AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL Annual Report for 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL Annual Report for 2020 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL Annual Report for 2020 NASA AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 Dr. Patricia Sanders, Chair January 1, 2021 The Honorable Jim Bridenstine Administrator National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 Dear Mr. Bridenstine: Pursuant to Section 106(b) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act 2005 (P.L. 109-155), the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) is pleased to submit the ASAP Annual Report for 2020 to the U.S. Congress and to the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Report is based on the Panel’s 2020 fact-finding; quarterly public meetings; direct observations of NASA operations and decision-making; discussions with NASA management, employees, and contractors; and the Panel members’ past experiences. There has been a significant amount of notable activity in 2020 in the Commercial Crew Program, ongoing operations of the International Space Station, and progress toward the execution of the Artemis missions, all undertaken in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic with which NASA has dealt commendably. The Panel will provide our brief assessment of those pro- grams, but the ASAP has chosen to place greater emphasis in this year’s report on NASA’s future and its impact on the risks involved in human space exploration. NASA has been at the forefront of human space flight for decades, and much of that time it executed the programs, formulated the missions, defined the requirements, and performed management integration of all the elements composing the system. NASA personnel performed the engineering analyses. They led launch processing and mission operations. But the human space flight environment is rapidly changing. The commercial space industry is growing briskly, bringing innovations and economic benefits. Global interest in space is increasing and, with it, the expectation for more international cooperative efforts. These developments have tremendous upside potential—and are accompanied by equally tremendous challenges for managing the risk of human space exploration. Over the past several years NASA has been adjusting to a changing role and set of responsibilities as it shifts from principally executing its programs and missions to commercially acquiring significant key elements and services. The Agency has gradually and tactically adapted and succeeded in meeting emerging situations and challenges as they developed. However, the Panel firmly believes that it is now critical for NASA to take more strategic scrutiny of the role the Agency should undertake going forward and make some critical decisions, based on deliberate and thorough consideration, that are necessary because of their momentous consequences for the future of human space exploration, and in particular, for the management of the attendant risks. This report will provide the ASAP’s advice to the Agency with respect to the questions that NASA should ask itself to strategically and thoughtfully position itself and the nation for success and safe human exploration of space. In 2021 the Panel seeks to further explore the consequences of the Agency’s evolution, with a focus on the implications for safety and risk management. The ASAP made two formal recommendations this year, both of which addressed the Designation of a Lead Federal Agency for Civil Space Traffic Management, and this report will reemphasize the criticality of this issue. I submit the ASAP Annual Report for 2020 with respect and appreciation. Sincerely, Dr. Patricia Sanders Chair, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Enclosure NASA AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 Dr. Patricia Sanders, Chair January 1, 2021 The Honorable Michael R. Pence President of the Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. President: Pursuant to Section 106(b) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act 2005 (P.L. 109-155), the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) is pleased to submit the ASAP Annual Report for 2020 to the U.S. Congress and to the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Report is based on the Panel’s 2020 fact-finding; quarterly public meetings; direct observations of NASA operations and decision-making; discussions with NASA management, employees, and contractors; and the Panel members’ past experiences. There has been a significant amount of notable activity in 2020 in the Commercial Crew Program, ongoing operations of the International Space Station, and progress toward the execution of the Artemis missions, all undertaken in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic with which NASA has dealt commendably. The Panel will provide our brief assessment of those pro- grams, but the ASAP has chosen to place greater emphasis in this year’s report on NASA’s future and its impact on the risks involved in human space exploration. NASA has been at the forefront of human space flight for decades, and much of that time it executed the programs, formulated the missions, defined the requirements, and performed management integration of all the elements composing the system. NASA personnel performed the engineering analyses. They led launch processing and mission operations. But the human space flight environment is rapidly changing. The commercial space industry is growing briskly, bringing innovations and economic benefits. Global interest in space is increasing and, with it, the expectation for more international cooperative efforts. These developments have tremendous upside potential—and are accompanied by equally tremendous challenges for managing the risk of human space exploration. Over the past several years NASA has been adjusting to a changing role and set of responsibilities as it shifts from principally executing its programs and missions to commercially acquiring significant key elements and services. The Agency has gradually and tactically adapted and succeeded in meeting emerging situations and challenges as they developed. However, the Panel firmly believes that it is now critical for NASA to take more strategic scrutiny of the role the Agency should undertake going forward and make some critical decisions, based on deliberate and thorough consideration, that are necessary because of their momentous consequences for the future of human space exploration, and in particular, for the management of the attendant risks. This report will provide the ASAP’s advice to the Agency with respect to the questions that NASA should ask itself to strategically and thoughtfully position itself and the nation for success and safe human exploration of space. In 2021 the Panel seeks to further explore the consequences of the Agency’s evolution, with a focus on the implications for safety and risk management. The ASAP made two formal recommendations this year, both of which addressed the Designation of a Lead Federal Agency for Civil Space Traffic Management, and this report will reemphasize the criticality of this issue. I submit the ASAP Annual Report for 2020 with respect and appreciation. Sincerely, Dr. Patricia Sanders Chair, Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Enclosure NASA AEROSPACE SAFETY ADVISORY PANEL National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546 Dr. Patricia Sanders, Chair January 1, 2021 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, DC 20510 Dear Madam Speaker: Pursuant to Section 106(b) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act 2005 (P.L. 109-155), the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) is pleased to submit the ASAP Annual Report for 2020 to the U.S. Congress and to the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The Report is based on the Panel’s 2020 fact-finding; quarterly public meetings; direct observations of NASA operations and decision-making; discussions with NASA management, employees, and contractors; and the Panel members’ past experiences. There has been a significant amount of notable activity in 2020 in the Commercial Crew Program, ongoing operations of the International Space Station, and progress toward the execution of the Artemis missions, all undertaken in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic with which NASA has dealt commendably. The Panel will provide our brief assessment of those pro- grams, but the ASAP has chosen to place greater emphasis in this year’s report on NASA’s future and its impact on the risks involved in human space exploration. NASA has been at the forefront of human space flight for decades, and much of that time it executed the programs, formulated the missions, defined the requirements, and performed management integration of all the elements composing the system. NASA personnel performed the engineering analyses. They led launch processing and mission operations. But the human space flight environment is rapidly changing. The commercial space industry is growing briskly, bringing innovations and economic benefits. Global interest in space is increasing and, with it, the expectation for more international cooperative efforts. These developments have tremendous upside potential—and are accompanied by equally tremendous challenges for managing the risk of human space exploration. Over the past several years NASA has been adjusting to a changing role and set of responsibilities as it shifts from principally executing its programs and missions to
Recommended publications
  • Congressional Directory OKLAHOMA
    212 Congressional Directory OKLAHOMA OKLAHOMA (Population 2010, 3,751,351) SENATORS JAMES M. INHOFE, Republican, of Tulsa, OK; born in Des Moines, IA, November 17, 1934; education: graduated Central High School, Tulsa, OK, 1953; B.A., University of Tulsa, OK, 1959; military service: served in the U.S. Army, private first class, 1957–58; professional: businessman; active pilot; president, Quaker Life Insurance Company; Oklahoma House of Representatives, 1967–69; Oklahoma State Senate, 1969–77; Mayor of Tulsa, OK, 1978–84; religion: member, First Presbyterian Church of Tulsa; married: Kay Kirkpatrick; children: Jim, Perry, Molly, and Katy; twelve grandchildren; committees: ranking member, Armed Services; Environment and Public Works; elected to the 100th Congress on November 4, 1986; reelected to each succeeding Congress; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 1994, finishing the unexpired term of Senator David Boren; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://inhofe.senate.gov 205 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................... (202) 224–4721 Chief of Staff.—Ryan Jackson. FAX: 228–0380 Legislative Director.—Clark Peterson. Press Secretary.—Jared Young. Scheduler.—Wendi Price. 1924 South Utica, Suite 530, Tulsa, OK 74104–6511 ................................................ (918) 748–5111 1900 Northwest Expressway, Suite 1210, Oklahoma City, OK 73118 ...................... (405) 608–4381 302 North Independence, Suite 104, Enid, OK 73701 ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Bridenstine (R) Rep
    District Background: Oklahoma - 1 Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R) Relevant committees: None Bike Caucus member: TBA Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers Tusla, Broken Arrow, Bartlesville Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 53 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 244 Annual Gross Revenue: $18,770,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? No 8.9% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.0% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Oklahoma - 2 Rep. Markwayne Mullin (R) Relevant committees: Transportation & Infrastructure Bike Caucus member: TBA Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers Muskogee, McAlester, Claremore Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 29 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 122 Annual Gross Revenue: $590,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? No 8.9% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.0% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Oklahoma - 3 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION to U.S. Export Controls for the Commercial Space Industry
    INTRODUCTION TO U.S. Export Controls for the Commercial Space Industry 2nd Edition – November 2017 Department of Federal Aviation Commerce Administration This publication was prepared by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Office of Space Commerce and the Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation. For additional information, questions, or comments, please visit our websites: www.space.commerce.gov ast.faa.gov IMAGE CREDITS Cover: Spaceflight Industries, Inc. Page 2: Blue Origin Page 12: NASA/Orbital ATK Page 32: Mobilus In Mobili Page 50: Planet Page 58: SSL Page 62: Spire Table of Contents PURPOSE ......................................................................1 SECTION 1: BACKGROUND ...................................................2 1.1 Export Control 101 ........................................................4 1.1.1 Definitions: Exports, Deemed Exports, and Re-exports .................4 1.1.2 The Reasons for Controls ................................................4 1.1.3 Regulations and Responsible Departments .............................5 1.1.4 Multilateral Commitments ..............................................7 1.2 What’s Changed Under Export Control Reform .........................8 1.2.1 Satellite Export Control Reform .........................................8 1.2.2 Major Process Changes under Export Control Reform ..................9 SECTION 2: UNDERSTANDING THE CONTROL LISTS AND HOW THEY WORK ......................................................12 2.1 Overview .................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 114Th Congress 215
    OKLAHOMA 114th Congress 215 OKLAHOMA (Population 2010, 3,751,351) SENATORS JAMES M. INHOFE, Republican, of Tulsa, OK; born in Des Moines, IA, November 17, 1934; education: graduated, Central High School, Tulsa, OK, 1953; B.A., University of Tulsa, OK, 1959; military service: served in the U.S. Army, private first class, 1957–58; professional: businessman; active pilot; president, Quaker Life Insurance Company; Oklahoma House of Representatives, 1967–69; Oklahoma State Senate, 1969–77; Mayor of Tulsa, OK, 1978–84; religion: member, First Presbyterian Church of Tulsa; married: Kay Kirkpatrick; children: Jim, Perry, Molly, and Katy; twelve grandchildren; committees: chair, Environment and Public Works; Armed Services; elected to the 100th Congress on November 4, 1986; reelected to each succeeding Congress; elected to the U.S. Senate on November 8, 1994, finishing the unexpired term of Senator David Boren; reelected to each succeeding Senate term. Office Listings http://inhofe.senate.gov 205 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC 20510 .................................................. (202) 224–4721 Chief of Staff.—Ryan Jackson. FAX: 228–0380 Legislative Director.—Luke Holland. Communications Director.—Donelle Harder. Scheduler.—Wendi Price. 1924 South Utica, Suite 530, Tulsa, OK 74104–6511 .............................................................. (918) 748–5111 1900 Northwest Expressway, Suite 1210, Oklahoma City, OK 73118 .................................... (405) 608–4381 302 North Independence, Suite 104, Enid, OK 73701 .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Journals
    Analysis of Satellite Radio Occultation Architecture and its Stakeholders I. Josue Tapia-Tamayo1 and Paul T. Grogan2 Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA Global Navigation Satellite System Radio Occultation (GNSS-RO) is a technique that relies on the change of a signal transmitted from a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) as it passes through the planet’s atmosphere. This technique is not only suitable to study weather forecasting or climate change, but also offers a low-cost application. This report aims to characterize and parametrize the system architecture of commercial companies pursuing the Commercial Weather Data Pilot (CWDP) contract by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The approach of the paper will start by explaining the Radio Occultation technique and its potential application to Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP). The paper then identifies the main stakeholders of radio occultation and NWP, and their needs. Some key functional requirements are pinpointed, and the challenges that some of these architectures must overcome is discussed. Introduction The increase of severe weather in the last decade has led to the need for improvement of U.S. weather forecasting. Severe weather such as hurricanes and flooding causes great economic damage to cities. According to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the cost of economic damage caused by hurricanes was $161 billion for Katrina in 2005, $71 billion for Sandy in 2012, $125 billion for Harvey in 2017, $90 billion for Maria in 2017, and $50 billion for Irma in 2017. The overall cost of hurricanes in the U.S. reached $515.4 billion in insured property losses from 1986 to 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2018 Satellite & Space Monthly Review
    February 5, 2018 Industry Brief Chris Quilty [email protected] January 2018 +1 (727)-828-7085 Austin Moeller Satellite & Space Monthly Review [email protected] +1 (727)-828-7601 January 11, 2018: Air force to utilize more smallsats for weather DMSP F19 Readying for Launch observation. Citing growing budget constraints, the US Air Force announced that is considering using small satellites in combination with next-gen software rather than procuring traditional multibillion-dollar, cost-plus spacecraft to replace/replenish its Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP). Despite awarding a $94 million contract to Ball Aerospace in November to design the Weather System Follow-on Microwave (WSF-M) satellite, the Air Force plans to begin launching small satellites equipped with infrared imaging and electro-optical instruments to monitor battlefield weather starting in 2021-2022. The Air Force is also considering augmenting their current capabilities with inactive NOAA GOES satellites in the near-term. These considerations parallel recent comments by USSTRATCOM commander Gen. John Hyten, who has repeatedly stated that the Air Force currently spends too much time and money developing large, high- cost satellites, and needs to invest in more small satellites for strategic Source: Lockheed Martin and budgetary reasons. Conclusion: Smallsats ready for a DoD growth spurt? With growing evidence of Russian/Chinese anti- satellite technology demonstrations, the Pentagon is becoming increasingly reluctant to spend billions of dollars on monolithic “Battlestar Galactica” satellite systems that place too many eggs in one basket. While not as robust or technologically-capable as high-end spacecraft built by traditional contractor, such as Lockheed Martin, small satellites are orders-of-magnitude less expensive to build, launch, and maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • Barry E. “Butch” Wilmore (Captain, U.S
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas 77058 January 2021 Barry E. “Butch” Wilmore (Captain, U.S. Navy) NASA Astronaut Summary: Barry E. Wilmore (Captain, U.S. Navy) is a veteran of two spaceflights and has accumulated a total of 178 days in space. He is currently training as Commander of the 1st flight of the Boeing Starliner spacecraft scheduled for launch in the fall of 2021. In September 2014, Wilmore launched aboard a Russian Soyuz rocket as a member of Expedition 41. He served as a Flight Engineer until November when he assumed command of the station upon arrival of the Expedition 42 crew. He returned to Earth in March 2015. During this mission, he logged 167 days in space and performed four spacewalks totaling 25 hours, 36 minutes. In 2009, Wilmore served as a pilot aboard Space Shuttle Atlantis for STS-129, traveling 4.5 million miles in 171 orbits. Wilmore is from Mt. Juliet, Tennessee and earned degrees from Tennessee Technological University and the University of Tennessee. He is a captain in the U.S. Navy. Personal Data: Wilmore is married to the former Miss Deanna Newport of Helenwood, Tennessee and they have two daughters. He was raised in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee where his parents Eugene and Faye Wilmore still reside. His brother Jack and family reside in Franklin, Tennessee. Education: Mount Juliet High School, Mount Juliet, Tennesee. Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Electrical Engineering, Tennessee Technological University. Master of Science in Aviation Systems, University of Tennessee. Experience: Wilmore has accumulated more than 8,000 flight hours and 663 carrier landings, all in tactical jet aircraft, and is a graduate of the United States Naval Test Pilot School (USNTPS).
    [Show full text]
  • H. R. 4489 Union Calendar No
    1 Union Calendar No. 354 103D CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 4489 [Report No. 103±654] A BILL To authorize appropriations to the National Aero- nautics and Space Administration for human space flight, science, aeronautics, and technology, mission support, and Inspector General, and for other purposes. AUGUST 3, 1994 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Commit- tee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed IB Union Calendar No. 354 103D CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 4489 [Report No. 103±654] To authorize appropriations to the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration for human space flight, science, aeronautics, and technology, mission support, and Inspector General, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES MAY 25, 1994 Mr. BROWN of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology AUGUST 3, 1994 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on May 25, 1994] A BILL To authorize appropriations to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for human space flight, science, aeronautics, and technology, mission support, and In- spector General, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 1 2 1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 2 This Act may be cited as the ``National Aeronautics 3 and Space Administration Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 4 1995 and 1996''.
    [Show full text]
  • Espinsights the Global Space Activity Monitor
    ESPInsights The Global Space Activity Monitor Issue 2 May–June 2019 CONTENTS FOCUS ..................................................................................................................... 1 European industrial leadership at stake ............................................................................ 1 SPACE POLICY AND PROGRAMMES .................................................................................... 2 EUROPE ................................................................................................................. 2 9th EU-ESA Space Council .......................................................................................... 2 Europe’s Martian ambitions take shape ......................................................................... 2 ESA’s advancements on Planetary Defence Systems ........................................................... 2 ESA prepares for rescuing Humans on Moon .................................................................... 3 ESA’s private partnerships ......................................................................................... 3 ESA’s international cooperation with Japan .................................................................... 3 New EU Parliament, new EU European Space Policy? ......................................................... 3 France reflects on its competitiveness and defence posture in space ...................................... 3 Germany joins consortium to support a European reusable rocket.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Begins 5Th RS-25 Test Series
    Volume 14 Issue 8 www.nasa.gov/centers/stennis August 2018 NASA begins 5th RS-25 test series NASA conducts a successful hot fire test of RS-25 developmental engine No. 0525 – featuring a new flight controller unit – on the A-1 Test Stand at Sten- nis Space Center on Aug. 14.The test was viewed by new NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine and other guests. (See page 3 article) Page 2 LAGNIAPPE August 2018 It is estimated somewhere between 500 million to It was only fitting, then, that new NASA Administra- 600 million people around the world watched Neil tor Jim Bridenstine wasted little time in making his first Armstrong step onto the surface of the Moon in July visit to the site as agency leader. More fitting, he was 1969. It was the largest television audience at the time, able to view the Aug. 14 test and see firsthand the Sten- although they were not all in the same room. Ark! nis blended test team of NASA, Aerojet Rocketdyne and Syncom Space Services engineers and operators Probably nowhere near that many folk watched the at work. He also got a firsthand look at site facilities, NASA-TV and social media live broadcast of the RS- including the Aerojet Rocketdyne Engine Assembly 25 rocket engine test here Aug. 14 – but it is safe to say Facility, the E Test Complex and the B-2 Test Stand. an awful lot of attention is focused on Stennis Space Center these days. More importantly, the new NASA leader was able to visit with center and resident agency leaders, local Stennis is at the forefront of NASA’s work to build and media members, community representatives and site launch its new Space Launch System (SLS) rocket that employees.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Nasa's Exploration
    A REVIEW OF NASA’S EXPLORATION PROGRAM IN TRANSITION: ISSUES FOR CONGRESS AND INDUSTRY HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 30, 2011 Serial No. 112–8 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65–305PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. RALPH M. HALL, Texas, Chair F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas Wisconsin JERRY F. COSTELLO, Illinois LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland DAVID WU, Oregon FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma BRAD MILLER, North Carolina JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois W. TODD AKIN, Missouri GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona RANDY NEUGEBAUER, Texas DONNA F. EDWARDS, Maryland MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas MARCIA L. FUDGE, Ohio PAUL C. BROUN, Georgia BEN R. LUJA´ N, New Mexico SANDY ADAMS, Florida PAUL D. TONKO, New York BENJAMIN QUAYLE, Arizona JERRY MCNERNEY, California CHARLES J. ‘‘CHUCK’’ FLEISCHMANN, JOHN P. SARBANES, Maryland Tennessee TERRI A. SEWELL, Alabama E. SCOTT RIGELL, Virginia FREDERICA S. WILSON, Florida STEVEN M. PALAZZO, Mississippi HANSEN CLARKE, Michigan MO BROOKS, Alabama ANDY HARRIS, Maryland RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois CHIP CRAVAACK, Minnesota LARRY BUCSHON, Indiana DAN BENISHEK, Michigan VACANCY SUBCOMMITTEE ON SPACE AND AERONAUTICS HON.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Politics;Worlds, Subjects, Rights;
    DATA POLITICS Data has become a social and political issue because of its capacity to reconfigure relationships between states, subjects, and citizens. This book explores how data has acquired such an important capacity and examines how critical interventions in its uses in both theory and practice are possible. Data and politics are now inseparable: data is not only shaping our social relations, preferences, and life chances but our very democracies. Expert inter- national contributors consider political questions about data and the ways it provokes subjects to govern themselves by making rights claims. Concerned with the things (infrastructures of servers, devices, and cables) and language (code, programming, and algorithms) that make up cyberspace, this book demonstrates that without understanding these conditions of possibility it is impossible to intervene in or to shape data politics. Aimed at academics and postgraduate students interested in political aspects of data, this volume will also be of interest to experts in the fields of internet studies, international studies, Big Data, digital social sciences, and humanities. Didier Bigo is Professor of War Studies at King’s College London and Research Professor at Sciences-Po, CERI Paris. Engin Isin is Professor in International Politics at Queen Mary University of London, UK and University of London Institute in Paris (ULIP). Evelyn Ruppert is Professor of Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London. Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology Series Editors: Tugba Basaran, University of Kent, UK, Didier Bigo, King’s College London, UK, Emmanuel-Pierre Guittet, University of Manchester, UK, Jef Huysmans, Queen Mary, University of London, UK Routledge Studies in International Political Sociology aims to provide a forum for out- standing empirical and theoretical research engaging with the interplays between the international, the political and the social.
    [Show full text]