DOCSLIB.ORG

Cathexis CONSULTING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cathexis CONSULTING OUTCOME EVALUATION OF THE UNDP COUNTRY PROGAM OUTCOME 2 – VULNERABLE GROUPS HAVE IMPROVED ACCESS TO ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AND ADEQUATE SOCIAL PROTECTION: FINAL EVALUATION REPORT NOVEMBER 11, 2016 McGuire Associates 7210 Lancaster Avenue Mississauga ON L4T 2L3 Telephone: 647-201-9680 Fax: 905-673-1779 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. 3 List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................ 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 7 I. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 12 1.1 Purpose and Scope of this Evaluation ....................................................... 12 1.2 Country Program Context and Background .............................................. 13 1.3 Evaluation Methodology ........................................................................... 19 II. Evaluation Findings. ............................................................................................. 22 2.1 Relevance .................................................................................................. 22 2.2 Effectiveness ............................................................................................. 24 2.3 Efficiency .................................................................................................. 36 2.4 Impact ....................................................................................................... 37 2.5 Sustainability of Results ........................................................................... 39 III. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................... 40 3.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................... 40 3.2 Recommendations ..................................................................................... 45 Annex A: Evaluation Terms of Reference ....................................................................... 48 Annex B: Evaluation Criteria and Questions ................................................................... 70 Annex C: Project Descriptions ......................................................................................... 73 Micro-Enterprise Development Program (MEDEP) ............................................ 74 Strengthening National Planning and Monitoring Capacity (SNPMC) ................ 79 Support to Knowledge and Lifelong Learning Skills (SKILLS) .......................... 84 Livelihood Recovery for Peace (LRP) .................................................................. 86 Community Infrastructure and Livelihood Recovery for Peace (CILRP) ............ 86 Rapid Enterprise and Livelihoods Recovery Project (RELRP) ............................ 89 Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wetlands in Nepal (CSUWN) ................... 91 Outcome Evaluation of the UNDP Country Program Outcome 2 – Evaluation Report i McGuire Associates November 11, 2016 Renewable Energy for Rural Livelihoods (RERL) ............................................... 94 Annex D: Team Background and Detailed Responsibilities ......................................... 102 Annex E: Resource Documents ..................................................................................... 104 Annex F: List of Key Informants ................................................................................... 108 Annex G: Case Studies .................................................................................................. 109 Potato Rustic Store Common Facility Centre ..................................................... 110 Dhaka Weaving Enterprise ................................................................................. 113 Micro Hydro Station ........................................................................................... 116 Alital Multipurpose Cooperative Ltd .................................................................. 120 Chandrama Bedbansh Sajha Subidha Kendra (CBSSK) Cane Crafts ................ 122 Youth Mobilisation for Peace and Development ................................................ 125 Kharbang Chiuri Herbal Soap Enterprise ........................................................... 127 Ritu Saughat Griha .............................................................................................. 129 Sunhara Agriculture cooperative ltd, Common Facility Centre ......................... 131 Dhaka Weaving common facility center (CFC), ................................................ 133 Kuluhabagiya, Common Facility Center ............................................................ 136 Girindi Khola Micro Hydro Cooperative Santha Limited .................................. 138 Anakhola Micro Hydro Plant .............................................................................. 141 Annex H: Indicator analysis Table ................................................................................ 144 Annex I: Contribution to Improved Economic Opportunity & GESI by Project .......... 154 Annex J: Rating Standard .............................................................................................. 157 Outcome Evaluation of the UNDP Country Program Outcome 2 – Evaluation Report ii McGuire Associates November 11, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This evaluation could not have been completed without the cooperation of all of the participants who made themselves available on very short notice. Particular appreciation goes to the UNDP Evaluation Management Group that supported this evaluation and provided feedback on the inception and evaluation report. Chair: Ms. Sophie Kemkhadze Evaluation Manager and Secretariat to EMG: Ms. Heema Devi Khadka Members (from CO): Mr. Vijaya Singh Mr. Dharma Swarnakar Ms. Nabina Shrestha Ms. Anupa Lamichhane Mr. Vijay Kesari Mr. Surendra Sob Ms. Sujeeta Bajracharya Ms. Binda Magar Ms. Giun Kim Members from projects: Mr. Ramji Neupane (MEDEP) Mr. Giridhari Sharma Paudel (SNPMC) Mr. Satish Gautam (RERL) Mr. Niranjan Tamrakar (CILRP) Mr. Bhawani Shankar Subedi (SKILLS). The field visits could not have occurred without the support of Laxmi Limbu, Satish Gautam and Niranjan Tamrakar. A special thanks to Giun Kim who assisted us throughout the evaluation, gathering documents and putting us in touch with various stakeholders. Outcome Evaluation of the UNDP Country Program Outcome 2 – Evaluation Report 3 McGuire Associates November 11, 2016 LIST OF ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank AEPC Alternative Energy Promotion Centre BDSPO Business Development Service Providing Organization CBS Central Bureau of Statistics CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women CILRP Community Infrastructure and Livelihood Recovery for Peace CILRP Community Infrastructure and Livelihood Recovery Program CPAP Country Program Action Plan CPD Country Program Document CSIDB Cottage and Small Industries Development Board CSUWN Conservation and Sustainable Use of Wetlands in Nepal CTEVT Council for Technical Education & Vocational Training DADO District Agricultural Development Office DCCI District Chamber of Commerce and Industry DCSIO District Cottage and Small Industries Office DDC District Development Committees DEECCS District Energy, Environment and Climate Change Sections DEDSP District Enterprise Development Strategic Plan DFAT Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade DFID United Kingdom Department for International Development DFO District Forest Office DLSO District Livestock Service Office DMEGA District Micro-entrepreneurs Group Association ESAP Energy Sector Assistance Programme FAMOS imc FAMOS 7.1 GESI Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Nepal GIDC Government Information Dissemination Centre (GIDC) GoN Government of Nepal GRB Gender Responsive Budgeting GRBC Gender Responsive Budget Committee HDI Human Development Index Outcome Evaluation of the UNDP Country Program Outcome 2 – Evaluation Report 4 McGuire Associates November 11, 2016 IEDI Industrial Enterprise Development Institute IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency KOICA Korea International Cooperation Agency LRP Livelihood Recovery for Peace M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MDG Millennium Development Goals MED Micro Enterprise Development MEDEP Micro Enterprise Development Program MEDPA Micro Enterprise Development for Poverty Alleviation MoE Ministry of Education MoF Ministry of Finance MoFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoI Ministry of Industry MoPE Ministry of Population and Environment NEA National Electricity Agency NGO Non-governmental Organization NMEFEN National Micro Entrepreneurs’ Federation Nepal NORAD Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation NPC National Planning Commission NRM Natural Resource Management NRREP National Rural & Renewable Energy Programme RE Renewable Energy RELRP Rapid Enterprise and Livelihoods Recovery Project RERL Renewable Energy for Rural Livelihoods SDG Sustainable Development Goals SKILLS Support to Knowledge and Lifelong Learning SNPMC Strengthening National Planning and Monitoring Capacity TVET Technical Vocational Education and Training UNCT United Nations Country Team UNDAF United Nations Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Grant Number: 0093 NEP February 2010 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program [ADBGrant 0093NEP] Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report of Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Submitted to: Ministry of Local Development Government of Nepal Proponent: Office of District Development Committee/ District Technical Office Chautara, Sindhupalchowk Prepared by: Frisa-Iteco Joint Venture (in association with SKAT) District Implementation Support Team (DIST) Chautara, Sindhupalchowk, Nepal Telephone No.: 011-620338 Fax No.: 011-620087 February, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………………….....i Name and Address of Proponent………………………………………………..……...ii Executive Summary in Nepali………………………………………………………….iii Executive summary in English………………………………………………….…… viii Salient Features of the sub-Project………………………………………..………….xiii 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Background………………………………………………………………...........1
    [Show full text]
  • National Shelter Cluster Meeting
    National Shelter Cluster Meeting Kathmandu 04 November 11am Shelter Cluster Nepal ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter 1 Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Government directives on ‘Procedures for the Flow of Grant/Assistance for Reconstruction of Houses Completely Destroyed by the Earthquake, Government of Nepal 2015.’ 3. Information Management update 4. Technical Coordination update 5. Recovery and Reconstruction Working Group update 6. Private Sector update 7. Update from the Shelter Recovery Monitoring Assessment 8. AOB Shelter Cluster Nepal ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter 2 2. Govt. Update Procedures for the Flow of Grant/Assistance for Reconstruction of Houses Completely Destroyed by the Earthquake 2015 Shelter Cluster Nepal ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter 3 from the directive Beneficiary Selection •Houses completely destroyed and can’t be used even after maintenance and retrofitting (Grant for Retrofitting/maintenance: not specified in the directive). •Families having only one house that was completely damaged due to the earthquake. If they own other house/s in another location and are not destroyed, are ineligible for grant (families have to sign a declaration form). •Families should own citizenship/land ownership certificate or other supporting paper such as w/s, electricity card. Shelter Cluster Nepal ShelterCluster.org Coordinating Humanitarian Shelter 4 Design / Construction . GoN approved housing design catalogue Vol-I is at final stage for printing, will be made public before Tihar holiday. The catalogue will be published in 3 volumes: Rural housing design :Vol-I and Vol-II. Urban housing design: Vol-III. All designs are flexible and can be changed but not the technology, but should comply the requirements of NBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report
    EVALUATION REPORT Nepal Earthquake Emergency Response Project SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 HURDEC PVT LTD, NEPAL Thasikhel, Lalitpur, Nepal Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 4 A. Evaluation Context and Methodology ........................................................................ 4 B. Project Achievements ................................................................................................ 4 C. Good and Highly Appreciated Practices .................................................................... 6 D. Key Issues and Challenges ....................................................................................... 6 E. Lessons from the Project Experience ........................................................................ 7 F. Major Recommendations ........................................................................................... 7 1. Background and Context ................................................................................................... 9 2. Evaluation Objectives and Methodology .......................................................................... 10 3. Evaluation Findings ......................................................................................................... 11 3.1 Overall Findings ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Completion Report Project Number: 40554 Grant Numbers: 0093/0094 August 2014 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB’s Public Communications Policy 2011. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – Nepalese rupee(s) (NRe/NRs) At Appraisal At Program and Project Completion (11 October 2007) (30 June 2013) NRs1.00 = $0.0158 $0.0105 $1.00 = NRs63.20 NRs95.24 ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank DDC district development committee DFID Department for International Development of the United Kingdom DOLIDAR Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads MFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MOF Ministry of Finance OFID OPEC Fund for International Development PCU project coordination unit SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation VDC village development committee NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Nepal ends on 15 July. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2009 ends on 15 July 2009. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. Vice-President W. Zhang, Operations 1 Director General H. Kim, South Asia Department (SARD) Country Director K. Yokoyama, SARD Team leader G. Gewali, Senior Project Officer, SARD Team members R. Bhattarai, Operations Assistant, SARD J. Sharma, Gender Consultant, SARD D. Singh, Senior Environment Officer, SARD B. Sitoula, Project Analyst, SARD L. Subedi, Senior Social Development Officer (Safeguards), SARD In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
    Chapter 3 Project Evaluation and Recommendations 3-1 Project Effect It is appropriate to implement the Project under Japan's Grant Aid Assistance, because the Project will have the following effects: (1) Direct Effects 1) Improvement of Educational Environment By replacing deteriorated classrooms, which are danger in structure, with rainwater leakage, and/or insufficient natural lighting and ventilation, with new ones of better quality, the Project will contribute to improving the education environment, which will be effective for improving internal efficiency. Furthermore, provision of toilets and water-supply facilities will greatly encourage the attendance of female teachers and students. Present(※) After Project Completion Usable classrooms in Target Districts 19,177 classrooms 21,707 classrooms Number of Students accommodated in the 709,410 students 835,820 students usable classrooms ※ Including the classrooms to be constructed under BPEP-II by July 2004 2) Improvement of Teacher Training Environment By constructing exclusive facilities for Resource Centres, the Project will contribute to activating teacher training and information-sharing, which will lead to improved quality of education. (2) Indirect Effects 1) Enhancement of Community Participation to Education Community participation in overall primary school management activities will be enhanced through participation in this construction project and by receiving guidance on various educational matters from the government. 91 3-2 Recommendations For the effective implementation of the project, it is recommended that HMG of Nepal take the following actions: 1) Coordination with other donors As and when necessary for the effective implementation of the Project, the DOE should ensure effective coordination with the CIP donors in terms of the CIP components including the allocation of target districts.
    [Show full text]
  • District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform
    Monthly District Report Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform, Nepal Housing Recovery and Reconstruction Platform District Report Sindhupalchok 15 March – 11 April 2019 Summary of events during this period Name of activity/event Event date Participants Contact Person Reference Document summary Male Female Ward Level Coordination Meeting, 14 Mar, 2019 5 2 Pradip Sharma Meeting Minutes of the Helambu RM-2 event Hollow Concrete Block Manual 18th and 19th 114 5 Pradip Sharma, Activity Report of the Orientation March, 2019 Pranjal Bhandari event District General Coordination 26 Mar, 2019 14 6 Pradip Sharma, Meeting minutes to the Meeting Pranjal Bhandari event Ward Level Coordination 8th April, 2019 0 8 Pranjal Bhandari, Meeting, Barhabise Municipality- Pradip Sharma 6 Palika Level Coordination 8th April, 2019 15 0 Pranjal Bhandari, Meeting Pradip Sharma Palika level Coordination meeting 10-April, 2019 11 2 Upcoming Events & Meetings Name of activity/event Date, Time, and Organizer Contact Person Location General Coordination Meeting 23-Apr-2019, 11:00 HRRP Pranjal Bhandari, Pradip Sharma AM, Chautara Tranche Status Chautara Helambu Indrawati Jugal Lisankhu Melamchi Panch Sunkoshi Tripura Rural Balefi Barhabise Bhotekoshi sangachok RM RM RM Pakhar NP pokhari RM Sundari /Municipality RM Mun RM gadhi RM Thangpal RM Mun RM Total HHs Surveyed Total HHs 8323 5665 5374 13374 7181 5739 4591 6043 7903 4225 13989 5421 Eligible Total HHs 8049 5524 4932 13056 6784 5563 4462 5964 7727 4131 13723 5176 Enrolled First Tranche 5964 7727 4131 13723 5176
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake: One Year On
    ne year has passed since a devastating magnitude-7.8 earthquake struck Nepal on 25 April 2015, with the epicenter about 80 kilometers northwest of the capital, Kathmandu. This was the worst disaster to hit Nepal in decades. Only 17 days later a second earthquake of magnitude 7.4 hit near Mount Everest, taking more lives and destroying more homes. According to government estimates, the earthquakes EXECUTIVE Oleft over 750,000 houses and buildings destroyed or damaged and caused over 8,790 deaths. It is estimated that the earthquakes affected the lives of approximately eight million people, constituting almost one-third of the population of Nepal. With the situation dire, the Nepal government declared a state of emergency, and appealed for international aid. Along with other agencies, Habitat SUMMARY for Humanity answered the call to assist the people of Nepal. During the emergency phase, Habitat distributed 5,142 temporary shelter kits to families whose homes were destroyed or left uninhabitable. Habitat volunteers removed 650 tons of earthquake rubble, and distributed 20,000 water backpacks to families in earthquake-affected areas. As the emergency phase ended, Habitat’s programs shifted into reconstruction. Engineers completed safety assessments on 16,244 earthquake- damaged homes. Initial construction began on permanent homes in the community in Kavre district. As months passed, winter brought the threat of cold weather exposure, and Habitat distributed 2,424 winterization kits to families at risk to the elements. In addition, 32 trainers and 632 people in affected communities received instruction on the Participatory Approach for Safe Shelter Awareness. Overall in the first year since the earthquakes, Habitat for Humanity provided assistance to more than 43,700 families through various disaster response programs.
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12Th 2015
    WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12th 2015 Please find following the analysis of the 4W data – May 12th Introduction (Round 2) This is the second round of the 4W analysis. As this is the second round and still early in the emergency response, many agencies are still planning their interventions and caseloads, hence much of the data is understandably incomplete. In the coming week/s we will receive far more comprehensive partner data and will be able to show realistic gaps. In addition, we are receiving better affected population data and there are many ongoing assessments, the results of which will help us to understand both the response data and the affected population data and enable us to deliver a far more profound analysis of the WASH response. Please assist us as we have a lot of information gaps in the data provided so far and hence the maps are not yet providing a true picture of the response. We would like to quickly move to VDC mapping including planned/reached beneficiaries. Since the first round of reporting, agencies have provided substantially more VDC‐level data – as of today, of 740 WASH activities identified, 546 of these (74%) are matched to an identified VDC ‐ this is a big improvement from last week (which had VDC data for 192 of 445 activities, or 43%) The Highlights ・ 47 Organisations – number of organisations that reported in Round 1 and/or Round 2 of the WASH 4W ・ 206 VDCs – where WASH interventions taking place/planned (in 15 districts) 4W – WASH May 12th 2015 Water0B Spread of water activities ‐ targeted Temporary
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL: Sindhupalchok District - Technical Assistance: Short Training Coverage by VDC (As of 25 April 2017) HRRP
    NEPAL: Sindhupalchok District - Technical Assistance: Short Training Coverage by VDC (as of 25 April 2017) HRRP No. of Trained Masons through DUDBC Curriculum by POs Legend Rasuwa JICA/TCN 1459 NRCS 866 SABAL/UCEP-N 474 District Boundary CARE-N/CSRC 452 VDC/Municipality Boundary SCI/TUKI CHINA 428 ARSOW-ASF 366 No. of masons trained PLAN 239 OXFAM/MANK/Janahit 217 549 CA 192 201 - 400 UNDP 184 101 - 200 MC/CDECF 179 CARITAS-N 160 Upto 100 PWJ/ISAP 121 No masons trained BC/ARSOW 83 HELP/TUKI 66 Gumba INCLUSIVE 51 Helumbu Baruwa Motang 86 LWF/GMSP 30 Total trained masons: 5,567 Remaining planned figure: 235 0 82 89 Gloche 90 Note: Tatopani This map highlights the number of masons trained 28 through short training curriculum in Sindhupalchok district. The figure of masons trained was sourced form Thanpalkot HRRP 4W-R30. Further, the labels in the map (Example Nuwakot 154 :Baramchi - 55) means that 55 masons have been trained in the respective VDC/Municipality. Ichok Kiwool Listikot 0 27 ThampalChhap Sindhupalchok 40 155 Gunsakot 97 Banskharka 55 Pangtang Map Doc Name: Short_T_Sindhupalchok_R30 Palchok Fulpingkatti GLIDE Number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Mahankal BhoteNamlang 30 0 0 Creation Date: 25 Apr 2017 0 30 Dubachour Lagarche Baramchi 114 59 55 Map Data Source: HRRP 4W-R25 (as of 25 Apr 2017) Thakani Dhuyang Marming Selang Hagam 30 Geo Data Source: DoS, MoFALD; 123 40 Web Resource: www.hrrpnepal.org SipalKavre 0 78 65 SyauleBazar Jalbire Melamchi N.P. Gati Haibung 97 0 Nawalpur 59 81 549 Batase 186 91 Maneswor Karthali Bahrabise Bhotechaur 90 84 Fulpingkot 88 ¯ Ghorthali 60 32 Badegau Kunchok 31 (1 : 250,000) 307 375 Chautara N.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Line Construction Department 220Kv and Above
    3 A YEAR IN REVIEW- FISCAL YEAR-2014/2015 Board of Directors 4 Nepal Electricity Authority NEPAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY Organizationi al S Structurel l NEA Board Audit Committee Managing Director Internal Audit Department L-11 Acc. MD'S Secretariat, NEA Subsidiary L- 11 T Companies Loss Reduction Division L-10 Electrical Distribution & Consumer Services Generation Transmision Planning, Monitoring & IT Engineering Directorate, Project Mgmt. Administration Finance Directorate, Directorate, Directorate, Directorate, DMD L-12 T Directorate, Directorate, Directorate, DMD L-12 T DMD L-12 T DMD L-12 T DMD L-12 T DMD L-12 A DMD L-12 A Grid Operation Planning & Technical Large Power Plant Operation Biratnagar Regional Office, Department, Power Trade Department, Project Development Services Department, L-11 T & Maintenance Department*, Department, L-11 T L-11 T Project Preparation Accounts Department, L-11 T L-11 T L- 11 T Human Resource Department, L-11 Acc Janakpur Regional Office, Grid Development Department, Community & RE L-11 T Medium Power Plant Information Technology L-11 T L-11 Adm Department Department, Environment & Social Operation & Maintenance L-11 T Department, Study Department, L-11 T Department*, L-11 T Hetauda Regional Office, L-11 T L- 11 T General Service Corporate Finance System Operation Finance Division, L-11 T Department, Department, Technical Support Department, Department, L-10 Acc. System Planning Department, L-11 Adm L-11 Acc L-11 T L-11 T L-11 T Soil Rock and Concrete Kathmandu Regional Laboratory, Office, L-11 T Major
    [Show full text]
  • N E P a L Kathmandu ! CEN\TRAL
    86°0'0"E o LANGTANG Helicopter LZ Highway Int. Boundary Accessibility Source Primary road District bound. Within walking 5 distance from road L !f UNHAS Sec. road VDC boundary 1 Within walking !f USMC A 0 distance from 4X4 road R a s u w a f 2 ! NPL Military No road access P e Data Sources: WFP, LC, UNGIWG, Survey Department of Nepal, Date Created: 04 June 2015 Prepared by: LogCluster GeoNames, © OpenStreetMap contributors, E Assessments, UNHAS, USMC, NPL Military, ICIMOD n Contact: [email protected] Map Reference: The boundaries and names and the designations used on this map do u Website: www.logcluster.org NPL_OP_sindupalchokAccessMap_A3L not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. N J - FAR-WESTERN C H I N A MID-WESTERN p Helambu WESTERN a Pop: 2748 N E P A L Kathmandu ! CEN\TRAL M I N D I A EASTERN Gumba s Pop: s Baruwa Bhotang 3677 e Pop: 1962 Pop: 2767 0 2.5 5 10 c Melamchi Ghyang Tembathau c Tembathau Max Heli: Mi-8 f Kilometers f Sunchaur Max Heli: ? f! ± ! A ! f Tarkeghang ! Golche f N Tarkeygyang f f ! " 0 k Ghangkharka ! ' ! 0 f ° Max Heli: 8 ! 2 o Mi-8 Simbakharka h f Tatopani Golche ! G318 c f Pop: 7259 N u w a k o t Bothang Pop: 3870 ! Kamsking l Gumba Beilgaur f 3 f f! Gumba f 0 a !! ! H Singarche Baouara Bhotang Max Heli: ? !f Kodari p ! !f Max Heli:T ?hap!alkot NanLkihdairkLaidrLi arke Pop: 2824 f u Max Heli: ? !f ! f Bolde Kutumsang Rewar ! C H I N A h ! Ichok Kiul Max Heli: Mi-8 f Sanjagaun f Pop: 3161 Chibihang ! f Lissti Rasithau Pop: 5773 f ! f d Max Heli: ? ! f ! Ghunsakot f ! ! Pop: 2038
    [Show full text]