homewood et al. 1986), the Hinte 1992). Additional data have also been attention given by sedimentologists and struc- obtained through the development of analogue tural geologists to the geology of foreland basins and numerical models (Larroque et al. 1992; has been growing continuously, parallel to the Zoetemeijer 1993). The physical parameters increase of co-operative links between scientists controlling the forward propagation of d6colle- from the two disciplines. A number of reasons ments and thrusts (fluid pressure, roughness, lie behind this development. Attempting to sediment thickness, etc.) have been determined understand the growth of an orogen without and tested. The relationships between rapidly paying due attention to the stratigraphic record subsiding piggyback basins and growing ramp of the derived sediments would be unrealistic. It anticlines have also been imaged, although the would, moreover, be equally unrealistic to con- lack of deep-sea well control still prevents accu- struct restored sections across the chain without rate sedimentological studies. More significant considering the constraints imposed by the has been the progress in our understanding of basin-fill architecture, or to describe the basin- the role of fluids and pore pressure in the fill evolution disregarding the development of development of thrust belts.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotectonic Model of the Alpine Development of Lakavica Graben in the Eastern Part of the Vardar Zone in the Republic of Macedonia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UGD Academic Repository Geologica Macedonica, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 87–93 (2013) GEOME 2 ISSN 0352 – 1206 Manuscript received: May 17, 2013 UDC: 551.245.03(497.71/.73) Accepted: October 25, 2013 Original scientific paper GEOTECTONIC MODEL OF THE ALPINE DEVELOPMENT OF LAKAVICA GRABEN IN THE EASTERN PART OF THE VARDAR ZONE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA Goše Petrov, Violeta Stojanova, Gorgi Dimov Faculty of Natural and Technical Sciences, “Goce Delčev” University, P.O.Box 201, MK 2000 Štip, Republic of Macedonia [email protected]//[email protected] A b s t r a c t: Lakavica graben is located in the eastern subzone of the Vardar zone, which during the Alpine orogenesis was covered with very complex processes of tectogenesis. On the area of about 200 km2, in the Lakavica graben, are present geological units from the oldest geological periods (Precam- brian) to the youngest (Neogene and Quaternary). Tectonic structure, or rupture tectonic, is very intense developed and gives possibility for analysis of the geotectonic processes in the Alpine orogen phase. This paper presents the possible model for geotectonic processes in the Lakavica graben, according to which can be generalized geotectonic processes in the Vardar zone during the Alpine orogeny. Key words: Lakavica graben; geotectonic model; Alpine orogeny; Vardar zone INTRODUCTION Vardar zone as a tectonic unit, for the first niki Gulf (Greece), than bent eastward and crosses time, is separated and showed on the "Geological- the ophiolite zone Izmir–Ankara (Turkey).
    [Show full text]
  • From Orogeny to Rifting: When and How Does Rifting Begin? Insights from the Norwegian ‘Reactivation Phase’
    EGU21-469 https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-469 EGU General Assembly 2021 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. From orogeny to rifting: when and how does rifting begin? Insights from the Norwegian ‘reactivation phase’. Gwenn Peron-Pinvidic1,2, Per Terje Osmundsen2, Loic Fourel1, and Susanne Buiter3 1NGU - Geological Survey of Norway, 7040 Trondheim, Norway 2NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway 3Tectonics and Geodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, 52064 Aachen, Germany Following the Wilson Cycle theory, most rifts and rifted margins around the world developed on former orogenic suture zones (Wilson, 1966). This implies that the pre-rift lithospheric configuration is heterogeneous in most cases. However, for convenience and lack of robust information, most models envisage the onset of rifting based on a homogeneously layered lithosphere (e.g. Lavier and Manatschal, 2006). In the last decade this has seen a change, thanks to the increased academic access to high-resolution, deeply imaging seismic datasets, and numerous studies have focused on the impact of inheritance on the architecture of rifts and rifted margins. The pre-rift tectonic history has often been shown as strongly influencing the subsequent rift phases (e.g. the North Sea case - Phillips et al., 2016). In the case of rifts developing on former orogens, one important question relates to the distinction between extensional structures formed during the orogenic collapse and the ones related to the proper onset of rifting. The collapse deformation is generally associated with polarity reversal along orogenic thrusts, ductile to brittle deformation and important crustal thinning with exhumation of deeply buried rocks (Andersen et al., 1994; Fossen, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Rocky Mountain Foreland Basin: Combined Structural
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2007 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA Emily Geraghty Ward The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ward, Emily Geraghty, "DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION, ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA" (2007). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1234. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1234 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN FORELAND BASIN: COMBINED STRUCTURAL, MINERALOGICAL, AND GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF BASIN EVOLUTION ROCKY MOUNTAIN THRUST FRONT, NORTHWEST MONTANA By Emily M. Geraghty Ward B.A., Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, 1999 M.S., Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 2002 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geology The University of Montana Missoula, MT Spring 2007 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School James W. Sears, Chair Department of Geosciences Julia A. Baldwin Department of Geosciences Marc S. Hendrix Department of Geosciences Steven D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tectonic Evolution of the Madrean Archipelago and Its Impact on the Geoecology of the Sky Islands
    The Tectonic Evolution of the Madrean Archipelago and Its Impact on the Geoecology of the Sky Islands David Coblentz Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM Abstract—While the unique geographic location of the Sky Islands is well recognized as a primary factor for the elevated biodiversity of the region, its unique tectonic history is often overlooked. The mixing of tectonic environments is an important supplement to the mixing of flora and faunal regimes in contributing to the biodiversity of the Madrean Archipelago. The Sky Islands region is located near the actively deforming plate margin of the Western United States that has seen active and diverse tectonics spanning more than 300 million years, many aspects of which are preserved in the present-day geology. This tectonic history has played a fundamental role in the development and nature of the topography, bedrock geology, and soil distribution through the region that in turn are important factors for understanding the biodiversity. Consideration of the geologic and tectonic history of the Sky Islands also provides important insights into the “deep time” factors contributing to present-day biodiversity that fall outside the normal realm of human perception. in the North American Cordillera between the Sierra Madre Introduction Occidental and the Colorado Plateau – Southern Rocky The “Sky Island” region of the Madrean Archipelago (lo- Mountains (figure 1). This part of the Cordillera has been cre- cated between the northern Sierra Madre Occidental in Mexico ated by the interactions between the Pacific, North American, and the Colorado Plateau/Rocky Mountains in the Southwest- Farallon (now entirely subducted under North America) and ern United States) is an area of exceptional biodiversity and has Juan de Fuca plates and is rich in geology features, including become an important study area for geoecology, biology, and major plateaus (The Colorado Plateau), large elevated areas conservation management.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-African Orogeny 1
    Encyclopedia 0f Geology (2004), vol. 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam AFRICA/Pan-African Orogeny 1 Contents Pan-African Orogeny North African Phanerozoic Rift Valley Within the Pan-African domains, two broad types of Pan-African Orogeny orogenic or mobile belts can be distinguished. One type consists predominantly of Neoproterozoic supracrustal and magmatic assemblages, many of juvenile (mantle- A Kröner, Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany R J Stern, University of Texas-Dallas, Richardson derived) origin, with structural and metamorphic his- TX, USA tories that are similar to those in Phanerozoic collision and accretion belts. These belts expose upper to middle O 2005, Elsevier Ltd. All Rights Reserved. crustal levels and contain diagnostic features such as ophiolites, subduction- or collision-related granitoids, lntroduction island-arc or passive continental margin assemblages as well as exotic terranes that permit reconstruction of The term 'Pan-African' was coined by WQ Kennedy in their evolution in Phanerozoic-style plate tectonic scen- 1964 on the basis of an assessment of available Rb-Sr arios. Such belts include the Arabian-Nubian shield of and K-Ar ages in Africa. The Pan-African was inter- Arabia and north-east Africa (Figure 2), the Damara- preted as a tectono-thermal event, some 500 Ma ago, Kaoko-Gariep Belt and Lufilian Arc of south-central during which a number of mobile belts formed, sur- and south-western Africa, the West Congo Belt of rounding older cratons. The concept was then extended Angola and Congo Republic, the Trans-Sahara Belt of to the Gondwana continents (Figure 1) although West Africa, and the Rokelide and Mauretanian belts regional names were proposed such as Brasiliano along the western Part of the West African Craton for South America, Adelaidean for Australia, and (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • G17 Laramide and Sevier Orogenies
    PLATE TECTONICS 423 g17 Laramide and Sevier orogenies < cratonal uplifts, thin-skinned thrust tectonics > ... mountains were thought of ... as punishments dealt to Earth by a Creator disappointed at the misbehavior of its inhabitants. This “catastrophist” view affected ... 18th and early 19th centuries, well-born ladies making the Grand Tour in Europe would pull down their window shades to avoid viewing the Alps. —Donald Kennedy.1 The fold-thrust belt of the northern Rocky Mountains is a back-arc east of the Cascade volcanic- mountains and sediment-filled trench of the eastward subducting Juan da Fuca oceanic plate. The central Rocky Mountains is earthquake-active. Its scenery is of a maturely dissected broad-uparch that in erosional section and by exhumation exposes features of the once Laramide mountain chain. The Wyoming Basin and southern Rocky Mountains is a region of reactivated Laramide cratonal uplifts. To the west of the southern Rocky Mountains and Colorado Plateau is the Basin and Range physiographic province. Its graben and horst scenery results from ongoing extension that has doubled the width of the region since the middle Cenozoic. Created are large displacements on listric faults that at their surfacing ends are imbricate normal faulted. This mimics in reverse the geometry produced by a former compressive orogeny called the Sevier.2 Laramide orogeny (Paleocene climax, near the end of the Cretaceous inception.) Laramide refers to ore-producing intrusions (as Boulder batholith, Montana), eastward-shed foreland- basin sediments as the E-K boundary containing undeformed Arapahoe Conglomerate fm and the folded Cretaceous Mesa Verde fm, Colorado.3 These strata are disconformable on Late Cretaceous Interior Seaway Laramic fm that is nonconformable on a Precambrian basement complex Laramide folds and faults resulted from block faulting and thrust faulting of this underlying craton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Penokean Orogeny in the Lake Superior Region Klaus J
    Precambrian Research 157 (2007) 4–25 The Penokean orogeny in the Lake Superior region Klaus J. Schulz ∗, William F. Cannon U.S. Geological Survey, 954 National Center, Reston, VA 20192, USA Received 16 March 2006; received in revised form 1 September 2006; accepted 5 February 2007 Abstract The Penokean orogeny began at about 1880 Ma when an oceanic arc, now the Pembine–Wausau terrane, collided with the southern margin of the Archean Superior craton marking the end of a period of south-directed subduction. The docking of the buoyant craton to the arc resulted in a subduction jump to the south and development of back-arc extension both in the initial arc and adjacent craton margin to the north. A belt of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits formed in the extending back-arc rift within the arc. Synchronous extension and subsidence of the Superior craton resulted in a broad shallow sea characterized by volcanic grabens (Menominee Group in northern Michigan). The classic Lake Superior banded iron-formations, including those in the Marquette, Gogebic, Mesabi and Gunflint Iron Ranges, formed in that sea. The newly established subduction zone caused continued arc volcanism until about 1850 Ma when a fragment of Archean crust, now the basement of the Marshfield terrane, arrived at the subduction zone. The convergence of Archean blocks of the Superior and Marshfield cratons resulted in the major contractional phase of the Penokean orogeny. Rocks of the Pembine–Wausau arc were thrust northward onto the Superior craton causing subsidence of a foreland basin in which sedimentation began at about 1850 Ma in the south (Baraga Group rocks) and 1835 Ma in the north (Rove and Virginia Formations).
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Orogeny
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 PROCESSES OF COLLISION OROGENY Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on October 6, 2021 Shortening of continental lithosphere: the neotectonics of Eastern Anatolia a young collision zone J.F. Dewey, M.R. Hempton, W.S.F. Kidd, F. Saroglu & A.M.C. ~eng6r SUMMARY: We use the tectonics of Eastern Anatolia to exemplify many of the different aspects of collision tectonics, namely the formation of plateaux, thrust belts, foreland flexures, widespread foreland/hinterland deformation zones and orogenic collapse/distension zones. Eastern Anatolia is a 2 km high plateau bounded to the S by the southward-verging Bitlis Thrust Zone and to the N by the Pontide/Minor Caucasus Zone. It has developed as the surface expression of a zone of progressively thickening crust beginning about 12 Ma in the medial Miocene and has resulted from the squeezing and shortening of Eastern Anatolia between the Arabian and European Plates following the Serravallian demise of the last oceanic or quasi- oceanic tract between Arabia and Eurasia. Thickening of the crust to about 52 km has been accompanied by major strike-slip faulting on the rightqateral N Anatolian Transform Fault (NATF) and the left-lateral E Anatolian Transform Fault (EATF) which approximately bound an Anatolian Wedge that is being driven westwards to override the oceanic lithosphere of the Mediterranean along subduction zones from Cephalonia to Crete, and Rhodes to Cyprus. This neotectonic regime began about 12 Ma in Late Serravallian times with uplift from wide- spread littoral/neritic marine conditions to open seasonal wooded savanna with coiluvial, fluvial and limnic environments, and the deposition of the thick Tortonian Kythrean Flysch in the Eastern Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithospheric Folding and Sedimentary Basin Evolution: a Review and Analysis of Formation Mechanisms Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov
    Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: a review and analysis of formation mechanisms Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov To cite this version: Sierd Cloething, Evgenii Burov. Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: a review and analysis of formation mechanisms. Basin Research, Wiley, 2011, 23 (3), pp.257-290. 10.1111/j.1365- 2117.2010.00490.x. hal-00640964 HAL Id: hal-00640964 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640964 Submitted on 24 Nov 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Basin Research For Review Only Page 1 of 91 Basin Research 1 2 3 4 1 Lithospheric folding and sedimentary basin evolution: 5 6 2 a review and analysis of formation mechanisms 7 8 9 3 10 11 4 12 13 5 14 a,* b 15 6 Sierd Cloetingh and Evgenii Burov 16 7 17 18 8 aNetherlands ResearchFor Centre forReview Integrated Solid EarthOnly Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life 19 20 9 Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 21 10 22 23 11 bUniversité Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire de Tectonique, 4 Place Jussieu, 24 25 12 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin
    Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on January 26, 2010 Geological Society of America Bulletin Sevier Orogenic Belt in Nevada and Utah RICHARD LEE ARMSTRONG Geological Society of America Bulletin 1968;79;429-458 doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1968)79[429:SOBINA]2.0.CO;2 Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Geological Society of America Bulletin Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes Copyright © 1968, The Geological Society of America, Inc. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared by U.S.
    [Show full text]