Dronning Louises Bro

Dronning Louises Bro Ingen bro uden undtagelser Queen Louise’s Bridge No bridge without exeptions Cille Malene Sørensen 58056 BA – Plan, By og Proces Julie Holstein 58388 Roskilde Universitet Naja Holsøe Duncker 57699 Vejleder: Esben Holm Nielsen Simon Hjortskov Christensen 57671 Antal anslag: 162.131 eks. Resume Resume Dronning Louises Bro er efter omlægningen af Nørrebrogade blevet et populært byrum for forskelligartede aktivitetsformer. Heraf undersøger dette projekt broen som et særligt fænomen, da dennes funktioner både ser sig gældende som transitzone og opholdsrum. På baggrund af dette søger projektet svar på, hvilke rumlige kvaliteter Dronning Louises Bro tilbyder, og hvordan disse tilegnes og videreudvikles gennem livet på broen. Det analytiske udgangspunkt bygger på en tvedeling af Henri Lefebvres begrebslige triade, som skal sikre en forståelse for casens iboende fysiske praktikker og sociale praksisser som byrum. Den teoretiske tilgangsvinkel til casen anskuer disse to elementer separat, men anvendes samtidig som en samlet og gensidigt påvirkelig enhed, der søger at skabe indsigt i Dronning Louises Bro som fænomen. Heraf kan projektet konkludere at broens rumlige kvaliteter er af afgørende medskabende karakter for broens konstant udviklende byliv og identitet. Det kan endvidere konstateres, at mangel på planlægning kan siges at åbne muligheden for midlertidighed og alternativ tilegnelse af rumlige kvaliteter, som kan resultere i nye sociale praksisser på broen. Abstract This project studies Queen Louise’s Bridge as a special phenomenon, as the bridge incorporates both traffic transit and stay. The reconstruction of the adjacent Nørrebrogade, has resulted in an unintentional popularity for Queen Louise’s Bridge. Based on this the project seeks to answer what spatial qualities the bridge offer and how the qualities develop further through urban life. Henri Lefebvre’s spatial triad will be used as the analytical tool to examine the social- and physical practice. The theoretical approach to the case perceive these two perspectives as separate but is being used as a collected unit that is mutually influenced by each other. We do this in order to reach insight into Queen Louise’s Bridge as a phenomenon. Thereof this project concludes that spatial qualities are essential to the bridge’s constantly developing urban life and identity. Furthermore, it is possible to state that the lack of planning could open up the opportunity of temporary use of space and alternative acquirement of spatial qualities, which can result in new social practices on the bridge. 2 af 86 Indholdsfortegnelse Indledning ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Problemfelt ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Problemformulering .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Rumbegrebets tvedeling ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Projektdesign ........................................................................................................................................................ 13 Fænomenologi og hermeneutik ...................................................................................................................... 14 Case ........................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Dronning Louises Bro .............................................................................................................................. 17 Det geografiske område ..................................................................................................................................... 17 Omlægningen af Nørrebrogade ....................................................................................................................... 18 Teori ............................................................................................................................................................... 22 Introduktion .......................................................................................................................................................... 22 Den fysiske praktik .............................................................................................................................................. 23 Kvalitetskriterier for det fysiske rum ........................................................................................................................... 23 Vejens rolle ............................................................................................................................................................................... 26 Det teoretiske krydsfelt ..................................................................................................................................... 32 Sense of place .......................................................................................................................................................................... 32 Den sociale praksis .............................................................................................................................................. 33 Midlertidighed i rummet .................................................................................................................................................... 33 Retten til byen ......................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Byens rytmer ........................................................................................................................................................................... 34 Selvforstærkende bylivs-processer ............................................................................................................................... 37 Undersøgelsens metoder ........................................................................................................................ 38 Observationer ........................................................................................................................................................ 39 Byrumsanalyse ....................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Deltagerobservation ............................................................................................................................................................ 40 Undersøgelsens interview ................................................................................................................................. 41 Visuel dokumentation ........................................................................................................................................ 43 Kodning .................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Det ideografiske videnskabsideal .................................................................................................................. 46 Transparens frem for reliabilitet .................................................................................................................................... 46 3 af 86 Gyldighed frem for validitet .............................................................................................................................................. 47 Genkendelighed frem for generaliserbarhed ............................................................................................................ 47 Analyse .......................................................................................................................................................... 48 Analysedel 1 ........................................................................................................................................................... 48 Rummets Kvaliteter ............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Trafikregulering ..................................................................................................................................................................... 57 Delkonklusion ....................................................................................................................................................... 63 Analysedel 2 ........................................................................................................................................................... 64 De tre aktivitetsformer ....................................................................................................................................................... 64 Broens sociale aspekter ...................................................................................................................................................... 68 Identitet

Load more