DOCSLIB.ORG

Topic: 2.1 Bolshevik Consolidation Year Group: 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Subject: History Topic: 2.1 Bolshevik Consolidation Year Group: 12 Key word Definition 1. How did the Bolsheviks consolidate their control? 2. Ending involvement in WWI All Russian A group of deputies elected from local soviets 1 Creating a 1. The Bolsheviks replaced the Cabinet with who would meet and organise the running of 1 Congress of Soviets one-party the Sovknarkom Why 1. The Bolsheviks promised peace and much the country withdraw of their support came from tired soldiers state 2. The Bolsheviks abandoned the title Central Executive Congress deputies elected the Central ? 2. Lenin was worried about civil war – he ‘Minister’ and replaced it with ‘People’s Committee Committee. Commissar’ could recall troops and get ready to fight the Bolshevik opponents. Constitution A set of laws a country is run by Electing 1. The Provisional Government had 2 3. Russia’s military was exhausted and could Replaced the Red Guard – the Bolshevik army the organised elections for the Constituent not continue to fight. Red Army Constitue Assembly for November 4. Lenin was convinced Germany was about Sovnarkom The government of the new revolutionary nt 2. Lenin had to honour this arrangement to have its own Communist Revolution regime Assembly 3. The SRs won with 53% of the vote. 2 Why was 1. Ceasefire was agreed in December but 4. Consolidating the one party state 3 How did 1. Lenin demanded that the Assembly were it negotiating a treaty took several months Lenin subservient to the Sovnarkom and the difficult? 2. Germany was already occupying large 1 How did 1. Nationalisation of industry and land control soviets. areas of Russia and demanded major they ownership increased the Bolsheviks’ the 2. When the Assembly met in January and concessions increase power Constitue rejected this condition, Lenin brought the 3. Trotsky did not support Lenin’s mantra of their 2. In March 1918, Trotsky was made head nt Red Guard to block the elected ‘peace at any cost’ power of the new Red Army to control Assembly? representatives entry further? growing unrest 3. This effectively closed the Assembly 3 What was 1. The treaty caused major splits in the the Bolsheviks: Bukharin led the 2 What was 1. In July 1918 the Bolsheviks set out a 4 How did 1. He said that the election didn’t reflect the impact of ‘revolutionary war group’ that argued the Soviet new Soviet Constitution. It appeared Lenin will of the people signing? against peace at all costs. Constituti democratic but in reality, power rested justify 2. He said the Soviets were a better form of 2. Trotsky delayed negotiations hoping for a on? with Lenin closing the democracy while the Assembly was a German revolution, but this angered the 3 Expectation: The Congress of Soviets would Assembly? form of bourgeois democracy Germans who continued their military What did it say represent the interests of Local Soviets and be 3. He claimed “dictatorship of the advance into Russia. elected from local soviets proletariat” was the way forward to 3. The resulting treaty was extremely about the Congress Reality: benefit the workers and peasants. unpopular: The Left SRs resigned from 1. The Congress didn’t meet often the Government in protest. of 2. The Congress was only elected from Soviets? Key dates 4. The treaty led to a significant decline in Bolshevik candidates support for the Bolsheviks and increase in 4 What did Expectation: The Sovnarkom should be Oct 1917 First Decrees (Peace, Land, Press) & Sovnarkom support for the SRs and Mensheviks 1 it say appointed by the Congress created 5. The Bolsheviks lost the elections to the about the Reality: soviets across Russia in April and May 2 Dec 1917 Further decrees (Bank & Military) & Cheka created Sovnarko 1. The Sovnarkom was chosen by the Central 1918. Committee rather than the Congress m? 2. The Sovnarkom consisted of only Bolsheviks 3 Jan 1918 Constituent Assembly dissolved 4 Losses 1. 62 million people (1/6 Russia’s from the population) 5 What did Expectation: Soviets should represent the treaty 2. 2 million km2 of land it say masses Reality: 4 Feb 1918 Nationalisation of industry 3. 1/3 Russia’s agricultural production land about 1. From July 1918, members of the former 4. ¼ of Russia’s railway lines Soviets? 5 Mar 1918 Treaty of Brest-Litovsk ‘exploiting classes’ were banned from 5. ¾ of Russia’s iron and coal supplies voting or holding office 6 July 1918 Soviet Constitution established 6. 3 billion roubles in war reparations 2. Worker votes were worth 5x peasant votes Subject: History Topic: 2.2 Bolshevik Consolidation Year Group: 12 1. Causes of the Russian Civil War 3. The murder of the Tsar Key people Led a White army in Siberia and proclaimed Kolchak 1 How did the 1. Their political opponents were not 1 What 1. On 16th-17thJuly 1918, a local Cheka himself ‘Supreme Ruler of Russia’. happened? detachment executed Nicholas II and his Bolsheviks prepared to accept their absolute rule. Yudenich Formed a White army in the north west create 2. Their policies and actions resulted in them family enemies? having many more enemies. 2. It is almost certain that Lenin authorised Makhno An anarchist Green leader in the Ukraine this killing 2 Why else did 1. Some fought the Civil War to achieve Denikin Led the White army Southern Volunteer Army 2 Why was it 1. The Tsar and his family were important people fight? independence from the Russian Empire, but Led a ‘Caucasus Volunteer Army’ against the important? figureheads for the Whites Wrangel others fought to prevent it Bolsheviks during the civil war. 2. Their murder was a big blow for White 3 How did the 1. Russia’s old allies called for direct military morale Dzerzhinsky Head of the Cheka Allies action against the Bolsheviks encourage 2. They were angry with the Russian 4. Why did the Reds win? 5. Government control war? withdrawal from the war and the 1 Geo- 1. The Reds commanded the hub of 1 cancellation of the Tsar’s debts How did 1. Half a million Party members fought graphy communications, the factories and mostly the war for the Red Army - used to obeying 4 Why did Lenin 1. Lenin wanted a conflict to destroy his densely populated areas. increase orders and acting with extreme force fight? opponents in a short war rather than be 2. The Whites were widely dispersed and in less Bolshevik 2. In wartime it was essential that challenged by them throughout Bolshevik developed areas control? orders from the centre were rule. communicated quickly –this 2 Leader- 1. The Red Army was well disciplined under centralisation stayed after the war ship Trotsky, who ensured they were fed and 3. Central controls were brought in to 2. Who fought in the Russian Civil War? supplied. deal with food shortages. 2. The White leadership was disorganized with 1 Reds 1. The Bolshevik Red Army, led by Trotsky little discipline 2 How did 1. To organise the war the Soviet 2 Whites 1. The various armies and groups made up of the the war bureaucracy grew larger –there were 3 Bolsheviks’ opponents The 1. He ensured loyalty by shooting deserters. change more bureaucrats than workers 2. Reintroduced traditional ranks in the army and how the 2. In 1919 the Politburo was created– 2. Led by former Tsarist officers. Role of recruited 50,000 former tsarist officers, country they took over the running of the 3. Had very little in common with except their hatred Trotsky 3. He set up political commissars to ensure their was run? country and replaced the Sovnarkom of the Bolsheviks loyalty 3 What 1. After two assassination attempts on 3 Greens 1. A largely peasant army fighting for independence 4 Unity 1. The Reds were united in their aims and was the Lenin in 1918, the Red Terror started 2. Fought a guerrilla campaign in the Ukraine. ideology. Red to emerge 3. They sided with, and fought against, both Reds and 2. White generals operated independently and Terror? 2. The Cheka grew from 120 employees Whites at different points in the Civil War fought for different objectives in March 1918 to 143,000 by 1921 4 The 1. Britain, France and the USA all sent troops to help 4 What did 1. Round up political opposition and 5 Support 1. Although peasant support varied, generally Allies the Whites the Reds’ land policies were more popular the enforced the central government than the White Cheka commands 5 The 1. Formed from Czech nationalists who had arrived in do? 2. Official records put Cheka executions Czech Russia during the war against Germany. 6 Propa- 1. The Bolsheviks took advantage of the foreign at 13,000 between 1918 & 1920 but Legion 2. Joined forces with the Whites after the Bolsheviks ganda invasion and sloppy discipline of the Whites to the real figure was mire likely around tried to block and arrest some of the Czech show them as degenerate and encouraging 300,000 soldiers foreign invasion. 3. To house all their victims, the 2. Trotsky also travelled spreading propaganda Bolsheviks set up concentration and 6 The 1. Fought to gain control of western Ukraine on his train. labour camps. Poles Subject: History Topic: 2.3 Bolshevik Consolidation Year Group: 12 Key word Definition 1. State Capitalism 3. War Communism GOELRO Organisation formed in 1920 to organise the production and 1 Why? 1. Lenin’s policy was a pragmatic response to the 1 Why? 1. By May 1918, the country was in a state of distribution of electricity problems facing Russia in 1918.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Revolutionary Tribunals and the Origins of Terror in Early Soviet Russia

    1 Revolutionary Tribunals and the Origins of Terror in Early Soviet Russia

    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Revolutionary Tribunals and the Origins of Terror in Early Soviet Russia AUTHORS Rendle, Matthew JOURNAL Historical Research DEPOSITED IN ORE 14 May 2013 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/9361 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication 1 Revolutionary tribunals and the origins of terror in early Soviet Russia* Matthew Rendle University of Exeter Abstract After the October Revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks restructured Russia’s legal system, assigning the central role in targeting their enemies to revolutionary tribunals. Within months, however, this ‘revolutionary justice’ was marginalized in favour of the secret police (Cheka) and a policy of terror. This article utilizes the archives of three tribunals, contemporary writings, newspapers and memoirs to examine the tribunals’ investigations and trials, and their impact. It argues that the relative failure of tribunals paved the way for the terror that engulfed Russia by autumn 1918 and laid the foundations of the repressive Soviet state. On 24 November 1917, as part of a radical overhaul of Russia’s legal system, the Bolsheviks established revolutionary tribunals to deal with counter-revolutionary threats, profiteering, speculation, sabotage and other ‘political’ crimes. The definition of counter-revolution was deliberately vague; it could be any thought or action attacking the goals and achievements of the revolution as defined by the Bolsheviks.
  • The Russian Revolutions: the Impact and Limitations of Western Influence

    The Russian Revolutions: the Impact and Limitations of Western Influence

    Dickinson College Dickinson Scholar Faculty and Staff Publications By Year Faculty and Staff Publications 2003 The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence Karl D. Qualls Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Qualls, Karl D., "The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence" (2003). Dickinson College Faculty Publications. Paper 8. https://scholar.dickinson.edu/faculty_publications/8 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Dickinson Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Karl D. Qualls The Russian Revolutions: The Impact and Limitations of Western Influence After the collapse of the Soviet Union, historians have again turned their attention to the birth of the first Communist state in hopes of understanding the place of the Soviet period in the longer sweep of Russian history. Was the USSR an aberration from or a consequence of Russian culture? Did the Soviet Union represent a retreat from westernizing trends in Russian history, or was the Bolshevik revolution a product of westernization? These are vexing questions that generate a great deal of debate. Some have argued that in the late nineteenth century Russia was developing a middle class, representative institutions, and an industrial economy that, while although not as advanced as those in Western Europe, were indications of potential movement in the direction of more open government, rule of law, free market capitalism. Only the Bolsheviks, influenced by an ideology imported, paradoxically, from the West, interrupted this path of Russian political and economic westernization.
  • Dissidents Versus Communists

    Dissidents Versus Communists

    DISSIDENTS VERSUS COMMUNISTS An Examination of the Soviet Dissidence Movement Matthew Williams Professor Transchel History 419 May 12, 2016 Williams 1 On February 25, 1956, Nikita Khrushchev gave a speech to the Twentieth Congress and to the Communist Party stating that Joseph Stalin was responsible for all of the empire’s then-current issues. He also gave insight into the criminal actions performed by the man during his lifetime. This speech was called the “Secret Speech” as it was not publicized at first, but once word got out about the true nature of Stalin, people began to doubt everything they knew to be true. Khrushchev decreased the censorship and restrictions on people and also freed millions of political prisoners from Gulags, beginning what would come to be referred to as the “thaw”. Many people had practically worshipped Stalin and knew him to represent the Communist party’s creed of infallibility. The tarnishing of his image led many people to seriously doubt the capabilities of the party.1 As truths came out and people began to discuss issues, there was increasing dissatisfaction with the Communist Party and a community of dissenters was born. This community of dissenters would ultimately keep the fight for freedom going long after the end of the thaw era, until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. This paper will examine the dissent movement, from its roots in the end of the Stalin era to the collapse in 1991; it will address how the dissent movement came into being, and how it evolved as new challenges were presented to it.
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe

    American Armies and Battlefields in Europe

    Chapter v1 THE AMERICAN BATTLEFIELDS NORTH OF PARIS chapter gives brief accounts of areas and to all of the American ceme- all American fighting whi ch oc- teries and monuments. This route is Thiscurred on the battle front north of recommended for those who desire to Paris and complete information concern- make an extended automobile tour in the ing the American military cemeteries and region. Starting from Paris, it can be monuments in that general region. The completely covered in four days, allowing military operations which are treated are plenty of time to stop on the way. those of the American lst, 27th, 30th, The accounts of the different operations 33d, 37th, 80th and 91st Divisions and and the descriptions of the American the 6th and 11 th Engineer Regiments. cemeteries and monuments are given in Because of the great distances apart of the order they are reached when following So uthern Encr ance to cb e St. Quentin Can al Tunnel, Near Bellicourc, October 1, 1918 the areas where this fighting occurred no the suggested route. For tbis reason they itinerary is given. Every operation is do not appear in chronological order. described, however, by a brief account Many American units otber tban those illustrated by a sketch. The account and mentioned in this chapter, sucb as avia- sketch together give sufficient information tion, tank, medical, engineer and infantry, to enable the tourist to plan a trip through served behind this part of the front. Their any particular American combat area. services have not been recorded, however, The general map on the next page as the space limitations of tbis chapter indicates a route wbich takes the tourist required that it be limited to those Amer- either int o or cl ose to all of tbese combat ican organizations which actually engaged (371) 372 THE AMERICAN B ATTLEFIELD S NO R TH O F PARIS Suggested Tour of American Battlefields North of Paris __ Miles Ghent ( î 37th and 91st Divisions, Ypres-Lys '"offensive, October 30-November 11, 1918 \ ( N \ 1 80th Division, Somme 1918 Albert 33d Division.
  • THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A

    THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A

    THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR Also by A. B. Murphy ASPECTIVAL USAGE IN RUSSIAN INlRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY TO SHOLOKHOV'S TlKHlY DON MIKHAIL ZOSHCHENKO: A Literary Project Also by G. R. Swain EASTERN EUROPE SINCE 1945 (co-author) THE ORIGINS OF THE RUSSIAN CIVIL WAR RUSSIAN SOCIAL DEMOCRACY AND THE LEGAL LABOUR MOVEMENT,1906-14 The Russian Civil War Documents from the Soviet Archives Edited by v. P. Butt Senior Scientific Collaborator Institute of Russian History Russian Academy of Sciences A. B. Murphy Professor Emeritus of Russian University of Ulster N. A. Myshov Senior Scientific Collaborator and ChiefArchivist Russian State Military Archive and G. R. Swain Professor ofHistory University of the West of England First published in Great Britain 1996 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 978-0-333-59319-6 ISBN 978-1-349-25026-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-25026-4 First published in the United States of America 1996 by ST. MARTIN'S PRESS, INC., Scholarly and Reference Division, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010 ISBN 978-0-312-16337-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Russian civil war: documents from the Soviet archives / edited by V. P. Butt ... ret al.l p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-312-16337-2 (cloth) I. Soviet Union-History-Revolution, 1917-1921-Sources. I. Butt, V. P. DK265.A5372 1996 947.084'I-dc20 96-19904 CIP Selection, editorial matter and translation © V.
  • The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps in World War I: from Inception To

    The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps in World War I: from Inception To

    THE PORTUGUESE EXPEDITIONARY CORPS IN WORLD WAR I: FROM INCEPTION TO COMBAT DESTRUCTION, 1914-1918 Jesse Pyles, B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2012 APPROVED: Geoffrey Wawro, Major Professor Robert Citino, Committee Member Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Pyles, Jesse, The Portuguese Expeditionary Corps in World War I: From Inception to Destruction, 1914-1918. Master of Arts (History), May 2012, 130 pp., references, 86. The Portuguese Expeditionary Force fought in the trenches of northern France from April 1917 to April 1918. On 9 April 1918 the sledgehammer blow of Operation Georgette fell upon the exhausted Portuguese troops. British accounts of the Portuguese Corps’ participation in combat on the Western Front are terse. Many are dismissive. In fact, Portuguese units experienced heavy combat and successfully held their ground against all attacks. Regarding Georgette, the standard British narrative holds that most of the Portuguese soldiers threw their weapons aside and ran. The account is incontrovertibly false. Most of the Portuguese combat troops held their ground against the German assault. This thesis details the history of the Portuguese Expeditionary Force. Copyright 2012 by Jesse Pyles ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The love of my life, my wife Izabella, encouraged me to pursue graduate education in history. This thesis would not have been possible without her support. Professor Geoffrey Wawro directed my thesis. He provided helpful feedback regarding content and structure. Professor Robert Citino offered equal measures of instruction and encouragement.
  • Woodrow Wilson's Ideological War: American Intervention in Russia

    Woodrow Wilson's Ideological War: American Intervention in Russia

    Best Integrated Writing Volume 2 Article 9 2015 Woodrow Wilson’s Ideological War: American Intervention in Russia, 1918-1920 Shane Hapner Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/biw Part of the American Literature Commons, Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons, Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Business Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Comparative Literature Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, Gender and Sexuality Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Nutrition Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons, Religion Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hapner, S. (2015). Woodrow Wilson’s Ideological War: American Intervention in Russia, 1918-1920, Best Integrated Writing, 2. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Best Integrated Writing by an authorized editor of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact library- [email protected]. SHANE HAPNER HST 4220 Best Integrated Writing: Journal of Excellence in Integrated Writing Courses at Wright State Fall 2015 (Volume 2) Article #8 Woodrow Wilson’s Ideological War: American Intervention in Russia, 1918-1920 SHANE HAPNER HST 4220-01: Soviet Union Spring 2014 Dr. Sean Pollock Dr. Pollock notes that having carefully examined an impressive array of primary and secondary sources, Shane demonstrates in forceful, elegant prose that American intervention in the Russian civil war was consonant with Woodrow Wilson’s principle of self- determination. Thanks to the sophistication and cogency of the argument, and the clarity of the prose, the reader forgets that the paper is the work of an undergraduate.
  • Army-End-Strength.Pdf

    Army-End-Strength.Pdf

    Getting it right Determining the optimal active component end strength of the all-volunteer Army to meet the demands of the 21st century Colonel John Evans, United States Army FEDERAL EXECUTIVE FELLOW Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence June 2015 The views expressed in this monograph are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Army, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. The Brookings Institution is a private, non-profit organization. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings research are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the view of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. Cover photo courtesy of The U.S. Army Flickr, U.S. Army photo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode. CENTER FOR 21ST CENTURY SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE i CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2 A BRIEF HISTORY OF ARMY END STRENGTH ........................................................... 4 Through Wold War II ..................................................................................................... 4 The new great power and the Cold
  • Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture

    Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution India and the Contemporary World Society Ofthefuture

    Socialism in Europe and II the Russian Revolution Chapter 1 The Age of Social Change In the previous chapter you read about the powerful ideas of freedom and equality that circulated in Europe after the French Revolution. The French Revolution opened up the possibility of creating a dramatic change in the way in which society was structured. As you have read, before the eighteenth century society was broadly divided into estates and orders and it was the aristocracy and church which controlled economic and social power. Suddenly, after the revolution, it seemed possible to change this. In many parts of the world including Europe and Asia, new ideas about individual rights and who olution controlled social power began to be discussed. In India, Raja v Rammohan Roy and Derozio talked of the significance of the French Revolution, and many others debated the ideas of post-revolutionary Europe. The developments in the colonies, in turn, reshaped these ideas of societal change. ian Re ss Not everyone in Europe, however, wanted a complete transformation of society. Responses varied from those who accepted that some change was necessary but wished for a gradual shift, to those who wanted to restructure society radically. Some were ‘conservatives’, others were ‘liberals’ or ‘radicals’. What did these terms really mean in the context of the time? What separated these strands of politics and what linked them together? We must remember that these terms do not mean the same thing in all contexts or at all times. We will look briefly at some of the important political traditions of the nineteenth century, and see how they influenced change.
  • Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation

    Organized Crime and the Russian State Challenges to U.S.-Russian Cooperation J. MICHAEL WALLER "They write I'm the mafia's godfather. It was Vladimir Ilich Lenin who was the real organizer of the mafia and who set up the criminal state." -Otari Kvantrishvili, Moscow organized crime leader.l "Criminals Nave already conquered the heights of the state-with the chief of the KGB as head of a mafia group." -Former KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin.2 Introduction As the United States and Russia launch a Great Crusade against organized crime, questions emerge not only about the nature of joint cooperation, but about the nature of organized crime itself. In addition to narcotics trafficking, financial fraud and racketecring, Russian organized crime poses an even greater danger: the theft and t:rafficking of weapons of mass destruction. To date, most of the discussion of organized crime based in Russia and other former Soviet republics has emphasized the need to combat conven- tional-style gangsters and high-tech terrorists. These forms of criminals are a pressing danger in and of themselves, but the problem is far more profound. Organized crime-and the rarnpant corruption that helps it flourish-presents a threat not only to the security of reforms in Russia, but to the United States as well. The need for cooperation is real. The question is, Who is there in Russia that the United States can find as an effective partner? "Superpower of Crime" One of the greatest mistakes the West can make in working with former Soviet republics to fight organized crime is to fall into the trap of mirror- imaging.
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The

    The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The

    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
  • Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence

    Russia • Military / Security Historical Dictionaries of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, No. 5 PRINGLE At its peak, the KGB (Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti) was the largest HISTORICAL secret police and espionage organization in the world. It became so influential DICTIONARY OF in Soviet politics that several of its directors moved on to become premiers of the Soviet Union. In fact, Russian president Vladimir V. Putin is a former head of the KGB. The GRU (Glavnoe Razvedvitelnoe Upravleniye) is the principal intelligence unit of the Russian armed forces, having been established in 1920 by Leon Trotsky during the Russian civil war. It was the first subordinate to the KGB, and although the KGB broke up with the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, the GRU remains intact, cohesive, highly efficient, and with far greater resources than its civilian counterparts. & The KGB and GRU are just two of the many Russian and Soviet intelli- gence agencies covered in Historical Dictionary of Russian and Soviet Intelligence. Through a list of acronyms and abbreviations, a chronology, an introductory HISTORICAL DICTIONARY OF essay, a bibliography, and hundreds of cross-referenced dictionary entries, a clear picture of this subject is presented. Entries also cover Russian and Soviet leaders, leading intelligence and security officers, the Lenin and Stalin purges, the gulag, and noted espionage cases. INTELLIGENCE Robert W. Pringle is a former foreign service officer and intelligence analyst RUSSIAN with a lifelong interest in Russian security. He has served as a diplomat and intelligence professional in Africa, the former Soviet Union, and Eastern Europe. For orders and information please contact the publisher && SOVIET Scarecrow Press, Inc.