DOCSLIB.ORG

Pivot of Civilization Rivet of Life

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pivot of Civilization Rivet of Life Pivot of Civilization or Rivet of Life ? Conflicting Worldviews and Same-Sex Marriage CARMAN BRADLEY Canada • England • Ireland • United States of America © Copyright 2004 Carman Bradley. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written prior permission of the author. Printed in Victoria, Canada Note for Librarians: a cataloguing record for this book that includes Dewey Classifi cation and US Library of Congress numbers is available from the National Library of Canada. The complete cataloguing record can be obtained from the National Libraryʼs online database at: www.nlc-bnc.ca/amicus/index-e.html ISBN 1-4120-1900-1 This book was published on-demand in cooperation with Trafford Publishing. On-demand publishing is a unique process and service of making a book available for retail sale to the public taking advantage of on-demand manufacturing and Internet marketing. On-demand publishing includes promotions, retail sales, manufacturing, order fulfi lment, accounting and collecting royalties on behalf of the author. Suite 6E, 2333 Government St., Victoria, B.C. V8T 4P4, CANADA Phone 250-383-6864 Toll-free 1-888-232-4444 (Canada & US) Fax 250-383-6804 E-mail [email protected] Web site www.trafford.com trafford publishing is a division of trafford holdings ltd. Trafford Catalogue #03-2278 www.trafford.com/robots/03-2278.html 10 9 8 Dedicated to the survival of the traditional family – a societal model based on monogamous, life-long, heterosexual marriage, and child-rearing remaining the responsibility of the biological parents. For the love of Mom, Dad, Gill, Mary, Lucy and Amy. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION - Why This Book? Why Now? ............................................ i PART 1 - ELEMENTS OF FREE WILL 1 CHOICE, BOUNDARIES AND CONSEQUENCES ...................... 1 Choice and Ecology 1 Natural Boundaries 2 Free Sex? 5 Wellness Doctrine for Promiscuity 8 Magic Bullet – Codependency on Technology 11 Ecological Consequences of Gay Lifestyle 12 Boundaries of Silence 21 Lessons of AIDS and Anal Sex 26 2 POLITICS, ALLIANCES AND COGNITIVE DISSONANCE ... 32 Manifestations of Cognitive Dissonance 32 Lesbianization of a Women’s Movement 44 Infinite Orgasm 52 REAL Women and Feminists for Life 56 Politics of Oppression and Patriarchy 63 Lesbian and Gay Bigotry 68 Third Wave Feminists 78 PART 2 - TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE PARADIGMS 3 PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION............................................................. 83 Mary Wollstonecraft 1759-1797 85 Charlotte Perkins Gilman, 1860 – 1935 86 Emma Goldman 1869-1940 88 Margaret Sanger 1879 – 1966 98 Alfred Kinsey 1894 – 1956 105 Henry Morgentaler 1923 - 115 Humanistic (Modern Gnostic) Civilization 123 4 RIVET OF LIFE .............................................................................. 136 Two Sides in a Binary Decision 136 Creation of the Universe 140 Creation of Life 145 Creation of Humankind 168 Christianity 101 179 Pagan Slander 182 Gnostic Cancer 187 Greek and Roman Sexism 202 Christian Patriarchy 207 Christian Hypocrisy: A Self-made Cancer 217 PART 3 - UNORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY: THE “COMPROMISE” PARADIGM 5 DEBUNKING GAY AND PRO-GAY CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY .....225 God’s Truth 225 Bailey’s Pervert – The False Homosexual 233 Queer Christianity 244 Born Again Bisexual 257 Consequences of Sexual Experimentation 261 A Scriptural Boundary for Man-Boy Sex? 271 The Rev. Dr. John Spong 278 Replacing Leviticus Code with the Condom Code 287 6 THE PARADOX OF HOMOSEXUAL REORIENTATION ...... 305 The Divided Kingdom 305 Is Conversion Therapy Ethical? 308 APA Fight Over Reorientation 311 Scientific Facts on Conversion Success 313 The Right to Choose 316 Reasons GBLTQ Want to Change 318 There is No Gay Gene 320 Psychology of Homosexuality 327 Barriers to Change 335 Reorientation Process 337 Role of the Church 341 PART 4 - THE PRACTICALITY OF COMPETING WORLDVIEWS 7 BABIES, CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND PARENTING... 345 The Unorthodox Family 346 Symptoms of Crisis 353 Collateral Damage From Divorce 358 Why Do You Work? 363 Anti-Parenting Culture 369 Family Risk Factors 380 Teen Sexual Liberation 388 Abstinence 397 Abortion 407 8 SINGLES, COUPLES, MARRIAGE AND ALTERNATIVE FAMILIES ........................................................................................ 422 Singles Life 423 Offensive Against Marriage 431 Cohabitation 441 Heterosexual Matrimony 444 Christian Marriage 447 Paradox of GBLTQ Marriage 454 Alternative GBLTQ Union 479 Clones: Alternative Family Planning 486 PART 5 - PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION OR RIVET OF LIFE? 9 THEISTIC BOUNDARIES TO RIGHTS AND CHOICE .......... 501 Is the God of the Charter Real? 503 Your Choice – Your Voice 513 Twenty-Four Questions of Philosophy and Belief 515 Pivot of Civilization or Rivet of Life? 525 Respecting Each Other’s Space – A Last Hope Paradigm Shift 525 A Christian Closing Prayer 529 Appendix 1 – Letter to High School ................................................................ 533 Endnotes ............................................................................................................ 541 i INTRODUCTION Why this Book? Why Now? Two and a half years into my research and writing, after an infinite number of two finger key strokes and endnotes, I asked myself: Why this book? Why this time? It may seem an odd confession, but I started this project without any idea of where it would end, led by an earnest desire to study the subject matter. Foremost, this book details the secular, feminist, humanist, free love worldview, which I have called “Pivot of Civilization” and the orthodox Christian paradigm, labeled “Rivet of Life.” With the recently heightened issue of same-sex marriage, I now see the research as timely and the book contents as a constructive contribution to the de- bate. The inspirational spark for this effort came in the form of a guest speaker evalu- ation, which my oldest daughter literally tossed into my lap one evening in Decem- ber 2000. Mary, then sixteen, had attended a guest speaker presentation on “sexual assault” at High School. When she was asked in the evaluation (opposite page) to “select one thing that struck you as most powerful and then to discuss how it af- fected you personally,” Mary wrote: The thing that struck me most ‘powerfully’ was that the speaker seemed to think that being gay was scientifically decided in your genes. I really disagree. It says in the Bible that being gay is a sin. So why would God allow people to be gay if he didn’t make them that way? The “gay gene” issue bothered me a lot. I felt that my daughter’s and thus my family’s “space” was willfully invaded. Like a previously dormant immune system, now alerted, I found I had become animated in a quest for answers and explana- tions. Here was a clash of life beliefs, which I felt had to be addressed. I wrote to the High School (Appendix 1) seeking clarification on school curriculum and policy. A passage, which describes the situation as I saw it reads: Every voice in the debate speaks from some sort of value system. There can be no ‘neutral’ answers to most social issues. The problem is, while claiming only to dis- courage scapegoating, gay-affirming programs do much more. In reality, they pro- mote a particular worldview; complete with truth claims those students are expected to adopt. These programs promote the value systems of a particular social group and denigrate the views of another, while at the same time, distorting science.1 In the months following, I determined that the School did not hold the view that homosexuality was genetic. More important, according to the host teacher, “the guest speaker was only giving her personal beliefs.” Equally as shocking, the School Board could not show me in the curriculum where any guidance was given for in- struction on homosexuality; nor did they respond to questions 2-5 posed in my original letter (Appendix 1). The questions were as follows: ii Introduction — Why this Book? Why Now? The ‘homosexual orientation’ or ‘homosexual identity’ does not itself cause medical problems; only typical homosexual behaviors can. What steps does XXXX School take to portray the health risks of a gay lifestyle? During teaching on homosexuality, is any effort made to portray the heterosexual family unit as the optimum model for raising children? Could you outline when formal teaching about homosexuality is given to students over their time with the Calgary Board of Education? What are the objectives of the education at each stage? When teaching about homosexuality, is there any discussion on how this subject is viewed by Christians, Jews and students of other religions? The School Board representative did say that a new curriculum was under devel- opment but she could not speculate on its guidance for teaching about homosexual- ity. Since Mary’s class was slated for a further presentation on the subject of homo- sexuality, I met with the next guest speaker to decide if Mary should attend. Julia (assumed name) was then a member on staff at the Calgary Birth Control Associa- tion (CBCA). Since 1996, CBCA has been providing comprehensive sexual educa- tion to high schools within the Public School System. Over 4300 students had al- ready participated in CBCA’s anti-homophobia education classes, designed to chal- lenge stereotypes surrounding gay (G), lesbian (L), and bisexual (B) youth and to decrease factors leading to isolation of GLB youth. CBCA, a pro-choice agency, is also a “strong supporter of the feminist analysis of women’s issues.” During our discussion at the abortion clinic, I showed Julia the guest speaker evaluation and asked what her position was on the “gay gene” theory. Her response remains indelibly etched in my memory. “Oh we would never say that. We don’t discuss philosophy, just rights.” Said with such conviction, this statement strength- ened my resolve to do something, since all one hears about these days are “rights.” Everyone wants constitutional (guaranteed) rights to do as they wish. Rights-based arguments are not just a problem for heterosexuals, but even homosexual and pro- gay theorists complain about the strategy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The 2020 TJFP Team
    On the Precipice of Trans Justice Funding Project 2020 Annual Report Contents 2 Acknowledgements 4 Terminology 5 Letter from the Executive Director 11 Our Grantmaking Year in Review 20 Grantees by Region and Issue Areas 22 The 2020 TJFP Team 27 Creating a Vision for Funding Trans Justice 29 Welcoming Growth 34 Funding Criteria 35 Some of the Things We Think About When We Make Grants 37 From Grantee to Fellow to Facilitator 40 Reflections From the Table 43 Our Funding Model as a Non-Charitable Trust 45 Map of 2020 Grantees 49 Our 2020 Grantees 71 Donor Reflections 72 Thank You to Our Donors! This report and more resources are available at transjusticefundingproject.org. Acknowledgements We recognize that none of this would have been possible without the support of generous individuals and fierce communities from across the nation. Thank you to everyone who submitted an application, selected grantees, volunteered, spoke on behalf of the project, shared your wisdom and feedback with us, asked how you could help, made a donation, and cheered us on. Most of all, we thank you for trusting and supporting trans leadership. A special shoutout to our TJFP team, our Community Grantmaking Fellows and facilitators; Karen Pittelman; Nico Amador; Cristina Herrera; Zakia Mckensey; V Varun Chaudhry; Stephen Switzer at Rye Financials; Raquel Willis; Team Dresh, Jasper Lotti; butch.queen; Shakina; Nat Stratton-Clarke and the staff at Cafe Flora; Rebecca Fox; Alex Lee of the Grantmakers United for Trans Communities program at Funders for LGBT Issues; Kris
    [Show full text]
  • The National Organization for Women in Memphis, Columbus, and San Francisco
    RETHINKING THE LIBERAL/RADICAL DIVIDE: THE NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN IN MEMPHIS, COLUMBUS, AND SAN FRANCISCO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy In the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Stephanie Gilmore, M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by: Professor Leila J. Rupp, Advisor _________________________________ History Graduate Advisor Professor Susan M. Hartmann Professor Kenneth J. Goings ABSTRACT This project uses the history of the National Organization for Women (NOW) to explore the relationship of liberal and radical elements in the second wave of the U.S. women’s movement. Combining oral histories with archival documents, this project offers a new perspective on second-wave feminism as a part of the long decade of the 1960s. It also makes location a salient factor in understanding post– World War II struggles for social justice. Unlike other scholarship on second-wave feminism, this study explores NOW in three diverse locations—Memphis, Columbus, and San Francisco—to see what feminists were doing in different kinds of communities: a Southern city, a non-coastal Northern community, and a West Coast progressive location. In Memphis—a city with a strong history of civil rights activism—black-white racial dynamics, a lack of toleration for same-sex sexuality, and political conservatism shaped feminist activism. Columbus, like Memphis, had a dominant white population and relatively conservative political climate (although less so than in Memphis), but it also boasted an open lesbian community, strong university presence, and a history of radical feminism and labor activism.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40039-9 - Battling Pornography: The American Feminist Anti-Pornography Movement, 1976-1986 Carolyn Bronstein Frontmatter More information Battling Pornography Pornography catapulted to the forefront of the American women’s movement in the 1980s, singled out by some leading feminists as an agent of female oppression and celebrated by others as an essential ingredient of sexual liberation. In Battling Pornography , Carolyn Bronstein locates the origins of anti-pornography sentiment in the turbulent social and cultural history of the late 1960s and 1970s, including women’s mixed responses to the sexual revolution and the rise of radical feminism, and explains the gradual emergence of a con- troversial anti-pornography movement. Based on extensive original archival research, the book chronicles the history of three grassroots organizations and shows that activists fi rst protested images of sex- ual violence against women in advertisements, Hollywood fi lms, and other mainstream media. They emphasized public education and con- sumer action and demanded that corporations behave ethically toward women. Over time, feminist leaders made a strategic choice to reorient the movement to pornography to leverage the term’s considerable rhe- torical and symbolic power. In so doing, they unwittingly attracted right-wing supporters who opposed sexual freedom and ignited a forceful feminist countermovement in defense of sexuality and free speech. Battling Pornography presents a fascinating account of the rise and fall of this signifi cant American social movement and docu- ments the contributions of infl uential activists on both sides of the pornography debate, including some of the best-known American feminists.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion, Politics, and Politically Incorrect Sex: Towards a History Of
    PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies CEU eTD Collection Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) Budapest, Hungary 2015 PASSION, POLITICS, AND POLITICALLY INCORRECT SEX: TOWARDS A HISTORY OF LESBIAN SADOMASOCHISM IN THE USA 1975-1993 by Anna Robinson Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, Central European University In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies Main supervisor: Francisca de Haan (Central European University) Second reader: Anne-Marie Korte (Utrecht University) CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2015 Approved by: ________________________ Abstract This thesis is an exploration of the largely underexamined history of lesbian sadomasochism (SM) in the United States between the mid-1970s, when the first organised lesbian feminist SM groups were founded, and 1993, by which time public debates about lesbian SM were becoming less visible. I engage with feminist discourses around lesbian SM within the so- called feminist sex wars of the 1980s, tracing the sometimes dramatic rise to prominence of lesbian SM as a feminist issue. Entwined in this web of controversy, I assert, is the story of a perceived fundamental split in the feminist movement between those who believed SM was patriarchal, abusive and violent, and those who saw it as a consensual expression of sexual freedom and liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    BEYOND BARNARD: FEMINISM, LIBERALISM, AND THE SEX WARS By LORNA BRACEWELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2015 1 © 2015 Lorna Bracewell 2 To Paola, my wife 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my advisor, Daniel O’Neill, for introducing me to history and showing me why it might behoove a political theorist to know a little something about it. I thank my committee, the Department of Political Science, the Center for Women’s Studies and Gender Research, the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the Graduate School at the University of Florida for giving me the opportunity, financial support, and intellectual freedom to follow my curiosity wherever it led. I thank my undergraduate teacher and mentor, Art Vanden Houten, for introducing me to Catharine MacKinnon’s Toward A Feminist Theory of the State and, inadvertently, the sex wars when I was a student in his Contemporary Political Thought course at Flagler College in the spring of 2003. Finally, I thank my wife, Paola Aguirre, my friends and colleagues, Mauro Carracioli, Alec Dinnin, Billy Kelly, Jessica Lancia, Manu Samnotra, and Seaton Tarrant, my parents, Lana and Michael Bracewell, and my sister, Amy Wenditz, for listening patiently, sharing generously, and forgiving readily when I neglected my most important obligations for the sake of this comparatively inconsequential project. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1
    NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. In San Francisco, the flyers denounced “mass media images of the pretty, sexy, pas- sive, childlike vacuous woman.” See Ruth Rosen, The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America, 205. 2. For an account and criticism of the decline of civic participation and its conse- quences for politics, see Robert D. Putnam’s Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. 3. Fewer single women than married women vote (52 percent as compared to 68 per- cent in the 2000 election), and more young women today are likely to be single. See “Women’s Voices, Women Vote: National Survey Polling Memo,” Lake, Snell, and Perry Associates, October 19, 2004. 4. Nancy Cott, The Grounding of Modern Feminism, 365, quoting Judy 1:1 (June 1919): 2:3. 5. Academics Deborah Rosenfelt and Judith Stacey are also credited for reintroducing the term “postfeminist” during this time. See their “Second Thoughts on the Sec- ond Wave,” 341–361. 6. Summers’s remarks were made at the NBER Conference on Diversifying the Science & Engineering Workforce in Cambridge, Massachusetts on January 14, 2005. At an industry conference in Toronto on October 21, 2005, French said, “Women don’t make it to the top because they don’t deserve to. They’re crap.” He added that women inevitably “wimp out and go suckle something.” See Tom Leonard, “Adver- tising Chief Loses Job over French Maid and Sexist Insults.” 7. See The White House Project, Who’s Talking Now: A Follow-Up Analysis of Guest Ap- pearances by Women on the Sunday Morning Talk Shows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Feminist Food in Feminist Restaurants, Cafes, and Coffeehouses | Érudit | Cuizine V7 N2 2016 |
    10/30/2019 Counter Culture: The Making of Feminist Food in Feminist Restaurants, Cafes, and Coffeehouses | Érudit | Cuizine v7 n2 2016 | Zone clients Cuizine: The Journal of Canadian Food Cultures / Cuizine : revue des cultures culinaires au Canada Volume 7, numéro 2, 2016 Direction : Renée Desjardins (editor-in-chief) Éditeur : McGill University Library ISSN : 1918-5480 (numérique) DOI : 10.7202/1038477ar Article Counter Culture: The Making of Feminist Food in Feminist Restaurants, Cafes, and Coffeehouses Alexandra Ketchum Abstract Self-identified feminist restaurants and cafes of the 1970s and 1980s in the United States and Canada acted as spaces that challenged the status quo around cooking and consumption through their creation of feminist food. Each restaurant and cafe defined “feminist food” differently depending on the particular feminist ethics of the restaurant owners. Depending on the restaurant, making their food feminist revolved around vegetarian ethics, labour issues, cost, and sourcing of products. By looking at what was included and banned on these restaurant menus, this article shows the ways that food could be labelled as feminist. Furthermore, this piece demonstrates how one could assert feminism within a business dedicated to food—one in which complex relationships with the kitchen can also be analyzed (the kitchen being often labelled a "traditional" place for women). Résumé Les restaurants et les cafés canadiens et américains des années 1970 et 1980 qui s’identifiaient comme étant féministes constituaient des espaces pour contester les statu quo liés à la cuisine et à la consommation. C’est notamment par la création de plats ‘féministes’ que ces restaurants et ces cafés pouvaient contester certaines normes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander, Dolores
    Voices of Feminism Oral History Project Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College Northampton, MA DOLORES ALEXANDER Interviewed by KELLY ANDERSON March 20, 2004 and October 22, 2005 Southold, NY This interview was made possible with generous support from the Ford Foundation. © Dolores Alexander 2006 Sophia Smith Collection Voices of Feminism Oral History Project Narrator Dolores Alexander (b.1931) was raised in a working-class Italian community in Newark, NJ, educated in Catholic schools, and attended City College in the late 1950s. Alexander worked in journalism most of her professional life and it was in her capacity as a reporter for Newsday that she came across a press release announcing the formation of the National Organization for Women (NOW) in 1966. Alexander became NOW’s first Executive Director from 1969-1970, was a co-owner of a lesbian feminist restaurant in the Village with partner Jill Ward during the 1970s, and was a founder of Women Against Pornography in the 1980s. She has been present at many significant events of the women’s movement: integrating the Want Ads in the New York Times, the lesbian purge of NOW, the National Women’s Conference in Houston, 1977, and the UN Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995. Alexander remains active in the lesbian community on the North Fork of Long Island. Interviewer Kelly Anderson (b.1969) is an educator, historian, and community activist. She has an M.A. in women’s history from Sarah Lawrence College and is a Ph.D. candidate in U.S. History at the CUNY Graduate Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of a Politically Incorrect Feminist by Phyllis Chesler Robert Brannon Brooklyn College CUNY, [email protected]
    Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence Volume 3 | Issue 3 Article 2 October 2018 Review of A Politically Incorrect Feminist by Phyllis Chesler Robert Brannon Brooklyn College CUNY, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons, Health Psychology Commons, Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, and the Multicultural Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Brannon, Robert (2018) "Review of A Politically Incorrect Feminist by Phyllis Chesler," Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence: Vol. 3: Iss. 3, Article 2. DOI: 10.23860/dignity.2018.03.03.02 Available at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss3/2https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/dignity/vol3/iss3/2 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dignity: A Journal on Sexual Exploitation and Violence by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review of A Politically Incorrect Feminist by Phyllis Chesler Abstract Phyllis Chesler’s new memoir, A Politically Incorrect Feminist (St. Martin's Press, 2018), spans almost fifty years of second-wave feminism. She names 100s of women, both famous and virtually unknown today who took part in the awakening and growing women’s movement, marching, sitting-in, writing and organizing since the 1960’s. It is the personal life story of one of the earliest feminist authors and political activists of the second- wave, the author of Women and Madness and 17 other books. Chelser discusses major issues of the time and provides an insider’s view of many of the feminism’s most significant public events.
    [Show full text]
  • Blacktranslivesmatter Reader Sociologists for Trans Justice 2020
    #BlackTransLivesMatter Reader Sociologists for Trans Justice 2020 Compiled by: Committee for Advancing Trans, Non-Binary, and Intersex Scholarship Gabrie'l J. Atchison and Megan Nanney Contact Information: Should you want to contribute to Sociologists for Trans Justice or have any questions, please contact [email protected]. ​ About the Reader: In society today, we are presented with a paradox of sorts: on one hand, there have been significant social and political advances regarding sexual orientation and gender identity. Yet, on the other hand, with ​ ​ increasing visibility and progress, there is also a simultaneous and almost inevitable increase in the backlash targeting the most vulnerable segments of the LGBTQ population--trans and non-binary people, and particularly Black trans and non-binary people. As of August 2020, the Human Rights Campaign has ​ ​ recorded at least 26 deaths of trans people in the United States due to fatal violence, the majority of whom were Black transgender women including Monika Diamond, Nina Pop, Dominique “Rem'mie” Fells, and Riah Milton. Additionally, Black trans women disproportionately experience social, economic, and political marginalization due to the lack of legal representation, barriers to gender-affirming healthcare, legal name and gender changes, physical spaces, and other seemingly neutral administrative systems that enforce narrow binary categories of gender and force people into them in order to get their basic needs met (Spade 2015). It is clear that racism, sexism, classism, ableism, homophobia, and transphobia intersect in ways that shorten the lives of Black trans people. As outlined in the S4TJ Statement on Black Lives Matter and Racial Justice, the #TransJusticeSyllabus ​ ​ ​ was identified as one key area of intervention to center scholarship on the intersections of racial justice ​ and trans justice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Liberals and the Attack on Feminism I Edited by Dorchen Leidholdt and Janice G
    The ATHENE Series General Editors Consulting Editor Gloria Bowles Dale Spender Renate Klein Janice Raymond The Athene Series assumes that all those who are concerned with formulating explanations of the way the world works need to know and appreciate the significance of basic feminist principles. The growth of feminist research has challenged almost all aspects of social organization in our culture. The Athene Series focuses on the construction of knowledge arid the exclusion of women from the process— both as theorists and subjects of study— and offers innovative studies that challenge established theories and research. On Athene— When Metis, goddess of wisdom who presided over all knowledge was pregnant with Athene, she was swallowed up by Zeus who then gave birth to Athene from his head. The original Athene is thus the parthenogenetic daughter of a strong mother and as the feminist myth goes, at the “third birth” of Athene she stops being Zeus’ obedient mouthpiece and returns to her real source: the science and wisdom of womankind. Published by Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue New York, New York Copyright © 1990 by Dorchen Leidholdt and Janice G. Raymond All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism I edited by Dorchen Leidholdt and Janice G. Raymond. — 1st ed. p. cm. — (Athene series) Essays which originated as speeches and panel presentations at a conference on April 6, 1987, at the New York University Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Recipes for Resistance: Feminist Political Discourse About Cooking, 1870-1985 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/87r6497z Author Williams, Stacy Jeanne Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Recipes for Resistance: Feminist Political Discourse About Cooking, 1870-1985 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology by Stacy Jeanne Williams Committee in charge: Professor Mary Blair-Loy, Chair Professor Amy Binder Professor Jeffrey Haydu Professor Isaac Martin Professor Rebecca Plant 2017 The Dissertation of Stacy Jeanne Williams is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION For Kevin Bradley Williams, 1988-2010 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page ................................................................................................................... iii Dedication .......................................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v List of Tables ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]