The Holy Hush of Ancient Sacrifice: an Analysis of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Holy Hush of Ancient Sacrifice: an Analysis of The THE HOLY HUSH OF ANCIENT SACRIFICE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE NON-CENTRALIZED CULT IN IRON AGE ISRAEL by ERIC MERLE CARLSON (Under the Direction of David S. Williams) ABSTRACT The present study looks at various cult practices within Iron Age Israel that took place outside the environs of the Temple in Jerusalem. The focus will be on rituals not characterized by syncretism, but which on the whole lie within the parameters of Israelite orthodoxy. Chapters one and two give an overview of the problem and provide a synopsis of the history of research into the Deuteronomist, the biblical writer/editor most responsible for a negative view of the high places. Chapters three through six examine typical non-centralized rites, starting at the domestic setting and moving inward through township and regional practices to those cultic ceremonies performed just outside the Temple precincts. Chapters seven through ten outline the origins of the dominant priestly line and the tensions between that priesthood and the Davidic dynasty, the northern cult, and the Writing Prophets, arising from differences concerning faithfulness to the covenant with YHWH. INDEX WORDS: Cult, Ritual, Purification, Passover, Unleavened Bread, Broken- Necked Heifer, High Places, Red Heifer, Zadokites, Jeroboam I, Josiah’s Reform, Centralization, Prophetic Critique THE HOLY HUSH OF ANCIENT SACRIFICE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE NON-CENTRALIZED CULT IN IRON AGE ISRAEL by ERIC MERLE CARLSON A. A., Black Hawk College, 1978 B. A., Carthage College, 1980 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Eric Merle Carlson All Rights Reserved THE HOLY HUSH OF ANCIENT SACRIFICE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE NON-CENTRALIZED CULT IN IRON AGE ISRAEL by ERIC MERLE CARLSON Approved: Major Professor: David S. Williams Committee: Theodore J. Lewis Carolyn J. Medine William L. Power Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2004 iv Complacencies of the peignoir, and late Coffee and oranges in a sunny chair And the green freedom of a cockatoo Upon a rug mingle to dissipate The holy hush of ancient sacrifice. She dreams a little, and she feels the dark Encroachment of that old catastrophe As a calm darkens among water-lights. The pungent oranges and bright, green wings Seem things in some procession of the dead Winding across wide water, without sound. The day is like wide water, without sound. Stilled for the passing of her dreaming feet Over the seas, to silent Palestine… from Sunday Morning— by Wallace Stevens v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Perfunctory expressions of thanks have always come easily to me. Unless I miss my guess, most of us have a more difficult time paying our respects to those whom we owe deeper debts. While growing up in Illinois, I was surrounded by a truly wonderful family: sharp, fun-loving, and compassionate. We were much more than siblings; we were the closest of friends. We still are to this day. My proudest thoughts center on being my mother’s child, the son of my late father. Throughout my years of schooling, I have been blessed with talented, dedicated, caring teachers who have allowed me to share their vision if but for a little while. And oh, what friends I have had! May God bless every single one of them; they have made my life a cherished possession I clutch close to my heart. I am thankful for the beautifully eccentric community of people at my house church who ask the tough questions, never settle for settled answers, and love unconditionally. (If Peabody Hall ever caught on how many from such a minute assemblage have graced its classrooms, some kind of award would need to be established in our honor!) I thank you all for an atmosphere that provides fresh air in my lungs week after week. I am thankful to those who read all or portions of my thesis, providing essential insight and correction: Betsy, Ben, Wayne, Keith, and Keith. You made my job so much easier! Also, to Charlise, Matt, and Ryan, who offered to help, I am deeply grateful. I am thankful to the graduate students who went through the program at the same time as I: my fellow-religionists Christi, Matthew, and Jon, as well as the philosophers vi Dan, Chad, and Larry. And thanks to the many gracious and teachable students who sat under my instruction. I am thankful to Zinetta and Janine, who—as everyone is aware—run the Religion Department. Competence and zeal personified! Thank you. I am thankful to the faculty: to Dr. Slater, for his collegial attitudes, infectious sense of humor, and sincere encouragement; to Dr. Honerkamp, for his tender heart for the world and his patience with me; to Dr. Medine, for her incisive mind and helpful personality; to Dr. Power, for his warmth and his command of his field; and to Dr. Williams, for his incredible teaching ability. I will remember “not to be a salmon” but to swim with the current. Leaving the deepest debts for last, I am thankful to Dr. Ted Lewis, who directed this thesis. For your precipitous standards and for the firm confidence that your students can actually attain those heights, I thank you. Not that I have reached them, mind you. But I can now envision reaching them. You are a man of faith and of integrity, whom I will be proud to attempt to emulate. To my best friend, my girlfriend, Elizabeth Winans: thanks for your loyal prayers, your abiding respect, and your diligent efforts on my behalf (typing, proofreading, emailing). Thanks for sharing with me the wonder that you are. I treasure you! And finally, let me say what an awesome privilege it is for me to study the Hebrew Bible. Religion is much more than an academic pursuit for me: This is the conduit through which my whole life pours. It is a sacramental task to learn from the living God, to pursue his truths. I cannot imagine doing anything else. Soli Deo Gloria! vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................v CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................1 The Structure of the Present Study...................................................................2 The Deuteronomist’s Agenda...........................................................................4 The Home Front: Domestic and Village Practices...........................................7 Regional Rites: Altars and High Places ...........................................................7 Just Outside the Temple: Purification Rituals..................................................9 Issues of Validity: The Priority of Jerusalem.................................................10 Critics of the Non-Centralized Cult................................................................11 Critics of the Central Cult ..............................................................................12 2 HISTORY OF RESEARCH ...........................................................................14 The Göttingen School.....................................................................................16 Back to One Editor.........................................................................................17 The Dual Redaction Hypothesis.....................................................................18 The Hezekiah Edition.....................................................................................20 3 THE PASSOVER AND UNLEAVENED BREAD.......................................22 Ancient Israel’s Economy: Pastoral or Agricultural?.....................................24 Harvest Festivals ............................................................................................25 Passover and Calendars..................................................................................26 The Rise of “Unleavened Bread” ...................................................................27 The Impact of Passover ..................................................................................30 viii Questioned Origins.........................................................................................31 The Merging of Traditions .............................................................................33 Analysis..........................................................................................................35 4 THE BROKEN-NECKED HEIFER...............................................................38 The Mere Presence of Priests .........................................................................39 The Town Elders ............................................................................................41 A Borrowed Rite?...........................................................................................43 A Sacred Space?.............................................................................................45 Repenting of Spilled Blood ............................................................................45 Ritual Purification with Water .......................................................................47 Theoretical Implications.................................................................................48 5 THE LEGITIMACY OF ISRAELITE HIGH PLACES.................................52 Etymology of bāmâ ........................................................................................54 Home of the Gods—Mountains and
Recommended publications
  • A Liturgy for the Church
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Honors Program Senior Projects WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship Spring 2003 The Work of the People: A Liturgy for the Church Taylor Swedberg Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors Part of the Liturgy and Worship Commons Recommended Citation Swedberg, Taylor, "The Work of the People: A Liturgy for the Church" (2003). WWU Honors Program Senior Projects. 337. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/337 This Project is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Honors Program Senior Projects by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Wark of the People A Liturgy for the Church By Taylor Swedberg Dr. Tom Moore, Advisor June 3, 2003 :n~WESTERN - WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY An equal opportunity w1iversity Honors Program Bellingham, Washington 98225-9089 (360)650-3034 Fax (360) 650-7305 HONORS THESIS In presenting this Honors paper in partial requirements for a bachelor's degree at Western Washington University, I agree that the library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes. It is understood that any publication of this thesis for commercial purposes or for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature Date b ~3 - 03 Literally, the word "liturgy" means "the work of the people." It is a word commonly used to describe the organization of how to celebrate the Eucharist.
    [Show full text]
  • Asherah in the Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Literature Author(S): John Day Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol
    Asherah in the Hebrew Bible and Northwest Semitic Literature Author(s): John Day Source: Journal of Biblical Literature, Vol. 105, No. 3 (Sep., 1986), pp. 385-408 Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3260509 . Accessed: 11/05/2013 22:44 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Biblical Literature. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 143.207.2.50 on Sat, 11 May 2013 22:44:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions JBL 105/3 (1986) 385-408 ASHERAH IN THE HEBREW BIBLE AND NORTHWEST SEMITIC LITERATURE* JOHN DAY Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford University, England, OX2 6QA The late lamented Mitchell Dahood was noted for the use he made of the Ugaritic and other Northwest Semitic texts in the interpretation of the Hebrew Bible. Although many of his views are open to question, it is indisputable that the Ugaritic and other Northwest Semitic texts have revolutionized our understanding of the Bible. One matter in which this is certainly the case is the subject of this paper, Asherah.' Until the discovery of the Ugaritic texts in 1929 and subsequent years it was common for scholars to deny the very existence of the goddess Asherah, whether in or outside the Bible, and many of those who did accept her existence wrongly equated her with Astarte.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Defeats the Dragon
    THE REVELATION OF JOHN Bible Study 31 Study by Lorin L Cranford Text: Rev. 12:7-12 All rights reserved © QUICK LINKS 1. What the text meant. Exegesis of the Text: Historical Aspects: A. War between Michael and Satan, vv. 7-9 External History B. Declaration of victory, vv. 10-12 Internal History Literary Aspects: Genre 2. What the text means. Literary Setting Literary Structure Michael Defeats the Dragon Greek NT Gute Nachricht Bibel NRSV NLT 7 Καὶ ἐγένετο πόλεμος ἐν 7 Dann brach im Himmel 7 And war broke out in 7 Then there was war τῷ οὐρανῷ, ὁ Μιχαὴλ καὶ οἱ ein Krieg aus. Michael mit heaven; Michael and his an- in heaven. Michael and the ἄγγελοι αὐτοῦ τοῦ πολεμῆσαι seinen Engeln kämpfte gegen gels fought against the drag- angels under his command μετὰ τοῦ δράκοντος. καὶ ὁ den Drachen. Der Drache mit on. The dragon and his angels fought the dragon and his δράκων ἐπολέμησεν καὶ οἱ seinen Engeln wehrte sich; 8 fought back, 8 but they were angels. 8 And the dragon ἄγγελοι αὐτοῦ, 8 καὶ οὐκ aber er konnte nicht stand- defeated, and there was no lost the battle and was forced ἴσχυσεν οὐδὲ τόπος εὑρέθη halten. Samt seinen Engeln longer any place for them in out of heaven. 9 This great αὐτῶν ἔτι ἐν τῷ οὐρανῷ. musste er seinen Platz im heaven. 9 The great dragon dragon -- the ancient serpent 9 καὶ ἐβλήθη ὁ δράκων ὁ Himmel räumen. 9 Der große was thrown down, that ancient called the Devil, or Satan, μέγας, ὁ ὄφις ὁ ἀρχαῖος, ὁ Drache wurde hinunterg- serpent, who is called the the one deceiving the whole καλούμενος Διάβολος καὶ estürzt! Er ist die alte Sch- Devil and Satan, the deceiver world -- was thrown down to ὁ Σατανᾶς, ὁ πλανῶν τὴν lange, die auch Teufel oder of the whole world—he was the earth with all his angels.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Now It Came to Pass, When Adonizedek King Of
    Joshua 10 1 ,Now it came to pass . ־ אֶ ת ְיהֻשַׁע לָכַ ד ־ ִכּי יְרוּשָׁלַ ִם ֶמֶלך ֲאֹדִני־ֶצֶדק ִכְשֹׁמַע ַוְיִהי 1: 10 u·iei k·shmo adni-tzdq mlk irushlm ki - lkd ieusho ath - when Adonizedek king of and·he-is-becoming as·to-hear-of Adoni-Zedek king-of Jerusalem that he-seized Joshua » Jerusalem had heard how Joshua had taken Ai, and had utterly destroyed it; as he had done to Jericho and לָעַ י עָשָׂ ה ־ כֵּ ן וְּלַמְלָכּהּ ִליִריח עָשָׂ ה כַּאֲשֶׁ ר ַוַיֲּחִריָמהּ ָהַעי e·oi u·ichrim·e k·ashr oshe l·irichu u·l·mlk·e kn - oshe l·oi her king, so he had done to the·Ai and·he-is-cdooming·her as·which he-did to·Jericho and·to·king-of·her so he-did to·Ai Ai and her king; and how the inhabitants of Gibeon ,had made peace with Israel ִיְשָׂרֵאל ־ אֶ ת ִגְבען ֹיְשֵׁבי ִהְשִׁלימוּ ְוִכי וְּלַמְלָכּהּ u·l·mlk·e u·ki eshlimu ishbi gboun ath - ishral and were among them; and·to·king-of·her and·that they-cmade -peace ones-dwelling-of Gibeon with Israel : ְבִּקְרָבּם ַוִיְּהיוּ u·ieiu b·qrb·m : and·they-are-becoming in·within-of·them 2 ,That they feared greatly ַהַמְּמָלָכה ָעֵרי ְכַּאַחת ִגְּבען גְּדלָ ה ִעיר ִכּי ְמֹאד ַוִיּיְראוּ 2: 10 u·iirau mad ki oir gdule gboun k·achth ori e·mmlke because Gibeon [was] a and·they-are-fearing exceedingly that city great Gibeon as·one-of cities-of the·kingdom great city, as one of the royal cities, and because it [was] greater than Ai, and [all the men thereof [were : ִגֹּבִּרים ֲאָנֶשׁיָה ־ ְוָכל ָהַעי ־ ִמן גְדלָ ה ִהיא ְוִכי u·ki eia gdule mn - e·oi u·kl - anshi·e gbrim : mighty.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 11 ELIJAH DEFEATS 450 PROPHETS of BAAL with 1 PRAYER Memory Verse: Psalm 54:1-2 God, Save Me Because of Who You Are
    Q7 – God is Good at Victory! Parent Teaching Guide God wins the victory! We are studying Old Testament battle stories. These stories show us over and over again that God has the power and God wins the victory for His people when they follow His commandments (have faith in Him). We will study Jesus’ triumph over death, which brings us the victory of salvation. We can be victorious if we remain faithful to God and to the sacrifice of His son. God never promises that our lives will be easy. He does promise us victory through Christ if we trust Him. Date: Dec 13-19, 2020 Lesson 11 ELIJAH DEFEATS 450 PROPHETS OF BAAL WITH 1 PRAYER Memory Verse: Psalm 54:1-2 God, save me because of who You are. By Your strength show that I am innocent. Hear my prayer, God. Listen to what I say. Text: 1 Kings 18 King Ahab and Queen Jezebel were very wicked. They did not worship God, they worshiped Baal. When the prophet Elijah went to them and told them of their sin, they thought the prophets of Baal could defeat God’s prophet. God was able to light the alter even after it had been soaked with water. Baal could not. Isn’t God powerful! Talk to your child about God’s power. He can defeat any false god is we only let him. If we pray and let Him have control, He will defeat our enemies and keep us safe. Facts to Know PRAISE & PRAYER Show pictures of people praying.
    [Show full text]
  • Idolatry in the Ancient Near East1
    Idolatry in the Ancient Near East1 Ancient Near Eastern Pantheons Ammonite Pantheon The chief god was Moloch/Molech/Milcom. Assyrian Pantheon The chief god was Asshur. Babylonian Pantheon At Lagash - Anu, the god of heaven and his wife Antu. At Eridu - Enlil, god of earth who was later succeeded by Marduk, and his wife Damkina. Marduk was their son. Other gods included: Sin, the moon god; Ningal, wife of Sin; Ishtar, the fertility goddess and her husband Tammuz; Allatu, goddess of the underworld ocean; Nabu, the patron of science/learning and Nusku, god of fire. Canaanite Pantheon The Canaanites borrowed heavily from the Assyrians. According to Ugaritic literature, the Canaanite pantheon was headed by El, the creator god, whose wife was Asherah. Their offspring were Baal, Anath (The OT indicates that Ashtoreth, a.k.a. Ishtar, was Baal’s wife), Mot & Ashtoreth. Dagon, Resheph, Shulman and Koshar were other gods of this pantheon. The cultic practices included animal sacrifices at high places; sacred groves, trees or carved wooden images of Asherah. Divination, snake worship and ritual prostitution were practiced. Sexual rites were supposed to ensure fertility of people, animals and lands. Edomite Pantheon The primary Edomite deity was Qos (a.k.a. Quas). Many Edomite personal names included Qos in the suffix much like YHWH is used in Hebrew names. Egyptian Pantheon2 Egyptian religion was never unified. Typically deities were prominent by locale. Only priests worshipped in the temples of the great gods and only when the gods were on parade did the populace get to worship them. These 'great gods' were treated like human kings by the priesthood: awakened in the morning with song; washed and dressed the image; served breakfast, lunch and dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Praying for Judgment of the Canaanites
    Abraham Praying For Judgment Of The Canaanites Romantic Matthaeus herd, his Aries hoot gleans misguidedly. Overfond and encomiastic Zeus litters while coccal Thurstan commix her subtexts negatively and neighs imperfectly. Leggier Aubert stabilise his citterns disinherit tumultuously. They would continue the canaanites for abraham praying of the judgment against you are destroyed for the hittite suzerainty treaties and gave lot failed they migrated with Since then abraham pray for judgment on his female goat, canaanites differed from a wife did? The selecting of favorites was tragic in the family of Isaac. According to purchase the bible reveals his the abraham praying for judgment of canaanites lived. All yours as we find the will very same year who could make myself to spell the canaanites for abraham praying of judgment the tax collectors do to bring him, was little more than a direct effort. There was polygamous relationship with perfumes, unto the praying for rachel: and it on constant fellowship is impossible. Here it not fair to the men, and gomorrah had sent us that the day of god protects those of those. As well Lord commanded his servant Moses, so Moses commanded Joshua and Joshua did hear; he let nothing undone of laptop that present Lord commanded aoses. Hadad died, and Samlah of Masrekah succeeded him while king. Knowing that camels were canaanites was involved. Once the cleansing of the sanctuary is finished, the sin and uncleanness ofthe Israelites are placed on the goat for and sent to the wilderness. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Site 590
    589 Bull Site 590 Bul sacrifice that precedes Balaam’s second oracle The Hebrew term bûl denotes the second month of (Num 23 : 30). the Canaanite agricultural calendar, as attested in The term šôr, often translated “ox,” has refer- Phoenician inscriptions (KAI 14 : 1; 32 : 1; 38 : 2). In ence to a bull image in Ps 106 : 20. The term is cog- the Bible, the month of Bul is only mentioned once, nate to Ugaritic ßtr, found as an epithet of El (e.g., in the account of Solomon building the temple KTU 1.1 iii 26). Tur-Sinai has proposed that this ep- (1 Kgs 6 : 38). ithet underlies Hos 8 : 6, where, instead of kî mîyis´ - Christoph Berner ra¯ e¯ l, he reads kî mî sˇo¯ r eˇl, “For who is the Bull El” See also /Calendars (Tur Sinai: 31). On the basis of Ugaritic literature, it is now gen- erally recognized that the appellative abbîr yaa˘qob/ Bulgakov, Mikhail Afanasievich yis´ ra¯ e¯ l, traditionally translated “mighty one of A medical doctor by training, in the 1920s M. A. Jacob/Israel,” is derived from bull imagery. Ugaritic Bulgakov (1891–1940) began to publish satirical ibr clearly means bull (Olmo Lete: 10). Miller (421) sketches and short stories. His initial successes as a has argued that this imagery was meant to convey playwright and novelist were drastically curtailed strength and power. As such, the translation by increasing Soviet political censorship in the late “mighty one” for abbîr is appropriate. Given all of 1920s and 1930s. Bulgakov devoted the final years the bull imagery associated with El and Baal, it is of his life to the writing of the satirical fantasy Mas- likely that this is the association underlying the calf ter i Margarita (The Master and Margarita), which was (e¯ gel) images forged in the desert in Exod 32 : 4 as finally published only in 1966–67.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotics and Symbolism in the Orthodox Church Architecture
    Special Issue INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND August 2016 CULTURAL STUDIES ISSN 2356-5926 Semiotics and Symbolism in the Orthodox Church Architecture Liliya R. Akhmetova Kazan Federal University, Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication named after Leo Tolstoy, Tatarstan Str.2, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia Elmira U. Abdulkadyrova Kazan Federal University, Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication named after Leo Tolstoy, Tatarstan Str.2, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia Irina M. Maiorova Kazan Federal University, Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication named after Leo Tolstoy, Tatarstan Str.2, Kazan, Tatarstan, Russia Abstract The movement on restoration of the temples destroyed in Soviet period has begun from below, later local authorities became involved and, at last, the state program on restoration of temples has been adopted. There is a process of returning to the roots, to traditions: not only Orthodox churches, but also Catholic, Buddhist, as well as mosques are being restored. Each temple embodies religious idea in the architecture. Each architectural element comprises a certain symbol. The symbolics in architecture of an Orthodox church is difficult and many- sided. It expresses what directly cannot be represented - it is the terrestrial embodiment of the heavenly, spiritual, non hand-made, sacral. Unlike Catholic temples built according to the art style dominating during construction the Orthodox churches are built according to Orthodoxy symbolics. Thus, each element of an Orthodox church bears some information on the one the temple is devoted to, on some lines of the Orthodoxy and on many other aspects. The architecture as any other art form, has its own language - it is the language of architectural forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • King David's Double Recognition at Hebron According to Josephus
    RCatT XXXI/2 (2006) 269-281 © Facultat de Teologia de Catalunya KING DAVID’S DOUBLE RECOGNITION AT HEBRON ACCORDING TO JOSEPHUS Christopher BEGG 1. Introduction 2 Sam 5,1-3 and 1 Chr 11,1-3 tell a largely similar story of David’s recogni- tion as king by a group of Israelites at Hebron. Whereas this is the only such happening in Samuel, the Chronicler goes on, after an extended interlude (11,4– 12,22) dealing with other matters,1 to relate a similar such happening in 12,23- 40. Josephus too, in his Antiquitates judaicae (hereafter Ant. 7.53-60)2 narrates a two-stage pan-Israelite acclamation of David’s kingship at Hebron. In contrast to the Chronicler, however, the historian recounts the two moments of the king’s recognition back-to-back, just as his presentation of both moments evidences numerous differences vis-à-vis the biblical account(s). In this essay then I wish to focus on the Josephan version of David’s encounters with the Israelites who come to him at Hebron. More specifically, my study will address several wider questions: (1) In recounting the initial Hebron happening did Josephus draw on both (slightly different) accounts in 2 Sam 5,1-3 and 1 Chr 11,1-3 or rather did he limit himself to one of these to the exclusion of the other? (2) Can anything be ascertained about the text-form(s) of 2 Sam 5,1-3 and/or 1 Chr 11,1-3; 12,23- 40 used by Josephus? And (3) What sort of rewriting techniques has Josephus 1.
    [Show full text]