DOCSLIB.ORG

Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments United States Department of Agriculture Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments Operational and Organizational Learning Report Fall 2016 Contents About This Report ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Operational and Organizational Learning Report ......................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 Part A: Operational Improvements ............................................................................................. 4 Type 3: Operational complexities and pressures ................................................................................. 4 Type 3: Looking at the big picture ........................................................................................................ 5 Type 3: The “go to” person .................................................................................................................. 6 Type 3: Building your team as you go .................................................................................................. 6 Building depth of qualifications and improving pre-season training ................................................... 7 Making sense of complex weather data .............................................................................................. 8 The time wedge and building a safety margin ..................................................................................... 8 Ingrained routines and the incentive to engage .................................................................................. 9 Structure protection ........................................................................................................................... 10 Uncertainty: non-routine responses are necessary ........................................................................... 11 New tools coming to assess risk ......................................................................................................... 11 Part B: Organizational Considerations ....................................................................................... 16 Policy, guidance, and leader’s intent ................................................................................................. 16 Greater emphasis on fire-resilient landscapes and communities ...................................................... 16 Intuitive benefits of communication and relationships ..................................................................... 17 Lessons from other high-risk professions .......................................................................................... 19 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 20 Safety Action Plan ....................................................................................................................................... 22 Operational (Field) Action Plan .................................................................................................. 22 Wildland fire communications ........................................................................................................... 22 Provide fire responders with better intelligence information ........................................................... 22 Scenario-based training ...................................................................................................................... 23 First-year firefighter and driver training standards ........................................................................... 23 Experiential emergency driving training ............................................................................................ 23 Develop ways to better support Type 3 Incident Commanders ........................................................ 24 Organizational (Leadership) Action Plan ................................................................................... 24 Develop and incorporate pre-fire risk and danger zone assessment tools ....................................... 24 Detect and study patterns within the current system: Conduct a broad spectrum learning review 24 Conduct a national wildland fire safety cultural change initiative ..................................................... 25 Develop the next level of long-term leader’s intent that provides increased margins of safety ...... 25 Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments Organizational Learning Report Page 1 of 28 Appendix ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Training and Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 26 Driver qualification ............................................................................................................................. 26 Quality of pre-season training ............................................................................................................ 26 Emergency driving training opportunity ............................................................................................ 27 No ethanol present before accident .................................................................................................. 28 Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments Organizational Learning Report Page 2 of 28 About This Report The Learning Review approach has been used to explore the Twisp River fatality incident. Several products were created as a result of this study: a status report,1 expanded narrative, this operational and organizational learning product, a field-learning (overview) video,2 and others. This report highlights how leadership has been proactively addressing safety issues, specifically, how the Safety Engagement sessions and Life First dialogues have already begun to address many of the systemic weaknesses that have been identified up to this point during the Twisp River Learning Review process. Recommendations are provided that explore new terrain, such as new ways to learn, the need to map our current system of work, and the need to improve change-recognition, sensemaking, and communication. We have found that our employees seem to value videos as well as written reports. So we supplemented this operational and organizational learning product (written for the national leadership audience) with videos that use plain language to introduce the concepts described in the report. These vignettes are embedded throughout this document. Some section headings are hyperlinks that take readers to a video that introduces that section. Vignettes are also embedded within the body of the document at strategic locations. Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments Operational and Organizational Learning Report Introduction On August 19, 2015, the Twisp River Fire in the state of Washington tragically cost the lives of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service firefighters Rick Wheeler, Andrew Zajac, and Tom Zbyszewski. The fire also severely injured another Forest Service firefighter and resulted in the burnover and injury of three Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) firefighters. As we started reviewing this event, it became apparent that more lives could have been lost. The Forest Service (FS), Okanogan County Fire District 6, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources (DNR) responded to Twisp River in a combined effort to suppress the fire. All three of these partners operate in the wildland fire environment under different mission goals and mandates. The interagency nature of this fire allowed for a deeper understanding of the situational complexity inherent in joint operations. As a result, the Twisp River Learning Review is the first interagency Coordinated Response Protocol and Learning Review. The Twisp River accident was not an individual or system failure but the effect of complex conditions. The individuals who worked at Twisp River carried out actions based on their training, knowledge, and experience. The system operated on standard protocols based on organizational, public, and firefighter values. However, the Twisp River individuals were placed in a position where they had to navigate multiple conflicting goals, rules, expressed leaders’ intentions, and laws. This is 1 Go to http://www.wildfirelessons.net/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=77159beb-18bd- bdbc-57ad-12fe11d38cd2&forceDialog=0 2 Go to https://youtu.be/1q1JlP11xbY Twisp River Fire Fatalities and Entrapments Organizational Learning Report Page 3 of 28 not a new or unique situation; it actually is highly representative of the complex nature of firefighting and is especially prevalent in the wildland-urban interface (WUI). The goal of this Learning Review was therefore to understand the complexities and situational factors that influenced decisions3 (click the link to view a vignette about decision making) and actions at Twisp River. Accident investigation in wildland fire responses historically focused on individuals as a way to recognize and control error. The local firefighting community was deeply concerned about the potential outcome of the investigative process. We made a concerted effort to help the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Wildland Fire Glossary
    Canadian Wildland Fire Glossary CIFFC Training Working Group December 10, 2020 i Preface The Canadian Wildland Fire Glossary provides the wildland A user's guide has been developed to provide guidance on fire community a single source for accurate and consistent the development and review of glossary entries. Within wildland fire and incident management terminology used this guide, users, working groups and committees can find by CIFFC and its' member agencies. instructions on the glossary process; tips for viewing the Consistent use of terminology promotes the efficient glossary on the CIFFC website; guidance for working groups sharing of information, facilitates analysis of data from and committees assigned ownership of glossary terms, disparate sources, improves data integrity, and maximizes including how to request, develop, and revise a glossary the use of shared resources. The glossary is not entry; technical requirements for complete glossary entries; intended to be an exhaustive list of all terms used and a list of contacts for support. by Provincial/Territorial and Federal fire management More specifically, this version reflects numerous additions, agencies. Most terms only have one definition. However, deletions, and edits after careful review from CIFFC agency in some cases a term may be used in differing contexts by staff and CIFFC Working Group members. New features various business areas so multiple definitions are warranted. include an improved font for readability and copying to word processors. Many Incident Command System The glossary takes a significant turn with this 2020 edition Unit Leader positions were added, as were numerous as it will now be updated annually to better reflect the mnemonics.
    [Show full text]
  • NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program Introduction and Overview
    U.S. Fire Administration NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program National Fire Incident Reporting System October 2006 National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) 5.0 Self-Study Program Department of Homeland Security United States Fire Administration National Fire Data Center Contents – NFIRS 5.0 Self-Study Program INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW ............................................ Intro-1 BASIC MODULE: NFIRS-1 ......................................................1-1 SUPPLEMENTAL FORM: NFIRS-1S ..............................................1S-1 FIRE MODULE: NFIRS-2 .......................................................2-1 STRUCTURE FIRE MODULE: NFIRS-3 ........................................... .3-1 CIVILIAN FIRE CASUALTY MODULE: NFIRS-4 ......................................4-1 FIRE SERVICE CASUALTY MODULE: NFIRS-5 .......................................5-1 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (EMS) MODULE: NFIRS-6 .......................... .6-1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MODULE: NFIRS-7 ..................................... .7-1 WILDLAND FIRE MODULE: NFIRS-8 ............................................ .8-1 APPARATUS OR RESOURCES MODULE: NFIRS-9 ....................................9-1 PERSONNEL MODULE: NFIRS-10 ...............................................10-1 ARSON & JUVENILE FIRESETTER MODULE: NFIRS-11 ...............................11-1 SUMMARY AND WRAP UP ....................................................12-1 APPENDIX A: SCENARIO ANSWERS ..................................... APPENDIX A-1 APPENDIX B: PRETEST ANSWERS .......................................APPENDIX
    [Show full text]
  • Doi105-Archived.Pdf
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Certification of Position Approval for Retirement Under 5 use§ 8336(c) and§ 8412(d) [ x] Approved under the Civil Service Retirement System, 5 USC§ 8336(c) [ x] Approved under the Federal Employees Retirement System, 5 USC§ 8412(d) Category of Coverage: Primary/Rigorous (Firefighter), Bureau: Any DOI Bureau may use tru.s Standard PD and must use the Standard PD Number Classification Title: Range/Forestry Technician (Fire) Organization Title: Senior Wildland Firefighter Standard Position Number: DO1105 Series and Grade: GS-0455/0462-04/05 RECOMMENDATION FOR COVERAGE: Primary/Rigorous Firefighter coverage is recommended under both CSRS and FERS. This position is located on a wildland fire crew as.a senior crewmember within the fire management organization. The purpose of the position is wildland fire suppression/management/control, as a specialized firefighter on an engine, helitack module, or hand crew with responsibility for the operation and maintenance of specialized tools or equipment. Other wildland fire related duties may involve fire prevention, patrol, detection, or prescribed burning. The incumbent may be assigned for varying periods of time into one or more types of positions within the wildfire program where the individual's specialized skills are required. Primary duties are directly connected with the control and extinguishment of fires and/or maintaining and using firefighter apparatus and equipment. The duties of this position are so rigorous that employment is limited to young and physically vigorous individuals who must meet established age and physical qualification requirements. .. a4..zo10 Date ~ - 5 -/~ T Date ARCHIVED Date ~/cJro E, Chief, Branch ofWildland Fire Management, BIA Date 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt County Fire Services
    Humboldt County Fire Services FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION OF HUMBOLDT COUNTY Annual Report 2011 To: Humboldt County Board of Supervisors An overview of the Humboldt County Fire Service of 2011 The Fire Service in Humboldt County continues to grow in a positive direction, constantly working towards the goal of promoting county‐wide adoption of procedures and policies through the Fire Chief’s Association with input and regulation from the various groups with‐in such as the Training Instructors, Fire Prevention Officers and the Fire/Arson Investigation Unit. This positive and forward direction is an indication of the great working relationships that have developed among the various departments over the years, and that continues to improve, a feat that is not easy in such a rural setting. These relationships have allowed the fire agencies to foster a team approach both from an operational and an administrative stand point. The effort of forming fire districts for some of the volunteer fire companies with‐in the county, along with the modification of district boundaries in an attempt to provide a better system of protection for many of the Counties’ residents, continues with the help of the Fire Safe Council and County Planning with the support of the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors. The Fire Chief’s Association would like to acknowledge their appreciation of that consideration and support from the Board. At the same time the Chief’s Association recognizes that the future of the fire service in Humboldt County is dependent upon the Board’s continued support. With fees now being levied by the State in the way of “Fire Prevention Fees” to the residents residing in State Responsibility Areas, there is major concern that funding for many of the rural departments will suffer which makes support by the Board of Supervisors a critical factor in their very survival.
    [Show full text]
  • To Provide Procedures and Guidelines for Personnel Responding to and Operating at Working Structure Fire Incidents
    I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose: To provide procedures and guidelines for personnel responding to and operating at working structure fire incidents. B. Scope: This instruction applies to all personnel responsible for performing tasks in the operational area of a structure fire. C. Author: The chief deputy of Emergency Operations is responsible for the content, revision, and annual review of this instruction. D. Definitions: See Appendix I E. Underwriters Lab (UL) studies: See Appendix II F. Operational Modes: See Appendix III II. RESPONSIBILITY A. The first arriving company officer is responsible for: 1. Performing an initial size-up. 2. Developing a mental incident action plan (IAP) to determine the initial operational mode. 3. Transmitting the size-up radio report to the Los Angeles Communications Center (LACC). 4. Taking initial actions consistent with the incident priorities and tactical operations of the incident. 5. Considering the use of transitional attack when operating in the offensive mode and with fire showing. 6. Establishing the Incident Command System (ICS). 08/13/2014 1 of 23 V11-C3-S2 Structure Fires Structure Firefighting Standard Operating Procedures B. The incident commander (IC) is responsible for: 1. Overall management of the incident. 2. Identifying incident objectives. 3. Communicating the current operational mode and providing status reports to LACC. C. The incident safety officer is responsible for: 1. Identifying and evaluating hazards, knowing the current operational mode, and advising the IC in the area of personnel safety. The safety officer has the authority to alter, suspend, or terminate any unsafe activity. The safety officer investigates accidents and near misses involving Department personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations
    Executive Summary of Changes - Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations 2019 Chapter 1 – Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy and Doctrine Overview • Changed chapter title from “Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy Overview” to “Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy and Doctrine Overview.” • Clarified text under subheading “Guiding Principles of the Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy,” 7., regarding FMPs and activities incorporate firefighter exposure, public health, compliance with Clean Air Act and environment quality considerations. • Under heading “Definitions”: o Clarified “Wildland Fire” as a general term describing any non-structure fire that occurs in the wildland. o Clarified “Suppression” as all the work of extinguishing a fire or confining fire spread. o Clarified “Protection” as the actions taken to mitigate the adverse effects of fire on environmental, social, political, and economical effects of fire. o Clarified “Prescribed Fire” as a wildland fire originating from a planned ignition to meet specific objectives identified in a written, approved, prescribed fire plan for which NEPA requirements (where applicable) have been met prior to ignition. o Inserted “National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS),” “Criteria Pollutants,” “State Implementation Plan (SIP),” “Federal Implementation Plan (FIP),” “Attainment Area,” “Nonattainment Area,” “Maintenance Area,” and associated text. Chapter 2 – BLM • Clarified under heading “Fire and Aviation Directorate” that the BLM Fire and Aviation Directorate
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Department of Forestry
    STATE OF OREGON POSITION DESCRIPTION Position Revised Date: 04/17/2019 This position is: Classified Agency: Oregon Department of Forestry Unclassified Executive Service Facility: Central Oregon District, John Day Unit Mgmt Svc - Supervisory Mgmt Svc - Managerial New Revised Mgmt Svc - Confidential SECTION 1. POSITION INFORMATION a. Classification Title: Wildland Fire Suppression Specialist b. Classification No: 8255 c. Effective Date: 6/03/2019 d. Position No: e. Working Title: Firefighter f. Agency No: 49999 g. Section Title: Protection h. Employee Name: i. Work Location (City-County): John Day Grant County j. Supervisor Name (optional): k. Position: Permanent Seasonal Limited duration Academic Year Full Time Part Time Intermittent Job Share l. FLSA: Exempt If Exempt: Executive m. Eligible for Overtime: Yes Non-Exempt Professional No Administrative SECTION 2. PROGRAM AND POSITION INFORMATION a. Describe the program in which this position exists. Include program purpose, who’s affected, size, and scope. Include relationship to agency mission. This position exists within the Protection from Fire Program, which protects 1.6 million acres of Federal, State, county, municipal, and private lands in Grant, Harney, Morrow, Wheeler, and Gilliam Counties. Program objectives are to minimize fire damage and acres burned, commensurate with the 10-year average. Activities are coordinated with other agencies and industry to avoid duplication and waste of resources whenever possible. This position is directly responsible to the Wildland Fire Supervisor for helping to achieve District, Area, and Department-wide goals and objectives at the unit level of operation. b. Describe the primary purpose of this position, and how it functions within this program.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Fire Assignment
    Cumberland County Standard Operating Guideline Order of Apparatus Arrival - Structural Fire Assignment Purpose: To establish a standard method for fire apparatus arrival and positioning at structure fire incidents. All personnel must use the procedures below during structure firefighting operations. It is important to note that unless otherwise directed by the Incident Commander you must follow this apparatus positioning guideline. Unit Officers must LIMIT radio transmissions to critical fire ground information. Single units should routinely not contact the Incident Commander for “instructions and assignments”. Procedure: While enroute to the incident scene Unit Officers must maintain situational awareness of their specific location and order of apparatus arrival. Personnel must not take action until their Unit Officer in charge directs them to do so. All drivers who are not specifically assigned to apparatus operations will assemble with their crew. Fire ground discipline is critical during all incident responses. In addition to the listed responsibilities Unit Officers must: A. Maintain crew integrity B. Ensure that personnel and apparatus take their assigned positions C. Follow this and other applicable policies, including the Incident Command System. The IC may modify these assignments as necessary. First Due Engine 1. Unit Responsibilities Initiate water supply by laying a supply line from the most suitable water supply, beginning a split lay or give instructions for reverse lay as necessary. Position the engine on Side Alpha, reserving adequate space for the aerial unit to position. Connect to the building standpipe and/or sprinkler system, if so equipped, on or closest to Side Alpha. Activate VTAC for optimal portable radio coverage.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure Fires in Dormitories, Fraternities, Sororities and Barracks
    STRUCTURE FIRES IN DORMITORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES AND BARRACKS Jennifer D. Flynn August 2009 National Fire Protection Association Fire Analysis and Research Division STRUCTURE FIRES IN DORMITORIES, FRATERNITIES, SORORITIES AND BARRACKS Jennifer D. Flynn August 2009 National Fire Protection Association Fire Analysis and Research Division Abstract In 2003-2006, U.S. fire departments responded to an estimated annual average of 3,570 structure fires in dormitories, fraternities, sororities, and barracks. These fires caused an annual average of 7 civilian deaths, 54 civilian fire injuries, and $29.4 million in direct property damage. Fires in these properties accounted for 0.7% of all reported structure fires within the same time period. These estimates are based on data from the U.S. Fire Administration’s (USFA) National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) and the National Fire Protection Association’s (NFPA) annual fire department experience survey. Cooking equipment was involved in 75% of reported structure fires. Only 5% of fires in these properties began in the bedroom, but these fires accounted for 62% of the civilian deaths and 26% of civilian fire injuries. Fires in dormitories, fraternities, sororities, and barracks are more common during the evening hours, between 5 p.m. and 11 p.m., and on weekends. Keywords: fire statistics, dormitory fires, fraternity fires, sorority fires, barrack fires Acknowledgements The National Fire Protection Association thanks all the fire departments and state fire authorities who participate in the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS) and the annual NFPA fire experience survey. These firefighters are the original sources of the detailed data that make this analysis possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicles for Fire Management
    Project Number 48 June 1990 Vehicles for Fire Management Roscommon Equipment Center Northeast Forest Fire Supervisors In Cooperation with Michigan's Forest Fire Experiment Station Acknowledgements Participation in the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) Fire Equipment Working Team (FEWT) Engine Study Subcommittee contributed greatly to this report. Members of that subcommittee during its Phase I - Cab & Chassis portion included: J.P. Greene (Florida) Charles Norberg (General Services Administration) Jim Stumpf(USFS) Ted Rex (BLM) Tom Uphill (USFS) Frank Winer (USFS) Brian Hutchins (Michigan) Larry Segretto (Fonnerly BLM) Bill Legan (Ventura Co. FD) Inquires, comments and suggestions regarding this project may be directed to: Fire Protection Roscommon Equipment Center U.S. Forest Service, NA c/o Forest Fire Experiment Station 5 Radnor Corporate Center, Suite 200 P.O. Box 68 100 Matsonford Road Roscommon, MI 48653 Radnor, PA 19087 Disclaimer Infonnation contained in this report has been developed for the guidance of the member states, provinces and Federal agencies. The use of trade, firm or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the user. Such use does not constitute an official evaluation, conclusion, recommendation, endorsement or approval of any product or service to the exclusion ofothers which may be suitable. Table o_f Contents Introduction 1 Definitions 1 Payload and Weight Ratings: ............................................................................................... 1 Dimensional Definitions:
    [Show full text]
  • Commonly Used Fire Terminology.Pdf
    - Commonly Used Fire Department Terminology - Air Attack: Fixed-wing aircraft that directs air tanker drops on a wildland fire. The air attack orbits above all air tankers and copters and serves as an “eye in the sky” over the incident. The air attack includes the pilot and the air attack supervisor and communicates directly with the ground Incident Commander and other aircraft assigned to the incident; including media helicopters. Air Tanker: Fire retardant-dropping, fixed-wing aircraft. Air tankers are “typed” similar to engines, based upon the needs of the incident and capability. Backfire: A fire set along the inner edge of a fire line to consume the fuel in the path of a wildfire or change the direction of force of the fire's convection column Battalion: A geographic area consisting of one or more stations supervised by a Battalion Chief. Brush Engine: A mobile piece of fire equipment which carries hose, water and a pump, and is specially designed for off road wildland firefighting. CAD: Computer Aided Dispatch System. Used by Public Safety Communications Officers in the Emergency Command Center. This automated system verifies address information, recommends units to respond based upon the “closest resource concept”, time-stamps all activities tied to the incident (report time, response and on-scene time and other timekeeping functions). Contained: The status of a wildfire suppression action signifying that a control line has been completed around the fire, and any associated spot fires, which can reasonably be expected to stop the fire’s spread. Controlled: The completion of control line around a fire, any spot fires therefrom, and any interior islands to be saved; burned out any unburned area adjacent to the fire side of the control lines; and cool down all hot spots that are immediate threats to the control line, until the lines can reasonably be expected to hold under the foreseeable conditions.
    [Show full text]