DOCSLIB.ORG

FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Lead, Inspire, Achieve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN Lead, Inspire, Achieve The school facility is much more than a passive container of the educational process; it is, rather, an integral component of the conditions of learning. Lawrence O. Picus, Richard T. and Mary Catherine Cooper Chair in Public School Administration at the USC Rossier School of Education “ + + EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN i This page is intentionally left blank. Board of Trustees EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Andy Sheehy, President 5455 Eureka Road, Granite Bay, CA 95746 Renee Nash, Clerk Jeffrey Conklin, Trustee 916.791.4939 | eurekausd.org Ryan Jones, Trustee Melissa F. MacDonald, Ph.D., Trustee Superintendent Tom Janis This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Superintendent’s Message ................................................................. 1 District-Wide Facilities Master Plan 1 | Introduction .................................................................................. 5 Why Does Eureka Union School District Need a Facilities Master Plan? A. Why Now? B. How? C. Taking Eureka Union SD to the Next Level 2 | History of Eureka Union School District ..................................... 13 A. How it All Began B. History of Partnerships 3 | Key Steps in the Creation of the Facilities Master Plan ............. 21 A. Comprehensive Demographic Studies & Enrollement Projections B. Facility Needs Assessment C. Number of Students Does Not Tell the Whole Story D. Current Makeup of the District E. Vision & Pathways 4 | Goals & Funding Priorities .......................................................... 29 A. Current Programs Supporting Vision & Pathways Plus Facility Needs To Maintain & Grow Critical Academic Programs B. Overview of District’s Needs & Options + EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN 5 | Priority Areas for Repair, Upgrade, Modernization & Construction ..................................................................................... 35 A. Infrastructure Upgrades B. School Site Safety C. Technology Infrastructure Upgrades D. Sustainability & Energy Efficiency E. The Future of the Classroom F. Serving Students Beyond the Classroom G. Sports Fields, Performing Arts Centers & The Community 6 | Overview of Eureka Union SD’s Schools & Specific Needs ........ 63 The District At A Glance Cavitt Junior High School Eureka Union Elementary School Excelsior School Greenhills Elementary School Maidu Elementary School Oakhills Elementary School Olive Ranch Elementary School Olympus Junior High School Ridgeview Elementary School District Office Maintenance & Transportation Facility 7 | Paying for the Facilities Master Plan Projects ............................ 89 A. The State of Education Funding in California B. How Will the Projects in This Facilities Master Plan be Paid For? + EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN As the District’s “new” schools – Oakhills Elementary SUPERINTENDENT’S MESSAGE (serving grades TK-3), Ridgeview Elementary (serving grades 4-6), Olympus Jr. High (serving grades 7-8), Maidu Elementary (serving grades 4-6) and Excelsior Elementary DISTRICT-WIDE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN (serving grades 4-6) – are beginning to hit middle age, and When I first joined the staff of Eureka Union School District in 2013 as the Director of our older schools – Cavitt Jr. High (serving grades 7-8) and Human Resources, I knew I had joined an amazing team of educators, but I also recognized Greenhills Elementary (serving grades TK-3) – are looking immediately how much the local community has shaped and supported the District since its forward to collecting Social Security – the District needs inception, and continues to do so. to make a significant financial investment in our facilities. Failing to repair a school is no different than failing to fix Since I was appointed Superintendent in 2015, I have had the privilege and honor of working a leaky roof on a home. The leak will result in significant with our amazing staff, students and parents, but also importantly to work with the entire damage to the school and the longer we wait to repair it, the more expensive the repair community in leading the District into its next and logical phase. The academic excellence becomes. Eureka Union SD is no different than other government agencies like counties that has been the hallmark of the District continues to drive families to our community and, and cities that must ensure that their facilities – libraries, jails, courthouses, administrative despite Eureka’s well-below State average in per pupil funding, Eureka Union SD continues to buildings and fire departments – are up to code, large enough to serve the population and, in be a leader in student achievement in Northern California. the case of first responders, outfitted with the best equipment possible. Our culture of “out of the box” thinking has allowed Eureka Union SD to offer programs and The riches reportedly being poured into California’s public schools in the last few years are services that larger neighboring districts—with higher per-pupil funding—do not provide. We being distributed in ways that keep Eureka’s share far less than the statewide average. While are a district of “why not” rather than a district of “why?” Eureka Union SD is a magnet for we are indeed grateful for the “new money” the State is sending our way, we are still below students throughout the area who choose to leave their own home district to attend Eureka the amounts we received prior to the Great Recession. When inflation is taken into account, Union SD. Far from harming Eureka Union SD, these inter-district transfer students bring State in addition to many rising costs that are not within our control—including energy, employee money with them and, even though our per-pupil funding is lower than most other districts pensions, insurance and an endless array of new, unfunded State mandates—we continue to in the State, that money is still sufficient to allow us to provide a greater scope of programs feel the pinch of being underfunded. and services than we would be able to offer if we had significantly fewer students. The costs of Special Education are rising much more rapidly than the reimbursements we Critical to understanding the needs and goals you will find in this FMP is a deep receive from State and Federal sources. While there was much excitement in the news about understanding and of the history of the District. While the rich history of Eureka Union SD increased funding for Special Education from the State this year, our District’s share is a mere goes as far back as the end of the American Civil War, as recently as early 1990s Eureka $12 per student. New State-mandated curriculum adoptions, with no corresponding money to Union SD was composed of only three schools: Eureka, Greenhills and Cavitt.The District’s purchase the textbooks or other materials needed for curriculum implementation—including 4th school, Oakhills – which still seems in many ways like the baby of the family – was professional development—are just some of the other pressures being placed on the District to dedicated in 1990. Ridgeview was dedicated the following year, followed rapidly by find a way to continue to offer academic excellence in a truly global, 21st Century setting that Olympus in 1996, Maidu in 1997 and Excelsior, the true the baby in the family, in 1999. is student-centric and relevant to the new realities of our global economy. Improved programs Understanding the rich history of this District and how it has set priorities over the years is for student mental health and the need to upgrade school site security in an age of senseless helpful in understanding the direction we are trying to go. Thus, you will find a section in school shootings have added to the financial needs of the District. this document that provides an overview of the District’s history, including key inflection points such as the one we now find ourselves in. The longer we wait to repair our schools, the more expensive it will become. The longer we wait to implement new and more relevant, challenging curriculum, the more our students are harmed. + EUREKA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 FACILITIES MASTER PLAN 1 Eureka Union SD has been evaluating, prioritizing and executing repairs and upgrades based What visitors also fail to see is the grand possibilities for a whole new way of learning and on safety, the availability of grant money or matching dollars and based on the age and teaching, the type of programs our students of today and tomorrow must have to be truly needs of each school site for over five years.With Board of Trustee’s creation of a Facilities competitive when they reach high school, college and career. Subcommittee and its engagement of Project CM to provide a much needed overhaul of the way the District’s limited maintenance staff and funding, we have improved the way the It is also critical to point out that the schools do not belong solely to the Eureka Union School District handles requests for repairs has streamlined the process. This new process allows us District, its students, staff and parents. These are community-owned facilities, paid for by tax to be more responsive to concerns raised by staff at different school sites. It has also been dollars. Local schools have always played a role in serving the entire community, from local Boy instrumental in creating this FMP. Our team has walked every inch of every campus and Scout troop meetings after school to the use of gyms and other sports fields by local sports evaluated needs in all areas of each site. Many expensive components of public schools like leagues on the weekends and evenings. Our plan is to make repairs and improvements that will technology infrastructure, school site safety and indoor plumbing are things that did not even not only serve the students of today and tomorrow, but also critically to improve the value and exist in 1886 when the District’s first school, a one-room school house was constructed. utility for the public at large, including refurbished sports fields that can be used year round.
Recommended publications
  • Trinity County 3-Year Integrated Plan 2017- 2020

    Trinity County 3-Year Integrated Plan 2017- 2020

    Trinity County 3 -year Integrated Plan 2017- 2020 Noel O’Neill, LMFT Director of Trinity County Behavioral Health- Marlinda Butler, MSW MHSA Coordinator Trinity County Behavioral Health. Trinity County’s plan to implement and evaluate beneficial and effective Mental Health Services Act programming throughout the county. Trinity County 3-year Integrated Plan 2017-2020 Introduction Trinity County is a rural frontier county located in the far northwest corner of the State. It is known for its rugged beauty and mountainous terrain. The county is roughly the size of Rhode Island but is occupied by only approximately 13,000 individuals. According to U.S. Census Bureau Statistics the population of the county has decreased slightly as of July 1, 2016. There are now 12,782 residents of the county. Communities in the county are widely spaced and the two most populated townships are Weaverville with 3,500 residents and Hayfork with approximately 2,300 residents. Travel through the county is done on two 2- lane highways: Hwy. 299 that runs East and West; and, Hwy. 3 that runs North and South. Travel in the winter is sometimes hazardous due to snow storms; and, often during the summer and early fall, the county can be plagued with wildfires that inundate the air with smoke. Historically, Trinity County was a destination for prospectors and gold miners; and, later home to a booming logging industry. The economy of the county has never recovered after two mill closings and a significant reduction of timber jobs. Currently, tourism is a key source of revenue for the county and more recently the marijuana industry.
  • !US PRICE Vf01/Pco3 Plus Postage

    !US PRICE Vf01/Pco3 Plus Postage

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 211 243 MC C13 C47 AUTHOR Rankin, Dorothy, Ed. TITLE Country School Legacy: Humanities on the Frontier. INSTITUTION Mountain Plains Library Association, Silt, Colo. Country School Legaty Project. SPONS AGENCY National Endowment for the Huaanities (NFAN), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 81 NOTE 70p.: For related documents, see RC C1.3 048-058 and RC 013 070-084. Photographs will not reproduce clearly. !US PRICE vF01/pCO3 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Acculturation: Community Centers; Community Schools; Cultural Backgrounds Cultural Education; Curriculum; *Educational History; Elementary Secondary IducOion; Ethnic Groups; *One Teacher Schools; Oral History: *Rural Education; *Rural Schools; School Buildings: *School Community Relationship; *Small schools; State History; Teacher Batkground; Teacher Education; Teacher Qualifications; Teacher Role; United States History IDENTIFIERS Colorado; *Country School Legacy Project; Historic Sites; Kansas; Nebraska; Nevada; North Dakota; South Dakota; Utah: Wyoming j ABSTRICT As late as 1938 there were 200,000 cue -zoos schools scattered throughout the United States. By 1978 there were little more than 1,000 in operation. Primary-source research cz rural education has now been conducted by 23 researchers in Colorado, Kansas, Nebragka, Nevada, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming, sponsored by the Mountain Plains Library Association and funded by the National Endowment for the Husanities. Using information from oral histories, treasured msentoes, speeches, newspapers and other published
  • July 2021 Communicator

    July 2021 Communicator

    Grenada School District Education, Training, Dreams Communicator Information for the Grenada School District Community July 19, 2021 Community 2020/2021 Teacher of the Year ed to the challenging start of skill!” Celebration the 2020-21 school year. With Conley has taught for six her classroom decorated and years with four of those at ready for students, Conley was GES 4-5. She attended the Superintendent's asked to make a last-minute University of Southern Mis- Message switch to virtual instruction. sissippi, where she earned a Tharpe was impressed by degree in tourism manage- Dr. David Daigneault her willingness to change ment, before completing her gears at the last minute. “Mrs. elementary education degree Conley put in countless hours at William Carey University. Back in January, in this space, of research, even taking an I wrote about how we planned to available online class to pre- Conley is married to Steven rebound from the pandemic by pare herself for this daunting Conley, with whom she has coming together with the com- task of virtual instruction,” three children. Triston and munity to work for and with each Tharpe said. “As she does Sims are in third and first other. I wrote about our support in all aspects of her job, she grade respectively at GES, and from Grenada businesses, which went above and beyond by Eliza is two years old. comes in many forms, and the networking with other virtual “I am really thankful for programs we’re building to train the teachers across the state to the opportunity to work in next generation of workers for local ensure she could provide our this district, especially at the industry.
  • The Free Learner: a Survey of Experiments in Education. PUB DATE Mar 70 NOTE 34P

    The Free Learner: a Survey of Experiments in Education. PUB DATE Mar 70 NOTE 34P

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 044 048 EM 008 542 AUTHOR Woulf, Constance TITLE The Free Learner: A Survey of Experiments in Education. PUB DATE Mar 70 NOTE 34p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.25 HC-$1.80 DESCRIPTORS Educational Innovation, Educational Philosophy, *Experimental Schools, Nonauthoritarian Classes, *Permissive Environment, Relevance (Education) ABSTRACT As an alternative to the traditional public school, some educators recommend an environment rich in .academic, artistic, and athletic stimuli, from which the child can take what he wants when he wants it. This survey represents the observations of visitors to classrooms in the San Francisco Bay Area which are run on the free learner principle. Twenty private schools, two experimental programs in public schools, and two public schools which are working within the framework et compulsory education are described. As a preface to the descriptions of the actual schools, a fictitious "Hill School" is described which embodies much of the philosophy and practice of the free school ideal.A table of data is also presented which gives information about the student and teacher population and financial status of each of the schools described. This document previously announced as ED 041 480. (JY) U.S. DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY THE FREE LEARNER a survey of experiments in education conducted by CONSTANCE WOULF MARCH 4970 The inspiration for this survey was a book and its author: George Leonard's Education and Ecsta and Leonard's course given at the University of California in Summer 1969.
  • Report on Voluntary Support, June 30, 2007

    Report on Voluntary Support, June 30, 2007

    THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS' COMMUNICATION ITEM FOR INFORMATION June 30, 2007 REPORT ON VOLUNTARY SUPPORT SUMMARY BY SOURCE The following figures include outright gifts and pledge payments for all purposes, from all fundraising efforts within the University. Not included are pledges at original face value, bequests not yet distributed, or deferred payment devices such as insurance policies. YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE GIFTS FOR GIFTS FOR SOURCES OF GIFTS 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 JUNE 2006 JUNE 2007 Individuals: Living Individuals $162,909,976 $173,776,286 $14,579,180 $18,960,870 Realized Bequests 22,176,183 39,762,346 2,537,705 3,247,407 Total Individuals 185,086,159 213,538,632 17,116,885 22,208,277 Corporations 20,833,230 21,524,083 2,490,132 2,836,742 Foundations 33,636,733 48,707,892 1,364,143 3,613,633 Associations/Others 17,887,397 16,590,516 2,309,141 2,348,512 TOTAL $257,443,519 $300,361,123 $23,280,301 $31,007,164 SUMMARY BY TYPE OF GIFT YEAR-TO-DATE YEAR-TO-DATE GIFTS FOR GIFTS FOR TYPES OF GIFTS 2005 - 2006 2006 - 2007 JUNE 2006 JUNE 2007 Cash and Equivalents $241,464,956 $282,373,665 $22,122,781 $27,903,027 Gifts-In-Kind 3,263,768 5,073,886 311,536 611,397 Life Income Agreements 10,697,606 12,761,268 845,984 2,340,436 Outside Managed Irrevocable Trusts 2,017,189 152,304 0 152,304 TOTAL $257,443,519 $300,361,123 $23,280,301 $31,007,164 Respectfully submitted, Jerry A.
  • Student Membership Awards for 1957 Selected by the A.O.U

    Student Membership Awards for 1957 Selected by the A.O.U

    286 A.O.U. Committees [Vol.[ Auk74 COMMITTEEON PROGRAil. Thomas R. Howell, Chairman. Harold Mayfield, James T. Tanner, Harrison B. Tordoff. ComvaTTEEON PUBLICATIONS.The Editor of 'The Auk' (Robert W. Storer), Chairman. The President, the Secretary, the Treasurer, the Editor of the Ten- Year Index to 'The Auk' (L. R. Wolfe). COmaITTEEON I•SE•CH. Donald S. Farner, Chairman. Andrew J. Berger, John T. Emlen, Jr., S. CharlesKendeigh, Ralph S. Palmer,Harrison B. Tordoff, Mil- ton B. Trautman, M.D. F. Udvardy. COMMITTEEON STUDENTAWARDS. William H. Behle, Chairman. Joseph C. Howell, Robert T. Orr, Raymond A. Paynter, Jr., Harrison B. Tordoff. LOCAL COl•t•IITTEE ON ARRANGEM•ENTSFOR THE SEVENTY-FIFTH STATED MEETING. M. Albert Linton and Philip A. Livingston, Co-chairmen. STUDENT MEMBERSHIP AWARDS FOR 1957 SELECTED BY THE A.O.U. COMMITTEE ON STUDENT MEMBERSHIP AWARDS Gene Doyle Amman, Colorado A. and M. College, Ft. Collins, Colorado Robert Jack Badaraeeo, San Francisco State College, San Francisco, California Gerald Joseph Bakus, Montana State University, Missoula Harold Arthur Bantly, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Jackie David Batson, University of Tennessee,Knoxville JosephVern Beekerr, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio George Bennett, Stillwater Cove Ranch School,Jenner, California Delwyn Green Berrett, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Arthur Charles Borror, Ohio State University, Columbus Van A. Bradley, Niles Township High School,Lincolnwood, Illinois Dilford Campbell Carter, Texas A. and M. College, College Station Helen Virginia Carter, University of Wisconsin, Madison Roger Barnum Clapp, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Dean G. Dillery, Ohio State University, Columbus Robert J. Drake, University of Arizona, Tucson Jay Newton Eisenhart, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York David Earle Foster, Bowdoin College,Brunswick, Maine Richard Cullen Funk, Colorado A.
  • Historic School Buildings in the Evolution of the Fifth Supervision School District, Nevada

    Historic School Buildings in the Evolution of the Fifth Supervision School District, Nevada

    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior ^^ National Park Service [ .;^ j National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form WAIlOwm, This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instruc^n"sWi©l®feftr?es for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Historic School Buildings in the Evolution of the Fifth Supervision School District, Nevada B. Associated Historic Contexts Education in Southern Nevada and the Evolution of the Fifth Supervision School District, 1861-1942 Schoolhouse Architecture in Southern Nevada's Fifth Supervision School District. 1870 to 1942 C. Geographical Data__________________________________________________ The boundaries of the multiple property listing are the jurisdictional boundaries of Nevada's Fifth Supervision School District which existed from 1907 to 1956. This area includes the counties of Clark, Lincoln, Nye, and Esmeralda in southern Nevada. LJ See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation.
  • Relocation Guide to Ann Arbor, MI

    Relocation Guide to Ann Arbor, MI

    EuRA: Ann Arbor City Guide Updated: 2/2/2017 Helping you feel at home abroad. Relocation Guide to Ann Arbor, MI www.iorworld.com IOR makes every effort to ensure the information contained in this guide is as current as possible. If you notice errors, or information which is no longer accurate, please contact us immediately so we may correct the issue. i IOR Global Services • All Rights Reserved Worldwide TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME AND OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 1 EMERGENCY .................................................................................................................................... 4 HOUSING ......................................................................................................................................... 6 U.S. EDUCATION SYSTEM .............................................................................................................. 13 SCHOOLS IN YOUR AREA ............................................................................................................... 21 BANKING ....................................................................................................................................... 22 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION/DRIVING ............................................................................................ 24 LOCAL REGISTRATION ................................................................................................................... 26 LIVING AND SHOPPING ................................................................................................................
  • Fall 2018 Benchmarks

    Fall 2018 Benchmarks

    New Leader, Solid Foundation Keep the Ball Rolling for MHSAA Schools Cover Story: MHSAA Foundation Propels Future The MHSAA has a long tradition of visionary leaders who built a solid foundation for school sports in the state, including recently retired Jack Roberts, who stepped down after 32 years 4 last spring. Next up, Mark Uyl, who brings vast experience and insight to keep the ball rolling. MHSAA Full-Time Staff The Vault – 14 Follow the Leaders Tony Bihn, Director of Information Systems The MHSAA has been in good Jordan Cobb, Assistant Director, Information Systems hands with visionary leaders Andy Frushour, Director of Brand Management since 1931 – and even before Nate Hampton, Assistant Director that. Dan Hutcheson, Assistant Director Cody Inglis, Assistant Director John R. Johnson, Director of Broadcast Properties Rob Kaminski, Website & Publications Coordinator State of Play – 26 Geoff Kimmerly, Media & Content Coordinator A total of 19 sports bested the Camala Kinder, Administrative Assistant state’s overall national partici- Cole Malatinsky, Administrative Assistant pation ranking of eighth by plac- Peggy Montpas, Accounting Manager ing seventh or higher on their Andrea Osters, Assistant Director respective lists. Girls volleyball Thomas M. Rashid, Associate Director helped lead the way. Brent Rice, Assistant Director Laura Roberts, Receptionist/Officials Registrar 2018- Adam Ryder, Assistant Director, Information Systems Regulations Review – 34 2019 Mark Uyl, Executive Director Transfer Tune-Up Jamie VanDerMoere, Administrative Assistant A new transfer rule takes ef- Faye Verellen, Administrative Assistant fect beginning with the 2019- Tricia Wieferich, Administrative Assistant 20 school year. Here is a Kathy Vruggink Westdorp, Assistant Director primer on the regulation mov- Paige Winne, Administrative Assistant ing forward.
  • Public School Buildings in Michigan

    Public School Buildings in Michigan

    An Honor and an Ornament: Public School Buildings in Michigan State Historic Preservation Offi ce Michigan Historical Center Michigan Department of History, Arts and Libraries September 2003 1 An Honor and an Ornament: Public School Buildings in Michigan Credits Client: State Historic Preservation Offi ce, Michigan Historical Center, Department of History, Arts and Libraries, Lansing, Michigan www.michiganhistory.org Consultant: ICON architecture, inc., Boston, Massachusetts Jonathan Lane, AIA, AICP, Principal-in Charge Rita Walsh, Senior Preservation Planner Beatrice Bernier, Associate and Interpretive Planner Richard Perkins, Graphic Designer Ahmed Kaddoum, Graphics Assistance Roy Strickland New American School Design Project, Taubman College of Art and Architecture, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Printing by Inland Press, Detroit Special appreciation to Douglas LaFerle of French Associates, Kathryn Eckert, William Kane of the Kane Group, Inc., Robert Janson, and Suzanne Daniel of the Michigan One-Room School- “A new [school] house is to be built the ensuing house Association. Many thanks to the numerous school district summer…that will be an honor and an orna- administrators and other individuals who shared information about ment to the town.” their buildings. John H. Palmer, Barry County Superintendent, in the 1870 The activity that is the subject of this project has been fi nanced Annual Report of the Michigan Superintendent of Public completely with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Instruction U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Michigan Depart- ment of History, Arts and Libraries. However, the contents and opinions herein do not necessarily refl ect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Department of History, Arts and Libraries, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products herein constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Michigan Department of History, Arts and Libraries.
  • Zooming in on 2021 AWARDS BANQUET • MARCH 19, 2021

    Zooming in on 2021 AWARDS BANQUET • MARCH 19, 2021

    MICHIGAN INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION zooming in on 2021 AWARDS BANQUET • MARCH 19, 2021 Motown Digital • Virtual Conference Host MIAAA Awards Banquet Board of Directors 2021 Master of Ceremonies – Michael Roy, CMAA President JEFF KLINE, CMAA Athletic Administrative Assistant of the Year presented to Mt. Morris ELIZABETH WILSON First Vice President Recording Secretary MIAAA Service Awards – Aaron Crouse, CMAA and Michael Quinn, CMAA ZAC STEVENSON, CMAA ERIC ALBRIGHT, CMAA Traverse City Central Midland Regional Athletic Directors of the Year – Michael Roy, CMAA Second Vice President Past President Dennis Kiley President’s Plaque presented to NIKKI NORRIS, CAA MICHAEL ROY, CMAA JEFF KLINE, CMAA East Lansing Vicksburg President’s Ring presented to Executive Director KAREN LEINAAR, CAA ZAC STEVENSON, CMAA Bear Lake MIAAA Big Four Awards – Cody Inglis, CAA Special Recognition Award presented to BILL MICK George Lovich State Award of Merit presented to MARTY GOTTESMAN Jack Johnson Distinguished Service Award presented to Regional JAMES OKLER, CMAA Representatives MIAAA Athletic Director of the Year Award presented to MIKE BAKKER, CMAA Region 1 Region 8 SEAN JACQUES, CAA, Calumet WESLEY WEBSTER, Birch Run Region 2 Region 9 FRED BRYANT, CAA, Cadillac SHAYNE MISHLER, Montrose Hill McCloy Region 3 Region 10 JASON KEMLER, RAA, Brethren SEAN ZABOROWSKI, CMAA, St. Clair Shores Awards Committee Region 4 Region 11 AARON CROUSE, CMAA, Co-Chair, Notre Dame Prep TIM RITSEMA, CAA, Jenison DON WATCHOWSKI, CMAA, Royal Oak MICHAEL QUINN, CMAA, Co-Chair, Lake Odessa Lakewood Region 5 Region 12 KEVIN GUZZO, CMAA, St. Joseph SCOTT WIEMER, CAA, Dearborn Annapolis Region 6 Region 13 BONNIE BINIORIS, RAA, Lansing Christian JEAN LaCLAIR, CMAA, Bronson ROBERT WRIGHT, CAA, Sand Creek MIKE EVOY, CAA, Detroit CHSL JEFF DASSANCE, CAA, Eaton Rapids PETE RYAN, CMAA, Retired Region 7 Region 14 BRIAN GORDON, CAA, Novi FRED SMITH, CMAA, Retired DARIN FERGUSON, Haslett JOLINDA LUCAS, CAA, Grand Rapids Univ.
  • 1985 Who's New at Kalamazoo

    1985 Who's New at Kalamazoo

    WELCOME CLASS OF 1989 & TRANSFER STUDENTS To the Members of the Class of 1989: It is with great pleasure that I welcome each of you to Kalamazoo College. I look for­ ward to sharing the excitement of the next four years with you. During my first years at "K" College, I have developed an appreciation for the diverse experiences you will have as you progress through our unique curriculum. In addition to greater knowledge, skills, and independence, you will also gain ,many lasting friendships that will continue and deepen during your years as alumni. I hope you will make the most of the many opportunities that await you. I look forward to meeting each of you personally, and offer my best wishes for a pro­ ductive and rewarding college carrer. David W. Breneman President 2 Dr. Wen Chao Chen Executive Vice-President Director of the Stryker Center Dr. Warren Board Vice-President for Academic Affairs Provost Dr. Haydn Ambrose Vice-President for Institutional Development 3 Welcome to "K" college! We hope to get to know most of you over the next year and hopefully work with some of you in Student Commission. As entering freshpersons, we realize that the challenges of the academics here will keep you busy. Although this will play a large role in your college experience, involvement in student organizations and activities is just as important. Finding time away from the books and applying yourself to campus activities should be of the highest priority, whether it be in athletics, cultural and ethnic organizations, the college newspaper, the film society, music, the radio station, student government, theater, the yearbook, or an individual interest.