Henslowe's Diary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Henslowe's Diary r N ^ 5?, r ' ' c CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE llljj'ensjpwe's diar f Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924026121305 HENSLOWE'S DIARY HENSLOWE'S DIARY EDITED BY WALTER W. GREG, M.A. PART I. TEXT A. H. BULLEN 47 GREAT RUSSELL STREET, LONDON, W.C, 1904 Am% TO GEORGE FREDERICK WARNER LITT.D. ASSISTANT KEEPER OF MANUSCRIPTS AT THE BRITISH MUSEUM IN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONSTANT AND GENEROUS HELP IN ALL DIFFICULTIES THIS WORK IS GRATEFULLY INSCRIBED. : PREFACE. I WISH in the forefront of my work to discharge the pleasant duty of recording my thanks to those who have with their kind assistance helped me in the fulfilment of my task. In the first place my hearty thanks are due to the Governors of Dulwich College for kindly allowing the manuscript of Henslowe's Diary to be deposited at the British Museum for my use, and for the courtesy and patience with which they have borne with me in a series of unavoidable delays. I should in particular mention Sir Robert Douglas, who most kindly undertook the duty of intermediary. Next I must record my deep indebtedness to the officials of the Manuscript Department at the British Museum. To Dr. Warner, who not only helped me in numerous cases of difficulty, but kindly consented to read the proofs of the section of my Introduction dealing with the knotty question of the forgeries, I have had an opportunity of expressing my gratitude elsewhere ; but I have here to acknowledge a scarcely smaller debt to Mr. F. B. Bickley and Mr. J. A. Herbert for assistance on innumerable occasions. Lastly my best thanks are due to my friend Mr. A. H. Bullen, who originally suggested to me the idea of the present edition, volunteering himself to under- take the publication, and further supplied many helpful suggestions during the course of the work. This is also a fitting place in which to mention several printed works of which I have made free use, and which are occasionally quoted by abbreviated titles. These are J. P. Collier. The History of English Dramatic Poetry to the time of Shake- speare ; and Annals of the Stage to the Restoration. 1831. 3 vols. A reprint appeared in 1879, also in 3 vols. Memoirs of Edzvard Alleyn, Founder of Dulwich College: in- cluding some new particulars respecting Shakespeare, Ben fonson, Massinger, Marston, Dekker, &c. Shakespeare Society. 1841. ix b Printed J. p. Collier. The Diary of Philip Henslowe, from 1591 to 1609. from the original manuscript preserved at Dulwich College. Shakespeare Society. 1845. George F. Warner. Catalogue of the Manuscripts and Muniments of Alleyn's College of God's Gift at Dulwich. 1881. William Young. The History of Didwich College, with a Life of the Founder, Edzvard Alleyn. 1889. 2 vols. Francis B. Bickley. Catalogue of the Manuscripts and Muniments of Alleyn's College of God's Gift at Dulwich. Second Series. 1903. Walter W. Greg. Park Lodge, Wimbledon. August igo4. N.B.—The modern foliation inserted in pencil in the original manuscript has been followed in this reprint, and it is by this that all references are made. Clarendon numerals refer to the folios, ordinary numerals following to the lines. Thus 44" 15 means: Folio 44 verso, line 15. CONTENTS. PACE Introduction xiii § I. History of the MS. § ll. Description of the MS. § ill. Con- tents of the MS. § IV. Henslovve's Handwriting. § v. Other Hands appearing in the Diary. § vi. The Forgeries. § viii. Plan of the Present Edition. § vili. Fragments belonging to the Diary. Text ._ i Notes 215 Glossary . 238 XI ' INTRODUCTION. § I. History of the MS. Of all documents illustrating the external history of the Elizabethan drama the most important that has escaped the ravages of time is undoubtedly the volume of miscellaneous accounts and memoranda commonly known as ' Henslowe's Diary.' The volume was first used by a certain John Henslowe for the entry of accounts of the felling and disposal of timber and other matters relating to Ashdown Forest. His accounts belong to the years 1576 to 1581. After this the book appears to have been laid by for some time, for we next find it in use by Philip Henslowe in London early in i ^2. By him it was used for the entry of a variety of accounts and memoranda relating both to private affairs and to business transactions, dramatic and other, during the following eighteen years. The la,test entry dates from 1609. In the meantime Edward Alleyn, who had married Henslowe's step-daughter, retired from the stage about 1 604, and some ten years later he founded the College of God's Gift at Dulwich. Into his hands Henslowe's papers, the Diary among them, passed, presumably on the latter's death in 1616, and they thus found their way into the library of the College. Here they remained unmolested for more than a century and a half It was not till 1780 that their existence became known to Edmond Malone, and when he then approached the authorities of Dulwich, "tbe. < Diary proved to have been mislaid. Shortly before 1790, however, the MS. was discovered and entrusted to Malone, who was then engaged upon his ' Variorum edition of Shakespeare.^ He caused a transcript of such portions as he deemed of importance to be prepared, and of this he printed an abstract in the appendix to the 'History of the Stage' prefixed to his edition (vol. I. pt. ii. p. 288), with the addition of a few other documents from the same source. This transcript was collated with the original by Malone himself, and contains a variety of notes and corrections in his hand. He possibly intended to make more extended use of it in the revised edition of his Shakespeare, for which he spent many years collecting material, but which he left to James Bosvvell the younger to bring out after his death. Malone, it would appear, kept the original in his possession till his death in 18 12, when it was returned to Dulwich by his literary executor.^ Boswell, however, when t Warner, p. viii. ^ Collier, Alleyn Memoirs, p. 3. jciii he published the revised 'Variorum' of 1821 (vol. III. p. 295), appears merely to have reprinted the extracts as they stood in Malone's previous edition, though the transcript was in his possession at the time and appeared in the sale of his books sale, whence it passed in 1825 (No. 3 141). The transcript reappeared in the Heber into the possession of Sir Thomas Phillipps, and after his death again came into the market in 1895. On this last occasion it was purchased, on the recommendation of Dr. Warner, by the Governors of Dulwich College, and now forms part of that library.^ The next person, so far as is known, to make use of the MS. was J. P. Collier,^ who had recourse to it when engaged on his History of Dramatic Poetry (1831), and reprinted the whole, so far as it relates to dramatic affairs, for the Shakespeare Society in 1845. Since Collier's edition appeared many scholars have inspected the volume either for the sake of the evidence it supplies concerning the conditions of the Elizabethan drama, or else attracted by the controversy which long raged round certain entries which were alleged to have been forged in it. The volume was described, and a careful though not quite complete list of the forgeries given, by Dr. G. F. Warner in his invaluable Catalogue of the Manuscripts and Muniments of Alleyiis College of God's Gift at Dulwich (1881). Finally, at the suggestion of Mr. A. H. BuUen, I applied, in the autumn of 1902, for permission from the Governors of the College to have the MS. temporarily deposited at the British Museum, in order to prepare a new edition, a request to which they most generously and courteously acceded, and the transference of the precious document was effected through the kind mediation of Professor, now Sir Robert, Douglas. ' MSS., Second Series, No. 60. See Bickley, p. 99. The transcript contains the following, 7-11" 14", 15", 21", (from portions of the original MS. : (except 1. 46, a forgery), 12", 13, 14, 25 1. 10), 25"-27", 34' (from 1. 7), 35, 36 (from.l. 4), 36"-38, 38" (11. 1-3 only, the transcriber having broken off abruptly when he discovered the entries to be unimportant), 43"-54", 62"-71 (for the forgery on 64", see below, p. xlii), 85"-87", 91-95" (except forgeries on 94 and 95), 96 (from 1. 7), 104 (11. 1-14), 105-109" (except forgery on 109), 110 (II. 1-5), 115-120 (except forgeries on 116), 120" (except 11. 15-21), 121. ^ See Warner, p. x. Unfortunately the Private-Sittings Books of the Governors apparently do not record the loan of the MS. either to Malone about 1790 or to Collier about 1830. This is curious since we find mention of a loan to the Archbishop of Canterbury on June 9, 1819. The next is to Collier, the entry running thus (Bickley, p. 95) : "12 Oct. 1840. 'J. P. Collier, Esq., 24 Brompton Square having requested permission to transcribe Henslow's diary preparatory to its being reprinted by the Shakespear Society, ordered that the MS. be entrusted to Collier upon his engaging not to let it go out of his own hands and to return it within two months.
Recommended publications
  • 3D Computer Modelling the Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606)
    3D Computer Modelling The Rose Playhouse Phase I (1587- 1591) and Phase II (1591-1606) *** Research Document Compiled by Dr Roger Clegg Computer Model created by Dr Eric Tatham, Mixed Reality Ltd. 1 BLANK PAGE 2 Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………….………………….………………6-7 Foreword…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9-10 1. Introduction……………………..………...……………………………………………………….............………....11-15 2. The plot of land 2.1 The plot………………………………………………..………………………….………….……….……..…17-19 2.2 Sewer and boundary ditches……………………………………………….……………….………….19-23 3. The Rose playhouse, Phase I (1587-1591) 3.1 Bridges and main entrance……………………..……………………………………,.……………….25-26 3.2 Exterior decoration 3.2.1 The sign of the Rose…………………………………………………………………………27-28 3.2.2 Timber frame…………………………………………………..………………………………28-31 3.3. Walls…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….32-33 3.3.1 Outer walls………………………………………………………….…………………………..34-36 3.3.2 Windows……………………………………………………………..…………...……………..37-38 3.3.3 Inner walls………………………………………………………………………………………39-40 3.4 Timber superstructure…………………………………………….……….…………….…….………..40-42 3.4.1 The Galleries………………………………………………..…………………….……………42-47 3.4.2 Jutties……………………………………………………………...….…………………………..48-50 3.5 The yard………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….50-51 3.5.1 Relative heights………………………………………………...……………...……………..51-57 3.5.2. Main entrance to the playhouse……………………………………………………….58-61 3.6. ‘Ingressus’, or entrance into the lower gallery…………………………..……….……………62-65 3.7 Stairways……………………………………………………………………………………………………....66-71
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of the Dramatic Works of John Lyly to Later Elizabethan Comedies
    Durham E-Theses The relationship of the dramatic works of John Lyly to later Elizabethan comedies Gilbert, Christopher G. How to cite: Gilbert, Christopher G. (1965) The relationship of the dramatic works of John Lyly to later Elizabethan comedies, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9816/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 THE RELATIONSHIP OP THE DRAMATIC WORKS OP JOHN LYLY TO LATER ELIZABETHAN COMEDIES A Thesis Submitted in candidature for the degree of Master of Arts of the University of Durham by Christopher G. Gilbert 1965 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. DECLARATION I declare this work is the result of my independent investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Printing, and Editing of the Returne from Pernassus
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1-2009 The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus Christopher A. Adams College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Recommended Citation Adams, Christopher A., "The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus" (2009). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 237. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/237 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in English from The College of William and Mary by Christopher A. Adams Accepted for____________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors ) _________________________ ___________________________ Paula Blank , Director Monica Potkay , Committee Chair English Department English Department _________________________ ___________________________ Erin Minear George Greenia English Department Modern Language Department Williamsburg, VA December, 2008 1 The History, Printing, and Editing of The Returne from Pernassus 2 Dominus illuminatio mea -ceiling panels of Duke Humfrey’s Library, Oxford 3 Acknowledgments I am deeply indebted to my former adviser, Dr. R. Carter Hailey, for starting me on this pilgrimage with the Parnassus plays. He not only introduced me to the world of Parnassus , but also to the wider world of bibliography. Through his help and guidance I have discovered a fascinating field of research.
    [Show full text]
  • From Sidney to Heywood: the Social Status of Commercial Theatre in Early Modern London
    From Sidney to Heywood: the social status of commercial theatre in early modern London Romola Nuttall (King’s College London, UK) The Literary London Journal, Volume 14 Number 1 (Spring 2017) Abstract Thomas Heywood’s Apology for Actors (written c. 1608, published 1612) is one of the only stand-alone, printed deFences of the proFessional theatre to emerge from the early modern period. Even more significantly, it is ‘the only contemporary complete text we have – by an early modern actor about early modern actors’ (Griffith 191). This is rather surprising considering how famous playwrights and drama of that period have become, but it is revealing of attitudes towards the profession and the stage at the turn of the sixteenth century. Religious concerns Formed a central part of the heated public debate which contested the social value oF proFessional drama during the early modern era. Claims against the literary status of work produced for the commercial stage were also frequently levelled against the theatre from within the establishment, a prominent example being Sir Philip Sidney’s Defence of Poesie (written c. 1579, published 1595). Considering Heywood’s Apology in relation to Sidney’s Defence, and thinking particularly about the ways these treatises appropriate the classical idea oF mimesis and the consequent social value of literature, gives fresh insight into the changing status of drama in Shakespeare’s lifetime and how attitudes towards commercial theatre developed between the 1570s and 1610s. The following article explores these ideas within the framework of the London in which Heywood and his acting company lived and worked.
    [Show full text]
  • A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement
    A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics California’s Home for the Classics Table of Contents Dating Shakespeare’s Plays 3 Life in Shakespeare’s England 4 Elizabethan Theatre 8 Working in Elizabethan England 14 This Sceptered Isle 16 One Big Happy Family Tree 20 Sir John Falstaff and Tavern Culture 21 Battle of the Henries 24 Playing Nine Men’s Morris 30 FUNDING FOR A NOISE WITHIN’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS IS PROVIDED IN paRT BY: The Ahmanson Foundation, Alliance for the Advancement of Arts Education, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich, Employees Community Fund of Boeing California, The Capital Group Companies, Citigroup Foundation, Disney Worldwide Outreach, Doukas Family Foundation, Ellingsen Family Foundation, The Herb Alpert Foundation, The Green Foundation, Kiwanis Club of Glendale, Lockheed Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County Arts Commission, B.C. McCabe Foundation, Metropolitan Associates, National Endowment for the Arts, The Kenneth T. and Eileen L. Norris Foundation, The Steinmetz Foundation, Dwight Stuart Youth Foundation, Waterman Foundation, Zeigler Family Foundation. 2 A Noise Within Study Guide Shakespeare Supplement Dating Shakespeare’s Plays Establishing an exact date for the Plays of Shakespeare. She theorized that authorship of Shakespeare’s plays is a very Shakespeare (a “stupid, ignorant, third- difficult task. It is impossible to pin down rate play actor”) could not have written the exact order, because there are no the plays attributed to him. The Victorians records giving details of the first production. were suspicious that a middle-class actor Many of the plays were performed years could ever be England’s greatest poet as before they were first published.
    [Show full text]
  • Corpus Linguistics and 17Th-Century Prostitution.Indb
    McEnery, Anthony, and Helen Baker. "Life as a 17th-Century Prostitute." Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 33–89. Corpus and Discourse. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 29 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474295062.0006>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 29 September 2021, 05:00 UTC. Copyright © Anthony McEnery and Helen Baker 2017. You may share this work for non- commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 Life as a 17th-Century Prostitute Free as light and air I walk, And uncontroll ’ d my passions guide; I eat and drink and sing and talk, And something else I do beside; Hither then, my followers come, And, on the couch, the seat of bliss, I ’ ll strait conduct the hero home, And shew you what this something is. 1 2.1 Introduction – historical research on early modern prostitution If we asked our readers to imagine a seventeenth-century prostitute, it is likely that some might picture a beautifully dressed and youthful courtesan, perhaps attending the playhouse with her wealthy lover but keeping a mindful watch for potential suitors. Others might visualize a wretched streetwalker, her appearance visibly marred by the tolls of venereal disease, alcoholism and physical abuse, attempting to interest a passer-by in a brief outdoor transaction. Both of these images do have their place in early modern England but they represent polar extremes of a profession that spanned a great range of social class and economic status and which women turned to for diff erent reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Smith Music's Mobility
    University of Birmingham The many performance spaces for music at Jacobean indoor playhouses Smith, Simon DOI: 10.1017/9781316488768.003 License: Other (please specify with Rights Statement) Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Smith, S 2017, The many performance spaces for music at Jacobean indoor playhouses. in D Lindley & B Barclay (eds), Shakespeare, Music and Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316488768.003 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This material has been published in revised form in Shakespeare, Music and Performance edited by Bill Barclay, David Lindley https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316488768.003. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re- distribution or re-use. © Cambridge University Press. General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
    [Show full text]
  • Romeo at the Rose in 1598
    Issues in Review 149 66 Beeston is one of six men at the Red Bull named in an order for repair of the high- ways by the theatre, dated 3 October 1622; see Bentley, The Jacobean and Caroline Stage, 1.169 n.2. As he had managed Queen Anne’s Men there, and returned there with them after the 1617 riot, it appears that he owned, and continued to own, the theatre. 67 For ‘bifold appeal’ see discussion in Rutter, Work and Play, 110. 68 Exceptions include the Red Bull Revels’ Two Merry Milkmaids, at court in 1619/20, and Gramercy Wit in 1621; see Bentley, The Jacobean and Caroline Stage, 1.173. Romeo at the Rose in 1598 In two plays of the Lord Admiral’s Men — Englishmen for My Money and The Two Angry Women of Abingdon — echoes of Romeo and Juliet appear.1 The first performances of Englishmen took place at the Rose in 1598. Two Angry Women is likely to have played at the same venue in the same year. What may these echoes tell us about the ethos and practices of the Lord Admiral’s Men, about the dramatists who wrote for them, and about the company’s place in the literary and dramatic milieu of the time? I want to argue that the presence of these echoes reveals a degree of inte- gration into urban literary fashion. And I will also suggest that some of the company’s playwrights exhibit the kind of knowing playfulness that was soon to characterize the repertory of the children’s companies and which was already shaping the satires and epigrams to reach print publication at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • London and Its Main Drainage, 1847-1865: a Study of One Aspect of the Public Health Movement in Victorian England
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England Lester J. Palmquist University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Palmquist, Lester J., "London and its main drainage, 1847-1865: A study of one aspect of the public health movement in Victorian England" (1971). Student Work. 395. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/395 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LONDON .ML' ITS MAIN DRAINAGE, 1847-1865: A STUDY OF ONE ASPECT OP TEE PUBLIC HEALTH MOVEMENT IN VICTORIAN ENGLAND A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Lester J. Palmquist June 1971 UMI Number: EP73033 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI EP73033 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Sharers' Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical
    Syme, Holger Schott. "A Sharers’ Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical Documents in Shakespeare’s England. Ed. Tiffany Stern. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 2020. 33–51. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350051379.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 08:28 UTC. Copyright © Tiffany Stern and contributors 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 A Sharers’ Repertory Holger Schott Syme Without Philip Henslowe, we would know next to nothing about the kinds of repertories early modern London’s resident theatre companies offered to their audiences. As things stand, thanks to the existence of the manuscript commonly known as Henslowe’s Diary , scholars have been able to contemplate the long lists of receipts and expenses that record the titles of well over 200 plays, most of them now lost. The Diary gives us some sense of the richness and diversity of this repertory, of the rapid turnover of plays, and of the kinds of investments theatre companies made to mount new shows. It also names a plethora of actors and other professionals associated with the troupes at the Rose. But, because the records are a fi nancier’s and theatre owner’s, not those of a sharer in an acting company, they do not document how a group of actors decided which plays to stage, how they chose to alternate successful shows, or what they, as actors, were looking for in new commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Redating Pericles: a Re-Examination of Shakespeare’S
    REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY A THESIS IN Theatre Presented to the Faculty of the University of Missouri-Kansas City in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS by Michelle Elaine Stelting University of Missouri Kansas City December 2015 © 2015 MICHELLE ELAINE STELTING ALL RIGHTS RESERVED REDATING PERICLES: A RE-EXAMINATION OF SHAKESPEARE’S PERICLES AS AN ELIZABETHAN PLAY Michelle Elaine Stelting, Candidate for the Master of Arts Degree University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2015 ABSTRACT Pericles's apparent inferiority to Shakespeare’s mature works raises many questions for scholars. Was Shakespeare collaborating with an inferior playwright or playwrights? Did he allow so many corrupt printed versions of his works after 1604 out of indifference? Re-dating Pericles from the Jacobean to the Elizabethan era answers these questions and reveals previously unexamined connections between topical references in Pericles and events and personalities in the court of Elizabeth I: John Dee, Philip Sidney, Edward de Vere, and many others. The tournament impresas, alchemical symbolism of the story, and its lunar and astronomical imagery suggest Pericles was written long before 1608. Finally, Shakespeare’s focus on father-daughter relationships, and the importance of Marina, the daughter, as the heroine of the story, point to Pericles as written for a young girl. This thesis uses topical references, Shakespeare’s anachronisms, Shakespeare’s sources, stylometry and textual analysis, as well as Henslowe’s diary, the Stationers' Register, and other contemporary documentary evidence to determine whether there may have been versions of Pericles circulating before the accepted date of 1608.
    [Show full text]
  • Back to the Future: a Review of Comparative Studies in Shakespeare and the Commedia Dell'arte
    Issues in Review 227 Back to the Future: A Review of Comparative Studies in Shakespeare and the Commedia dell'Arte A wide-ranging, if admittedly not exhaustive, interpretive survey of compara- tive studies of Shakespeare and the commedia dell'arte, which this essay aims to provide, must include several important studies from the early twentieth century because their archival and bibliographic rigour makes them still use- ful points of departure for serious comparative study. Whereas the linear posi- tivistic source study (eg, ‘x influenced y’) that flourished in this early phase of comparative literature no longer compels us living in the age of inter- textuality, a transnational approach to Renaissance theatre should welcome archivally-documented accounts of actors crossing boundaries: the material encounters of international exchange. New work on the Shakespeare-arte question can weave together the archival and the intertextual, which has been richly redefined in recent years for the field of Renaissance drama by Louise George Clubb and other scholars.1 In giving some prolonged attention to early-twentieth-century scholars in the first half of this essay, I will pause over some of the foundational documents published in their studies as interpretive cruxes still meriting discussion. In my discussion of late-twentieth-century scholarship, I will acknowledge ties to the earlier work. Drawing from several late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century archival studies, such as Albert Feuillerat’s 1908 printed edition of documents from the
    [Show full text]